DOCSLIB.ORG

Jewish Roots Page

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jewish Roots Page Welcome to Jewish Roots Page iii - Minitestimony Now we are at the beginning of one of the most important studies you will ever undertake for Y’shua Hamashiach (Jesus the Messiah). The writer of Christianity-Its Jewish Roots is Dr. Jack Sternberg, an Oncologist from Little Rock Arkansas. His enthusiasm for the Messiah was found in a non-denominational church in Little Rock Arkansas. It led him to gather information from various sources so that he could understand the whole story of God and His Messiah. Dr. Jack discovered that knowledge in and of itself will not get you redeemed unto God. Instead it will puff you up and give credence to your reasoning to take offense to the beliefs of others. Judaism has its understandings and Christianity does as well. However, one thing stands out as Dr. Jack points toward FAITH. One of the blessings of this teaching that grabbed me is the intention not to offend anyone but to bring an almost unknown dimension of the Gospel to light; that of Jesus’ Jewishness. Most Christian seminaries pay little or no attention to Judaism as a source of New Covenant learning. From the Jewish point of view, a Gentile or the “Goyim” is anyone who is not Jewish. Even if you are a Jew who has accepted Y’shua as your Messiah, you are still labeled a Christian. Anti-Semitism has raised its ugly head many time in the world and continues to do so. However, it rarely raises its head from Christianity. More often it comes from the Gentile population that are basically the unredeemed people in the world. One area that is difficult to understand in the Catholic Church that has clearly taken an anti-Semitic view for years. In recent years, their stance has softened toward Israel especially after Pope John Paul visited Israel. Other groups such as the Lutherans of Martin Luther’s time followed suit. However, in this modern day, most hatred for Jewish people comes from without not from within. That is not to say that there are not pockets of anti-Jewish sentiment within the church (The Body of Christ), but Christianity has, in these latter days, become a friend of Israel and of most Jewish people. I do believe that Dr. Sternberg has produced a manuscript that gives glory to the Almighty God. He did it in the early 1990’s where I was able to gain access to it. It changed my life. I, Robert Brown, now the Rabbi/Pastor of Hope of Israel Messianic Synagogue in Terre Haute Indiana, found this writing and a set of cassette tapes through a friend in Arkansas in 1996. It floored me. I thought that my Jewish identity was gone forever, hearing virtually nothing from the pulpit about Judaism since I was redeemed unto God on December 31, 1983. I found Y’shua in a small Baptist church in Knox, Indiana on that New Year’s Eve. My life changed forever. It took many years of toiling in a secular job to finally realize the call upon my life. I can now say that I heard many voices try to wake me up to the fact that I was suited for the work of the Kingdom. However, it wasn’t until 2001 that I attended a service at a local Baptist church in Madisonville, Louisiana that I surrender to preach the Gospel. Immediately, our Lord intervened in my life and began to clean out the residue of sins that I had hidden away. Now, in 2007, my wife of 23 years, Delilah, who led me to the Lord in 1983, surrendered herself to leave the daily grind in the world and surrender herself to join me in the ministry our Lord has created. We will say now that we were obviously created for His service but only recently joined together as one to be His servants. Now, we find ourselves in Terre Haute Indiana leading a Messianic congregation and teaching the Jewish roots of our faith in Messiah Y’shua. We hope that your faith will grow as ours has from this teaching. We have worked diligently to add our insight to Dr. Sternberg’s manuscript. We have added more Scriptures, more research including Jewish Scripture interpretations, some Hebrew readings and comments from Hebrew scholars, if only to point out how Israel has missed the mark that is Y’shua, their Messiah. So. Lets get started. One note: wherever possible, I have used the King James Version of Scripture unlike Dr. Sternberg who chose the New American Standard Version. However, from time to time I will use other versions and make sure that I note what version of Scripture I’ve used instead of the King James Version. Page 1 There are two genealogies of Y’shua found in the New Covenant. The first is Matthew 1:1- 17 and the other is Luke 3:23-38. There is information in both of these for us to see Israel and the coming of its Messiah. In Matthew 1:6, we read, And Jesse begat David the king; and David the King begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; In Isaiah 11:1, we read “ But a shoot shall grow out of the stump of Jesse (Y’shai in Hebrew)” HET (this is the abbreviation I use for the Hebrew-English TaNaKH). This David, King of Israel is the last generation of the first fourteen generations. Therefore, from Abraham to David is fourteen generations that we’ll cal the Era of Promise. By the way, TANAKH is an anachronism for Torah, Neviim and Khetuvim. Torah contains the first five books of the Bible. Neviim are the prophets such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and many others. The Khetuvim are the writings. They include the Psalms, Proverbs, Ezra, Nehemiah, Daniel and others. Therefore, we recognize the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, all 66 books. All of them are the Word of God and according to 2 Timothy 3:16, “All Scripture is given by the inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness”. King David produces King Solomon. In Matthew 1: 6-11 we see the next 14 generations, 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Rehoboam; and Rehoboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: This era might be called the Era of Failure. The last era prior to Messiah’s appearance on the earth is called the Era of Preparation. From 586 B.C. until Messiah’s birth in approximately 6 B.C. we as Christians have only bits and pieces given to us. The Bible does record through Ezra and Nehemiah (found in the writings) the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem that was destroyed in 586 B.C. by the Babylonians. Of important note is that the destruction of the First Temple in 586 B.C and the Second Tewmple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. both occurred on Tish B’Av or the 9th of Av. This is a disastrous day for Israel. We’ll look into this important fact a little later in the study. But the Bible records almost nothing that happened from 400 B.C., the close of the Book of Malachi until the Messiah’s appearance. This can be called the Silent Years. From this date until now, no other Hebrew books became canonized. There were other writings, however, the process of canonization eliminated them. Some are found in the Catholic Apochrypha, but have not been found to be acceptable either by the Rabbis or the Christian leadership. Daniel’s writings were classified by the Rabbis as “writings”, no longer including these writings as belonging to the classification of Prophet. His writings had already prophesied about this period. Daniel’s prophecies became very controversial because he had spoken of Messiah in many different ways, much of which came to pass. Isaiah and Jeremiah also prophesied about events that would take place during this period of time as well. Page 2 Because we have learned little about these silent years, we are in the dark about events that occurred that had an impact on the coming of Israel’s Messiah. In about 400 B.C Israel was being ruled by Persia. It is easy to be idolaters when someone is ruling over you. If they don’t insist on your following their gods, they intermingle with you and breakdown your society. Similar to this was the slavery of black people who served others and had their society and therefore their natural growth as a people distressed and deterred.. It has been in the rebuilding stage for centuries. Judaism was different in that they had 1000 years of history through Moses and the Patriarchs. The Word of Adonai was given through them and there was always a remnant that God kept in play to protect His Word. To find out how Israel went from being an idolatrous society to a devout people who sought to follow God’s Word, we have to go back to their dispersion to Babylon that was finalized in 586 B.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parshat Tzav
    Parshat Tzav Shabbat HaGadol 8 Nissan 5778 / March 24, 2018 Daf Yomi: Avodah Zara 68; Nach Yomi: 2 Shmuel 11 Weekly Dvar Torah A project of the NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL SPONSORED BY THE HENRY, BERTHA AND EDWARD ROTHMAN FOUNDATION ROCHESTER, NY,CLEVELAND, OHIO, CIRCLEVILLE, OHIO Just One Speck Rabbi Shlomo Hochberg Mara D'atra, Young Israel of Jamaica Estates, NY In memory of my beloved father, Rabbi Dr. Hillel Hochberg, z”tl, HaRav Hillel ben Yeshayahu Eliyahu, who passed away Erev Pesach, 14 Nissan 5752. The poem, Chasal Siddur Pesach, popularly known to us as the Nirtzah component of the Hagaddah, actually comprises just the last four lines of a lengthy Halachic Piyyut composed by the Gaon, Rav Yosef Tuv Elem. It is to be said on the morning of Shabbat HaGadol. The Piyyut, Elokai Haruchos L’chol Basar, details the numerous regulations of Pesach preparation. Among the Halachot cited, are the laws of kashering utensils for Pesach, in which Rav Yosef Tuv Elem notes regarding “knives that were used with chometz meals, it is best to make them like new.” The Rav, Moreinu Verabeinu Harav Hagaon Rav Yosef Dov Haleivi Soloveitchik, zt”l, explained that this idea of making them like new is actually a special rule of kashering chometz utensils for Pesach (similar to utensils of Kedoshim, of ritual sacrifices) which does not apply to kashering utensils from traif to kosher. Codified by Maimonides, this rule mandates that, when kashering utensils by hag’alah (purging), the traif utensil becomes kosher as soon as it has been dipped into boiling water.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Maot Chitim II. Ta'anit Bechorim, Fast of the Firstborns III. Chametz
    To The Brandeis Community, Many of us have fond memories of preparing for the holiday of Pesach (Passover), and our family's celebration of the holiday. Below is a basic outline of the major halakhic issues for Pesach this year. If anyone has questions they should be in touch with me at h​[email protected].​ In addition to these guidelines, a number of resources are available online from the major kashrut agencies: ● Orthodox Union: h​ttp://oukosher.org/passover/ ○ a pdf of the glossy magazine that’s been seen around campus can be found h​ere ● Chicago Rabbinical Council: l​ink ● Star-K: l​ink Best wishes for a Chag Kasher ve-Sameach, Rabbi David, Ariel, Havivi, and Tiffy Pardo Please note: Since we are all spending Pesach all over the world (literally...I’m selling your chametz for you, I know) please use the internet to get appropriate halakhic times. I recommend m​ yzmanim.com ​or the really nifty sidebar on h​ttps://oukosher.org/passover/ I. Maot Chitim The Rema (Shulchan Aruch Orach Chayim 429) records the ancient custom of ma'ot chitim – p​roviding money for poor people to buy matzah and other supplies for Pesach. A number of tzedka organizations have special Maot Chitim drives. II. Ta’anit Bechorim, Fast of the Firstborns Erev Pesach is the fast of the firstborns, to commemorate the fact that the Jewish firstborns were spared during m​ akat bechorot ​(the slaying of the firstborns). T​his year the fast is observed on Friday April 3 (14 Nissan) beginning at alot hashachar (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesach Status of Enriched White Rice Ask Ou
    ww ww VOL. y h / NO. 7 IYAR 5771 / MAY 2011 s xc THEDaf a K ashrus a monthlyH newsletter for th e o U r a bb inic field representative DAF NOTES On Sunday, March 27, for the first time, the Harry H. Beren ASK OU OUTREACH Kashrut Shiurim were presented to the Sephardic community at Bnei Shaare Zion in Brooklyn, NY. The OU Poskim, Rav Hershel Schachter and Rav Yisroel Belsky, both discussed the current Pesach status of enriched white rice for those who are permitted to eat Kitniyot on Pesach. These discussions sparked much interest in the Sephardic community. Although by now, Pesach is behind us, the Daf feels it important to share with its readers the research Rabbi Gavriel Price has made on this subject in the article below, as well as the accompanying Teshuva written by Rav Schachter Shlita. Rav Schachter writes in his Teshuva that the potential Chametz in rice that is produced by several major US manufacturers would be Botul before Pesach. How- ever, it is proper for Sephardim to wash the rice to remove the possible Chametz in the added vitamins. It is preferable for Sephardim to use any unprocessed brown rice or white rice with an acceptable Kosher L’Pesach certification as found in Eretz Yisroel, for those permitted to eat Kitniyot. Please refer to the Teshuva for the reasons Rav Schachter gives for these Psokim. Parboiled, pre-cooked, boil-in-a-bag, and converted rice are either pesach statUs naturally enriched or use a special method of enrichment that will of enriched white rice not be discussed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem Between Segregation and Integration: Reading Urban Space Through the Eyes of Justice Gad Frumkin
    chapter 8 Jerusalem between Segregation and Integration: Reading Urban Space through the Eyes of Justice Gad Frumkin Y. Wallach Introduction Jerusalem is seen as an archetypal example of a divided city, where extreme ethno-national polarization is deep rooted in a long history of segregation. In this chapter I challenge this perception by re-examining urban dynamics of late Ottoman and British Mandate Jerusalem, while questioning the manner in which urban segregation is theorized and understood. In the past few decades, there has been a reinvigorated scholarly discus- sion of urban segregation, driven by the challenges of difference and diversity.1 Entrenched segregation between different groups (defined by race, ethnicity, religion or class), or the “parallel lives” of different communities, living side by side with little contact, are seen to undermine the multicultural model of the late twentieth century. At the same time, mechanistic models of integration through urban mixing are increasingly challenged, and it is no longer accepted as evident that segregation is always undesirable. Nor is it obvious that everyday contact between different communities necessarily helps to engender greater understanding and dialogue. Scholars have been debating how to locate the discussion of urban encounter and segregation in the lived experience of the city. Writing on this topic suffers from the idealization of urban cosmopoli- tanism, on the one hand, or, conversely, describing segregation in overdeter- mined terms. To avoid this double pitfall, closer attention to the historical and spatial context is necessary, as well as close examination of socioeconomic real- ities. One suggestion, that I follow in this chapter, is to focus on life histories.2 By 1 This chapter forms part of ‘Conflict in Cities and the Contested Stated’ project, funded by the esrc’s Large Grants Programme (res-060-25-0015).
    [Show full text]
  • One of My Old Ambitions Was to Put out an English Version of Rabbeinu
    One of my old ambitions was to put out an English version of Rabbeinu Chayim HaLevi al HoRambam that made the beauty of Brisker lomdus accessible to those with no yeshiva background – the ArtScroll Rav Chayyim. That’s unlikely to happen at this stage (and perhaps ArtScroll has already found an author), but I thank Ethan Hauser for sending me back to Rav Chayyim this week, and here’s a very rough, and much less accessible, version of what might have been:) 1. Rambam in Laws of Chametz and Matzah 1:3 One does not get lashes for violating lo yeiraeh and lo yimatzei1 unless one acquired chametz on Pesach or else caused something to become chametz, so that one does an action in order to violate, but if one had chametz prior to Pesach, and was not mevaer2 it, but rather left it under one’s authority, even though he violated the two DO NOTs mentioned above, he is not liable to lashes under Biblical law, because he did not do an action in order to violate (lo asah bo maaseh). A. How can Rambam claim that one gets lashes for violating lo yeiraeh and lo yimatzei under any circumstances?! The Talmud on Pesachim 95a says explicitly that these DO NOTs are consider to be nitak to the DO (laaseh) of tashbisu, and the rule is that any DO NOT that is nitak to a DO is not subject to lashes!? a. Other versions of Pesachim 95a make no mention of the issue of nitak laaseh, and rather declare these DO NOT’s to be DO NOT’s not involving actions, perfectly in accordance with Rambam.
    [Show full text]
  • Passover 2021 Guidelines Elebrating Passover This Year Will Once Again Not Be in an Ideal Form
    passover 2021 guidelines elebrating Passover this year will once again not be in an ideal form. Hopefully, the challenges presented by COVID-19 will open doors to creativity and the learning of new skills. In addition to Cour civic legal requirements, as always, it is crucial that we take seriously our obligation as Jews to safeguard our lives and the lives of others. This year, Pesach is immediately preceded by Shabbat. As a result, some practices are modified, especially when and what we eat on Shabbat. Selling Chametz / Ma’ot Chittin Adath Israel is once again pleased to assist our members in the selling of their chametz. As the synagogue office is closed, please do not mail or fax chametz selling forms. Rather, all chametz sales should be completed online HERE. It is a mitzvah prior to Passover to provide tzedakah so that those in need can appropriately celebrate the holiday. This year, there is already a great need within our community. Please support Toronto’s vulnerable Jews by donating HERE. New Clothing Many have the custom of purchasing new clothing prior to Passover. This practice should be suspended. Siyyum Bechorot The virtual Siyyum Bechorot will take place on Thursday, March 25. Services begin at 7:30 a.m., with the Siyyum starting 8:15am. We are honoured that Dr. Jack Lipinsky will once again lead the teaching. Click HERE to log in. Searching for Chametz The search for Chametz should take place on Thursday night, preceded by the opening blessing. If you plan to consume chametz during Shabbat, then do not recite the kol chamirah closing declaration.
    [Show full text]
  • Summaries of Sefer Vayikra
    Overview of Sefer VaYikra At the end of Vayikra, in Parshas Bechulosai, a convenant is made with the Jewish people over Brachos and Kelalos. There is a case to say that not just the Brachos and Klalors, but the who e of VaYikra reflects the establishment of this convenant. Sefer Bereishis is the book of creation – the roots of the nation, ending with the Avos. Sefer Shemos is the book of the birth of the nation. Vayikra is the consolidation of that birth into an ongoing covenant, by completing and affirming the Sinai experience1. Finally, in our Parsha, the Torah makes explicit what has been the theme throughout – a Bris, with its blessings and curses. This is why, when Shmittah is given in this book2, it is stressed that it was given at Har Sinai, and why this is followed by our Parsha, where the Bris is made explicit3. VaYikra talks primarily about Korbanos, although there is a large section about purity and impurity, in particular the metzorah. It also makes sense that the Yom Kippur Avoda is in this sefer, for this took place in the Beis Hamikdash and involved several korbanos. Yet there are many other Mitzvos here – all those dealing with sexual immorality; interpersonal Mitzvos such as loving and rebuking your neighbor, not hating nor taking revenge; so too Shemittah and Yovel and Kiddush and Chillul HaSh-m all appear in Sefer VaYikra. The place of all of these in this Sefer is not clear. gives us ספר ויקרא ,The Ramban4 states that, now that the Mishkan is built the means to keep it (and later the Beis HaMikdash) and prevent it from being destroyed5.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec
    Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 Author(s): Lewis Bayles Paton Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Apr., 1913), pp. 1-53 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259319 . Accessed: 09/04/2012 16:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE Volume XXXII Part I 1913 Israel's Conquest of Canaan Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 LEWIS BAYLES PATON HARTFORD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY problem of Old Testament history is more fundamental NO than that of the manner in which the conquest of Canaan was effected by the Hebrew tribes. If they came unitedly, there is a possibility that they were united in the desert and in Egypt. If their invasions were separated by wide intervals of time, there is no probability that they were united in their earlier history. Our estimate of the Patriarchal and the Mosaic traditions is thus conditioned upon the answer that we give to this question.
    [Show full text]
  • EREV PESACH WHICH OCCURS on SHABBOS: a Practical Guide
    Rabbi Aaron Kraft Dayan EREV PESACH WHICH OCCURS ON SHABBOS: A Practical Guide When Erev Pesach coincides with Shabbos, we benefit from Friday (13th of Nisan; this year, March 26, 2021) or Shabbos having a restful and spiritually uplifting day leading into the (Erev Pesach; this year, March 27, 2021)? The Shulchan Aruch Seder night. However, this infrequent calendrical occurrence (ibid.) says to burn most of the chametz on Friday, leaving some also raises practical questions relating to the halachos of Erev for the Shabbos meals (see next section). Whatever chametz Pesach1 as well as to the proper fulfilment of the mitzvos of remains after the meals should be broken into small crumbs Shabbos. This article will address these concerns. and disposed of in a manner that destroys it completely but does not violate the laws of Shabbos. Preferred methods include flushing the crumbs down the toilet, feeding them to TAANIS BECHOROS a pet, or throwing them into a garbage outside of the house. While on a regular Erev Pesach, firstborn males customarily Larger quantities may also be given to a non-Jew (but you fast, fasting is prohibited on Shabbos either because it detracts should not directly ask the non-Jew to remove more than from the mitzvah of oneg Shabbos or because an obligation to a meal’s worth of chametz from your house – see Shulchan eat three meals exists (OC 288:1 and Beur Halacha). Therefore, Aruch 444:4 and Mishna Berura 444:18-20). the Beis Yosef (OC 470) cites opposing positions whether to According to the Shulchan Aruch (OC 444:2), the burning observe the taanis on Thursday or not at all this year.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Teshuva the Winding Path of Penitence and Where It Leads
    A History of Teshuva The Winding Path of Penitence and Where it Leads Shabbat Shuvah 5780 The Jewish Center Rabbi Yosie Levine לזכר נשמת הרב שמואל צבי בן יוסף הלוי 1 The following is excerpted and adapted from a story that appeared in Tablet Magazine in 2018 by Pini Dunner: Yechezkel Taub was born on October 7, 1895, in a small town in Poland. His father, Rabbi Yaakov Taub, was the “Rebbe” of Yabłona, a small town near Warsaw that was home to a vibrant Orthodox Jewish community. When R. Yaakov died in 1920, Yechezkel, 24 years old, suddenly found himself at the head of a prestigious and wealthy Hasidic sect. He took his position seriously and inspired his followers. In 1924, he was persuaded by a cousin, who was passionate about the land of Israel, that the future for Jews lay there rather than in Eastern Europe. With the support of his wealthier Hasidim, he and a few hundred of his followers moved to Palestine. They and another group of Hasidim were welcomed by Jewish officials and ended up buying land in the hills in the north of the country, close to Haifa. Their settlement became known as Kfar Hasidim. The new arrivals were welcomed with open arms. Notables came to see the remarkable phenomenon of Hasidic farmers for themselves. But very soon, things began to badly. There were disputes with the local Arab population. The Kishon River overflowed, flooding the valley and turning it into a swamp. There was an outbreak of malaria and a number of the settlers died.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Perspective on Paul: Its Basic Tenets, History, and Presuppositions
    TMSJ 16/2 (Fall 2005) 189-243 THE NEW PERSPECTIVE ON PAUL: ITS BASIC TENETS, HISTORY, AND PRESUPPOSITIONS F. David Farnell Associate Professor of New Testament Recent decades have witnessed a change in views of Pauline theology. A growing number of evangelicals have endorsed a view called the New Perspective on Paul (NPP) which significantly departs from the Reformation emphasis on justification by faith alone. The NPP has followed in the path of historical criticism’s rejection of an orthodox view of biblical inspiration, and has adopted an existential view of biblical interpretation. The best-known spokesmen for the NPP are E. P. Sanders, James D. G. Dunn, and N. T. Wright. With only slight differences in their defenses of the NPP, all three have adopted “covenantal nomism,” which essentially gives a role in salvation to works of the law of Moses. A survey of historical elements leading up to the NPP isolates several influences: Jewish opposition to the Jesus of the Gospels and Pauline literature, Luther’s alleged antisemitism, and historical-criticism. The NPP is not actually new; it is simply a simultaneous convergence of a number of old aberrations in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. * * * * * When discussing the rise of the New Perspective on Paul (NPP), few theologians carefully scrutinize its historical and presuppositional antecedents. Many treat it merely as a 20th-century phenomenon; something that is relatively “new” arising within the last thirty or forty years. They erroneously isolate it from its long history of development. The NPP, however, is not new but is the revival of an old ideology that has been around for the many centuries of church history: the revival of works as efficacious for salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • KMS Sefer Minhagim
    KMS Sefer Minhagim Kemp Mill Synagogue Silver Spring, Maryland Version 1.60 February 2017 KMS Sefer Minhagim Version 1.60 Table of Contents 1. NOSACH ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 RITE FOR SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 RITE FOR SELICHOT ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 NOSACH FOR KADDISH ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 PRONUNCIATION ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.5 LUACH ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. WHO MAY SERVE AS SH’LIACH TZIBUR .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 SH’LIACH TZIBUR MUST BE APPOINTED .................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS TO SERVE AS SH’LIACH TZIBUR .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]