DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for Working with Irish Sign Language / English Interpreters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for Working with Irish Sign Language / English Interpreters Guidelines for Working with Irish Sign Language / English Interpreters Table of Contents 1. Irish Sign Language (ISL) and the Deaf Community ............................................................................................... 5 2. Providing Interpreters – Legislation and National Guidelines ............................................................................... 7 United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ..................................................................... 7 Irish Sign Language Act 2017 ................................................................................................................................... 7 Health Services ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Court Proceedings and Garda Interviews ............................................................................................................... 11 Court Proceedings ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Garda Stations ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Equal Status Acts ................................................................................................................................................... 12 Education .............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Disability Act 2005 ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Employment Equality Act ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Northern Ireland and ISL Recognition .................................................................................................................... 15 3. Interpreters: Facts and Figures .......................................................................................................................... 15 What is the correct job title? ................................................................................................................................. 15 Where are interpreters trained?............................................................................................................................ 16 How many interpreters are there in Ireland? ......................................................................................................... 16 How many interpreters work part-time or full-time? ............................................................................................. 16 Do interpreters do further training? ...................................................................................................................... 17 Is there a register or professional association of interpreters? ............................................................................... 17 Register of Irish Sign Language Interpreters ....................................................................................................... 17 Interpreter Professional Associations ................................................................................................................. 18 What is a ‘Deaf Interpreter’? ................................................................................................................................. 18 Guidelines for Working with ISL / English Interpreters 10 June 2021 4. Sourcing, Booking, and Paying for Interpreters .................................................................................................. 19 Where can I get an interpreter? ............................................................................................................................ 19 Freelance Interpreters ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Interpreting Agencies ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Referral Services and Information Points ........................................................................................................... 21 Staff interpreters ............................................................................................................................................... 21 What notice do I need to give? .............................................................................................................................. 22 Can we ask an interpreter to volunteer for an interpreting assignment? ............................................................... 23 How much do interpreters cost? ........................................................................................................................... 23 How does the payment process work? .................................................................................................................. 23 Are there grants or funding available elsewhere? .................................................................................................. 25 5. Picking the Right Interpreter .............................................................................................................................. 26 Which Interpreter should I Use? ............................................................................................................................ 26 What if the interpreter knows the Deaf person?.................................................................................................... 28 Should the Deaf service user be able to select who they want to interpret? .......................................................... 29 Should I tell the Deaf service user who the interpreter will be? ............................................................................. 29 Should I book the same interpreter for the next assignment?................................................................................ 29 Will the interpreter have gone through Garda Vetting? ......................................................................................... 30 Will the interpreter have Professional Indemnity Insurance? ................................................................................. 30 6. Different Arrangements for Interpreting ............................................................................................................ 30 Interpreters working alone .................................................................................................................................... 30 Interpreter Team (2 hearing interpreters) ............................................................................................................. 30 Interpreter Team (3+ hearing interpreters)............................................................................................................ 31 Interpreter Team (Deaf / hearing) ......................................................................................................................... 31 Remote (Video) Interpreting ................................................................................................................................. 31 Types of Remote Interpreting ............................................................................................................................ 31 Remote Interpreting - General ........................................................................................................................... 32 Quality Issues .................................................................................................................................................... 32 Deaf Service User – Comfort and Consent .......................................................................................................... 33 Remote Meetings .............................................................................................................................................. 33 Suitability of VRI ................................................................................................................................................ 34 IRIS (Irish Remote Interpreting Service) .............................................................................................................. 35 7. Preparing the Interpreter .................................................................................................................................. 38 Why is preparation important? ............................................................................................................................. 38 Can I trust the interpreter to keep our information confidential? .......................................................................... 39 What does the interpreter need in advance of an assignment? ............................................................................. 39 What does the interpreter need to know about the Deaf person? ......................................................................... 40 What do I do when the interpreter arrives? ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Learn to Use Signpuddle 1.0 on The
    Some Dictionaries: ™ SignPuddle Online American Sign Language www.SignBank.org/signpuddle Arabic Sign Languages Brazilian Sign Language British Sign Language Colombian Sign Language Czech Sign Language Danish Sign Language Finnish Sign Language Flemish Sign Language French Sign Language German Sign Language Greek Sign Language International Sign Languages Irish Sign Language Italian Sign Language Japanese Sign Language Maltese Sign Language Come Splash in a Sign Puddle! Netherlands Sign Language 1. FREE on the web! Nicaraguan Sign Language Northern Ireland Sign Language 2. Search Sign Language Dictionaries. Norwegian Sign Language 3. Create your own signs and add them. Polish Sign Language 4. Send email in SignWriting®. Quebec Sign Language 5. Translate words to SignWriting. Spanish Sign Language 6. Create documents with SignWriting. Swiss Sign Languages 7. Have fun sharing signs on the internet! Taiwan Sign Language ...and others... http://www.SignBank.org/signpuddle Search by Words 1. Click on the icon: Search by Words 2. In the Search field: Type a word or a letter. 3. Press the Search button. 4. All the signs that use that word will list for you in SignWriting. 5. You can then copy the sign, or drag and drop it, into other documents. http://www.SignBank.org/signpuddle Search by Signs 1. Click on the icon: Search by Signs 2. In the Search field: Type a word or a letter. 3. Press the Search button. 4. The signs will list in small size. 5. Click on the small sign you want, and a larger version will appear... http://www.SignBank.org/signpuddle Search by Symbols 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Inclusive Education in Europe and in the Republic of Moldova: Reasonable Accommodation, Access to Education and Non-Discrimination
    Study on inclusive education in Europe and in the Republic of Moldova: reasonable accommodation, access to education and non-discrimination http://partnership-governance-eu.coe.int Partnership for Good Governance Parteneriat pentru buna guvernare The joint European Union and Council of Europe project „Supporting national efforts for prevention and combating discrimination in the Republic of Moldova”, part of the Partnership for Good Governance programme Study on inclusive education in Europe and in the Republic of Moldova: reasonable accommodation, access to education and non-discrimination Prepared by Frédérique Ast, Council of Europe consultant Chisinau, 2018 1 This document has been produced as part of the project „Supporting national efforts for prevention and combating discrimination in the Republic of Moldova” co-funded by the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of either party. © Council of Europe 2018. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Content ______________________________________________________ Acknowledgments 4 CHAPTER I: THE INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS 6 I. The UN framework 6 II. The European standards 8 A. EU Law 8 B. The Council of Europe Conventions 9 C. Selected European Court of Human Rights and European Committee of Social Rights’s Case-lawă 11 CHAPTER II: BEST PRACTICES IN EUROPE 15 I. AUSTRIA 16 II. BELGIUM 16 III. CZECH REPUBLIC 17 IV. FINLAND 18 V. FRANCE 18 VI. GERMANY 19 VII. LITHUANIA 20 VIII. MONTENEGRO 21 IX.PORTUGAL 21 X. SLOVAKIA 23 XI. SWEDEN 23 XII. UNITED KINGDOM 24 CHAPTER III: THE SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 26 I.
    [Show full text]
  • What Corpus-Based Research on Negation in Auslan and PJM Tells Us About Building and Using Sign Language Corpora
    What Corpus-Based Research on Negation in Auslan and PJM Tells Us About Building and Using Sign Language Corpora Anna Kuder1, Joanna Filipczak1, Piotr Mostowski1, Paweł Rutkowski1, Trevor Johnston2 1Section for Sign Linguistics, Faculty of the Polish Studies, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland 2Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2109 {anna.kuder, j.filipczak, piotr.mostowski, p.rutkowski}@uw.edu.pl, [email protected] Abstract In this paper, we would like to discuss our current work on negation in Auslan (Australian Sign Language) and PJM (Polish Sign Language, polski język migowy) as an example of experience in using sign language corpus data for research purposes. We describe how we prepared the data for two detailed empirical studies, given similarities and differences between the Australian and Polish corpus projects. We present our findings on negation in both languages, which turn out to be surprisingly similar. At the same time, what the two corpus studies show seems to be quite different from many previous descriptions of sign language negation found in the literature. Some remarks on how to effectively plan and carry out the annotation process of sign language texts are outlined at the end of the present paper, as they might be helpful to other researchers working on designing a corpus. Our work leads to two main conclusions: (1) in many cases, usage data may not be easily reconciled with intuitions and assumptions about how sign languages function and what their grammatical characteristics are like, (2) in order to obtain representative and reliable data from large-scale corpora one needs to plan and carry out the annotation process very thoroughly.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncrpd Implementation in Europe - a Deaf Perspective
    UNCRPD IMPLEMENTATION IN EUROPE - A DEAF PERSPECTIVE The series The EU’s ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons UNCRPD IMPLEMENTATION with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in 2010 means that there is now an obligation to IN EUROPE - A DEAF PERSPECTIVE implement the enshrined rights in a timely manner. The legal implications of the UNCRPD have been widely discussed at institutional level. As a result, it has become increasingly evident that this is a new and complex area where interna- Article 27: tional, European and national orders of law overlap. Work and Employment This publication aims to contribute to, and provide possible interpretations of, the implementation of the UNCRPD with regards to deaf citizens, including sign language users and hard of hearing people. Each contribution in the series will explore a specific UNCRPD article, from both an academic and best practice perspective, and at all levels, from European to regional. Article 27: Work and Employment This second book in the series focuses in particular on Article 27 of the UNCRPD. Work and employment are explored from various angles, including the right to reasonable accommodation, as well as labour and trade union rights. The diverse chapters represent a range of disciplines and professionals; their backgrounds span from political and institutional stakeholders and represent- Editors: atives, to academic scholars and NGO representatives. In particular, the authors explore how the rights enshrined in Article 27 are applicable to deaf and hard of hearing
    [Show full text]
  • IFHOHYP Newsletter 1/2007
    IFHOHYP NEWS Summer 2007 The International Federation of Hard of Hearing Young People Magazine New Trends in Educating Hearing Impaired People by Svetoslava Saeva (Bulgaria) In the period 21-25 March 2007 an International Contact Seminar New Trends in Educating Hearing Impaired People was held for the first time in Bratislava, Slovakia (http://akademia.exs.sk). The seminar is realized as a main activity of a project of the European Culture Society, Bratislava and is financially supported by: Youth Programme – Action 5, Open Society Fund and Austrian Culture Forum. All activities were interpreted into English, Slovak, Slovak Sign language and International Sign. The seminar was under the auspices of Mr. Dušan Čaplovič – Deputy Prime Minister of the Government of Slovakia for Knowledge-Based Society, European Affairs, Human Rights and Minorities and Mrs. Viera Tomanová – Minister of Labour, Social Affairs and Family in Slovakia. The seminar was divided into two main parts concerning activities in the whole period. Svetoslava (in the right) The first part was on 22 March when Open Public Seminar was realized in the capital of Slovakia – Bratislava. There were more than 110 people from different countries that took part in the seminar. Many of the participants were hearing impaired. There were many interesting presentations about technologies and innovations in education and preparation for universities as well as for the labour market of hearing impaired and deaf people. Mr. Andrej Buday – a Slovak project manager and president of the Association of Driving Schools in Slovak Republic shared very valuable experience about teaching deaf and hearing impaired people how to drive correctly and safely.
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholders' Views on Use of Sign Language Alone As a Medium Of
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Vol.33, No.1, 2018 Stakeholders’ Views on Use of Sign Language Alone as a Medium of Instruction for the Hearing Impaired in Zambian Primary Schools Mandyata Joseph, Kamukwamba Kapansa Lizzie, School of Education, University of Zambia ([email protected]) Abstract The study examined views of stakeholders on the use of Sign Language as a medium of instruction in the learning of hearing impaired in primary schools of Lusaka, Zambia. A case study design supported by qualitative methods was used. The sample size was 57, consisting of teachers, pupils, curriculum specialist, education standards officers, lecturers and advocators on the rights of persons with disabilities. Purposive sampling techniques to selected the sample, interview and focused group discussion guides were tools for data collection. The study revealed significant differences in views of stakeholders on use of Sign Language alone as medium of instruction. While most participants felt sign language alone was ideal for learning, others believed learners needed exposure to total communication (combination of oral and sign language) to learn better. Those who felt using sign language alone was better, believed the practice had more positive effects on learning and that use of oral language, total communication often led to confusion in classroom communication among learners with hearing impairments. Participants who opposed use of sign language alone were of the view teachers: were ill-prepared; signs were limited in scope; education system lacked instructional language policy and learning environment were inappropriate to support use of sign language alone in the learning process. The study recommended strengthening of training of sign language teachers and introduction of sign language as an academic subject before it can be used as the sole medium of classroom instruction in the Zambian primary schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Language Legislation in the European Union 4
    Sign Language Legislation in the European Union Mark Wheatley & Annika Pabsch European Union of the Deaf Brussels, Belgium 3 Sign Language Legislation in the European Union All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted by any person or entity, including internet search engines or retailers, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, scanning or by any information storage and retrieval system without the prior written permission of the authors. ISBN 978-90-816-3390-1 © European Union of the Deaf, September 2012. Printed at Brussels, Belgium. Design: Churchill’s I/S- www.churchills.dk This publication was sponsored by Significan’t Significan’t is a (Deaf and Sign Language led ) social business that was established in 2003 and its Managing Director, Jeff McWhinney, was the CEO of the British Deaf Association when it secured a verbal recognition of BSL as one of UK official languages by a Minister of the UK Government. SignVideo is committed to delivering the best service and support to its customers. Today SignVideo provides immediate access to high quality video relay service and video interpreters for health, public and voluntary services, transforming access and career prospects for Deaf people in employment and empowering Deaf entrepreneurs in their own businesses. www.signvideo.co.uk 4 Contents Welcome message by EUD President Berglind Stefánsdóttir ..................... 6 Foreword by Dr Ádám Kósa, MEP ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marcin Mizak Sign Language – a Real and Natural Language
    LUBELSKIE MATERIAŁY NEOFILOLOGICZNE NR 35, 2011 Marcin Mizak Sign Language – A Real and Natural Language 1. Introduction It seems reasonable to begin a discussion on the “realness” and “naturalness” of sign language by comparing it to other human languages of whose “real” and “natural” status there can be no doubt whatsoever. They will be our reference point in the process of establishing the status of sign language. The assumption being made in this paper is that all real and natural languages share certain characteristics with one another, that they all behave in a certain way and that certain things happen to all of them. If it transpires that the same characteristics and behaviours are also shared by sign language and that whatever happens to real and natural languages also happens to sign language then the inevitable conclusion follows: sign language is indeed a real and natural language 1. 2. The number of languages in the world One of the first things to be noticed about real and natural languages is their great number. Ethnologue: Languages of the World , one of the most reliable and comprehensive encyclopedic reference publications, catalogues in its 16 th edition of 2009 6,909 known living languages in 1 The designation “sign language,” as used in this article, refers to the languages used within communities of the deaf. American Sign Language, for example, is a sign language in this sense. Artificially devised systems, such as Signed English, or Manual English, are not sign languages in this sense. Sign Language – A Real and Natural Language 51 the world today 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Capturing the Language of the Deaf
    Linguistics Capturing the Language of the Deaf Dr. Paweł Rutkowski insight University of Warsaw magine we were born in a society in which every- one around us communicates in a language we Idon’t understand. What’s more, it’s a language we are not even able to experience with our senses. Now imagine that in spite of this, everyone expects us to master that language in order to help us live “easier,” so that we can function “normally” in society. So that we do not have to be different. This is how, in very simple terms, we can describe the situation faced by Paweł Rutkowski, the Deaf in various countries, including in Poland. Note the preference for the term Deaf (or Pol- PhD is the creator of the ish: Głusi), rather than hearing-impaired (Polish: Section for Sign niesłyszący). While the hearing community may see Linguistics at the the term hearing-impaired (or niesłyszący) as neutral, University of Warsaw. He the Deaf want to be seen through the prism of what specializes in the syntax they are, rather than what they are NOT or in terms of natural languages, of how they are perceived to be defective. Writing the with particular emphasis word Deaf (or Głusi) with a capital letter is intended to on Polish Sign Language define deafness as a major indicator of a certain cul- (PLM). He has authored tural and linguistic identity (similar to other minority or co-authored more groups in Poland, such as Silesians or Kashubians), than a hundred research publications and not to stigmatize their disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Languages
    200-210 Sign languages 200 Arık, Engin: Describing motion events in sign languages. – PSiCL 46/4, 2010, 367-390. 201 Buceva, Pavlina; Čakărova, Krasimira: Za njakoi specifiki na žestomimičnija ezik, izpolzvan ot sluchouvredeni lica. – ESOL 7/1, 2009, 73-79 | On some specific features of the sign language used by children with hearing disorders. 202 Dammeyer, Jesper: Tegnsprogsforskning : om tegnsprogets bidrag til viden om sprog. – SSS 3/2, 2012, 31-46 | Sign language research : on the contribution of sign language to the knowledge of languages | E. ab | Electronic publ. 203 Deaf around the world : the impact of language / Ed. by Gaurav Mathur and Donna Jo Napoli. – Oxford : Oxford UP, 2011. – xviii, 398 p. 204 Fischer, Susan D.: Sign languages East and West. – (34), 3-15. 205 Formational units in sign languages / Ed. by Rachel Channon ; Harry van der Hulst. – Berlin : De Gruyter Mouton ; Nijmegen : Ishara Press, 2011. – vi, 346 p. – (Sign language typology ; 3) | Not analyzed. 206 Franklin, Amy; Giannakidou, Anastasia; Goldin-Meadow, Susan: Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system. – Cognition 118/3, 2011, 398-416. 207 Gebarentaalwetenschap : een inleiding / Onder red. van Anne E. Baker ; Beppie van den Bogaerde ; Roland Pfau ; Trude Schermer. – Deventer : Van Tricht, 2008. – 328 p. 208 Kendon, Adam: A history of the study of Australian Aboriginal sign languages. – (50), 383-402. 209 Kendon, Adam: Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia : cultural, semi- otic and communicative perspectives. – Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 2013. – 562 p. | First publ. 1988; cf. 629. 210 Kudła, Marcin: How to sign the other : on attributive ethnonyms in sign languages. – PFFJ 2014, 81-92 | Pol.
    [Show full text]
  • [Applied Linguistics Review] Investigating Deaf Childrens Plural
    Applied Linguistics Review 2016; 7(2): 117–147 Ruth Swanwick*, Sue Wright and Jackie Salter Investigating deaf children’s plural and diverse use of sign and spoken languages in a super diverse context DOI 10.1515/applirev-2016-0009 Abstract: This paper examines the meaning of plurality and diversity with respect to deaf children’s sign and spoken language exposure and repertoire within a super diverse context. Data is drawn from a small-scale project that took place in the North of England in a Local Authority (LA) site for deaf education. The project documen- ted the language landscape of this site and gathered five individual case studies of deaf children to examine their plural and diverse language practices at home and at school. Analysis of the language landscape and case studies from this context is undertaken in order to define and exemplify deaf children’slanguagepluralityand diversity in terms of context and individual experience. Concepts of repertoire are explored with particular reference to the unique type of translanguaging that the plural use of sign and spoken languages affords. Implications of these preliminary insights are discussed in terms of the development of methodologies that are sensitive to the particular translanguaging practices of deaf children, and approaches to pedagogy that are appropriately nuanced and responsive to deaf children’s language plurality and diversity. Keywords: deaf,bimodal,bilingual,plurality,diversity,translanguaging,repertoire 1 Introduction The aim of this paper is to explore language plurality and diversity in deaf children’s lives and to develop an understanding of how deaf children deploy their sign and spoken language repertoires for meaning-making at home and at school.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross-Linguistic Preference for Torso Stability in the Lexicon: Evidence from 24 Sign Languages
    Swarthmore College Works Linguistics Faculty Works Linguistics 2016 A Cross-Linguistic Preference For Torso Stability In The Lexicon: Evidence From 24 Sign Languages N. Sanders Donna Jo Napoli Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-linguistics Part of the Linguistics Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation N. Sanders and Donna Jo Napoli. (2016). "A Cross-Linguistic Preference For Torso Stability In The Lexicon: Evidence From 24 Sign Languages". Sign Language And Linguistics. Volume 19, Issue 2. 197-231. DOI: 10.1075/sll.19.2.02san https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-linguistics/218 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 A cross-linguistic preference for torso stability in the lexicon: Evidence from 24 sign languages Nathan Sandersa and Donna Jo Napolib aDepartment of Linguistics, Haverford College / bDepartment of Linguistics, Swarthmore College When the arms move in certain ways, they can cause the torso to twist or rock. Such extraneous torso movement is undesirable, especially during sign language communication, when torso position may carry linguistic significance, so we expend effort to resist it when it is not intended. This so-called “reactive effort” has only recently been identified by Sanders and Napoli (2016), but their preliminary work on three genetically unrelated languages suggests that the effects of reactive effort can be observed cross-linguistically by examination of sign language lexicons.
    [Show full text]