Karwar F-Register As on 31-03-2019
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E.1 Introduction the Government Of
Consultancy Services for Four Laning of existing DRAFT FEASIBILITY REPORT Goa/Karnataka Border-Panaji Goa Section of NH-4A from Km 84.000 to Km 153.075 in the state of Goa on BOT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Toll) basis under NHDP-III (Anmod to Panaji Section) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E.1 Introduction The Government of India has envisaged to create a world-class infrastructure facility, to boost the economic development in the country, for which National Highways Au- thority of India (NHAI) plays key role. NHAI has been entrusted to implement the de- velopment of some of the stretches of National Highways under National Highway Development Programme on EPC/BOT basis. As part of this endeavor, the Public Works Department (PWD) of Government of Goa has decided for the development of existing Goa/Karnataka Border- Panaji Goa Section of NH-4A from Km 84/000 to 153/075 on BOT (Toll) basis under NHDP-III (Anmod to Panaji section) to four Lane configuration. Public Works Department (PWD) of Goa has appointed M/s Aarvee Associates Archi- tects Engineers & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad to provide consultancy services for detailed engineering study for the above road section. The project stretch excludes following reaches: 1. From Km 118 (Kandepar) to Km 125 (Safa Maszid) 2. From Km 143.400(Ella) to Km 153.075 (Panaji). E.2 Project Description The Project Highway is a section of NH-4A(Belgaum-Anmod-Ponda-Panaji) between Anmod and Panaji, passing through villages Molem, Sangod, Dharbandora, Piliem, Tiska, Candepar, Curti, Ambegal, Veling, Boma, Banastarim, Corlim, Velha goa, Ribandar. The entire stretch of NH-4A lies in the states of Karnataka and Goa. -
Aquifer Map of Karwar Taluk, Uttara Kannada District
Aquifer Map of Karwar Taluk, Uttara Kannada District *# $+ $+ *#LAN$+DA *#*# *# ") $+ *# *# *# *# *# $+ *# *#$+ *# NANEVADA *# *# ") GF # *#$+ GF $+* $+ *# $+ *# *# ´ $+ /" # $+ * *# GF *# 1:56,000 $+ *# *# $+ *# *# $+ *# *#*# *# *# $+ *# *# TIRVAL *# *# $+ ") $+ $+ $+ *# *# $+ *# $+ GF *# *# $+ *# *# *# GF *# *# *# *# /" GF *# *# *# $+ $+ *# *# $+ GF $+ *# GOYAR *# $+ $+ ") # *#$+ *# *# *# * *#*# *# $+ $+ *# *# *#*# *# $+ *# *# *# *# $+ $+ $+ *# *# # $+ *# # $+ *# KOTE *# * $+* *# *# *# ") $+ *# *# *# $+ *# $+ GF *# # *# BARGADDE *# *# $+ $+ $+ * ") *# *# *# *# *# *# *# *# $+ *# *#*# *# *# *# # $+ $+ $+ $+ *# *# $+ *# * /" $+ $+ *#*# *# $+ *# $+ *# *# *# *# $+ $+ $+ *# *# *# *# $+ *# *# *# *# $+ $+ *# $+ *# *# *# $+ $+ *# GF *# *# *# $+ *# SHINGEVADI $+ $+ *# $+ GF ") *# $+ *#$+ # *# $+ $+ *# # *# * *# *# GF * *# *# *# *# *# *# $+ *# *# *# $+ *# $+ GF $+ *# $+ *# GF *# MAINGINI MADKARNI *# ") *# *# *# ") # GF *#$+ *# *# $+ $+ *# *# * *# *# *# $+ $+ *# $+ *# *# *# $+ *# GF *# $+ *# *# *# $+ $+ *# $+*# PATEVA$+DA*# $+ *# *## ") *# * $+ $+ PANASAGALI *# *# $+ *# $+ $+ $+ *# ") BARGI *# *# PONKADRA *# $+ ") ATRE ") /" *# $+ *# $+ *# *# ") $+ *# *# *# # $+ *# $+ $+ *# *# *# * GF HAPKARN $+ $+ *# *# $+ *# PARDANI ") # *# $+ $+ *# $+ *# *# ")*# *# *# * *# *# $+ *# $+ $+ # GOPSHITTA # *# $+ $+ *# * ") HALATE *# *# *# *# * $+ *# $+ *# *#") /" MA*#RATHAVADA *# *# BAMANTALA ") *# $+ .! *# *# *# *# *# ") $+ $+ GF *# *# *# BARNAVADA *# *# *# $+ *# *# *# SAN MUDAGERI *# ") *# $+AMBRAL *# BORE KADRA *# *# ") JARAD")I GF ") ") $+ *# *# *# *# *# BAKTIVADA -
Uttara Kannada District- Introduction 2013
Uttara Kannada District- Introduction 2013 LAND USE CHANGES WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DEVELOPMENTAL PROJECTS IN UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT Summary: Forest ecosystems in Uttara Kannada district have witnessed major transformations during the post-independence. Uttara Kannada district has the distinction of having highest forest cover among all districts of Karnataka. Land use analysis using temporal remote sensing data reveal distressing trend of deforestation in the district, evident from the reduction of evergreen - semi evergreen forest cover from 67.73% (1973) to 32.08% (2013). Taluk-wise analyses reveal similar trend for evergreen - semi evergreen forest cover during 1973 to 2013; Ankola (75.66 to 55.33%), Bhatkal (61.37 to 30.38%), Honnavar (70.63 to 35.71%), Karwar (72.26 to 59.70%), Kumta (62.89 to 29.38%), Siddapur (71.42 to 23.68), Sirsi (64.89 to 16.78), Supa (93.56 to 58.55%), Yellapur (75.28 to 18.98%), Haliyal (35.45 to 2.59%), Mundgod (2063 to 1.52). Forest cover has declined from 81.75 (1973) to 60.98% (2013) in the coastal zone, 91.45 (1973) to 59.14% (2013) in the Sahyadrian interior, and 69.26 (1973) to 16.76% (2013) in plains zone. Implementation of developmental activities without taking into account the ecological significance of ecosystems, services provided by them in meeting the livelihood of local population has resulted in the degradation of forests. These changes in the landscape structure (through large scale land use changes) have altered functional abilities of an ecosystem evident from lowered hydrological yield, disappearing perennial streams, higher instances of human –animal conflicts, declined ecosystem goods, etc. -
1 in the High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru Dated This the 08Th Day of April 2015 Before the Hon' Ble Mrs Justice B.V.Nagarathn
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08 TH DAY OF APRIL 2015 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MRS JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NOs.48996 - 49142 OF 2014 & 8829-8849 of 2015 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI RAJARAM T HEBBAR S/O TIMMANNA HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS DRAWING TEACHER HOLY ROSERY CONVENT (HIGH SCHOOL) PRABATNAGAR HONAVAR TALUK – 581 334 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 2. SHRI RAMADAS SHANKAR HEGDE S/O LATE SHANKAR HEGDE AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS HEAD MASTER (RETIRED) SREE CHENNA KESHAVA HIGH SCHOOL KARKI, HONAVAR TALUK – 581 334 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 3. SHRI GAJANANA ISHWAR BHAT S/O ISHWAR BHAT AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS CRAFT TEACHER (RETIRED-VRS) JANATA VIDYALYA ANILGOD, BERAKI PSOT HONAVAR TALUK – 581 334 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 2 4. SHRI JATTAPPA NAGAPPA NAIK S/O NAGAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS HEAD MASTER (RETIRED) JANATA VIDYALAYA MIRJAN, KODKANI KUMTA 581 343 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 5. SHRI PARAMESHWAR TIMMANNA BHAT BOMBE S/O TIMMA BHAT BOMBE AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS HEAD MASTER (RETIRED) SIDDIVINAYAKA HIGH SCHOOL KARVA,KOLEGEDDE HONAVAR 236056 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 6. SMT PRABHA P SURI D/O PADMANABHA SURI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS HEAD MISTRESS (RETIRED) SREEE CHENNA KESHAVA HIGH SCHOOL KARKI, HONAVAR TALUK – 581 341 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 7. SHRI GOVINDA KESHAVA SHET S/O KESHAV V SHET AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS LECTURER (RETIRED) JANATA VIDYALAYA COMPOSITE JUNIOR COLLEGE SIRALI, BHATKAL TALUK – 581 320 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 8. SHRI VASANTHA KRISHNA BHAT S/O KRISHNA BHAT AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS KANNADA ASST TEACHER (RETIRED) 3 SRI RAJARAJESHWARI HIGH SCHOOL MANCHEKERI YELLAPURA TALUK - 581 359 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 9. -
District Disaster Management Plan- Udupi
DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN- UDUPI UDUPI DISTRICT 2015-16 -1- -2- Executive Summary The District Disaster Management Plan is a key part of an emergency management. It will play a significant role to address the unexpected disasters that occur in the district effectively. The information available in DDMP is valuable in terms of its use during disaster. Based on the history of various disasters that occur in the district, the plan has been so designed as an action plan rather than a resource book. Utmost attention has been paid to make it handy, precise rather than bulky one. This plan has been prepared which is based on the guidelines from the National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM). While preparing this plan, most of the issues, relevant to crisis management, have been carefully dealt with. During the time of disaster there will be a delay before outside help arrives. At first, self-help is essential and depends on a prepared community which is alert and informed. Efforts have been made to collect and develop this plan to make it more applicable and effective to handle any type of disaster. The DDMP developed touch upon some significant issues like Incident Command System (ICS), In fact, the response mechanism, an important part of the plan is designed with the ICS. It is obvious that the ICS, a good model of crisis management has been included in the response part for the first time. It has been the most significant tool for the response manager to deal with the crisis within the limited period and to make optimum use of the available resources. -
29/01/2020 Government of Karnataka Page:319
29/01/2020 GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA PAGE:319 DEPARTMENT OF PRE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION LIST OF PU COLLEGES IN UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT AS ON 29/01/2020 ******************************************************************************** SLNO COLCD NAME AND ADDRESS YEAR OF OPEN & COLL TYPE OPENING & AIDED GO NOS. WITH DATE ******************************************************************************** 4294 QQ001 DIVEKAR COMMERC&SC PU COL 70-71 BIFUR PU COL KARWAR ED 36 UAC 70 DT 01-06-1970 NK DT 581301 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4295 QQ002 SHIVAJI PU COLLEGE 70-71 BIFUR PU COL BAAD NANDANGAD KARWAR TQ ED 31 UAC 70 DT 25-02-1971 NK DT 581304 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4296 QQ003 SHIVAJI COMP PU COLLEGE AIDED PU COL CHITTAKULA SADASHIVGAD AFL-CR-190/72-73 A1 25/05/1972 KARWAR TQ 581352 ED 38/TPU 72 DT 08/07/1972 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4297 QQ004 MAHASATEE PU COLLEGE 71-72 AIDED PU COL ULGA KARWAR TQ AFL CR 147 71-72 DT 02-06-1972 NK DT 581328 ED 38/TPU 72 DT 08/07/1972 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4298 QQ006 AV BALIGA PU COL OF A&S 49-50 BIFUR PU COL KUMTA NK DT 581343 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4299 QQ007 AV BALIGA COMMERCE PU COL 45-46 BIFUR PU COL KUMTA ED 141 UPC 76 DT 29-10-1977 NK DT 581343 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4300 -
Public Interest Litigation
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2019(GM-RES)PIL Between 1. Suresh Heblikar, Aged 69, son of Sri Balakrishna ,403, 18th Cross, 3rd Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru 560011 2. Joseph Hoover, Aged 58 years, son of James Hoover S/o #116, God’s Gift, 2nd Cross, 4th Main, Giridhama Layout, Rajarajeswari Nagar, Petitioners Bengaluru 560098 3. J Manjunath , Aged 60 years ,son of. B.V.JanakiramNaidu, 566, 21st Main, 36th Cross, 4 T Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru 560041 And 1. Union of India by its Deputy Inspector General Of Forest(WL) Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change,6th Floor, VayuWing,IndiraParyavaranBhavan, Jor Bag Road,Aliganj NEW DELHI-110 003 Respondents 2. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests , AranyaBhavan, Bengaluru-560 003, 3 National Highways Authority of India By its Assistant Commissioner, Belagavi And CALA,NH4-A, BELAGAVI- MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Petitioners in the above matter seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to file the Petition as Public Interest Litigation. The Petitioners have no personal or vested interest in the matter. 1. Petitioner No.1, Mr. Suresh Heblikar, aged 69 Years, belongs to Dharwad, a place known for arts, culture, poets and writers. He has nearly twenty years of experience in Films and Environment. He is also a powerful environmental voice in regional T.V channels representing environmental issues. He is a recipient of several awards like the Rajiv Gandhi Environment Award, Citizen Extraordinaire Award, United Nations – OSIRIS F.A.O Award to name a few from Govt of Karnataka, Rotary International and 19th Agro film festival 2002, Nitra, Slovakia. -
For Ch .No. 1 Villase Under Mavallihobli in Bhatkaltaluk Of
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA PUBLIC WORKS,PORTS& INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT (PORTS & INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT) Office of the Assistant Executive Engineer, Port Sub Division,Honnavar-581 334(U.K.Dist) TELEPHONE-08387-220865 E-mail Address: [email protected] Ju for ch Forest .No. 1 Villase under MavalliHobli in BhatkalTaluk of U. K. district The proposed port at Honnavar on the Kasarkod Tonka side is situated on the left bank of river Sharavati near the confluence/estuary of rivers Sharavatiand Badagani and Arabian sea.The road connectivity to this proposed port is very crucial and plays a vital role in transporting the cargoes to neighboring hinterlands. The Government of Karnataka has accorded approval to develop the infrastructure in Honnavar port and taking up the Port OPerations etc. As per the DPR approved by the Government of Karnataka, it is proposed to construct two rubble mound breakwaters at the existing gut along with river bank and coastal protection works, RCC piled quay, allied buildings, CC pavement and concrete road. ln this connection tt//s HPPL has taken up the preliminary survey work for the identification of stone and/or metal quarries in and around Honnavar port. This matter of identification of source for procuring stone/metal has been discussed with the officers of the Revenue Department/Forest Department and liflines & Geology. However, the officers have informed that nolegal quarry is in existence in Uttar Kannada District in the i*idv'6.hue,, patta and/or forbst land. The forest officers have informed that nearly 82% of "*la '-''l'' -!lt ir[10 ih Uttar. -
Ecological Status of Kali River Flood Plain
Annexure 6 Ecological Status of Kali River Flood Plain Sahyadri Conservation Series: 8 ENVIS Technical Report: 29, October 2008 Environmental Information System [ENVIS] Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560012, INDIA Web: http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/hpg/envis http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/ http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity Email: [email protected], [email protected] 102 Ecological Status of Kali River Flood Plain Sr. No. Title Page No. 1 Summary 3 2 Introduction 6 3 Study area 15 4 Methods 21 5 Result and Discussion 23 6 Conclusion 49 7 Acknowledgment 49 8 References 50 Tables Sr.No Name Pg No. 1 List of organisms found in Western Ghats with their endemism percentage 8 2 Acts and policies in India for protecting environment and wildlife 11 3 Land use details in the drainage basin of River Kali 16 4 Shrubs of Kali flood plain 24 5 Herbs of Kali flood plain 24 6 Trees of Kali flood plain 26 7 Climbers of Kali flood plain 28 8 Ferns of Kali flood plain 28 9 Rare and Threatened plants of Kali flood plain 28 10 The water quality values for each month during the study period in Naithihole 33 11 The water quality values for each month during the study period in Sakthihalla 34 12 Amphibian species list recorded from Kali River Catchment 36 13 Birds of Kali River Flood Plains 38 14 Water birds of the study area 40 Figures Sr.No Title Sr. No. Page No. 1 Study area – The flood plains of Kali River 17 2 Drainage network in Kali River basin 18 3 Mean Annual Rainfall in Kali River Basin 18 4 Land -
Development of Sea Port at Tadadi, Karnataka
DEVELOPMENT OF SEA PORT AT TADADI, KARNATAKA Karnataka, India - A Profile Karnataka, a State in the south of India, has been a pioneer state in industry with a distinction of a strong and vibrant industrial base. Karnataka is targeting an industrial growth rate of 12% per annum, with an increased emphasis on the expansion and growth of infrastructure sectors through private sector participation. Since ports are the trade gateways for a state, their ability to meet the increasing demands of a rapidly growing economy is crucial for addressing the rising import and export traffic. Currently there is one major port and two non-major ports that are operational in Karnataka. The major port at Mangalore, namely, New Mangalore Port Trust, currently caters to the cargo requirements of the southern districts of the state. Need for a Port on the West Coast Belekeri Tadadi The northern districts of the state, especially the Bellary–Hospet region produce large quantities of iron ore. The export potential of iron ore from this region is estimated at 30 million tones in 2010. Part of this iron ore is exported through the two non-major ports namely Karwar and Belekeri. However, bigger vessels cannot operate at these ports as the draft available is less. Further the capacity at these ports is also not adequate to cater to the iron ore export demand of this region. Thus, a port developed in the northern coastline of the state would cater to the districts of North Karnataka especially the iron-ore belt in Bellary - Hospet, thereby significantly improving the industrial advantage of the region. -
Appraisal of Forest Ecosystems Goods and Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation
Journal of Biodiversity ISSN: 0976-6901 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rbio20 Appraisal of Forest Ecosystems Goods and Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation T. V. Ramachandra, Divya Soman, Ashwath D. Naik & M. D. Subash Chandran To cite this article: T. V. Ramachandra, Divya Soman, Ashwath D. Naik & M. D. Subash Chandran (2017) Appraisal of Forest Ecosystems Goods and Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Journal of Biodiversity, 8:1, 12-33 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09766901.2017.1346160 Published online: 21 Aug 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rbio20 Download by: [Indian Institute of Science], [T. V. Ramachandra] Date: 26 September 2017, At: 07:01 J Biodiversity, 8(1): 12-33 (2017) DOI: 10.1080/09766901.2017.1346160 Appraisal of Forest Ecosystems Goods and Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation T. V. Ramachandra1,2,3, Divya Soman, Ashwath D. Naik1 and M. D. Subash Chandran1 1Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences (CES) 2Centre for Sustainable Technologies (ASTRA) 3Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP) Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, Karnataka, India Telephone: 91-80-23600985, 22932506, 22933099, Fax: 91-80-23601428, 23600085, 23600683[CES-TVR], E-mail: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> KEYWORDS Economic Valuation. Provisioning Services. Regulating Services. Tropical Forests ABSTRACT Valuation of ecosystem goods and services is essential to formulate sustainable development policies oriented towards the protection or restoration of ecosystems. -
Karwar, Close to the National Highway 17 (NH-17)
E421 VOL. 9 Wilsol In association with Public Disclosure Authorized IJiE IIIE Phase II - Environment Assessment Report for the Segment of Corridor 13A which passes through Dandeli Wildlife and Anshi National Park Public Disclosure Authorized Project Co-ordinating Consultancy Services (PCC) For the Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project IBRD Loan/Credit No. LN-4114 Belga Wi~~~~~dar Public Disclosure Authorized Karwa.r Mangalor, -g)alore Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared for Gov, of Karnataka Pubi c Works Dept. (PIU,KSHIP) Jqnuary 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Karnataka State Highways Environnmental Assessment Reportfor the Segmenit of Improvement Project Corridorl3A which passes tlroughi Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary and Anshi National Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction Corridor 13A, also known as State Highway 95 (SH 95), commences at Ramanagar junction on NH-4A near Londa in Belgaum District, enters Uttarakannada District and ends at Sadashivgadh, near Karwar, close to the National Highway 17 (NH-17). The total length of this Corridor is 121 Km and it offers c onnectivity to Belgaum, Karwar and Goa. This corridor passes through the Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary and Anshi National Park. Corridor 13A has been selected for rehabilitation under the Kamataka State Highways Improvement Project (KSHIP). 2. Project Road A 28 km section of Corridor 13A i.e from chainage 55.57 Km to 83.41 Km, passes through the Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary and the Anshi National Park. The corridor traverses buffer and core zones w ith undulating and hilly terrain t hroughout its e ntire length. T he width o f t he e xisting carriageway varies from 3.75m to 5.5m.