Early Impact History and Dynamical Origin of Differentiated Meteorites and Asteroids

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early Impact History and Dynamical Origin of Differentiated Meteorites and Asteroids Scott E. R. D., Keil K., Goldstein J. I., Asphaug E., Bottke W. F., and Moskovitz N. A. (2015) Early impact history and dynamical origin of differentiated meteorites and asteroids. In Asteroids IV (P. Michel et al., eds.), pp. 573–595. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, DOI: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816532131-ch030. Early Impact History and Dynamical Origin of Differentiated Meteorites and Asteroids Edward R. D. Scott and Klaus Keil University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Joseph I. Goldstein University of Massachusetts (now deceased) Erik Asphaug Arizona State University William F. Bottke Southwest Research Institute Nicholas A. Moskovitz Lowell Observatory Differentiated asteroids and igneous meteorites present numerous challenges to our un- derstanding of the impact and dynamical evolution of asteroids and meteorite parent bodies. Igneous meteorites, including irons, achondrites, and stony-iron meteorites, testify to the prior existence of ~100 differentiated bodies. Destruction of these bodies by hypervelocity impact over 4 G.y. would have required numerous giant impacts, although this is inconsistent with the preservation of Vesta’s basaltic crust and the lack of differentiated asteroid families. We review recent advances in elucidating the early chronology of meteorites, spectroscopic observations of likely differentiated asteroids, petrological studies of differentiated meteorites, impact disruption of differentiated planetesimals during accretion, and dynamical scenarios for capturing material into the asteroid belt. Together, these advances suggest a new paradigm in which planetesimals accreted rapidly in the inner solar system and were melted by 26Al less than 2 m.y. after the formation of calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs). While molten they were disrupted by grazing hit-and-run impacts during the accretion of planetesimals. Later, when still hot, the survivors were disrupted by hypervelocity impacts. Impact debris from the differentiated bodies was transferred from the newly formed terrestrial planet region to stable orbits in the asteroid belt. This evolutionary history leaves many questions unanswered but suggests new paths for future exploration of the asteroid belt and petrological and isotopic studies of meteorites. 1. INTRODUCTION they were the ultimate source of the differentiated meteorites, one might expect collisions to have created enormous numbers Laboratory studies of igneously formed meteorites suggest of V-type asteroids that were not derived from Vesta, as well that numerous meteorite parent bodies were melted to form as ample numbers of mantle and core fragments compared metallic cores and silicate mantles. Studies by the Dawn to the rest of the main-belt population. This is not observed. spacecraft confirm that (4) Vesta melted in this way (McSween Instead, only limited examples of asteroids composed pre- et al., 2013; see the chapter by Russell et al. in this volume). dominantly of core metallic Fe-Ni (possibly some M-type In principle, one would think the origin of iron and stony- asteroids) or mantle olivine (some A-type asteroids) have been iron meteorites and achondrites would be straightforward to identified. Very few of these bodies are members of asteroid investigate, but this is not the case. If disrupted Vesta-like families, with those in families having orbits and sizes most differentiated bodies were once common in the main belt and consistent with being interlopers. 573 574 Asteroids IV Differentiated asteroids and meteorites provide many 2. MELTING AND SOLIDIFICATION other challenges to our understanding of the formation and OF ASTEROIDS evolution of the asteroid belt. How could core samples have been extracted from numerous large differentiated 2.1. When Were Meteoritic Bodies Melted bodies when Vesta’s basaltic crust was preserved (Davis and Solidified? et al., 1985)? Where are the meteorites from the olivine- rich mantles of the parent bodies of the 12 groups of iron Advances in the use of short-lived and long-lived radio- meteorites and the ~50–70 parent bodies of the ungrouped nuclides for dating meteorites since Asteroids III have revo- irons, the two groups of pallasites, and the type 4–6 un- lutionized our understanding of the timescales for early solar grouped pallasites — “the great dunite shortage” (Bell et system processes (Davis and McKeegan, 2014). The U-Pb al., 1989)? We also lack mantle and core samples from the system provides two isotopic clocks with different half-lives: parent asteroids of the angrites and the ungrouped eucrites 238U decays to 206Pb with a half-life of 4469 m.y., and 235U like Northwest Africa (NWA) 011 and Ibitira (Krot et al., decays to 207Pb with a half-life of 704 m.y. Measurements 2014). Where is the missing Psyche family of silicate-rich of 207Pb/204Pb and 206Pb/204Pb can provide ages with preci- asteroids (Davis et al., 1999)? Why are meteorites derived sions of 0.1–1 m.y. in favorable cases. After allowance for from far more differentiated parent bodies than chondritic small variations in the 238U/235U ratio (Wadhwa, 2014), the parent bodies even though the asteroid belt is dominated by Pb-Pb technique gives ages of 4567.2 to 4568.2 Ma for CAIs C and S complex chondritic asteroids (Bottke et al., 2006)? from CV3 chondrites, which provide our best estimate of We reassess ideas about the dynamical origin and early the formation age (t0) of the first solid materials in the solar impact histories of differentiated asteroids and meteorites system. Figure 1, which shows ages of early solar system in the light of major advances since Asteroids III. These materials, was constructed using a mean value of 4567.5 Ma include advances in our understanding of the chronology of for t0. [The small difference between this value and that the early solar system, the distribution of short-lived isotopes preferred by Davis and McKeegan (2014) of 4567.3 ± including 26Al, the identification of pristine chondrites and 0.2 Ma from Connelly et al. (2012) is of no consequence differentiated meteorites that escaped prolonged alteration in this discussion.] or metamorphism, the thermal histories of differentiated Short-lived chronometers like 26Al, which decays to meteorites, the nature of S asteroids, impact modeling during 26Mg with a half-life of 0.71 m.y., and 182Hf, which decays accretion, and dynamical studies of planetesimal accretion. to 182W with a half-life of 8.90 m.y., provide relative ages. Together, these advances suggest a new paradigm (Bottke For example, CAIs have inferred initial ratios of 26Al/27Al et al., 2006; Goldstein et al., 2009) in which planetesimals that are roughly 8 (= 23)× higher than most chondrules, accreted rapidly in the inner solar system and were rapidly and so formed about 2 (3 × 0.71) m.y. before chondrules. melted by 26Al less than 2 m.y. after CAI formation. While Manganese-53, which decays to 53Cr with a half life of they were still molten or semimolten, planetesimals were 3.7 m.y., also provides valuable relative ages but cannot disrupted — first by grazing impacts during the accretion that be used to date CAIs because Mn is depleted in CAIs and harvested the objects making slow, direct hits (Asphaug et al., Cr shows mass-independent isotopic anomalies. The short- 2006), and later by hypervelocity impacts when larger bodies lived and long-lived chronometers are cross-calibrated using excited their orbits. Impact debris from the differentiated bod- angrites — achondrites that crystallized 4–11 m.y. after CAIs ies was tossed into the asteroid belt. Most iron meteorites did and escaped extensive metamorphism and shock heating not cool slowly inside insulating silicate mantles, like Vesta’s (Brennecka and Wadhwa, 2012; Kleine et al., 2012). The core, but rapidly with little or no silicate insulation less than oldest, fine-grained angrites such as D’Orbigny are espe- 5 m.y. after CAI formation. In this scenario, Vesta — the cially important anchors for the short-lived chronometers as dominant single source of differentiated meteorites, viz., they crystallized and cooled very rapidly (in days). the howardites, eucrites, and diogenites (HEDs) — is not a Radioactive isotopic systems record the time at which dif- typical differentiated asteroid. fusion of the parent and daughter isotopes between minerals In this chapter, we first describe the isotopic evidence effectively ceased. Thus ages of slowly cooled rocks depend that has been used to establish a new chronology for melt- on cooling rates (Ganguly and Tirone, 2001). Many igne- ing and solidification of igneous meteorites and to identify ous and metamorphosed meteorites cooled slowly at around the heat source. Then we review the types, properties, and 10–103°C m.y.–1, so that radiometric ages based on isotopic abundances of differentiated asteroids and asteroid families. systems in various minerals with closure temperatures that Next, we describe the various types of igneous meteorites, range from ~300° to 1100°C could differ by ~50 m.y. or focusing on evidence that their parent bodies were disrupted more for slowly cooled meteorites, but only ~1 m.y. for by impacts while they were still partly or wholly molten. quickly cooled meteorites. For example, Hf-W closure Finally, we discuss numerical simulations of grazing impacts temperatures for pyroxene are ~750°–900°C, depending on between differentiated planetesimals during accretion (“hit- grain size and cooling rate (Kleine et al., 2008). However, and-run” impacts), and dynamical studies that suggest how zircons may crystallize from melts above their Hf-W clo- planetesimals could have been scattered into the asteroid sure temperatures and so record the time of crystallization. belt from 1 to 2 AU. Closure temperatures for Pb-Pb ages of phosphates in or- Scott et al.: Early Impact History and Dynamical Origin 575 Age (Ma) 4568 4566 4564 4562 4560 4558 4556 Differentiated Meteorites IIAB IIIAB Phosphate Iron Meteorites IVB IVA FeS Accretion Crystallization Core formation Ureilites Quenched angrites Ungrouped eucrite Shallowater aubrite Chondrites LL CO Chondrule Formation CV CB Accretion Alteration 102 m.y.
Recommended publications
  • Fe,Mg)S, the IRON-DOMINANT ANALOGUE of NININGERITE
    1687 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 40, pp. 1687-1692 (2002) THE NEW MINERAL SPECIES KEILITE, (Fe,Mg)S, THE IRON-DOMINANT ANALOGUE OF NININGERITE MASAAKI SHIMIZU§ Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, Toyama University, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama 930-8555, Japan § HIDETO YOSHIDA Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan § JOSEPH A. MANDARINO 94 Moore Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1V3, and Earth Sciences Division, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queens’s Park, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C6, Canada ABSTRACT Keilite, (Fe,Mg)S, is a new mineral species that occurs in several meteorites. The original description of niningerite by Keil & Snetsinger (1967) gave chemical analytical data for “niningerite” in six enstatite chondrites. In three of those six meteorites, namely Abee and Adhi-Kot type EH4 and Saint-Sauveur type EH5, the atomic ratio Fe:Mg has Fe > Mg. Thus this mineral actually represents the iron-dominant analogue of niningerite. By analogy with synthetic MgS and niningerite, keilite is cubic, with space group Fm3m, a 5.20 Å, V 140.6 Å3, Z = 4. Keilite and niningerite occur as grains up to several hundred ␮m across. Because of the small grain-size, most of the usual physical properties could not be determined. Keilite is metallic and opaque; in reflected light, it is isotropic and gray. Point-count analyses of samples of the three meteorites by Keil (1968) gave the following amounts of keilite (in vol.%): Abee 11.2, Adhi-Kot 0.95 and Saint-Sauveur 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • (704) Interamnia from Its Occultations and Lightcurves
    International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2014, 4, 91-118 Published Online March 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijaa http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2014.41010 A 3-D Shape Model of (704) Interamnia from Its Occultations and Lightcurves Isao Satō1*, Marc Buie2, Paul D. Maley3, Hiromi Hamanowa4, Akira Tsuchikawa5, David W. Dunham6 1Astronomical Society of Japan, Yamagata, Japan 2Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, USA 3International Occultation Timing Association, Houston, USA 4Hamanowa Astronomical Observatory, Fukushima, Japan 5Yanagida Astronomical Observatory, Ishikawa, Japan 6International Occultation Timing Association, Greenbelt, USA Email: *[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 9 November 2013; revised 9 December 2013; accepted 17 December 2013 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract A 3-D shape model of the sixth largest of the main belt asteroids, (704) Interamnia, is presented. The model is reproduced from its two stellar occultation observations and six lightcurves between 1969 and 2011. The first stellar occultation was the occultation of TYC 234500183 on 1996 De- cember 17 observed from 13 sites in the USA. An elliptical cross section of (344.6 ± 9.6 km) × (306.2 ± 9.1 km), for position angle P = 73.4 ± 12.5˚ was fitted. The lightcurve around the occulta- tion shows that the peak-to-peak amplitude was 0.04 mag. and the occultation phase was just be- fore the minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • M Iei1canjlusellm PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y
    jovitatesM iei1canJlusellm PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 2173 APRIL I4, I964 The Chainpur Meteorite BY KLAUS KEIL,1 BRIAN MASON,2 H. B. WIIK,3 AND KURT FREDRIKSSON4 INTRODUCTION This remarkable meteorite fell on May 9, 1907, at 1.30 P.M. as a shower of stones at and near the village of Chainpur (latitude 210 51' N., longi- tude 83° 29' E.) on the Ganges Plain. Some 8 kilograms were recovered. The circumstances of the fall and the recovery of the stones, and a brief description of the material, were given by Cotter (1912). One of us (Mason), when examining the Nininger Meteorite Collection in Arizona State University in January, 1962, noticed the unusual ap- pearance of a fragment of this meteorite, particularly the large chondrules and the friable texture, and obtained a sample for further investigation. Shortly thereafter, Keil was studying the Nininger Meteorite Collection, also remarked on this meteorite, and began independently to investigate it. In the meantime, Mason had sent a sample to Wiik for analysis. Under these circumstances, it seems desirable to report all these investi- gations in a single paper. 1 Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California. 2 Chairman, Department of Mineralogy, the American Museum of Natural History. 3Research Associate, Department of Mineralogy, the American Museum of Natural History. 4Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla. 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2173 FIG. 1. Photomicrograph of a thin section of the Chainpur meteorite, showing chondrules of olivine and pyroxene in a black matrix.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Institute of Meteoritics G
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository UNM History Essays UNM History 1988 History of the Institute of Meteoritics G. Jeffrey Taylor Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/unm_hx_essays Recommended Citation Taylor, G. Jeffrey. "History of the Institute of Meteoritics." (1988). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/unm_hx_essays/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the UNM History at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNM History Essays by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. History of the Institute of Meteoritics G. Jeffrey Taylor The story of the Institute of Meteoritics centers on the lives of two dynamic men. One of them, Lincoln LaPaz, founded the Institute. He grew up in Kansas, where he saw Halley’s Comet at age 13 and where he gazed up at the night sky from the top of his house, studying meteors as they blazed through the atmosphere. While a student at Fairmount College in Wichita, LaPaz rode his horse, Belle, to class, letting her graze in a neighboring field while he studied mathematics. The other key figure in the Institute’s history is Klaus Keil, Director since 1968. He grew up in what became East Germany, and escaped the stifling, totalitarian life behind the iron curtain when in his young twenties, carrying meteorite specimens with him. Though having vastly different roots, LaPaz and Keil share the same fascination with stones that fall from the sky. The Institute’s story can be told in three parts: LaPaz’s era, a period of transition, and Keil’s era.
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 Oct 8-10 Council Minutes
    Minutes of the Council Meeting of the Meteoritical Society October 8, 1968 Hoffman Geological Laboratory Harvard University Cambridge The meeting was convened at 2:15 p.m. with President Carleton B. Moore presiding. In attendance were Vice Presidents Barandon Barringer, Robert S. Dietz and John A. O'Keefe, Secretary Roy S. Clarke, Jr., Treasurer Ursula B. Marvin, Editor Dorrit Hoffleit, Past President Peter M. Millman, and Councilors Richard Barringer, Kurt Fredriksson, Gerald S. Hawkins, Klaus Keil, Brian H. Mason and John A. Wood. Robin Brett, John T. Wasson and Fred L. Whipple attended the meeting as visitors. Minutes The minutes of the Council meeting held at the Holiday Inn, Mountain View California, on October 24, 1967, were approved as submitted. Program, 31st Annual Meeting Ursula Marvin presented the program for the Annual Meeting and discussed arrangements and last minute changes. The Council unanimously approved the program as presented and thanked Mrs. Marvin and her coworkers for their efforts on behalf of the Society. Secretary's Report The report of the Secretary was submitted to the Council in writing and was accepted as submitted (copy attached). There was brief discussion of the nomenclature problem of Barringer Meteor Crater. It was pointed out that in the final analysis usage determines the name that becomes accepted. It was suggested that Society members use the name Barringer Meteor Crater in speaking and writing and that we encourage others to do the same. No other action was suggested at this time. The problem of dues for foreign members was discussed, and several individuals suggested that funds are available to help in cases of demonstrated need.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies Final Report
    PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies Final Report Committee to Review Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies Space Studies Board Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study is based on work supported by the Contract NNH06CE15B between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Space Studies Board National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Calcium Pyroxene As an Indicator of Igneous Differentiation in Asteroids and Meteorites
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 8, 1343–1357 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org High-calcium pyroxene as an indicator of igneous differentiation in asteroids and meteorites Jessica M. SUNSHINE,1* Schelte J. BUS,2 Timothy J. MCCOY,3 Thomas H. BURBINE,4 Catherine M. CORRIGAN,3 and Richard P. BINZEL5 1Advanced Technology Applications Division, Science Applications International Corporation, Chantilly, Virginia 20151, USA 2University of Hawaii, Institute for Astronomy, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, USA 3Department of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560–0119, USA 4Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA 5Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachussets 02139, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 9 March 2004; revision accepted 21 April 2004) Abstract–Our analyses of high quality spectra of several S-type asteroids (17 Thetis, 847 Agnia, 808 Merxia, and members of the Agnia and Merxia families) reveal that they include both low- and high- calcium pyroxene with minor amounts of olivine (<20%). In addition, we find that these asteroids have ratios of high-calcium pyroxene to total pyroxene of >~0.4. High-calcium pyroxene is a spectrally detectable and petrologically important indicator of igneous history and may prove critical in future studies aimed at understanding the history of asteroidal bodies. The silicate mineralogy inferred for Thetis and the Merxia and Agnia family members requires that these asteroids experienced igneous differentiation, producing broadly basaltic surface lithologies. Together with 4 Vesta (and its smaller “Vestoid” family members) and the main-belt asteroid 1489 Magnya, these new asteroids provide strong evidence for igneous differentiation of at least five asteroid parent bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buritizal Meteorite
    Rogerio Nogueira Salaverry et al. GeosciencesGeociências The Buritizal meteorite: classification http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672016700081 of a new Brazilian chondrite Rogerio Nogueira Salaverry Abstract Mestre Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ On August 14, 1967, the reporter Saulo Gomes, working at TV Tupi, went to a Instituto de Geociências small city in the State of São Paulo called Buritizal to investigate reports of a mete- Departamento de Geologia orite fall and write a newspaper report. He actually recovered three fragments of the Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro - Brasil meteorite at a small farm. In 2014, he donated one of the fragments to the Museu [email protected] Nacional of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (MN/UFRJ). We named this meteorite Buritizal and studied its petrology, geochemistry, magnetic properties and Maria Elizabeth Zucolotto cathodoluminescence with the intent to determine the petrologic classification of the Professora Adjunta meteorite. In this manner, the Buritizal meteorite is classified as an ordinary chondrite Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ LL 3.2 breccia (as indicated by lithic fragments). The meteorite consists of ~ 2% of me- Museu Nacional – Departamento de tallic Fe,Ni and many well-defined chondrules with ~ 0.8 mm in average diameter. An Geologia e Paleontologia ultramafic ferromagnesian mineralogy is predominant in the meteorite, represented by Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro – Brasil olivine, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, Fe-Ni alloy, troilite and glass. The total iron [email protected] content was calculated as 20.88 wt%. Furthermore, the meteorite was classified as weathering grade W1 and shock stage S3.
    [Show full text]
  • (2000) Forging Asteroid-Meteorite Relationships Through Reflectance
    Forging Asteroid-Meteorite Relationships through Reflectance Spectroscopy by Thomas H. Burbine Jr. B.S. Physics Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1988 M.S. Geology and Planetary Science University of Pittsburgh, 1991 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EARTH, ATMOSPHERIC, AND PLANETARY SCIENCES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PLANETARY SCIENCES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2000 © 2000 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author: Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences December 30, 1999 Certified by: Richard P. Binzel Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Ronald G. Prinn MASSACHUSES INSTMUTE Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Department Head JA N 0 1 2000 ARCHIVES LIBRARIES I 3 Forging Asteroid-Meteorite Relationships through Reflectance Spectroscopy by Thomas H. Burbine Jr. Submitted to the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences on December 30, 1999 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Planetary Sciences ABSTRACT Near-infrared spectra (-0.90 to ~1.65 microns) were obtained for 196 main-belt and near-Earth asteroids to determine plausible meteorite parent bodies. These spectra, when coupled with previously obtained visible data, allow for a better determination of asteroid mineralogies. Over half of the observed objects have estimated diameters less than 20 k-m. Many important results were obtained concerning the compositional structure of the asteroid belt. A number of small objects near asteroid 4 Vesta were found to have near-infrared spectra similar to the eucrite and howardite meteorites, which are believed to be derived from Vesta.
    [Show full text]
  • Für Astronomie Nr
    für Astronomie Nr. 26 Zeitschrift der Vereinigung der Sternfreunde e.V. / VdS Einsteigerastronomie und Jugendarbeit Astrofotografie ISSN 1615 - 0880 www.vds-astro.de II/ 2008 JOGP!BTUSPTIPQDPNtXXXBTUSPTIPQDPN 5FMt'BY &JõFTUSt)BNCVSH "TUSPBSU "TUSPOPNJL)BMQIB$$% "UMBTEFS.FTTJFS0CKFLUF %JF BLUVFMMTUF 7FSTJPO &JOF 4POEFSFOUXJDLMVOH GàS EJF $$%"TUSP &JOFHFMVOHFOF.JTDIVOHBVT#FPCBDIUVOHT EFTCFLBOOUFO#JMECF OPNJF%BT'JMUFS XFMDIFTBVTTDIMJFMJDIGàSEFO IJMGFVOE#JMECBOE%BTHSP[àHJHF'PSNBUVOE BSCFJUVOHTQSPHSBN OÊDIUMJDIFO&JOTBU[LPO[JOÊDIUMJDIFO&JOTBU[LPO[J EJF BVGXÊOEJHF PQUJTDIF (FTUBMUVOH NBDIFO NFT HJCU FT KFU[U NJU QJFSU JTU WFSGàHU àCFS EJF-FLUàSF[VFJOFNFDIUFO(FOVTT JOUFSFTTBOUFO OFVFO FJOF5SBOTNJTTJPO &JOF EFSBSUJH VNGBOHSFJDIF VOE WPMMTUÊOEJHF 'VOLUJPOFO .PEFS WPO CJT [V %BSTUFMMVOH [V EFO OF %BUFJGPSNBUF XJF EJF NJU .FTTJFS.FTTJFS0CKFLUFO0CKFLUFO IBU FT CJTIFS JO %4-33"8 XFSEFO TDINBMCBOEJ EFVUTDIFS 4QSBDIF VOUFSTUàU[U #JMEFS HFSFO 'JMUFSO OPDI OJDIU HFHF LÚOOFOEVSDIBVUP OJDIU [V CFO %JF #FTDISFJ#FTDISFJ NBUJTDIF 4UFSOGFM FSSF J D I F O CVOH [V EFO EFSLFOOVOH EJSFLU JTU %JF )BMC 0CKFLUFO HMJFEFSO ÃCFSMBHFSU XFSEFO XBT EJF #JMEGFMESPUBUJPO XFSUTCSFJUF TJDI JO EJF WFSOBDIMÊTTJHCBSNBDIU"VDIEJF#FBSCFJUVOH JTU BVG EFO "CTDIOJUUF )JTUP)JTUP WPO 'BSCCJMEFSO XVSEF FSXFJUFSU #FTPOEFSFT %VOLFMTUSPN WPO HÊOHJHFO $$%,BNFSBT SJF "TUSPQIZTJL "VHFONFSL MJFHU BVG EFS &SLFOOVOH VOE BCHFTUJNNU%JFIPIF5SBOTNJTTJPOCFJ)BMQIB VOE ##FPCBDIFPCBDI #FIBOEMVOH WPO 1JYFMGFIMFSO EFS "VGOBINF LPNCJOJFSU NJU EFS #MPDLVOH CJT JOT *OGSBSPU UVOH (MFJDIHàMUJH PC EBT *OUFSFTTF
    [Show full text]
  • An Appreciation of Dieter Stˆffler
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40, Nr 9/10, 1277–1281 (2005) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org An appreciation of Dieter Stˆffler Klaus KEIL Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822, USA E-mail: [email protected] With this volume of Meteoritics & Planetary Science, we honor Dieter Stˆffler (Fig. 1) on the occasion of his (obligatory) retirement from university service, for his many outstanding contributions as a teacher, researcher, and servant of the profession. Dieter was born on May 23, 1939, in Schramberg, Kreis Rottweil, Germany. He began his studies of mineralogy and geology at the Eberhard Karls University in T¸bingen, Germany in 1958 and received his doctorate in natural sciences in 1963. Until 1970, he was assistant to Professor Wolf von Engelhardt at that university (Fig. 2) and, in 1970, earned his “Habilitation” (an advanced doctorate at German universities that is a prerequisite for teaching at the university level). He was docent at T¸bingen until 1974 and then moved to the Westf‰lische Wilhelms-University in M¸nster as Professor of Petrography and Mineral Deposits, a position he held until 1987. In that year, Dieter became Professor of Cosmic Mineralogy and Director of the newly founded Institute for Planetology at M¸nster, the only chair and institute of its kind in Germany. In 1993, Dieter moved on to Humboldt University in the then–re-united Berlin, where he served as Director of the Naturhistorisches Forschungsinstitut and the Museum f¸r Naturkunde until 1999 and, until 2004, as Professor of Mineralogy and Petrology and Director of the Institute of Mineralogy.
    [Show full text]