Dimensional Organization of Chromosome Territories In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dimensional Organization of Chromosome Territories In View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Three - Dimensional Organization of Chromosome Territories in provided by Erasmus University Digital Repository the Human Interphase Cell Nucleus Human 3D Genome Study Group Tobias A. Knoch, Christian Münkel and Jörg Langowski 1) 2) 3) Joachim Rauch, Harald Bornfleth and Christoph Cremer with Irina Solovei and Thomas Cremer 1) Division Biophysics of Macromolecules, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D - 69120 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany German Human 2) Instiute for Applied Physics, Albert Ueberle Str. 3-5, 3) Institute for Anthropology and Human Genetics, 69120 Heidelberg, FRG http://www.DKFZ-Heidelberg.de/Macromol/Welcome.html Richard Wagner Str. 10, 8033Munich, FRG Genome Project PURPOSE SIMULATIONS The eukaryotic cell is a prime example of a functioning nano With Monte Carlo and Brownian Dynamics methods Random Walk / Giant Loop model Multi-Loop-Subcompartment model machinery. The synthesis of proteins, maintenance of structure and we simulated various models (see sketch left) of human (RW/GL) (MLS) interphase chromosome 15 assuming a flexible polymer chain. To save computer power we start with duplication of the eukaryotic cell itself are all fine-tuned biochemical Sachs et al. (1995) Münkel et al. (1997) ~3,500 300nm=31kbp and later we relax with ~21,000 50nm=5,2 kbp long segments. For simulation of a single processes that depend on the precise structural arrangement of the chromosome it is placed in a potential well whose height R bands is related to the excluded volume interaction (EVI). The cellular components. The regulation of genes – their transcription G bands EVI keeps the chain from self crossing. Starting configurations have the approximate form and size of a and replication - has been shown to be connected closely to the loop size: 5Mbp metaphase chromosome (Fig. 1) from which the following decondensation into interphase resembles the natural three-dimensional organization of the genome in the cell nucleus. process. Despite the successful linear sequencing of the human genome its Fig. 1 three-dimensional structure is widely unknown. With the simulation of chromosomes and cell nuclei in comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization we show here an approach loop size: 126kbp backbone leading to the detailed determination of the three-dimensional (non DNA) organization of the human genome: attachment rosette size: 1-2Mbp Rosettes in the Multi-Loop-Subcompartment model points (according to interphase correspond to the size of chromosomal interphase band Best agreement between simulations and experiment is reached for ideogram bands) domains. For simulation of a whole interphase nucleus 46 a Multi-Loop-Subcompartment model, thus the human genome Linker consists of DNA methaphase chromosomes are placed randomly in a chromatin fiber, 30nm thick nucleus confined by an EVI. The simulations are made shows a higher degree of determinism than previously thought. (no separate backbone needed) on two IBM SP2 parallel computers with 80 and 512 nodes. Fig. 4 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Simulation of a human interphase cell Ray traced image of the Ray traced image of the Multi-Loop nucleus with all 46 chromosomes with Random-Walk/Giant-Loop model, loop Subcompartment model, loop size 1,200,000 polymer segments after 0.5s size 5Mbp, after ~80.000 Monte-Carlo 126kbp, linker size 126 kbp, after Brownian Dynamics simulation with 10s steps. and 1000 relaxing Brownian Dynamics ~50.000 Monte-Carlo and 1000 The MLS-model leads to the formation of steps. Large loops intermingle freely relaxing Brownian- Dynamics steps. distinct chromosome territories and thus forming no distinct features like in Here rosettes form subcompartments subcompartments. the MLS model. as separated organizational and dynamic entities. Typical textbook illustration of the human cell nucleus: 1) human cell nuclei differ from spherical shape, 2) the DNA is not a closed pipe, 3) nucleosomes are not regularly organized into chromatin, 4) chromatin does not float around randomly in the nucleus. V. Hennings (illustrator) in Molecular and Cellular Biology by Stephen L. Wolfe, 1993. EXPERIMENTS CONCLUSION Best agreement between simulations and experiments is reached for a Measurement of 3D-Distances between Genomic Markers Multi-Loop-Subcompartment model with a loop size of roughly126kbp and a linker length of 1,200nm. Supposed that defined loop bases exist it might be Prader-Willi Region (paternal chromosome) YAC 48 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in connection with arm 1Mbp possible to determine the mean positioning of genes relative to each other. Angelmann Region (maternal chromosome) YAC 60 confocal light microscopy is used for the specific marking of centromer 1.5 small chromosomal DNA regions. Despite the low spatial resolution 15q11-13 PLW/A-Region, FISH, RW/GL-model: Fig. 7 of FISH, it is possible to interprete the results (f. e. the 3D distance our data. loop size: 5 Mbp clones and their genomic size Lymphocytes 11q13 FISH, K. Monier, Institut 3 Mbp Fibroblasts 11q13 } Albert Bonniot, Grenoble. between genetic markers as a function of their genomic distance) 1.0 Mbp λ 48.1 λ 48.17 λ λ 48.14 48.7 with our simulations. Yokota et. al., 1995. 0,5 Mbp 0,12 Mbp p 17,3 17,8 13.0 11.0 q Chromosome 15 and the Prader-Labhard-Willi/Angelmann 1 arm 69.2 156,6 17,0 Syndrom region was chosen, because the genomic distance between markers is well known (see sketch left) and because the 225.8 [kbp] PLW/A-syndrom is a candidate for structure mutation (in contrast 173.6 to the common base pair mutation). 0.5 242.8 Collaboration with B. Horsthemke, Institute for Human MLS-model (loop size 126 kbp): linker length: 251kbp genomic distances between probe pairs mean spatial distance [m] Genetics, Essen, FRG. 188kbp 126kbp 62kbp Methods: Human fibroblast cells grown on coverslips to confluent Distance Distribution Fig. 5 0 layers and being assumed to rest now in the same cell cycle phase 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 .08 # of distances: 305 are fixed in isotonic environment with paraformaldehyde. genomic distance between genomic markers [Mbp] Mean: (77623)nm For Hybridization we use digoxigenin labeled DNA probes. The 20 For calculating more general properties of chromosomes the fractal dimension probes are detected with fluorescent dyes. .05 15 of the chromatin fiber was determined from the simulations. The fractal analysis resulted in multifractal behaviour (data not shown here) in good 10 Confocal image series were taken with a Leica TCS NT confocal agreement with predictions drawn from porous network research (Avnir, 1989; smooth fit microscope with an axial displacement of z = 200nm. The images Frequency .03 Mandelbrot, private communications). 5 normal fit are median and background filtered. After manual threshold 5 RW/GL: Excluded Volume 0.1kT Fig. 8 [%] [N] determination from an extended focus view (Fig. 6) for spot finding LoopSize 5Mbp, LinkerLength 3600nm, 20 Loops LoopSize 126kbp, LinkerLength 600nm, 561 Loops we proceed with image reconstruction specially adjusted to the MLS: LoopSize 126kbp, Excluded Volume 0.1kT 4 LinkerLength 600nm microscope. Finally the 3D-spatial distances are determined LinkerLength 1200nm LinkerLength 1800nm 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 between the centers of mass of the spots (Fig. 5). The Euclidean Cut Off LinkerLength 2400nm D = 1.1 MLS: LoopSize 126kbp, Excluded Volume 1.0kT Spatial Distance [nm] experimental distance distributions are then compared to the D = 2.43 3 computed ones. We use a workstation cluster of 10 Silicon D = 1.89 Graphics Indigo and Indigo II for computation. D = 2.48 D = 2.88 2 D = 2.93 D = 2.01 The fibroblast nuclei are found to have their in vivo size (~20m * D = 2.98 10m * 6m) so that we conclude that at least on the micrometer 1 length scale we preserved the nuclear structure. With two colour D = 2.03 FISH it is possible to detect 3D-distances below the optical Log(Curve Length in Number of Measures) SegmentLength 300nm resolution. 0 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Log (Measure Length [nm]) Fig. 6 Chromosomes form distinct territories in interphase and genomic The simulation of a whole human cell nucleus with all 46 human markers lay clearly separable within the territories. chromosomes in connection with the simulation of single chromosomes Left: Territory painting by FISH of chromosome 15; by chance the resulted in the formation of distinct chromosome territories as predicted. In two territories neighbour each other. contrast to the RW/GL-model the MLS-model leads to low overlap between Right: Genomic markers YAC48 and YAC60, genomic separation chromosome territories as well as chromosome arms, in agreement with overlap 1Mbp. analysis of confocal image series (data not shown here). Three-Dimensional Organization of Chromosome Territories in the Human Interphase Cell Nucleus Knoch, T. A., Münkel, C. & Langowski, J. Functional Organization of the Cell Nucleus - EMBO Workshop, Prague, Czech Republic, 9th - 12th August 1999. Abstract To study the three-dimensional organization of chromosome territories and the human interphase cell nucleus we developed models which could be compared to experiments. Despite the successful linear sequencing of the human genome its 3D-organization is widely unknown. Using Monte Carlo and Brownian dynamics simulations we managed to model the chromatin fibre as a wormlike-chain polymer. A typical chromosome consists of 20.000 and a nucleus with all 46 chromosomes of 1.200.000 polymer chain segments. The parallel simulations are performed on a SP2512 and a Cray T3E. With fluorescent in situ hybridization and confocal microscopy we determined genomic marker distributions and chromosome arm overlap. Best agreement between simulations and experiments is reached for a Multi-Loop-Subcompartment model (126 kbp loops connected to rosettes connected by a 126 kbp chromatin linker).
Recommended publications
  • 82755929.Pdf
    FEBS Letters 589 (2015) 2931–2943 journal homepage: www.FEBSLetters.org Review The 4D nucleome: Evidence for a dynamic nuclear landscape based on co-aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments ⇑ Thomas Cremer a, , Marion Cremer a, Barbara Hübner a,1, Hilmar Strickfaden b, Daniel Smeets a, ⇑ ⇑ Jens Popken a, Michael Sterr a,2, Yolanda Markaki a, Karsten Rippe c, , Christoph Cremer d, a Biocenter, Department Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Martinsried, Germany b University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute Dept. of Oncology, Edmonton, AB, Canada c German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) & BioQuant Center, Research Group Genome Organization & Function, Heidelberg, Germany d Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz and Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), University of Heidelberg, Germany article info abstract Article history: Recent methodological advancements in microscopy and DNA sequencing-based methods provide Received 1 April 2015 unprecedented new insights into the spatio-temporal relationships between chromatin and nuclear Revised 19 May 2015 machineries. We discuss a model of the underlying functional nuclear organization derived mostly Accepted 20 May 2015 from electron and super-resolved fluorescence microscopy studies. It is based on two spatially Available online 28 May 2015 co-aligned, active and inactive nuclear compartments (ANC and INC). The INC comprises the com- Edited by Wilhelm Just pact, transcriptionally inactive core of chromatin domain clusters (CDCs). The ANC is formed by the transcriptionally active periphery of CDCs, called the perichromatin region (PR), and the inter- chromatin compartment (IC). The IC is connected to nuclear pores and serves nuclear import and Keywords: 4D nucleome export functions. The ANC is the major site of RNA synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Territories
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Chromosome Territories Thomas Cremer1,2 and Marion Cremer1 1Biozentrum, Department of Biology II (Chair of Anthropology and Human Genetics), Ludwig-Maximilians- University, Grosshadernerstrasse 2, 82152 Martinsried, Germany 2Munich Center for Integrated Protein Sciences (CIPSM), 81377 Munich, Germany Correspondence: [email protected] Chromosome territories (CTs) constitute a major feature of nuclear architecture. In a brief statement, the possible contribution of nuclear architecture studies to the field of epigenom- ics is considered, followed bya historical account of the CT concept and the final compelling experimental evidence of a territorial organization of chromosomes in all eukaryotes studied to date. Present knowledge of nonrandom CT arrangements, of the internal CT archi- tecture, and of structural interactions with other CTs is provided as well as the dynamics of CT arrangements during cell cycle and postmitotic terminal differentiation. The article concludes with a discussion of open questions and new experimental strategies to answer them. mpressive progress has been achieved during for an integrated understanding of the structural Ithe last decade with regard to the functional and functional aspects of epigenetics with nu- implications of DNA methylation, histone mo- clear architecture during the differentiation of difications, and chromatin remodeling events toti- or pluripotent cells to functionally distinct for gene regulation (Fuks 2005; Kouzarides cell types. 2007; Maier et al. 2008; Jiang and Pugh 2009). The territorial organization of chromo- It has, however, also become obvious that somes in interphase (chromosome territories, decoding the chromatin language does not suf- CTs) constitutes a basic feature of nuclear archi- fice to fully understand the ways in which the tecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Territories, Nuclear Architecture and Gene Regulation in Mammalian Cells
    REVIEWS CHROMOSOME TERRITORIES, NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE AND GENE REGULATION IN MAMMALIAN CELLS T. Cremer* ‡ and C. Cremer‡§ The expression of genes is regulated at many levels. Perhaps the area in which least is known is how nuclear organization influences gene expression. Studies of higher-order chromatin arrangements and their dynamic interactions with other nuclear components have been boosted by recent technical advances. The emerging view is that chromosomes are compartmentalized into discrete territories. The location of a gene within a chromosome territory seems to influence its access to the machinery responsible for specific nuclear functions, such as transcription and splicing. This view is consistent with a topological model for gene regulation. EPIGENETICS Despite all the celebrations associated with the tion of gene expression and other nuclear functions — Any heritable influence (in the sequencing of the human genome, and the genomes of namely the architecture of the nucleus as a whole3–14.In progeny of cells or of individuals) other model organisms, our abilities to interpret particular, we describe evidence for a compartmental- on gene activity, unaccompanied genome sequences are quite limited. For example, we ized nuclear architecture in the mammalian cell nucle- by a change in DNA sequence. cannot understand the orchestrated activity — and the us based on chromosome territories (CTs) and an silencing — of many thousands of genes in any given interchromatin compartment (IC) that contains *Institute of Anthropology cell just on the basis of DNA sequences, such as pro- macromolecular complexes that are required for repli- and Human Genetics, 12 Ludwig Maximilians moter and enhancer elements. How are the profound cation, transcription, splicing and repair (summa- University, Richard Wagner differences in gene activities established and main- rized in FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Metaphase and Interphase Detection of the Breakpoint Region In
    GENES, CHROMOSOMES & CANCER 4:69-74 (1992) Specific Metaphase and lnterphase Detection of the Breakpoint Region in 8q24 of Burkitt Lymphoma Cells by Triple-Color Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Thomas Ried, Christoph Lengauer, Thomas Cremer, Joop Wiegant, Anton K. Raap, Mels van der Ploeg, Peter Groitl, and Martin Lipp Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, Univenity of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany (T.R., C.L.. T.C.); Department of Cytochemistry and Cytometry, Medical Faculty of Leiden Univenity, Leiden, The Netherlands U.W., A.K.R., M.v.d.P.); Institute of Biochemistry, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany (P.G., M.L.) Triple fluorescence in situ hybridization with a plasmid DNA library from sorted human chromosomes 8 in combination with bacteriophage clones flanking the breakpoint in 8q24 of the Burkitt lymphoma cell line )I was used for the specific delineation of this breakpoint in individual tumor cells. With this approach, tumor-specific breakpoints in translocation chromosomes can be detected at all stages of the cell cycle with high specificity. Genes Chrorn Cancer 4:69-74 (1992). INTRODUCTION al., 1988b; Lichter et al., 1988; Pinkel et al., 1988). Its application in interphase cytogenetics, however, can Specific chromosomal translocations in Burkitt’s create problems of interpretation due to the more ex- lymphoma (BL) were first demonstrated by the pio- tended nature of the signals from painted chromo- neering work of Manolov and Manolova (1972) and some domains. The construction of nested sets of Zech et al. (1976). In addition to the translocation DNA probes that span a chromosome region of inter- t(8;14), which has been found in some 75% of cases, est has been proposed as a tool to visualize tumor- variant translocations t(2;8) and t(8;22) have been de- specific chromosome breakpoints at all stages of the scribed (for review, see Heim and Mitelman, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • From Human Cytogenetics to Human Chromosomics
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review From Human Cytogenetics to Human Chromosomics Thomas Liehr Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany; [email protected]; Tel.: +49-36451-9396850 Received: 10 January 2019; Accepted: 12 February 2019; Published: 14 February 2019 Abstract: Background: The concept of “chromosomics” was introduced by Prof. Uwe Claussen in 2005. Herein, the growing insights into human chromosome structure finally lead to a “chromosomic view” of the three-dimensional constitution and plasticity of genes in interphase nuclei are discussed. This review is dedicated to the memory of Prof. Uwe Claussen (30 April 1945–20 July 2008). Recent findings: Chromosomics is the study of chromosomes, their three-dimensional positioning in the interphase nucleus, the consequences from plasticity of chromosomal subregions and gene interactions, the influence of chromatin-modification-mediated events on cells, and even individuals, evolution, and disease. Progress achieved in recent years is summarized, including the detection of chromosome-chromosome-interactions which, if damaged, lead to malfunction and disease. However, chromosomics in the Human Genetics field is not progressing presently, as research interest has shifted from single cell to high throughput, genomic approaches. Conclusion: Chromosomics and its impact were predicted correctly in 2005 by Prof. Claussen. Although some progress was achieved, present reconsiderations of the role of the chromosome and the single cell in Human Genetic research are urgently necessary. Keywords: chromosomes; cytogenetics; chromosomics; interphase-architecture; epigenetics 1. Introduction Prof. Uwe Claussen (30 April 1945–20 July 2008) was a Human Geneticist and brilliant scientist with specific interest in cytogenetics and chromosome biology [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Simultaneous Visualization of Seven Different DNA Probes by in Situ
    Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 1388-1392, February 1992 Genetics Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy (PCR-probe labeling/CCD camera/gene mappilg/centromere repeats/cytogenetics) THOMAS RIED*, ANTONIO BALDINI, TIMOTHY C. RAND, AND DAVID C. WARD Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510-8005 Communicated by Nina Federoff, December 2, 1991 ABSTRACT Combinatorial labeling of probes (i.e., with Blue. With four labeling and fluorescent detection systems, two or more different reporters) increases the number oftarget the number ofdifferent targets could be increased to 15, again sequences that can be detected simultaneously by fluorescence assuming that only equimolar mixtures of reporters in all in situ hybridization. We have used an epifluorescence micro- pairwise and triple-labeling combinations are used. Using a scope equipped with a digital imaging camera and computer conventional epifluorescence microscope and photomicros- software for pseudocoloring and merging images to disuish copy, these theoretical possibilities would be difficult to up to seven different probes using only three fluorochromes. achieve in practice, mainly because multiple exposures of Chromosome-specific centromere repeat clones and chromo- color film cannot adequately display and resolve images from some-specific "composite" probe sets were generated by PCR combinatorially labeled probes. This restriction should be in which different mixtures of modified nucleotides, including overcome with digital imaging camera systems, such as fluorescein-coijugated dUTP, were incorporated. Cosmid silicon intensified tube or charge coupled device (CCD) clones were labeled similarly by nick-translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Thomas Cremer
    Thomas Cremer Four decades ago most molecular biologists viewed the nucleus as a scarcely structured organelle with intermingling chromatin fibres drifting around in the nuclear sap. Thomas Cremer was one of the first supporters of the idea that cell type specific higher order chromatin arrangements of the nucleus are essential for cardinal nuclear functions, such as DNA replication, DNA repair and regulation of gene transcription. Spatial organization of chromatin, now considered as the highest level of epigenetic gene regulation, has been the main focus of the T. Cremer’s research since the early 1970s. Together with two physicists, his brother Christoph Cremer and Christian Zorn, T. Cremer pioneered laser-UV-microbeam experi- ments (1974). They demonstrated that after microirradiation of a small portion of an interphase nucleus, damage was restricted to a few chromosomes in the subsequent mitosis. This result implied a territorial organization of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus. In 1978 Thomas Cremer (again, in collaboration with Christoph Cremer) published a proposal for the construction of a confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscope with the goal of 3D imaging of cells. In the 1980s T. Cremer contributed to the development of a method for the visualization of individual chromosome territories by in situ hybridization (initially, using radioactive labeling) with chromosome–specific DNA probes. His concept of interphase cytogenetics (1976) had a broad impact in the field of clinical and tumor cytogenetics. Together with P. Lichter, T. Cremer also belongs to the pioneers of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) performed on diploid metaphase spreads (1983) and of CGH arrays performed on a matrix with an ordered set of defined nucleic acid target sequences (1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Interchromatin Compartment Participates in the Structural and Functional Organization of the Cell Nucleus
    The Interchromatin Compartment Participates in the Structural and Functional Organization of the Cell Nucleus Cremer, Thomas; Cremer, Marion; Hübner, Barbara; Silahtaroglu, Asli; Hendzel, Michael; Lanctôt, Christian; Strickfaden, Hilmar; Cremer, Christoph Published in: BioEssays DOI: 10.1002/bies.201900132 Publication date: 2020 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY-NC Citation for published version (APA): Cremer, T., Cremer, M., Hübner, B., Silahtaroglu, A., Hendzel, M., Lanctôt, C., Strickfaden, H., & Cremer, C. (2020). The Interchromatin Compartment Participates in the Structural and Functional Organization of the Cell Nucleus. BioEssays, 42(2), [1900132]. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900132 Download date: 05. okt.. 2021 PROBLEMS & PARADIGMS Prospects & Overviews www.bioessays-journal.com The Interchromatin Compartment Participates in the Structural and Functional Organization of the Cell Nucleus Thomas Cremer,* Marion Cremer, Barbara Hübner, Asli Silahtaroglu, Michael Hendzel, Christian Lanctôt, Hilmar Strickfaden,* and Christoph Cremer* inseparably connected with their functional This article focuses on the role of the interchromatin compartment (IC) in tasks at all levels, from molecules to genes, shaping nuclear landscapes. The IC is connected with nuclear pore complexes chromatin domains (CDs), chromosome (NPCs) and harbors splicing speckles and nuclear bodies. It is postulated that territories, and the functional nuclear orga- the IC provides routes for imported transcription factors to target sites, for nization at large. The “top-down” approach to explore nu- export routes of mRNA as ribonucleoproteins toward NPCs, as well as for the clear structure and function started in the intranuclear passage of regulatory RNAs from sites of transcription to remote nineteenth century with the discovery of functional sites (IC hypothesis).
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday April 7
    Cellular Oncology 27 (2005) 105–118 105 IOS Press Thursday April 7 PREMIER LECTURE SERIES (ICCond) with a concomitant enlargement of the IC Location: PFC G07 occurs rapidly, when living cells are exposed to a hyper- osmotic medium. Cells, which were kept up to 30 min in the ICCond state, before they were released to normal PL5 09.00-09.40 osmotic conditions, retained their viability. Exposure of cells to several, short cycles of ICCond and decondensa- Professor Thomas Cremer tion yielded highly reproducible patterns of condensed Department Biology II, Ludwig and normal chromatin textures. During ICCond individ- Maximilians University, Munich, ual CTs could still be delineated as distinct objects using Germany chromosome painting. Interestingly, neighboring CTs were not fully separated from each other, but formed a 3D higher order chromatin network. The contact sites of chromatin from different CTs have not yet been identi- fied. Splicing speckles, nuclear bodies and several pro- FROM CHROMOSOME TERRITORIES TO A teins, described as markers for a nuclear matrix, were FUNCTIONAL NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE detected within the enlarged IC. Nascent transcripts, pulse-labeled immediately prior to ICCond with BrUTP, Thomas Cremer, Heiner Albiez, Andreas Bolzer, Daniela were detected at the surface of condensed chromatin Köhler, Katrin Küpper, Stefan Müller, Michaela Neusser, streaks lining the enlarged IC. This and other experi- Lothar Schermelleh, Heinrich Leonhardt, Babett Wagler, ments argue that for transcription genes must be posi- Roman Zinner, Marion Cremer, Irina Solovei tioned in perichromatin regions lining the IC or on chro- Department Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University, matin loops expanding into the IC. Transcription as well Munich, Grosshadernerstr.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,197,501 B1 Cremer Et Al
    USOO61975O1B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,197,501 B1 Cremer et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Mar. 6, 2001 (54) ARRANGEMENT OF NUCLEIC ACID OTHER PUBLICATIONS SEQUENCES FOR COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRDIZATION Ng et al., “Methods for analysis of multiple cystic fibrosis mutations”, Hum. Genet. 87:613-617, 1991.* (75) Inventors: Thomas Cremer; Thomas Ried; Bentz et al., “Comparative genomic hybridization in the Michael Speicher, all of Heidelberg; investigation of myeloid leukemias', Genes Chromosomes Anna Jauch, Heddesheim; Peter Cancer 12:193–200, 1995.* Lichter, Gaiberg, all of (DE) Speicher et al., “Correlation of microscopic phenotype with genotype in a formalin fixed, paraffin embedded testicular (73) Assignee: Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, germ cell tumor with universal DNA amplification, com Heidelberg (DE) parative genomic hybridization and interphase cytogenics', Am. J. Pathology 146(6) Jun. 1995.* (*) Notice: This patent issued on a continued pros “Oncogene Amplification”, Seminars in Cancer Biology, ecution application filed under 37 CFR Feb. 1993. 1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year O.P. Kallioniemi et al., “Comparqative Genomic Hybridiza patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C. tion: A Rapid New Method for Detecting and Mapping DNA 154(a)(2). Amplification in Tumors”, Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 4, 1993: pp. 41–46. Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this S. Du Manoir et al. “Detection of Complete and Partial patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Chromosome Gains and LOSSes by Comparative Genomic in U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Situ Hybridization”, Human Genetics (1993) 90: 590-610. Dudin et al., "Sorting of chromosomes by magnetic Sepera (21) Appl.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations on a Laser-Scanning-Microscope With
    ^ E21954F MICROSCOPICA ACTA JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPIC EQUIPMENT, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS EDITORS R. D. Allen, Hanover/USA-W. Boguth, Basel-L. Jenny, Basel-O. Johari, Chicago E. Kellenberger, Basel • H. Rohr, Basel • W. Stockem, Bonn NUMBER 1 . VOLUME 81 • SEPTEMBER 1978 S. HIRZEL VERLAG STUTTGART Microsc Acta ISSN 0044-376 X MICROSCOPICA ACTA Journal of microscopic equipment, methods and applications formerly Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Mikroskopie und mikroskopische Technik Editors: Prof. Dr. R. D. Allen, Prof. Dr. W. Boguth, Prof. Dr. L. Jenny, Dr. O. Johari, Prof. Dr. E. Kellenberger, Prof. Dr. H. Rohr, Prof. Dr. W. Stockem Co-Editiorial Board L. Albert, Karlsruhe • O. von Deimling, Freiburg i. Br. • D. Gerlach, Erlangen • H. Hasel• mann, Tübingen • H. Haug, Lübeck • L. Hottinger, Basel • G. Kiefer, Freiburg i. Br. • A. Läuchli, Hannover • K. Lickfeld, Essen • M.-Th. Mackowsky, Essen • K. Michel, Aalen • H. Mörtel, Erlangen • J. S. Ploem, Leiden • M. Pluta, Warszawa • H. Raith, Dortmund • A. Schaefer, Heerbrugg • Kl. P. SchindT, Wien • F. Thon, Berlin • E. Treiber, Stockholm MICROSCOPIA ACTA publishes reviews, original papers, reports and references to literature covering the whole field of light and electron microscopy with regard to the aspect of micro- scopy technique. MICSROSCOPIA ACTA veröffentlichen Übersichtsbeiträge, Originalarbeiten, Berichte und Literaturhinweise, die das Gebiet der Lichtmikroskopie und der Elektronenmikroskopie unter dem Gesichtspunkt der mikroskopischen Technik behandeln. Contributions will be accepted in English, Ger• MICROSCOPIA ACTA man or French and should be submitted to the Prof. Dr. Louis Jenny, Bäumlihofstr. 375 Acting Etidor: CH-4125 Riehen/Switzerland Manuskripte können in deutscher, englischer oder französicher Sprache abgefaßt sein. Sie Tel. Private: (0 61) 49 59 69 sind bei der Redaktion einzureichen: Institute: (0 61) 43 44 15 Terms of delivery The Journal is published in issues combined to a volume of approximately 450 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Chromodynamics
    Nuclear chromodynamics KITP UCSB January 11, 2016 Alexander Grosberg Center for Soft Matter Research Department of Physics, New York University Problem: why is it difficult to manage DNA? • Human genome length about 2 meters; • Nucleus size 10 micron; • Increase all scales by a factor of a million: • length 2000 kilometers; • diameter 2 mm; • packed in a few meters sized car... Ropes, threads, wires… Viruses do it Francoise Livolant, ENS Paris Some examples, with numbers: Organism Genome Stored in… Ratio length Human 2 m 10 mm 200,000 Mouse 1.8 m 8 mm 200,000 Fruit Fly 5 cm 5 mm 10,000 Yeast 4 mm 2 mm 2000 Bacteria 1.5 mm 1 mm 1500 (E.coli) Virus (T4) 0.05 mm 0.05 mm 1000 Chromatin and cell nucleus Interphase: swollen chromosomes Metaphase: chromosomes are condensed Walther Flemming, 1880 Hierarchial organization Luger & Richmond,Luger 1997 Image from the cover of: “Molecular and Cellular Biology,” Stephen L. Wolfe, 1993 Figure 4-22 Molecular Biology of the Cell (© Garland Science 2008) Chromosome territories Christoph Cremer, Heidelberg/Mainz a | 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained, diploid, chicken metaphase spread with macro- and microchromosomes. b | The same metaphase spread after multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization with pseudocoloured chromosomes. Chicken chromosome paint probes (image courtesy of Johannes Thomas Cremer, Wienberg) were labelled by a combinatorial scheme with oestradiol (1, 4, 5, 6), LMU Munich digoxigenin (2, 4, 6, Z) and biotin (3, 5, 6, Z). c | Oestradiol- and digoxigenin- labelled probes were detected using secondary antibodies labelled with Cy3 and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC); biotinylated probes were detected with Cy5- conjugated streptavidin.
    [Show full text]