DOCSLIB.ORG

A Taxonomic Revision of the Malesian Species of <I>Lasianthus</I>

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Taxonomic Revision of the Malesian Species of <I>Lasianthus</I> Blumea 57, 2012: 1–102 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651912X652012 A taxonomic revision of the Malesian species of Lasianthus (Rubiaceae) H. Zhu1, M.C. Roos2, C.E. Ridsdale2 Key words Abstract Based on herbarium collections, the Malesian species of the genus Lasianthus are revised. A total of 131 species including 5 subspecies and 6 varieties are recognized from the Malesian region, of which 41 species, Lasiantheae 3 subspecies and 3 varieties are described as new, and 3 new combinations are made for varieties. 22 species Lasianthus names and 15 variety names are reduced to synonyms. Ten species names and 2 varieties are treated as dubious Malesia mainly because their types cannot be traced. Additionally, 11 species are further excluded from Lasianthus. All revision species are described and a key to Malesian Lasianthus is given. Rubiaceae Published on 29 May 2012 INTRODUCTION 1938. Since 1950, many more specimens from the Malesian region have been collected, but a synopsis on the genus for Lasianthus Jack is a large genus of the Rubiaceae with more Malesia has not been made so far, except for two regional flora than 180 species, predominantly in the Old World. The great- treatments, i.e. Bakhuizen van den Brink (1965) for Java (treat- est species diversity is found in tropical Asia (Robbrecht 1988), ing 29 species including 2 provisional names) and Wong (1989) where some 160 species occur, only one extending into Aus- for the Peninsular Malaysia (dealing with 54 species including 8 tralia. The species of the genus occur almost exclusively in the unnamed ones). Therefore, the present revision of Lasianthus understory of primary forests, and have limited potential for from Malesia is most needed. Here we recognize 131 species physiological acclimation to high light levels (Cai et al. 2005). from the Malesian region, of which 41 species, 3 subspecies There are occasionally records from secondary or seriously and 3 varieties are described as new, and 3 new combinations disturbed forests or forest edges. Lasianthus species are usu- are made for varieties. 22 species names and 15 variety names ally present in large numbers in the tropical forests of Asia and are reduced to synonyms. 10 species names and 2 varieties may therefore represent an ecologically important element. are treated as dubious mainly because their types could not be The species of Lasianthus also show interesting distribution traced. Additionally, 11 species are excluded from Lasianthus. patterns, which are of special interest for the study of the bio- geography of tropical Asia and of prevailing speciation models in tropical rainforests. METHODS The tropical Asian representatives of the genus are regarded This paper is a classic taxonomic revision on the genus La­ to be extremely difficult taxonomically. The flowers and fruits sianthus for Malesian species based mainly on morphological are small and often shed from herbarium specimens. There are characters. The authors examined all collections from the only a few diagnostic characters available for delineating the Malesian region in AAU, BM, K, L, and U, and a selection of the species and the majority of the characters used are quantitative Malesian collections in the herbaria BKF, KEP, MO, and SING. features of the vegetative organs such as leaves, stipules, and Type specimens in C, E, HBG, NY, P, SING, US have also been bracts. It is therefore difficult to correctly determine a species checked. The species presentation is in alphabetical order. by referring to old descriptions only. In most herbaria that we The arrangement of synonyms is organized chronologically in visited, misidentifications of Lasianthus specimens were fre- homotypic paragraphs. All cited specimens are examined by quent. Quite some earlier species and even newly recognized the authors except a few type specimens which are indicated species have been described from a single type collection or as ‘n.v.’. a few collections only. Some types of Korthals’ species, which In total, all c. 3 600 specimens in K and L were examined. should be in Leiden, could not be traced, while others were Additional specimens from AAU received on loan were also destroyed in Berlin during the World War II. Even the holotype examined. More than 95 % of the Lasianthus collections in K of the type species of the genus L. cyanocarpus was destroyed and L have been identified for the present study. A small number by a fire in 1824 (Merrill 1952). of specimens, which do not belong to the species presently About 140 species names and numerous varieties were pub- recognized, could not be treated because of imperfect state lished based on Malesian collections (see below, Taxonomic (lacking complete flowers or fruits). All published names from History). All of these names except two were published before the Malesian region are covered in the present work. Nomen- clature and typification follow the International Code of Botanical 1 Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, P.R. China; Nomenclature (McNeill et al. 2006). Lectotypifications for some corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]. of Blume’s species are made. Neotypifications are also made 2 Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis (section NHN), Leiden Uni- for some species of which we could not trace type materials versity, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. and which are most probably lost. © 2012 Nationaal Herbarium Nederland You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. 2 Blumea – Volume 57 / 1, 2012 TAXONOMIC HISTORY Lasianthus as defined here has drupes or pyrenes with a thick wall. Species that show drupes with a thin wall (and do not Generic delimitation belong to Saprosma nor Amaracarpus), are here treated as Lasianthus Jack was established in 1823 based on two Su- dubious taxa. Their systematic position needs further study. matran species, Lasianthus cyanocarpus (later selected as Piesschaert (2001) studied the carpology of Psychotrieae and the type of the genus; see below) and Lasianthus attenuatus. gave a definition of Lasianthus as having a gynoecium with In the same year Blume (1823) listed several plant species 4–12 locules that develops into a drupe with 4–12 pyrenes. In under the genus name Mephitidia attributed to Reinwardt but our present treatment, we restrict Lasianthus to species with described one species M. hexandra himself. The genus was re- drupes with 2–9 mature pyrenes with a thick wall that develop described two years later by Reinwardt (1825), but no species from ovaries with 2–9 locules for the Asian representatives. were mentioned by him. According to the International Code Petit (1964) and Denys (1981) discussed that African species of Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill et al. 2006), the genus have pyrenes with a pre-formed oval to circular germination Mephitidia is attributed to Reinwardt ex Blume with M. hexandra lid that could easily removed. However, for Asian species, few Blume as type. Blume (1826–1827) realized that Mephitidia was studies of the germination lids of pyrenes have been carried out. synonymous with Lasianthus Jack and provided accounts of the Javanese species. Mephitidia continued to be used by some Delimitation of the species authors because they were aware of an earlier publication of The African taxa have to some extent been treated by Verdcourt Lasianthus Adans. (= Gordonia) for a genus in the Theaceae. (1976) for tropical East Africa. Denys (1981) revised the genus De Candolle (1830) was the most significant of these authors for Central Africa. There seems to be less work on the three and Korthals (1851) was the last author to use Mephitidia for the American species, however, Robbrecht (1982) commented upon Malesian species in taxonomic publications. Later, Lasianthus two of these on the occasion of a discussion of the synonymy Jack has been conserved for the genus treated here. of the Panamanian endemic genus Dressleriopsis. Blume (1823) described from Java a monotypic genus Lito­ Important for mainland SE Asia is the work of Hooker (1880) santhes, which is closely related to Lasianthus. Inherently who recognized some 52 species and placed them all in a sub- Ridley (1923a) reduced this genus to a section of Lasianthus, generic classification (see below, Infrageneric Classification). however Bakhuizen van den Brink (1965) retained Litosanthes Subsequently regional flora accounts were produced for former as a separate genus based on three characters: imbricate co- ‘Indo-Chine’ (Pitard 1924) and for Thailand (Craib 1934). Later rolla, forked stipules, and pedunculate inflorescences. Deb & Yamazaki (1964) revised the genus for the Ryukyu Islands Gangopadhyay (1991) transferred some Indian taxa to Litosan­ and Liu & Chao (1964) treated the Taiwanese species. Zhu thes, but subsequently Gangopadhyay & Chakrabarty (1992) (1994, 2002) treated the Chinese Lasianthus and then revised reduced these taxa of Litosanthes to a section of Lasianthus the genus for Thailand (Zhu 2001b). The taxa from the Indian (see section below). subcontinent have received considerable attention in recent The circumscription of Lasianthus Jack was more or less modi- years: Deb & Gangopadhyay (1989, 1991) for India and Rids- fied by later authors, especially referring to the number of ovary dale (1998) for Sri Lanka.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Intergeneric Hybrid Between Franklinia Alatamaha and Gordonia
    HORTSCIENCE 41(6):1386–1388. 2006. hybrids using F. alatamaha. Ackerman and Williams (1982) conducted extensive crosses · between F. alatamaha and Camellia L. spp. Gordlinia grandiflora (Theaceae): and produced two intergeneric hybrids, but their growth was weak and extremely slow. An Intergeneric Hybrid Between Ranney and colleagues (2003) reported suc- cessful hybridization between F. alatamaha Franklinia alatamaha and and Schima argentea Pritz. In 1974, Dr. Elwin Orton, Jr. successfully crossed G. lasianthus with F. alatamaha and produced 33 hybrids Gordonia lasianthus (Orton, 1977). Orton (1977) further reported Thomas G. Ranney1,2 that the seedlings grew vigorously during the Department of Horticultural Science, Mountain Horticultural Crops first growing season and that a number of them flowered the following year; however, Research and Extension Center, North Carolina State University, 455 all the plants eventually died, possibly be- Research Dr., Fletcher, NC 28732-9244 cause of some type of genetic incompatibility 1 or a pathogen (e.g., Phytophthora). Although Paul R. Fantz Orton’s report was somewhat discouraging, Department of Horticultural Science, Box 7603, North Carolina State hybridization between F. alatamaha and University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609 G. lasianthus could potentially combine the cold hardiness of F. alatamaha with the ever- Additional index words. Gordonia alatamaha, Gordonia pubescens, distant hybridization, green foliage of G. lasianthus and broaden intergeneric hybridization, plant breeding, wide hybridization the genetic base for further breeding among Abstract. Franklinia alatamaha Bartr. ex Marshall represents a monotypic genus that was these genera. The objective of this report is originally discovered in Georgia, USA, but is now considered extinct in the wild and is to describe the history of and to validate new maintained only in cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Plant Diversity of Singapore
    FLORA OF SINGAPORE (Vol. 1: 37–46, 2019) 4. THE PLANT DIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE K.M. Wong & S.K. Ganesan The position of Singapore on the Sunda continental shelf is a special one, with the principal island originally about 540 km2 in extent, together with some 60 smaller islands at the southern exit to the Malacca Strait and near the confluence of the South China Sea and Karimata Strait just west of Borneo. Geographically at the equatorial extremity of the Malay Peninsula, Singapore is separated from the Riau islands to its south (principally the Karimun Islands, Batam and Bintan) by the Singapore Strait which includes the deeply scoured 204-m ‘Singapore Deeps’, a likely subsidence basin resulting from tectonic movements (Bird et al., 2006). While this Strait may seem able to restrict the dispersal of some organisms with interglacial and post- Pleistocene high sea levels, it probably was not an effective dispersal barrier during episodes of lowest sea levels, such as during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) at 18 ka. Then, it must have been in the path of a key land bridge between mainland Southeast Asia farther north and likewise exposed links to Java and other areas to the south (Ho, 1960; Morley & Flenley, 1987; Heaney, 1991; Voris, 2000; Bird et al., 2005). By contrast, the Johor Strait that separates Singapore from south Peninsular Malaysia is just about 10 m deep and 600 m wide at its narrowest. The Sundaland region on the Sunda continental shelf has seen climate shifts since even before the Pleistocene, sometimes associated with tectonic events.
    [Show full text]
  • New Distribution Records for Flowering Plants in Antigonish County, Nova Scotia
    PROC. N.S. INST. SCI. (2008) Volume 44, Part 2, pp. 109-123 NEW DISTRIBUTION RECORDS FOR FLOWERING PLANTS IN ANTIGONISH COUNTY, NOVA SCOTIA BARRY R. TAYLOR, JONATHAN FERRIER, RANDOLPH LAUFF, DAVID J. GARBARY* Department of Biology St. Francis Xavier University P.O. Box 5000 Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5 Distributions of over 50 species of flowering plants from Antigonish County, Nova Scotia are presented based on collections made primarily over the last ten years. Some of these are new county records representing range extensions from the western and central parts of the province. Many are new records for the eastern mainland and north shores of the province. Rare species discussed are Asclepias incarnata, Comandra umbellata and Triosteum aurantiacum. Several species, including Asparagus officinalis, Centaurea cyanus, Lathyrus latifolius, Lysimachia nummularia, and Origanum vulgare, likely represent recent or older garden escapes. Sedum ochroleucum is reported outside of cultivation for the first time from Nova Scotia, based on a single population that has been established for at least two years. On décrit la répartition de plus de 50 espèces d’angiospermes dans le comté d’Antigonish (Nouvelle-Écosse), d’après des collectes effectuées essentiellement les dix dernières années. Il s’agit parfois de nouveaux cas signalés dans le comté, représentant des prolongements de l’aire de répartition depuis l’ouest et le centre de la province et, dans bien d’autres cas, de nouveaux signalements pour l’est de la péninsule et les côtes nord de la province. Les espèces rares présentées sont Asclepias incarnata, Comandra umbellata et Triosteum aurantiacum. Plusieurs espèces comme Asparagus officinalis, Centaurea cyanus, Lathyrus latifolius, Lysimachia nummularia et Origanum vulgare sont vraisemblablement des plantes échappées de cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Identity of the Long-Overlooked Ronabea Morindoides and Patabea Tenuiflora, Synonymous with a Species of Appunia (Rubiaceae)
    The identity of the long-overlooked Ronabea morindoides and Patabea tenuiflora, synonymous with a species of Appunia (Rubiaceae) Piero G. Delprete, Charlotte M. Taylor & Timothy D. McDowell Abstract DELPRETE, P.G., C.M. TAYLOR & T.D. MCDOWELL (2021). The identity of the long-overlooked Ronabea morindoides and Patabea tenuiflora, synonymous with a species of Appunia (Rubiaceae). Candollea 76: 83 – 92. In English, English abstract. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15553/c2021v761a8 The identity of Ronabea morindoides A. Rich. has long been unclear and is here investigated. Two sheets of original mate- rial corresponding to this name are deposited in the General Herbarium of the National Museum of Natural History of Paris (P), and represent a mixed collection; one part of this material corresponds better with the description of this taxon and is more unambiguously identifiable, and is here designated the lectotype. With this typification, Ronabea morindoides represents a species of Appunia Hook. f. The identity of Patabea tenuiflora DC. has also remained uncertain since its description and is here clarified by studying the holotype in the Candolle Herbarium (G-DC); this is an addi- tional synonym of R. morindoides. Taxonomic review of this group in the Guianas also finds thatRonabea morindoides is an older name for Appunia brachycalyx (Bremek.) Steyerm. and Appunia surinamensis Bremek. (Morindeae). Therefore, the new combination Appunia morindoides (A. Rich.) Delprete, C.M. Taylor & T. McDowell is here published. Keywords RUBIACEAE – Lasiantheae – Morindeae – Palicoureeae – Psychotriae – Appunia – Morinda – Patabea – Psychotria – French Guiana – Surinam – New Combination Addresses of the authors: PGD: AMAP Lab, IRD, CNRS, CIRAD, INRA, Université de Montpellier, 34398 Montpellier, France; AMAP Lab, IRD, Herbier de Guyane, B.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Dipsacales, with Special Reference to Sinadoxa and Tetradoxa (Adoxaceae)
    PHYLOGENY AND PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY OF DIPSACALES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SINADOXA AND TETRADOXA (ADOXACEAE) MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE,1 TORSTEN ERIKSSON,2 PATRICK A. REEVES,3 AND RICHARD G. OLMSTEAD 3 Abstract. To further clarify phylogenetic relationships within Dipsacales,we analyzed new and previously pub- lished rbcL sequences, alone and in combination with morphological data. We also examined relationships within Adoxaceae using rbcL and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. We conclude from these analyses that Dipsacales comprise two major lineages:Adoxaceae and Caprifoliaceae (sensu Judd et al.,1994), which both contain elements of traditional Caprifoliaceae.Within Adoxaceae, the following relation- ships are strongly supported: (Viburnum (Sambucus (Sinadoxa (Tetradoxa, Adoxa)))). Combined analyses of C ap ri foliaceae yield the fo l l ow i n g : ( C ap ri folieae (Diervilleae (Linnaeeae (Morinaceae (Dipsacaceae (Triplostegia,Valerianaceae)))))). On the basis of these results we provide phylogenetic definitions for the names of several major clades. Within Adoxaceae, Adoxina refers to the clade including Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa, and Adoxa.This lineage is marked by herbaceous habit, reduction in the number of perianth parts,nectaries of mul- ticellular hairs on the perianth,and bifid stamens. The clade including Morinaceae,Valerianaceae, Triplostegia, and Dipsacaceae is here named Valerina. Probable synapomorphies include herbaceousness,presence of an epi- calyx (lost or modified in Valerianaceae), reduced endosperm,and distinctive chemistry, including production of monoterpenoids. The clade containing Valerina plus Linnaeeae we name Linnina. This lineage is distinguished by reduction to four (or fewer) stamens, by abortion of two of the three carpels,and possibly by supernumerary inflorescences bracts. Keywords: Adoxaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales, ITS, morphological characters, phylogeny, phylogenetic taxonomy, phylogenetic nomenclature, rbcL, Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa.
    [Show full text]
  • ISB: Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants
    Longleaf Pine Preserve Plant List Acanthaceae Asteraceae Wild Petunia Ruellia caroliniensis White Aster Aster sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia Adoxaceae Begger-ticks Bidens mitis Walter's Viburnum Viburnum obovatum Deer Tongue Carphephorus paniculatus Pineland Daisy Chaptalia tomentosa Alismataceae Goldenaster Chrysopsis gossypina Duck Potato Sagittaria latifolia Cow Thistle Cirsium horridulum Tickseed Coreopsis leavenworthii Altingiaceae Elephant's foot Elephantopus elatus Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Oakleaf Fleabane Erigeron foliosus var. foliosus Fleabane Erigeron sp. Amaryllidaceae Prairie Fleabane Erigeron strigosus Simpson's rain lily Zephyranthes simpsonii Fleabane Erigeron vernus Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Anacardiaceae Dog Fennel Eupatorium compositifolium Winged Sumac Rhus copallinum Dog Fennel Eupatorium spp. Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans Slender Flattop Goldenrod Euthamia caroliniana Flat-topped goldenrod Euthamia minor Annonaceae Cudweed Gamochaeta antillana Flag Pawpaw Asimina obovata Sneezeweed Helenium pinnatifidum Dwarf Pawpaw Asimina pygmea Blazing Star Liatris sp. Pawpaw Asimina reticulata Roserush Lygodesmia aphylla Rugel's pawpaw Deeringothamnus rugelii Hempweed Mikania cordifolia White Topped Aster Oclemena reticulata Apiaceae Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia Button Rattlesnake Master Eryngium yuccifolium Rosy Camphorweed Pluchea rosea Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Pluchea Pluchea spp. Mock Bishopweed Ptilimnium capillaceum Rabbit Tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Honey Bee Plants1 Mary Christine Bammer, William H Kern, and Jamie D
    ENY-171 Florida Honey Bee Plants1 Mary Christine Bammer, William H Kern, and Jamie D. Ellis2 Several factors influence the flora throughout Florida, While many plants are acceptable pollen producers for including annual freezes, average temperature, annual honey bees, fewer yield enough nectar to produce a surplus rainfall, and soil composition. Because of these variations, honey crop. The tables in this document list the nectar- plants that grow well in one region may not grow well bearing plants that are present to some degree in each in another. Climate, plant communities, and timing of region and the plants’ respective bloom times. Please note, floral resources differ significantly between the three main any nectar plants that are considered invasive in Florida regions in Florida: north Florida, central Florida, and south have been excluded from this list. Florida (north Florida encompasses the panhandle region south through Alachua, Levy, Putnam, and Flagler counties. Central Florida includes Marion County south through Sarasota County. South Florida encompasses the remaining counties including the Keys) (Figure 1). Figure 2. Honey bee on wild mustard. Figure 1. 1. This document is ENY-171, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date September 2018. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Mary Christine Bammer, Extension coordinator, Department of Entomology and Nematology; William H Kern, associate professor of urban entomology, Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Ft. Lauderdale Research & Education Center; and Jamie D. Ellis, associate professor, Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY John C. Stennis Space Center Environmental Resources Document
    SCWI-8500-0026-ENV Rev. C November 2012 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John C. Stennis Space Center Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000 COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY John C. Stennis Space Center Environmental Resources Document RELEASED - Printed documents may be obsolete; validate prior to use. Stennis SCWI-8500-0026-ENV C Common Work Number Rev. Effective Date: November 21, 2012 Instruction Review Date: November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 268 Responsible Office: RA02/Environmental Management – Center Operations Directorate SUBJECT: Environmental Resources Document This document was prepared under the Stennis Space Center (SSC) Facility Operating Services Contract for the NASA/SSC Center Operations and Support Directorate in support of the SSC Environmental Management System (EMS). Approval/Concurrence Original Signed by David K. Lorance 11/21/2012 NASA/SSC Environmental Officer Date Document History Log Change/ Change Date Originator/ Phone Description Revision Basic 12.9.2005 Wendy Robinson Initial release. 8-2752 A 01.31.2006 Wendy Robinson Changed the effective date to January 31, 2006 8-2752 throughout the document. Changed the review date to January 31, 2011 to reflect 5 years from the effective date throughout the document. Changed the word “revise” date to “review” date in the header throughout the document. Page i – Added signature section above Document History Log. Page ii - Changed telephone number of contact agency to 2584. B 10.03.2008 Jenette Gordon Reviewed and redlined all sections to reflect regulatory 8-1416 changes per media. The section for Natural Resources was rewritten to incorporate the SSC Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan requirements. Additionally, the effective date was changed to May 30, 2008 throughout the document along with the review date to May 30, 2013 to reflect 5 years from the effective date throughout the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Natural Heritage Program Special Plants - Tracking List -2018
    MISSISSIPPI NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM SPECIAL PLANTS - TRACKING LIST -2018- Approximately 3300 species of vascular plants (fern, gymnosperms, and angiosperms), and numerous non-vascular plants may be found in Mississippi. Many of these are quite common. Some, however, are known or suspected to occur in low numbers; these are designated as species of special concern, and are listed below. There are 495 special concern plants, which include 4 non- vascular plants, 28 ferns and fern allies, 4 gymnosperms, and 459 angiosperms 244 dicots and 215 monocots. An additional 100 species are designated “watch” status (see “Special Plants - Watch List”) with the potential of becoming species of special concern and include 2 fern and fern allies, 54 dicots and 44 monocots. This list is designated for the primary purposes of : 1) in environmental assessments, “flagging” of sensitive species that may be negatively affected by proposed actions; 2) determination of protection priorities of natural areas that contain such species; and 3) determination of priorities of inventory and protection for these plants, including the proposed listing of species for federal protection. GLOBAL STATE FEDERAL SPECIES NAME COMMON NAME RANK RANK STATUS BRYOPSIDA Callicladium haldanianum Callicladium Moss G5 SNR Leptobryum pyriforme Leptobryum Moss G5 SNR Rhodobryum roseum Rose Moss G5 S1? Trachyxiphium heteroicum Trachyxiphium Moss G2? S1? EQUISETOPSIDA Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail G5 S1S2 FILICOPSIDA Adiantum capillus-veneris Southern Maidenhair-fern G5 S2 Asplenium
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog 2012.Pdf
    TTableable ooff CContentsontents Membership Information 4 Gardening Supplies & More 55 Gift Certificates 8 Order Form 57 Vegetables 5 Seed Collections Artichoke, Arugula 5 Active Dog 40 page 5 Bean 5 Asian Garden 7 Beet 7 Beginning Gardeners 9 Broccoli, Brussels Sprout, Cabbage 8 Carrot 9 Butterfl y Garden 45 Caulifl ower, Celery, Corn 10 Classic Tomato 27 Corn 11 Edible Flowers 49 Cowpea, Cress, Cucumber 12 Healthy Cat 40 Eggplant, Gourds 13 Herbal Pharmacy 34 page 45 Kale, Kohlrabi, Leek 14 Herbal Tea 35 Lettuce 14 Head Lettuce 14 Herbes de Provence 37 Leaf Lettuce 15 Kid’s Collection 30 Romaine Lettuce 15 Kitchen Herb 39 Special Blends 16 Moon Garden 47 Greens & Other Edibles 16 In a Pickle 11 Melons 17 Potpourri 41 page 27 Mustard, Okra 18 Onion, Pea 19 Salad Bar 23 Pepper 20 Salsa 21 Hot 20 Small Spaces 15 Sweet 21 Sprouting Seeds 31 Pumpkin 22 Radish 23 Rhubarb, Solanum, Spinach 24 Catalogs, Mailing Lists and Trademark page 20 Squash 25 If you receive a duplicate catalog, or would prefer to Strawberry, Swiss Chard 26 use our website, please contact us at 888-878-5247. Tomatillo 27 Tomato 27 We do not sell or rent the names and addresses of Currant & Cherry 27 our customers to anyone. Your business with us is Pear & Plum 29 confidential and we respect your privacy. Beefsteak 32 Turnip 33 Typographical Errors page 22 Watermelon 33 Although every precaution is taken to ensure accuracy, errors in price, quantity, and/or Herbs 34 specifications may occur in printing. We reserve the right to correct such errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad Tinker's-Weed & Endangered Species Triosteum Perfoliatum L
    Natural Heritage Broad Tinker's-weed & Endangered Species Triosteum perfoliatum L. Program www.mass.gov/nhesp State Status: Endangered Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife DESCRIPTION: Broad Tinker’s-weed (also known as Wild Coffee or Horse-gentian), a member of the honeysuckle family, is a coarse herb which grows up to 13 dm (4 feet) tall but is usually less than 9 dm (3 feet) in Massachusetts. One to six stout stems grow from a common base. Leaves are obovate or obovate-oblong, 10-22 cm (4-9 in.) long, 4-10 cm (1.5-4 in.) wide, abruptly narrow below the middle, fused around the stem, and usually softly pubescent beneath. Purplish brown or greenish sessile (stalkless) flowers grow in groups of 1 to 4 from each axil. The sepals are 10-18 mm (.25-.75 in.) long, finely and uniformly pubescent on back and margin, and often glandular. The slight fleshy fruit is greenish orange to orange-red and very conspicuous in summer/fall. Holmgren, Noel H. 1998. The Illustrated Companion to Gleason and Cronquist’s Manual. The New York Botanical Garden. SIMILAR SPECIES: Wild Coffee, Triosteum aurantiacum (also called Tinker’s-weed or Horse- gentian), is very similar to Broad Tinker’s-weed, and the connector can be seen around the stem connecting the two have been considered varieties of the same species bases of the leaves. Ordinarily, it prefers more mesic by some authors. However, Wild Coffee is readily (moderately moist) conditions than Broad Tinker’s- separable by its much narrower leaves which are not weed.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Wildflowers
    BLUE / VIOLET (CONTINUED) GLOSSARY (CONTINUED) Lindenwood Wildflowers Phlox (Polemoniaceae) • Corolla : the showy inner floral envelope; the segments (called • Greek Valerian (Polemonium reptans ): similar to Jacob’s-ladder petals) may be separate or joined. The wildflowers listed below are those that are most common and but stem weaker and fewer leaflets; stamens do not project • Disk (in composites): the round or button-like center (like in a daisy) Spring most-likely to be seen by park visitors; all species listed have been beyond flower. Native. April – June composed of numerous tubular disk flowers, usually surrounded by observed at the preserve in the past. Species are arranged by a circle of ray flowers. prominent flower color and then by Family. The months that are listed are the average blooming periods in this region for the flower. Snapdragon (Scrophulariaceae) • Floweret : the individual flowers of a composite/aster flower head. See the glossary for any obscure technical vocabulary included in • Thyme-leaved Speedwell (Veronica serpyllifolia ): creeping with • Head : a crowded cluster of stalk-less, or nearly stalk-less, flowers. the descriptions. A (*) located after the Family name indicates that small, 4-petaled flowers; leaves are small, opposite, toothless, • Leaflets : the smaller, individual parts of a compound leaf. Wildflowers certain general family characteristics were given in a previous color short-stalked and oval. Alien. May – Sept. • Lobed (leaf): Indented, with outer projections rounded. section. Note: edibility is not included; for your own benefit, DO • Native : originally from this area; not introduced. Violet (Violaceae) NOT ATTEMPT TO INGEST ANY WILD PLANT. • Opposite (leaves, etc.): arranged directly across from each other.
    [Show full text]