DOCSLIB.ORG

Oportunidades Hortifruticolas Para

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oportunidades Hortifruticolas Para Frutas y vegetales en fresco permitidos de Colombia a los Estados Unidos Las frutas y vegetales permitidos desde Colombia alcanzan los 74 productos; 20 productos admitidos por Estados Unidos desde todos los países del mundo y 54 productos aprobados específicamente para Colombia. A continuación se enumeran cada uno de los productos con sus respectivos nombres en español, inglés, así como su nombre científico y los puertos por los cuales están permitidos. Lista de frutas y vegetales en fresco aprobados desde todos los países a los Estados 1 Unidos Puertos de Nombre en Español Nombre en Inglés Nombre Científico Entrada Carob, St. John's Todos los 1. Algarrobo Ceratonia siliqua L. Bread Puertos Bulbos de Lirio Todos los 2. Lily bulb Lilium spp. comestible Puertos Trapa natans L. var. Todos los 3. Castaña Singhara nut bispinosa (Roxb.) Makino = Puertos (Trapa bispinosa Roxb.) Castaña de agua Eleocharis dulcis (Burm. f.) Todos los 4. Chinese water chestnut (China) Trin. ex Hensch. Puertos Castaña de agua o Todos los 5. Bat nut or Devil pod Trapa bicornis Osbeck Vaina del diablo Puertos Todos los 6. Castaña de agua Water-chestnut Trapa natans L. Puertos Champiñón de pino japonés, Hongos Tricholoma matsutake (S. Todos los 7. Matsutake Matsutake, seta del Ito & S. Imai) Singer Puertos pino Morchella spp. y géneros Todos los 8. Champiñones Mushroom relacionados de hongos Puertos comestibles Coco , Cocotero, ver Coconut, see Seed Todos los 9. Cocos nucifera L. Manual de Semillas Manual Puertos Todos los 10. Coquito, chufa Cyperus corm Cyperus esculentus L. Puertos Cuiclacoche, 2 Ustilago zeae (Schwein.) Todos los 11. Hutlacoche, carbón Corn smut galls Unger Puertos del maíz 1 Puertos de Nombre en Español Nombre en Inglés Nombre Científico Entrada Dientes de Ajo, Todos los 12. Garlic cloves, peeled Allium sativum L. pelado Puertos Higuera, guira, Todos los 13. higuena, totumo, Cannonball fruit Couroupita guianensis Aubl. Puertos coco de mono Agave atrovirens Karw. ex Todos los 14. Hoja de Maguey Maguey (Leaf ) Salm-Dyck Puertos 3 Todos los 15. Maní, Cacahuetes Arachis hypogaea L. Peanut Puertos Todos los 16. Palmito (pelado) Palm heart (Peeled) Euterpe edulis Mart. Puertos Raíz de Ginger, Todos los 17. Ginger root Zingiber officinale Roscoe Jengibre Puertos Sábila, Zábila (partes Aloe Vera (above Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. = Todos los 18. sobre la superficie) ground parts) Aloe barbadensis Mill. Puertos Todos los 19. Tamarindo en vaina Tamarind bean pod Tamarindus indica L. Puertos Todos los 20. Trufas Truffle Tuber spp. Puertos 1 The United States maintains trade sanctions or embargoes against Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea), Serbia and Montenegro, Sudan, (and Bosnia Serb-controlled Areas of Bosnia-Hercegovina). If an commodity listed here is from one of these countries and is free from pests, then enforce embargoes and trade sanctions under Customs authority. 2 For corn smut galls, see the special procedures for Fresh or Frozen Corn Smut Galls Imported for Consumption. 3 Peanuts are admissible from all countries except PROHIBITED ENTRY from Burkina Faso, China (People's Republic of), Côte d'Ivoire, India, Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Senegal, and Thailand. See the Seed Manual. 2 Lista de frutas y vegetales en fresco aprobados desde Colombia a los Estados Unidos Puertos de Nombre en Español Nombre en Inglés Nombre Científico Entrada Achicoria (toda la Todos los 21. Chicory (whole plant) Cichorium spp. planta) Puertos Albahaca (partes Basil (above ground Ocimum basilicum L. Todos los 22. sobre la superficie) parts) Ocimum spp. Puertos Artichoke, Globe Alcachofa (cabezas Cynara scolymus L. = Todos los 23. (immature flower de flor inmadura) (Cynara cardunculus L.) Puertos heads) Blueberry Todos los 24. Arándanos y Agraz T101-i-1-1 or Vaccinium spp. 2 3 4 5 Puertos T105-d Arracacia xanthorrhiza Atlántico 25. Arracacha (raíz) Peruvian carrot (root) Bancr. Norte Arveja, Alverja, Atlántico 26. Guisante (vaina o Pea (Pod or shelled) Pisum sativum L. Norte descascarado) Banano, Plátano, Todos los 27. Bananitos (hojas, Banana (leaf, fruit) Musa spp. Puertos fruta) Berenjena (sólo Eggplant (commercial Atlantico 28. cargamentos Solanum melongena L. shipments only) Norte comerciales) Todos los 29. Berro Watercress Nasturtium officinale R. Br. Puertos Atlántico Brocoli, Repollitas de Broccoli, Brussels Norte, 30. brusela, Coliflor, sprouts, cauliflower, Brassica oleracea L. Atlántico Sur Repollo cabbage y Golfo Castaña de tierra o Todos los 31. Artichoke, Jerusalem Helianthus tuberosus L. Pataca Puertos Todos los 32. Cebollas, Puerros Onions, Leeks Allium spp. Puertos Todos los 33. Cilantro Cilantro Coriandrum sativum L. Puertos 3 Puertos de Nombre en Español Nombre en Inglés Nombre Científico Entrada Plum 6 Todos los 34. Ciruela T107-a-1 or Prunus domestica L. Puertos 4 5 T105-d Todos los 35. Durian Durian Durio zibethinus L. Puertos Todos los 36. Eneldo (hojas , tallos) Dill (leaf, stem) Anethum graveolens L. Puertos Todos los 37. Espárrago Asparagus Asparagus officinalis L. Puertos Estragón (partes Tarragon (above Todos los 38. Artemisia dracunculus L. sobre la superficie) ground parts) Puertos Atlántico 8 Norte, 39. Frambuesa (fruta) Rubus spp. Raspberry (fruit) Atlántico Sur y Golfo Todos los 40. Fresa Strawberry Fragaria spp. Puertos 1 Fríjol (sólo Bean , garden (Shelled Todos los descascarado) only) Puertos 41. Phaseolus vulgaris L. 1 Fríjol (vaina o Bean , garden (pod or Atlántico descascarado) shelled) Norte 1 Gandul (vaina o Atlántico 42. Pigeon pea (pod or Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. descascarado) shelled) Norte Pomegranate 6 Todos los 43. Granada T107-a-1 or Punica granatum L. Puertos 4 5 T105-d Guisante (vaina Snow pea (flat, Pisum sativum var. Todos los 44. inmadura lisa) immature pod) macrocarpon Ser. Puertos Todos los 45. Laurel (hoja) Bay laurel (leaf) Laurus nobilis L. Puertos Atlántico Norte, 46. Lechuga Lettuce Lactuca sativa L. Atlántico Sur y Golfo Lemon (smooth Todos los 47. Limón (cáscara lisa) Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f. skinned, of commerce) Puertos 4 Puertos de Nombre en Español Nombre en Inglés Nombre Científico Entrada Limón Tahití, Lima Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Todos los 48. Lime, sour (agrio) Swingle Puertos 4 5 Todos los 49. Lulo (fruta) Solanum quitoense Lam. Naranjilla (fruit) Puertos Todos los 50. Maíz, verde Corn, green Zea mays L. Puertos Tangerine 7 Todos los 51. Mandarina T107-a-1 or Citrus reticulata Blanco Puertos 4 5 T105-d Todos los 52. Manzanilla Chamomile Anthemis spp. Puertos Todos los 53. Menta Mint Mentha sp. Puertos Atlántico Okra (pod) Molondrones, Norte Abelmoschus esculentus 54. Quingombo, (L.) Moench Quimbombo (vaina) Okra (pod) Atlántico Sur T101-p-2 y Golfo Atlántico 8 Norte, 55. Mora (fruta) Rubus sp. Blackberry (fruit) Atlántico sur y golfo Yam (tuber), Todos los 56. Ñame (tubérculo) Dioscorea sp. T101-f-3 Puertos Orange, sweet 6 Todos los 57. Naranja, dulce T107-a-1 or Citrus sp. Puertos 4 5 T105-d Todos los 58. Nopal Prickly pear pad Opuntia sp. Puertos Todos los 59. Orégano (hoja , tallo) Oregano (leaf, stem) Origanum spp. Puertos Todos los 60. Perejil (hoja , tallo) Parsley (leaf, stem) Petroselinum hortense auct. Puertos Piña (prohibido Pineapple (prohibited Todos los 61. Ananas comosus (L.) Merr. dentro de Hawai) into Hawaii) Puertos 5 Puertos de Nombre en Español Nombre en Inglés Nombre Científico Entrada Hylocereus megalanthus (K. 7 Schum. ex Vaupel) Ralf Pitahaya amarilla Yellow pitahaya (fruit) , Todos los 62. Bauer = (Selenicereus (fruta) Puertos T106-e megalanthus (K. Schum. ex Vaupel) Moran) Todos los 63. Raíz de loto Lotus root Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Puertos Romero (partes Rosemary (above Todos los 64. Rosmarinus officinalis L. sobre la superficie) ground parts) Puertos Todos los 65. Ruibarbo (tallo) Rhubarb (stalk) Rheum rhabarbarum L. Puertos Todos los 66. Taro Dasheen Alocasia sp. Puertos Tomillo (partes sobre Thyme (above ground Todos los 67. Thymus vulgaris L. la superficie) parts) Puertos Grapefruit 6 Todos los 68. Toronja T107-a-1 or Citrus paradisi Macfad. Puertos 4 5 T105-d Lemon balm (leaf, Todos los 69. Toronjil (hoja, tallo) Melissa officinalis L. stem) Puertos Tuna (fruit), Atlántico 70. Tuna, Higo (fruta) Opuntia spp. T101-d-3 Norte Cape gooseberry (fruit- with or without calyx) Uchuva (fruta con y Todos los 71. 6 Physalis peruviana L. sin cáliz) T107-a or Puertos 4 5 T105-d Grape, 6 Todos los 72. Uva T107-a-1 or Vitis spp. Puertos 4 5 T105-d Todos los 73. Yuca Cassava Manihot esculenta Crantz Puertos Atlántico Norte y 74. Zanahoria (raíz) Carrot (root) Daucus carota L. Pacifico Norte 6 1 If Cydia fabivora, Epinotia aporema, or Maruca testulalis is found, go to page 2-28 for the correct regulatory action to take. 2 If accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate with the additional declaration, "Meets the provisions of 7CFR 319.56-2(j)," then waive treatment. 3 Treated and precleared shipments may enter all ports. Precleared shipments must be accompanied by a PPQ Form 203 signed byt he APHIS inspector on site in Columbia to validate foreign site preclearance. If the shipment is untreated or not precleared, it may enter only at a North American port: Corpus Christi, TX (except untreated products to be irradiated may transit through Dallas/Ft. Worth) and Virginia. 4 Irradiation as an optional treatment (mandatory for naranjilla) is available only after an exporting country has entered into a framework equivalency work plan agreement and met other requirements as specified in 7CFR 305.31. Currently, this country has not entered into a work plan agreement. 5 Fruits irradiated in the country of origin and accompanied by a PPQ Form 203 to confirm irradiation may enter any State. However, untreated fruits and vegetables, intended to be irradiated for quarantine pests, cannot be treated within nor transit through the following States: Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia (except for treatment in Atlanta, GA), Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi (except for treatment in Gulport, MS), Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina (except for treatment in Wilmington, NC), South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas (except untreated products to be irradiated may transit through Dallas/Ft Worth) and Virginia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 422 Part 180—Tolerances and Ex- Emptions for Pesticide
    Pt. 180 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) at any time before the filing of the ini- 180.124 Methyl bromide; tolerances for resi- tial decision. dues. 180.127 Piperonyl butoxide; tolerances for [55 FR 50293, Dec. 5, 1990, as amended at 70 residues. FR 33360, June 8, 2005] 180.128 Pyrethrins; tolerances for residues. 180.129 o-Phenylphenol and its sodium salt; PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EX- tolerances for residues. 180.130 Hydrogen Cyanide; tolerances for EMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEM- residues. ICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 180.132 Thiram; tolerances for residues. 180.142 2,4-D; tolerances for residues. Subpart A—Definitions and Interpretative 180.145 Fluorine compounds; tolerances for Regulations residues. 180.151 Ethylene oxide; tolerances for resi- Sec. dues. 180.1 Definitions and interpretations. 180.153 Diazinon; tolerances for residues. 180.3 Tolerances for related pesticide chemi- 180.154 Azinphos-methyl; tolerances for resi- cals. dues. 180.4 Exceptions. 180.155 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; tolerances 180.5 Zero tolerances. for residues. 180.6 Pesticide tolerances regarding milk, 180.163 Dicofol; tolerances for residues. eggs, meat, and/or poultry; statement of 180.169 Carbaryl; tolerances for residues. policy. 180.172 Dodine; tolerances for residues. 180.175 Maleic hydrazide; tolerances for resi- Subpart B—Procedural Regulations dues. 180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for residues. 180.7 Petitions proposing tolerances or ex- 180.178 Ethoxyquin; tolerances for residues. emptions for pesticide residues in or on 180.181 Chlorpropham; tolerances for resi- raw agricultural commodities or proc- dues. essed foods. 180.182 Endosulfan; tolerances for residues. 180.8 Withdrawal of petitions without preju- 180.183 Disulfoton; tolerances for residues.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case for the Commercial Harvest of Wild Edible Fungi in Northwestern Ontario
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Undergraduate theses 2020 A case for the commercial harvest of wild edible fungi in Northwestern Ontario Campbell, Osa http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4676 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons A CASE FOR THE COMMERCIAL HARVEST OF WILD EDIBLE FUNGI IN NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO by Osa Campbell FACULTY OF NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO May 2020 i A CASE FOR THE COMMERCIAL HARVEST OF WILD EDIBLE FUNGI IN NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO by Osa Campbell An Undergraduate Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Honours Bachelor of Environmental Management Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University 2020 ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------- Dr. Leonard Hutchison Dr. Lada Malek Major Advisor Second Reader ii LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the HBEM degree at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, I agree that the University will make it freely available for inspection. This thesis is made available by my authority solely for the purpose of private study and may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part (except as permitted by the Copyright Laws) without my written authority. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________ iii A CAUTION TO THE READER This HBEM thesis has been through a semi-formal process of review and comment by at least two faculty members. It is made available for loan by the Faculty of Natural Resources Management for the purpose of advancing the practice of professional and scientific forestry. The reader should be aware that opinions and conclusions expressed in this document ae those of the student and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the thesis supervisor, the faculty or of Lakehead University.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter Edition 2003
    Edition 2003 WELCOME to Ethnobotanical Leaflets. Here you will find links to various ethnobotanical projects and organizations around the world. Take time and enjoy our Web Journal. As always, manuscript contributions from our readers are welcome. -- Web Journal -- Ethnobotanical Studies Of Chandigarh Region by Amrit Pal Singh A Potential Anticancer Withanolide from Withania somnifera (L.) Dun. by Amrit Pal Singh Hepatotprotective Natural Products by Samir Malhotra and Amrit Pal Singh Glycyrrhizin-A Review by Amrit Pal Singh Studies on collection and marketing of Morchella (Morels) of Utror-Gabral Valleys, District Swat, Pakistan by Muhammad Hamayun and Mir Ajab Khan Ethnobotanical Resources of Manikhel Forests, Orakzai Tirah, Pakistan by Habib Ahmad, Samiullah Khan, Ahmad Khan and Muhammad Hamayun Salicin - A Natural Analgesic by Amrit P. Singh Distribution of Steroid-like Compounds in Plant Flora by Amrit P. Singh and A.S. Sandhu Potential and Market Status of Mushrooms as Non-Timber Forest Products in Pakistan by Abdul Latif , Zabta Khan Shinwari and Shaheen Begum Hypericin - A Napthodianthrone from Hypericum perforatum by Dr Amrit Pal Singh, MD Ethnobotanical Studies of some Useful Shrubs and Trees of District Buner, NWFP, Pakistan, by Muhammad Hamayun Marketing of medicinal plants of Utror-Gabral Valleys, Swat, Pakistan, by Muhammad Hamayun, Mir Ajab Khan and Shaheen Begum Common medicinal folk recipes of District Buner, NWFP, Pakistan, by Muhammad Hamayun, Ambara Khan and Mir Ajab Khan The Role of Natural Products in Pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer’s Disease, by Dr. Amrit Pal Singh, MD Pharmacological considerations of Tylophora asthmatica, by Dr. Amrit Pal Singh, MD Barley; The Versatile Crop, by Brian Young The Brazil Nut (Bertholletia excelsa), by Tim Hennessey Ephedra (Ma Huang), by Erica McBroom Ephedra: Asking for Trouble?, by Scot Peterson Ginkgo biloba, by Kelly Westall Cyperus papyrus: From the Nile to Modern Times, by Matt Burmeister The Miraculous Reishii: Mushroom or Medicine?, by Dylan Kosmar St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of the Yellow Morel from Israel Segula Masaphy,* Limor Zabari, Doron Goldberg, and Gurinaz Jander-Shagug
    The Complexity of Morchella Systematics: A Case of the Yellow Morel from Israel Segula Masaphy,* Limor Zabari, Doron Goldberg, and Gurinaz Jander-Shagug A B C Abstract Individual morel mushrooms are highly polymorphic, resulting in confusion in their taxonomic distinction. In particu- lar, yellow morels from northern Israel, which are presumably Morchella esculenta, differ greatly in head color, head shape, ridge arrangement, and stalk-to-head ratio. Five morphologically distinct yellow morel fruiting bodies were genetically character- ized. Their internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region within the nuclear ribosomal DNA and partial LSU (28S) gene were se- quenced and analyzed. All of the analyzed morphotypes showed identical genotypes in both sequences. A phylogenetic tree with retrieved NCBI GenBank sequences showed better fit of the ITS sequences to D E M. crassipes than M. esculenta but with less than 85% homology, while LSU sequences, Figure 1. Fruiting body morphotypes examined in this study. (A) MS1-32, (B) MS1-34, showed more then 98.8% homology with (C) MS1-52, (D) MS1-106, (E) MS1-113. Fruiting bodies were similar in height, approxi- both species, giving no previously defined mately 6-8 cm. species definition according the two se- quences. Keywords: ITS region, Morchella esculenta, 14 FUNGI Volume 3:2 Spring 2010 MorchellaFUNGI crassipes Volume, phenotypic 3:2 Spring variation. 2010 FUNGI Volume 3:2 Spring 2010 15 Introduction Materials and Methods Morchella sp. fruiting bodies (morels) are highly polymorphic. Fruiting bodies: Fruiting bodies used in this study were collected Although morphology is still the primary means of identifying from the Galilee region in Israel in the 2003-2007 seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Mushroom Highlights Newsletter
    April 2016 - Mushroom Highlights Newsletter for Wild Mushrooms PNW ❖ www.wildmushroomspnw.com Can Fungi Survive on Mars? An experiment conducted on the international space station found that even after 18 months on board, more than 60% of the fungi’s cells remained intact. The samples used were from the genus Cryomyces and came from remote and hostile areas on the Earth to see if they could also survive extreme environments beyond our planet, and they did. (from earthsky.org) Fungi Create Raindrops Mushroom spores are released into the atmosphere every day by the billions. This amounts to 50 million tons each year. Together with pollen, bacteria, and other biological particles, they serve as nuclei for cloud formation, and therefore rain. (extracted from NAMA March/April 2016 – Elio Schaechter) How Fast and How Far Can a Spore Fly? On the underside of some mushroom caps there are gills or pores. Because of internal pressure from maturing spores and humidity, the contents of asci (tubes where spores are formed) can simultaneously eject spores into the air with an initial velocity of close to 7 feet/second. This is sustained only for a brief time or the spores would hit the opposite gills. Since they cannot overcome the viscosity of air, they drop vertically to be caught by air current and may be carried a long distance. Sphaerobolus stellatus (Cannonball Fungus) can travel over a 20 foot horizontal and a 7 foot vertical distance. (extracted from NAMA March/April 2016 – Elio Schaechter) When is a Mushroom Important? You found a mushroom and just can’t identify it.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Three New Species of Cantharellus Within 20 M of One Another in Western Wisconsin, USA
    Mycologia, 105(2), 2013, pp. 447–461. DOI: 10.3852/12-181 # 2013 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal three new species of Cantharellus within 20 m of one another in western Wisconsin, USA Matthew J. Foltz morphological and DNA data have shown that C. Kathryn E. Perez1 cibarius in the United States is a species complex that Thomas J. Volk requires further taxonomic attention (Feibelman et Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin-La al. 1994, Dunham et al. 2003, Moncalvo et al. 2006, Crosse, 1725 State Street, La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601 Arora and Dunham 2008, Buyck and Hofstetter 2011). In this study we continue efforts to document North American Cantharellus diversity. Abstract: Three new species, Cantharellus phasmatis, In the past 50 years, several advancements in Cantharellus flavus and Cantharellus spectaculus, all taxonomy of Cantharellus have been made from previously considered Cantharellus cibarius, are de- morphological data. Smith (1968) described C. scribed in this study. The circumscription of these cibarius var. cibarius from Michigan, which he three species from C. cibarius and other Cantharellus believed to be the same as C. cibarius from Europe. species is supported by morphological differences Some of the key diagnostic features from this and nuclear DNA sequence data (nLSU, ITS, TEF1). description are the ‘‘egg-yellow or paler’’ hymenium, All were found under Quercus spp. in a small plot in the ‘‘pale-ochraceous’’ spore print and the incurved- Hixon Forest Park in La Crosse, Wisconsin, empha- margin becoming plane-to-wavy and finally broadly sizing the need for further taxonomic study of even infundibuliform.
    [Show full text]
  • Morchella Esculenta</Em>
    Journal of Bioresource Management Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 6 In Vitro Propagation of Morchella esculenta and Study of its Life Cycle Nazish Kanwal Institute of Natural and Management Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan Kainaat William Bioresource Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan Kishwar Sultana Institute of Natural and Management Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/jbm Part of the Biodiversity Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kanwal, N., William, K., & Sultana, K. (2016). In Vitro Propagation of Morchella esculenta and Study of its Life Cycle, Journal of Bioresource Management, 3 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35691/JBM.6102.0044 ISSN: 2309-3854 online This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Bioresource Management by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In Vitro Propagation of Morchella esculenta and Study of its Life Cycle © Copyrights of all the papers published in Journal of Bioresource Management are with its publisher, Center for Bioresource Research (CBR) Islamabad, Pakistan. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes provided the original work and source is appropriately cited. Journal of Bioresource Management does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Journal of Bioresource Management’s prior written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Product Governance: Finding Policies That Work for Non-Timber Forest Products/Edited by Sarah A
    People and Plants International People and Plants International CONSERVAT I O N S E R I ES Governance Wild Product CONSERVAT I O N S E R I ES ‘This timely book does a terrific job of providing a image © Nigel Dickinson / Still Pictures Cover context for improving policies related to the harvest and trade of wild resources. What are the major issues, what works, what clearly doesn’t work, and what are the best alternatives? There is a lot to absorb – and hopefully apply – here. The editors are to be congratulated for assembling such a thoughtful and informative collection of papers.’ Charles M. Peters, Kate E. Tode Curator Wild Product of Botany, The New York Botanical Garden ‘It is high time to move from anecdotes and eclectic studies on NTFPs to democratic and sustainable plans that foster diverse livelihoods and new relationships to nature. Governance In an exciting work of truly global scope – drawing on experiences from Mexico to India – Laird, McLain and Wynberg have done just that, assembling readable and cutting-edge proposals, which link grounded cases with general principles to fundamentally rethink the rules that govern forests around the world.’ Finding Policies that Work for Paul Robbins, Professor and Head, School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona, USA Non-Timber Forest Products roducts from the wild, also known as non-timber forest products (NTFPs), are used as medicines, foods, spices and for a multitude of other purposes. They contribute Psubstantially to rural livelihoods, generate revenue for companies and governments, and have a range of impacts on biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialty Wood Products
    Chapter 8: Specialty Wood Products Specialty wood products were chosen for this research for several reasons. One, they are traditional to central Appalachia and popular with many people in southwest Virginia. Two, products are commonly manufactured and seen for sale in the region. Three, market players were easily accessible for interviews because they appreciate and welcome attention paid to their activity. Conversely, market players of medicinal and herbal NTFPS are more secretive about disclosing their activities. Market players interviewed were producers, musicians, and music store owners in southwest Virginia. Specialty wood products include furniture, carvings, musical instruments, bowls, walking sticks, and crafts. These products may not be considered actual NTFPs because of their timber origin. However, they can be considered a special forest product (SFP), a category which includes NTFPs and timber products other than those used for construction (Mater 1993). Specialty wood products are included in this research not as an NTFP but as a SFP which has similar affects on local people as other legitimate NTFPs, such as craft products and medicinal/herbal products. Research results for marketing systems of specialty wood products are presented and discussed in the same manner as NTFP crafts, and medicinal and herbal NTFPs. The research shows that specialty wood products in southwest Virginia are made from decorative woods such as paper and yellow birch, aspen, cottonwood, basswood, poplar, oak, walnut, maple, ash, cherry, plum, apple, cedar, spruce, elm, butternut, diamond willow, and sumac. Research results for one group of specialty wood product, musical instruments, are described and discussed here. Musical instruments were selected as an important specialty wood product because of their popularity and availability of 72 information.
    [Show full text]
  • China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides In
    GB 2763-2016 THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 3/31/2017 GAIN Report Number: CH17016 China - Peoples Republic of Post: Beijing China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food Report Categories: FAIRS Subject Report Approved By: Lisa Anderson Prepared By: FAS Staff Report Highlights: On December 18, 2016, the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission, Ministry of Agriculture, China Food and Drug Administration released the National Food Safety Standard - Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Foods (GB 2763-2016). The standard will replace the current MRL Standard (GB 2763-2014) and will be implemented on June 18, 2017. This report provides an unofficial translation of the standard. Editors’ Note: The asterisk appearing in the MRL column means that the limit is a temporary MRL. A temporary MRL is usually set under the following four conditions: 1. The dietary risk assessment data is incomplete; 2. The Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is temporary (ADI is used as the basis for MRL setting); 3. There is no surveillance or analysis method for the MRL that complies with the standard requirements; 4. In emergency situations, the pesticide is approved to be used on un-registered crops. I GB 2763-2016 General Information: BEGIN TRANSLATION ICS 65.100 G 25 GB National Standard of the People’s Republic of China GB 2763—2016 Replacing GB 2763 - 2014 National food safety standard Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food General Information: National Health and Family Planning Commission Issued by: Ministry of Agriculture China Food and Drug Administration Issued on: 2016-12-18 Implementation:2017-06-18 II GB 2763-2016 Table of Content Preface ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Morels (Morchella Spp.)
    Natural Product Radiance, Vol. 5(4), 2006, pp. 306-310 Green page: Article Morels (Morchella spp.) in Kumaun Himalaya Chandra Singh Negi Department of Zoology Government Post Graduate College, Pithoragarh Uttaranchal-262 502, India E-mail: [email protected]. Received 9 December 2004; Accepted 28 March 2006 2 Abstract delectable of mushrooms . Occurrence of 18 species of Morchella are reported Morels, also known as sponge mushrooms, belong to the genus Morchella Dill. The from 28 countries, wherein altogether 14 present paper deals with the most commonly exploited species of this genus in the Darma valley, species are reported to be edible or used district Pithoragarh, Kumaun Himalaya with an aim to improve upon the knowledge base about as food, and 5 are used medicinally3. They these macrofungi for further exploration. are highly prized for their culinary uses, Keywords: Morels, Morchella spp., Kumaun Himalaya, Edible fungi, Medicinal fungi, Sponge particularly as a gourmet food and are Mushrooms. used in gravies, sauces and soups. Morels 7 IPC code; Int. cl. — A01G 1/04, A61K 35/84, A23L 1/00 are not only delicious; they are also healthy and nutritious food. They contain Introduction symbiotic relationships (mycorrhizas) 42 percent protein on a dry weight basis, with trees, which enable them to grow in are low in calories and rich in minerals4. Wild edible fungi have been nutrient deficient soils. Needless to say This apart, its metabolites have varied collected and consumed by people for health of the forest wherein these species uses, viz. as adaptogens and thousands of years. The archaeological of wild fungi grow is inadvertently related immunostimulants and are considered to record reveals edible species associated to the health of the forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Edible Mushrooms from High Elevations in the Garhwal Himalaya-I
    Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 6 (2): 118–131(2016) ISSN 2229-2225 www.creamjournal.org Article CREAM Copyright © 2016 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/cream/6/2/6 Wild edible mushrooms from high elevations in the Garhwal Himalaya-I Bhatt RP1, Singh U1* and Stephenson SL2 1Department of Botany & Microbiology, H.N.B. Garhwal University (A Central University), Srinagar, Garhwal, 246174, Uttarakhand, India 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 7270, USA Bhatt RP, Singh U, Stephenson SL. 2016 – Wild edible mushrooms from high elevations in the Garhwal Himalaya-I. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 6(1), 118–131, Doi 10.5943/cream/6/2/6 Abstract Information is provided on 15 species of wild edible mushrooms collected at elevations of 2000−3500 masl in the Garhwal Himalaya of Northern India. Except for Morchella esculenta (‗Guchhi‘), which is a member of the ascomycetes, all of the other macrofungi considered herein are basidiomycetes. The 15 species belong to 12 genera and 08 families and were collected from 08 different study sites in the Garhwal Himalaya. Key words – Ascomycetes – Basidiomycetes – macrofungi − Northern India Introduction Wild mushrooms have been eaten by mankind since time immemorial. Their use in Indian literature dates back to 3000 B.C. They were highly prized by the Greeks, and the consumption of mushrooms in European nations has deep traditional roots. Edible mushrooms are considered one of the world‘s greatest natural resources since they have the ability to transform nutritionally valueless substances into high protein foods. Mushrooms are highly valued for their rich characteristic flavour, delicate taste and potent nutritional properties.
    [Show full text]