DOCSLIB.ORG

JOURNAL of PLANT PATHOLOGY VOLUME 96 (1, SUPPLEMENT) MAY 2014 ) Able) GFLV

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JOURNAL of PLANT PATHOLOGY VOLUME 96 (1, SUPPLEMENT) MAY 2014 ) Able) GFLV S001-S136 INDEX Volume 96 (1, Supplement) May 2014 S1 Introduction Journal S5 Next generation sequencing S7 Grapevine-infecting viruses (Table) of Plant Pathology S9 Infectious degeneration (GFLV) Formerly Rivista di patologia vegetale established in 1892 S29 Infectious degeneration (European Nepoviruses) JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY OF JOURNAL S43 Grapevine degeneration and decline S49 Grapevine leafroll S71 Rugose wood complex S89 Graft incompatibility DIRECTORY OF VIRUS AND S95 Fleck complex VIRUS-LIKE S103 Minor viruses and virus diseases DISEASES OF THE GRAPEVINE S121 Virus-like diseases S129 Viroids AND THEIR AGENTS G.P. Martelli Università Aldo Moro. VOLUME 96 (1, SUPPLEMENT) MAY 2014 SUPPLEMENT) MAY (1, 96 VOLUME Bari, Italy SIPaV ONLINE http://www.sipav.org Visit our World Wide Web site: you will find information about the Society, the Journal of Plant Pathology (including full Invited Reviews and abstracts of accepted papers) and interesting phytopathological links. An International Journal of the Italian Society for Plant Pathology EDIZIONI ETS, Pisa, Italy ISSN 1125-4653 Poste Italiane S.p.A. - Spedizione in Abbonamento Postale - D.L. 353/2003 (conv. in L. 27/02/2004 n° 46) art. 1, comma 1 - DCB AREA CENTRO 1/Pisa. JPP 96 (1s) 2014 COVER.indd 1 14/05/14 16:12 JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY Formerly RIVISTA DI PATOLOGIA VEGETALE Editor-in-Chief G.P. Martelli Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta e degli Alimenti Via G. Amendola, 165/A - 70126 Bari, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Senior Editors P. Alghisi Q. Migheli J.D. Janse A. Hadidi Dipartimento del Territorio Dipartimento di Protezione Dutch General Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture e Sistemi Agroforestali delle Piante Department of Laboratory Methods Agricultural Research Service Strada Romea 16 - Agripolis Via E. De Nicola and Diagnostics P.O. Box 1115, 8300 Beltsville, MD 20705 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy 07100 Sassari, Italy BC Emmeloord, The Netherlands USA E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] M. Fuchs G. Firrao A. Caesar T. Candresse Cornell University Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie USDA-ARS-NPARL Equipe de Virologie Department of Plant Pathology ed Ambientali P.O. Box 463 UMR GD2P, IBVM New York State Agricultural Università di Udine Sidney MT 59270 INRA BP 81 Experiment Station via Scienze 208 USA 33883 Villenave d’Ornon Cedex Geneva NY 14456-0462 USA 33100 Udine, Italy E-mail: [email protected] France E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] M. Garbelotto U.C. Berkeley Forest Pathology and Mycology Laboratory Department of ESPM Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA Associate Editors I.S. Ben Ze’ev, Bet Dagan, Israel K. Geider, Ladenburg, Germany M. Pasquali, Luxembourg L. Blackman, Camberra, Australia P. Gonthier, Torino, Italy D. Prusky, Bet-Dagan, Israel F. Cardinale, Torino, Italy J. Hammond, Beltsville, USA J. Pulawska, Skierniewice, Poland W. Chen, Pullman, USA T. Jung, Brannenburg, Germany M. Reverberi, Roma, Italy T. Coram, Indianapolis, USA N. Katis, Thessaloniki, Greece V. Rossi, Piacenza, Italy P.W. Crous, Utrecht, The Netherlands M.S. Kim, Moscow, USA S. Sabanadzovic, Mississippi State, USA H. Czosnek, Rehovot, Israel R.R. Martin, Corvallis, USA A. Scala, Florence, Italy R. D’Ovidio, Viterbo, Italy C. Marzachì, Torino, Italy D. Skoric, Zagreb, Croatia R. Flores, Valencia, Spain C. Neema, Paris, France M. Scortichini, Roma, Italy F.M. Gabler, Parlier, USA E. Noris, Torino, Italy G.E. Vallad, Wimauma, USA Managing Editor L. Rubino, Bari, Italy Editorial Office Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta e degli Alimenti, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy Tel. +39.080.5442914 – Fax: +39.080.5442911 – e-mail: [email protected] Journal of Plant Pathology (JPP) is the international continuation of the Rivista di Patologia Vegetale. It publishes original research papers, short communications, disease notes, and invited reviews on fundamental and applied aspects of plant pathology. Manuscripts, written in English, must be submitted to the journal web site (www.sipav.org/jpp). All contributions will undergo peer reviewing. Authors are invited to follow the instructions for the preparation of manuscripts. The Journal of Plant Pathology does not have page charge. JPP is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information and is covered also by SciSearch®, ISI Alerting Services, Current Contents®/ Agriculture, Biology, Environmental Sciences, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Tobacco Abstracts, Abstracts Journal, and Pest Directory. The Italian Society for Plant Pathology (SIPaV) promotes research in all fields of plant pathology. JPP is the international journal of the Society which is responsible for the editorial policy. Webpage: www.sipav.org/main/jpp Annual subscription prices (2013) Europe (Euro zone) Other countries Personal: Print € 150.00 € 200.00 Personal: Online € 120.00 € 120.00 Institutional: Print € 150.00 € 200.00 Institutional: Print + Online € 400.00 € 450.00 Institutional: Online € 300.00 € 300.00 Subscriptions: www.sipav.org/main/jpp Edizioni ETS, Piazza Carrara 16-19, 56126 Pisa, Italy. Fax: +39.050.20158, Tel.: +39.050.29544 - +39.050.503868 - www.edizioniets.com Iscritto al Reg. della stampa presso la Canc. del Trib. di Pisa n° 3/97 del 01.02.1997. Responsabile: Alessandra Borghini. Quadrimestrale. Contiene meno del 70% di pubblicità. Spedizione in Abbonamento Postale - D.L. 353/2003 (conv. in L. 27/02/2004 n° 46) art. 1, comma 1 - DCB AREA CENTRO 1/Pisa. Finito di stampare nel mese di ottobre 2013 in Pisa dalle EDIZIONI ETS. JPP 96 (1s) 2014 COVER.indd 2 14/05/14 16:12 Journal of Plant Pathology (2014), 96 (1S), 1-4 Edizioni ETS Pisa, 2014 1 INTRODUCTION The grapevine (Vitis spp.) undoubtedly represents one R., Gugerli P., 2003. A short history of ICVG. Extended of the woody crops most widely grown in temperate cli- Abstracts 14th Meeting of ICVG, Locorotondo, Italy: 1-2). mates, and a highly valuable agricultural commodity. As Since its foundation, ICVG has met at: most of the vegetatively propagated crops, grapevines are 1. Changins (Switzerland), 17-20 August 1964 exposed to the attacks of a variety of pests and patho- gens among which infectious intracellular agents (viruses, 2. Davis (California, USA), 7-11 September 1965 viroids, phloem- and xylem-limited prokaryotes) play a 3. Bernkastel-Kues (West Germany), September 1967 major role, causing heavy losses, shortening the produc- 4. Colmar (France), 16-18 June 1970 tive life of vineyars, and endangering the survival itself of 5. Salice Terme (Italy), 16-19 September 1973 affected vines. The importance of the grapevine industry and the magnitude of the problems caused by these patho- 6. Cordoba and Madrid (Spain), 12-17 September 1976 gens has generated wide interest which, in turn, has fos- 7. Niagara Falls (Ontario, Canada), 7-12 September 1980 tered intensive research which has been especially active 8. Bari (Italy), 2-7 September 1984 at the international scale from the late 1950’s onwards. The increased attention paid to grapevine's virological prob- 9. Kiryat Anavim (Israel), 6-11 September 1987 lems and the like has produced an impressive series of pa- 10. Volos (Greece), 3-7 September 1990 pers which now number over 5,000. The papers up to 2003 11. Montreux (Switzerland), 5-10 September 1993 are listed and commented in six bibliographic reports: 12. Lisbon (Portugal), 28 September - 2 October 1997 – Caudwell A., 1965. Bibliographie des viroses de la vigne 13. Adelaide (South Australia), 12-17 March 2000 des origines à 1965. Office International de la Vigne et du Vin, Paris, 76 pp.; 14. Locorotondo (Italy), 12-17 September 2003 – Caudwell A., Hewitt W.B., Bovey R., 1972. Les virus de 15. Stellenbosch (South Africa), 3-7 April 2006 la vigne. Bibliographie de 1965-1970. Vitis 11: 303-324; 16. Dijon (France), 31 August - 4 September 2009 – Hewitt W.B., Bovey R., 1979. The viroses and virus-like 17. Davis (California, USA), 7-14 October 2012 diseases of the grapevine. A bibliographic report 18. Ankara (Turkey), scheduled for 7-11 September 2015 1971-1978. Vitis 18: 316-376; From the very beginning, ICVG has been instrumental – Bovey R., Martelli G.P., 1986. The viroses and virus-like in fostering basic and applied research in grapevine virol- diseases of the grapevine. A bibliographic report ogy, attracting the attention of scientists, growers, nursery- 1979-1984. Vitis 25: 227-275; men and administrators on the detrimental effects of infec- – Bovey R., 1999. The viroses and virus-like diseases of tious diseases on the well-being of the industry, and sup- the grapevine: bibliographic report 1985-1997. Options porting initiatives for the establishment and implementa- Méditerranéenes 29 (Series B, 3rd part): 8-172; tion of clean stock programmes and certification schemes. – Bovey R., 2006. The viroses and virus-like diseases of To this effect, among other things, ICVG has issued the the grapevine. A bibliographic report 1997-2003. Op- recommendations that follow: tions Méditerranéennes 29 (Series B, 3rd part): 7-172. The International Council for the Study of Viruses and Virus which have been compiled under the auspices of the In- Diseases of the Grapevine (ICVG), recognizes that a number of ternational Council for the Study of Viruses and Virus the 60 or so infectious agents (viruses, viroids, and phytoplas- Diseases of the Grapevine (ICVG). mas) recorded from the grapevine can be highly detrimental to this crop, having a negative impact on the plant vigour and ICVG was established in 1962 by a group of Ameri- longevity, as well as on the quality and quantity of the yield. can and European plant pathologists who realized the Infected propagating material is largely responsible for the importance of creating an international organization for spread of diseases among and within viticultural countries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grapevine Virus Diseases: Economic Impact and Current Advances in Viral Prospection and Management1
    1/22 ISSN 0100-2945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452017411 GRAPEVINE VIRUS DISEASES: ECONOMIC IMPACT AND CURRENT ADVANCES IN VIRAL PROSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT1 MARCOS FERNANDO BASSO2, THOR VINÍCIUS MArtins FAJARDO3, PASQUALE SALDARELLI4 ABSTRACT-Grapevine (Vitis spp.) is a major vegetative propagated fruit crop with high socioeconomic importance worldwide. It is susceptible to several graft-transmitted agents that cause several diseases and substantial crop losses, reducing fruit quality and plant vigor, and shorten the longevity of vines. The vegetative propagation and frequent exchanges of propagative material among countries contribute to spread these pathogens, favoring the emergence of complex diseases. Its perennial life cycle further accelerates the mixing and introduction of several viral agents into a single plant. Currently, approximately 65 viruses belonging to different families have been reported infecting grapevines, but not all cause economically relevant diseases. The grapevine leafroll, rugose wood complex, leaf degeneration and fleck diseases are the four main disorders having worldwide economic importance. In addition, new viral species and strains have been identified and associated with economically important constraints to grape production. In Brazilian vineyards, eighteen viruses, three viroids and two virus-like diseases had already their occurrence reported and were molecularly characterized. Here, we review the current knowledge of these viruses, report advances in their diagnosis and prospection of new species, and give indications about the management of the associated grapevine diseases. Index terms: Vegetative propagation, plant viruses, crop losses, berry quality, next-generation sequencing. VIROSES EM VIDEIRAS: IMPACTO ECONÔMICO E RECENTES AVANÇOS NA PROSPECÇÃO DE VÍRUS E MANEJO DAS DOENÇAS DE ORIGEM VIRAL RESUMO-A videira (Vitis spp.) é propagada vegetativamente e considerada uma das principais culturas frutíferas por sua importância socioeconômica mundial.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Comparisons Between Xiphinema Rivesi Dalmasso and X
    Dolichodorus grandaspicatus n. sp.: Robbins 511 scription and SEM observations of Dolichodorus 10:28-34. marylandicus n. sp. with a key to species of 4. Sher, S. A., and A. H. Bell. 1975. Scanning Dolichodorus. J. Nematol. 13:128-135. electron micrographs of the anterior region of 3. Robbins, R. T. 1978. Descriptions of females some species of Tylenchoidea (Tylenchida: Nema- (emended), a male, and juveniles of Paralongidorus toda). J. Nematol. 7:69-83. microlaimus (Nematoda: Longidoridae) J. Nematol. Morphological Comparisons Between Xiphinema rivesi Dalmasso and X. americanum Cobb Populations from the Eastern United States' .X'|AREK 1"~. ~¥OJTOWICZ'-', A. MORGAN GOLDEN :~, L. B. FORER 4, AND R. F. STOUFFER r' Ab.~tract: Tltough in the past Xiphinema americanum has been the most commonly reported dagger nematode in the eastern United States, our studies revealed the presence in l'ennsvlvania of a previously tntrecognized and unreported species related to X. americanum, Morphometric data atul photomicrographs establish the identity of this form as X. rivesi and show expected variations in populations of this species from various locations. Similar data and illustrations are given for X. americam~m populations from Pennsylvania and other areas, showing variations attd relationships. Xiphinema rivesi is widely distributed in the fruit producing area of south- cctttral l'cttnsylvania atttl is also reported herein from raspherry in Vermont and apple in Maryland attd New York. This species is frequently found it, fruit growing areas of Pennsylvania associated with lomatn r'ngspot virus-induced diseases and is also found associated with corn, bluegrass sod, and alfalfa. Key words: Xiphinema amerieanum, X.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic of Grapevine Fanleaf Virus (GFLV) on Durres District, Albania
    Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST) ISSN: 2458-9403 Vol. 6 Issue 3, March - 2019 Diagnostic of Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) on Durres district, Albania Dhurata Shehu, Dritan Sadikaj, Thanas Ruci Agriculture University of Tirana Faculty of Agriculture and the Environment Plant Protection Department Abstract—Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) is the yellowing. The slabs have the closest nodes and have viral disease of the most known and widespread rickety growth. Production and quality of grapes are in the world. Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) is a always on the decrease. Healing from this virus of plant pathogenic virus of the family Secoviridae. It these vines is almost impossible, in addition to helping infects grapevines, causing chlorosis of the for a better growth through abundant fertilizers, scarce leaves and lowering the fruit quality. The study soil work, good protection from parasites [1]. The virus was conducted during 2018 in some areas of the has many stems and causes various symptoms with Durres district, in the Rrashbull, Synej, Arapaj, high intensity [5]. Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) is a Ramanat area. The cultivares taken in the study plant pathogenic virus of the family Secoviridae. It are: Cardinal, Sheshi i bardhe, Shesh i zi, Moscato infects grapevines, causing chlorosis of the leaves D’ Amburgo, Regina, Tajke e kuqe, Merlot, and lowering the fruit quality. Because of its effect on Trebbiano toskano, Italia, Afuzali, Perlet which are grape yield, GFLV is a pathogen of commercial widespread in this area. The samples were importance. It is transmitted via a nematode vector, brought to the lab and tested with the Das Elisa Xiphinema index.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribosomal and Mitochondrial DNA Analyses of Xiphinema Americanum-Group Populations Stela S
    Journal of Nematology 38(4):404–410. 2006. © The Society of Nematologists 2006. Ribosomal and Mitochondrial DNA Analyses of Xiphinema americanum-Group Populations Stela S. Lazarova,1 Gaynor Malloch,2 Claudio M.G. Oliveira,3 Judith Hübschen,4 Roy Neilson2 Abstract: The 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and cytochrome oxidase I region of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) were sequenced for 24 Xiphinema americanum-group populations sourced from a number of geographically disparate locations. Sequences were sub- jected to phylogenetic analysis and compared. 18S rDNA strongly suggested that only X. pachtaicum, X. simile (two populations) and a X. americanum s.l. population from Portugal were different from the other 20 populations studied, whereas mtDNA indicated some heterogeneity between populations. Phylogenetically, based on mtDNA, an apparent dichotomy existed amongst X. americanum- group populations from North America and those from Asia, South America and Oceania. Analyses of 18S rDNA and mtDNA sequences underpin the classical taxonomic issues of the X. americanum-group and cast doubt on the degree of speciation within the X. americanum-group. Key words: 18S rDNA, longidorid, Longidoridae, molecular analysis, mtDNA, nematode, taxonomy. The taxonomy of the Xiphinema americanum-group is and Japan being of particular economic importance, as controversial, comprising either 34 (Luc et al., 1998), they are natural virus-vectors of four members of the 38 (Coomans et al., 2001) or 50 (Barsi and Lamberti, genus Nepovirus (Taylor and Brown, 1997). Biologically, 2004; Lamberti et al., 2004) putative species, depend- some species reported from Africa, Europe and the US ing on the taxonomic authority. For example, Luc et al. have been shown to have only three and not the usual (1998) proposed that X.
    [Show full text]
  • Grapevine Fanleaf Virus: Biology, Biotechnology and Resistance
    GRAPEVINE FANLEAF VIRUS: BIOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND RESISTANCE A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by John Wesley Gottula May 2014 © 2014 John Wesley Gottula GRAPEVINE FANLEAF VIRUS: BIOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND RESISTANCE John Wesley Gottula, Ph. D. Cornell University 2014 Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) causes fanleaf degeneration of grapevines. GFLV is present in most grape growing regions and has a bipartite RNA genome. The three goals of this research were to (1) advance our understanding of GFLV biology through studies on its satellite RNA, (2) engineer GFLV into a viral vector for grapevine functional genomics, and (3) discover a source of resistance to GFLV. This author addressed GFLV biology by studying the least understood aspect of GFLV: its satellite RNA. This author sequenced a new GFLV satellite RNA variant and compared it with other satellite RNA sequences. Forensic tracking of the satellite RNA revealed that it originated from an ancestral nepovirus and was likely introduced from Europe into North America. Greenhouse experiments showed that the GFLV satellite RNA has commensal relationship with its helper virus on a herbaceous host. This author engineered GFLV into a biotechnology tool by cloning infectious GFLV genomic cDNAs into binary vectors, with or without further modifications, and using Agrobacterium tumefaciens delivery to infect Nicotiana benthamiana. Tagging GFLV with fluorescent proteins allowed tracking of the virus within N. benthamiana and Chenopodium quinoa tissues, and imbuing GFLV with partial plant gene sequences proved the concept that endogenous plant genes can be knocked down.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Multiple Variants of Grapevine
    Detection of Multiple Variants of Grapevine Fanleaf Virus in Single Xiphinema index Nematodes Shahinez Garcia, Jean-Michel Hily, Veronique Komar, Claude Gertz, Gerard Demangeat, Olivier Lemaire, Emmanuelle Vigne To cite this version: Shahinez Garcia, Jean-Michel Hily, Veronique Komar, Claude Gertz, Gerard Demangeat, et al.. Detec- tion of Multiple Variants of Grapevine Fanleaf Virus in Single Xiphinema index Nematodes. Viruses, MDPI, 2019, 11 (12), pp.1139. 10.3390/v11121139. hal-03017540 HAL Id: hal-03017540 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03017540 Submitted on 20 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. viruses Article Detection of Multiple Variants of Grapevine Fanleaf Virus in Single Xiphinema index Nematodes 1, 1,2, 1 1 Shahinez Garcia y, Jean-Michel Hily y ,Véronique Komar , Claude Gertz , Gérard Demangeat 1, Olivier Lemaire 1 and Emmanuelle Vigne 1,* 1 Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) Santé de la Vigne et Qualité du Vin, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Strasbourg, BP 20507, 68021 Colmar Cedex, France; [email protected] (S.G.); [email protected] (J.-M.H.); [email protected] (V.K.); [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (G.D.); [email protected] (O.L.) 2 Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin (IFV), 30240 Le Grau-Du-Roi, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-389-224-955 These authors contributed equally to the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Nematode-Borne Viruses of Grapevine, Their Epidemiology and Control (1)
    Nematol. medit. (1978), 6: 1·27. I stituto di Patologia vegetale, Universita degli Studi 70126 Bari, Italy NEMATODE-BORNE VIRUSES OF GRAPEVINE, THEIR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL (1) by GIOVANNI P. MARTELLI INTRODUCTION The discovery of a nematode vector for the fanleaf disease of grapevine (Hewitt et al., 1958) together with the demonstration that the viral agent was mechanically transmissible to herbaceous hosts (Cadman et aI., 1960) greatly stimulated investigations on viruses of cultivated Vi tis. Consequently, in little less than two decades many different viruses have been manually transmitted from diseased vines in several grape-growing countries. By 1976 there were 24 viruses recorded from grapevine (Martelli, 1978) half of which are either recognized or putative members of the nepovirus group (Table I). At present, nepoviruses are the only nematode-borne pathogens known to infect grapevine in which they may cause destructive diseases. Although occurring in the major viticultural areas of the world, not all the viruses are equally widespread. Thus, with the exception of grapevine fanleaf virus (GFV) which is ubiquitous (Hewitt, 1968) and uniquely specialized for having no natural host other than grapevine, other viruses like arabis mosaic (AMV), tomato black (1) The present review is largely based on an invitation paper given at the Conference on «Plant Disease Epidemiology and Dispersal of Plant Para­ sites », London, 14-18 December, 1977. Grateful thanks are espressed to Drs. T. J. W. Alphey, H. F. Dias, R. I. B. Francki, F. Lamberti, A. F. Murant, D. C. Ramsdell, M. Rudel and J. K. Uyemoto for kindly providing unpublished data or manuscripts prior to publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Iowa
    Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS Volume 96 Number Article 8 1989 Plant-parasitic Nematodes in Iowa Don C. Norton Iowa State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright © Copyright 1989 by the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias Part of the Anthropology Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Norton, Don C. (1989) "Plant-parasitic Nematodes in Iowa," Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS, 96(1), 24-32. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias/vol96/iss1/8 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jour. Iowa Acad. Sci. 96(1):24-32, 1989 Plant-parasitic Nematodes in Iowa1 DON C. NORTON Department of Plant Pathology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 Ninety-nine species of plant-parasitic nematodes are recorded from Iowa. Twenty-seven are new scare records. Mose samples were collected from around maize or from prairies or woodlands. Similarity (Sorensen's index) of species was highest for rhe maize-prairie habitats (0.49), compared with maize-woodlands (0. 23), or prairie-woodland (0. 3 7) habirars. Nematode communities were most diverse in prairies with a Shannon-Weiner index (H') of 2.74, compared wirh I.65 and 1.07 for woodlands and maize habitats, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Fungicide Farmayod on Agrotechnical and Technological Indicators of Grapevine, on Viral Diseases and Oidium
    E3S Web of Conferences 273, 01020 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127301020 INTERAGROMASH 2021 Effect of fungicide farmayod on agrotechnical and technological indicators of grapevine, on viral diseases and oidium Nadezda Sirotkina1* 1All-Russian Research Institute named after Ya.I. Potapenko for Viticulture and Winemaking – Branch of Federal Rostov Agricultural Research Center, 346421, Novocherkassk, Russia Abstract. The paper presents the study on the effect of Farmayod’s GR (100 g/l of iodine) spraying on vineyards of Cabernet Sauvignon and Baklanovsky varieties on the degree of viral and oidium prevalence as well as on agrobiological and technological indicators. According to the aggregate agrobiological and technological indicators, the best results on Cabernet Sauvignon variety were obtained when the drug was used at a concentration of 0.06 %. On the Baklanovsky variety the best indicators were obtained at a drug concentration of 0.04%. Testing of plant samples for the presence of Grapevine fan leaf virus, Arabis mosaic virus and Oidium tuckeri showed that after two years of applying the drug, the prevalence of infected plants (P, %) with Grapevine fanleaf virus on the Cabernet Sauvignon cultivar varied from 0% (fungicide concentration 0.04 and 0.05 %) to 0.8 % (0.06 %) and 2.65 % (control). For Baklanovsky variety: Grapevine fanleaf virus - concentration 0.04 % - 1.8; 0.05 % - 0.4; 0.06 % - 2.0; control - 2.65 %. Arabis mosaic virus – 0; 0; 3.0; 12.1 %, respectively. Oidium tuckeri was 0 % in all variants with any drug concentrations. Control variant and later 80 % for 29.09. 1 Introduction The vine (Vitis spp.) is undoubtedly one of the woody crops most widely grown in temperate climates, and a very valuable agricultural commodity.
    [Show full text]
  • Xiphinema Americanum Cobb, 1913
    -- CALIFORNIA D EPAUMENT OF cdfa FOOD & AGRICULTURE ~ California Pest Rating Proposal for Xiphinema americanum Cobb, 1913 American dagger nematode Current Pest Rating: C Proposed Pest Rating: C Kingdom: Animalia; Phylum: Nematoda; Class: Enoplea Order: Dorylaimida; Superfamily: Dorylaimoidea; Family: Longidoridae; Subfamily: Xiphineminae Comment Period: 02/27/2020 through 04/12/2020 Initiating Event: On August 9, 2019, USDA-APHIS published a list of “Native and Naturalized Plant Pests Permitted by Regulation”. Interstate movement of these plant pests is no longer federally regulated within the 48 contiguous United States. There are 49 plant pathogens (bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes) on this list. California may choose to continue to regulate movement of some or all these pathogens into and within the state. In order to assess the needs and potential requirements to issue a state permit, a formal risk analysis for Xiphinema americanum is given herein and a permanent pest rating is proposed. History & Status: Background: Xiphinema americanum sensu lato (in the broad sense) is a migratory root ectoparasitic nematode that is widespread in North America (Robbins, 1993). This species inhabits the rhizosphere soils of host plants while feeding on roots. Eggs are laid singly in the soil and hatch in approximately one week. A population may be founded by a single larva. Once hatched, each larval stage must feed in order to molt and develop to the next stage. Larvae and adults feed by means of a long stylet that is used to penetrate the vascular tissue of roots. Males are very rare, and reproduction is apparently by parthenogenesis. The life cycle can take four years to complete (Halbrendt and Brown, 1992 and 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Xiphinema Americanum Sensu Lato
    EPPO quarantine pest Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Xiphinema americanum sensu lato IDENTITY • Xiphinema americanum sensu lato Name: Xiphinema americanum Cobb sensu lato Synonyms: Tylencholaimus americanus (Cobb) Micoletzky Taxonomic position: Nematoda: Longidoridae Common names: American dagger nematode (English) Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature: For some time the designation of X. americanum has been disputed. Tarjan (1969) considered that X. americanum was a single species with large intraspecific variation, whereas Lima (1968) argued for a species complex containing seven species. Lamberti & Bleve-Zacheo (1979) divided the species into 15 new species and believed that at least 25 species could be recognized as belonging to the species complex. Current opinion puts the number of species at more than 40, one of which is X. americanum sensu stricto. However, the differences between several described species are small, while there is little information on intraspecific variability. For these reasons, and because the illustrations of many of the species are poor, few taxonomists would claim to be able to separate the species with certainty. An international group of taxonomists, under the auspices of EPPO, is currently making a morphological study of the species complex to try to clarify the relationships within it. Other research is directed towards the use of genetic techniques to distinguish species (Vrain et al., 1992). In the meantime, it is difficult to interpret most of the published data on the distribution, host/parasite relationships and virus-vector abilities of the component species. This data sheet considers X. americanum sensu lato, the species complex as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheet on Arabis Mosaic Nepovirus
    Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Arabis mosaic nepovirus IDENTITY Name: Arabis mosaic nepovirus Synonyms: Raspberry yellow dwarf virus Taxonomic position: Viruses: Comoviridae: Nepovirus Common names: ArMV (acronym) Arabis mosaic (English) EPPO computer code: ARMXXX EU Annex designation: II/A2 HOSTS ArMV has a wide host range including a number of important crop plants. When mechanically inoculated, 93 species from 28 dicotyledonous families were shown to be infected (Schmelzer, 1963). In a survey of alternative hosts for hop viruses, positive ELISA-readings were obtained in 33 out of 152 species tested (Eppler, 1989). Principal hosts are strawberries, hops, Vitis spp., raspberries (Rubus idaeus), Rheum spp. and Sambucus nigra. The virus has also been reported from sugarbeet, celery, Gladiolus, horseradish and lettuces. A number of other cultivated and wild species have been reported as hosts. All these crop hosts and many wild plant hosts occur throughout the EPPO region. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION EPPO region: Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus (found but not established), Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia (European, Far East), Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, Ukraine and Yugoslavia. Asia: Japan, Kazakhstan, Russia (Far East), Turkey. Africa: South Africa. North America: Canada (British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec). Oceania: Australia (Tasmania, Victoria), New Zealand. EU: Present. BIOLOGY On the basis of polyclonal antisera, all ArMV strains known so far are closely related to one another and distantly related to grapevine fanleaf virus (GVFLV). The close relationship of ArMV and GVFLV (not only serologically) has given rise to the assumption that the two viruses may have the same origin, or even that GVFLV is the origin of ArMV (Hewitt, 1985).
    [Show full text]