DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT LERØY SEAFOOD GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2016 1 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORY 4 IMPORTANT EVENTS IN 2016 6 STRATEGIC EVENTS 8 KEY FIGURES FOR THE GROUP 10 ANNUAL STATEMENT BY THE GROUP CEO 12 LERØY SEAFOOD GROUP – BUSINESS OVERVIEW 15 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 29 BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT REGARDING SALARY AND OTHER REMUNERATION OF EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL 40 ENVIRONMENT 42 BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ REPORT 77 RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CEO 86 INCOME STATEMENT 87 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 88 BALANCE SHEET 89 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW 91 CHANGE IN EQUITY 92 NOTES, LERØY SEAFOOD GROUP CONSOLIDATED 2016 93 ANNUAL REPORT LERØY SEAFOOD GROUP ASA 166 AUDITOR’S REPORT 184 ADDRESSES 190 FINANCIAL CALENDAR 2017 11.05.2017 PRESENTATION OF THE 1ST QUARTER 2017 24.08.2017 PRESENTATION OF THE 2ND QUARTER 2017 09.11.2017 PRESENTATION OF THE 3RD QUARTER 2017 27.02.2018 PRELIMINARY RESULT FOR THE YEAR 2017 23.05.2017 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING LERØY SEAFOOD GROUP LERØY SEAFOOD GROUP 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 3 At the turn of the new millennium, large parts of the fish in the Sales & Distribution segment. This segment not farming industry were seriously undercapitalised and only sells its own production of salmon and trout, but suffering from the impact of a short-term perspective and also has a high level of sales activity in cooperation with a lack of risk management. This was not compatible with third parties, ensuring a wide product range for the Group the requirements placed on enterprises in the fish farming within seafood. In recent years, the Group has also made industry at that time. Lerøy Seafood Group had achieved a significant investments in processing facilities, in order to more solid position by August 2003, when they purchased take part in leading the “revolution” within the distribution Nye Midnor AS as it was then called – the company that of fresh seafood. These investments have been made in currently makes up the main share of Lerøy Midt AS. what is known as “fish-cuts”, processing facilities where The Group went on to acquire Lerøy Aurora AS in 2005, proximity to the customer is key. The distribution of fresh Fossen AS and the remaining shares in Hydrotech-Gruppen seafood requires quality throughout the entire organisation, AS in 2006, Lerøy Vest in 2007 via a business combination flexibility, continuity in supply and a high level of service. and a majority shareholding in Sjøtroll Havbruk AS in Today, the Group has a number of fish-cut facilities across 2010. The acquisition and demerger of Villa Organic were Europe, and sells its products to more than 70 markets conducted in 2014. The above-mentioned companies worldwide. The Sales & Distribution segment currently along with a number of minor acquisitions have, together employs 830 persons, 398 of whom work in Norway. with highly skilled local management, been developed via organic growth to form what is now one of the world’s Ever since its very foundation, the Group has taken a Elias Fjellstad on his way to the fishmarket in Bergen largest producers of Atlantic salmon and trout. The fish pioneering role within a number of areas in the Norwegian, farming segment employed 1,323 persons at the end and subsequently international, seafood industry. The of 2015 in Norway. main focus has always been on developing the markets for seafood. The Group has very frequently been the first to The Group has over time made substantial investments launch on new markets, or to commercialise new species HISTORY within the Processing segment (VAP). These investments of fish. One of the main goals for the Group is to be an in VAP (value-added processing) not only generate a wider innovator within seafood, and preferably in cooperation The Lerøy Seafood Group can trace its operations back to The potential for growth within fish farming in combination product range and open the door to new markets, but also with the end customer. This is important not only within the end of the 19th century, when the fisherman-farmer with increasing customer requirements necessitated provide more room for manoeuvre in relation to the sale product development, but also in other areas such as the Ole Mikkel Lerøen started selling live fish on the Bergen fish a radical change in the Group’s business concept and of own produced salmon and trout. The Group made their development of efficient logistics and distribution. market. This was fish he either had caught himself or bought strategy. The new strategy was extremely capital ambitions clear in 2002 with the investment in fish smoking This pioneering spirit is still very much alive in the Group. from other fishermen. The fish was hauled to market in intensive. Up to 1997, the Group had been a family-owned capacity in Sweden (Lerøy Smøgen). They went on in 2005 corfs behind Ole Mikkel Lerøen’s rowing boat from the island operation. In 1997, a private placing with financial investors to invest in a processing facility for whitefish in Bulandet 2016 will go down as one of the most important years in of Lerøy to the fish market in Bergen, a journey that could was carried out for the first time. The purpose of the placing (Bulandet Fiskeindustri) in order to further expand their the company’s long history. Lerøy Seafood Group acquired take between six and twelve hours, depending on prevailing was to develop the Group throughout the entire value product range. In 2006, the Group expanded its high-value 100% of the shares in Havfisk ASA (a shipowning company winds and currents. chain, and participate in the future consolidation of the fish processing plant for trout and salmon on the island of with trawlers) and 100% of the shares in Norway Seafoods farming industry. The initial step of what was to become a Osterøy (Lerøy Fossen). The Group’s acquisition of 50.1% Group AS. These are two of the largest companies in Over time, Ole Mikkel Lerøen’s operations gradually came to number of major investments within fish farming occurred of the shares in the Dutch seafood company Rode Beheer Europe within wild catches and processing of whitefish include retail sales in Bergen, the sale of live shellfish and in 1999, when the company acquired a minority interest BV Group took place in 2012. The Group has subsequently respectively. With this investment, the Group has a budding export business. In 1939, two of his employees, in what was then Hydrotech-Gruppen AS. In the summer gone on to expand capacity at all its existing plants. gained the opportunity to embark on a new and exciting Hallvard Lerøy sr. and Elias Fjeldstad, established a of 2001, Norskott Havbruk AS was founded with the sole The framework conditions for industrial development development, whereby wild catches and processing wholesaler and seafood export company – Hallvard Lerøy purpose of acquiring Golden Sea Products, now Scottish Sea in Norway are increasingly unsatisfactory, resulting in of whitefish shall be integrated into the Group’s well- AS. In time, the company invested in a facility where they Farms Ltd. in the UK. a trend whereby production is outsourced from Norway established value chain. Lerøy Seafood Group is now a fully could receive pelagic and whitefish and carry out fish to countries with low production costs. integrated company, having achieved control of the entire farming. Poor results and insufficient capitalisation in the The Group was listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange in June value chain for a full range of seafood products – from the late 1980s and early 1990s forced the company to close 2002, providing access to the capital market for the Despite this trend, Lerøy Seafood Group has invested sea to the consumer. down its facility for receipt of fish and sell its shareholdings Group and thereby strategic financial room to manoeuvre. heavily in Norway, most recently with the development at that time in fish farming in order to safeguard their core Sufficient access to capital and expertise have been critical and doubling in capacity of the plant on the island of At the start of 2017, the seafood corporation Lerøy Seafood operation: wholesale and exports. In 1994, the company factors in the development of the Group from a wholesaler/ Osterøy outside Bergen in 2014. The VAP segment currently Group has a unique position for further growth carried out a last emergency share issue and started the seafood exporter to the current global and fully integrated employs 510 persons, 176 of these work in Norway. and development. process of re-establishing a healthy business. At that time, seafood corporation. The Group’s ambition to increase demand for seafood in the company’s equity was valued at NOK 20 million, prior the form of new products for new markets has constantly to an issue worth NOK 5 million. been the driving force behind the Group’s investments LERØY SEAFOOD GROUP LERØY SEAFOOD GROUP 4 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 5 The new well boat, Seihav, was christened in Austevoll on 8 October 2016, and the ceremony was then celebrated with a procession to Bergen and a meal in the city. IMPORTANT EVENTS IN 2016 • 2016 will now go down in the record books as one smolt to and from cages and slaughtering plants. during the first half of 2017. By that time, they 50%. Direct delivery from well boat to factory of the most exciting years in the history of Lerøy In addition, Seihav has the capacity for fish sorting are expected to have an average weight of 5 kg. will improve fish health and increase the rate Seafood Group ASA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Homogenization of Norwegian Monthly Precipitation Series for the Period 1961-2018
    No. 4/2021 ISSN 2387-4201 METreport Climate Homogenization of Norwegian monthly precipitation series for the period 1961-2018 Elinah Khasandi Kuya, Herdis Motrøen Gjelten, Ole Einar Tveito METreport Title Date Homogenization of Norwegian monthly 2021-04-30 precipitation series for the period 1961-2018 Section Report no. Division for Climate Services No. 4/2021 Author(s) Classification Elinah Khasandi Kuya, Herdis Motrøen Gjelten, ● Free ○ Restricted Ole Einar Tveito Abstract Climatol homogenization method was applied to detect inhomogeneities in Norwegian precipitation series, during the period 1961-2018. 370 series (including 44 from Sweden and one from Finland) of monthly precipitation sums, from the ClimNorm precipitation dataset were used in the analysis. The homogeneity analysis produced a 58-year long homogenous dataset for 325 monthly precipitation sum with regional temporal variability and spatial coherence that is better than that of non-homogenized series. The dataset is more reliable in explaining the large-scale climate variations and was used to calculate the new climate normals in Norway. Keywords Homogenization, climate normals, precipitation Disciplinary signature Responsible signature 2 Abstract Climate normals play an important role in weather and climate studies and therefore require high-quality dataset that is both consistent and homogenous. The Norwegian observation network has changed considerably during the last 20-30 years, introducing non-climatic changes such as automation and relocation. Homogenization was therefore necessary and work has been done to establish a homogeneous precipitation reference dataset for the purpose of calculating the new climatological standard normals for the period 1991-2020. The homogenization tool Climatol was applied to detect inhomogeneities in the Norwegian precipitation series for the period 1961-2018.
    [Show full text]
  • A High Resolution Tidal Model for the Coast of M°Re and Tr
    Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography Vol. 57, 65–82. Oslo. ISSN 0029-1951 A high resolution tidal model for the coast of Møre and Trøndelag, Mid- Norway HALVARD MOE, BJØRN GJEVIK & ATLE OMMUNDSEN Moe, H., Gjevik, B. & Ommundsen, A. 2003. A high resolution tidal model for the coast of Møre and Trøndelag, Mid-Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography Vol. 57, 65–82. Oslo. ISSN 0029-1951. A numerical model with grid resolution 500 m has been used to simulate tides on a section of the shelf off the coast of Møre and Trøndelag in western Norway. The model spans c. 3° latitude and covers a sea area of c. 8.104 km2. The fine spatial resolution resolves important fine scale features of the bottom topography on the shelf and the complex coastline with fjords and islands. Boundary conditions at the oceanic sides of the model domain are obtained by interpolation from a larger scale tidal model cover- ing the Nordic Seas. The semi-diurnal components M2, S2 and N2 and the diurnal component K1 are simulated. Harmonic constants for sea level are compared with observations from 28 stations. The standard deviations between the observed and modeled ampli- tudes and phases for the dominant semi-diurnal component M2 are 1.7 cm and 4.8–7.0° respectively. Current fields from the model are compared with measurements from stations along the pipeline from Tjeldbergodden on the coast to the oil and gas fields on the northern rim of Haltenbanken. Parameters, particularly for the M2 current ellipse, are found to be in good agreement with mea- surements.
    [Show full text]
  • Basis of Project
    UHI Thesis - pdf download summary North West of Scotland and Western Norway A comparative study of factors which can impact on small-scale agriculture within similar peripheral communities Parsons, Gavin Christopher DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (AWARDED BY OU/ABERDEEN) Award date: 2011 Awarding institution: The University of Edinburgh Link URL to thesis in UHI Research Database General rights and useage policy Copyright,IP and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the UHI Research Database are retained by the author, users must recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement, or without prior permission from the author. Users may download and print one copy of any thesis from the UHI Research Database for the not-for-profit purpose of private study or research on the condition that: 1) The full text is not changed in any way 2) If citing, a bibliographic link is made to the metadata record on the the UHI Research Database 3) You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain 4) You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the UHI Research Database Take down policy If you believe that any data within this document represents a breach of copyright, confidence or data protection please contact us at [email protected] providing details; we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value Aspect of Reallocating Seafood Freight from Road to Sea
    DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68779 Provisional chapter Chapter 4 The Value Aspect of Reallocating Seafood Freight from TheRoad Value to Sea Aspect Transport of Reallocating Seafood Freight from Road to Sea Transport Per Engelseth, Irina V. Karlsen, Shulin Huang Perand Engelseth, Arild Hoff Irina V. Karlsen, Shulin Huang and AdditionalArild Hoff information is available at the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68779 Abstract A case study elaborates on the project organization promoting change of transport mode in a food chain from a value perspective. This project organization may perspectively be viewed as a supply chain with value conceptions different from the everyday seafood supply chain it is meant to develop. Value is in this project context revealed as an inter- subjective complex phenomenon, founded in that value conceptions by actors located at different locations in the supply chain. This renders customer value as one of many dynamic value components in this project organization. Value embedded in a supply chain is therefore always a source of uncertainty, a subjective perspective; it cannot be considered as a clear functional purpose in projects aimed at developing food supply. The route to reallocate seafood freight should therefore focus on organizing interconnec- tivity to support networking and the project members accepting that the project outcome is emergent. Keywords: food logistics, sustainability, short sea shipping, intermodal transport, customer value, supply chain management 1. Introduction Established 45 years ago, the Norwegian aquaculture industry has progressively grown, which has now become one of the most important industries in Norway’s economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyllestad – Askvoll – Fjaler - Solund – Gulen - Sogn Og Fjordane – Vestland – Norge - Verda Kven Er HAFS Og Gulen?
    HAFS og Gulen i Vestland Hyllestad – Askvoll – Fjaler - Solund – Gulen - Sogn og Fjordane – Vestland – Norge - Verda Kven er HAFS og Gulen? Hyllestad Gulen kommune kommune Hyllestad ligg på nordsida av Gulen er ein kommune i Ytre Sogn som ligg ved innløpet til Sognefjorden i Ytre Sogn. Sognefjorden. Kommunen har hatt uendra Landarealet på 596km² inneheld ein variert og spennande natur. grenser frå 1861 då kommunen med 1500 øyar, holmar og skjer, vart skilt frå Askvoll og Lavik. og eit fastland. Innbyggjartal: 2 315 Innbyggjartal: 1378 Askvoll kommune Fjaler kommune Solund kommune Askvoll ligg i Sunnfjord ut mot Fjaler er ein kommune i Nordsjøen. Askvoll byr på mektige Sunnfjord på sørsida av Solund naturopplevingar - frå fjord til øyar Dalsfjorden. Kommunen grenser er den vestlegaste ytst i havgapet. Lengst vest i mot Gaular i aust, og i sør mot kommunen i Norge. Med 1700 øyar, havgapet ligg Bulandet og Høyanger og Hyllestad. Dale er holmar og skjær vest i havgapet Solund Værlandet, godt vakta av administrasjonssenteret og ligg er eit populært reisemål for majestetiske Alden. like ved Dalsfjordbrua. båt- og fiskeferiar. Innbyggjartal: 3052 Innbyggjartal: 2846 Innbyggjartal: 807 HAFS regionråd HAFS regionråd er eit politisk samarbeidsorgan for kommunane Hyllestad, Gulen, Askvoll, Fjaler og Hallvard Oppedal, Solund, og er kommunane sitt felles Gulen ansikt utad. Formålet til regionrådet er å utgreie og løyse viktige og strategiske saker av felles interesse i regionen. Gunn Mongstad, Gunhild Berge Stang, Ole Andre Klausen, Solund Fjaler Askvoll Rådet skal ivareta interessene til regionen ovanfor fylket, stat og andre organ på regions-, fylke- og riksplan. Morten Askvik, Hyllestad Vi er få og livskraftige! Med ein lang og stolt industritradisjon! Klausen mekaniske verkstad Dale skofabrikk Produksjonen starta i 1948 Starta i 1911 som A/S Jarl Skofabrikk.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitbergen.Com Fjords and Glaciers
    Krokane Florø Skei JOSTEDALSBREEN NIGARDS- Stavang t e BREEN Naustdal tn Jølsterva Askrova Svanøybukt Førde Dale Moskog Norwegian 1 Glacier Museum Gaupne Eikenes Fjærland en d Askvoll r Gaularfjellet o j Dale f Gjervik Viken a r Værlandet n t e s d u r Hafslo L jo f Bulandet s Fure d Solvorn Ornes m la Buy your tickets at the Tourist Information r jæ Salbu F Sogndal 2018 Get ready to EXPLORE the adventure Høyanger Dragsvik Details and online booking: Vadheim Hella Gåsvær Leikanger Nordeide Balestrand Mann- Kaupanger heller Sula Krakhella Måren www.norwayactive.no Booking and more information: Vangsnes Fodnes Information and bookings: Ytrøy Rysjedalsvika DEN Lavik FJOR GNE Norwegian Wild SO Ortnevik Salmon Centre Daløy Frønningen Lærdal www.hoytlavt.no/bergen (+47) 55 10 20 00, of fjords and mountains Rutledal Vik Please contact us at info@fl oyen.no or by phone (+47) 55 30 68 00 Hardbakke Håbakken Finden Oppedal Utvær Bjordal Nåra [email protected] en Bergen rd jo Fløibanen yf Myrdal rø æ Bergen Gudvangen N Nesttun Flåm Myrdal Fedje Sævrøy Stalheim Flåm Myrdal 13 Nærøyfjord Information & Booking: Hellesøy Voss Gudvangen Bergen Tourist Information or stord1.ticket.no Tjeldstø Øygarden Blomvåg Gudvangen FJORDS Fjord tours & Excursions in the Bergen region Bergen Voss Garnes V o s s Garnes © Rune Tokvam / Flåm Guide service BERGEN Bergen Midtun Glesvær 20 Hatvik Kafe Klokkarvik Krokeide Midtun 13 Venjaneset 21 Os Bjørnefjorden Panorama Gjestetun Hotel 11 12 Mundheim 3a HARDANGERVIDDA Solstrand Hotel & Bad 17 13 The Lysøen Bergen Nestunet
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunestrukturutredning Snillfjord, Hitra Og Frøya Sluttrapport
    Kommunestrukturutredning Snillfjord, Hitra og Frøya Sluttrapport ANJA HJELSETH, PER KRISTIAN ROKO KALLAGER, AUDUN THORSTENSEN, SONDRE GROVEN OG MARIT OWREN NYGAARD TF-rapport nr. 369 2015 Tittel: Kommunestruktur Snillfjord, Hitra og Frøya Undertittel: Sluttrapport TF-rapport nr.: 369 Forfatter(e): Anja Hjelseth, Per Kristian Roko Kallager, Audun Thorstensen, Sondre Groven og Marit Owren Nygaard Dato: 01.11.15 ISBN: 978-82-7401-858-7 ISSN: 1501-9918 Pris: 150,- (Kan lastes ned gratis fra www.telemarksforsking.no) Framsidefoto: Telemarksforsking Prosjekt: Utredning av kommunestruktur på Nordmøre Prosjektnr.: 20150650 Prosjektleder: Anja Hjelseth Oppdragsgiver(e): Snillfjord, Hitra og Frøya kommuner Spørsmål om denne rapporten kan rettes til: Telemarksforsking Postboks 4 3833 Bø i Telemark Tlf: +47 35 06 15 00 www.telemarksforsking.no Resymé: Denne sluttrapporten belyser fordeler og ulemper ved sammenslåing av Snillfjord, Hitra og Frøya kommuner knyttet til samfunnsutvikling, økonomi, tjenesteproduksjon og lokaldemokrati. Anja Hjelseth er utdannet siviløkonom, og har vært ansatt ved Telemarksforsking siden 2013. Hun jobber med kommunalforsking, og har blant annet vært involvert i en rekke utredninger knyttet til kommunestruktur. Anja har vært prosjektleder for arbeidet på Nordmøre, og blant annet hatt hovedansvaret for spørreundersøkelsen, rapportene om tjenesteyting og lokaldemokrati, samt sluttrapporten. Audun Thorstensen er utdannet statsviter, og har vært ansatt ved Telemarksforsking siden 2007. Han jobber spesielt med kommunaløkonomi og KOSTRA-analyser, og har vært ansvarlig for de økonomiske beregningene og økonomirapporten i denne utredningen. Per Kristian Roko Kallager er utdannet statsviter og har vært ansatt som forskningsassistent ved Telemarksforsking siden våren 2015. Per jobber på kommunalområdet, og har siden oppstarten bidratt i flere utredninger knyttet til kommunestruktur.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the History of the Norvegr 2000 BC–1000 AD
    Einar Østmo 1 The History of the Norvegr 2000 BC–1000 AD When written in Chinese the word crisis is composed of two characters. One represents danger, and the other represents opportunity. John F. Kennedy, Indianapolis, April 12, 1959 Stretching for more than 2000 kilometres, Norway’s rugged coast has always posed a challenge to seafarers. Distribution of Late Neolithic artefacts imported from South Scandinavia indicates that coastal navigation became commonplace from approximately 2400 BC. Certain place- names of islands and promontories can probably be dated to the Bronze Age, indicating that the western sea-route must have been established during this period, when vessels were still pro- pelled by paddling and aristocratic societies flourished. By the early Iron Age, rowing had taken over from paddling, allowing for bigger and faster ships. Nor(ð)vegr may have been established as the name of the sea-route at this time, when again aristocratic societies existed in the region. In the Viking Age, northern ships were equipped with sails, permitting voyages across the Atlantic. By then, Norway had become the name of the country, which eventually was united as one kingdom. Thus, the development of the name can be seen as running parallel to three main stages of shipbuilding and to three stages of aristocratic splendour in Scandinavia: the Bronze Age, the early Iron Age, and the Viking Age. Norway, encompassing the western part of the Scandinavian Peninsula, is a land of extremes and natural dynamism hardly equalled anywhere in Europe. Above all, the coast can be singled out as the country’s most striking feature.
    [Show full text]
  • Kulturminneplan for Askvoll Kommune 2019–2023
    KULTURMINNEPLAN FOR ASKVOLL KOMMUNE 2019–2023 KULTURMINNEPLAN FOR ASKVOLL 2019–2023 Føreord 3 DEL 1 – BAKGRUNN FOR PLANEN 4 1.1 Definisjonar og lovgrunnlag 4 1.2 Bakgrunn for planarbeidet 5 1.3 Tidlegare kulturminnearbeid 7 DEL 2 – OVERSYN OVER KULTURMINNA 9 2.1 Kort oversyn over Askvoll si historie 9 2.2 Kulturminne frå før reformasjonen (automatisk freda) 11 2.2.1 Buplassar og aktivitetsområde 11 2.2.2 Gravminne og bautasteinar 13 2.2.3 Bergkunst 15 2.2.4 Jordfunn 16 2.2.5 Bygningar 17 2.2.6 Religiøse kulturminne 17 2.2.7 Immaterielle kulturminne 18 2.3 Kulturminne frå nyare tid 20 2.3.1 Religiøse kulturminne 20 2.3.2 Industrielle bygningar og aktivitetsspor 22 2.3.3 Fiskeri, naust og sjøbumiljø 24 2.3.4 Landbruk, kulturlandskap og gardsbygningar 25 2.3.5 Samferdsle og kommunikasjonar 28 2.3.6 Kraftstasjonar og elektrisitet 31 2.3.7 Skulehus, forsamlingshus og andre offentlege fellesbygg 32 2.3.8 Andre verdskrigen 33 2.3.9 Minnesmerke 35 2.3.10 Arkiv og fotografi 36 2.3.11 Immaterielle kulturminne 36 DEL 3 – HANDLINGSDEL 39 3.1 Mål 39 3.2 Planperiode 39 3.3 Ressursar til arbeidet 39 3.3 Prioritering av kulturminne 40 3.4 Tiltak 41 Kjelder 42 Register 43 2 Føreord Kulturminna våre er bitar i det store puslespelet som utgjer historia vår. Dei er såleis viktige byggjesteinar for identiteten vår og oppfatninga av kvar vi kjem frå. Fortidas kulturminne er med oss i notida og gjev oss grunnlag for å byggje samfunnet i framtida.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Degree Thesis
    Master’s degree thesis LOG950 Logistics Reallocation of seafood freight flows from road to sea Irina Karlsen and Shulin Huang Number of pages including this page: 94 Molde, 23.05.2016 1 Mandatory statement Each student is responsible for complying with rules and regulations that relate to examinations and to academic work in general. The purpose of the mandatory statement is to make students aware of their responsibility and the consequences of cheating. Failure to complete the statement does not excuse students from their responsibility. Please complete the mandatory statement by placing a mark in each box for statements 1-6 below. 1. I/we hereby declare that my/our paper/assignment is my/our own work, and that I/we have not used other sources or received other help than mentioned in the paper/assignment. 2. I/we hereby declare that this paper Mark each 1. Has not been used in any other exam at another box: department/university/university college 1. 2. Is not referring to the work of others without acknowledgement 2. 3. Is not referring to my/our previous work without acknowledgement 3. 4. Has acknowledged all sources of literature in the text and in the list of references 4. 5. Is not a copy, duplicate or transcript of other work 5. I am/we are aware that any breach of the above will be considered as cheating, and may result in annulment of the examination and 3. exclusion from all universities and university colleges in Norway for up to one year, according to the Act relating to Norwegian Universities and University Colleges, section 4-7 and 4-8 and Examination regulations section 14 and 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan for Idrett Og Fysisk Aktivitet – Høringsutkast
    HØRINGSUTKAST Sak 2020/756 PLAN FOR IDRETT OG FYSISK AKTIVITET 2020 – 2023 Plan for idrett og fysisk aktivitet 2020 - 2023 INNHOLDSFORTEGNELSE Innholdsfortegnelse ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Innledning ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Mål i kommuneplanen .............................................................................................. 4 1.2 Statlige føringer for planarbeidet ................................................................................ 4 Kulturdepartementets veileder ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Folkehelseloven ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Andre planer og retningslinjer ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Fylkeskommunale føringer ........................................................................................ 6 Hvilke anlegg prioriteres til spillemidler av Trøndelag fylkeskommune ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status for Kystblåstjerne Tractema Verna I Norge
    BLYTTIA NORGES BOTANISKE ANNALER Status for kystblåstjerne Tractema verna i Norge Bjørn Harald Larsen, John Bjarne Jordal og Anders Lundberg Larsen, B.H., Jordal, J.B. & Lundberg, A. 2017. Status for kystblåstjerne Tractema verna i Norge. Blyttia 75: 8-31. Status of Spring squill Tractema verna in Norway. The status of Tractema verna populations in Norway is summarized, based on data from Norwegian herbaria, literature and interviews, and our own investigations mainly in the period 2003–2016. The species is known from three counties along the coast of western Norway: Rogaland (one locality), Sogn og Fjordane (83 localities, 77 of which are intact) and Møre og Romsdal (five intact localities within a rather small area, formerly 15 localities). The current population is estimated to be 250.000 based on counting of flowering plants, and more than 95% is located in Askvoll, Sogn og Fjordane, with additional populations in Solund (3000–5000) and Flora (a few hundreds); while the estimate is 600 plants in Rogaland and 1200 in Møre og Romsdal. There are also earlier reports from Bremanger and Selje in Sogn og Fjordane, but no recent information. Tractema verna prefers a traditionally managed cultural landscape with unfertilized pastures and meadows. Although some previously unknown localities were identified, a population decline is documented. This is caused by changes in land use. Ceased grazing and mowing causes overgrowing, which is the main threat against the populations. The building of houses and roads have also destroyed some populations. Management like grazing and mowing combined with monitoring is necessary to preserve the remaining populations.
    [Show full text]