DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2005 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Supporting Revolutionary Ideas Today, And Advanced Concepts For Tomorrow NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts Annual 2005 Report 2006 Performance Period July 12, 2005 - July 11, 2006 NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts 75 5th Street NW, Suite 318 Atlanta, GA 30308 404-347-9633 - www.niac.usra.edu USRA is a non-profit corpora- tion under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences, with an institutional membership of 97. For more information about USRA, see its website at www.usra.edu. ANSER is a not-for-profit pub- lic service research corpora- tion, serving the national inter- est since 1958.To learn more about ANSER, see its website at www.ANSER.org. NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts 8 t h A N N U A L R E P O R T Performance Period July 12, 2005 - July 11, 2006 NIANIACC seeksseeks adadvvancedanced conceconceptpt prproposalsoposals basedbased onon soundsound scientifscientificic principlesprinciples thathatt araree aattainattainabblele withinwithin aa 1010 toto 40-y40-yearear timetime Advanced Concepts frframeame andand strstretcetchh thethe imaimaginaginationtion ofof thethe humanhuman mind.mind. NIAC SUPPORTS Institute for THE NASA VISION NIAC inspires and investi- gates options for future mis- sions that may reveal tech- nologies and approaches NASA which could impact near term missions. 4 Message From The Director Inspiring Grand Visions for Space Exploration and Aeronautics Over the last eight tary surfaces. Several NIAC concepts contract years, the have triggered a reexamination of NASA Institute for optional plans for space missions as Advanced Concepts evidenced by the flow of additional (NIAC) has inspired funding by NASA and other agencies and nurtured a num- into NIAC concepts. ber of revolutionary advanced concepts NIAC actively seeks credible, technical that someday may have a significant controversy supported by an atmos- impact on future directions in aeronau- phere of open dialogue with the techni- tics and space. NIAC provides a path- cal community that encourages an way for revolutionary discoveries by examination of key technical issues. innovators with the ability for non-linear Interest in NIAC concepts by the tech- creativity to explore new possibilities for nical community continues to abound near and far term aerospace endeav- with numerous citations in the literature ors. The cornerstone of the NIAC of science publications, presentations process for inspiring new and revolu- (including some invited) in technical tionary thinking is the continuous exam- society meetings and acceptance of ination and articulation of “grand papers in refereed technical journals. visions” which encourage the technical community to set their sights beyond Please join the Universities Space current programs and explore new sys- Research Association (USRA) and tems, architectures and supporting NIAC in this exciting endeavor to help technologies that could revolutionize revolutionize the future of aeronautics long term plans as well as near term and space. missions. In this eighth year of operation by the Universities Space Research Assoc- iation, NIAC concepts have set new standards for performance in space- based observatories, advanced EVA Robert A. Cassanova, Ph.D. systems, radiation protection, in-space Director, NIAC propulsion systems, planetary explo- ration and support of humans on plane- 5 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 7 5 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR 8 NIAC STAFF 9 NIAC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 GRAND VISIONS 10 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 10 Summary 11 Call for Proposals CP 03-01 (Phase II) 11 Call for Proposals CP 05-01 (Phase I) 13 Call for Proposals CP 05-02 (Phase II) 13 Call for Proposals CP 06-01 (Phase I) 15 Call for Proposals CP 06-02 (Phase II) 16 Survey of Technologies to Enable NIAC Concepts 19 Coordination with NASA 22 Infusion of Advanced Concepts into NASA 24 Inspiration and Outreach 25 Release and Publicity of Calls for Proposals 27 Recruitment of Technically Diverse Peer Reviewers 27 NIAC Seventh Annual Meeting 30 NIAC Fellows Meeting 30 NIAC Science Council Meetings 30 NIAC Student Fellows Prize 32 NIAC Student Fellows Publications and Presentations 32 John McLucas Astronaut Safety Research Prize 32 Financial Performance 33 DESCRIPTION OF THE NIAC 33 NIAC Mission 34 Organization 35 Facilities 36 Virtual Institute 37 The NIAC Process 38 Solicitation 39 Proposals 40 Peer Review 40 NASA Concurrence 41 Awards 41 Management of Awards 6 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 7 42 PLANS FOR THE NINTH CONTRACT YEAR 43 Communication With The Technical Community And Articulation Of Grand Visions 44 Solicit And Select Concepts For Revolutionary Advanced Concepts 44 Continued Development Of Advanced Concepts 45 Oversight by USRA LIST OF TABLES 10 Table 1. Phase I and II Awards Performance Periods 11 Table 2. CP 03-01 Phase II Award Winners 12 Table 3. CP 05-01 Phase I Award Winners 13 Table 4. CP 05-02 Phase II Award Winners 13 Table 5. Summary of CP 06-01 Responding Organizations 14 Table 6. CP 06-01 Phase I Award Winners 15 Table 7. Summary of CP 06-02 Responding Organizations 15 Table 8. CP 06-02 Phase I Award Winners 16 Table 9. CP 02-01 Critical Enabling Technologies 17 Table 10. CP 03-01 Critical Enabling Technologies 18 Table 11. CP 05-02 Critical Enabling Technologies 19 Table 12. NASA - NIAC Support Team 20 Table 13. Visits and Contacts within NASA 23 Table 14. Advanced Concepts Infused Into NASA This Contract Year 31 Table 15. 2005-2006 NIAC Student Fellows Prize Winners 31 Table 16. 2006-2007 NIAC Student Fellows Prize Winners 35 Table 17. Current Membership of the NIAC Science Council 42 Table 18. Key Activities Planned for the Ninth Contract Year APPENDICES 46 A. Descriptions of Enabling Technologies from NIAC 61 B. CP 05-02 Awardees 64 C. CP 06-01 Awardees 70 D. CP 06-02 Awardees 74 E. Inspiration and Outreach Contacts 78 F. NIAC Publicity 91 G. 2005-2006 NIAC Fellows Publication Listing 7 TT hh ee NN II AA CC SS tt aa ff ff Robert Cassanova, Ph.D. Director Diana Jennings, Ph.D. Associate Director Ronald Turner, Ph.D. Senior Science Advisor Advanced Concepts Dale Little Operations Manager Robert Mitchell Network Engineer Institute for Katherine Reilly Publicalication Specialist NASA 8 N I A C 8 t h A n n u a l R e p o r t Executive Summary The NIAC is a unique organization where creativity attendees. In addition, invited keynote speakers gave and imagination, inspired by curiosity and the eternal thought-provoking presentations on space policy, cos- quest for knowledge, are necessities, not luxuries. mology, and advanced concepts in aeronautics and NIAC provides a process and a pathway for innova- alternative-technology transportation. tors with the ability for non-linear creativity to: (1) define grand visions for a future world of aeronautics In addition to these community-building meetings, and space, (2) explore the possibility of redefining NIAC hosted a one-day workshop as part of its ongo- realities of the future and (3) offer revolutionary solu- ing evolution of grand visions for aeronautics, space tions to the grand challenges of future aerospace science, and space exploration. The output of this endeavors. workshop and other Grand Visions activities was included in the CP 06-01 Call for Proposals released By operating as a virtual institute with succinct pro- in November 2005. posal requirements and efficient peer review, NIAC's mode of operation emphasizes a flexible and open NIAC's technical leadership continued its vigorous development of creative concepts with a minimum of activities for education, outreach and inspiration with technical direction. However, appropriate oversight presentations at universities, private industry and and nurturing is provided by NIAC's contractual man- technical society meetings. NIAC and NIAC spon- agement and technical leadership plus timely collab- sored advanced concepts received widespread oration with NASA's technical staff. recognition in the popular and technical press. NIAC Fellows were highly visible in technical society meet- During this eighth contract year, NIAC announced the ings with numerous presentations and publication of selection of 5 Phase II contracts totaling $2 million technical papers. Additionally, the NIAC Director and (with options), and 11 Phase I grants totaling $.8 mil- three of the NIAC's best-known fellows participated in lion. Since the beginning of the first NIAC contract, a special broadcast on Space Exploration through Feb. 1998, NIAC has received a total of 1,196 pro- Georgia Public Television for the MIT Forum. posals and has awarded 115 Phase I grants and 37 Phase II contracts for a total value of $24.5 million. In addition to inspiring proposals from the established The awards spanned all categories of businesses technical community, NIAC began a special program with 35% to universities, 52% to small businesses, to encourage undergraduate students who have the 7% to small and disadvantaged business, 1% to his- potential for extraordinary creativity and the ability to torically black colleges and universities and minority stretch well beyond typical undergraduate course institutions, 1% to national laboratories and 4% to work. The NIAC Student Fellows Prize (NSFP), spon- large businesses. During this eighth year of opera- sored by Universities Space Research Association tion, NIAC continued to meet the contract perform- and managed by NIAC, was initiated in 2005 to attract ance goals and, as in previous years, received an these students and facilitate their advanced aero- "excellent" rating from NASA in all categories of per- space concepts. Five students were selected in May formance. 2005 to receive a $9,000 one year grant and carried out their efforts during the 2005-2006 academic year. NIAC's method of open review of its advanced con- Five more were selected in May 2006 for the same cepts continued this year with a combination of open monetary award and length of research.
Recommended publications
  • Stairway to Heaven? Geographies of the Space Elevator in Science Fiction

    Stairway to Heaven? Geographies of the Space Elevator in Science Fiction

    ISSN 2624-9081 • DOI 10.26034/roadsides-202000306 Stairway to Heaven? Geographies of the Space Elevator in Science Fiction Oliver Dunnett Outer space is often presented as a kind of universal global commons – a space for all humankind, against which the hopes and dreams of humanity have been projected. Yet, since the advent of spaceflight, it has become apparent that access to outer space has been limited, shaped and procured in certain ways. Geographical approaches to the study of outer space have started to interrogate the ways in which such inequalities have emerged and sustained themselves, across environmental, cultural and political registers. For example, recent studies have understood outer space as increasingly foreclosed by certain state and commercial actors (Beery 2012), have emphasised narratives of tropical difference in understanding geosynchronous equatorial satellite orbits (Dunnett 2019) and, more broadly, have conceptualised the Solar System as part of Earth’s environment (Degroot 2017). It is clear from this and related literature that various types of infrastructure have been a significant part of the uneven geographies of outer space, whether in terms of long-established spaceports (Redfield 2000), anticipatory infrastructures (Gorman 2009) or redundant space hardware orbiting Earth as debris (Klinger 2019). collection no. 003 • Infrastructure on/off Earth Roadsides Stairway to Heaven? 43 Having been the subject of speculation in both engineering and science-fictional discourses for many decades, the space elevator has more recently been promoted as a “revolutionary and efficient way to space for all humanity” (ISEC 2017). The concept involves a tether lowered from a position in geostationary orbit to a point on Earth’s equator, along which an elevator can ascend and arrive in orbit.
  • SPEAKERS TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE 15TH ANNUAL John R

    SPEAKERS TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE 15TH ANNUAL John R

    15TH ANNUAL FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE SPEAKERS COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION http://www.faa.gov/go/ast 15-16 FEBRUARY 2012 HQ-12-0163.INDD John R. Allen Christine Anderson Dr. John R. Allen serves as the Program Executive for Crew Health Christine Anderson is the Executive Director of the New Mexico and Safety at NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, where he Spaceport Authority. She is responsible for the development oversees the space medicine activities conducted at the Johnson and operation of the first purpose-built commercial spaceport-- Space Center, Houston, Texas. Dr. Allen received a B.A. in Speech Spaceport America. She is a recently retired Air Force civilian Communication from the University of Maryland (1975), a M.A. with 30 years service. She was a member of the Senior Executive in Audiology/Speech Pathology from The Catholic University Service, the civilian equivalent of the military rank of General of America (1977), and a Ph.D. in Audiology and Bioacoustics officer. Anderson was the founding Director of the Space from Baylor College of Medicine (1996). Upon completion of Vehicles Directorate at the Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland his Master’s degree, he worked for the Easter Seals Treatment Air Force Base, New Mexico. She also served as the Director Center in Rockville, Maryland as an audiologist and speech- of the Space Technology Directorate at the Air Force Phillips language pathologist and received certification in both areas. Laboratory at Kirtland, and as the Director of the Military Satellite He joined the US Air Force in 1980, serving as Chief, Audiology Communications Joint Program Office at the Air Force Space at Andrews AFB, Maryland, and at the Wiesbaden Medical and Missile Systems Center in Los Angeles where she directed Center, Germany, and as Chief, Otolaryngology Services at the the development, acquisition and execution of a $50 billion Aeromedical Consultation Service, Brooks AFB, Texas, where portfolio.
  • NCKRI: 2012-2013 Annual Report

    NCKRI: 2012-2013 Annual Report

    The National Cave and Karst Research Institute (NCKRI) will be the world’s premier cave and karst research organization. NCKRI promotes and performs projects of national and international application, of the highest quality and integrity, through dedicated staff and partners. NCKRI is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation. It was created by the US Congress in 1998 in partnership with the National Park Service, State of New Mexico, and the City of Carlsbad. Federal and state funding for NCKRI is adminis- tered by the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technolo- gy (aka New Mexico Tech or NMT). Funds not produced by agreements through NMT are accepted directly by NCKRI. NCKRI’s enabling legislation, the National Cave and Karst Research Institute Act of 1998, 16 U.S.C. §4310, iden- tifies NCKRI’s mission as to: 1) further the science of speleology; 2) centralize and standardize speleological information; 3) foster interdisciplinary cooperation in cave and karst research programs; 4) promote public education; 5) promote national and international cooperation in pro- tecting the environment for the benefit of cave and karst landforms; and 6) promote and develop environmentally sound and sus- tainable resource management practices. NCKRI produced this publication as part of its annual Our 2011-12 Annual Report cover showed a speleothem reporting of activities. The reporting period covers NCKRI’s reported as destroyed. It still exists; a similar nearby speleo- fiscal year, from 1 July to 30 June of the following year. them had been destroyed. For reasons like this, NCKRI ar- Digital copies of this and previous reports are available for chives cave photos as historical and scientific records.
  • The Space Elevator NIAC Phase II Final Report March 1, 2003

    The Space Elevator NIAC Phase II Final Report March 1, 2003

    The Space Elevator NIAC Phase II Final Report March 1, 2003 Bradley C. Edwards, Ph.D. Eureka Scientific [email protected] The Space Elevator NIAC Phase II Final Report Executive Summary This document in combination with the book The Space Elevator (Edwards and Westling, 2003) summarizes the work done under a NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts Phase II grant to develop the space elevator. The effort was led by Bradley C. Edwards, Ph.D. and involved more than 20 institutions and 50 participants at some level. The objective of this program was to produce an initial design for a space elevator using current or near-term technology and evaluate the effort yet required prior to construction of the first space elevator. Prior to our effort little quantitative analysis had been completed on the space elevator concept. Our effort examined all aspects of the design, construction, deployment and operation of a space elevator. The studies were quantitative and detailed, highlighting problems and establishing solutions throughout. It was found that the space elevator could be constructed using existing technology with the exception of the high-strength material required. Our study has also found that the high-strength material required is currently under development and expected to be available in 2 years. Accepted estimates were that the space elevator could not be built for at least 300 years. Colleagues have stated that based on our effort an elevator could be operational in 30 to 50 years. Our estimate is that the space elevator could be operational in 15 years for $10B. In any case, our effort has enabled researchers and engineers to debate the possibility of a space elevator operating in 15 to 50 years rather than 300.
  • Iac-04-Iaa.3.8.3.07 the Lunar Space Elevator

    Iac-04-Iaa.3.8.3.07 the Lunar Space Elevator

    IAC-04-IAA.3.8.3.07 THE LUNAR SPACE ELEVATOR Jerome Pearson, Eugene Levin, John Oldson, and Harry Wykes STAR Inc., Mount Pleasant, SC USA; [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper examines lunar space elevators, a concept originated by the lead author, for lunar development. Lunar space elevators are flexible structures connecting the lunar surface with counterweights located beyond the L1 or L2 Lagrangian points in the Earth- moon system. A lunar space elevator on the moon’s near side, balanced about the L1 Lagrangian point, could support robotic climbing vehicles to release lunar material into high Earth orbit. A lunar space elevator on the moon’s far side, balanced about L2, could provide nearly continuous communication with an astronomical observatory on the moon’s far side, away from the optical and radio interference from the Earth. Because of the lower mass of the moon, such lunar space elevators could be constructed of existing materials instead of carbon nanotubes, and would be much less massive than the Earth space elevator. We review likely spots for development of lunar surface operations (south pole locations for water and continuous sunlight, and equatorial locations for lower delta-V), and examine the likely payload requirements for Earth-to-moon and moon-to-Earth transportation. We then examine its capability to launch large amounts of lunar material into high Earth orbit, and do a top-level system analysis to evaluate the potential payoffs of lunar space elevators. SPACE ELEVATOR HISTORY The idea of a "stairway to heaven" is as as the rotation period of the body.
  • First International Planetary Cave Research Workshop : Implications for Astrobiology, Climate, Detection, and Exploration, Octob

    First International Planetary Cave Research Workshop : Implications for Astrobiology, Climate, Detection, and Exploration, Octob

    Program and Abstract Volume LPI Contribution No. 1640 First International Planetary Caves Workshop IMPLICATIONS FOR ASTROBIOLOGY, CLIMATE, DETECTION, AND EXPLORATION October 25–28, 2011 • Carlsbad, New Mexico Sponsors U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Astrogeology Science Center Universities Space Research Association (USRA)/Lunar and Planetary Institute (LPI) National Cave and Karst Research Institute NASA Mars Program Office Conveners Timothy N. Titus U.S. Geological Survey Penelope J. Boston New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology/National Cave and Karst Research Institute Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 1640 Compiled in 2011 by Meeting and Publication Services Lunar and Planetary Institute USRA Houston 3600 Bay Area Boulevard, Houston TX 77058-1113 The Lunar and Planetary Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under a cooperative agreement with the Science Mission Directorate of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. Abstracts in this volume may be cited as Author A. B. (2011) Title of abstract. In First International Planetary Caves Workshop: Implications for Astrobiology, Climate, Detection, and Exploration, p. XX. LPI Contribution No. 1640, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. ISSN No.

  • Today's Space Elevator

    International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2019-1 Today's Space Elevator Space Elevator Matures into the Galactic Harbour A Primer for Progress in Space Elevator Development Peter Swan, Ph.D. Michael Fitzgerald ii Today's Space Elevator Space Elevator Matures into the Galactic Harbour Peter Swan, Ph.D. Michael Fitzgerald Prepared for the International Space Elevator Consortium Chief Architect's Office Sept 2019 iii iv Today's Space Elevator Copyright © 2019 by: Peter Swan Michael Fitzgerald International Space Elevator Consortium All rights reserved, including the rights to reproduce this manuscript or portions thereof in any form. Published by Lulu.com [email protected] 978-0-359-93496-6 Cover Illustrations: Front – with permission of Galactic Harbour Association. Back – with permission of Michael Fitzgerald. Printed in the United States of America v vi Preface The Space Elevator is a Catalyst for Change! There was a moment in time that I realized the baton had changed hands - across three generations. I was talking within a small but enthusiastic group of attendees at the International Space Development Conference in June 2019. On that stage there was generation "co-inventor" Jerome Pearson, generation "advancing concept" Michael Fitzgerald and generation "excited students" James Torla and Souvik Mukherjee. The "moment" was more than an assembly of young and old. It was also a portrait of the stewards of the Space Elevator revolution -- from Inventor to Developer to Innovators. James was working a college research project on how to get to Mars in 77 days from the Apex Anchor and Souvik (16 years old) was representing his high school from India.
  • Scientists Debate Gaia : the Next Century / Edited by Stephen H

    Scientists Debate Gaia : the Next Century / Edited by Stephen H

    Scientists Debate Gaia The Next Century edited by Stephen H. Schneider, James R. Miller, Eileen Crist, and Penelope J. Boston foreword by Pedro Ruiz Torres introductions by James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis Scientists Debate Gaia Scientists on Gaia, edited by Stephen H. Schneider and Penelope J. Boston (MIT Press, 1991) and Scientists Debate Gaia: The Next Century, edited by Stephen H. Schneider, James R. Miller, Eileen Crist, and Penelope J. Boston (MIT Press, 2004) originated respectively with the First Chapman Conference on the Gaia Hypothesis (San Diego, California), sponsored by the American Geophysical Union, and the Second Chapman Conference on the Gaia Hypothesis (Valencia, Spain), sponsored by the American Geophysical Union and the University of Valencia. Scientists Debate Gaia The Next Century edited by Stephen H. Schneider, James R. Miller, Eileen Crist, and Penelope J. Boston The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 6 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Times New Roman on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scientists debate gaia : the next century / edited by Stephen H. Schneider . [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0-262-19498-8 (alk. paper) 1. Gaia hypothesis. I. Schneider, Stephen Henry. QH331.S324 2004 577—dc22 2003061532 10 987654321 Contents Foreword by Pedro Ruiz Torres xi Preface xiii Reflections on Gaia 1 James Lovelock Gaia by Any Other Name 7 Lynn Margulis I PRINCIPLES AND PROCESSES 1 Clarifying Gaia: Regulation with or without Natural Selection 15 Timothy M.
  • CV C. Stoker Page 1 of 8

    CV C. Stoker Page 1 of 8

    CV C. Stoker Page 1 of 8 Curriculum Vitae Carol R. Stoker M.S. 245-3 NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA 94035 (650) 604-6490 carol.r.stoker@ nasa.gov Education: B.S. 1976, Physics (Cum Laude), University of Utah, Salt Lake City Ph.D. 1983, Dept. of Astrogeophysics, University of Colorado, Boulder Positions Held: 1986-Present: Staff Research Scientist, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA. 1985-1986: National Research Council Fellow, NASA Ames Research Center. 1984-1985: Fellow of Advanced Studies Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research. 1979-1983: Research Associate, Laboratory of Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder. Specializations: • Life in extreme environments as analogs for extraterrestrial life, most recent work has focused on subsurface life. • Developing the science rational, methodology, and technology to search for extraterrestrial life. • Lead for numerous field experiments in extreme space analog environments involving interdisciplinary teams of engineers and scientists. • Virtual Reality information systems for remote robot operations and data analysis. • Analysis and modeling of multispectral imaging data to understand planetary atmospheres and surfaces. • Meteorology, cloud structure, cloud physics and moist convection on the outer planets. • Scientific, engineering, and operations aspects of human planetary exploration. Relevant Experience: • 2007- present: Principle Investigator of Ice-Ax (Innovative Partnerships Office) Manage interdisciplinary team to test an integrated payload for future drilling mission to Mars ($250K NASA funding matched by $1M partner contributions; 1 yr. task). • 2003-present: Principle Investigator and project lead, MARTE project to search for subsurface biosphere in a Mars analog site and to develop/test a robotic drilling platform for Mars ($6M, funded through NASA ASTEP program).
  • Toward Innovation Creation for Space Activities

    Toward Innovation Creation for Space Activities

    QUARTERLY REVIEW No.35 /April 2010 6 Toward Innovation Creation for Space Activities TAKAFUMI SHIMIZU Monodzukuri Technology, Infrastructure and Frontier Research Unit terminated thereafter. 1 Introduction Launch costs of rockets, which are the only space transportation systems currently available, are on Science fiction writer Arthur C. Clark has made the order of 10,000 dollars per kilogram. Since an future science and technology predictions, and Table artificial satellite is required to be rigid to withstand 1 describes those predictions of him that concern the severe rocket launch environment as well as to be space activities.[1] The recent emergence of carbon lightweight because of the expensive rocket launch nanotubes, which are very strong and light, has raised cost, and furthermore since it is required to be highly the possibility of developing the space elevator listed reliable and to have a long design-life because its on- in the table’s first column, and it is predicted that the orbit maintenance and repair are impractical, the elevator would come true around 2050 according to satellite itself is inevitably expensive. the nanotechnology field of the technology strategy On the other hand, there is an argument that by map 2009 published by the New Energy and introducing not mere improvements of existing proven Industrial Technology Development Organization technologies, but totally new concepts that are not (NEDO), a Japanese independent administrative illogical and absurd empty theories but are based on agency.[2] Demands for the space guard listed in the sound physical principles, space activities with far less second column have always been high.
  • Space Elevators Are the Transportation Story of 21 Century

    Space Elevators Are the Transportation Story of 21 Century

    International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-2 Space Elevators are the Transportation Story of 21st Century Peter Swan, Ph.D., Cathy Swan, Ph.D. Michael Fitzgerald, Matthew Peet, Ph.D., James Torla Vern Hall Appropriate Architecture A Primer for Progress in Space Elevator Development International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-2 ii Space Elevators are the Transportation Story of the 21st Century Peter Swan, Ph.D. Cathy Swan, Ph.D. Michael Fitzgerald Matthew Peet, Ph.D. James Torla Vern Hall Prepared for the International Space Elevator Consortium July 2020 International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-2 Space Elevators are the Transportation Story of the 21st Century Copyright © 2020 by: Peter Swan International Space Elevator Consortium All rights reserved, including the rights to reproduce this manuscript or portions thereof in any form. Published by Lulu.com [email protected] 978-1-71674-663-5 Cover Illustrations: Front – Amelia Stanton Back – Peter Swan Printed in the United States of America iii International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-2 iv International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-2 Preface A Network of Space Elevators enables humankind’s movement off of Planet Earth Elon Musk has stated he needs one million metric tonnes of supplies delivered to his colony on Mars.1 In addition, the leadership of the Space Solar Power satellite constellation has stated they need five million metric tonnes delivered to Geosynchronous orbit.2 Meanwhile, the European led Moon Village Association has stated they need "quite a lot of mass" delivered to the surface of the Moon to ensure a successful development for the gathering of people and missions.
  • Removing Debris in Space by Jerome Pearson, Ohio Eta ’61

    Removing Debris in Space by Jerome Pearson, Ohio Eta ’61

    The ElectroDynamic Debris Eliminator (EDDE): Removing Debris in Space by Jerome Pearson, Ohio Eta ’61 pace is littered with debris far more dangerous than the litter on our highways, and it’s getting worse. Figure 1 is an artist’s con- scept of the junk in low Earth orbit (LEO). These thousands of pieces of space junk pose risks to our space assets such as communication and navigation satellites, environmental monitoring satellites, the Hubble Space Telescope, and the Interna- tional Space Station (ISS). More importantly, they pose a risk to astronauts who work in the space station or repair the Hubble, as the space shuttle Atlantis astro- nauts did last year. In addition to the bad camera and failing gyros, Hubble’s solar array had a hole in it the size of a .22-caliber bullet. Most highway debris is paper and plastic, but there are occasional tire treads and hubcaps that require drivers to take evasive maneuvers. Similarly, the ISS and the space shuttles occasionally have to jog their orbits to avoid known pieces of space junk. The U.S. Strategic Com- mand tracks about 21,000 pieces of debris larger than 10 cm, and there are an estimated 300,000 pieces larger than 1 cm (about a .38-caliber Figure 1. There are about 2,500 pieces of junk in low Earth orbit larger than 2 kg, which bullet). These bullets and hubcaps represent a threat to satellites, astronauts, and the International Space Station. (NASA Image) (and the occasional bus or spent upper stage) can hit satellites with relative speeds of 5-10 satellite, Fenyung 1-C.