Scientists Debate Gaia
The Next Century
edited by Stephen H. Schneider, James R. Miller, Eileen Crist, and Penelope J. Boston
foreword by Pedro Ruiz Torres
introductions by James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis Scientists Debate Gaia Scientists on Gaia, edited by Stephen H. Schneider and Penelope J. Boston (MIT Press, 1991) and Scientists Debate Gaia: The Next Century, edited by Stephen H. Schneider, James R. Miller, Eileen Crist, and Penelope J. Boston (MIT Press, 2004) originated respectively with the First Chapman Conference on the Gaia Hypothesis (San Diego, California), sponsored by the American Geophysical Union, and the Second Chapman Conference on the Gaia Hypothesis (Valencia, Spain), sponsored by the American Geophysical Union and the University of Valencia. Scientists Debate Gaia The Next Century
edited by Stephen H. Schneider, James R. Miller, Eileen Crist, and Penelope J. Boston
The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 6 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher.
This book was set in Times New Roman on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong. Printed and bound in the United States of America.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Scientists debate gaia : the next century / edited by Stephen H. Schneider . . . [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0-262-19498-8 (alk. paper) 1. Gaia hypothesis. I. Schneider, Stephen Henry.
QH331.S324 2004 577—dc22 2003061532
10 987654321 Contents
Foreword by Pedro Ruiz Torres xi Preface xiii Reflections on Gaia 1 James Lovelock Gaia by Any Other Name 7 Lynn Margulis
I PRINCIPLES AND PROCESSES
1 Clarifying Gaia: Regulation with or without Natural Selection 15 Timothy M. Lenton
2 Gaia Is Life in a Wasteworld of By-products 27 Tyler Volk
3 Models and Geophysiological Hypotheses 37 Arthur C. Petersen
4 Gaia: Toward a Thermodynamics of Life 45 Eric D. Schneider
5 Gaia, Extended Organisms, and Emergent Homeostasis 57 J. Scott Turner vi Contents
6 Homeostatic Gaia: An Ecologist’s Perspective on the Possibility of Regulation 71 David Wilkinson
II EARTH HISTORY AND CYCLES
7 Phosphorus, a Servant Faithful to Gaia? Biosphere Remediation Rather Than Regulation 79 Karl B. Fo¨llmi, Federica Tamburini, Rachel Hosein, Bas van de Schootbrugge, Kaspar Arn, and Claire Rambeau
8 Self-Regulation of Ocean Composition by the Biosphere 93 Lee R. Kump
9 A New Biogeochemical Earth System Model for the Phanerozoic Eon 101 Noam M. Bergman, Timothy M. Lenton, and Andrew J. Watson
10 Gaia and Glaciation: Lipalian (Vendian) Environmental Crisis 115 Mark A. S. McMenamin
11 Does Life Drive Disequilibrium in the Biosphere? 129 David Schwartzman and Tyler Volk
12 Biotic Plunder: Control of the Environment by Biological Exhaustion of Resources 137 Toby Tyrrell vii Contents
III PHILOSOPHY, HISTORY, AND HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF GAIA
13 Gaia: The Living Earth—2,500 Years of Precedents in Natural Science and Philosophy 151 Bruce Scofield
14 Concerned with Trifles? A Geophysiological Reading of Charles Darwin’s Last Book 161 Eileen Crist
15 Gradient Reduction Theory: Thermodynamics and the Purpose of Life 173 Dorion Sagan and Jessica Hope Whiteside
16 Gaia and Complexity 187 Lee F. Klinger
17 Gaia and Observer Self-selection 201 Andrew J. Watson
18 Taming Gaia: The History of the Dutch Lowlands as an Analogy to Global Change 211 Peter Westbroek
19 Gaia and the Human Species 223 Crispin Tickell viii Contents
IV QUANTIFYING GAIA
20 Daisyworld Homeostasis and the Earth System 231 S. L. Weber and J. M. Robinson
21 Salvaging the Daisyworld Parable under the Dynamic Area Fraction Framework 241 K. M. Nordstrom, V. K. Gupta, and T. N. Chase
22 Food Web Complexity Enhances Ecological and Climatic Stability in a Gaian Ecosystem Model 255 Stephan P. Harding
23 Gaia in the Machine: The Artificial Life Approach 267 Keith Downing
24 On Causality and Ice Age Deglaciations 281 Alexandre Casanovas and Vicent Go´mez
25 Amazonian Biogeography as a Test for Gaia 291 Axel Kleidon
26 Modeling Feedbacks between Water and Vegetation in the North African Climate System 297 James R. Miller and Gary L. Russell ix Contents
V LIFE FORMS AND GAIA: MICROBES TO EXTRATERRESTRIALS
27 Extraterrestrial Gaias 309 S. Franck, W. von Bloh, C. Bounama, and H.-J. Schellnhuber
28 The Tinto River, an Extreme Gaian Environment 321 Felipe Go´mez, David Ferna´ndez-Remolar, Elena Gonza´lez-Toril, and Ricardo Amils
29 Climate and the Amazon—a Gaian System? 335 Peter Bunyard
30 On the Co-evolution of Life and Its Environment 343 S. A. L. M. Kooijman
31 Stability and Instability in Ecological Systems: Gaia Theory and Evolutionary Biology 353 Francesco Santini and Lodovico Galleni
Appendix: Studying Gaia: The NASA Planetary Biology Internship (PBI) Program 363
List of Contributors 365 Index 369
Foreword
The University of Valencia, on the Mediterranean coast of Spain, was founded in 1499 by the Council of the City. After five centuries of development that included periods of intellectual glory and of scholastic obscurity, our university has become a modern European institution. We now celebrate our clear interests in higher educa- tion and cultural activism. We enjoy active scholarly, scientific, and other research. During the period 1999–2002, we organized artistic and other programs to com- memorate our five centuries. We published this program, Cinc Segles (Five Cen- turies) in our own language, Valencian (valenciano), our way to speak Catala´n. This publication, a beautifully produced volume that dealt with history, sports, art, music, and other aspects of the university’s heritage, was the main focus of our attention at the festival celebrating our five-hundredth year. One of the most compelling events that occurred after the book was printed was the Second Chapman Conference on the Gaia Hypothesis, Gaia—2000. We held this international meeting at our world famous botanical garden on the summer solstice of 2000. As a secular scientific institution, our university provided a perfect backdrop to this important scientific congress. The call for papers sponsored by the American Geophysical Union (AGU) led to participation that filled the botanical garden’s spanking new auditorium and its state-of-the-art audiovisual facilities with world- class science. The coincidence of our five-hundredth anniversary with this meeting, twelve years after the first Chapman Conference, held in 1988 at San Diego, Cali- fornia, provided excellent opportunity for collaboration between AGU and our uni- versity. It led to this book, a forum for discussion of the frontier science of Gaia theory and practice. In retrospect, the Gaia—2000 conference was not only a remark- able local scientific success but also extended far beyond Spain, Europe, and the United States. The lively debate attracted coverage in the Spanish press. The presence in Valencia of scientists such as Dr. James E. Lovelock from the United Kingdom and Dr. Andrei Lapo of the Geological Institute of St. Petersburg, as spokesman for Vladimir Vernadsky’s (1863–1945) work, was a privilege for our city and university. This book, as the most tangible result of the meeting, presents outstanding docu- mentation of current international scientific views on Gaia theory. Finally, I wish to recognize the e¤orts of institutions and persons, among the many that made Gaia—2000 possible in Valencia. The AGU, the U.S. National Science Foundation, the Caja de Ahorros del Mediterra´neo, the Generalitat Valenciana, the Ajuntament de Vale`ncia, and the Comisio´n Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologı´a were the main sponsors. I also acknowledge the contributions of the former Vice Rector of Culture, the biochemist Dr. Juli Pereto´;the former Vice Rector of Re- search, the theoretical chemist Dr. Francisco Toma´s; the former Botanical Garden Director, Dr. Manuel Costa; and the indefatigable organizer, the botanist (lichen- ologist) and the President of the local organizing committee, Professor Eva Barreno. Last but not least, Professor Lynn Margulis’s enthusiastic support made it possible for us to host this seminal scientific meeting here in Valencia.
Dr. Pedro Ruiz Torres, Rector University of Valencia, 1994–2002
Preface
A scientific and intellectual question of fundamental importance to the Earth sciences is the formative role of life in the biosphere’s biogeochemical cycles and climate. The Gaia hypothesis, introduced in the early 1970s by English atmospheric chemist Jim Lovelock and American biologist Lynn Margulis, proposes that the interaction be- tween the biota and the physical-chemical environment is large enough in scope to serve as an active feedback mechanism for biogeoclimatologic control. The core of Gaian theory is that life has a substantial, even regulating, impact on the Earth’s geochemical cycles and climate—an impact that tends to favor organisms and living processes. This view has met with vocal criticism from both the Earth sciences and the life sciences. Geochemical arguments have been proposed to explain many envi- ronmental changes over time without recourse to the role of life. And biologists, especially neo-Darwinians, have argued that the Earth understood as a global eco- system actively ‘‘managing’’ environmental parameters for the benefit of life as a whole is incompatible with the view of living organisms as competitively and selfishly inclined toward narrowly definable survival and reproductive success. The possibility of active climatic regulation systems, and the relative importance of feedback processes between organic and inorganic components, clearly needed to be examined in a frank, scientifically rigorous, and richly interdisciplinary setting. To that end the first American Geophysical Union Chapman Conference on the Gaia hypothesis was held in San Diego, California, in 1988. Many of the papers pre- sented at that conference appeared in the book Scientists on Gaia, edited by Stephen Schneider and Penelope Boston. Twelve years later a second Chapman Conference on the Gaia hypothesis was held in Valencia, Spain. Most of the chapters in this volume are based on presentations given there. Why was it important to hold a second AGU Chapman Conference on the Gaia hypothesis, and why is it necessary to publish this second volume? Prior to the 1988 conference, Gaia had been highly controversial within scientific arenas, yet there was little scientific debate. Controversy occurred for at least three reasons: (1) there was outright hostility to the name ‘‘Gaia’’ (a goddess of the Earth metaphor, implying the Earth was alive); (2) there was little or no shared understanding (or even a consistent definition) of the ‘‘Gaia hypothesis’’; and (3) studying Gaia required strong multi- disciplinary training and an interdisciplinary commitment that transcended tradi- tional scientific approaches. The first conference extended the Gaia hypothesis into the mainstream of scientific thinking and debate, and encouraged scientists to work within the field. Major progress in defining and identifying ‘‘Gaian’’ processes was made, inconsistencies were flagged, and new thinking about the coupling of physi- cal and biological systems was o¤ered. Nevertheless, controversies about Gaia still abound today—and many are debated in this volume. Happily, the evolution of in- terdisciplinary science into the mainstream and the ongoing development of Earth system science have promoted scientific inquiry seeking and elucidating Gaian—and non-Gaian—mechanisms within the Earth system. xiv Preface
Borrowing from philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn’s classical analysis, we could say that Gaia is exiting its ‘‘revolutionary’’ phase—of vociferous controversy and ostracism from the scientific establishment—and is entering its phase of ‘‘nor- mal,’’ puzzle-solving science. More often, today, the expression ‘‘Gaian science’’ is used in the literature in lieu of the older ‘‘Gaia hypothesis.’’ However, along with the evolution to Gaian science has come a sharper focus on what is ‘‘controlled’’—or not controlled—and by what processes. Moreover, the open exchanges have helped to correct much of the loose language and soft definitions from early days of the debate, and thus Earth science has been enriched by a decade and a half of Gaian science activities. The three interlinked themes of the Valencia conference were Gaia in time, the role of the biota in regulating biogeochemical cycles and climate, and understanding complexity and feedbacks in the Earth system. The Earth system is dynamic and evolving, yet Gaia can provide stability for long periods of time while undergoing changes in response to external stimuli and/or emerging components within the biota. The biogeochemical cycles of the principal elements of life are intertwined. To un- derstand how they work in the present, have worked in the past, are being modified by human activity, and may change in the future requires several approaches, including the analysis of the geological record, the use of models of varying com- plexity and realism, and the empirical study of ecosystems, with special emphasis on the formative impact of life on nonliving processes, such as climate, composition of the atmosphere, and cycling of elements. To address Gaia requires articulating broad themes, in combination with specific questions, that can be scientifically investigated. Three such themes relate to the temporal variability of Gaia, the structure of Gaia, and how to quantify Gaian feedbacks. These can be further divided into clusters of questions that are addressed in the volume: