DOCSLIB.ORG

Technology and Innovation Centres

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technology and Innovation Centres House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Technology and Innovation Centres Second Report of Session 2010–11 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 15 December 2010, 12 January 2011, and 2 February 2011 Published on 17 February 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Government Office for Science and associated public bodies. Current membership Andrew Miller (Labour, Ellesmere Port and Neston) (Chair) Gavin Barwell (Conservative, Croydon Central) Gregg McClymont (Labour, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative, South Basildon and East Thurrock) David Morris (Conservative, Morecambe and Lunesdale) Stephen Mosley (Conservative, City of Chester) Pamela Nash (Labour, Airdrie and Shotts) Jonathan Reynolds (Labour/Co-operative, Stalybridge and Hyde) Alok Sharma (Conservative, Reading West) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat, Brecon and Radnorshire) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/science. A list of reports from the Committee in this Parliament is included at the back of this volume. The Reports of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in printed volume(s). Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are: Glenn McKee (Clerk); Ed Beale (Second Clerk); Farrah Bhatti (Committee Specialist); Xameerah Malik (Committee Specialist); Andy Boyd (Senior Committee Assistant); Julie Storey (Committee Assistant); Pam Morris (Committee Assistant), Jim Hudson (Committee Support Assistant); and Becky Jones (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Science and Technology Committee, Committee Office, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general inquiries is: 020 7219 2793; the Committee’s e- mail address is: [email protected] List of additional written evidence (published in Volume II on the Committee’s website www.parliament.uk/science) Page 1 Loughborough University (TIC 01) Ev w1 2 Edinburgh Instruments Ltd (TIC 02) Ev w2 3 University of Bath (TIC 03) Ev w3 4 Birmingham City University (TIC 04) Ev w6 5 University of Leeds (TIC 05 and 05a) Ev w7, Ev w10 6 Durham University (TIC 06) Ev w11 7 Scottish Agricultural College (TIC 07) Ev w13 8 Professor Marc Desmulliez (TIC 08) Ev w14 9 Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester (TIC 09) Ev w15 10 Manufacturing Technology Centre, University of Nottingham (TIC 10) Ev w19 11 National Physical Laboratory (TIC 11) Ev w21 12 National Nuclear Laboratory and Dalton Nuclear Institute, University of Manchester (TIC 13) Ev w24 13 National Renewable Energy Centre Ltd (trading as Narec) (TIC 14) Ev w27 14 Professor Lord Bhattacharyya (TIC 15) Ev w29 15 UK Business Incubation (TIC 16) Ev w31 16 DREM Ventures Ltd, Optropreneurs Ltd, Pinacl Solutions UK Ltd and Grounded Innovation Ltd (TIC 17) Ev w32 17 Professor Peter Dobson (TIC 18) Ev w37 18 Centre for Business Research, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge (TIC 19) Ev w38 19 Smith Institute for Industrial Mathematics and System Engineering (TIC 20) Ev w45 20 University College London (TIC 21) Ev w48 21 Kingston University (TIC 22) Ev w51 22 University of Lancaster (TIC 23) Ev w53 23 University of Liverpool (TIC 24) Ev w55 24 University of Strathclyde (TIC 25) Ev w59 25 University of Warwick (TIC 26) Ev w60 26 Professor Andy Hopper (TIC 27) Ev w66 27 Research Councils UK (TIC 29) Ev w68 28 UK Computing Research Committee (TIC 30) Ev w69 29 Professor L Gladden, University of Cambridge, and Professor D Begg, Imperial College London (TIC 31) Ev w71 30 University of Edinburgh (TIC 32) Ev w74 31 Brunel University (TIC 33) Ev w77 32 University of the Arts London (TIC 36) Ev w79 33 Universities Scotland (TIC 38) Ev w80 34 University Alliance (TIC 39) Ev w85 35 University of Sheffield and University of Sheffield’s AMRC with Boeing (TIC 40) Ev w88 36 HDR Architecture (TIC 41) Ev w90 37 Imperial College London (TIC 42) Ev w92 38 University of Bristol (TIC 43) Ev w95 39 PraxisUnico (TIC 44) Ev w99 40 N8 Research Partnership (TIC 45) Ev w104 41 Maddison Product Design (TIC 46) Ev w105 42 Royal Society of Chemistry (TIC 47) Ev w108 43 Health Protection Agency (TIC 48) Ev w111 44 National Composites Centre (TIC 49) Ev w112 45 Food and Environment Research Agency (TIC 50) Ev w116 46 Industrial Strategic Advisory Board of the University of Bristol and Bath University Systems Centre (TIC 51) Ev w117 47 Chemistry Innovation Knowledge Transfer Network (TIC 52) Ev w119 48 United Kingdom Science Park Association (TIC 53) Ev w121 49 The Media Institute (TIC 55) Ev w122 50 The Work Foundation (TIC 56) Ev w125 51 TWI Ltd (TIC 57) Ev w129 52 Harper Adams University College, Newport (TIC 58) Ev w132 53 University of Leicester (TIC 59) Ev w136 54 Surrey Research Park, University of Surrey (TIC 60) Ev w137 55 LGC Ltd (TIC 61) Ev w138 56 University of Plymouth (TIC 62) Ev w140 57 One North East (TIC 63) Ev w142 58 Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (TIC 64) Ev w146 59 Cancer Research UK (TIC 65) Ev w147 60 Loughborough University (TIC 68) Ev w151 61 The Russell Group (TIC 69) Ev w153 62 The Biochemical Society (TIC 70) Ev w161 63 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (TIC 71) Ev w166 64 General Electric (TIC 72) Ev w170 65 Cambridge 100 Group (TIC 73) Ev w174 66 Plastic Electronics leadership Group (TIC 74) Ev w175 67 Sciovis Ltd (TIC 75) Ev w177 68 The Knowledge Centre for Materials Chemistry (TIC 76) Ev w178 69 BIA Regenerative Medicine Industry Group (TIC 78) Ev w181 70 Technical Strategy Advisory Group (TIC 79) Ev w191 71 Design Council (TIC 80) Ev w197 72 Institution of Chemical Engineers (TIC 81) Ev w200 73 C-Tech Innovation Ltd (TIC 83) Ev w206 74 Business and Innovation and Science Boards, Institute of Physics (TIC 84) Ev w207 75 Retail Asset and Deposit Products, Barclays Bank (TIC 85) Ev w210 76 Icon Medical Technology Development (TIC 37) Ev w211 cobber Pack: U PL: CWE1 [SO] Processed: [11-02-2011 15:21] Job: 007516 Unit: PG01 Science and Technology Committee: Evidence Ev w1 Written evidence Written evidence submitted by Loughborough University (TIC 01) Declaration of Interest I am Head of the Wolfson School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at Loughborough University. We lead the Manufacturing Technology Centre’s (MTC) strand in Intelligent Automation, and have recently submitted a bid for an EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in the field of Intelligent Automation. We are keen to pursue a Fraunhofer-type TIC (‘Maxwell Centre’), either alone, or in partnership with Fraunhofer IPA, with whom we have had a partnership exploration for the past two years, seeking a funding model. We have worked with IPA several times in EU Framework programmes. We see TICs as having a more SME-focused and multi-sectoral impact when compared to the MTC, especially for relatively young or start- up companies. We believe there would be synergy and complementarities between a Loughborough-based TIC in Advanced Manufacturing, and the MTC. 1. What is the Fraunhofer model and would it be applicable to the UK? 1.1 As I understand it the Fraunhofer centres are not-for-profit organisations with permanent staff, offering applied research and development services. The funding model is (nominally) 1/3 from direct government funding, 1/3 from RTD projects (grant from government or EU under peer review) and 1/3 commercial activity (direct industry funding). The proportions sometimes vary (eg 40%, 20%, 40%); the essential key feature being that government funding is more than matched by industry funding. Thus government funding complements success in gaining contracts from industry. 1.2 I see no reason why this model would not be viable in the UK. The major stumbling block is the absence of long-term (>5 years) government funding to underpin applied R&D in key sectors, i.e. funding akin to QR in universities, but focused on topics of interest to industry. Without such funding it may be difficult to survive, especially during a “start-up” phase. The core difference between TICs and university-led technology transfer is that universities secure projects and then recruit research staff; TICs would have core staff seeking projects, and thus one can keep the key skills in place. As noted by Hermann Hauser, there is potentially great synergy in coupling TICs with leading university research groups, which would channel new TRL 1–3 ideas into the TIC. Within the TIC, TRL 4–6 activity (TSB or EU-funded projects) would develop key technologies for TRL 7–9 adaptation (industry funded) and exploitation by individual companies, ie a direct route for research impacts to industry. 2. Are there existing Fraunhofer-type research centres within the UK, and if so, are they effective? 2.1 To the best of my knowledge there are no comparable centres. Universities generally have some sort of Technology Transfer activity, but project-based rather than key staff driven.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Research Programme 1995-2008
    Review of the Defra Biodiversity Research Programme 1995-2008 28 and 29 September 2009 Innovation Centre, Reading VENUE AND HOTEL LOCATION DETAILS Royal County Hotel Review Meeting Venue: INNOVATION CENTRE, READING 5th Floor, Northgate House, 21 - 23 Valpy Street, Reading, RG1 1AR, Tel: 0118 955 7800 There are a limited number of parking spaces available at the Innovation Centre. If you need to reserve a car parking space please phone 0118 955 7800 or e-mail [email protected] If you are traveling by car you may wish to use Reading’s Park & Ride facilities http://www.parkandride.net/reading/reading_frameset.html Information for other Reading car parks can be found at http://www.city- visitor.com/reading/carparks.html • Directions from Reading Railway Station (5 minutes walk from Innovation Centre) • Exit the platforms via the main barriers. If you arrive on platforms 5-9, you will need to go over the bridge and down the escalator. The Railair exit is closest to the Centre. • Railair exit (by station M&S) go down the stairs and cross over the Railair pick up and then cross at the traffic lights. Turn left towards roundabout then right into Blagrave Street. Immediately cross over the road towards Aldwych House. Continue up Blagrave Street taking the first left into Valpy Street. The Innovation Centre at North Gate House is the last building on left hand side. i • Main exit (by station WHSmiths) – If you leave the station here (no stairs), you will exit onto Station Hill. Turn left and skirt the outside of the Station, you will pass the Railair pick up, then see instructions above.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA-RETD Rewind Offshore
    Comparative Analysis of International Offshore Wind Energy Development REWIND OFFSHORE March 2017 ABOUT THE IEA RETD TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATION PROGRAMME The IEA Renewable Energy Technology Deployment Technology Collaboration Programme (IEA RETD TCP) provides a platform for enhancing international cooperation on policies, measures and market instruments to accelerate the global deployment of renewable energy technologies. IEA RETD TCP aims to empower policy makers and energy market actors to make informed decisions by: (1) providing innovative policy options; (2) disseminating best practices related to policy measures and market instruments to increase deployment of renewable energy, and (3) increasing awareness of the short-, medium- and long-term impacts of renewable energy action and inaction. For further information please visit: http://iea-retd.org or contact [email protected]. Twitter: @IEA_RETD IEA RETD TCP is part of the IEA Energy Technology Network. DISCLAIMER The IEA RETD TCP, formally known as the Technology Collaboration Programme for Renewable Energy Technology Deployment and formerly known as the Implementing Agreement for Renewable Energy Technology Deployment (IEA-RETD), functions within a Framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IEA RETD TCP do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual Member Countries. COPYRIGHT This publication should be cited as: IEA RETD TCP (2017), Comparative Analysis of International Offshore Wind Energy Development (REWind Offshore), IEA Renewable Energy Technology Deployment Technology Collaboration Programme (IEA RETD TCP), Utrecht, 2017. Copyright © IEA RETD TCP 2017 (Stichting Foundation Renewable Energy Technology Deployment) AUTHORS Lead Authors: The Carbon Trust is an independent, expert partner that works with public and private section organizations around the world, helping them to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science
    Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science: Other responses Contents-Other responses Organisation Name Response Type ACPO Substantive Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Substantive Analytical Services International Ltd Response on behalf of Analytical Services International Ltd both as an academic researcher and a forensic service provider Association of Forensic Service Providers' Body Substantive Fluid Forum CCL Forensics Substantive Cellmark Forensic Services Substantive Crown Prosecution Service Substantive DSTL Substantive Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine Substantive Forensic Access Ltd. Substantive Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spetrometry Substantive (FIRMS) Network Forensic Science Northern Ireland Substantive Forensic Science Service 1 Substantive Forensic Science Service 2 Substantive Forensic Science Society Substantive Forensic Telecommunication Services Ltd Substantive Forensic Working Group for the Partnership Substantive against Wildlife Crime Freelance Scientists (but aligned to universities) Substantive Home Office Scientific Development Branch Substantive (name changed to Centre for Applied Science and Technology in April 2011) Intellect (trade association for the IT, telecoms Substantive and electronics industries) LGC Forensics Substantive LTG Executive Committee Substantive The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen Substantive National DNA Database Ethics Group Substantive National Physical Laboratory Substantive National Policing Improvement Agency Substantive Natural History Museum Substantive Prospect
    [Show full text]
  • Adrian Wilson Electrical Technology Specialist Narec Limited Eddie Ferguson House Ridley Street Blyth Northumberland NE24 3AG
    Eddie Ferguson House Ridley Street, Blyth, Northumberland, NE24 3AG Tel: 01670 359 555 Fax: 01670 359 666 www.narec.co.uk ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Adrian Wilson Electrical Technology Specialist NaREC Limited Eddie Ferguson House Ridley Street Blyth Northumberland NE24 3AG 15th July 2005 Arthur Cooke, Ofgem, 9 Millbank, London SW1P 3GE Your Ref 123/05 Dear Mr Cooke, This is the New and Renewable Energy Centre’s response to your consultation “The regulatory implications of domestic scale microgeneration” dated April 2005. NaREC will also be responding to the Microgeneration Strategy Consultation that the Government is undertaking presently and may make some of the same points. Ofgem may ignore the confidentiality automatically attached to the covering email and can feel free to publish, act upon or use as seen fit this document in response this consultation or for other purposes. Our Background The New and Renewable Energy Centre Ltd (NaREC) was established in 2002 as a Centre of Excellence for the new and renewable energy technologies under the auspices of the DTI and One North East, the Regional Development Agency. NaREC’s mission is to foster the growth, development and commercialisation of new and emerging renewable energy technologies. NaREC’s UK-wide objective is to provide tangible leadership and practical technical assistance that will enable emerging technologies to be harnessed commercially to solve the UK’s future energy requirements. Our government is keen to encourage long term investment in new and renewable energy sources, since they see this as part of a balanced approach to meeting the country’s future energy needs. NaREC shares the key aspirations contained in the government’s White Paper published in February 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human-Capital Needs of Tech-City, London
    THE HUMAN-CAPITAL NEEDS OF TECH CITY, LONDON By Max Nathan TRANSATLANTIC COUNCIL ON MIGRATION THE HUMAN-CAPITAL NEEDS OF TECH CITY, LONDON Max Nathan August 2014 Acknowledgments This research was commissioned by the Transatlantic Council on Migration, an initiative of the Migration Policy Institute (MPI), for its eleventh plenary meeting, held during November 2013 in London. The meeting’s theme was “Cities and Regions: Reaping Migration’s Local Dividends” and this paper was one of the reports that informed the Council’s discussions. The Council is a unique deliberative body that examines vital policy issues and informs migration policymaking processes in North America and Europe. The Council’s work is generously supported by the following foundations and governments: Open Society Foundations, Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Barrow Cadbury Trust (UK policy partner), the Luso-American Development Foundation, the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, and the governments of Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden. For more on the Transatlantic Council on Migration, please visit: www.migrationpolicy.org/transatlantic. © 2014 Migration Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved. Cover Design: Danielle Tinker, MPI Typesetting: Rebecca Kilberg, MPI No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Migration Policy Institute. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from www.migrationpolicy.org. Information for reproducing excerpts from this report can be found at www.migrationpolicy.org/about/copyright-policy. Inquiries can also be directed to: Permissions Department, Migration Policy Institute, 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036, or by contacting [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Imaginaries and Tech Cities: Place-Branding East London's Digital Economy
    Title Spatial Imaginaries and Tech Cities: Place-branding East London’s digital economy Type Article URL https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/14511/ Dat e 2 0 1 8 Citation Voss, Georgina and Nathan, Max and Vandore, Emma (2018) Spatial Imaginaries and Tech Cities: Place-branding East London’s digital economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 19 (2). pp. 409-432. ISSN 1468-2710 Cr e a to rs Voss, Georgina and Nathan, Max and Vandore, Emma Usage Guidelines Please refer to usage guidelines at http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/policies.html or alternatively contact [email protected] . License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Unless otherwise stated, copyright owned by the author FORTHCOMING IN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY Spatial Imaginaries and Tech Cities: Place-branding East London's digital economy Max Nathan1, Emma Vandore2 and Georgina Voss3 1 University of Birmingham. Corresponding author 2 Kagisha Ltd 3 London College of Communication Corresponding author details: Birmingham Business School, University House, University of Birmingham, BY15 2TY. [email protected] Abstract We explore place branding as an economic development strategy for technology clusters, using London’s ‘Tech City’ initiative as a case study. We site place branding in a larger family of policies that develop spatial imaginaries, and specify affordances and constraints on place brands and brand-led strategies. Using mixed methods over a long timeframe, we analyse Tech City’s emergence and the overlapping, competing narratives that preceded and succeeded it, highlighting day-to-day challenges and more basic tensions. While a strong brand has developed, we cast doubt on claims that policy has had a catalytic effect, at least in the ways originally intended.
    [Show full text]
  • Students Take Control of Imperial's New Carbon Capture Pilot Plant → Centre
    Issue 246 ▸ 3 May 2012 reporterSharing stories of Imperial’s community In charge Students take control of Imperial’s new carbon capture pilot plant → centre pages MADAME LIU MATHS MAN BIG SPLASH YANDONG Professor Staff member Chinese State Richard Craster to canoe the Councillor visits on his first six length of the the College months as HoD Thames PAGE 3 PAGE 10 PAGE 13 2 >> newsupdate www.imperial.ac.uk/reporter | reporter | 3 May 2012 • Issue 246 Future of microsurgery unveiled Sir Paul Nurse, President of the Royal Society, officially opened Imperial’s newly refurbished Hamlyn Centre on 16 April. Guests were able to see the EDITOR’S CORNER latest developments in robot assisted microsurgery – minimally invasive sur- gery with micro-scale imaging and manipulation – made possible by funding totalling £5 million from the Wolfson Foundation and the National Institute for Open house Health Research (NIHR) underpinned by the Helen Hamlyn Trust endowment. The Hamlyn Centre, which is split across three Imperial campuses – Hamlyn Centre in advancing robot South Kensington, St Mary’s and Northwick Park – has been refurbished with assisted microsurgery.” From tackling malaria to cutting edge new technologies and a pre-clinical imaging suite for clinical tri- Lord Darzi, Chair of the Institute creating spray-on clothes als to enable clinicians and technicians to validate new surgical robots in the and co-director of the Hamlyn – conveying the amazing patient. The long-term hope is that the robots in the Hamlyn Centre will be Centre, said: “The new facilities breadth of work that goes integrated with imaging and sensing technologies to perform microsurgery, will allow us to build on our unique on at Imperial to family and for example, on cancerous cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Removing Barriers for Deployment Through Policy Development; the UK Case Study
    3rd International Conference on Ocean Energy, 6 October, Bilbao Removing barriers for deployment through policy development; the UK case study. 1 O H. Wragg 1 RenewableUK, Greencoat House, Victoria, London, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract and carbon emission reduction. In the UK this came firstly from the European Renewable Energy Systems This paper will provide an overview of the directive [1] and secondly through the UK Climate current state of the UK marine energy industry, Change Act [2]. covering installed capacity to date, planed projects The two further key pieces of UK primary and development scenarios up to 2020. Reference legislation that have subsequently be established are the will be made to the development of RenewableUK’s Renewables Obligation [3], which provides the UK’s renewable Energy Database. revenue support mechanisms for renewable energy, and This paper will also outline the major the Marine and Costal Access Bill [4], which will recommendations form RenewableUK’s response to develop a clearly defined system for planning and the UK Marine Energy Action Plan and how this licensing commercial activities within the UK’s could facilitate development. Particular attention renewable energy zone[5]. will be made to: The UK Government has also produced several key • How the secondary legislation arising from the documents within the past year. In 2009 the Marine and Coastal Access Bill will impact the Department of Energy and Climate Change published industry. the Renewable Energy Strategy [6] and the Department • The current status of the UK funding landscape for Business Innovation and Skills launched the Low and possible development pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Contestability in the Public Service Economy Gary L
    Diversity and Contestability in the Public Service Economy Gary L. Sturgess Invigorating business Call 13 26 96 nswbusinesschamber.com.au NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS OLIVIER JOB INDEX NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER OLIVIER JOB INDEX NSW NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND Gary L. Sturgess is Adjunct Professor of Public Service Delivery at the Australian School PUBLICof SERVICE Business (University ECONOMY of NSW), based NSW at the Australia BUSINESS and New Zealand CHAMBER School of DIVERSITY Government. He also holds an Adjunct Professorship with the School of Government DIVERSITYand Public AND Policy CONTESTABILITY at Griffith University.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Physics Review
    The Blackett Laboratory Department of Physics Review Faculty of Natural Sciences 2008/09 Contents Preface from the Head of Department 2 Undergraduate Teaching 54 Academic Staff group photograph 9 Postgraduate Studies 59 General Departmental Information 10 PhD degrees awarded (by research group) 61 Research Groups 11 Research Grants Grants obtained by research group 64 Astrophysics 12 Technical Development, Intellectual Property 69 and Commercial Interactions (by research group) Condensed Matter Theory 17 Academic Staff 72 Experimental Solid State 20 Administrative and Support Staff 76 High Energy Physics 25 Optics - Laser Consortium 30 Optics - Photonics 33 Optics - Quantum Optics and Laser Science 41 Plasma Physics 38 Space and Atmospheric Physics 45 Theoretical Physics 49 Front cover: Laser probing images of jet propagating in ambient plasma and a density map from a 3D simulation of a nested, stainless steel, wire array experiment - see Plamsa Physics group page 38. 1 Preface from the Heads of Department During 2008 much of the headline were invited by, Ian Pearson MP, the within the IOP Juno code of practice grabbing news focused on ‘big science’ Minister of State for Science and (available to download at with serious financial problems at the Innovation, to initiate a broad ranging www.ioppublishing.com/activity/diver Science and Technology Facilities review of physics research under sity/Gender/Juno_code_of_practice/ Council (STFC) (we note that some the chairmanship of Professor Bill page_31619.html). As noted in the 40% of the Department’s research Wakeham (Vice-Chancellor of IOP document, “The code … sets expenditure is STFC derived) and Southampton University). The stated out practical ideas for actions that the start-up of the Large Hadron purpose of the review was to examine departments can take to address the Collider at CERN.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Potential of the Global Marine Energy Industry 02 South West Marine Energy Park Prospectus 1St Edition January 2012 03
    Unlocking the potential of the global marine energy industry 02 South West Marine Energy Park Prospectus 1st edition January 2012 03 The SOUTH WEST MARINE ENERGY PARK is: a collaborative partnership between local and national government, Local Enterprise Partnerships, technology developers, academia and industry a physical and geographic zone with priority focus for marine energy technology development, energy generation projects and industry growth The geographic scope of the South West Marine Energy Park (MEP) extends from Bristol to Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, with a focus around the ports, research facilities and industrial clusters found in Cornwall, Plymouth and Bristol. At the heart of the South West MEP is the access to the significant tidal, wave and offshore wind resources off the South West coast and in the Bristol Channel. The core objective of the South West MEP is to: create a positive business environment that will foster business collaboration, attract investment and accelerate the commercial development of the marine energy sector. “ The South West Marine Energy Park builds on the region’s unique mix of renewable energy resource and home-grown academic, technical and industrial expertise. Government will be working closely with the South West MEP partnership to maximise opportunities and support the Park’s future development. ” Rt Hon Greg Barker MP, Minister of State, DECC The South West Marine Energy Park prospectus Section 1 of the prospectus outlines the structure of the South West MEP and identifies key areas of the programme including measures to provide access to marine energy resources, prioritise investment in infrastructure, reduce project risk, secure international finance, support enterprise and promote industry collaboration.
    [Show full text]