DOCSLIB.ORG

Pronghorn Procurement on the Northern Plains: a Case for Small-Scale Hunting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pronghorn Procurement on the Northern Plains: a Case for Small-Scale Hunting Pronghorn Procurement on the Northern Plains: A Case for Small-Scale Hunting A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment ofthe Requirements for the Degree ofMaster ofArts in the Department of A~chaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Alan James Youell © Copyright Alan James Youell, May 2005. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying ofthis thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head ofthe Department or the Dean ofthe College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying, publication, or use ofthis thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University ofSaskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made ofany material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use ofmaterial in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head ofthe Department ofArchaeology University ofSaskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan sm 5Bl Abstract In general, when an archaeologist addresses the issue offaunal procurement on the Plains, especially the northern Plains, the model used entails the communal hunting of bison. The·non-communal procurement ofa secondary prey species is frequently overlooked by Plains archaeologists. It is the intent ofthis thesis to present a pronghorn procurement strategy that aligns itselfwith the current archaeological evidence, gathered from across the northern Plains. Based on the abundance ofWyoming and Great Basin communal pronghorn procurement features, along with a single northern Plains trapping structure, the procurement ofpronghorn is often regarded as a communal undertaking. However, a review ofthe site literature reveals that archaeological pronghorn remains are present in small quantities in numerous habitation sites situated throughout their prehistork range. In addition, evidence for pronghorn kill sites on the northern Plains is minimal at present. This leaves one to ponder the question; why are small quantities ofpronghorn remains present in campsites across the northern Plains? The first part ofthis thesis addresses the above question through the examination of the unique behavioural and morphological characteristics ofthe pronghorn, as well as bow and arrow technology. This is undertaken in order to demonstrate the suitability of both the pronghorn and the aboriginal hunting technology to small-scale procurement. In addition ethnographic, historic and archaeological data concerning pronghorn procurement on the northern Plains are presented in a framework that allows for a revision ofprevailing models concerning this activity. In addition, small-scale and communal procurement is analyzed within the theoretical framework ofoptimal foraging theory. This provides evidence that the small-scale hunting ofpronghorn was an efficient hunting strategy and therefore it is reasonable to assume that it was practiced prehistorically. The remainder ofthis thesis addresses a secondary, yet relevant, question involving the lack ofvisibility ofpronghorn remains in the archaeological record. Ifpronghorn were an obtainable and useful secondary resource then why are such small quantities of bone present at archaeological sites situated within ideal pronghorn habitat? This question is explored within the context ofbone survivorship. With both cultural and non-cultural reasons for the differential preservation ofpronghorn remains being outlined. Specifically, carnivore attrition, weathering and trampling are explored as possible non-cultural agents that affect the archaeological visibility ofpronghorn assemblages. Cultural processes include primary/secondary butchering and processing strategies as well as carcass transportation decisions are also investigated. In addition, the pronghorn assemblages from EbPi-75 and DIOu-72 are statistically tested to determine ifbone density has any correlation to element frequency. Finally, the two recently excavated northern Plains pronghorn assemblages from EbPi-75 and DIOu-72 are analyzed and compared to the existing body ofarchaeological research from the northern Plains, High Plains, and the Wyoming Basin. From this comparison and the thesis research in general, a new model for pronghorn procurement is developed that better suits the northern Plains archaeological record to date. ii Acknowledgements I would like to start by thanking the University of Saskatchewan, Department of Archaeology, specifically the members ofmy Graduate Committee; Dr. Margaret Kennedy, Dr. David Meyer, and my supervisor Dr. Ernest Walker. In addition, I would like to thank my external examiner Dr. Dick Neal. Also, I extend a special thank you to Debbie Croteau for her assistance in all matters administrative. I would like to acknowledge the University of Saskatchewan, Department of Archaeology and the Saskatchewan Archaeological Society and SaskLotteries Trust Fund for Sport, Culture and Recreation for their generous financial support. This thesis would have taken considerably longer to complete without it. The success ofthis thesis relied heavily on the previous work ofa number of professional archaeologists. My appreciation is extended to Alison Landals and the entire staffofFMA Heritage Resource Consultants Inc., especially those who worked on the Little Bow Reservoir Project Ltd. In addition, I extend my thanks to Dr. Shawn Goldsmith and the entire staff at Bison Historical Services, especially those who worked on the Bow Island Project. A number ofarchaeologists/friends are worthy ofspecial thanks. Each individual contributed significantly in the areas ofmentorship, technical support, constructive comments, proofing and research assistance, and most importantly encouragement. For the above contributions, I wish to thank Dr. David Blower, Dr. Jonathan Driver, Dr. David Ebert, Dr. Chris Foley, Dr. Len Hills, Dr. Trevor Peck and the entire staffat the Archeological Survey ofAlberta, Edmonton. I also wish to thank Barb Neal and my Fellow Graduate Students for their advise, support and friendship. In addition, I would also like to thank the many individuals who were not mentioned by name but assisted in this work or allowed me to pontificate about pronghorn during a conversation. Finally, I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my family and friends. Thank you Mom and Dad for introducing me to the outdoors, and for your support in all my endeavors both educational and otherwise. Thanks to my loving sister Shawna, you have always played an important role in my life. Lastly, a special thank you to Cheryl Forner, my friend and partner. I love spending my outdoor time with you and without you I never would have completed this thesis. iii Run, Don't Walk Every morning on the northern Plains, a pronghorn wakes up. It knows that it must run faster than the fastest coyote or it will be killed. Every morning on the northern Plains, a coyote wakes up. It knows that it must outrun the slowest pronghorn or it will starve to death. It doesn't matter whether you are a coyote or a pronghorn; when the sun comes up, you'd better be running! TABLE OF CONTENTS PERMISSION TO USE ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix CHAPTER ONE: Introduction 1.1 Introduction to the Problem 1 1.2 Statement ofObjectives 2 1.3 The Study Area: Natural and Cultural Setting 5 1.4 Chapter Summary 7 CHAPTER TWO: ·An Introduction to the Pronghorn 2.1 Chapter Introduction 11 2.2 Taxonomy and Evolution 12 2.2.1 Nomenclature 12 2.2.2 Evolutionary Perspective 14 2.2.3 Historical Perspective 17 2.3 Distribution: Past and Present 19 2.3.1 North American Distribution 19 2.3.2 Canadian Distribution 20 2.4 Physical Description 23 2.4.1 Skin and Pelage 23 2.4.2 Skull Morphology 25 2.4.3 Horns 27 2.4.4 Appendicular Skeleton 29 2.5 Physiology 30 2.5.1 Pronghorn Adaptations 30 2.5.2 Body Mass and Dimensions 31 2.5.3 Aerobic Capacity 33 2.6 Ecology 34 2.6.1 Habitat Characteristics 34 2.6.2 Nutrient Requirements 36 2.6.3 Home Range and Territory 39 2.6.4 Movements and Migration Routes 40 2.6.5 Wintering 43 2.7 Reproduction 46 2.7.1 Breeding Biology and Behaviour 46 iv 2.8 Mortality Factors 48 2.8.1 Pronghorn Survivorship 48 2.8.2 Predation 49 2.8.3 Anti-Predator Behaviour 50 2.9 Ethology 53 2.9.1 Introduction to Pronghorn Ethology 53 2.9.2 Jumping Ability 54 2.9.3 Activity Patterns 55 2.9.4 Migratory Behaviour 55 2.9.5 Group Behaviour 57 2.9.6 Curiosity 59 2.10 Conclusion 60 CHAPTER THREE: Archaeological Sites Pertinent to Northern Plains Pronghorn Research 3.1 Background 61 3.1.1 Overview ofRelevant Archaeological Sites 61 3.2 Significant Sites (United States ofAmerica) 64 3.2.1 Montana 64 3.2.1.1 Lost Terrace Site (24CH68) 64 3.2.1.2 Pictograph Cave (24YL1) 66 3.2.1.3 Sun River Site (24CA74) 67 3.2.2 South Dakota 69 3.2.2.1 Lighting Spring Site (39HN204) 69 3.2.2.239FA23 73 3.2.2.3 39FA83 75 3.2.3 Wyoming 76 3.2.3.1 Agate Basin, Sheaman Locality (48NA211) 76 and Agate Basin Site (48N0201) 3.2.3.2 Austin Wash Site (48UT390) 78 3.2.3.3 Boar's Tusk Site (48SW1373) 81 3.2.3.4 Bridger Antelope
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment M Amendment 2 to the Jonah Programmatic Agreement
    Attachment M Amendment 2 to the Jonah Programmatic Agreement APPENDIX A CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN for the Jonah Gas Field, Sublette County, Wyoming 15, JUNE 2007 Theoretical Perspective. A useful approach to structuring data recovery derives from assumptions inherent in evolutionary ecology (Bettinger 1991). Human behaviors are viewed as being adaptive in the sense that the long term success of a group depends upon knowledge and adaptive behaviors being passed from one generation to the next. In order to focus on archaeological evidence for these behaviors, models based on hunter-gatherer mobility (Binford 1980) and on food (energy) costs are used. Sometimes termed middle range research, these approaches form a bridge between broad theory and the archaeological record. Binford's (1980) observations showing that hunter-gatherers organize along a continuum of strategies between two extremes, foraging and collecting, have laid the groundwork for much debate in archaeology (Gould 1980; Hodder 1986), but have also stimulated a very useful way to view the archaeological record (Binford 1983; Price and Brown 1985; Kelly 1983; 1995; Watson 1986). The forager-collector model and others of a similar nature (e.g. Bettinger and Baumhoff 1982) provide the archaeologist with a powerful set of tools for interpreting archaeological remains. The archaeological record is viewed as being reflective of sets of behaviors used by prehistoric people in their daily lives. Evidence of these behaviors includes tools and facilities, the nature and distribution of refuse produced by tool manufacture and use, and the overall patterning of these remains both within individual sites and over the landscape. Care must be used in interpreting the meaning of the patterning of remains in order to account for various natural and cultural distortions that may have affected this record during the elapsed period of time since the prehistoric activity occurred (e.g., Schiffer 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife and Energy Development Pronghorn of the Upper Green River Basin – Year 1 Summary
    JANUARY 2006 Wildlife & energy development Pronghorn of the Upper Green River Basin - Year 1 Summary By Joel Berger, Kim Murray Berger, Jon P. Beckmann Project Funding by Shell Exploration and Production Company, Ultra Petroleum, Anschutz Petroleum, and The Wildlife Conservation Society The Wildlife Conservation Society The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) is dedicated to saving wildlife and wildlands to assure a future for threatened species like elephants, tigers, sharks, macaws, or lynx. That mission is achieved through a conservation program that protects some 50 living landscapes around the world, manages more than 300 field projects in 53 countries, and supports the nation’s larg- est system of living institutions – the Bronx Zoo, the New York Aquarium, the Wildlife Centers in Central Park, Queens, and Prospect Park, and the Wildlife Survival Center on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. We are devel- oping and maintaining pioneering environmental education programs that reach more than three million people in the New York metropolitan area as well as in all 50 Unites States and 14 other countries. We are working to make future generations inheritors, not just survivors. To learn more about WCS visit www.wcs.org. WCS has been an active force in North American conservation since 1895. Bison reintroduction, legislation to protect endangered wildlife, and the establishment of more than twenty parks and reserves were early WCS accomplishments. Pioneering studies of bighorn sheep, elk, cougars, and wolves all benefited from WCS support. Today the WCS North America Program takes a science-based approach to conservation in more than forty projects in twenty-one states and provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places 2007 Weekly Lists
    National Register of Historic Places 2007 Weekly Lists January 5, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................. 3 January 12, 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 8 January 19, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 14 January 26, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 20 February 2, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 27 February 9, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 40 February 16, 2007 ....................................................................................................................................... 47 February 23, 2007 ....................................................................................................................................... 55 March 2, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................. 62 March 9, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Form 10 900 OMB No. 1024 0018
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Medicine House Site other names/site number 48CR2353 2. Location street & number x not for publication x city or town Hanna vicinity state Wyoming code WY county Carbon code 007 zip code 82327 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national x statewide local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wyoming Archaeologist
    THE WYOMING ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 56(1) SPRING 2012 ISSN: 0043-9665 [THIS ISSUE PUBLISHED February 2013] THE WYOMING ARCHAEOLOGIST Wyoming Archaeological Society, Inc. Larry Amundson, President Please send a minimum of two (2) hard copies of each manuscript 85 Goosenob Dr submitted. A third copy would speed the process. Please contact Riverton WY 82501 the Managing Editor for instructions if the manuscript is available in 307-856-3373 electronic format. Readers should consult the articles in this issue for style and format. Deadline for submission of copy for spring is- Email [email protected] sues is January 1 and for all issues is July 1. Reports and articles received by the Managing Editor after those dates will be held for Bill Scoggin, 1st Vice President the following issue. PO Box 456 Rawlins WY 82301-0456 The membership period is from January 1 through December 31. Email [email protected] All subscriptions expire with the Fall/Winter issue and renewals are due January 1 of each year. Continuing members whose dues are Judy Wolf, 2nd Vice President not paid by March 31 of the new year will receive back issues only upon payment of $5.00 per issue. If you have a change of address, 1657 Riverside Dr please notify the Executive Secretary/Treasurer. Your WYOMING Laramie WY 82070-6627 ARCHAEOLOGIST will not be forwarded unless payment is received Email [email protected] for return and forwarding postage. Back issues in print can be pur- chased for $5.00 each, plus postage. Back issues out of print are Carolyn M Buff, Executive Secretary/Treasurer available at $0.25 per page plus postage.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Chapter 18: Wyoming
    Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Central United States VOLUME 16 - CHAPTER 18 Montana North Dakota Minnesota Colorado Illinois Wisconsin South Dakota Indiana Wyoming Michigan Iowa Iowa Kansas Nebraska Michigan Ohio Utah Illinois Indiana Minnesota Colorado Missouri Kansas Missouri Montana Nebraska North Dakota Ohio South Dakota Utah Wisconsin Wyoming JUNE 2017 First Responder Network Authority Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Central United States VOLUME 16 - CHAPTER 18 Amanda Goebel Pereira, AICP NEPA Coordinator First Responder Network Authority U.S. Department of Commerce 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr. M/S 243 Reston, VA 20192 Cooperating Agencies Federal Communications Commission General Services Administration U.S. Department of Agriculture—Rural Utilities Service U.S. Department of Agriculture—U.S. Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture—Natural Resource Conservation Service U.S. Department of Commerce—National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Defense—Department of the Air Force U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Homeland Security June 2017 Page Intentionally Left Blank. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 18 FirstNet Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network Wyoming Contents 18. Wyoming ............................................................................................................................. 18-7 18.1. Affected
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Hunts Or Mass Kills? Investigating the Origins of Archaeological Pronghorn Bonebeds in Southwest Wyoming Author(S): Jack N
    Society for American Archaeology Occasional Hunts or Mass Kills? Investigating the Origins of Archaeological Pronghorn Bonebeds in Southwest Wyoming Author(s): Jack N. Fenner Source: American Antiquity, Vol. 74, No. 2 (Apr., 2009), pp. 323-350 Published by: Society for American Archaeology Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20622429 . Accessed: 10/02/2015 00:46 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society for American Archaeology is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Antiquity. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 130.56.5.15 on Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:46:38 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions OCCASIONAL HUNTS OR MASS KILLS? INVESTIGATING THE ORIGINS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRONGHORN BONEBEDS IN SOUTHWEST WYOMING JackN. Fenner It is often unclear whether an archaeological animal bonebed was formed by a mass kill of individuals from a single prey population or through the accumulation of a number of separate kills which occurred over a long time period or at multi ple locations. The isotope ratio variation within animals from an archaeological bonebed can be used to investigate this question by comparing the isotope ratio variation within an archaeological assemblage to the variation within modern pop ulations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Resources Model for Pine Valley, Nevada
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA A Cultural Resources Model for Pine Valley, Nevada by Michael Drews Eric lngbar David Zeanah William Eckerle Cultural Resources Series No. 13 2004 • • • • • • • • • • A Cultural Resources Model for Pine Valley, Nevada • Final Report on Department of Energy Agreement DE-FC26-01BC15337 • • • by • Michael Drews • Gnomon, Inc. • Eric lngbar • Gnomon, Inc. • David Zeanah • California State University Sacramento William Eckerle • Western Geoarch Research • • Gnomon, Inc. • 1601 Fairview Drive, Suite F • Carson City, Nevada 89701 • • with the assistance of: • Nevada Division of Minerals • July, 2002 • • 1• • • • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • The work reported here has many roots. Models and spatial hypotheses in management • and archaeology have a long, long history. One cannot begin to state the intellectual debts • owed. • This project could never have succeeded without the prior work done by David Zeanah and the staff of Intermountain Research. The seminal studies sponsored by the U.S. Fish • and Wildlife Service, then by the Naval Air Station, Fallon, provided the impetus for this project. The Bureau of Land Management Railroad Valley planning project is the • immediate progenitor of this work. Without the Bureau's initiation of that work, this work would not exist. The Department of Energy made possible this study, a sponsorship • and collaboration that could never have occurred without the assistance of the Bureau of • Land Management and, especially, the Nevada Division of Minerals . • The staff of the Nevada Division of Minerals were responsible for all of the outreach and public coordination. They did a terrific job. John Snow and Alan Coyner of the Division • served as our industry and agency coordinators.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes for WAPA Spring Meeting, April 9, 2010, Casper, Wyoming
    Minutes for WAPA Spring Meeting, April 9, 2010, Casper, Wyoming President Jana Pastor called meeting to order. WAPA board welcomed all attending. Officers and attendees introduced themselves. Secretary’s Report: Adam Graves: Read the minutes from the Fall 2009 WAPA Meeting in Lander, Wyoming. Motion to accept minutes passed. Treasurer’s Report: John Laughlin: John Laughlin: The WAPA checking account has $6718.28 of which $1,144.00 belongs to the Project Archaeology funds that WAPA holds for the BLM, leaving $5574.28 of actual WAPA checking account funds. The Putnam account continues to rebound. At the end of the third quarter of 2010, the Putnam account balance stood at $10,731.26. As of April 8, 2010 the Putnam account stood at $13008.04, an increase of $2276.78 since the fall meeting. Expenditures incurred since the spring 2009 meeting total $1416.46 and consist of: $43.66 Radio Shack-Microphone $194.60 Best Western Lander-Fall 2009 meeting room rental/refreshments $100.00 Jason Bush Cancer Fund $179.00 Sam Trautman-Web upkeep $40.00 PO Box rental $250.00 Wyoming Archaeology Awareness Month donation $21.20 Kinko’s-2010 Dues Mailing $88.00 USPS-2010 Dues Mailing $500.00 2010 WAS Spring Meeting Brad Humphrey Award The majority of WAPA dues for 2010 have been paid (73/98 members with outstanding 2010 dues). Membership as of 4/9/10 is 124. Committee Reports: Vice President Joe Daniele: There are 6 new members since last meeting. Agency and Contractors Reports (see also below): Mary Hopkins: Summarized SHPO report.
    [Show full text]
  • Green River Drift Trail Traditional Cultural Property Other Names/Site Number the Drift; 48SU7312 ~~~~~~~~------2
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 REeetvro 22ao 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NOV 0 1 2013 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets If needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Green River Drift Trail Traditional Cultural Property other names/site number The Drift; 48SU7312 ~~~~~~~~--------------------------------------------------- 2. Location street & number Linear corridor that generally follows the upper Green River & crosses B not for publication BLM Pinedale & Bridger Teton National Forest lands. city or town Cora vicinity ~~---------------------------------------------------- state code WY county Sublette code 035 zip code __:8:..::2:.::9.=.25=-- -- 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ...!....__ nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ____x_ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national __1L_ statewide _local In my opinion, the property ){meets_ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment K Amendment 2 to the Jonah Programmatic Agreement
    Attachment K Amendment 2 to the Jonah Programmatic Agreement APPENDIX A CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN for the Jonah Gas Field, Sublette County, Wyoming 15, JUNE 2007 Theoretical Perspective. A useful approach to structuring data recovery derives from assumptions inherent in evolutionary ecology (Bettinger 1991). Human behaviors are viewed as being adaptive in the sense that the long term success of a group depends upon knowledge and adaptive behaviors being passed from one generation to the next. In order to focus on archaeological evidence for these behaviors, models based on hunter-gatherer mobility (Binford 1980) and on food (energy) costs are used. Sometimes termed middle range research, these approaches form a bridge between broad theory and the archaeological record. Binford's (1980) observations showing that hunter-gatherers organize along a continuum of strategies between two extremes, foraging and collecting, have laid the groundwork for much debate in archaeology (Gould 1980; Hodder 1986), but have also stimulated a very useful way to view the archaeological record (Binford 1983; Price and Brown 1985; Kelly 1983; 1995; Watson 1986). The forager-collector model and others of a similar nature (e.g. Bettinger and Baumhoff 1982) provide the archaeologist with a powerful set of tools for interpreting archaeological remains. The archaeological record is viewed as being reflective of sets of behaviors used by prehistoric people in their daily lives. Evidence of these behaviors includes tools and facilities, the nature and distribution of refuse produced by tool manufacture and use, and the overall patterning of these remains both within individual sites and over the landscape. Care must be used in interpreting the meaning of the patterning of remains in order to account for various natural and cultural distortions that may have affected this record during the elapsed period of time since the prehistoric activity occurred (e.g., Schiffer 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Technical Report in Support of Final Environmental
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resources Technical Report Riley Ridge to Natrona Project DECEMBER 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Cultural Context .................................................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Prehistoric Overview ................................................................................................................. 1 2.1.1 Paleoindian Period (ca. 11,500 to 8,500 B.P.). ............................................................. 3 2.1.2 Archaic Period (ca. 8,500 to 1,800 B.P.) ...................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Late Prehistoric Period (ca. 1,800 to 300 B.P.) ............................................................ 9 2.1.4 Protohistoric Period (A.D. 1600 to 1800). ................................................................. 11 2.2 Historic Overview ................................................................................................................... 13 3.0 Baseline Cultural Resources Inventory ............................................................................................. 19 3.1 Cultural Resources Site Data ................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Historic Properties Listed in the National Register of Historic
    [Show full text]