DOCSLIB.ORG

A Cultural Resources Model for Pine Valley, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA A Cultural Resources Model for Pine Valley, Nevada by Michael Drews Eric lngbar David Zeanah William Eckerle Cultural Resources Series No. 13 2004 • • • • • • • • • • A Cultural Resources Model for Pine Valley, Nevada • Final Report on Department of Energy Agreement DE-FC26-01BC15337 • • • by • Michael Drews • Gnomon, Inc. • Eric lngbar • Gnomon, Inc. • David Zeanah • California State University Sacramento William Eckerle • Western Geoarch Research • • Gnomon, Inc. • 1601 Fairview Drive, Suite F • Carson City, Nevada 89701 • • with the assistance of: • Nevada Division of Minerals • July, 2002 • • 1• • • • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • The work reported here has many roots. Models and spatial hypotheses in management • and archaeology have a long, long history. One cannot begin to state the intellectual debts • owed. • This project could never have succeeded without the prior work done by David Zeanah and the staff of Intermountain Research. The seminal studies sponsored by the U.S. Fish • and Wildlife Service, then by the Naval Air Station, Fallon, provided the impetus for this project. The Bureau of Land Management Railroad Valley planning project is the • immediate progenitor of this work. Without the Bureau's initiation of that work, this work would not exist. The Department of Energy made possible this study, a sponsorship • and collaboration that could never have occurred without the assistance of the Bureau of • Land Management and, especially, the Nevada Division of Minerals . • The staff of the Nevada Division of Minerals were responsible for all of the outreach and public coordination. They did a terrific job. John Snow and Alan Coyner of the Division • served as our industry and agency coordinators. Wanda Martin kept the administrative • wheels turning at the Division for the project • The BLM Elko Field Office staff, especially Bryan Hockett and Tim Murphy, were great supporters and helped the project proceed in a rational fas'hion. The Bureau of Land State • Office staff - Dr. Pat Barker and Steve Wells - were instrumental in keeping the momentum of the work moving forward from Railroad Valley. The Nevada Petroleum • Society, represented by Jerry Walker, were able and active collaborat0rs in helping us to understand the perspectives of industry. The Nevada State Museum and the Nevada State • Historic Preservation Office were, as always, extremely helpful . • We were assisted in the final stages by able reviewers and interested parties. Tim Seaman • and Mary Hopkins traveled from New Mexico and Wyoming, respectively, to assist. Marilyn Nickels of the Bureau of Land Management and William Hochheiser of the • Department of Energy made the arduous trek from Washington, D.C., to attend our workshop on the study. Many BLM field office cultural resource specialists took time • from busy schedules to talk with us by phone and even to attend the workshop. We are • very grateful for all of the help, criticism, and encouragement given. • We authors would be remiss if we did not thank the staff members of our respective • organizations. This project is theirs too. Only the errors, gaffes, and mistakes are ours. • • • • • • • • • • Table of Contents • Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... i List of Figures ...................................................................................................................... v • List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... vi • Chapter 1 -- Overview and Introduction... ....................................................................... 1-1 • The Management of Cultural Resources .................................................................... 1-3 An Overview of Model Fonnulation ......................................................................... 1-4 • The Pine Valley Study ............................................................................................... 1-8 • Chapter 2--The Pine Valley Model Area ......................................................................... 2-1 Introduction... ............................................................................................................. 2-1 • Project Area Definition .............................................................................................. 2-1 • Geography .................................................................................................................. 2-3 Geology ...................................................................................................................... 2-6 • Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 2-8 Landforms .................................................................................................................. 2-8 • Bounding Mountains. ............................................................................................ 2-8 • Piedmont Slopes ................................................................................................... 2-8 Fan Skirts ........................................................................................................... 2-13 • Basin Floors ....................................................................................................... 2-13 Soils .......................................................................................................................... 2-14 • Paleoenvironrnental Context .................................................................................... 2-16 Full Glacial Period (18,000 - 15,000 BP) .......................................................... 2-17 • Deglaciation (15,000 - 11,000 BP) .................................................................... 2-18 • Terminal Pleistocene/Holocene Transition (11,000 - 9000 BP) ........................ 2-19 Early Holocene (9000 - 7500 BP) ...................................................................... 2-20 • Middle Holocene (7500 - 5000 BP) ................................................................... 2-21 Middle to Early-Late Holocene (5000 - 3500 BP) ............................................. 2-22 • Middle-Late Holocene (3500 - 1000 BP) .......................................................... 2-22 Early-Latest Holocene (1000 - 500 BP) ............................................................. 2-23 • Terminal-Latest Holocene (500 - 150 BP) ......................................................... 2-24 • Prehistoric Cultural Context .................................................................................... 2-24 Pre-Archaic (11,000 BP to 8,000 BP)................................................................ 2-25 • Early Archaic (7,000 to 4,000 BP) ..................................................................... 2-27 Middle Archaic (4000 BP to 1500 BP) .............................................................. 2-27 • Late Archaic (1500 BP to Historic Contact) ...................................................... 2-27 Ethnographic Cultural Context ................................................................................ 2-28 • Historic Cultural Context ......................................................................................... 2-31 • Exploration. ........................................................................................................ 2-31 Transportation.................................................................................................... 2-32 • Ranching ............................................................................................................ 2-33 • Mining, Milling and Commerce ........................................................................ 2-34 • • • 11 • • • Chapter 3 -- Archaeological and Environmental Information Collection ....................... 3-1 • Archaeological Information ....................................................................................... 3-1 Cultural Resource Archive Maps ......................................................................... 3-1 • Archaeological Site Forms and Reports .............................................................. 3-1 General Land Office (GLO) Plats ........................................................................ 3-2 • Automated Data ................................................................................................... 3-2 Cultural Resource Information Gaps ................................................................... 3-3 • Natural Resmrces and Environmental Information .................................................. 3-3 Soils, Sediments, Landforms ............................................................................... 3-3 • Vegetation ............................................................................................................ 3-3 • Geomorphology and Geology .............................................................................. 3-4 Hydrology ............................................................................................................ 3-4 • Digital Topography .............................................................................................. 3-4 Natural Resource Information Gaps .................................................................... 3-4 • Chapter 4 -- Landscape Sensitivity .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Glasnik Je Besplatan RAZBIJAMO I RUŠIMO HDZ/SDP SUSTAV PRIDRUŽITE NAM SE!

    Glasnik Je Besplatan RAZBIJAMO I RUŠIMO HDZ/SDP SUSTAV PRIDRUŽITE NAM SE!

    Br oj 80 Izlazi subotom Zagreb, 14. studenog 2009. Sadržaj: Moj hrvatski dom 2 Pogled iz uredništva 3 Glasujmo 4 Za slobodu 5 Hrvatska knjižara 10 Lustracija 11 Predsjednici 17 Naše more hrvatsko 20 Klafranje 24 S Pantovčaka 27 Povijest i čovjek 30 U početku bijaše 31 majmun Zgodopis 34 U zapovjedništvu Hrvatskih snaga – Šipovo 15. listopada 1995. Osvrti 35 Bosno moja 46 Živjeti NDH 49 Hrvatski jezik 51 Čitajte s nama 52 Roman u nastavcima 53 Bog nas je stvorio 57 Ustaški hitrozov 61 Kolači 62 Čitatelji 63 Naklada 30.000 primjeraka Glasnik je besplatan RAZBIJAMO I RUŠIMO HDZ/SDP SUSTAV PRIDRUŽITE NAM SE! Prijaviti se možete na hitrozov [email protected] Stranica 2 Broj 80 -14. studenog 2009. Moj hrvatski dom BORBA ZA SLOBODU* Karlo Balen , Zagreb Peti osmog devedeset pete Sa svi strana sokolovi lete Sutra rano dok osvane zora Hrvacka se oslobađat mora Puca grmi na sve strane ori Vrane Tuđman potiho govori Hrabro naprid do kraljevskog Knina Braćo moja zove domovina Groblje Sveti Rok Vrane reče Gotovina kliče Kud on krene tu se ne uzmiče Kud on krene tu se ne uzmiče Tad Evropa nove note gudi Na sve strane crna krv se lije Na sve strane crna krv se lije A Hrvati slušaju ko ludi Borba teška nikom lako nije Borba teška nikom lako nije Brate mili umrit ću od tuge Hrvat bitku za slobodu bije Hrvat bitku za slobodu bije Postadosmo jope tuđe sluge Za tri dana stigoše do Knina Izdajice vršljaju po Hagu Veseli se cila domovina Veseli se cila domovina Optužuju svoju braću dragu Na tvrđi se šahovnica vije Na tvrđi se šahovnica vije Jal Hrvacki
  • Sphaeralcea Coccinea Scarlet Globemallow

    Sphaeralcea Coccinea Scarlet Globemallow

    Sphaeralcea coccinea Scarlet Globemallow by Kathy Lloyd Montana Native Plant Society Photo: Drake Barton Sphaeralcea coccinea (Scarlet Globemallow) is not an authentic Lewis and Clark collection. They believe the scarlet globemallow plants on that sheet carlet globemallow, a member of the mallow were grown from seed collected by Thomas Nuttall family (Malvaceae) was collected by in 1811. The other specimen sheet contains plants SMeriwether Lewis on July 20, 1806 along the Marias collected by Meriwether Lewis in Montana. The River in present-day Toole County. On the same label on the specimen, applied by the botanist day he also collected Gardner’s saltbush (Atriplex Frederick Pursh, says, “A malvaceous Small plant gardneri) and greasewood (Sarcobatus probably a Species of Malope. Plains of Missouri. vermiculatus). Lewis and his small band of men Jul. 20th 1806.” Lewis, always the eager naturalist, were attempting to follow the Marias River drainage took time to write in his journal that day, “the wild north to determine where the river began. They liquorice and sunflower are very abundant in the were hoping to claim land for the United States to plains and river bottoms, the latter is now in full the most northern parallel of the Missouri River blume; the silkgrass and sand rush are also system. Although Lewis did not succeed in staking common.” a claim for more land, he did make significant Scarlet globemallow occurs in dry grassland discoveries that advanced the knowledge of the prairies and plains from Alberta, Saskatchewan, and flora, fauna, ecology, and soils in the area west of Manitoba in Canada, south and eastward to Arizona, the Mississippi River.
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
  • GOOSEBERRYLEAF GLOBEMALLOW Sphaeralcea Grossulariifolia (Hook

    GOOSEBERRYLEAF GLOBEMALLOW Sphaeralcea Grossulariifolia (Hook

    GOOSEBERRYLEAF GLOBEMALLOW Sphaeralcea grossulariifolia (Hook. & Arn.) Rydb. Malvaceae – Mallow family Corey L. Gucker & Nancy L. Shaw | 2018 ORGANIZATION NOMENCLATURE Sphaeralcea grossulariifolia (Hook. & Arn.) Names, subtaxa, chromosome number(s), hybridization. Rydb., hereafter referred to as gooseberryleaf globemallow, belongs to the Malveae tribe of the Malvaceae or mallow family (Kearney 1935; La Duke 2016). Range, habitat, plant associations, elevation, soils. NRCS Plant Code. SPGR2 (USDA NRCS 2017). Subtaxa. The Flora of North America (La Duke 2016) does not recognize any varieties or Life form, morphology, distinguishing characteristics, reproduction. subspecies. Synonyms. Malvastrum coccineum (Nuttall) A. Gray var. grossulariifolium (Hooker & Arnott) Growth rate, successional status, disturbance ecology, importance to animals/people. Torrey, M. grossulariifolium (Hooker & Arnott) A. Gray, Sida grossulariifolia Hooker & Arnott, Sphaeralcea grossulariifolia subsp. pedata Current or potential uses in restoration. (Torrey ex A. Gray) Kearney, S. grossulariifolia var. pedata (Torrey ex A. Gray) Kearney, S. pedata Torrey ex A. Gray (La Duke 2016). Seed sourcing, wildland seed collection, seed cleaning, storage, Common Names. Gooseberryleaf globemallow, testing and marketing standards. current-leaf globemallow (La Duke 2016). Chromosome Number. Chromosome number is stable, 2n = 20, and plants are diploid (La Duke Recommendations/guidelines for producing seed. 2016). Hybridization. Hybridization occurs within the Sphaeralcea genus.
  • COURT of CLAIMS of THE

    COURT of CLAIMS of THE

    REPORTS OF Cases Argued and Determined IN THE COURT of CLAIMS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS VOLUME 39 Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1987 - July 1, 1986-June 30, 1987 SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 1988 (Printed by authority of the State of Illinois) (65655--300-7/88) PREFACE The opinions of the Court of Claims reported herein are published by authority of the provisions of Section 18 of the Court of Claims Act, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 37, par. 439.1 et seq. The Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine the following matters: (a) all claims against the State of Illinois founded upon any law of the State, or upon an regulation thereunder by an executive or administrative ofgcer or agency, other than claims arising under the Workers’ Compensation Act or the Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act, or claims for certain expenses in civil litigation, (b) all claims against the State founded upon any contract entered into with the State, (c) all claims against the State for time unjustly served in prisons of this State where the persons imprisoned shall receive a pardon from the Governor stating that such pardon is issued on the grounds of innocence of the crime for which they were imprisoned, (d) all claims against the State in cases sounding in tort, (e) all claims for recoupment made by the State against any Claimant, (f) certain claims to compel replacement of a lost or destroyed State warrant, (g) certain claims based on torts by escaped inmates of State institutions, (h) certain representation and indemnification cases, (i) all claims pursuant to the Law Enforcement Officers, Civil Defense Workers, Civil Air Patrol Members, Paramedics and Firemen Compensation Act, (j) all claims pursuant to the Illinois National Guardsman’s and Naval Militiaman’s Compensation Act, and (k) all claims pursuant to the Crime Victims Compensation Act.
  • Ted Miles Postcard and Photograph Collection, Circa 1900-1967

    Ted Miles Postcard and Photograph Collection, Circa 1900-1967

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8gt5nrr No online items A guide to the Ted Miles postcard and photograph collection, circa 1900-1967 Processed by: Historic Documents Department Staff: L. Bianchi, M. Crawford, and Amy Croft, 2012; 2015. San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: 415-561-7030 Fax: 415-556-3540 [email protected] URL: http://www.nps.gov/safr 2016 A guide to the Ted Miles postcard P94-023 (SAFR 23265) 1 and photograph collection, circa 1900-1967 A Guide to the Ted Miles postcard and photograph collection P94-023 San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, National Park Service 2016, National Park Service Title: Ted Miles postcard and photograph collection Date: circa 1900-1967 Date (bulk): circa 1959 Identifier/Call Number: P94-023 (SAFR 23265) Creator: Miles, Ted Physical Description: 95 items. Repository: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, Historic Documents Department Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Abstract: The Ted Miles postcard and photograph collection, 1900-1967, bulk circa 1959, (SAFR 23265, P94-023) is comprised of postcards depicting various maritime scenes circa 1900-1967 and photographs of BALCLUTHA (built 1886; ship, 3m: museum ship) docked at Pier 43 for display by the San Francisco Maritime Museum circa 1959. The collection has been processed to the Item level and is open for use. Physical Location: San Francisco Maritime NHP, Historic Documents Department Language(s): In English. Access This collection is open for use unless otherwise noted. Publication and Use Rights Some material may be copyrighted or restricted.

  • VT-9 Trained Aviators First F-35C Pilots to Graduate from TOPGUN

    Volume 58, Number 13 https://www.cnic.navy.mil/meridian ~ www.facebook.com/NASMeridian ~ Twitter: @nasmeridianms June 25, 2020 VT-9 trained aviators first F-35C pilots to graduate from TOPGUN By Gidget Fuentes ing them the tactics, techniques and USNI News procedures that are required for them to successfully employ their aircraft, inte- Two F-35C pilots are the first naval grated into a larger force,” Cmdr. Timo- aviators to graduate from the TOPGUN thy Myers, TOPGUN department head, course flying the fifth-generation Joint said in the release. “We are also in the Strike Fighter, the Navy announced. business of teaching our graduates how Marine Maj. Derek Heinz and Navy to instruct other students, so that when Lt. William Goodwin are among the lat- they go back to the fleet, they are able to est graduates of the Navy Strike Fighter instruct at a very high level.” Tactics Instructor course, run at Naval While TOPGUN had previously grad- Aviation Warfighting Development Cen- uated students who trained to F-35C tac- ter at Naval Air Station Fallon, Nev. tics and procedures, Heinz and Goodwin Heinz is a member of the “Rough Raid- are the first fleet pilots already flying the ers” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) jet to graduate the course, which used a 125, and Goodwin is a member of the syllabus developed from the ground up “Argonauts” of VFA-147, both F-35C specifically for F-35C integrated opera- Lightning II squadrons based at NAS tions, the Navy said. NAWDC has gradu- Lemoore, Calif. ally incorporated F-35C tactics into the Both Heinz and Goodwin trained and training curriculum as the advanced jet earned their “Wings of Gold” at Naval continues to enter the fleet and replace Air Station Meridian through Training aging Navy and Marine Corps fighter air- Squadron 9 (VT-9).
  • Globemallows

    Globemallows

    RANGELANDS15(3), June 1993 127 Globemallows Bruce M. Pendery and Melvin D. Rumbaugh We initiated research on the ecological and forage ona, New Mexico, and Texas have the most species. characteristicsof globemallows(Sphaeralcea) in 1986 Sphaeralcea coccinea is the most widely distributed during a search for beneficialforbs that are well adapted species. to cold desertand steppe rangelands receivingless than Generally, globemallowspecies in the U.S. are peren- 12 inches of precipitation annually. Globemallows are nial, cool-season forbs or half-shrubs (Shaw andMonsen well adapted to such stressful environments. They also 1983, Pendery and Rumbaugh 1986). Most have showy are native species, which may be desired or required in orangeflowers borneon multiple stems that arise from a some situations. basalcrown. However, S. coccinea is moreprostrate and spreadsby rhizomes. In the western U.S. globemallows Characteristics and Ecology grow best in open or disturbed sites (especially road- Globemallows (see cover photos)are in the family Mal- sides) on sandy- to clay-loamsoils, or on gravelly foot- vaceae,which includes species such as cotton, okra, and hills receivingabout 8 to 12 inches of precipitationannu- hollyhock. Sphaeralcea occurs primarily in North and ally (Wasser 1982). Sphaeralcea grossulariifoliais found South America (Kearney 1935). There are 25 globemal- on alkaline soils and tolerates moderate salinity, but it low species on western U.S. rangelands (Table 1). Ariz- does not tolerate sodic soils. Recentwork hasshed lighton globemallowlife-history This article is a cooperativeinvestigation of the USDA-ARS and the Utah Agricultural ExperimentStation, Logan,Utah. Journal PaperNo. 4384. strategies,which may improveour management abilities. Authors are range scientist and retired Research Geneticist, respectively, Under natural conditions establish USDA,Agricultural Research Service, Logan.Utah 84322-6300.
  • Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012

    Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012

    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version June 20, 2012 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation. The articles use a variety of measurements. Some useful conversions: 1”=2.54
  • Naval Air Station Fallon : Nevada

    Naval Air Station Fallon : Nevada

    Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Navy NAVAL AIR STATION FALLON : NEVADA Established in 1942, Naval Air Station (NAS) Fallon is located in the Lahontan Valley of west-central Nevada in the remnants of an ancient lake bed. Because of the arid climate, much of the local area around NAS Fallon is irrigated farmland. NAS Fallon was originally designed as a fallback airstrip to defend against a Japanese strike on the West Coast during World War II. Today it is the Navy’s premier tactical air warfare Above: The Van Voorhis Airfield at NAS Fallon is named after Lieutenant training center, Commander Bruce Avery Van Voorhis, Nevada's only native-born Medal of specializing in air-to-air and air-to-ground training. Fully 80% of all Honor recipient. munitions dropped from Navy aircraft in training land on the Fallon Left: Members of the ground crew at Range Training Complex (FRTC). NAS Fallon is also the Navy’s only NAS Fallon prepare F/A-18C Hornet strike fighters for the final phase of training of a air station capable of supporting an entire carrier air wing at one carrier air wing. (U.S. Navy photo) time. MISSION & VISION STATEMENT To provide the most realistic integrated NAS Fallon's total economic impact is $573 million. air warfare training support available to carrier air wings, tenant commands and individual units participating in training FAST FACTS events, including joint and multinational exercises, while remaining committed to » Location: Churchill County, NV (near Fallon) its assigned personnel. In support of these critical training and personnel » Land Area: 8,600 acres (+ 240,000 acres of FRTC/BLM) requirements, NAS Fallon continually upgrades and maintains the Fallon range » Special Use Airspace: 13,000 square miles complex, the airfield, aviation support facilities and base living/recreation » Sorties/Operations: 51,000 per year accommodations, ensuring deployed unit training and a local quality of life second » Military Personnel: 930 active duty to none.
  • A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: an Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-Life, and Accumulation

    A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: an Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-Life, and Accumulation

    A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: An Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-life, and Accumulation by Jennifer Hallson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology University of Alberta © Jennifer Hallson, 2017 Abstract Promontory Cave 1 on Great Salt Lake, Utah exhibits an incredible level of preservation rarely seen at archaeological sites. The high proportion of perishable materials provides a unique opportunity to study cultural remains that are usually lost to taphonomic processes. Extensive radiocarbon dating has defined a narrow occupation period of ca. 1250-1290 CE (Ives et al. 2014) and the bounded space of the cave allows for confident estimations of the total number of artifacts present. I have completed quantitative analyses that use several methods to study Cave 1 and its inhabitants, including: artifact density, three-dimensional modeling, proportional calculations, accumulation equations, and statistical equations. Archaeologists know surprisingly little about the rates at which artifacts enter the archaeological record and my analyses examine this factor along with related variables such as use-life and accumulation with the above methods. The above methods also allow for inferences to be made on population size, population composition, and occupation span and frequency. Quantitative analyses of the Promontory Cave 1 assemblage can be linked directly to the exploration of Dene migration southward from Canada, as artifacts found in the cave point towards an identity of Apachean ancestors during their migration south. This research also has the potential for much broader application in archaeological investigations by increasing our awareness of what is usually missing; organic artifacts by far dominated past life but are often forgotten during site analysis.
  • USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev

    USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev

    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 MARITIME HERITAGE OF THE UNITED STATES NHL THEME STUDY LARGE VESSELS FERRY BERKELEY Page 1 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Berkeley Other Name/Site Number: Ferry Berkeley 2. LOCATION Street & Number: B Street Pier Not for publication: City/Town: San Diego Vicinity: State: CA County: San Diego Code: 073 Zip Code: 92101 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s):_ Public-local: District:_ Public-State: __ Site: Public-Federal: Structure: X Object:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing ____ buildings ____ sites ____ structures ____ objects Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing: NFS FORM 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 FERRY BERKELEY Page 2 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register criteria.