DOCSLIB.ORG

Complete Nov 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Complete Nov 2013 The Lion Had Wings: The Invention of British Cinema, 1895-1939 Paul Moody A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, March 2013. The Lion Had Wings: The Invention of British Cinema, 1895-1939 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 81,237 words. The Lion Had Wings: The Invention of British Cinema, 1895-1939 2 Abstract Studies of the relationship between British cinema and national identity have tended to focus on the subjects and themes of a select number of films, part of a canon generally agreed to represent the qualities of the British ‘character’. Yet several authors have identified limitations to this approach, and presented a range of theoretical and empirical obstacles to the concept of ‘British cinema’. This problem of provenance has been the mainstay of critical debate about the British film industry since its inception, but in prioritising textual analysis, this interpretation often ignores the additional factors involved in the development of notions of ‘Britishness’. In contrast, this thesis focuses on how the concept of what became known as ‘British cinema’, was created during the early twentieth century, addressing the contextual elements of the cinema experience, and arguing that they were extremely important in determining what ‘British cinema’ would come to represent. Using a range of private papers, government records and marketing materials, I chart the development of the link between ‘British’ cinema and national identity, and the various ways that this concept was presented to the public both in Britain and across the globe. Rather than conceive of this as a definitive form ab initio, I argue that it was a complex process of invention, a myth augmented over time and which was so potent it could accommodate a divergent range of films and filmmakers. Thus, this thesis is not a critique of what British cinema represented, but how it came to represent it. The Lion Had Wings: The Invention of British Cinema, 1895-1939 3 Acknowledgements This dissertation has benefitted from the help and support of a number of people, each of whom offered their time and advice on numerous occasions. The wisdom, guidance and, most importantly, good humour of my supervisor, Professor Alan Sked, were vital to the formation of this work and helped me navigate the inevitable pitfalls of a doctoral degree. Likewise, the constructive criticism of my two examiners, Professor Julian Petley and Professor Ian Christie, was essential to the successful completion of this thesis and I owe these three scholars a great debt of gratitude. To write a piece of work of this length over several years also requires more than just academic input, and the support of my friends, work colleagues and family have been equally important. Their willingness to listen to me discuss the intricacies of British cinema has been a constant delight (for me, if not always them). Most importantly, my partner Helen has helped at every stage of the process, offering advice, correcting typos, and encouraging me to persevere when encountering difficulty. As with most other aspects of my life, this thesis would not have been possible without her love and kindness. The Lion Had Wings: The Invention of British Cinema, 1895-1939 4 Table of Contents Declaration .............................................................................................................2 Abstract ..................................................................................................................3 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................4 Preface: Images of Communion .........................................................................7 Part One: Building a ‘National’ Cinema Chapter One: The Beginning of a ‘British’ Cinema, 1895-1909 .............................22 Chapter Two: Exhibiting ‘Britishness’, 1909-18 ......................................................48 Chapter Three: Marketing ‘Britishness’, 1909-18 ...................................................67 Part Two: The Response to Hollywood Chapter Four: The Post-First World War British Film Industry ...............................89 Chapter Five: Anti-Americanism in the Interwar British Film Industry ....................106 Chapter Six: ‘Trade Follows the Film’ – Cinema and Empire, 1924-28 .................121 Chapter Seven: ‘Films That Lower Our Prestige in India’ ......................................142 Chapter Eight: The Cinematograph Films Act, 1927 .............................................161 Chapter Nine: ‘Our Language in Our Country’ .......................................................171 Chapter Ten: ‘British Rubbish’: The Post-Quota Twenties .....................................184 Part Three: ‘Foreign Pictures With English-Speaking Characters’ Chapter Eleven: ‘British’ Film Production in the Early Thirties ...............................194 Chapter Twelve: Anti-Foreign Sentiment in the 1930s British Film Industry ...........210 Chapter Thirteen: Actions to ‘Maintain and Establish the Industry’ ........................235 Chapter Fourteen: British Cinema Exhibition in the Late Thirties ..........................253 Chapter Fifteen: ‘The Lion Had Wings’, 1936-39 ...................................................265 Conclusion: The Invention of British Cinema .........................................................288 Bibliography ............................................................................................................293 The Lion Had Wings: The Invention of British Cinema, 1895-1939 5 Illustrations and Tables Figure 1: The Logo for the Charles Urban Trading Company ................................32 Figure 2: Cartoon Depicting the Crisis Engulfing the Industry ................................43 Figure 3: Films Passed by the BBFC in the Twelve Months Ended August 1925 ..122 Figure 4: Percentage of British Films Shown in Countries Offering a Tariff Preference, c. 1925 ................................................................................................123 Figure 5: Films Released in the UK by Selected Countries, 1927-1931 ................190 Figure 6: American Distributors of British Films, 1929 and 1932 ...........................192 Figure 7: Employment of Foreign Technicians in the British Film Industry .............222 The Lion Had Wings: The Invention of British Cinema, 1895-1939 6 Preface: Images of Communion In 2006 the UK Film Council produced Stories We Tell Ourselves, a study of the cultural impact of UK film which sought to identify how films addressed issues of national identity and, therefore, how they spoke to the public about the values and interests of the United Kingdom. The framework for assessing cultural impact included marking each film ‘according to whether it predominantly reinforced, challenged, modernised or satirised UK identities, traditions and values.’1 These ‘British values’, based on speeches by the then Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, and the Minister of State for Culture, Creative Industries and Tourism, Margaret Hodge, comprised: tolerance, fair play, decency, honesty, reticence (e.g. about contentious issues such as politics, religion, sexuality) to which might be added understated patriotism, and gallantry or self-sacrifice (in war and in extremis).2 In so doing, the UK Film Council was developing a debate about the nature of what constitutes a ‘British’ film, a discussion that has a lineage stretching back at least as far as the 1927 Cinematograph Films Act, the first official attempt at defining ‘Britishness’ with regard to the cinema. By creating two samples, the first consisting of 200 ‘intuitive’ films (i.e. those most often regarded as part of the British cinema ‘canon’) and the second comprising 200 selected at random, the report’s authors 1 UK Film Council (2009), Stories We Tell Ourselves: The Cultural Impact of UK Film 1946-2006, London: UK Film Council, p. 5. 2 UK Film Council (2009), p. 22. The Lion Had Wings: The Invention of British Cinema, 1895-1939 7 were able to measure to what extent these British films either challenged or reinforced these ‘British values’, and by extension, whether there was a disparity between the commonly held assumptions of what British cinema represents, and what British films actually portrayed. It concluded that the ‘intuitive’ sample tended to challenge ‘British values’, while the random sample favoured reinforcing them. As Stories We Tell Ourselves argued: This suggests that the UK films which have been most highly regarded by critics are those which have challenged and satirised traditional British values, while films that espouse more conventional values have found less critical favour.3 What is most interesting about this finding is that, aside from highlighting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LOOKING at TELEVISION -.:: Radio Times Archive
    10 RMHO TIMES, ISSUE DATED JULY 23, 1937 THE WORLD WE LISTEN IN LISTENERS' LETTERS LOOKING AT TELEVISION (Continued from previous page) S. John Woods discvisses die tech• feeling of actuality is an absolutely fundamental Something for a Change part of television. MAY some of the splendid pianists we hear nique of television and contrasts it Intimacy and actuality, then, are two funda• be asked to play some of the works that are with that of the cinema mentals. A third, just as important, is person• never played ? I instance: Mendelssohn's ality. On the stage we have the living actor Concerto in D minor ; the Rondo Brillante before us, and conversely the actor has a living The Editor does not necessarily agree with by the same composer ; Schumann's Concerto audience before him and can gauge its reception the opinions expressed by his contributors in A minor ; Moszkowski's in E major, and of his acting. In television we have a similar many others. sense of having the actor before us, but for him It is quite true that you cannot have too VERY week some 250 million people visit it is more difficult; instead of having an audi• the cinema. Every year 750 million pounds much of a good thing but, as there are other E ence which he can reduce to laughter or tears, good things, why cannot we hear them played are invested in the production of films. Cinemas there is a forbidding, grey camera and a battery hold from 500 to 3,000 spectators and there by these experts ? One hears the announce• of hot lights.
    [Show full text]
  • Marion Grierson Transcription.Docx
    COPYRIGHT: No use may be made of any interview material without the permission of the BECTU History Project (http://www.historyproject.org.uk/). Copyright of interview material is vested in the BECTU History Project (formerly the ACTT History Project) and the right to publish some excerpts may not be allowed. CITATION: Women’s Work in British Film and Television, Marian Grierson, http://bufvc.ac.uk/bectu/oral- histories/bectu-oh [date accessed] By accessing this transcript, I confirm that I am a student or staff member at a UK Higher Education Institution or member of the BUFVC and agree that this material will be used solely for educational, research, scholarly and non- commercial purposes only. I understand that the transcript may be reproduced in part for these purposes under the Fair Dealing provisions of the 1988 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act. For the purposes of the Act, the use is subject to the following: The work must be used solely to illustrate a point The use must not be for commercial purposes The use must be fair dealing (meaning that only a limited part of work that is necessary for the research project can be used) The use must be accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Guidelines for citation and proper acknowledgement must be followed (see above). It is prohibited to use the material for commercial purposes and access is limited exclusively to UK Higher Education staff and students and members of BUFVC. I agree to the above terms of use and that I will not edit, modify or use this material in ways that misrepresent the interviewees’ words, might be defamatory or likely to bring BUFVC, University of Leeds or my HEI into disrepute.
    [Show full text]
  • Came the Dawn : Memories of a Film Pioneer
    ICIL M. HEPWORTH a film pioneer The Dawn comes to Flicker Alley Still a familiar figure in Wardour Street, Mr. Cecil Hepworth is a pioneer of British Cinema. In his autobiography he has a fascinating story to tell. They were simpler, sunnier days. Hepworth began in the 'showmanship' period in the late 'nineties, carrying his forty-second films to lecture-halls all over the country, where frenzied audiences demanded their repetition many times at a sitting. From the 'fairground' period he helped nurse the cinema to the time of the great Hepworth Company at its Walton-on- Thames studios. To those studios came famous stage actors, men of mark in many fields, anxious to try the new medium. In those studios many 'stars' of yesterday made world-wide reputations: Alma Taylor, Chrissie White, Gerald Ames, Ronald Colman, Violet Hopson, Stewart Rome, names remembered with deep affection four decades later. From Walton-on-Thames films were dispatched in quantity to the world, even to the United States before the Hollywood era. Conditions, if not primitive, were rudi- mentary in the earlier days; the grandiose notions of the industry today were un- dreamt of; and, most marvellous of all, leading actors and actresses played for as little as half a guinea a day (including fares), and were not averse to doing sorting, filing and running errands in their spare time. [ please turn to back flap MANY 16s ILLUSTRATIONS NET bih'iij II. .niij 37417 NilesBlvd §£g A 510-494-1411 Fremont CA 94536 www.nilesfilmnniseum.org Scanned from the collections of Niles Essanay Silent Film Museum Coordinated by the Media History Digital Library www.mediahistoryproject.org Funded by a donation from Jeff Joseph GAME THE DAWN CECIL M.
    [Show full text]
  • Silent Films of Alfred Hitchcock
    The Hitchcock 9 Silent Films of Alfred Hitchcock Justin Mckinney Presented at the National Gallery of Art The Lodger (British Film Institute) and the American Film Institute Silver Theatre Alfred Hitchcock’s work in the British film industry during the silent film era has generally been overshadowed by his numerous Hollywood triumphs including Psycho (1960), Vertigo (1958), and Rebecca (1940). Part of the reason for the critical and public neglect of Hitchcock’s earliest works has been the generally poor quality of the surviving materials for these early films, ranging from Hitchcock’s directorial debut, The Pleasure Garden (1925), to his final silent film, Blackmail (1929). Due in part to the passage of over eighty years, and to the deterioration and frequent copying and duplication of prints, much of the surviving footage for these films has become damaged and offers only a dismal representation of what 1920s filmgoers would have experienced. In 2010, the British Film Institute (BFI) and the National Film Archive launched a unique restoration campaign called “Rescue the Hitchcock 9” that aimed to preserve and restore Hitchcock’s nine surviving silent films — The Pleasure Garden (1925), The Lodger (1926), Downhill (1927), Easy Virtue (1927), The Ring (1927), Champagne (1928), The Farmer’s Wife (1928), The Manxman (1929), and Blackmail (1929) — to their former glory (sadly The Mountain Eagle of 1926 remains lost). The BFI called on the general public to donate money to fund the restoration project, which, at a projected cost of £2 million, would be the largest restoration project ever conducted by the organization. Thanks to public support and a $275,000 dona- tion from Martin Scorsese’s The Film Foundation in conjunction with The Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the project was completed in 2012 to coincide with the London Olympics and Cultural Olympiad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Reality and Fantasy in the Films of Powell and Pressburger: 1939-1946
    The Representation of Reality and Fantasy In the Films of Powell and Pressburger 1939-1946 Valerie Wilson University College London PhD May 2001 ProQuest Number: U642581 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U642581 Published by ProQuest LLC(2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 The Representation of Reality and Fantasy In the Films of Powell and Pressburger: 1939-1946 This thesis will examine the films planned or made by Powell and Pressburger in this period, with these aims: to demonstrate the way the contemporary realities of wartime Britain (political, social, cultural, economic) are represented in these films, and how the realities of British history (together with information supplied by the Ministry of Information and other government ministries) form the basis of much of their propaganda. to chart the changes in the stylistic combination of realism, naturalism, expressionism and surrealism, to show that all of these films are neither purely realist nor seamless products of artifice but carefully constructed narratives which use fantasy genres (spy stories, rural myths, futuristic utopias, dreams and hallucinations) to convey their message.
    [Show full text]
  • German Operetta on Broadway and in the West End, 1900–1940
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 26 Sep 2021 at 08:28:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/2CC6B5497775D1B3DC60C36C9801E6B4 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 26 Sep 2021 at 08:28:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/2CC6B5497775D1B3DC60C36C9801E6B4 German Operetta on Broadway and in the West End, 1900–1940 Academic attention has focused on America’sinfluence on European stage works, and yet dozens of operettas from Austria and Germany were produced on Broadway and in the West End, and their impact on the musical life of the early twentieth century is undeniable. In this ground-breaking book, Derek B. Scott examines the cultural transfer of operetta from the German stage to Britain and the USA and offers a historical and critical survey of these operettas and their music. In the period 1900–1940, over sixty operettas were produced in the West End, and over seventy on Broadway. A study of these stage works is important for the light they shine on a variety of social topics of the period – from modernity and gender relations to new technology and new media – and these are investigated in the individual chapters. This book is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core at doi.org/10.1017/9781108614306. derek b. scott is Professor of Critical Musicology at the University of Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Lawson.Pdf
    Alan Lawson, Cameraman Copyright ACTT History Project September 1987 Interviewer, Arthur Graham Arthur Graham: Where and when were you born? Alan Lawson: I was born in Gidea Park, a suburb of Romford in July 1912, we moved to London 3 years later. Arthur Graham: Whereabouts? Alan Lawson: Hampstead Garden Suburb where I more or less lived ever since. Arthur Graham: What kind of schooling did you receive? Alan Lawson: I went to a small kindergarten for about a term which my father was very fed up about and then I went to the ordinary primary school and from there I went to what is now, then was called the County School Hendon. I think it was Hendon County Grammar School. Something like a grammar school I suppose. There were scholarships and entrance exams, I took the scholarship which I didn't get. I took the entrance exam which I didn't get because I had a brother and a sister at the school they reluctantly took me. Arthur Graham: This was the type of school which took you onto matriculation. Alan Lawson: Yes, which I didn't get actually. Arthur Graham: Did you receive any specialised training, did you go to technical college. Alan Lawson: The only specialised training I had was I had aspirations of being a kind of Bobby Howes so I learned tap and soft shoe dancing with a very well know coach called Matheson Jones who had little school in the Vermalton Pub in Great Portland St and he used to coach Cecily Courtnidge and Jack Hulbert and people like that in his spare time and I was there and that was where I started hopefully to blossom into a Bobby Howes which unfortunately did not come about.
    [Show full text]
  • Nimal Dunuhinga - Poems
    Poetry Series nimal dunuhinga - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive nimal dunuhinga(19, April,1951) I was a Seafarer for 15 years, presently wife & myself are residing in the USA and seek a political asylum. I have two daughters, the eldest lives in Austalia and the youngest reside in Massachusettes with her husband and grand son Siluna.I am a free lance of all I must indebted to for opening the gates to this global stage of poets. Finally, I must thank them all, my beloved wife Manel, daughters Tharindu & Thilini, son-in-laws Kelum & Chinthaka, my loving brother Lalith who taught me to read & write and lot of things about the fading the loved ones supply me ingredients to enrich this life's bitter-cake.I am not a scholar, just a sailor, but I learned few things from the last I found Man is not belongs to anybody, any race or to any religion, an independant-nondescript heaviest burden who carries is the Brain. Conclusion, I guess most of my poems, the concepts based on the essence of Buddhist personal belief is the Buddha who was the greatest poet on this planet earth.I always grateful and admire him. My humble regards to all the readers. www.PoemHunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive 1 * I Was Born By The River My scholar friend keeps his late Grandma's diary And a certain page was highlighted in the color of yellow. My old ferryman you never realized that how I deeply loved you? Since in the cradle the word 'depth' I heard several occasions from my parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Hepworth
    Margaret Hepworth Also Known As: Mrs. Hepworth, Margaret Hope McGuffie, Margarete "McGuffie" Hepworth Lived: 1874 - October 9, 1917 Worked as: family business partner, film actress, screenwriter Worked In: United Kingdom: England by Tony Fletcher Margaret Hope McGuffie was born in 1874 at Charlton in Lancashire, England. By 1900, the family had moved to Chapel-En-Le Frith in Derbyshire, approximately twenty miles from Manchester. One of her brothers, John, who worked as a games master on the steamship The Argonaut had met the filmmaker Cecil Hepworth on board on his way to Algiers to film a solar eclipse. The two men became friends, and when they returned to Britain, Cecil was invited to meet the McGuffie family, who lived not far away from where Cecil was filming for the showman A.D. Thomas. Cecil was advised to wear evening dress for dinner, which was the practice of the McGuffie family. This may explain why in Rescued by Rover (1905), Cecil is seen wearing top-hat and tails. Cecil and Margaret were married at Buxton, Derbyshire, on February 11, 1902. Cecil later recalled in his memoirs Came the Dawn: “I had been married about a year and my wife, broken in to film work, played the part of “The White Rabbit” in Alice in Wonderland” (63). He recalled that the film Rescued by Rover (1905) was a family affair. “My wife wrote the story; my baby, eight months old, was the heroine; my Dog, the hero; my wife, the bereaved mother and myself, the harassed father” (67). The film was shot three times, the second and third version approximately five months after the first version.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources and Bibliography
    RESOURCES aND BIBlIOGRaPHY ARCHIVES, LIBRaRIES & MUSEUmS Barnes Collection, St Ives, Cornwall, England. Barnes Collection, Hove Museum & Art Gallery, Brighton & Hove, England. [concentrates on South Coast of England film-makers and film companies] Brighton Library, Brighton & Hove, England. British Film Institute National Film Library, London, England. [within Special Collections at the BFI is found G. A. Smith’s Cash Book and the Tom Williamson Collection] British Library Newspaper Library, London, England. Charles Urban Collection, National Science & Media Museum, Bradford, England. Hove Reference Library, Brighton & Hove, England. Library of Congress, Washington, USA. Museum of Modern Art, New York, USA. The National Archives, Kew, England. National Park Service, Edison National Historic Site, West Orange, New Jersey. Available online through the site, Thomas A. Edison Papers (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. South Archive South East, University of Brighton, Brighton & Hove, England. University of Brighton Library, St Peter’s House, Brighton & Hove, England. FIlm CaTalOGUES Paul, Robert. 1898. Animated Photograph Films, List No. 15. London. [London: BFI Library] © The Author(s) 2019 279 F. Gray, The Brighton School and the Birth of British Film, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17505-4 280 RESOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY ———. 1901. Animatograph Films—Robert Paul; Cameras, Projectors & Accessories. London. [Paris: La Cinématheque Française] We Put the World Before you by means of The Bioscope and Urban Films. 1903. London: Charles Urban Trading Company. [New York: Museum of Modern Art; Media History Digital Library] Urban Film Catalogue. 1905. London: Charles Urban Trading Company. Republished in, Stephen Herbert. 2000. A History of Early Film, Volume 1. London: Routledge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Picture Show Annual (1928)
    Hid •v Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/pictureshowannuaOOamal Corinne Griffith, " The Lady in Ermine," proves a shawl and a fan are just as becoming. Corinne is one of the long-established stars whose popularity shows no signs of declining and beauty no signs of fading. - Picture Show Annual 9 rkey Ktpt~ thcMouies Francis X. Bushman as Messala, the villain of the piece, and Ramon Novarro, the hero, in " Ben Hut." PICTURESQUE PERSONALITIES OF THE PICTURES—PAST AND PRESENT ALTHOUGH the cinema as we know it now—and by that I mean plays made by moving pictures—is only about eighteen years old (for it was in the Wallace spring of 1908 that D. W. Griffith started to direct for Reid, the old Biograph), its short history is packed with whose death romance and tragedy. robbed the screen ofa boyish charm Picture plays there had been before Griffith came on and breezy cheer the scene. The first movie that could really be called iness that have a picture play was " The Soldier's Courtship," made by never been replaced. an Englishman, Robert W. Paul, on the roof of the Alhambra Theatre in 18% ; but it was in the Biograph Studio that the real start was made with the film play. Here Mary Pickford started her screen career, to be followed later by Lillian and Dorothy Gish, and the three Talmadge sisters. Natalie Talmadge did not take as kindly to film acting as did her sisters, and when Norma and Constance had made a name and the family had gone from New York to Hollywood Natalie went into the business side of the films and held some big positions before she retired on her marriage with Buster Keaton.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Silent Filmmakers in Britain © Luke Mckernan 2007
    Women Silent Filmmakers in Britain © Luke McKernan 2007 WOMEN SILENT FILMMAKERS IN BRITAIN Version 2: 25 November 2007 Luke McKernan This is a filmography of women filmmakers in Britain during the silent era. It was first produced in the late 1990s when I was working at the National Film and Television Archive. It has been updated on occasion since, but it remains a work in progress. Please note that it is a list of all films that were made by these women, not just those that survive – the vast majority are believed to be lost. Please pass on comments or corrections, to lmckernan [at] talktalk.net. Credits act = actress (usually only given when there is a second credit) app = appearance asst d = assistant director cont = continuity ed = editor d = director p = producer pc = production company ph = photographer sc = scriptwriter Mary Marsh Allen Actress whose own production company made a single film 1919 FORGIVE US OUR TRESPASSES [pc/act] Muriel Alleyne Scenarist/scriptwriter 1912 A BOLD VENTURE [story] 1912 AN INDIAN WOMAN'S PLUCK [story] 1912 IN WOLF'S CLOTHING [story] 1913 THE FORSAKEN [story] 1914 THE DEAD HEART [story] 1915 TIME AND THE HOUR [story] 1922 FATTY'S OVERTIME [story] 1922 HIMS ANCIENT AND MODERN [story] 1928 THE CITY OF YOUTH [sc] Balfour, Eve Actress; had her own production company? Ethyle Batley Director with husband Ernest Batley of independent productions and with British and Colonial and Frederick Burlingham 1912 PEGGY BECOMES A BOY SCOUT [d] 1912 PEGGY GETS RID OF THE BABY [d] 1912 THROUGH THE FLAMES [d] 1913 THE
    [Show full text]