Charles Urban and the Early Non-Fiction Film in Great Britain and America, 1897-1925

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charles Urban and the Early Non-Fiction Film in Great Britain and America, 1897-1925 ‘Something More than a Mere Picture Show’ Charles Urban and the Early Non-Fiction Film in Great Britain and America, 1897-1925 Submitted by Luke McKernan to Birkbeck College, University of London as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Film Studies, June 2003 ‘Something More than a Mere Picture Show’ 3. The Eighth Wonder of the World And what shall be said of ‘Kinemacolor’, the eighth wonder of the world? At the outset it was regarded with mistrust and mentioned with dubiousness – just as Daguerre’s first sun-pictures were; just as John Hollingshead’s first searchlight from the roof of the Gaiety Theatre was in ’69; aye, just as the Lords of the Admiralty of Queen Victoria’s girlhood once solemnly reported that steam power could never be of any service in her Majesty’s Navy … The history of its development would read like a page of romance, of seemingly insurmountable problems finally solved …1 While Urban had been building up his career as a producer of documentary and educational films, he had also been nurturing a strong interest in the possibility of natural colour cinematography,2 leading to what became the world’s first successful such system, Kinemacolor. The period 1908-1913, when Kinemacolor flourished, was to see Urban become a public figure of note. Kinemacolor lay at the core of everything Urban wanted to achieve. The Age of Colours In 1909, in an essay surveying the history and philosophy of colour printing, Charles T. Kock declared, ‘This is the age of colours; it is colour everywhere’.3 The inference was that it would be within the memory of the writer, or his audience, when it was not an age of colours. This is not to say, of course, that those of the mid-nineteenth century lived their lives in monochrome, but it was undoubtedly from around 1870 that manufactured colour in the form of illustrations, advertisements, popular prints, posters, magic lantern slides, wallpaper designs and artificial dyes began to make its particular mark on people’s lives in Western society. 1 ‘Junius Junior’, ‘Mayfair Gallery: Men of the Day no. 163 – Mr Charles Urban’, Mayfair, 14 August 1912, p. 996. 2 ‘Natural’ here means images as a photo-chemical record of light, as opposed to ‘artificial’ means of adding colour to film such as hand painting, stencil colour or tinting and toning. 3 Chas. T. Kock, ‘Colour Printing: A Treatise on the Possibilities, History, Philosophy and Technic of the Art’, Penrose’s Pictorial Annual: The Process Year Book - A Review of the Graphic Arts Vol. XIV, 1908-9, p. 100. 122 Chapter 3 – The Eighth Wonder of the World The emergence of colour reproduction in Europe and America can be traced along a number of routes. Particularly significant was the invention of lithography by the Austrian Alois Senefelder in 1796, a means of producing prints from limestone or a metallic plate using a greasy ink. Senefelder experimented with producing colour prints, but it was not until 1837 that the term ‘chromolithographie’ was named in a French patent, and the first chromolithographs were produced in Britain in 1839 and in the United States the following year.4 Chromolithography proved to be a popular and democratising force that brought colour and culture into millions of homes in the form of reproductions of oil paintings between the period 1840-1900. In the words of Peter C. Marzio, ‘At the peak of America’s Victorian age, the mass-produced color lithograph waved unchallenged as the flag of popular culture … Chromolithography was a technical accomplishment with a vibrant social presence’, a phrase that could serve as a fine description for Kinemacolor in its time.5 Such mass-production of ‘high’ culture inevitably brought about a reaction, particularly in response to some of the more garish reproductions that cheaper processes created. Chromolithographs seemed to be emblematic of a dilution of culture through mechanical reproduction, and the snobbish term ‘chromo- civilization’ arose to describe the supposedly meretricious tastes exposed by mass culture. Louis Prang, the most noted and most vocal of American chromolithographers, protested that, ‘the business of this age is to make the products of civilization cheap … what the people want and admire are not the dry bones or the syntax of art, but life pictures, full of the bloom and brilliancy of nature, to brighten their homes and make their own existence more pleasant’, but E.L. Godkin, editor of the elitist journal The Nation responded that ‘the confusion of ideas which assumes that “what the people want and admire” is the same thing as “what the people need and ought to admire” is 4 Peter C. Marzio, The Democratic Art: Chromolithography 1840-1900 – Pictures for a 19th- Century America (Boston: David R. Godine, 1979), p. 6. 5 Marzio, The Democratic Art, p. xi. 123 ‘Something More than a Mere Picture Show’ strange to see’. Chromolithography for Godkin represented a ‘pseudo-culture’ which, taken with other popular media such as newspapers, magazines and lyceum lectures, ‘diffused through the community a kind of smattering of all sorts of knowledge, a taste for “art” – that is, a desire to see and own pictures – which … pass with a large body of slenderly-equipped persons as “culture”, and give them unprecedented self-confidence in dealing with all the problems of life, and raise them in their own minds to a plane on which they see nothing higher, greater or better than themselves’.6 The arguments put forward by Godkin and others were two-fold: that the colours were inherently, and often palpably, inferior to those displayed in the original works; and that a colour work produced mechanically rather than by the hand of the artist was, by definition, a diminution and cheapening of the original. The counter-argument was democratic in sentiment but driven by commercialism. This did not simply mean in terms of the number of units that could be produced. Colour itself was the attraction. The Lithographer’s Journal assessed the effect of the chromolithograph on American popular taste by stating: …within a few decades, public taste has been lifted out of the sluggish disregard for the beautiful … and now seeks to adopt the decorative accessories, which beneficent enterprise has so cheapened as to place them within the reach of all, to the ornamentation of its homes … [T]he depressing monotony of plain walls are [sic] now relieved by bright touches of color … awakening in some degree, however faint, the innate love of beauty which marks the scale of aspiration in the human soul.7 There are, however, two kinds of colour reproductions to be considered here. There is the colour picture in the purely naturalistic sense, which offers an approximately faithful record of nature (or, as was more accurately the case with chromolithographs, a faithful record of a work of art that reproduced 6 Neil Harris, ‘Color and Media: Some Comparisons and Speculations’, in Cultural Excursions, pp. 320-321; Marzio, The Democratic Art, pp. 1-2. 7 ‘Art-Lithography of the United States’, Lithographer’s Journal, September 1893, p. 52, quoted in Marzio, The Democratic Art, p. 5. 124 Chapter 3 – The Eighth Wonder of the World nature), and there is the colour picture where colour itself, to whatever form or degree, is the attraction in itself. These two forms were not mutually exclusive. The attraction, the desirable commodity, was colour. It was seen as something additional to that which had gone before, an enhancement which could denote beauty, superiority, social status or commercial value, according to usage. Colour was truer, better, brighter; colour drew attention to itself. This twin appeal of colour as natural and colour as the subject in itself was central to the exploitation of Kinemacolor. Tom Gunning sets out colour’s ‘contradictory role’ in cinema by stating that on one hand ‘there is the claim, made most explicitly by Bazin’s essay “The Myth of Total Cinema”, that color plays an essential part in the fulfilling of the ideal of cinema’s first inventors, “the reconstruction of a perfect illusion of the outside world in sound, color and relief”’, while on the other, ‘color can also appear in cinema with little reference to reality, as a purely sensuous presence, an element which can even indicate a divergence from reality’.8 The evidence of chromolithography, Kinemacolor, and other media from this period, however, indicates a more complex situation, a desire for reality and super-reality at the same time, which was to a significant extent created by the very limitations of the technical processes that enabled such colours to be reproduced. Kinemacolor and other means of reproducing colour from the some age are part of a key period in modern cultural history, where colour became a recognisable force in how society understood itself at a time of social upheaval and democratising change, how its products were commodified, marketed, owned, displayed and comprehended. It is where salesmanship met both art and science (a natural crossroads for Charles Urban); it is when colour reproduction is equated with social attainment. 8 Tom Gunning, ‘Colorful Metaphors: the Attraction of Color in Early Silent Cinema’, Fotogenia 1: Il Colore nel Cinema/Color in the Cinema, p. 249. 125 ‘Something More than a Mere Picture Show’ The Invention of Kinemacolor The technical history of Kinemacolor has been told elsewhere, though never the complete story.9 Essentially, Urban became interested in colour cinematography when he was approached by in 1901 by Edward Raymond Turner, inventor of a putative three-colour motion picture system, patented on 22 March 1899.10 The Lee and Turner system employed a rotating wheel with red, green and blue sectors positioned on a camera, and a three-lens projector of marked complexity.
Recommended publications
  • German Operetta on Broadway and in the West End, 1900–1940
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 26 Sep 2021 at 08:28:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/2CC6B5497775D1B3DC60C36C9801E6B4 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 26 Sep 2021 at 08:28:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/2CC6B5497775D1B3DC60C36C9801E6B4 German Operetta on Broadway and in the West End, 1900–1940 Academic attention has focused on America’sinfluence on European stage works, and yet dozens of operettas from Austria and Germany were produced on Broadway and in the West End, and their impact on the musical life of the early twentieth century is undeniable. In this ground-breaking book, Derek B. Scott examines the cultural transfer of operetta from the German stage to Britain and the USA and offers a historical and critical survey of these operettas and their music. In the period 1900–1940, over sixty operettas were produced in the West End, and over seventy on Broadway. A study of these stage works is important for the light they shine on a variety of social topics of the period – from modernity and gender relations to new technology and new media – and these are investigated in the individual chapters. This book is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core at doi.org/10.1017/9781108614306. derek b. scott is Professor of Critical Musicology at the University of Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Grieveson Empire & Film Ch
    Grieveson_Empire & Film Ch3 22/6/11 2:20 pm Page 35 3 Sons of Our Empire: Shifting Ideas of ‘Race’ and the Cinematic Representation of Imperial Troops in World War I Toby Haggith and Richard Smith During Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee in 1897, the Illustrated London News observed the ‘curious medley of soldiery representing various races of men, African, Asian, Polynesian, Australasian, and American’ from all over the British empire, gathered at Chelsea barracks to take part in the ceremonies.1 At the height of the imperial era the British empire was recruiting on five continents to fill the ranks of local militias, garrison troops and expeditionary armies. The multiethnic composition of the British army was inextricably linked to colonialism and the imperial project. Prior to colonial expansion, Ireland, Scotland and Wales had been traditional recruiting grounds. From the 1650s African slaves and free blacks were deployed during the conflicts with France and Spain in the Caribbean. By the mid-eighteenth century, the East India Company had established local recruitment to fill the ranks of its armies in the three presidencies. At the turn of the twentieth century, the Royal West Africa Frontier Force and the King’s African Rifles helped to garrison and police Britain’s African possessions. World War I underlined the dependence of the empire on the Indian Army and other non-white units and was clearly an imperial, rather than simply a British effort. For example, over 550,000 members of the Indian Army served overseas, the campaigns in Africa drew on the service of over 1 million carriers during the course of the war and territories as far flung as Fiji and the Bahamas provided contingents.2 The British Army remains a multiethnic force today, despite British-born minority ethnic groups being underrepresented in the ranks.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Lord Fauntleroy
    Little Lord Fauntleroy Little Lord Fauntleroy Frances Hodgson Burnett Illustrations by Peter Bailey ALMA BOOKS alma classics an imprint of alma books ltd 3 Castle Yard Richmond Surrey TW10 6TF United Kingdom www.almaclassics.com Little Lord Fauntleroy first published in 1885–86 This edition first published by Alma Classics Ltd in 2017 Cover and text Illustrations © Peter Bailey, 2017 Extra Material © Alma Classics Ltd, 2017 Printed in Great Britain by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon CR0 4YY isbn: 978-1-84749-635-5 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or other- wise), without the prior written permission of the publisher. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not be resold, lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the express prior consent of the publisher. Contents Little Lord Fauntleroy 1 A Great Surprise 3 Cedric’s Friends 17 Leaving Home 51 In England 60 At the Castle 77 The Earl and His Grandson 105 At Church 136 Learning to Ride 147 The Poor Cottages 160 The Earl Alarmed 169 Anxiety in America 195 The Rival Claimants 211 Dick to the Rescue 224 The Exposure 233 His Eighth Birthday 240 Notes 251 Extra Material for Young Readers 253 The Writer 255 The Book 260 The Characters 262 Unexpected Destinies 266 Test Yourself 269 Glossary 273 Little Lord Fauntleroy 1 a Great surprise edric himself knew nothinG whatever C about it. It had never been even mentioned to him.
    [Show full text]
  • History-Of-The-Moving-Image-LIB-Pd
    tEl:T. n83 MASTERPIECES OF MOVINGIMAGE TECI{NOLOGY SEPTEMBER 10, 1988 _ MARCH 19, 1989 Descri ption! gf_fhq Objects in the Exhibition American Museum of the Moving lmage Edison KinetograPh Camera 1891 ln 1888, Thomas Edison set out to create "an instrument that does for the Eye what the phono- graph does for the Ear...." He assigned the project to one of his engineers, W.K.L. Dickson, who, after a series of false starts, completed the Kinetograph in 1891. The Kinetograph was the first motion picture camera to use the Eastman celluloid f ilm; this was a key breakthrough which made modern motion pic- tures possible. The camera photographed circular images one-half inch in diameter on perforated, f lexible strips of film which moved horizontally through a mechanized sprocket system' The prototype was cannibalized for laboratory use soon after completion, but was partially reconstructed in '1895-96 as evidence in a patent dispute. (Lent by the Edison National Historic Site) <Technician Charles H. Kayser posing with the Kinetograph in Edison's West Orange, New .lersey laboratory, c. 1891 . Edison KinetoscoPe 1894 To exploit his moving pictures commercially, Edison introduced the Kinetoscope, a "peep-show" viewer capable of presenting half-minute film shows. The machines were sold on a territory basis to showmen who installed them in arcades and Kinetoscope Parlors in all the major cities of America and Europe' Commercially, the Kinetoscope was a short-lived novelty, but its appearance directly inspired other inventors to find a way of projecting moving images onto a screen. (Reproduction made by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources and Bibliography
    RESOURCES aND BIBlIOGRaPHY ARCHIVES, LIBRaRIES & MUSEUmS Barnes Collection, St Ives, Cornwall, England. Barnes Collection, Hove Museum & Art Gallery, Brighton & Hove, England. [concentrates on South Coast of England film-makers and film companies] Brighton Library, Brighton & Hove, England. British Film Institute National Film Library, London, England. [within Special Collections at the BFI is found G. A. Smith’s Cash Book and the Tom Williamson Collection] British Library Newspaper Library, London, England. Charles Urban Collection, National Science & Media Museum, Bradford, England. Hove Reference Library, Brighton & Hove, England. Library of Congress, Washington, USA. Museum of Modern Art, New York, USA. The National Archives, Kew, England. National Park Service, Edison National Historic Site, West Orange, New Jersey. Available online through the site, Thomas A. Edison Papers (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. South Archive South East, University of Brighton, Brighton & Hove, England. University of Brighton Library, St Peter’s House, Brighton & Hove, England. FIlm CaTalOGUES Paul, Robert. 1898. Animated Photograph Films, List No. 15. London. [London: BFI Library] © The Author(s) 2019 279 F. Gray, The Brighton School and the Birth of British Film, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17505-4 280 RESOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY ———. 1901. Animatograph Films—Robert Paul; Cameras, Projectors & Accessories. London. [Paris: La Cinématheque Française] We Put the World Before you by means of The Bioscope and Urban Films. 1903. London: Charles Urban Trading Company. [New York: Museum of Modern Art; Media History Digital Library] Urban Film Catalogue. 1905. London: Charles Urban Trading Company. Republished in, Stephen Herbert. 2000. A History of Early Film, Volume 1. London: Routledge.
    [Show full text]
  • YOUR COMPANY Mrougi-I Me YEAR~
    YOUR COMPANY mROUGI-I mE YEAR~ •Trademark Reg. U.S. Pat. Off. RECENTLY DOCTOR KALMUS AT THE BEGINNING ... SUMMARIZED THE HISTORY It was forty years ago on November 19, 1915, that OF TECHNICOLOR Technicolor Motion Picture Corporation was born. It all FOR THE DIRECTORS OF OUR COMPANY started a year or so before that date when Mr. William Coolidge, a prominent attorney and businessman of Bos­ ton, Massachusetts, asked Kalmus, Comstock &Westcott , ------------ Inc., to investigate for him a motion picture projector called Vanascope. Kalmus, Comstock & Westcott was a company formed in 1912 by Dr. Daniel F. Comstock and myself, both graduates of Massachusetts Institute of HIS DISCUSSION REVEALED AN ASTONISHING FACT: Technology and recently returned from obtaining Ph.D. TECHNICOLOR HAS FACED FOUR SERIOUS DEPRESSIONS degrees abroad on fellowships from Massachusetts Insti­ tute of Technology, together with W. Burton Westcott, a AND HAS SURMOUNTED EACH OF THEM mechanical genius. SUCCESSFULLY We reported unfavorably on the Vanascope and a year later, at the request of Mr. Coolidge, we made a -------------- second unfavorable report in which we suggested to him that if he wanted to put money into the motion picture business he raise his sights and aim to put color on the screen. During the consideration of the problems con­ BECAUSE YOU ARE WORKING TODAY nected with Vanascope the ideas which led to the first AT THE BEGINNING OF WHAT WE HAVE EVERY Technicolor camera and process were germinated . CONFIDENCE WILL PROVE TECHNICOLOR'S FIFTH Mr. Coolidge must have enjoyed my statement that GREAT STORY "the most he could lose was all he put into this color mo­ tion picture venture" because he and his partner, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Lord Fauntleroy by Frances Hodgson Burnett 55 Pages Book Report by Julius Eikmans 1A
    Little Lord Fauntleroy By Frances Hodgson Burnett 55 pages Book report by Julius Eikmans 1A Type of story Little Lord Fauntleroy is a fictitious story because it has not really happened. The characters This story has a few characters, they are: Cedric Errol Cedric Errol is a seven year old boy who lives in New York with only his mother, because his father died. Mr Errol Mr Errol is the father of Cedric and the youngest child of the Earl of Dorincourt. Mr. Errol died due to illness. Mrs Errol Mrs Errol is the mother of Cedric and the wife of Mr Errol. The Earl of Dorincourt The Earl of Dorincourt is the father of Mr Errol and Cedric’s grandfather The setting The story takes place in the 1880’s in New York where Cedric and his mother live, and in England where the Earl of Dourincourt lives. The place in important to the story because the characters travel to different places. The time isn’t really important to the story. Summary This story is about Cedric who lives in New York with his mother. The grandfather of Cedric is the Earl of Dorincourt. The Earl of Dorincourt lives in England and he hates Americans. When Cedric’s father moved to America to marry Mrs Errol, the Earl wrote a letter that Cedric’s father isn't his son anymore. He was very angry. The Earl had two more sons, Bevis and Maurice. They both died, had no children and had no wife, so Cedric is the heir. Cedric became the little Lord Fauntleroy now and the and the next Earl of Dorincourt after his grandfather dies.
    [Show full text]
  • FRANCES HODGSON BURNETT Cassette 1, Side 1
    C ASSETTE I NFORMATION FRANCES HODGSON BURNETT Cassette 1, Side 1. (40:13) Cassette 1, Side 2. (39:41) Sara ‘Princess Sara’ Emily Sara’s Birthday Party A French Lesson The Diamond Mines Again A LITTLE Ermengarde Bad News Lottie In the Attic 2 CASSETTES Becky Melchisedec PRINCESS The Diamond Mines Total Time on Cassette 1: 1:19:54 JUNIOR Cassette 2, Side 1. (40:23) Cassette 2, Side 2. (37:52) CLASSICS R EAD BY L UCY W HYBROW Sara had some crumbs in her hand The Visitor The Indian Gentleman ‘It Is the Child!’ Ram Dass ‘I Tried Not to Be’ The Other Side of the Wall Miss Minchin Returns Alone One of the Populace Anne Sara and Ermengarde Total Time on Cassette 2: 1:18:15 Becky Punished Total Time on Cassettes 1&2: 2:38:09 The Magic T HE M USIC The music on this recording is taken from the NAXOS catalog BRAHMS PIANO PIECES Opp 117-119 8.550354 Polish NRSO/Antoni Wit Music programming by Sarah Butcher L UCY W HYBROW Lucy Whybrow’s credits include Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia and Juliet in Romeo and Juliet for the Royal Shakespeare Company. She won the Ian Charleson Award in 1996 for her role in Katie Mitchell’s Easter. For Carnival Films she played Lucy Deane in The Mill On The Floss. For radio she has recorded Dombey and Son and Alice In Wonderland. To receive a complete catalog of our titles now available on both Cassette and CD, please call: 1(877) NAXOS CD • Fax: (888) 771-9520 www.naxos.com 416 Mary Lindsay Polk Drive, Suite 509 • Franklin, Tennessee 37067 Phone: (615) 771-9393 • Fax: (615) 771-6747 In Canada please call: (416) 491-2600 A LITTLE PRINCESS • ISBN 9-62634-754-6 /NA225414 © 2002 NAXOS AudioBooks Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Birt Acres (1854–1918)
    BFI EDUCATION VICTORIAN FILM BIOGRAPHIES BIRT ACRES (1854–1918) Born in Richmond, Virginia to English parents, this American-British filmmaker spent most of his life in London, where he became one of the most important moving-image pioneers of the 1890s. He was the first person to build a working 35mm film camera in Britain, he hosted Britain’s first public film screening, and he invented the first narrow-gauge film system (the Birtac, which used 17.5mm film). Acres started experimenting with filmmaking in February 1895, in partnership with R.W. Paul. A few frames survive of what is now thought to be the first British film, Incident at Clovelly Cottage, filmed in March. Their first commercial production, Oxford and Cambridge Boat Race, was filmed on 30 March, swiftly followed by Rough Sea at Dover, The Arrest of a Pickpocket, The Carpenter’s Shop, Boxing Kangaroo and a record of the Derby horse race held on 29 May 1895. Acres and Paul had very different personalities, and by July their partnership had broken up. The films were intended for viewing in machines similar to Edison’s Kinetoscopes, but Acres also planned to project them on big screens to large audiences. Private demonstrations of his projector were made towards the end of 1895, before a public screening on 10 January 1896, just weeks after the Lumière Brothers demonstrated something similar in Paris. Acres’ achievements could have made him a very rich man, but he believed that moving images should be used for education rather than commercial purposes, and spent the late 1890s lecturing about those possibilities instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow Cinema Programmes 1908-1914
    Dougan, Andy (2018) The development of the audience for early film in Glasgow before 1914. PhD thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/9088/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] The development of the audience for early film in Glasgow before 1914 Andy Dougan Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Culture and Creative Arts College of Arts University of Glasgow May 2018 ©Andy Dougan, May 2018 2 In memory of my father, Andrew Dougan. He encouraged my lifelong love of cinema and many of the happiest hours of my childhood were spent with him at many of the venues written about in this thesis. 3 Abstract This thesis investigates the development of the audience for early cinema in Glasgow. It takes a social-historical approach considering the established scholarship from Allen, Low, Hansen, Kuhn et al, on the development of early cinema audiences, and overlays this with original archival research to provide examples which are specific to Glasgow.
    [Show full text]
  • Intro History Precursors Cinematograph Y Camera
    Intro History Precursors Cinematograph Color y Digital Cinematography Image Sensor + Film Stock Camera Movement Introduction: - The science or art of motion-picture photography. By recording light or other electromagnetic radiation, either electronically by means of an image sensor, or chemically by means of a light-sensi tive material such as film stock. a lens is used to repeatedly focus the light reflected from objects into real images on the light-sensitive surface inside a camera during a questioned exposure, creating multiple images. - History: In the infancy of motion pictures, the cinematographer was usually also the director and the person physically handling the camera. As the art form and technology evolved, a separation between director and camera operator began to emerge. With the advent of artificial lighting and faster (more light sensitive) film stocks, in addition to technological advancements in optics, the technical aspects of cinematography necessitated a specialist in that area. Precursors: 1830’s: Moving images were produced on revolving drums and disks. - 1840’s: - Francis Ronalds Inventor of the first successful camera able to make continuous recordings of the varying indications of meteorological and geomagnetic instruments over time. The cameras were supplied to numerous observatories around the world and some remained in use until well into the 20th century. 1860’s: - William Lincoln patented a device, that showed animated pictures called the "wheel of life" or "zoopraxiscope". In it, moving drawings or photographs were watched through a slit. “Sallie Gardner at a Gallop" by Eadweard Muybridge: - 1878 Eadweard Muybridge successfully photographed a horse named "Sallie Gardner" in fast motion using a series of 24 stereoscopic cameras.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lady of Quality by Frances Hodgson Burnett
    Read and Download Ebook A Lady of Quality... A Lady of Quality Frances Hodgson Burnett PDF File: A Lady of Quality... 1 Read and Download Ebook A Lady of Quality... A Lady of Quality Frances Hodgson Burnett A Lady of Quality Frances Hodgson Burnett A Lady of Quality is a novel published in 1896 by Frances Hodgson Burnett that was the second highest best-selling book in the United States in 1896. It was the first of series of successful historical novels by Burnett. A Lady of Quality Details Date : Published February 14th 2018 by Oregan Publishing (first published 1896) ISBN : Author : Frances Hodgson Burnett Format : Kindle Edition 224 pages Genre : Classics, Historical, Historical Fiction, Fiction, Romance, Gothic Download A Lady of Quality ...pdf Read Online A Lady of Quality ...pdf Download and Read Free Online A Lady of Quality Frances Hodgson Burnett PDF File: A Lady of Quality... 2 Read and Download Ebook A Lady of Quality... From Reader Review A Lady of Quality for online ebook SmartBitches says Full review at Smart Bitches, Trashy Books A Lady of Quality is a romance by Frances Hodgson Burnett, first published in 1896. If the name rings a bell, it’s because Burnett also wrote Little Lord Fauntleroy, A Little Princess, and The Secret Garden. Today Burnett is remembered for her children’s books, but she also wrote a lot of romantic novels for adults, one of which is A Lady of Quality. It features melodrama – so much melodrama. People just don’t make melodrama like they used to. The first thing that you need to know about this book is that it starts off with some really depressing shit.
    [Show full text]