Exhibits: U.S. V. Technicolor Motion Picture Corporation
William C, Dixon, Special Assistant to the Attorney General James M, McGrath, Special Attorney Antitrust DiTision D3pa7T;msLi- of Justjoe 16u2 Ti. Postcffice & Courthouse Los Angeles 12, Clifornia Madison 7411, Extension 285 Attorneys for the Plaintiff IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE W13THERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CENTRAL DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. •o-,^11 TECHNICOLOR, INC., TECHNICOLOR COMPLAINT •. MOTION PICTURE CORPORATION, and ELSTIAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendants. The United States of America, plaintiff, by its attorneys, acting under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, brings this action against the defendants, and complains and alleges as follows JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1, This Complaint is filed and these proceedings are instituted under c. ^6tim 4 of the Act of Congress of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 20q, es amended, entitled 'An Act to ProteA Trade and Commerce against Unlawrul Restraints and Monopolies," commonly known as the Sherman Antitrust Act, end under Section 15 of the Act of Congress of October 15, 1914, a. 323, 38 Stat, 730, as amended, commonly known as the Clayton Act, in order to prevent and restrain c-Jntinuing violations by the defendants, as hereinafter alleged, of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, and of Section 3 of the Clayton Act. 2. Defendants Technicolor Motion Picture Corporation and East- man Kodak Company transact business and are found in the Southern District of California. II DEFINITIONS 3. The words 'professional
[Show full text]