Downloaded from Genbank (Table S1)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
water Article Integrated Taxonomy for Halistemma Species from the Northwest Pacific Ocean Nayeon Park 1 , Andrey A. Prudkovsky 2,* and Wonchoel Lee 1,* 1 Department of Life Science, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.A.P.); [email protected] (W.L.) Received: 16 October 2020; Accepted: 20 November 2020; Published: 22 November 2020 Abstract: During a survey of the siphonophore community in the Kuroshio Extension, Northwest Pacific Ocean, a new Halistemma Huxley, 1859 was described using integrated molecular and morphological approaches. The Halistemma isabu sp. nov. nectophore is most closely related morphologically to H. striata Totton, 1965 and H. maculatum Pugh and Baxter, 2014. These species can be differentiated by their nectosac shape, thrust block size, ectodermal cell patches and ridge patterns. The new species’ bracts are divided into two distinct types according to the number of teeth. Type A bracts are more closely related to ventral bracts in H. foliacea (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833) while Type B bracts are more similar to H. rubrum (Vogt, 1852). Each type differs, however, from the proximal end shape, distal process and bracteal canal. Both of the new species’ morphological type and phylogenetic position within the genus Halistemma are supported by phylogenetic analysis of concatenated DNA dataset (mtCOI, 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA). Integrated morphological and molecular approaches to the taxonomy of siphonophores showed a clear delimitation of the new species from the congeners. Halistemma isabu sp. nov. is distributed with the congeners H. rubrum, H. cupulifera, H. foliacea and H. striata in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Keywords: zooplankton; jellyfish; mitochondria; systematics; hydrozoa 1. Introduction Siphonophores, belonging to the class Hydrozoa Owen, 1843, live in oceans and are mostly holoplanktonic organisms [1]. Approximately, 190 species have been described as siphonophores, though there are likely more in the marine environment [2]. Siphonophores have gelatinous bodies and form unique colonies throughout their life [3]. Each individual in a colony has a variety of functions and morphological characteristics [4]. Siphonophorae are traditionally classified into three suborders (Calycophorae Leuckart, 1854; Cystonectae Haeckel, 1887; Physonectae Haeckel, 1888) depending on the presence of a gas bubble float, called a pneumatophore, and medusoids, known as nectophores [1,5,6]. Approximately 65 species with pneumatophores and nectophores are recognized as Physonectae [7]. Physonects’s descriptions are often incomplete because Siphonophores have fragile gelatinous bodies and many research records are based on dissociated specimens, where only a few nectophores or bracts were collected [1,8]. Morphological changes throughout their life cycle, phenotypic plasticity and cryptic species are also responsible for erroneous species diversity estimations. Molecular methods can be used for species identification, reconstructing life cycles, and clarifying phylogeny [2,8–13]. Molecular data show that Cystonectae and Calycophorae are monophyletic taxa while Physonectae is polyphyletic [2,8]. Some families, such as Apolemiidae Huxley, 1859 and Pyrostephidae Moser, 1925, are not included in the clade unifying physonects and Calycophorae. Most physonects, however, can be combined into the monophyletic clade Euphysonectae. This includes Agalmatidae, Physophoridae Water 2020, 12, 3283; doi:10.3390/w12113283 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Water 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 21 includes Agalmatidae, Physophoridae Eschscholtz, 1829, Forskaliidae Haeckel, 1888 and other Waterfamilies2020 ,[2].12, 3283General Physonectae systematics and phylogenetic affinities of some genera are under2 of 18 debate. Eschscholtz,Agalmatidae 1829, Forskaliidaeis the most Haeckel,specious 1888 family and within otherfamilies the Physonectae. [2]. General The Physonectae family’s diversity systematics is andlimited phylogenetic to five genera affinities (Agalmatidae of some genera sensu arestricto under) including debate. short-stem (Athorybia Eschscholtz, 1829 and MelophysaAgalmatidae Haeckel, is the 1888) most and specious long-stem family (Agalma within Eschscholtz, the Physonectae. 1825, Halistemma The family’s Huxley, diversity 1859, is limitedNanomia to A. five Agassiz, genera 1865) (Agalmatidae genera [6,7,14].sensu stricto The )short-stem including short-stemgenus Athorybia (Athorybia, withEschscholtz, no nectophores, 1829 was and MelophysapreviouslyHaeckel, classified 1888) outside and long-stemof the Agalmatidae. (Agalma Eschscholtz, However, 1825, molecularHalistemma data Huxley,show they 1859, areNanomia likely A.neotenic Agassiz, relatives 1865) genera of the Agalma [6,7,14]. species The short-stem [2,8,14]. Melophysa genus Athorybia melo (Quoy, with and no nectophores, Gaimard, 1827) was has previously a spiral classifiedsiphosome outside and tricornuate of the Agalmatidae. tentilla and However, is related molecular to Athorybia datashow and Agalma they are species likely neotenic [14]. Long-stem relatives ofagalmatids the Agalma (Agalmaspecies, Halistemma [2,8,14]. Melophysa, Nanomia melo) include(Quoy monoecious and Gaimard, species 1827) with has dorsal a spiral nectosoma siphosome and and a tricornuatedescending tentillamantle andcanal is in related its nectophores to Athorybia [6,7,14].and Agalma The agalmatidspecies [14 genera]. Long-stem are delimited agalmatids based (Agalma on the, Halistemmanectophores’, Nanomia shape, ridge) include pattern, monoecious and tentilla species type. with Nevertheless, dorsal nectosoma these morphologic and a descending differences mantle and canaltaxonomic in its nectophoresboundaries [were6,7,14 only]. The generalize agalmatidd generain a short are delimitedMapstone based (2015) on [7] the review. nectophores’ Halistemma shape,, ridgewhich pattern, we address and tentillain this type.paper, Nevertheless, is a genus establis these morphologiched by Huxley di ff(1859)erences [15]. and It taxonomichas a long boundariestaxonomic werehistory only which generalized Pugh and in Baxter a short (2014) Mapstone [16] recently (2015) [7 ]reviewed. review. Halistemma A total of ,six which Halistemma we address species in thisare paper,known. is a genus established by Huxley (1859) [15]. It has a long taxonomic history which Pugh and BaxterIn (2014)this study, [16] recently we describe reviewed. a new A Halistemma total of six speciesHalistemma foundspecies in the areNorthwest known. Pacific Ocean. Our descriptionIn this uses study, morphological we describe characteristics a new Halistemma and aspecies three-gene found molecular in the Northwestapproach. Pacific Ocean. Our description uses morphological characteristics and a three-gene molecular approach. 2. Materials and Methods 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Sample Collections 2.1. Sample Collections Plankton samples were collected in October 2019 during a R/V ISABU cruise in the Kuroshio ExtensionPlankton (Figure samples 1). We were used collected a Multiple in OctoberOpening/Closing 2019 during Net a and R/V Environmental ISABU cruise inSensing the Kuroshio System Extension(MOCNESS, (Figure 1 × 11 m²,). We mesh used size: a Multiple 200 µm) Opening towed between/Closing 200 Net m and and Environmental the surface. Immediately Sensing System after (MOCNESS,towing, we 1split1 mplankton2, mesh size:samples 200 µ m)into towed 1/2 aliquots between 200using m anda Folsom the surface. plankton Immediately splitter. afterFor × towing,morphological we split observation, plankton samples one aliquot into 1/ 2was aliquots fixed using in neutralized a Folsom plankton5% formalin splitter. solution For morphological and stored at observation,room temperature. one aliquot For wasfuture fixed molecular in neutralized analysis, 5% we formalin fixed solutionthe other and aliquot stored in at 99.9% room temperature.ethanol and Forstored future at 4 molecular °C. All material analysis, was we fixeddeposited the other at the aliquot National in 99.9% Institute ethanol of andBiological stored atResources 4 ◦C. All material(NIBR), wasKorea’s deposited invertebrate at the Nationalcollection. Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), Korea’s invertebrate collection. Figure 1.1. Map of sampling stations. (QGIS, Version: 3.6.0). Water 2020, 12, 3283 3 of 18 2.2. Morphological Analysis For morphological observation, specimens were sorted from 5% neutralized formalin plankton samples using a Live Insect Forceps (26029-10, Fine Science Tools Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) and a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZX7, Tokyo, Japan). We placed sorted specimens in 20 mL glass vials with the formalin solution at room temperature. We observed specimens on a Petri dish (Ø: 5 cm) filled with 5% neutralized formalin solution under the stereomicroscope. We identified all specimens using descriptions and illustrations from Kirkpatrick and Pugh (1984) [17], Mapstone (2009) [18], Totton (1954) [19], Totton and Bargmann (1965) [1] and Pugh and Baxter (2014) [16] and used Pugh and Baxter (2014) [16] terminology. Digital photographs of specimens were taken using a digital camera (Olympus PEN Lite E-PL3, Tokyo, Japan) connected to the stereomicroscope with side lights on the dark field. We took the digital photographs at various focal points and performed multi-focus stacking using Helicon Focus 7 software (Version: 7.5.1). We cropped the photographed objects and moved them to a