Higher-Level Phylogeny of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): Mtdna Data Support a Derived Placement for Toxorhynchites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Higher-Level Phylogeny of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): Mtdna Data Support a Derived Placement for Toxorhynchites Higher-level phylogeny of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): mtDNA data support a derived placement for Toxorhynchites ANDREW MITCHELL, FELIX A. H. SPERLING and DONAL A. HICKEY Insect Syst Evol Mitchell, A., Sperling, F. A. H. & Hickey, D. A.: Higher-level phylogeny of mosquitoes · · (Diptera: Culicidae): mtDNA data support a derived placement for Toxorhynchites. Insect Syst. Evol. 33: 163-174. Copenhagen, July 2002. ISSN 1399-560X. We assess the potential of complete coding sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxi­ dase genes (COl and COil) and the intervening tRNA-Leucine gene for use in mosquito high­ er-level systematics, and apply this data to an outstanding question: the phylogenetic affinities of Toxorhynchites. Traditionally placed in its own subfamily and regarded as sister group to Culicinae, recent morphological data instead have suggested that this distinctive genus belongs well within the Culicinae. Published molecular systematic studies seemingly conflict with this new morphological data or are ambiguous. The mitochondrial gene data that we pres­ ent show good potential for elucidating suprageneric relationships in Culicidae, and strongly support the placement of Toxorhynchites well within the Cnlicinae. Reexamination of pub­ lished data sets suggests that there is no substantive conflict among data sets on this issue. Andrew Mitchell, School of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Natal, Private Bag XOl, Scottsville, 3209, South Africa ([email protected]). Felix A. H. Sperling, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada ([email protected]). Donal A. Hickey, Department of Biology, University .of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, KlN 6N5, Canada ([email protected]). Introduction tionships among subfamilies by Harbach & Mosquito taxonomy has received intense attention Kitching ( 1998). However, their novel results have as a direct result of the immense medical impor­ yet to gain wide acceptance. This is largely be­ tance of many mosquitoes as vectors of disease­ cause of apparent conflict between their data and causing organisms. The realisation that accurate published data sets, both morphological and delimitation of species boundaries and an in-depth molecular. In this study we assess the potential of knowledge of geographic variation are essential . mitochondrial DNA sequence data for resolving for vector control has resulted in a focus on spe­ contentious issues in mosquito higher-level sys­ cies-level taxonomy in Culicidae. The higher-level tematics by examining the phylogenetic placement phylogeny of Culicidae is much more poorly of Toxorhynchites. understood. Among the reasons for this is the im­ Recent classifications of Culicidae recognize portance of nomenclatural stability in this impor­ three subfamilies: Anophelinae, with 3 genera, tant group, which understandably has led to con­ Culicinae, with 34 genera arranged in 10 tribes, -servative nomenclature. One could also argue, and Toxorhynchitinae, with a single genus, Toxo­ however, that the widespread importance of mos­ rhynchites. The distinctiveness of Toxorhynchites quitoes is in itself a strong motivation for provid­ was recognized early on, because the species are ing an up-to-date classification that more closely among the largest and most spectacular of all mos­ reflects phylogeny. Nevertheless, the earlier phe­ quitoes. Toxorhynchites females do not take blood netic work has largely pre-empted later cladistic meals, and oviposit in small, natural plant contain­ studies, and most systematists have followed the ers where the larvae are predatory (Steffan & classification of Edwards (1932) with little modi­ Evenhuis 1985). Toxorhynchites species have even fication. Rigorous phylogenetic methodology has been used as biological control agents of other only recently been applied to the problem of rela- mosquitoes, though with limited success (Steffan © Insect Systematics & Evolution (Groups 6 & 7) 164 Mitchell, A. et al. INSECT SYST. EVOL. 33:2 (2002) & Evenhuis 1981). Despite these differences, a material are listed in Tab. 1. Specimens were col­ few authors considered the apparent peculiarity of lected in the wild or taken from laboratory the Toxorhynchitinae to have been overempha­ colonies and then either frozen live at -70°C or sized. Belkin (1962), for example, treated the preserved a few days in 95% ethanol before being group as a tribe of equal rank to the ten tribes of frozen at -70°C. Identifications of wild-collected Culicinae, and considered them closely related to material were provided by D. M. Wood {Agri­ the Sabethini. This hypothesis was supported by culture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada). Harbach & Kitching's (1998) morphology-based Our taxon sample included eleven mosquito cladistic analysis of all mosquito genera. species, including four anophelines, five culicines Molecular data, in contrast, have seemingly sup­ (from four tribes), and two toxorhynchitines. The ported the traditional placement of Toxorhynchites outgroup comprised two species, including a rep­ (Besansky & Fahey 1997) or have been equivocal resentative of Chaoboridae, most likely the sister (Miller et al. 1997).~ group of Culicidae (Oosterbroek & Courtney Which of these alternative placements for 1995) or at least very closely related (Pawlowski Toxorhynchites is better supported? We present et al. 1996), and a more distantly related culico­ sequence data .of the complete mitochondrial morph (a blackfly, Simuliidae). Published se­ cytochrome oxidase genes, COI and COil, and the quences .were obtained from GenBank for Ano­ intervening tRNA-Leucine gene (a total of 2.3kb ), pheles quadrimaculatus (Mitchell et al. 1993) and in order to assess the utility of these genes for A. gambiae (Beard et al. 1993). All other se­ mosquito higher-level phylogenetics, and to pro­ quences are new data. vide additional data bearing on this problem. Laboratory protocols. - For most specimens, DNA was extracted from individual specimens Materials and methods using a phenol!chloroform procedure as described by Sperling et al. (1994). For two specimens (Sa­ Abbreviations. - CO, cytochrome oxidase; GTR, bethes L-yaneus and Toxorhynchites sp.) DNA was general time reversible; ML, maximum likelihood; extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Tissue Kit MP, maximum parsimony; mp, most parsimonious. (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, California). PCR was Taxon sampling. - Taxa sampled and sources of accomplished using the protocol of Sperling et al. Table 1. Taxon sampling. Taxon Source• Culicidae Anophelinae Anopheles (Anopheles) earlei Ottawa, Canada; D. M. Wood AF425843 Anopheles (Anopheles) quadrimaculatus Mitchell et al. (1993) NC000875 Anopheles (Cellia) gambiae Beard et al. ( 1993) NC002084 Anopheles (Cellia) stephensi LC, University of Maryland; V. Kulasekara AF425844 Culicinae Aedes atropalpus LC, University of Ottawa; T. Amason AF425845 Aedes aegypti LC, University of Ottawa; D. Hickey AF425846 Culex tarsalis LC, Queens University; V. Walker AF425847 Culiseta impatiens Ottawa, Canada; D. M. Wood AF425848 Sabethes cyaneus LC, University of Notre Dame; N. Besansky AF425840 Toxorhychitinae Toxorhynchites rutilus York Co., Pennsylvania; D. M. Wood AF425849 Toxorhynchites sp. Vietnam; D.C. Currie AF425850 Chaoboridae Chaoborus sp. Ottawa, Canad~; D. M. Wood AF425842 Simuliidae Cnephia dakotensis Ottawa, Canada; D. M. Wood AF425841 •LC =Laboratory colony bThe complete alignment is also available from TreeBase (http://www.herbaria.harvard.edultreebase/). INSECT SYST. EVOL. 33:2 (2002) (1994). the end primers TY-J-1460 (=K698: pe1formed using identical protocols. All phyloge­ 5' -TAC AAT ITA TCG CCT AAA CIT CAG CC netic analyses were performed PAUP* ver­ and TK-N-3782 5'- GAG ACC AIT sions 4.0b4a and 4.0b8 Altivec (Swofford 1999). ACT TGC ITT CAG TCA TCT -3') and a variety lnc:on:gruem:e length difference (ILD) tests of primers developed by us consisted of 1000 heuristic from a comparison of GenBank sequences of etitions, each with 10 random addition sequelltces Vrt?sn.vmta yakuba, gambiae, and A. of taxa. A branch-and-bound maximum parsimony quadrimaculatus. For Cnephia. da- (MP) search was performed on our rntDNA data kotensis, Chaoborus sp., and Sabethes cyaneus, set. Further MP on our and all other the above end primers did not amplification MP analyses, of 1000 random addition products. For these taxa we developed far- sequences of ther out from the COIICOIT region. upstream sequences and, in primer used for Cnephia and Sabetl}.es was TW-J- genes, also on the inferred amino acid seaner1ces 1305 5'- GIT AAA TAAA'CT AAT AGC (740 characters). analyses CIT CAA AGC TG -3') and for Chaoborus was 1000 repetitions, each with 10 random addition TY-J-14601 5'-ITACAATTTCTTACT sequences of taxa. Constraint searches were car­ TAA GTT CAG CC -3'). The downstream ried out for each data set to determine the number used for both and Chaoborus was of additional steps needed to accommodate alter­ 3862 (5'- GGC CGT CTG ACA AAC TAA TGT native phylogenetic hypotheses. Bremer support TAT -3') from Simonet al. (1994). For most spec­ (or 'decay') indices (Bremer 1988) were calculat­ imens PCR · were sequenced directly ed for the morphological data set & Kit- using the Taq DyeDeoxyT111 Terminator Cycle 1998). Se(tUeJ:tciilg System (Applied Biosystems, Inc.) To assess the effects of biased base composition and fractionated on an ABI 373 automated DNA oh1vlo:£!:el1tV reconstruction we dis- sequencer. For two specimens ana!vs<~s based on the LogDet et
Recommended publications
  • A Mosquito Psorophora Ciliata (Fabricius) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Ephraim V
    EENY-540 A Mosquito Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Ephraim V. Ragasa and Phillip E. Kaufman2 Introduction For additional information on mosquitoes, see http://edis. ifas.ufl.edu/IN652. Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius) is a large mosquito (Cutwa and O’Meara 2005) that has developed an outsized reputa- tion because of its relatively intimidating heft and persistent Synonymy biting behavior (Gladney and Turner 1969), including Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius 1794) anecdotal historical accounts of its legendary aggressiveness Culex ciliata Fabricius (1794) (Wallis and Whitman 1971) and ‘frightening appearance’ Culex conterrens Walker (1856) (King et al. 1960). The ‘gallinipper’ or ‘shaggy-legged Culex molestus Weidemann (1820) gallinipper’ was used as a common name for Psorophora Culex rubidus Robineau-Desvoidy (1827) ciliata in various published reports (Ross 1947; King et al. Psorophora boscii Robineau-Desvoidy (1827) 1960; Breeland et al. 1961; Goddard et al. 2009). The term Psorophora ctites Dyar (1918) was mentioned much earlier by Flanery (1897) describing (From ITIS 2011) the mosquito as ‘the little zebra-legged thing—the shyest, slyest, meanest, and most venomous of them all’ [sic] but Distribution did not specify what species it was. The word gallinipper Psorophora ciliata usually is associated with other flood- originated as a vernacular term in the southeastern region water mosquitoes, including many species from the Aedes of the United States referring to ‘a large mosquito or other genera (Breeland et al. 1961), and has a wide distribution insect that has a painful bite or sting’ and has appeared in the New World. Floodwater mosquitoes often lay in folk tales, traditional minstrel songs, and a blues their eggs in low-lying areas with damp soil and grassy song referencing a large mosquito with a ‘fearsome bite’ overgrowth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquitoes of Alaska
    LIBRAR Y ■JRD FEBE- Î961 THE U. s. DtPÁ¡<,,>^iMl OF AGidCÜLl-yí MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U < The purpose of this handbook is to present information on the biology, distribu- tion, identification, and control of the species of mosquitoes known to occur in Alaska. Much of this information has been published in short papers in various journals and is not readily available to those who need a comprehensive treatise on this subject ; some of the material has not been published before. The information l)r()UKlit together here will serve as a guide for individuals and communities that have an interest and responsibility in mosquito problems in Alaska. In addition, the military services will have considerable use for this publication at their various installations in Alaska. CuUseta alaskaensis, one of the large "snow mosquitoes" that overwinter as adults and emerge from hiber- nation while much of the winter snow is on the ground. In some localities this species is suJBBciently abundant to cause serious annoy- ance. THE MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA By C. M. GJULLIN, R. I. SAILER, ALAN STONE, and B. V. TRAVIS Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued January 1961 For «ale by the Superintendent of Document«. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 45 cent» Contents Page Page History of mosquito abundance Biology—Continued and control 1 Oviposition 25 Mosquito literature 3 Hibernation 25 Economic losses 4 Surveys of the mosquito problem. 25 Mosquito-control organizations 5 Mosquito surveys 25 Life history 5 Engineering surveys 29 Eggs_".
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson-Nicola Regional District Nuisance Mosquito
    THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT NUISANCE MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM 2011 YEAR-END REPORT Prepared by: ___________________________ Burke Phippen, BSc., RPBio. Project Manager ___________________________ Cheryl Phippen, BSc., RN Field Coordinator NOVEMBER, 2011 BWP CONSULTING INC. 6211 Meadowland C res S, Kamloops, BC V2C 6X3 2011 Thompson-Nicola Regional District Mosquito Control Program Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM ................................. 5 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ......................................................................................... 5 2.1. SNOW PACK .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1. TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION .......................................................................... 7 2.2. FLOW LEVELS ............................................................................................................ 9 3.0 LARVICIDING PROGRAM ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control
    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 4537-4605; doi:10.3390/ijerph9124537 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN 1660-4601 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Article North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control Jorge R. Rey 1,*, William E. Walton 2, Roger J. Wolfe 3, C. Roxanne Connelly 1, Sheila M. O’Connell 1, Joe Berg 4, Gabrielle E. Sakolsky-Hoopes 5 and Aimlee D. Laderman 6 1 Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory and Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida-IFAS, Vero Beach, FL 342962, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (S.M.O.C.) 2 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Franklin, CT 06254, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Biohabitats, Inc., 2081 Clipper Park Road, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project, Yarmouth Port, MA 02675, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 6 Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-772-778-7200 (ext. 136). Received: 11 September 2012; in revised form: 21 November 2012 / Accepted: 22 November 2012 / Published: 10 December 2012 Abstract: Wetlands are valuable habitats that provide important social, economic, and ecological services such as flood control, water quality improvement, carbon sequestration, pollutant removal, and primary/secondary production export to terrestrial and aquatic food chains. There is disagreement about the need for mosquito control in wetlands and about the techniques utilized for mosquito abatement and their impacts upon wetlands ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Proorarol Hoolor, OHO Also Contains an Illustrated Taxonomic Voy to 1' St,Rries of Anonheline Larvae
    DOCTIMFVT RFSUMF FP 011. bU4 010 hug Tratt, Farry P. olanovici-, Chr-trr 3. Vorkook or thc T(lcntificati.or of Arotl--0,,E /Arva. Frolim3nary TssuP. "757-7TT1770!: National Cor,munical,le r'isqarr Cor,tc'rU.T1"V), Atlanta, C.a. r'' ft 'Ar-7 rF. ,T117.-r frn. F'TCH Frrq ?rico "17-4n.'70 VC-.Lr) 7)",C77nTr" Autoinstructional Ai6s, *Tiolooy, rrtonloiv, Occunators Flucatior, e-rt!F;tructionAl tcrials, *Prouramerl !,"atcrials, Public "caltl, *-axonory APFTI'AC- This self-insfructional hooklot el«.7i_on(,1 to crahlo malarial control workors to iArntify the larvAr of "rnol'v'r1,*" snociPs that arc imnor+art ralaria vectors. -0 feat -urns of 410 larvae aro illustratoA in 9 proorArol hoolOr, OHO also contains an illustrated taxonomic voy to 1' st,rries of anonheline larvae. olossary and asl-,ort 1,ihliortrary arm (PI) ,,,. ,-,,;. ,:"-.4. - . .'?' ::,-,..1,..- -''' '''',-,'-,.' '-'.-:' '- - -..'.--. --.. '... , , . ,. -..,--: .,-, ','''.:-5.f'1.if!.''' f*.c' ,',,',--''.. ,t ',...','', ''. .,....,, ,. ,r.,. re ,, , ;' , .'s,''../,' ,' 4;',1-!,--17.0"t ' k c'-- i;,' -...-:' '.,;'".4. ,...'',... ''.*,',...'' .:ff' 4 , , ,',.';'. -(:;',. "-0 ...,...".."4.,!, ,.,, ,1"..,'', ''4'.' ' P''''''''-' '' ,:44.,./A t;;A:-.,, , . , , ..,. f- . I....., t'' ''...'1'.'''.:''') , "..f A '. -,;1 ,4.: , '4> ,r . .:,11 ."' t A.'.'.'e -,', .1...."'1".'L.'"`.. -. ' , 4 ,0 , i, i ' ''. .4 ; .1' i'''',. '. ." 5.' '''':): ...17;' '-!:,, 44''''''''''41I' ''' ';'°Ii , ,!.11,7, ' : . ' ,',1 o ), %' ' 11', , 1, , RKBOOK ON THkIDENTIFICATION):'...,% :c4F.y! '1;- .,. ANOPHELES LA V I `4"ie' 4- 51 i k. 4 5t , ,t; I4 '1 .! f.1if",fi ' 4 *"*4*"1 ) 4, , ", .."4' : '' r " . c , ., . , % .; r ,; . , f./ . 4, .;!4;.:; )4: r .1.4 '" .:; . ,..- 4,''"' . ..,-, , jj 4' ,C. -',..; . /* 4. ',.! 4/ ,.'0, . '. ' ''*. ',"' '',... '.0, 7'.........10'' 00 4,- -t,p 'Jos,*".
    [Show full text]
  • This Work Is Licensed Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. QUAESTIONES ENTOMOLOGICAE A periodical record of entomological investigation published at the Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Volume 5 Number 4 27 October 1969 CONTENTS Graham — Observations on the biology of the adult female mosquitoes (Diptera:Culicidae) at George Lake, Alberta, Canada 309 Fredeen — Outbreaks of the black fly Simulium arcticum Malloch in Alberta 341 OBSERVATIONS ON THE BIOLOGY OF THE ADULT FEMALE MOSQUITOES (DIPTERA:CULICIDAE) AT GEORGE LAKE, ALBERTA, CANADA PETER GRAHAM Department of Biologylogy Thomas More College Quaestiones entomologicae Covington, Kentucky 41017 5: 309-339 1969 The seasonal distribution of the more important mosquito species is discussed. No species was found to be particularly abundant inside buildings and mosquitoes did not appear to enter buildings to digest their blood meals, but appear to digest these near the feeding site. A significant difference was found between the occurrence of certain species at the lake shore and in the forest. Mosquitoes were found to be relatively inactive when in stages II-IV of Christophers and 3-5 of Sella of the gonotrophic cycle. Retention of eggs by parous females was found to be widespread and to occur in 7% of the parous females. A key to the adult female mosquitoes of central Alberta is given. During studies comparing the effectiveness of different mosquito sampling methods at the George Lake field site, in 1965, 1966 and 1967, a number of observations on the biology of the adult female mosquitoes was made.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Dispersal Behaviour and Spatial Distribution Modelling of Adult Mosquitoes in the Winnipeg Region
    LONG-RANGE DISPERSAL BEHAVIOUR AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION MODELLING OF ADULT MOSQUITOES IN THE WINNIPEG REGION BY MARTINE ELYSE BALCAEN The University of Winnipeg Department of Biological Sciences Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Science in Bioscience, Technology and Public Policy December 2020 Copyright © 2020 Martine Elyse Balcaen i ABSTRACT Mosquitoes are present in virtually every nation worldwide, acting as both a vector for many serious pathogens, and as a nuisance because of their blood-feeding behaviours. As a principle of Integrated Mosquito Management (IMM), pre-emptive rather than reactive mosquito control measures are recommended and have been shown to be effective in suppressing mosquito populations. However, pre-emptive actions require insight into the spatial dynamics of mosquitoes to be effective, as mosquito dispersal behaviour is broadly influenced by local environmental conditions and species physiology. This research project was designed to investigate the dispersal behaviour and landscape ecology of adult mosquitoes in the Winnipeg region in central Canada. In Manitoba, mosquitoes primarily present an annoyance rather than a public health risk, though a risk of exposure to several mosquito-borne diseases persists in southern Manitoba. As part of the Winnipeg’s long-standing IMM program, the city maintains a mosquito control buffer zone extending approximately 10 km beyond the city limits. Within this zone, a surveillance program is implemented for adult and larval mosquitoes and larviciding operations occur when necessary. However, there is a lack of local evidence to justify the size of this zone, and literature addressing the establishment of effective buffer zones for mosquito control is nearly non-existent.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Canadian Mosquito Species Through DNA Barcodes
    Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2006) 20, 413–424 Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes A. CYWINSKA 1 , F . F . HUNTER 1 a n d P . D . N . HEBERT 2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada and 2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada Abstract . A short fragment of mt DNA from the cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1) region was used to provide the first CO1 barcodes for 37 species of Canadian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from the provinces Ontario and New Brunswick. Sequence varia- tion was analysed in a 617-bp fragment from the 5 ′ end of the CO1 region. Sequences of each mosquito species formed barcode clusters with tight cohesion that were usually clearly distinct from those of allied species. CO1 sequence divergences were, on aver- age, nearly 20 times higher for congeneric species than for members of a species; diver- gences between congeneric species averaged 10.4% (range 0.2 – 17.2%), whereas those for conspecific individuals averaged 0.5% (range 0.0 – 3.9%). Key words . Barcode of life, CO1 – 5 ′ region, evolution , mitochondrial DNA, molecular taxonomy, mosquitoes , sequence divergence. Introduction (WNv) in North America, mosquito identification and assess- ment of vector status has gained renewed significance on this The increasing loss of biodiversity globally has led to numerous continent. Successful longterm control of WNv will be aided by proposals to intensify efforts to produce a census of all biologi- information on the epidemiological role of mosquitoes and the cal diversity and to modernize taxonomy ( Bisby et al.
    [Show full text]
  • West Nile Virus Nonhuman Surveillance in Washington State
    2003 Surveillance Program Report West Nile Virus Nonhuman Surveillance in Washington State September 2004 Environmental Health Division Office of Environmental Health and Safety 2003 Surveillance Program Report West Nile Virus Nonhuman Surveillance in Washington State September 2004 For more information or additional copies of this report contact: Anne Duffy Zoonotic Disease Section-West Nile Virus Surveillance Program Office of Environmental Health and Safety PO Box 47825 Olympia, Washington 98504-7825 Phone: (360) 236-3372 Fax: (360) 236-2261 Email: [email protected] The 2003 Surveillance Program Report - West Nile Virus Nonhuman Surveillance in Washington State is available in electronic format on the Internet at: www.doh.wa.gov/wnv. Mary C. Selecky Secretary of Health Page Contents 1 2003 Program Highlights 3 Introduction 4 Mosquito Surveillance 4 Surveillance Activities 4 Mosquito Species Findings 6 Potential West Nile Virus Vectors 7 Mosquito Pool Testing 8 Mosquito Control 8 Bird Surveillance 8 Surveillance Activities 9 Chicken Serosurveillance 10 Veterinary Surveillance 10 Surveillance Activities 10 Zoo Surveillance 10 Outreach Activities 10 Publications 11 Other Outreach Activities 13 Appendix 1: Mosquito Species by County, Western Washington 15 Appendix 2: Mosquito Species by County, Eastern Washington 17 Appendix 3: 2003 West Nile Virus Surveillance, Testing Summary List of Figures 4 Figure 1. West Nile Virus Surveillance 4 Figure 2. Mosquito Trapping Events 2003 6 Figure 3. Potential West Nile Virus Vectors, Western Washington 7 Figure 4. Potential West Nile Virus Vectors, Eastern Washington 8 Figure 5. Dead Birds Tested 2003 10 Figure 6. Horses Tested 2003 2003 Program Highlights • Mosquito surveillance resulted in the identification of mosquito species never before reported in 21 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaestiones Entomologicae
    THE FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF THE MOUTHPARTS OF SOME MOSQUITO LARVAE A.M.PUCAT Quaestiones„ entomologicae Division of Natural Sciences oo 1 O University of Saskatchewan, Regina Homologies of the parts of the maxilla and the labium of mosquito larvae were studied. The name cardobasistipes is proposed for the triangular sclerite latero-posterior of the maxilla, previously known as the cardo or the palpifer. The numbers of serrations on the prementum and submentum were found to be of taxonomic value. The sequence of mouthpart movements of filter feeding and browsing species, and the progress of food particles from the feeding current into the mouth were observed. Differences in stiffness were found among the setae in different posi- tions on the mouthparts. These differences were confirmed by staining the cuticle with Mallory’s triple stain and are correlated with the functions of the setae during feeding. Flexible serrations at the tips of the labral brush hairs are used for raking food particles in most of the browsing species of Aedes and Culiseta studied. When in pond water neither the browsing nor the filter feeding larvae select the type of food they ingest. Feeding behaviour of the predatory larvae of Chaoborus americanus (J ohannsen) and Mochlonyx velutinus (Ruthe) was observed. INTRODUCTION The mouthparts of a mosquito larva occupy a large portion of its head; their structure is degenerate. In this work emphasis is placed on the homologies of the parts of the maxilla and the labium, on the structure and function of the labral brushes and on the type and size of food part- icles ingested by the larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapause and Quiescence: Dormancy Mechanisms That Contribute to The
    Diniz et al. Parasites & Vectors (2017) 10:310 DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2235-0 REVIEW Open Access Diapause and quiescence: dormancy mechanisms that contribute to the geographical expansion of mosquitoes and their evolutionary success Diego Felipe Araujo Diniz1, Cleide Maria Ribeiro de Albuquerque2, Luciana Oliveira Oliva2, Maria Alice Varjal de Melo-Santos1 and Constância Flávia Junqueira Ayres1* Abstract Mosquitoes are insects belonging to the order Diptera and family Culicidae. They are distributed worldwide and include approximately 3500 species, of which about 300 have medical and veterinary importance. The evolutionary success of mosquitoes, in both tropical and temperate regions, is due to the various survival strategies these insects have developed throughout their life histories. Of the many adaptive mechanisms, diapause and quiescence, two different types of dormancy, likely contribute to the establishment, maintenance and spread of natural mosquito populations. This review seeks to objectively and coherently describe the terms diapause and quiescence, which can be confused in the literature because the phenotypic effects of these mechanisms are often similar. Keywords: Culicidae, Seasonality, Metabolism, Adaptation, Dispersion, Disease transmission Background Mosquitoes, especially from the genera Anopheles, Mosquitoes are arthropods that can cause considerable Aedes and Culex, include vectors for three major groups nuisance and affect human health worldwide [1, 2]. They of human pathogens: parasites from the genus Plas- are among the most prolific and invasive species, con- modium, which cause malaria; filarial worms from the tributing to the spread of endemic diseases [3, 4]. These genera Wuchereria and Brugia; and many arboviruses, in- organisms are present in most places on the planet, from cluding the agents of dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya, the Arctic to the most remote desert oases, except Ant- zika and others [12–14].
    [Show full text]
  • An Identification Guide to the Mosquitoes of Utah
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH BIOLOGICAL SERIES Vol. XII June, 1961 No. 3 AN IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO THE MOSQUITOES OF UTAH BY LEW IS T. NIELSEN and DON M. REES Department of Zoology and Entomology * Published by UNIVERSITY OF UTAH S a lt L a k e C i t y , Utah UNIVERSITY OF UTAH BIOLOGICAL SERIES Editors: W il l ia m H. B e h l e , Chairman; S e v il l e F l o w e r s , M argare S c h e l l , R ic h a r d W . V a n N o r m a n , R o b e r t K . V ic k e r y Volume 12, No. 3, pp. 63, figures 1-57 Submitted by editors — June 8, 1961 Issued June, 1961 Price, $2.00 CONTENTS MAP ......................................................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... v TAXONOMIC TREATMENT ........................................................................................... 1 Table I— List of Utah Mosquitoes, Their Systematic Position and Relative Abundance .................................................................................... 2 Keys to the genera of Utah mosquitoes.................................................................... 4 Adult females ......................................................................................................... 4 Fourth instar larvae............................................................................................
    [Show full text]