Danish and Other Nordic Parasitic Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Danish and Other Nordic Parasitic Plants danish and OtHer Nordic ParaSitic planTs Henning S. Heide-JørgenSen KOngenS LYngBY - 2014 Contents What is a parasitic plant? .................................. 3 Basics about haustoria ...................................... 6 The Nordic genera ........................................... 7 Thesium - Toadflax .................................... 7 Viscum - Mistletoe ....................................... 7 Cuscuta - Dodder ..................................... 10 Broomrape family - Orobanchaceae........... 12 Euphrasia - Eyebright ............................... 12 Odontites - Rattle ...................................... 13 The author Melampyrum - Cow-Wheat ...................... 14 Henning S. Heide-Jørgensen was born in 1942. Bartsia - Alpine Bartsia ............................ 16 He received a Candidatum Scientiarum from the Parentucellia - Yellow Bartsia ................... 17 University of Copenhagen in 1970 and PhD in Pedicularis - Lousewort ............................. 17 1974 in ecological plant anatomy, and taught Rhinanthus - Rattle .................................... 21 there as Associate Professor until 1986 when the Lathraea - Toothwort ................................. 22 Institute of Plant Anatomy and Cytology was Orobanche - Broomrape ............................ 24 closed due to budget reductions. He was a Guest Haustoria ....................................................... 27 Researcher at the University of Victoria, Bri- Anatomy and function ................................ 27 tish Columbia in1990-1991, and returned as Re- Establisment of the parasite ........................ 30 search Assistant at the Institute of Biology, Uni- How many hosts? (Host specificity) .............. 32 versity of Copenhagen until retirement in 2007. Further ecological relations .............................. 35 He taught at the Open University for 20 years. Evolution of parasites ..................................... 37 His scientific publications have included studi- Supplementary reading .................................. 40 es af xeromorphic plants, the plant cuticle, carni- vorous plants, parasitic plants, and the biological consequences of climate change in Greenland. Acknowledments Copyright Persons mentioned in the figure legends are great- No part of this publication may be reproduced ly acknowledged for contributing illustrations, Dr. without prior written permission from the au- Job Kuijt for comments on the manuscript, Palle thor. One printout for personal use is allowed. Gravesen for information on parasitic plant loca- Links to the paper are allowed. Copyright to lities, and the publisher Brill for permission to use the illustrations belongs to photographers men- figures from H. S. Heide-Jørgensen 2008: Parasitic tioned in the Figure legends. Flowering Plants. Cover The hemiparasitic Toothwort, Lathraea squamaria, mostly parasitizes Hazel, Corylus avellana. Photo: H. S. Heide-Jørgensen. 2 1. European Mistletoe, Viscum album, a rare but well known parasite in southern Scandinavia. Photo: H. S. Heide-Jørgensen. In most people’s minds, the term ‘parasite’ sounds largest single flower Rafflesia, and the smallest as something very unpleasant and it must be ac- and most reduced ones in Balanophoraceae, there knowledged that even among flowering plants is a list of supplementary literature on page 40. some of the most harmful weeds in the world in relation to agriculture and forestry are parasitic What is a parasitic plant? plants. However, in the Nordic countries parasitic Parasitic plants have evolved the ability to obtain plants cause no harm and that is also true for the water and nutrients from their host plants.They majority of the about 4.500 species known world- do so by exploiting the organs of the hosts and wide. From another point of view, many parasitic the most advanced parasites also benefit from the plants exhibit flowers just as beautiful as those of host’s photosynthesis. Usually the exploited hosts orchids, and their nutrient uptake is as specialised will grow a little less and produce fewer and/or as in carnivorous plants. Furthermore, they are smaller fruits but in most cases the hosts does not as important elements in various ecosystems as suffer severely. If the host is drained so hard of any other organism. The present paper focuses on water and nutrients that it dies, the parasite has re- parasitic plants in the five Nordic countries: Den- moved the basis for its own existence. This, how- mark including the Faro Islands and Greenland, ever, is not the case for annual parasites as dis- Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland. Scandi- cussed on page 35. navia refers to Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. More precisely a parasitic plant can be defined The Scandinavian Peninsula to Norway and Swe- as a plant that possesses a so-called physiological den. If the reader wants to know more about bridge used for transportation of water and nu- harmful parasites, explosive flowers in some Lo- trients from the host to the parasite. This bridge ranthaceae (the mistletoe family) and their polli- is called a haustorium, a term derived from the nation and dispersal biology, or about the world’s Latin ‘to drink’. The structure and function of 3 2. Holdfasts of the climbing Japanese Ivy, Par- 3. English Ivy, Hedera helix, has climbing stems thenosissus tricuspidata, attached to brick. adhering to their support by adventitious roots Photo: H. S. Heide-Jørgensen. secreting an adhesive substance. Photo: H. S. Heide-Jørgensen. the haustorium are discussed on page 27. How- phyte) and the visible part outside the host (the ever, the term haustorium for the connection has exophyte). through time been used in very different mean- Yet another problem in relation to the parasitic ings. At first, it was used to describe the physi- plant definition is that some none-parasites are in cal connection between a Dodder (Cuscuta) and tight physical contact with other plants but with- its host. Irrespective of the organism in ques- out absorbing anything from their supporting tion there is the common feature for haustoria plant. This, for example, applies in the rain for- that they are used for the uptake and transport of ests to a great number of orchids, many bromeli- water and nutrients. ads (Bromeliaceae), and to other flowering plants Another problem is the fact that the haustori- besides a great number of lichens, mosses and um is not always visible to the naked eye. After ferns. Such plants which only use other plants for germination and penetration into the host all ex- support are called epiphytes. In climbers such as ternal signs of the presence of the parasites may the Japanese Creeper or Grape Ivy (Parthenosis- have disappeared for a longer period. The entire sus tricuspidata, Fig. 2) and English Ivy (Hedera vegetative body of the parasite may split into cel- helix, Fig. 3) special adhesive organs have de- lular strands which are completely embedded veloped which literally glue the plant to any sup- in host tissue. It may take months or years be- porting surface but lack the capability for water fore flowers or inflorescences are produced and and nutrient uptake. emerge on the surface of the host. This happens There is one more group of plants which may e.g. in Rafflesiaceae, and the most advanced spe- be mistaken for parasitic plants. These plants cies in the mistletoe family (Viscaceae) evolve were earlier known as saprophytes. They have in the same direction. In such cases a haustori- practically no chlorophyll and hence no photo- um cannot be identified and one distinguishes synthesis. This means that the members depend between the parts hidden in the host (the endo- on having all carbon nutrients supplied by other 4 4. Yellow Bird’s nest (Monotropaceae) is a myco- 5. Bird’s Nest Orchid is not a parasitic plant but heterotrophic plant free of chlorophyll. It occurs a myco-heterotrophic orchid. Photo: H. S. Heide- in beech and pine woods. Photo: H. S. Heide-Jør- Jørgensen. gensen. plants. The opinion was that carbon is delivered plants are now called myco-heterotrophic plants. by fungi which decompose dead organic matter There are about 400 species in nine families. in the soil. The fungi have hyphae connections As mentioned there are about 4,500 species of par- (mycorrhizae) to the parasite. Examples of this asitic flowering plants. They are placed in 20 families group of plants from the Nordic flora are Yellow or 28 if a recent splitting up of Santalaceae in 8 fami- Bird’s nest (Monotropa hypopitys, Fig. 4) and the lies is accepted. They occur in all parts of the world orchids Bird’s Nest Orchid (Neottia nidus-avis, except Antarctica and in practically all plant commu- Fig. 5), Northern Coral-Root (Corallorhiza trifi- nities except in water. In the Nordic countries inclu- da), and Spurred Coral-Root (Epipogium aphyl- sive the Faro Islands and Greenland there are about lum). It is possible that some plants are sapro- 50 species in four families. In addition there are some phytes in accordance with the original definition, introduced species and a number of subspecies. i.e. plants that obtain organic carbon through my- Two main types of parasitic plants are recog- corrhizal connections with fungi. However, the nized which each can be divided into two sub- species so far investigated have shown to form types. The main types are either photosynthetic mycorrhizae with different fungi that at the same or non-photosynthetic and they are called hemi- time have mycorrhizae with green photosynthetic parasites and holoparasites
Recommended publications
  • Species List
    1 of 16 Claypits 20/09/2021 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Aceria macrorhyncha 2012 2012 1 acarine Aceria nalepai 2018 2018 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2001 2018 6 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2001 2018 5 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 2001 2001 1 annelid Hirudinea Leech 2011 2011 1 bird Acanthis cabaret Lesser Redpoll 2013 2013 1 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 2001 2011 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 2011 2014 2 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 2020 2020 1 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 2013 2018 4 bird Anser Goose 2011 2011 1 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 2013 2013 1 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 2013 2014 1 bird Buteo buteo Buzzard 2013 2014 2 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 2011 2014 5 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2011 2014 6 bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull 2014 2014 1 bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw 2011 2013 2 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 2014 2014 1 bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2011 2018 8 bird Corvus corax Raven 2020 2020 1 bird Corvus corone Carrion Crow 2011 2014 5 bird Curruca communis Whitethroat 2011 2014 4 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2011 2014 6 bird Cygnus olor Mute Swan 2013 2014 4 bird Delichon urbicum House Martin 2011 2011 1 bird Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2013 2014 2 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 2011 2014 7 bird Falco peregrinus Peregrine 2013 2013 1 bird Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 2010 2020 3 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 2011 2014 7 bird Gallinula chloropus Moorhen 2013
    [Show full text]
  • The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin As a Refuge of the Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) Within the City
    Acta Biologica 23/2016 | www.wnus.edu.pl/ab | DOI: 10.18276/ab.2016.23-02 | strony 15–34 The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin as a refuge of the moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) within the city Łukasz Dawidowicz,1 Halina Kucharczyk2 Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland 1 e-mail: [email protected] 2 e-mail: [email protected] Keywords biodiversity, urban fauna, faunistics, city, species composition, rare species, conservation Abstract In 2012 and 2013, 418 species of moths at total were recorded in the Botanical Garden of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. The list comprises 116 species of Noctuidae (26.4% of the Polish fauna), 116 species of Geometridae (28.4% of the Polish fauna) and 63 species of other Macrolepidoptera representatives (27.9% of the Polish fauna). The remaining 123 species were represented by Microlepidoptera. Nearly 10% of the species were associated with wetland habitats, what constitutes a surprisingly large proportion in such an urbanised area. Comparing the obtained data with previous studies concerning Polish urban fauna of Lepidoptera, the moths assemblages in the Botanical Garden were the most similar to the one from the Natolin Forest Reserve which protects the legacy of Mazovian forests. Several recorded moths appertain to locally and rarely encountered species, as Stegania cararia, Melanthia procellata, Pasiphila chloerata, Eupithecia haworthiata, Horisme corticata, Xylomoia graminea, Polychrysia moneta. In the light of the conducted studies, the Botanical Garden in Lublin stands out as quite high biodiversity and can be regarded as a refuge for moths within the urban limits of Lublin.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANTLIFE.Ps, Page 1-21 @ Normalize
    IMPORTANT ARABLE PLANT AREAS Identifying priority sites for arable plant conservation in the United Kingdom Important Arable Plant Areas BOB GIBBONS/NATURAL IMAGE BOB GIBBONS/NATURAL This fine show of Corn Marigold and Common Poppy in Dorset appeared for just one season, through lack of effective herbicide treatment. Report written by: Andrew Byfield and Phil Wilson Contents This report is a summarised version of a full paper authored by Phil Wilson (Wilson, in prep.). Summary 1 Acknowledgements A large number of people have contributed to this report, in the form of site and survey information, and in 1. Introduction 3 commenting on the Important Arable Plant Areas concept and criteria presented here. In particular we should like to thank Liz McDonnell (English Nature-RDS),Andy Jones (Countryside Council for Wales), 2.The rise and fall of arable plants 4 David Pearman (Botanical Society of the British Isles), Mark Stevenson (Defra), Simon Smart (FWAG Wiltshire), Michael Woodhouse (FWAG), Ron Porley (English Nature), Jill Sutcliffe (English Nature), Chris 3. Conserving arable plants: 8 Sydes (Scottish Natural Heritage) and Kevin Walker (Centre for Ecology & Hydrology); and Joanna Bromley, a way forward Jenny Duckworth, Nicola Hutchinson, Beth Newman, Dominic Price and Joe Sutton in the resources and UK conservation teams at Plantlife International. 4. Criteria for the selection of 10 The BSBI and Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Biological Records Centre is thanked for making available Important Arable Plant Areas the 10-km square coincidence map of rare arable plants reproduced as Map 1. 5. Initial findings 14 This report was commissioned as part of Plantlife International’s species recovery programme Back from the Brink, with generous financial support from English Nature and the Esmée Fairbairn Charitable Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of a Root Hemiparasite to Elevated CO2 Depends on Host Type and Soil Nutrients
    Oecologia (1999) 120:156±161 Ó Springer-Verlag 1999 Diethart Matthies á Philipp Egli Response of a root hemiparasite to elevated CO2 depends on host type and soil nutrients Received: 17 August 1998 / Accepted: 3 March 1999 Abstract Although elevated CO2 may aect various Key words Competition á Lolium á Medicago á forms of ecological interactions, the eect of elevated Rhinanthus á Root hemiparasites CO2 on interactions between parasitic plants and their hosts has received little attention. We examined the eect )1 of elevated CO2 (590 lll ) at two nutrient (NPK) levels on the interactions of the facultative root hemiparasite Introduction Rhinanthus alectorolophus with two of its hosts, the grass Lolium perenne and the legume Medicago sativa. To study A rise in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere can possible eects on parasite mediation of competition directly aect the physiology of plants. Frequently ob- between hosts, the parasite was grown with each host served eects of elevated CO2 include higher rates of separately and with both hosts simultaneously. In addi- photosynthesis and increased water use eciency (Bazz- tion, all combinations of hosts were grown without the az 1990; Eamus 1991; KoÈ rner 1993). However, the in- parasite. Both the parasite and the host plants responded direct eects of elevated CO2 through changes in the to elevated CO2 with increased growth, but only at high interactions between plants and other organisms may be nutrient levels. The CO2 response of the hemiparasite was more important than direct physiological changes. In- stronger than that of the hosts, but depended on the host teractions that have been found to be in¯uenced by CO2 species available.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods
    The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods A report prepared for The Woodland Trust The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods Andrew Carr, Dr Matt Zeale & Professor Gareth Jones School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ Report prepared for The Woodland Trust October 2016 Acknowledgements Thanks to: Dave Rickwood of the Woodland Trust for his central role and continued support throughout this project; Dr Andrew Weatherall of the University of Cumbria; Simon Lee of Natural England and James Mason of the Woodland Trust for helpful advice; Dr Beth Clare of Queen Mary University of London for support with molecular work; the many Woodland Trust volunteers and assistants that provided their time to the project. We would particularly like to thank Tom ‘the tracker’ Williams and Mike ‘the trapper’ Treble for dedicating so much of their time. We thank the Woodland Trust, Natural England and the Heritage Lottery Fund for funding this research. We also appreciate assistance from the local landowners who provided access to land. i Contents Acknowledgements i Contents ii List of figures and tables iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods 2 1.3 Objectives 2 2 Methods 2 2.1 Study area 2 2.2 Bat capture, tagging and radio-tracking 3 2.3 Habitat mapping 4 2.4 Analysis of roost preferences 5 2.5 Analysis of ranges and foraging areas 7 2.6 Analysis of diet 7 3 Results 8 3.1 Capture data 8 3.2 Roost selection and preferences 9 3.3 Ranging and foraging 14 3.4 Diet 17 4 Discussion 21 4.1 Roost use 21 4.2 Ranging behaviour 24 4.3 Diet 25 5 Conclusion 26 References 27 Appendix 1 Summary table of all bat captures 30 Appendix 2 Comparison of individual B.
    [Show full text]
  • List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007)
    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) A list of the UK BAP priority terrestrial invertebrate species, divided by taxonomic group into: Insects, Arachnids, Molluscs and Other invertebrates (Crustaceans, Worms, Cnidaria, Bryozoans, Millipedes, Centipedes), is provided in the tables below. The list was created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report published in 2007. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Insects Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Acosmetia caliginosa Reddish Buff moth Y N Yes – SAP Acronicta psi Grey Dagger moth Y Y Y Y Acronicta rumicis Knot Grass moth Y Y N Y Adscita statices The Forester moth Y Y Y Y Aeshna isosceles
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Resolving Lamiales Relationships
    Schäferhoff et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:352 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/352 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences Bastian Schäferhoff1*, Andreas Fleischmann2, Eberhard Fischer3, Dirk C Albach4, Thomas Borsch5, Günther Heubl2, Kai F Müller1 Abstract Background: In the large angiosperm order Lamiales, a diverse array of highly specialized life strategies such as carnivory, parasitism, epiphytism, and desiccation tolerance occur, and some lineages possess drastically accelerated DNA substitutional rates or miniaturized genomes. However, understanding the evolution of these phenomena in the order, and clarifying borders of and relationships among lamialean families, has been hindered by largely unresolved trees in the past. Results: Our analysis of the rapidly evolving trnK/matK, trnL-F and rps16 chloroplast regions enabled us to infer more precise phylogenetic hypotheses for the Lamiales. Relationships among the nine first-branching families in the Lamiales tree are now resolved with very strong support. Subsequent to Plocospermataceae, a clade consisting of Carlemanniaceae plus Oleaceae branches, followed by Tetrachondraceae and a newly inferred clade composed of Gesneriaceae plus Calceolariaceae, which is also supported by morphological characters. Plantaginaceae (incl. Gratioleae) and Scrophulariaceae are well separated in the backbone grade; Lamiaceae and Verbenaceae appear in distant clades, while the recently described Linderniaceae are confirmed to be monophyletic and in an isolated position. Conclusions: Confidence about deep nodes of the Lamiales tree is an important step towards understanding the evolutionary diversification of a major clade of flowering plants. The degree of resolution obtained here now provides a first opportunity to discuss the evolution of morphological and biochemical traits in Lamiales.
    [Show full text]
  • Researchcommons.Waikato.Ac.Nz
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Identifying Host Species of Dactylanthus taylorii using DNA Barcoding A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Biological Sciences at The University of Waikato by Cassarndra Marie Parker _________ The University of Waikato 2015 Acknowledgements: This thesis wouldn't have been possible without the support of many people. Firstly, my supervisors Dr Chrissen Gemmill and Dr Avi Holzapfel - your professional expertise, advice, and patience were invaluable. From pitching the idea in 2012 to reading through drafts in the final fortnight, I've been humbled to work with such dedicated and accomplished scientists. Special mention also goes to Thomas Emmitt, David Mudge, Steven Miller, the Auckland Zoo horticulture team and Kevin.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Coefficient of Conservatism
    Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity Conservatism Wetness Abies balsamea balsam fir native 3 0 Abies concolor white fir non‐native 0 Abutilon theophrasti velvetleaf non‐native 0 3 Acalypha rhomboidea common threeseed mercury native 2 3 Acer ginnala Amur maple non‐native 0 Acer negundo boxelder non‐native 0 0 Acer pensylvanicum striped maple native 5 3 Acer platanoides Norway maple non‐native 0 5 Acer pseudoplatanus sycamore maple non‐native 0 Acer rubrum red maple native 2 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple native 6 ‐3 Acer saccharum sugar maple native 5 3 Acer spicatum mountain maple native 6 3 Acer x freemanii red maple x silver maple native 2 0 Achillea millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. borealis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea ptarmica sneezeweed non‐native 0 3 Acinos arvensis basil thyme non‐native 0 Aconitum napellus Venus' chariot non‐native 0 Acorus americanus sweetflag native 6 ‐5 Acorus calamus calamus native 6 ‐5 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry native 7 5 Actaea racemosa black baneberry non‐native 0 Actaea rubra red baneberry native 7 3 Actinidia arguta tara vine non‐native 0 Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian maidenhair native 9 3 Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair native 8 3 Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine native 7 Aegopodium podagraria bishop's goutweed non‐native 0 0 Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity
    [Show full text]
  • An Account of Orobanche L. in Britain and Ireland
    Watsonia, 18, 257-295 (1991) 257 An accountof OrobancheL. in Britain and Ireland J. RUMSEY and S. L. JURY Departmentof Botany, Universityof Reading,P.O. Box 221,Reading, Berkshire, RG6 2AS ABSTRACT Morphological descriptions are given of the 14 speciesof Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) recorded in the British Isles, together with separate keys for identifying fresh material and herbarium specimens. Accounts of the history of the speciesare presented together with illustrations and distribution maps. The variation in Orobanche minor is accounted for with the recognition of four varieties. INTRODUcnON ..,,; . The genus Orobanche is renowned as a taxonomically very difficult one. In most casesthis is a result of many of the useful charactersbecoming lost on drying, and the lack of adequate field notes. Plants which are very distinct in the field become reduced to a hideous brown uniformity when pressed. Therefore, herbarium specimens are often incorrectly determined (an average of 5-10% in fact). The loss of characters on drying, considerable intra-specific variation, confusing synonymies, incorrectly cited names and badly described specieswith poor types (often with different specieson the same sheet) have done little to generate interest in the genus. Too many botanists have shown a reluctance to deal with this genusin herbaria, perpetuating the myth that the speciesare impossible to identify once dried. Certainly, Orobanche minor Sm. and its close relatives often cannot be positively determined without descriptive notes made at the time of gathering, but all other species from the British Isles are distinct enough not to need any additional information. It is hoped that this account will stimulate other botanists to study, identify and record members of this fascinating parasitic genus in Britain and Ireland, as well as clear up some errors and confusions made in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Rank List.Xlsx
    FAMILY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME S RANK Aceraceae Acer ginnala Amur Maple SNA Aceraceae Acer negundo Manitoba Maple S5 Aceraceae Acer negundo var. interius Manitoba Maple S5 Aceraceae Acer negundo var. negundo Manitoba Maple SU Aceraceae Acer negundo var. violaceum Manitoba Maple SU Aceraceae Acer pensylvanicum Striped Maple SNA Aceraceae Acer rubrum Red Maple SNA Aceraceae Acer spicatum Mountain Maple S5 Acoraceae Acorus americanus Sweet Flag S5 Acoraceae Acorus calamus Sweet‐flag SNA Adoxaceae Adoxa moschatellina Moschatel S1 Alismataceae Alisma gramineum Narrow‐leaved Water‐plantain S1 Alismataceae Alisma subcordatum Common Water‐plantain SNA Alismataceae Alisma triviale Common Water‐plantain S5 Alismataceae Sagittaria cuneata Arum‐leaved Arrowhead S5 Alismataceae Sagittaria latifolia Broad‐leaved Arrowhead S4S5 Alismataceae Sagittaria rigida Sessile‐fruited Arrowhead S2 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus albus Tumble Pigweed SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate Pigweed SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus hybridus Smooth Pigweed SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot Pigweed SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus spinosus Thorny Amaranth SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus tuberculatus Rough‐fruited water‐hemp SU Anacardiaceae Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac S4 Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron rydbergii Poison‐ivy S5 Apiaceae Aegopodium podagraria Goutweed SNA Apiaceae Anethum graveolens Dill SNA Apiaceae Carum carvi Caraway SNA Apiaceae Cicuta bulbifera Bulb‐bearing Water‐hemlock S5 Apiaceae Cicuta maculata Water‐hemlock S5 Apiaceae Cicuta virosa Mackenzie's
    [Show full text]
  • Harridge Woods Woods N 5 East South Woods Harridge 2 2 Woods 4 West to Oakhill Key Keepers Key 3 3 CoAge Long Route Red (2Km+) 6
    To Radstock To Radstock Edford Harridge 1 1 Harridge Woods Woods N 5 East South Woods Harridge 2 2 Woods 4 West To Oakhill Key Keepers Key 3 3 Coage Long Route Red (2km+) 6 10 Short Route Green (Under 2km) Limekiln What to see at Harridge Woods 7 Wood Roadside Verge Parking Home Trees and fungi Public Footpath 9 8 Wood Pedunculate Oak Quercus robur 0 300m All year Deer Fencing Permissive Path Hazel Corylus avellana All year Information Board Norway Spruce Picea abies Grass Edford 1 1 Harridge All year Woodland Stoggle - various species Woods Rock Faces Woods All year 5 Stream South East Silver Birch Betula pendula Glade All year Steep Drop Ash Fraxinus excelsior Keepers Cottage 2 2 All year Harridge Wych Elm Ulmus glabra Photos other side: Bridge ©Neil Watson, Song thrush ©Steve Waterhouse, Roe Deer and Bluebell ©Elliott Neep, Nuthatch ©Matthew Peaster, Silver washed fritillary ©Phil Bishop, Keepers Cottage ©Adel Avery, Dormouse ©Jamie Edmonds, Kingfisher ©Brian Phipps, Fly agaric Neep ©Elliott Dormouse Kingfisher Fly ©Jamie Edmonds, washed fritillary ©Brian Silver Avery, Phipps, Keepers ©Adel Cottage Bishop, ©Phil ©Matthew Nuthatch Peaster, Roe Deer Neep, and Bluebell ©Elliott Waterhouse, Song thrush ©Steve Watson, other side: Bridge ©Neil Photos Dormouse Kingfisher ©Richard Burkmarr Comma ©Jamie Edmonds, ©Brian Phipps, Waterhouse, Song thrush ©Steve Bishop, Otter Brimstone ©Phil ©Brian Phipps, Neep, Dipper ©Elliott Holland, mouse ©Margaret Wood Avery, horseshoe bat ©Adel horseshoe bat and Lesser Greater Trust, bat ©Bat Conservation
    [Show full text]