DOCSLIB.ORG

Report N-File 731 32 B SI1 Dsu Qafy 43

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report N-File 731 32 B SI1 Dsu Qafy 43 45' R 16 W 30' c R 15 W R 14 W R 13 W 15' R 12 W R 11 W c R 10 W 113°00' 41°00' Qlf Sl Qafy b c Sl Oes Qlf Qes c 35 36 41°00' Plate1 Qlf Qafy DSu Sl 40 UTAHGEOLOGICAL SURVEY 40 Qlg Qlgf Qei *osi? 40 Sl c Qei/Qlg U tah GeologicalUtah Surve Ope y Report n-File 731 32 b SI1 DSu Qafy 43 Qlg 73 Qlg 43 a division of Qlg32 b Qlg DSu InterimGeologic MapBonneville the of FlatsSalt b b š Qafy Qlgf c Dsi 20 Qafy Utah DepartmeUtah NaturalofResources nt b Qes 44 b and East Part of the Wethe Quadrangleof PartEast and ndover 60' x s—Year30' 3 b Qafy Qlg Dg 35 Qes DSu Qh Qlg c P*os 18 / c b Qlg 25 Qla P*osc b b Qes c Qafy Qes/Qla 55 63 Qpl Qes 50 b Qafy 46 c b Qlgf c 45 Qlf T 3 N 57 80 c Qlf 10 70 b Qla Qes b c Oe Qlg Qes Qpl b 35 49 25 Qlg 30 Qlg c *osi 20 Qai c 45c 35 b b 20 35 b Qlgf b Qlg T 3 N Sl 7 45b c 52 b Oes Sl 18 b 24 60 Qlf 78 c Qlgf 10 25 33 b Qh 15 b b 30 b 15 Dsi b 70 *osi? c b b b Qlgf 30 b 45 c 40 Dsi 22 52 Qlgf 20 Qeas/Qpl b INTERIMGEOLOGIC MAP OFTHE BONNEVILLE SALT FLATS b Qla Qla 29 Qlg b Dg b 30 14 23 b b Qai Qls b 13 b 40 Qlg b 34 b 30 52 25 Qlg b Sl 40 33 Qlg Qlg b 31 b b b Qla 25 Qal b bDsi 30 Sl c b c b 25 c 24 b Qlg 40 Dg b20 27 b 30 b b Qafy 30 56 / P*os? *Mdc Qlg Qlgf b 59 53 b b 14 b 20 c ANDEAST PART OFTHE WENDOVER QUADRANGLES, 60' X 30' Qlg b 35 20 35 b Psd Qai 20 30 b 33 77 20 25 Qmtc 18 c 11 c b b 55b Dsi Qlgb b b b b b 14 65 P*os Tsl *osi? 20 20 47 35 b 43 b Qlg 40 37 b b 22 15 b c c 27 g c b b b 22 b c30 30 24 32 b b Qafy TOOELECOUNTY, UTAH—YEAR 3 35 b Dsi c P*osc b 33 c Tra(Dg)b b Qpl 40 49 c b 40 b c 15 17 Qei/Qlf c 30 35 PU DDLE Qafy 70 c 43 gb 10 c b 34 30 45 b b 45 b 55 Qlg 47 V ALLEY b 45 50 42 42 15 c b b3 Qlg 35 c c 36 b bb b c 26 b FAU LT Dsi 35 12 17 Qlg Qlg Qafy Qla 70 43 45 ? Qlg Qh c Z ON E b Qlg g c Mj 10 b 32 Sl 75 Qpl c c 21 24 b70 FJ10 c b 2020 Dg b 78 b Dsi 76 70 Sl 40 b Sl Qlg b Tsl? 5 5 Dsi Tid ‹ 65 75 71 P*os 20 b b b 35 b 35 34 b Qla 22 b Sl 20 Qh 80 55 b *osi b AN TICLINE Tra(Dg) 75 Qlg 73 b b 35 b Qms 43 b Dsi b 73 40 35 25 Qlg Qpl b b b b b Psd Qai 70 b 43 63 b 65 b 22 37 b b Qla 5 b b b 25 20 c by 32 Ppg 81 40 55 g b b 50 b b b5 Qla b 25 30 b PEAK Qlg Qlg 22 b 45 b Qafy b Qms Dsi LT FAU 17 c Qlg Sl 35 Qafy b b Qafy Qlg Qafy b Qla 33 Qafy Psd 42 28 75 78 b b 1 2 1 3 30 Qafy Qpl 20 b COBB 50 c b 52 g 66 70 DonaClark L. ld Charle , OviattG. s Hardwick L. Christian , DavidPageand , b ‘ g b 50 10 Qlgf BW8 b 60 b b b 28 Dsi Qla Psd b Qla b b Sl b 45 20 Qlg Qafy Qlg Qai g Qlg Sl 20 Qai 38 1 Dsi b 62 59 49 Qlg b Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, Utah Qes b Qafy Qlab *ol THRU ST CALCITE b FJ2 Sl Qlf FJ5 Qla 2 13 *osi 10 5 Sl Qh 27 ‹ ‹ 40 Emeritus, Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas b / b Qlgf b b b bQafy b b FJ4 b 38 b 3 Pge Qlg P*os Qla Qh 45 Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada Qes THRU ST ‹ b 30 33 20 b 9 b 45 Polf 43 41 g 30 BW34 Ppm Qafy FJ9 b Sl b b 30 Psd Qla b b 40 Qafy ‹ b ‹b 40 Qafy Ppg b Oes 32 b Qh Qafy 45 b b *e b b b FJ7 FJ6 b … 81 37b P*ps 20 65 30 b b Qla b b 30 b 18 11 77 b b 45 b 30 Oes 15 … 30 60b ‹ ‹ FJ3 g 38 Qafyb Qafy Qlg 33 60 b b 23 50 FJ8 14 Qeas/Qpl Polf b 23 b ‹ Qpl b 54 FJ1 *ol Qafy *e Pm b Qh/ 20 80 ‹ b 40 40 P*ps Qlg b 75 *ol 65 Qlg Qlg / Qla 67 Qlf Qpl 34 Tid b Qafy b 42 b SCALE1:62,500 23 Qafy Qlgf 81 b 54 25 bP*ps BW21 b b b b 27 b 20 25 b 36 Qla 62 30 Qh ‹42 b *osib 1 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES 23 b b RIDGE b b 23 b Qafy 20 b b 40 15 b *e? 55 16 40 b 32 Qlf Qafy Qlg b 30 Polf 6 Psd 68 25 b Qafy b b b b P*os? Qlg Qla Qafy / Qafy / b BW7 40 1 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KILOMETERS 45b Qes Qh 52 60 Qh b b b Qafy NUTTR2 ‘ g 75 56 P*os b Qeas/Qpl Qlg Qlg Qes Qes š b P*os 20 b65 *osi 25 15 30 b 50 b b b Qlg 45 b b P*ps b CON TOU RINTERVAL AN5 METERS D20 Qafy b 23 75 60 T 2 N Qlg b 57 25 35 35 b 10 21 Qafy b Qafy b b b b 25 b 56 38 P*ps Qes b 37 *osi Qeas/Qpl FINGER Tid 55 b T 2 N Qlf P*os 40 b Qpl Qes Qafy b25 b 55 48 b b Qlg b Qla Qla 40 T P*os Qpl L 28 P*os Psd b U b b b P*os 22 GRASSY Qh 53 28 A F 37 b b b 35 Qafy 18 Ppg T S b 35 b U b Qlg Qes 17 Qes 45 R Qla Qes H Qei/Qlf Qafy T R 17 W Qes Qla 22 b Qlgf Qlf Qlg _np _np _np _ou Qes 11.80° Qlf b _np ! ! ! ! Qal E Qlf 44 T *Mdc Qal Qla I Qafy Qla Qafy Qes PASS Qlg C Qes 46 *Mdc 35 L b Qla P*osb Qafy 14b b A *e Dg Qes 29 _np Qes/Qlf C NUTTR1 c Qla P*os Qal w Qes š TRU E NORTH E TRU Qla BC6 Qes 55 36 Qlg c MAGN ETIC NORTH MAGN ETIC Qes 82 b Qlf U T A HAU T Qes 12 Qeas/Qpl g APPROXIMATEMEAN Qla Qpl 26 b DECLINATION2020 , Ppg b b Qafy Qai 7 Qlf b b b Pm Qla Qes 34 b 12 MAPLOCATION b 55 b bb 28 Psd 12 b43 40 Qafy Qes b b 30 Qes 28 38 41 Qes 39 Qls b Qafy b 60 39 bb15 b 56 b 42 30 18 b FAU LT b 57 b 20 Qpl b 30 Pge Qlf 22 Qes b / Qafy b / b Psd 20 ? Qes 57 b Qlg 15 / b b 30 Qlf b b Qes ^t b32 Qei/Qlg b Qes Qh 64 b 25 58 / 15/ b Qes / FB1 ‹ 32 g Qes b 34 b Qes b ‹ c FB2b b 32 Qes b b 40 Qafy 16 Qlg b ^t Qlf c Qlgf Qpl 51 35 Qla b Qh/ c b 60 c Qpl 70 g g 40 Qai Disclaimer Qps 50 86 17 37 ? c 80 50 Qes b Psd Qes c b Thisopen -filerelea sema kesinforma tionava ilabthe le pubto licduring the review an dproduction period necessary aformafor UGS l Ppm Psd c c 30 pub lication.The ma ma p ybe incomplete, an dinconsisten an derrors, cies,omissions ha vebeennot resolved. The ma ma p conform ynot 50 Qlg b 80 to UGS to policy an deditorial stan daan rds ma dit ybe prem aanfor tureindividua takegroup to or actions l ba sedcontenAlthoughon its ts. Qes Qes/Qlf Qafy 78 Ppg Qei/Qlg g 75 this productthisrepresen thework ts ofprofessiona thescien lUtah Departmen tists, ofNa t turalResources, Utah Geological Survey, ma kes 45 b nwa o expressed rran ty, implied, or rega rdingsuitab its ilityafor particular use. The Utah Departmen ofNa t turalResources, Utah Qes b b 60 CH2 75 GeologicalSurvey, sha llbenot liab leun deran ycircum stan cesanfor yindirect,direct, special, inciden consequen or tal, tialda m a ges Qes Qpl Qafy b Qes P*os with respect to claimswith respectto by usersGeologyproduct.thisof inten dedscale.use for1:62,500 at š b Qes Qes 11 43 30 bb Qlf 45 75 22 b b Thisgeologic ma wa p fun s dedby theUtah Geological Survey an dtheGeologicalU.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wasatch Fault
    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
    [Show full text]
  • CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY and ... -.: Palaeontologia Polonica
    CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF THE PERTH LIMESTONE MEMBER, STAUNTON FORMATION (PENNSYLVANIAN) OF THE ILLINOIS BASIN, U.S.A. CARl B. REXROAD. lEWIS M. BROWN. JOE DEVERA. and REBECCA J. SUMAN Rexroad , c.. Brown . L.. Devera, 1.. and Suman, R. 1998. Conodont biostrati graph y and paleoec ology of the Perth Limestone Member. Staunt on Form ation (Pennsy lvanian) of the Illinois Basin. U.S.A. Ill: H. Szaniawski (ed .), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conodont Symposium (ECOS VI). - Palaeont ologia Polonica, 58 . 247-259. Th e Perth Limestone Member of the Staunton Formation in the southeastern part of the Illinois Basin co nsists ofargill aceous limestone s that are in a facies relati on ship with shales and sandstones that commonly are ca lcareous and fossiliferous. Th e Perth conodo nts are do minated by Idiognathodus incurvus. Hindeodus minutus and Neognathodu s bothrops eac h comprises slightly less than 10% of the fauna. Th e other spec ies are minor consti­ tuents. The Perth is ass igned to the Neog nathodus bothrops- N. bassleri Sub zon e of the N. bothrops Zo ne. but we were unable to co nfirm its assignment to earliest Desmoin esian as oppose d to latest Atokan. Co nodo nt biofacies associations of the Perth refle ct a shallow near- shore marine environment of generally low to moderate energy. but locali zed areas are more variable. particul ar ly in regard to salinity. K e y w o r d s : Co nodo nta. biozonation. paleoecology. Desmoinesian , Penn sylvanian. Illinois Basin. U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 03-Alekseev and Goreva (Neognathodus).P65
    Lucas, S.G., et al. eds., 2013, The Carboniferous-Permian Transition. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin 60. 1 THE CONODONT NEOGNATHODUS BOTHROPS MERRILL, 1972 AS THE MARKER FOR THE LOWER BOUNDARY OF THE MOSCOVIAN STAGE (MIDDLE PENNSYLVANIAN) ALEXANDER S. ALEKSEEV1 AND NATALIA V. GOREVA 2 1 Department of Paleontology, Geological Faculty, Moscow State University, Russia, email: aaleks@geol. msu.ru; 2 Geological institute of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, email: [email protected] Abstract—The Moscovian Stage constitutes the Middle Pennsylvanian Series of the Carboniferous System, but a biostratigraphic marker and GSSP for it have not yet been designated. The exact position of the Moscovian boundary cannot be defined properly because in the type area the basal Vereian unconformably overlies the Mississippian limestone or the alluvial and lagoonal Aza Formation of the uppermost Bashkirian. The Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary suggested several potential markers among foraminifers and conodonts, but the search for a marker near traditional base of the global Moscovian Stage has stalled. It may be more productive to search for FADs in the lower Moscovian, above the traditional base, to designate the lower boundary of the stage. Relatively rich Vereian and Kashirian conodont assemblages have been recovered from the southwest Moscow Basin, as well as from the Oka-Tsna Swell. The most complete information on the distribution of conodonts in the Vereian- Kashirian boundary interval was obtained from the Yambirno section (Oka-Tsna Swell). The greatest change in conodont assemblages does not occur near the level of the traditional base of the Moscovian, but stratigraphically higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Title the Lower Triassic Kurotaki Fauna in Shikoku and Its Allied
    The Lower Triassic Kurotaki Fauna in Shikoku and its allied Title Faunas in Japan Author(s) Nakazawa, Keiji Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University. Series of Citation geology and mineralogy (1971), 38(1): 103-133 Issue Date 1971-08-15 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/186575 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University MEMOrRs oF THE FAcuLTy oF SalENcE, KyoTo UNTvERsrry, SERIEs oF GEoL, & MrNERAL. Vol. XXXVIII, No. I, pp. 103-133, pls. 23-25, August 15, 1971 The Lower,Triassic Kurotaki Fauna in Shikoku and its allied Faunas in Japan By Kelji NAKAzAwA (Received April 8, 1971) Abstract This article treats with the description mainly of the Lower Triassic fosslls from the Kurotaki limestone in 'Shikoku, southwestJapan, which have long been left undescribed.' Ofthe Kurotaki fauna, ten species of bivalves, two species of gastropods, and one sepcies each of amrnonite and brachiopod are discriminated. The Kurotaki limestone is considered, frorn these fossils, to be Mid-Skythian, probably early Owenitan in age. The presence of "Streblochendrki" matsushitai n. sp. and Pticatifera? sp. indicates a survival of the Paleozoic elements in the eraly Triassic. Re- examining other lower Triassic faunas, taxonomic emendation has also been made. Lastly the middle Skythian transgression in Japan has been suggested by reviewing the lower Triassic Systeni in Japan. Introduction and Acknowledgements It was as early as in 1883, when the German geologist E. NAuMANN, one of the pioneers in the study of the geology ofJapan, made a geological reconnaissance in Shikoku and noticed the occurrence of the Triassic fossils at Izumigatani about 6 km north of Ryoseki, Tosa Province (Kochi Prefecture) (NAuMANN and NEuMAyR, 1890, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    CHAPTER 2 PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE GRAND CANYON PAIGE KERCHER INTRODUCTION The Paleozoic Era of the Phanerozoic Eon is defined as the time between 542 and 251 million years before the present (ICS 2010). The Paleozoic Era began with the evolution of most major animal phyla present today, sparked by the novel adaptation of skeletal hard parts. Organisms continued to diversify throughout the Paleozoic into increasingly adaptive and complex life forms, including the first vertebrates, terrestrial plants and animals, forests and seed plants, reptiles, and flying insects. Vast coal swamps covered much of mid- to low-latitude continental environments in the late Paleozoic as the supercontinent Pangaea began to amalgamate. The hardiest taxa survived the multiple global glaciations and mass extinctions that have come to define major time boundaries of this era. Paleozoic North America existed primarily at mid to low latitudes and experienced multiple major orogenies and continental collisions. For much of the Paleozoic, North America’s southwestern margin ran through Nevada and Arizona – California did not yet exist (Appendix B). The flat-lying Paleozoic rocks of the Grand Canyon, though incomplete, form a record of a continental margin repeatedly inundated and vacated by shallow seas (Appendix A). IMPORTANT STRATIGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS • Principle of Original Horizontality – In most cases, depositional processes produce flat-lying sedimentary layers. Notable exceptions include blanketing ash sheets, and cross-stratification developed on sloped surfaces. • Principle of Superposition – In an undisturbed sequence, older strata lie below younger strata; a package of sedimentary layers youngs upward. • Principle of Lateral Continuity – A layer of sediment extends laterally in all directions until it naturally pinches out or abuts the walls of its confining basin.
    [Show full text]
  • PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION of the NORTHERN WEBER SEGMENT of the WASATCH FAULT ZONE at the RICE CREEK TRENCH SITE, NORTH OGDEN, UTAH by Christopher B
    Paleoseismology of Utah, Volume 18 PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF THE NORTHERN WEBER SEGMENT OF THE WASATCH FAULT ZONE AT THE RICE CREEK TRENCH SITE, NORTH OGDEN, UTAH by Christopher B. DuRoss, Stephen F. Personius, Anthony J. Crone, Greg N. McDonald, and David J. Lidke SPECIAL STUDY 130 Utah Geological Survey UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2009 Paleoseismology of Utah, Volume 18 PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF THE NORTHERN WEBER SEGMENT OF THE WASATCH FAULT ZONE AT THE RICE CREEK TRENCH SITE, NORTH OGDEN, UTAH by Christopher B. DuRoss1, Stephen F. Personius2, Anthony J. Crone2, Greg N. McDonald1, and David J. Lidke2 1Utah Geological Survey 2U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Rice Creek trench site; view is to the east. ISBN 1-55791-819-8 SPECIAL STUDY 130 Utah Geological Survey UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2009 STATE OF UTAH Gary R. Herbert, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Michael Styler, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard G. Allis, Director PUBLICATIONS contact Natural Resources Map & Bookstore 1594 W. North Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3320 toll-free: 1-888-UTAH MAP Web site: mapstore.utah.gov email: [email protected] UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY contact 1594 W. North Temple, Suite 3110 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3300 Web site: geology.utah.gov Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of ALASKA DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Tony
    STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Tony Knowles, Governor John T. Shively, Commissioner Milton A. Wiltse, Director and State Geologist This DGGS Report of Investigations is a final report of scientific research. It has received technical review and may be cited as an agency publication. Report of Investigations 2000-5 FOSSIL LOCALITY MAP OF THE HEALY A-6 QUADRANGLE, SOUTH-CENTRAL ALASKA by R.B. Blodgett and K.H. Clautice - STATE OF ALASKA Tony Knowles, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES John T. Shively, Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Milton A. Wiltse, Director and State Geologist Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys publications can be inspected at the following locations. Address mail orders to the Fairbanks office. Alaska Division of Geological University of Alaska Anchorage Library & Geophysical Surveys 32 11 Providence Drive 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3645 Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Alaska Resource Library University of Alaska Fairbanks 3 150 C Street, Suite 100 Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-1005 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Alaska State Library State Office Building, 8th Floor 333 Willoughby Avenue Juneau, Alaska 9981 1-0571 This publication released by the Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys was produced and printed in Fairbanks, Alaska at a cost of $17 per copy. Publication is required by Alaska Statute 41, "to determine the potential of Alaskan land for production of metals, minerals, fuels, and geothermal resources; the location and supplies of groundwater and construction materials; the potential geologic hazards to buildings, roads, bridges, and other installations and structures; and shall conduct such other surveys and investigations as will advance knowledge of the geology of Alaska." CONTENTS Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Tectonics of Utah with Emphasis on Earthquake-Hazard Characterization
    QUATERNARY TECTONICS OF UTAH WITH EMPHASIS ON EARTHQUAKE-HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION by Suzanne Hecker Utah Geologiral Survey BULLETIN 127 1993 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 0 STATE OF UTAH Michael 0. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGSBoard Member Representing Lynnelle G. Eckels ................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................. Civil Engineering Jo Brandt .................................................................................................................. Public-at-Large C. Williatn Berge ...................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Russell C. Babcock, Jr.............................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ............................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ............................................................................................... Economics-Business/Scientific Scott Hirschi, Director, Division of State Lands and Forestry .................................... Ex officio member UGS Editorial Staff J. Stringfellow .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of Type Specimens of Invertebrate Fossils: Cono- Donta
    % {I V 0> % rF h y Catalog of Type Specimens Compiled Frederick J. Collier of Invertebrate Fossils: Conodonta SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY NUMBER 9 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti­ tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com­ mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of profes­ sional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. These publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, laboratories, and other in­ terested institutions and specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern England Serpukhovian (Early Namurian)
    1 Northern England Serpukhovian (early Namurian) 2 farfield responses to southern hemisphere glaciation 3 M.H. STEPHENSON1, L. ANGIOLINI2, P. CÓZAR3, F. JADOUL2, M.J. LENG4, D. 4 MILLWARD5, S. CHENERY1 5 1British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom 6 2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra "A. Desio", Università degli Studi di Milano, Via 7 Mangiagalli 34, Milano, 20133, Italy 8 3Instituto de Geología Económica CSIC-UCM; Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas; 9 Departamento de Paleontología; C./ José Antonio Novais 228040-Madrid; Spain 10 4NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, 11 Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom 12 5British Geological Survey, Murchison House, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 13 14 15 Word count 7967 16 7 figs 17 1 table 18 67 references 19 RUNNING HEADER: NAMURIAN FARFIELD GLACIATION REPONSE 1 20 Abstract: During the Serpukhovian (early Namurian) icehouse conditions were initiated 21 in the southern hemisphere; however nearfield evidence is inconsistent: glaciation 22 appears to have started in limited areas of eastern Australia in the earliest Serpukhovian, 23 followed by a long interglacial, whereas data from South America and Tibet suggest 24 glaciation throughout the Serpukhovian. New farfield data from the Woodland, 25 Throckley and Rowlands Gill boreholes in northern England allow this inconsistency to 26 be addressed. δ18O from well-preserved late Serpukhovian (late Pendleian to early 27 Arnsbergian) Woodland brachiopods vary between –3.4 and –6.3‰, and δ13C varies 28 between –2.0 and +3.2‰, suggesting a δ18O seawater (w) value of around –1.8‰ 29 VSMOW, and therefore an absence of widespread ice-caps. The organic carbon δ13C 30 upward increasing trend in the Throckley Borehole (Serpukhovian to Bashkirian; c.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2019-07-01 Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary Strata in Western Utah: Deciphering Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on Sedimentation in the Antler-Sonoma Distal Foreland Basin Joshua Kerst Meibos Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Meibos, Joshua Kerst, "Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary Strata in Western Utah: Deciphering Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on Sedimentation in the Antler-Sonoma Distal Foreland Basin" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 7583. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7583 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary Strata in Western Utah: Deciphering Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on Sedimentation in the Antler-Sonoma Distal Foreland Basin Joshua Kerst Meibos A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Scott M. Ritter, Chair Brooks B. Britt Sam Hudson Department of Geological Sciences Brigham Young University Copyright © 2019 Joshua Kerst Meibos All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary Strata in Western Utah: Deciphering Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on Sedimentation in the Antler-Sonoma Distal Foreland Basin Joshua Kerst Meibos Department of Geological Sciences, BYU Master of Science The stratal architecture of the upper Ely Limestone and Mormon Gap Formation (Pennsylvanian-early Permian) in western Utah reflects the interaction of icehouse sea-level change and tectonic activity in the distal Antler-Sonoma foreland basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 83
    Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 83 (1993) Volume 102 p. 83-91 CONODONTS FROM COAL BALLS IN THE SPRINGFIELD COAL MEMBER OF THE PETERSBURG FORMATION (DESMOINESIAN, PENNSYLVANIAN) IN SOUTHERN INDIANA Carl B. Rexroad Indiana Geological Survey 611 North Walnut Grove Bloomington, Indiana 47405 ABSTRACT: A well-preserved and moderately diverse conodont faunule was recovered from five coal balls in the Springfield Coal Member of the Petersburg Formation from Peabody Coal Com- pany's Eby Pit, Lynnville Mine, in Warrick County, Indiana. The presence of Neognathodus roundyi and the other species recorded in this study is compatible with the middle Desmoinesian age of the Springfield. Idioprioniodus conjunctus is the most ecologically diagnostic of the conodonts and suggests organic-rich, quiet water with a low pH, which in turn suggests that the conodonts lived in a salt-water marsh bordered on one side by coal swamps and on another by near-normal marine waters. Apparently coal balls had multiple origins, and the origin of the conodont-bearing ones is uncertain. INTRODUCTION Because marine fossils are commonly associated with plant fossils in some coal balls, it is not surprising that conodonts have been reported from them. A half-dozen well-pre- served conodonts from Pennsylvanian coal balls from three different States were figured by Mamay and Yochelson (1962), but no other conodonts were figured; therefore, the overall conodont content in coal balls is unknown. To better understand the distribution of conodonts and their paleoecologic impor- tance in coal balls, samples were processed from coal balls of the middle Desmoinesian Springfield Coal Member of the Petersburg Formation from the Eby Pit of Peabody Coal Company's Lynnville Mine (SW'/4 , SWA, NE'A, Sec.
    [Show full text]