PRIMER on INVASIVE SPECIES in COASTAL and MARINE WATERS 1 Box 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PRIMER on INVASIVE SPECIES in COASTAL and MARINE WATERS 1 Box 1 Charles Jacoby Linda Walters Shirley Baker Karen Blyler Florida Sea Grant College Program • http://www.flseagrant.org • SGEB 60 1 Acknowledgments Funding and support We thank Mike Spranger for his encouragement This publication was supported by the National throughout the development of this primer. Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Steve Kearl and Dorothy Zimmerman provided Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic valuable editorial input. and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) under NOAA Grant No. NA16RG-2195. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not The authors necessarily reflect the views of these organizations. Charles Jacoby is an Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist in the Department of The Florida Sea Grant College Program, the Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences at the University Southeast Regional Aquatic Nuisance Species of Florida in Gainesville, Florida. (ANS) Education and Outreach Network, a partnership between the Sea Grant College Shirley Baker is an Assistant Professor in the Programs in Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences at Mississippi, UF/IFAS Extension and the the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida. University of Central Florida provided support for the development of this document. Linda Walters is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Additional funds to support publication of this Central Florida in Orlando, Florida. document were provided by the Tampa Bay Estuary Program. Karen Blyler is the Coordinator of Education and Training in Aquatic and Environmental Science for the Florida 4-H Youth Development Program at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida. Photo credits Cover, upper left: Phyllorhiza punctata, an Indo-Pacific jellyfish now found in large numbers around the Gulf of Mexico. (Photo courtesy Dauphin Island Sea Lab) Cover, center left: Perna viridis, an Indo-Pacific mussel that became established in Tampa Bay and has spread around Florida and into Georgia. (Photo courtesy U.S. Geological Survey) Cover, lower left: Pterois volitans, an Indo-Pacific fish often kept in saltwater aquaria that is now found along the east coast of the United States. (Photo courtesy J.E. Randall) Cover, bottom half: Aerial photograph of an explosion of the Australian spotted jellyfish (Phyllorhiza punctata) in the Gulf of Mexico. (Photo courtesy Dauphin Island Sea Lab) Page 1, upper right: Pterois volitans, an Indo-Pacific fish often kept in saltwater aquaria, is now found along the east coast of the United States. (Photo courtesy J.E. Randall) 2 What are invasive species? nvasive species have looking at the history of species I entered an area that is introductions, the harm caused by not part of their natural invasive species, how invasive range. They represent one type of species are introduced and become alien, non-native, nonindigenous invasive, and how we can manage or introduced species. In contrast, our own actions and activities to native or indigenous species occur help solve the problem. in an area naturally. Invasive species that are native or intro- How long have invasive duced differ from beneficial native species been around? and non-invasive species because they can or do cause harm to the People began introducing species as economy, the environment or soon as they could travel. For human health. Typically, invasions example, beginning around 1500, involve the spread of an introduced Europeans transported Old World species. Natural vectors, such as species to their new settlements in storms, or vectors associated with the Western Hemisphere and human activities may cause elsewhere. The manifests from Columbus’ second and subsequent People apply a confusing introductions and subsequent and muddled collection of invasions by moving species along voyages indicate deliberate trans- words to invasive species. pathways. Human introductions port of species regarded as poten- may be intentional or uninten- tial crops and livestock. A glossary found on pages tional, and both types of introduc- Humans continue to disperse 14 and 15 provides species, and the worldwide increase tions can cause bioinvasions. We definitions for key terms in plant, animal, and microbial can add a political bent to the used in this publication. discussion by applying the term introductions roughly tracks exotic to species that have entered the increase in human a new country and using the term transport and commerce. In transplanted for species moved to particular, the meteoric new areas within the same country. growth of global commerce Whatever definitions we choose, in the past 200 to 500 years we should all be concerned about has produced numerous invasive species and the harm they opportunities for biotic cause. First, we want to avoid invasions. During this time harmful consequences from span, the scope, frequency introductions. Second, our actions and impact of people’s or activities can spread invasive deliberate and accidental species, so we are responsible for movements of organisms managing both introductions and undoubtedly dwarf the any consequences. Managing effects of natural forces invasive species will not simply be during any 500-year period a matter of banning all introduc- in the earth’s history. For tions because all of us benefit from example, introductions to Figure 1. Rate of new invasions by marine invertebrates and seaweeds in the U.S. coastal some introductions and many coastal habitats in the United States have increased zone from 1790 to 1999 (374 total invasions). introductions are accidental or Source: Ruiz et al., 2000; Carlton, 2001. unintentional. We can improve our over 100-fold in the last management of invasive species by 200 years (Figure 1). A PRIMER ON INVASIVE SPECIES IN COASTAL AND MARINE WATERS 1 Box 1. Throughout history, we have What harm do invasive Deliberate and accidental introductions of accidentally and deliberately intro- species cause? invasive species. duced numerous species. Our Introduced species typically do O deliberate introduction of few, if any, invasive tendency to accidentally or deliber- microorganisms, although we introduced ately introduce invasive species not survive and reproduce; there- yeasts for fermentation and mutualists, such varies among types of organisms fore, they seldom establish themselves as the symbiotic, mycorrhizal fungi found in (Box 1). The number of deliberately and become invasive (Figure 2). plant roots introduced species that become Introductions can be viewed as an O deliberate introduction of some insects that invasive emphasizes the fact that not ecological parallel to Russian have caused adverse consequences, such as all pests arrive unheralded and roulette. We ‘load bullets into a bumblebees in New Zealand, but the majority gun and spin its cylinder’ by of invasive insects have probably been inconspicuously. Many of our worst introduced accidentally problems are the product of our moving species beyond their own deliberate but flawed plans. natural ranges. Then, we ‘pull the O deliberate introduction of a few marine trigger’ by introducing species into invertebrates, such as the Pacific oyster imported from Japan to Washington state, but a growing number of invaders, such as the zebra mussel, have arrived accidentally as contaminants in ballast water and through other vectors O deliberately introduced most invasive vertebrates, principally fish, mammals and birds, although some of the worst vertebrate invaders have been spread accidentally, such as rats, brown tree snakes and sea lampreys O deliberately introduced many, if not most, plant invaders, including water hyacinth, melaleuca trees, salt cedar and other serious pests, although some invasive plants have been accidentally introduced as contami- nants among crop seeds and other cargo Figure 2. Steps in becoming an invasive species. 2 A PRIMER ON INVASIVE SPECIES IN COASTAL AND MARINE WATERS new ranges and take our chances on efficiently. For example, Box 2. whether they cause harm by estab- invasive plants typically out Examples of how invasive species harm lishing and spreading. As in any compete natives by shading populations. game of chance, the outcome of a them or using scarce water. O Asian chestnut blight fungus arrived in New York City given round is uncertain. We may When a species interferes on nursery stock early in the 20th century and, within introduce numerous species or one with or harms another in the a few decades, the blight had spread and destroyed species numerous times and suffer no competition for resources, almost all the American chestnuts that had once dominated forests in the eastern United States significant consequences, or we may ecologists call it interference (disease) introduce a single species once and competition. Invasive species generate immense harm. In general, clearly demonstrate this tactic. O predatory Nile perch introduced into Africa’s Lake Victoria has eliminated or gravely threatens more species cause harm by affecting plant For example, many invasive than 200 of the 300 to 500 native species of small, and animal populations or commu- animals exhibit aggressive cichlid fishes (predation) nities, ecosystems and ecosystem behavior that drives native O feral and domestic cats introduced to every part of services, or our economy. animals out of their natural the world have depleted breeding populations of ranges, and invasive plants may seabirds and endemic land birds on oceanic islands Effects on populations produce
Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Galveston Bay Invasive Animal Field Guide TCEQ Contract Number 582-8-84976
    Final Report Galveston Bay Invasive Animal Field Guide TCEQ Contract Number 582-8-84976 August 2010 Prepared For: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Galveston Bay Estuary Program 17041 El Camino Real, Ste. 210 Houston, Texas 77058 GBEP Project Manager Lindsey Lippert Prepared By: Geotechnology Research Institute (GTRI) Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC) 4800 Research Forest Drive The Woodlands, Texas 77381 Principal Investigator Lisa A. Gonzalez [email protected] Prepared in Cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The preparation of this report was financed through grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality www.galvbayinvasives.org Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary _______________________________________________________4 2 Introduction ______________________________________________________________5 3 Project Methodology _______________________________________________________6 3.1 Invasive Species Chosen for Inclusion______________________________________ 6 3.2 Data Collection and Database Creation _____________________________________ 6 3.3 Creation and Printing of the Field Guide ____________________________________ 6 3.4 Website Development __________________________________________________ 7 4 Project Results ____________________________________________________________7 4.1 Hard Copy, Field Guide Printing __________________________________________ 7 4.2 Website Use __________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • What Characteristics Do All Invasive Species Share That Make Them So
    Invasive Plants Facts and Figures Definition Invasive Plant: Plants that have, or are likely to spread into native or minimally managed plant systems and cause economic or environmental harm by developing self-sustaining populations and becoming dominant or disruptive to those systems. Where do most invasive species come from? How do they get here and get started? Most originate long distances from the point of introduction Horticulture is responsible for the introduction of approximately 60% of invasive species. Conservation uses are responsible for the introduction of approximately 30% of invasive species. Accidental introductions account for about 10%. Of all non-native species introduced only about 15% ever escape cultivation, and of this 15% only about 1% ever become a problem in the wild. The process that leads to a plant becoming an invasive species, Cultivation – Escape – Naturalization – Invasion, may take over 100 years to complete. What characteristics make invasive species so successful in our environment? Lack predators, pathogens, and diseases to keep population numbers in check Produce copious amounts of seed with a high viability of that seed Use successful dispersal mechanisms – attractive to wildlife Thrive on disturbance, very opportunistic Fast-growing Habitat generalists. They do not have specific or narrow growth requirements. Some demonstrate alleleopathy – produce chemicals that inhibit the growth of other plants nearby. Have longer photosynthetic periods – first to leaf out in the spring and last to drop leaves in autumn Alter soil and habitat conditions where they grow to better suit their own survival and expansion. Why do we care? What is the big deal? Ecological Impacts Impacting/altering natural communities at a startling rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Latitudinal Shifts of Introduced Species: Possible Causes and Implications
    Biol Invasions (2012) 14:547–556 DOI 10.1007/s10530-011-0094-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Latitudinal shifts of introduced species: possible causes and implications Qinfeng Guo • Dov F. Sax • Hong Qian • Regan Early Received: 26 January 2011 / Accepted: 22 August 2011 / Published online: 4 September 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011 Abstract This study aims to document shifts in the those in their native ranges. Only a small fraction of latitudinal distributions of non-native species relative species examined (i.e.\20% of animals and\10% of to their own native distributions and to discuss plants) have expanded their distributions in their possible causes and implications of these shifts. We exotic range beyond both high- and low-limits of used published and newly compiled data on inter- their native latitudes. Birds, mammals and plants continentally introduced birds, mammals and plants. tended to shift their exotic ranges in similar ways. In We found strong correlations between the latitudinal addition, most non-native species (65–85% in differ- distributions occupied by species in their native and ent groups) have not reached the distributional extent exotic ranges. However, relatively more non-native observed in their native ranges. The possible drivers species occur at latitudes higher than those in their of latitudinal shifts in the exotic range may include native ranges, and fewer occur at latitudes lower than climate change, greater biotic resistance at lower latitudes, historical limitations on ranges in native regions, and the impacts of humans on species Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10530-011-0094-8) contains distributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Success of Seeding Native Compared with Introduced Perennial Vegetation for Revegetating Medusahead-Invaded Sagebrush Rangeland
    Success of Seeding Native Compared with Introduced Perennial Vegetation for Revegetating Medusahead-Invaded Sagebrush Rangeland Davies, K. W., Boyd, C. S., Johnson, D. D., Nafus, A. M., & Madsen, M. D. (2015). Success of seeding native compared with introduced perennial vegetation for revegetating medusahead-invaded sagebrush rangeland. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 68(3), 224-230. doi:10.1016/j.rama.2015.03.004 0.1016/j.rama.2015.03.004 Elsevier Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Rangeland Ecology & Management 68 (2015) 224–230 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Rangeland Ecology & Management journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rama Success of Seeding Native Compared with Introduced Perennial Vegetation for Revegetating Medusahead-Invaded Sagebrush Rangeland☆,☆☆ K.W. Davies a,⁎,C.S.Boyda,D.D.Johnsonb,A.M.Nafusc,M.D.Madsend a Rangeland Scientists, USDA—Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, OR 97720, USA 1 b Associate Professor, Oregon State University, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, OR 97720, USA c Research Associate, Oregon State University, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, OR 97720, USA d Ecologist, USDA—Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, OR 97720, USA 1 article info abstract Article history: Millions of hectares of Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. subsp. wyomingensis Beetle Received 16 October 2014 &Young) rangeland have been invaded by medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae [L.] Nevski), an exot- Accepted 2 March 2015 ic annual grass that degrades wildlife habitat, reduces forage production, and decreases biodiversity. Reveg- etation of medusahead-invaded sagebrush plant communities is necessary to restore ecosystem services.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Species and the Cultural Keystone Species Concept
    Copyright © 2005 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Nuñez, M. A., and D. Simberloff. 2005. Invasive species and the cultural keystone species concept. Ecology and Society 10(1): r4. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/resp4/ Response to Garibaldi and Turner. 2004. “Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for Ecological Conservation and Restoration” Invasive Species and the Cultural Keystone Species Concept Martin A. Nuñez1 and Daniel Simberloff1 Key Words: biological invasions ; cultural keystone species; conservation; exotic species; invasive species; keystone species The concept of the keystone species (Paine 1966, (Mooney and Hobbs 2000, Simberloff 2000), 1969, Power et al. 1996) has been a transformative serving as cultural icons in different areas of the notion in ecology. Keystone species were originally world. Examples of this include Eucalyptus in narrowly defined to be those whose importance to California, tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) in community and ecosystem structure, composition, Italy, bluegrass (Poa pratensis) in Kentucky, and function is disproportionate to their abundance. Cannabis sativa in Jamaica, bananas (Musa Even this narrow definition fostered great insight paradisiaca) in Ecuador, horses (Equus caballus) into the nature of particular ecosystems and of in the western United States, coffee (Coffea spp) in threats to them (Power et al. 1996). However, in Colombia, and kudzu (Pueraria montana) in the ecological circles the term came to be more casually southeastern United States. used to mean any species that has a very large impact on the ecosystem, no matter how abundant it is More than 100 species of Australian Eucalyptus (Simberloff 2003), and this casual usage has led to trees have been brought to California since the late attacks on the concept on the grounds that it is so 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Differences in Vertical Phosphorus Profiles Within the Sediments of Selected Florida Lakes As Related to Trophic Dynamics
    University of Central Florida STARS Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 1976 A Study of Differences in Vertical Phosphorus Profiles Within the Sediments of Selected Florida Lakes as Related to Trophic Dynamics Edgar Allen Stewart III University of Central Florida, [email protected] Part of the Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/rtd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Stewart, Edgar Allen III, "A Study of Differences in Vertical Phosphorus Profiles Within the Sediments of Selected Florida Lakes as Related to Trophic Dynamics" (1976). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 258. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/rtd/258 • A STUDY OF DIFFEREilCES IN VERTICAL PHOSPHORUS PRO FILES WliHIN THE SEDIMENTS OF SELECTED FLORIUA LAKES AS [{ELATED TO °fROPfiiC DYNArHCS BY EDGAR ALLE N STEHART III B.S., University of Florida, 1971 THESIS SubmHted o'n partial fulfiliment of the requirements for the degree of Mdster of Science °in the Graduate Studies Program of the Co 11 eye of Engi neer i ng of Florida Technological University , Or l ando, Florida 1976 • A STUDY OF DIFFERENCES IN VERTICAL PHOSPHOROUS PROFILES WITHIN THE SEDIMENTS OF SELECTED FLORIDA LAKES AS RELATED TO TROPHIC DYNAMICS BY E. ALLEIJ STEWART I II \ ABSTRACT Seve"a 1 Flori da 1akes with different docu'llcnted traphi c sta te indi ces were se lected for sediment analysis .
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Native Plants
    - AA GUIDEGUIDE TOTO THETHE NATIVENATIVE PLANTS,PLANTS, NATURALNATURAL PLANTPLANT COMMUNITIESCOMMUNITIES ANDAND THETHE EXOTICEXOTIC ANDAND INVASIVEINVASIVE SPECIESSPECIES OFOF EASTEAST HAMPTONHAMPTON TOWNTOWN EAST HAMPTON TOWN Natural Resources Department TableTable ofof Contents:Contents: Spotted Beebalm (Monarda punctata) Narrative: Pages 1-17 Quick Reference Max Clearing Table: Page 18 Map: East Hampton Native Plant Habitats Map TABS: East Hampton Plant Habitats (1-12); Wetlands flora (13-15): 1. Outer Dunes Plant Spacing 2. Bay Bluffs 3. Amagansett Inner Dunes (AID) 4. Tidal Marsh (TM) Table: A 5. Montauk Mesic Forest (MMF) 6. Montauk Moorland (MM) guideline for the 7. North of Moraine Coastal Deciduous (NMCD) 8. Morainal Deciduous (MD) 9. Pine Barrens or Pitch Pine Oak Forest (PB) (PPO) number of 10. Montauk Grasslands (MG) 11. Northwest Woods (NWW) plants needed 12. Old Fields 13. Freshwater Wetlands 14. Brackish Wetlands and Buffer for an area: 15. East Hampton Wetland Flora by Type Page 19 Native Plants-Resistance to Deer Damage: Pages 20-21 Local Native Plant Landscapers, Arborists, Native Plant Growers and Suppliers: Pages 22-23 Exotic and Invasive Species: Pages 24-33 Native Wildflower Pictures: Pages 34-45 Samdplain Gerardia (Agalinas acuta) Introduction to our native landscape What is a native plant? Native plants are plants that are indigenous to a particular area or region. In North America we are referring to the flora that existed in an area or region before European settlement. Native plants occur within specific plant communities that vary in species composition depending on the habitat in which they are found. A few examples of habitats are tidal wetlands, woodlands, meadows and dunelands.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating and Mitigating Introduction of Marine Non-Native Species Via Vessel Biofouling
    ICES AD HOC REPORT 2019 ICES Viewpoint background document: Evaluating and mitigating introduction of marine non-native species via vessel biofouling Editors Bella S. Galil ● Cynthia McKenzie Authors Bella S. Galil ● Cynthia McKenzie ● Sarah Bailey Marnie Campbell ● Ian Davidson ● Lisa Drake ● Chad Hewitt Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi ● Richard Piola International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: Galil, B.S., McKenzie, C., Bailey, S., Campbell M., Davidson, I., Drake, L., Hewitt, C., Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A., and Piola, R. 2019. ICES Viewpoint background document: Evaluating and mitigating introduction of marine non-native species via vessel bio- fouling. ICES Ad Hoc Report 2019. 17 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.4680 For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the mate- rial in this report may be reused using the recommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has ownership. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the original copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on the ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other reproduction requests please contact the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Structures and Levels of Connectivity for Scyphozoan and Cubozoan Jellyfish
    diversity Review Population Structures and Levels of Connectivity for Scyphozoan and Cubozoan Jellyfish Michael J. Kingsford * , Jodie A. Schlaefer and Scott J. Morrissey Marine Biology and Aquaculture, College of Science and Engineering and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia; [email protected] (J.A.S.); [email protected] (S.J.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Understanding the hierarchy of populations from the scale of metapopulations to mesopop- ulations and member local populations is fundamental to understanding the population dynamics of any species. Jellyfish by definition are planktonic and it would be assumed that connectivity would be high among local populations, and that populations would minimally vary in both ecological and genetic clade-level differences over broad spatial scales (i.e., hundreds to thousands of km). Although data exists on the connectivity of scyphozoan jellyfish, there are few data on cubozoans. Cubozoans are capable swimmers and have more complex and sophisticated visual abilities than scyphozoans. We predict, therefore, that cubozoans have the potential to have finer spatial scale differences in population structure than their relatives, the scyphozoans. Here we review the data available on the population structures of scyphozoans and what is known about cubozoans. The evidence from realized connectivity and estimates of potential connectivity for scyphozoans indicates the following. Some jellyfish taxa have a large metapopulation and very large stocks (>1000 s of km), while others have clade-level differences on the scale of tens of km. Data on distributions, genetics of medusa and Citation: Kingsford, M.J.; Schlaefer, polyps, statolith shape, elemental chemistry of statoliths and biophysical modelling of connectivity J.A.; Morrissey, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae: Mastigiidae) from Turkey
    Aquatic Invasions (2011) Volume 6, Supplement 1: S27–S28 doi: 10.3391/ai.2011.6.S1.006 Open Access © 2011 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2011 REABIC Aquatic Invasions Records First record of Phyllorhiza punctata von Lendenfeld, 1884 (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae: Mastigiidae) from Turkey Cem Cevik1*, Osman Baris Derici1, Fatma Cevik1 and Levent Cavas2 1Çukurova University, Faculty of Fisheries, Balcalı, Adana, Turkey 2Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Division of Biochemistry, Kaynaklar Campus, İzmir, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] (CC), [email protected] (OBD), [email protected] (FC), [email protected] (LC) *Corresponding author Received: 1 December 2010 / Accepted: 11 April 2011/ Published online: 7 May 2011 Abstract The Australian spotted jellyfish Phyllorhiza punctata has been reported from several locations in the Mediterranean, but the present report is the first record from Turkish waters. Juveniles of the Erythrean alien shrimp scad, Alepes djedaba, were observed nestling among its tentacles. Possible vectors are mentioned. Key words: Phyllorhiza punctata, Alepes djedaba, Turkey, non-indigenous species bay of İskenderun (36º44.550N, 36º10.716E, Introduction salinity 38.6 PSU, sea water temperature 25.7ºC). The specimen was kept for 24 hours in a Phyllorhiza punctata von Lendenfeld, 1884 seawater aquarium and then preserved and (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae: Mastigiidae) deposited in the museum of Faculty of Fisheries originates in the tropical western Pacific at Çukurova University in Adana (CSFM- (Graham et al. 2003). The species has been CNI/2010-01). widely introduced in the Atlantic (Mienzan and Cornelius 1999; Cutress 1973; Silveira and Cornelius 2000; Graham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Can More K-Selected Species Be Better Invaders?
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2007) 13, 535–543 Blackwell Publishing Ltd BIODIVERSITY Can more K-selected species be better RESEARCH invaders? A case study of fruit flies in La Réunion Pierre-François Duyck1*, Patrice David2 and Serge Quilici1 1UMR 53 Ӷ Peuplements Végétaux et ABSTRACT Bio-agresseurs en Milieu Tropical ӷ CIRAD Invasive species are often said to be r-selected. However, invaders must sometimes Pôle de Protection des Plantes (3P), 7 chemin de l’IRAT, 97410 St Pierre, La Réunion, France, compete with related resident species. In this case invaders should present combina- 2UMR 5175, CNRS Centre d’Ecologie tions of life-history traits that give them higher competitive ability than residents, Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), 1919 route de even at the expense of lower colonization ability. We test this prediction by compar- Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex, France ing life-history traits among four fruit fly species, one endemic and three successive invaders, in La Réunion Island. Recent invaders tend to produce fewer, but larger, juveniles, delay the onset but increase the duration of reproduction, survive longer, and senesce more slowly than earlier ones. These traits are associated with higher ranks in a competitive hierarchy established in a previous study. However, the endemic species, now nearly extinct in the island, is inferior to the other three with respect to both competition and colonization traits, violating the trade-off assumption. Our results overall suggest that the key traits for invasion in this system were those that *Correspondence: Pierre-François Duyck, favoured competition rather than colonization. CIRAD 3P, 7, chemin de l’IRAT, 97410, Keywords St Pierre, La Réunion Island, France.
    [Show full text]