DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Public Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Public Comments Sree Nampoothiri From: Keith Jasper Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 5:03 PM To: Sree Nampoothiri Cc: Yolanda Thomas-Jones Subject: FW: Over the Fencepost Community Newsletter May Mid-Month 2018 Just realized you were not copied on this one. From: Monica Backmon Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 4:52 PM To: Keith Jasper <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Over the Fencepost Community Newsletter May Mid‐Month 2018 Monica Backmon Executive Director 703‐642‐4650 (O) 571‐355‐4176 (C) Northern Virginia Transportation Authority The Authority for Transportation in Northern Virginia 3040 Williams Drive ® Suite 200 ® Fairfax, VA 22031 www.TheNoVaAuthority.org Begin forwarded message: From: "Nohe, Marty E." <[email protected]> Date: May 19, 2018 at 4:38:23 PM EDT To: "Calder, Bob" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Over the Fencepost Community Newsletter May Mid‐Month 2018 Mr. Calder‐ Thank you for taking the time to share these comments with me and with the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority. I will pass these on to the NVTA staff and asked that your comment to be included as part of the public record. I will share with you that each of the three corridors which you identified as a priority for Prince William County are being considered for funding by the NVTA this year, and some of them are also being considered for funding from the Commonwealth transportation board next year. Generally speaking, the NVTA does not fund improvements to interstate highways as these projects are generally considered to be the responsibility of the Commonwealth, and because any interstate improvements that we might make will usually be of a magnitude that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to fund them using the limited regional funds that are managed by the NVTA. That said, the 1 NVTA is considering funding improvements along Route 1 in the town of Dumfries to provide additional congestion relief for those days when I‐95 becomes particularly problematic, which will be coupled with the other improvements that we have made, or are in the process of making, along other sections of Route 1 in Woodbridge as well as in Fairfax County. I will also share that Prince William County has requested funding from the Commonwealth Transportation Board to add an additional lane to I‐95 southbound from the Route 123 exit to the Prince William Parkway or to Route 234. That project has not yet been funded, but will continue to be a priority for the Bard of County Supervisors. Improvements along the Route 234 bypass are a top priority for the Prince William Board of County Supervisors and we have requested $172 million in funding for five projects to upgrade all of the intersections north of Lake Jackson to grad‐ separated interchanges to allow more throughput and eliminate the need for drivers to queue at red lights during congested periods. Prince William County has already received approval for funding for an interchange at Balls Ford Road, and I am optimistic that the NVTA well find at least one or two of the interchange improvements on Route 234 that will dramatically increase traffic flow and provide for better travel along this heavily congested corridor. You may have noticed that the county is also coming into the last steps of a project to improve the intersection at route 234 and Hoadly Road, and while this specific improvement is small on scope, we believe that they will have a big impact on travel flows at that intersection when they are open later this month. Route 28 is not only the top priority for Prince William County, but for all of the other jurisdictions through which this highway passes as well. Prince William County, the city of Manassas, the city of Manassas Park, and Fairfax County have collectively requested over $200 million dollars from the NVTA in the next six years to add capacity to the route 28 corridor. In Prince William County, where widening Route 28 through the Yorkshire neighborhood would be shockingly expensive and unnecessarily impactful on existing commercial businesses, the county is planning a bypass Road that extends Godwin Drive west of the city of Manassas around the Yorkshire neighborhood so that it can reconnect to Route 28 at or near the Bull Run bridge. Fairfax county has sufficient right of way to widen Route 28 between the Prince William County line and US 29 to as much as eight lanes as necessary and is currently designing that project for construction over the next several years. All of these improvements will tie in to the upgraded interchange at I_66 and US 28 which will be constructed as part of the I‐66 outside the beltway express lanes project. All told, The NVTA and the Commonwealth will be investing approximately $650 million into this corridor over the next several years. Any project of this magnitude certainly takes some time to plan, design, and construct. Please rest assured that congestion relief on Northern Virginia’s most crowded highway will continue to be a top priority for Prince William County and the NVTA until the problem is off. I hope this feedback is helpful. If you have any questions, or at my office can assist you in any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at any time. Yours‐ Marty Nohe Martin E Nohe Coles District Supervisor 703-792-4620 County Mailstop EA707 www.facebook.com/Coles.District www.colesdistrict.org 2 From: Calder, Bob [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 8:48 AM To: Nohe, Marty E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Over the Fencepost Community Newsletter May Mid‐Month 2018 I did a quick review of the proposed 60 transportation items and I guess I am missing something. I don’t see where it addresses what I think are the priorities for PWC: 1. Alleviation of traffic on I-95: Fredricksburg to Springfield is a nightmare everyday and worse on weekends in the summer. There are delays each morning just getting to I-95 each morning. I’d like to see what the NVTA thinks the bottlenecks are and what could address these. Perhaps another way to get to Route 123 across the Occoquan would help get people from PWC into Fairfax? Perhaps there are significant number of people that need another crossing into Maryland—perhaps warranting a crossing near quanitco across the Potomac? Or another river crossing in or around fredricksburg to alleviate the daily bottleneck there. Perhaps more would use metro or the VRE if the parking wasn’t full or ??? I guess it would be nice to have data to show the bottlenecks then a plan to resolve them. 2. The increased traffic on Rt 234….the bypass has made put this road at or above capacity each morning and evening, with much of the traffic being trucks. Planning should ensure that it doesn’t become more clogged. With Colgan high school causing additional delays each morning, afternoon, and on many many nights, I would have hoped to see some improvements to this access included in the plan. 3. Route 28 remains a disaster. Again with data, I would hope that you have collected why/where most of the traffic is headed to see if this can be mitigated. Are the users continuing north of I66, or dropping off at I-66? Would some of this be diverted if there was another path across the Occoquan (perhaps extend hoadly north to 123). I know that major development will be unpopular with a NIMBY sentiment, but the plans laid out look like small tweaks in local areas to get support of each member vs a master plan that will have a meaningful impact across the region. Bob Calder Lockheed Martin RMS Phone: 703-367-3719 or cell: 571-228-6587 From: Nohe, Marty E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 2:12 PM To: BOCS Coles District <[email protected]> Subject: EXTERNAL: Over the Fencepost Community Newsletter May Mid‐Month 2018 Dear Neighbor- Attached is the May 2018 edition of my Community Newsletter, Over the Fencepost. To open the newsletter, you will need Adobe Reader. Free software can be downloaded from this website: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html. The Northern Virginia Transportation Authority will be holding a Town Hall in Prince William County on Thursday, May 17 at Loch Lomond Elementary at 7 pm. The subject will be NVTA’s Six Year Program. 3 More information on the program, including a list of the projects in Prince William, are on page 1 of the newsletter. The Transportation Planning Board will be holding a Public Forum on May 23 at 7 pm to solicit comments on their Visualize2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan. The Public Forum will be held at the McCoart Building in the Board Chambers. Background information on the plan and topics to be covered are on page 4 of the newsletter. We are aware that some people are receiving more than one copy of this message. If this applies to you, or if you would like to unsubscribe to this newsletter, please let me know and we’ll clean up the list. Have a good weekend! -Marty Nohe Martin E Nohe Coles District Supervisor 703-792-4620 https://www.facebook.com/Coles.District www.colesdistrict.org 4 Coalition for Smarter Growth • Piedmont Environmental Council Prince William Conservation Alliance • Sierra Club Virginia Chapter • Southern Environmental Law Center May 9, 2018 Hon. Martin Nohe Chairman, Northern Virginia Transportation Authority 3040 Williams Drive, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22031 Dear Chairman Nohe and Members of the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority: The Coalition for Smarter Growth, The Piedmont Environmental Council and Prince William Conservation Alliance are submitting these comments on NVTA’s 6-year plan (FY2018-23).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MOBILITY WORK SESSION Prince William County Department of Transportation Overview
    5-A-1 MOBILITY WORK SESSION Prince William County Department of Transportation Overview Rick Canizales Department of Transportation February 9, 2021 WHO ARE WE? We are your Department of Transportation The mission of the Department of Transportation is to consistently improve the transportation network and meet the needs of our growing community. Our goals include easing the flow of traffic and improving travel within Prince William County; providing transportation options for residents and visitors and creating and maintaining safe traveling conditions. In order to meet these goals, we work with a wide variety of local, regional, state and federal partners. In addition, we manage Capital Improvement Projects and work with the Board of County Supervisors to find effective solutions that resolve transportation issues. As a result of these efforts, Prince William County has been able to produce a $1 Billion Capital Improvement Program of Projects • Largest construction program by a locality in the State of Virginia • Larger than several of VDOT’s Construction Districts 2 Mobility Work Session | Tuesday, February 9, 2021 WHAT DO WE DO? PWC DOT implements various multi‐modal projects and considers all transportation modes to include the following examples: • Roadway • Intersection • Interchange • Sidewalk/Trails • Commuter Parking/Garage • Transit related improvements • Traffic safety related improvements How did we do it? History of Bond Referendums 1988 Road Bond ‐ $66M (60% approval) 1990 Road Bond ‐ $43M (65% approval) 1994 Road Bond
    [Show full text]
  • I-95 Corridor Transit and TDM Plan DRAFT
    I‐95 Corridor Transit and TDM Plan Technical Memorandum #1: Existing Service Characteristics DRAFT Prepared for: Prepared by: September 20, 2011 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 I‐95 HOT/HOV Lane Project Definition ...................................................................................... 2 3.0 Demographic Characteristics and Trends .................................................................................. 5 3.1 Demographic Characteristics and Trends ..................................................................................... 5 3.2 Northern Corridor Characteristics (Fairfax and Prince William Counties) .................................... 9 3.3 Southern Corridor Characteristics (Stafford and Spotsylvania Counties) ................................... 23 4.0 Travel Pattern Characteristics ................................................................................................. 37 4.1 Existing Worker Travel Flows ...................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Projected Home‐Based Work Trips ............................................................................................. 40 5.0 Existing Transit Service Providers ............................................................................................ 42 5.1 Fairfax Connector .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Parkway (Including Entrance and Exit Ramps)
    TransAction 2040 Plan Projects and National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Constrained Long Range Plan Projects Corridor 1 – Dulles/VA 7 Corridor 3 – VA 28 2011-2040 CLRP Projects 2011-2040 CLRP Projects Projects Capital Cost Estimates (in Millions) Projects Capital Cost Estimates (in Millions) Highway Highway 340 Construct Battlefield Parkway from U.S. 15 South of Leesburg to U.S. 15 Bypass north ..........................................$45.0 Construct interchanges along VA 28 between I-66 and VA 7 and widen to 8 lanes ............................................... $100.0 Widen Dulles Access Road from 4 to 6 lanes from Dulles Airport to VA 123 .................................................................$40.0 Reconstruct VA 28 adjacent to its existing alignment and construct overpass of Widen U.S. 15 to 4 lanes from Evergreen Mill Road to south city line of Leesburg ...................................................... $9.3 Norfolk-Southern Railroad B Line and an overpass of/interchange with Wellington Road ..............................$24.9 Construct an interchange on U.S. 15 Bypass at Edwards Ferry Road ..............................................................................$27.0 Widen Wellington Road to 4 lanes from Godwin Drive to VA 28 (Nokesville Road) ...................................................$15.7 Construct an interchange on VA 7 at VA 659 (Belmont Ridge Road) ...............................................................................$72.0 Trails Widen VA 7 to 6 lanes from Seven Corners
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Metropolitan Region Transportation Demand Management
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN REGION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT RESOURCE GUIDE AND STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN Version 12.0 FY09 Final Report December 2008 PREPARED BY: COG/TPB Staff in conjunction with the COMMUTER CONNECTIONS REGIONAL TDM MARKETING GROUP - Table of Contents - FY09 TDM Resource Guide and SMP ~ Section One ~ Background……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 4 Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 6 Regional Activity Centers………………………………………………………………………………………Page 8 Mission Statement ………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 9 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 10 Guiding Principles of Strategic Marketing Plan……………………………………………………………Page 12 Key Findings and Strategic Implications……………………………………………………………………Page 13 Summary of Proposed Strategy for FY 2009…………………………………………………………………Page 15 ~ Section Two ~ Regional Profile……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 17 Product Profiles……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 19 Carpools and Vanpools…………………………………………………………………………………………Page 20 HOV Lanes………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 23 Transit…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 30 Table – Summary of Bus Activity………………………………………………………………………………Page 32 Table – Summary of Rail Activity………………………………………………………………………………Page 36 Table - Summary of Park & Ride Activity………………………………………………………………………Page 38 Telework………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 40 Bicycling………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 42 Bike Sharing……………………………………………………………….…….…………..………..….Page 45 Car Sharing………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page
    [Show full text]
  • Transaction 2040 Summary
    TransAction 2040 Plan Projects and National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Constrained Long Range Plan Projects Corridor 1 – Dulles/VA 7 Corridor 3 – VA 28 2011-2040 CLRP Projects 2011-2040 CLRP Projects Projects Capital Cost Estimates (in Millions) Projects Capital Cost Estimates (in Millions) Highway Highway 340 Construct Battlefield Parkway from U.S. 15 South of Leesburg to U.S. 15 Bypass north ..........................................$45.0 Construct interchanges along VA 28 between I-66 and VA 7 and widen to 8 lanes ............................................... $100.0 Widen Dulles Access Road from 4 to 6 lanes from Dulles Airport to VA 123 .................................................................$40.0 Reconstruct VA 28 adjacent to its existing alignment and construct overpass of Widen U.S. 15 to 4 lanes from Evergreen Mill Road to south city line of Leesburg ...................................................... $9.3 Norfolk-Southern Railroad B Line and an overpass of/interchange with Wellington Road ..............................$24.9 Construct an interchange on U.S. 15 Bypass at Edwards Ferry Road ..............................................................................$27.0 Widen Wellington Road to 4 lanes from Godwin Drive to VA 28 (Nokesville Road) ...................................................$15.7 Construct an interchange on VA 7 at VA 659 (Belmont Ridge Road) ...............................................................................$72.0 Trails Widen VA 7 to 6 lanes from Seven Corners
    [Show full text]
  • County of Prince William 5 County Complex Court, Suite 290 Prince William, Virginia 22192-9201
    X. NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY M E M O R A N D U M TO: Chairman Martin E. Nohe and Members Northern Virginia Transportation Authority FROM: Monica Backmon, Executive Director DATE: September 6, 2018 SUBJECT: Executive Director’s Report ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Purpose: To inform the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) of items of interest not addressed in other agenda items. 2. Project Status Updates With 78 executed Standard Project Agreements (SPAs) already in place, and another 44 SPAs set to follow through the recently adopted 2018-2023 Six Year Program, NVTA staff are in the process of enhancing their oversight and coordination activities. These enhanced activities will provide Authority members and others with greater insights regarding the status of projects funded with NVTA revenues (regional and local). Starting in fall 2018, jurisdictional and agency staff will periodically meet with and brief NVTA staff on the status of projects with approved SPAs. These briefings, which are expected to occur every 3-6 months, will include: schedule updates; project funding and SPA billings; risk identification and mitigation; upcoming milestones, including groundbreaking and ribbon-cuttings; and overview of major projects using local distribution (30%) revenues. Also starting in Fall 2018, NVTA staff will present a series of briefings to the Authority on project status and key trends in each of the region’s transportation corridors. The purpose of these briefings is to raise awareness of the Authority’s investments across the region. The first presentation is tentatively scheduled for the October meeting, will focus on the I-95/Route 1/VRE Fredericksburg Line corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Visioning Mobility Beyond Boundaries
    Visioning Mobility Beyond Boundaries FINAL November 2012 PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation PROJECT MANAGER: Amy Inman, M.S. Manager of Transit Planning Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation 600 East Main Street, Suite 2102 Richmond, VA 23219 PREPARED BY: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Public input and stakeholder’s input from each county, metropolitan planning organization, and public transportation operating agency throughout the Super NoVa region MISSION ACHIEVED: Vision Mobility Beyond Boundaries The DRPT is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, its services on the basis of race, color, or national origin, as protected by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For additional information on DRPT’s nondiscrimination policies and procedures or to file a complaint, please visit the website at www.drpt.virginia.gov or contact the Title VI Compliance Officer, Linda Maiden, 600 E. Main Street, Suite 2102, Richmond, VA 23219. Visioning Mobility Beyond Boundaries FINAL November 2012 Super NoVa Transit/TDM Vision Plan | Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation i TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ...........................................................................1 Introduction ..............................................................................................3 From Congestion Relief to Transportation Choice .....................................................3 Mobility .......................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac Mills and I-95 Land for Sale
    LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONED LAND FOR SALE / LEASE 14009 TELEGRAPH ROAD Woodbridge, VA 22192 82,358 SF Proposed Class A Flex Buildings Prince William Parkway (VA-3000) POTOMACPOTOMAC MILLSMILLS Telegraph Road 14009 Telegraph Road, Woodbridge, VA 22192 9.09 AC, Total Building Area Proposed: 82,358 SF PPrriiimmee IIInndduussttrriiiaalll LLaanndd FFoorr SSaalllee // LLeeaassee Property Location & Summary 14009 Telegraph Rd, Woodbridge, VA 22192, Prince William County, Potomac Mills / I-95 Corridor Industrial Submarket Purchase Price: $2,771,723 ($304,920.02 / AC) Site Size: 9.09 AC (395,960.4 SF); Parcel ID: 8392-01-0281 Zoned: M-2, Light Industrial Zoning Washington Dulles Utilities: Public water, sewer & utilities available to site International Airport Max Building Height: 60’; Max F.A.R.: 0.50 Ronald Reagan Total Building Proposed: 82,358 (198,198 SF Allowable) Washington Property Highlights: National Airport Raw land opportunity to add value & ready for development Perfect for Offices, Schools, Business Park, Wholesaling, Future FBI Headquarters Self-Storage Center, or other light industrial uses Manassas Regional Airport Great visibility from I-95 with 159,558± Traffic Count, and Fort Belvoir South Monument Signage potential on Telegraph Road Fort Belvoir North Easy Access: Prince William Parkway is 0.3 miles from the site, Interstate 95 (I-95) is 1.3 miles away, Opitz Blvd is 1.2 miles away and Dale Blvd is 1.9 miles away from the site Marine Corps Base Horner Road Commuter Parking Lot is 1.2 mi / 5 mins away, & Woodbridge Amtrak / VRE is 3.3 mi / 9 mins away Quantico Fort Belvoir is 11.9 mi, 22 mins away & 13.15 mi, 19 mins to Marine Corps Base Quantico Reagan National Airport is 22.5 miles / 33 mins away & Stafford Regional Dulles International Airport is 38.8 miles / 47 mins Airport For more information, please contact: Post Office Box 686 Springfield, Virginia 22150 Guy Travers, Principal Broker P: 703.339.0100 703.339.0100 rlt F: 703.550.8815 [email protected] R.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Bi-County Parkway Executive Summary
    Rethinking the Bi-County Parkway Executive Summary Download and read the full report at smartergrowth.net/BCPreport The Virginia Department of Transportation's ("VDOT") own traffic modeling data reveal that the proposed Bi-County Parkway (“BCP") would worsen, not relieve, traffic congestion. The same model shows that the comprehensive alternative offered by our coalition (termed the “Substitute Vision” by VDOT) will better address congestion in the study area, and better serve the dominant need for east-west traffic capacity—now and in the future. By contrast, the BCP would generate more traffic and more congestion in southern Loudoun County and the areas of Prince William County around Manassas National Battlefield Park ("Park"). The Substitute Vision, a package of common-sense solutions, would generate lower traffic volumes, would better serve local trips, and would move traffic around the Park with significantly fewer impacts both to this irreplaceable historic resource and to surrounding communities. In its analysis of the Substitute Vision, VDOT has effectively disclosed that it has not included many of the most sensible and critically necessary projects in the current Six-Year Improvement Program or worked to make sure they are included in the regional priorities plan (the Constrained Long Range Plan). The neglected projects would ease east-west commutes, help travelers on Route 28 between Manassas and Route 7, and improve local traffic in areas with planned development in southern Loudoun and western Prince William counties. Important examples of VDOT’s failure to provide for needed projects are the lack of full funding for the I-66/Route 28 interchange, the absence of any funding for the Route 28/Braddock Road interchange, and the lack of funding for key primary roads in southern Loudoun and western Prince William counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Transportation Status Report
    Attachment 1 Fairfax County Transportation Status Report Prepared by: Department of Transportation Capital Projects and Traffic Engineering Division February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Department of Transportation Summary of Activities and Highlights September 2018 through February 2019 Projects Completed and Under Construction _____________________________________ 1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Programs _______________________________________________ 2 Capital Projects and Traffic Engineering Division __________________________________ 5 Capital Projects Section ____________________________________________________ 5 Traffic Engineering Section __________________________________________________ 6 Communications, Marketing, and Fairfax County Commuter Services _________________ 7 Coordination and Funding Division _____________________________________________ 9 Site Analysis and Transportation Planning Division _______________________________ 15 Site Analysis Section ______________________________________________________ 16 Transportation Planning Section ____________________________________________ 18 Special Projects Division_____________________________________________________ 21 Transit Services Division _____________________________________________________ 23 Transportation Design Division _______________________________________________ 26 County Transportation Priorities Plan __________________________________________ 28 Transportation Priorities Plan: FY2019 – FY2020 Projects ________________________ 28 Legend L-1 Project Status Report P-1
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item #2 – Attachment 2, Transaction
    V.B Transportation Action Plan for Northern Virginia TransAction Plan Project List Draft for Public Comment Spring/Summer 2017 This project list includes a brief Project List: Index by Corridor Segment description of the 358 candidate Segment Description Page regional projects included in 1-1 Rt. 7/Rt. 9 — West Virginia state line to Town of Leesburg 3 TransAction. The projects are 1-2 Rt. 7/Dulles Greenway — Town of Leesburg to Rt. 28 5 listed by Corridor Segment. 1-3 Rt. 7/Dulles Toll Road/Silver Line — Rt. 28 to Tysons 12 Larger projects are listed under 1-4 Rt. 7/Dulles Toll Road/Silver Line — Tysons to US 1 18 each Corridor Segment in which 2-1 Loudoun County Parkway/Belmont Ridge Road — Rt. 7 to US 50 36 they are located, and may 2-2 Bi-County Parkway — US 50 to I-66 42 appear multiple times in this 2-3 Rt. 234 — I-66 to I-95 45 project list. 3-1 Rt. 28 — Rt. 7 to I-66 51 3-2 Rt. 28 — I-66 to Fauquier County Line 56 4-1 Prince William Parkway — I-66 to I-95 60 5-1 Fairfax County Parkway — Rt. 7 to US 50 66 5-2 Fairfax County Parkway — US 50 to Rolling Road 70 5-3 Fairfax County Parkway — Rolling Road to US 1 74 6-1 I-66/US 29/VRE Manassas — Prince William County Line to Rt. 28 78 6-2 I-66/US 29/US 50/Orange Silver Line — Rt. 28 to I-495 84 6-3 I-66/US 29/US 50/Orange Silver Line — I-495 to Potomac River 90 7-1 I-495 — American Legion Bridge to I-66 100 7-2 I-495 — I-66 to I-395 105 7-3 I-495 — I-95 to Woodrow Wilson Bridge 110 I-95/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg — Stafford County Line to Fairfax County 8-1 121 Line 8-2 I-95/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg — Prince William County Line to I-495 127 I-395/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg/Blue Yellow Line — I-495 to Potomac 8-3 137 River 9-1 US 15 — Potomac River to Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • VRE Manassas Park Station Parking Expansion Alternatives Analysis Summary Report
    VRE Manassas Park Station Parking Expansion Alternatives Analysis Summary Report September 18, 2017 VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS | Manassas Park Station Parking Expansion THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS | Manassas Park Station Parking Expansion Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Summary of Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................3 3.0 Parking Demand Forecast ............................................................................................................ 17 4.0 Site Assessment .............................................................................................................................. 20 5.0 Selection of Preferred Parking Expansion Site ..................................................................... 42 6.0 Estimated Cost ................................................................................................................................ 45 7.0 Funding Options ............................................................................................................................ 46 Appendices ..................................................................................................................................................... List of Figures 1 Existing VRE Manassas Station and Surface Parking ............................................................3
    [Show full text]