DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Acknowledgements This Thesis Is by Far the Longest and Most Dense Paper I Have Ever Written, and I Would Not Have Been Able To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Acknowledgements This Thesis Is by Far the Longest and Most Dense Paper I Have Ever Written, and I Would Not Have Been Able To 1 Acknowledgements This Thesis is by far the longest and most dense paper I have ever written, and I would not have been able to complete it without the support, enthusiasm, and inspiration of many individuals. I want to first thank my high school Latin and history teacher, Mr. David Jackson, for instilling in me a love of Classical antiquity. Without his influence, I would have never majored in history and Classics at this awesome University, and would have never had the chance to write this paper. I would also like to extend my thanks to my friends and family, especially my older brother McCabe. His enthusiasm for the ancient world matches my own, and his interest in my research has kept me engaged. In addition, I must give praise to my fellow honors students. I had the pleasure of seeing several of your presentations, and I was blown away by how thorough and interesting your research was. You guys make history interesting for those who might find it boring. I want to think Mr. Jonathan Scholl and Dr. Andrea Sterk for keeping us all afloat the last eight months. The constant emails, reminders, advice, and assistance were crucial in helping us to stay organized and alert. And finally, I want to thank Dr. Andrea Sterk again as my thesis advisor. She has been so patient and supportive from day one, and her suggestions and attention to detail helped me to continuously improve this work each time I sent her a new chapter or draft. I fear what this paper might look like without her mentorship. - Connor Harrison, April 23rd, 2014 2 Table of Contents Introduction: How Christianity would Flourish in the Rome’s Darkest Time 3 Chapter I: Analysis of a Conflicted Historiography and the Decentralized 8 Model of Religion in the Pre-Barracks Age Chapter II: Philip the Arab, The First Christian Emperor? 15 Chapter III: Decius, Christian Villain or Pagan Champion? 23 Chapter VI: Valerian, The True Villain and Gallienus, The True Ally 35 Conclusion: How Structural Unification Set the Stage for Christian Prosperity 46 Bibliography 49 3 Introduction: How Christianity would Flourish in the Rome’s Darkest Time The Church as the vehicle of salvation must exhibit unity as well as purity, as a mark of its true and enduring transcendental character, uncontaminated by the world’s corruption that is a sign of its metaphysical disorder awaiting renewal.1 – Allen Brent The history of Christianity and its rise to prominence over the course of the Roman Empire is to this day shrouded in mystery. There are many different historical perspectives on how and why Christianity was able to take a foothold in the Roman Empire and finally be championed by Constantine, Theodosius, and other late rulers. While Christianity did not become publically accepted by the centralized government until those rulers in the fourth century A.D., it nonetheless had been spreading throughout the Mediterranean world since the crucifixion of Jesus Christ circa 33 A.D. during the reign of Rome’s second emperor, Tiberius. From that point, there were many significant figures, emperors among them, who influenced the development of Christianity. This paper will focus on four emperors of the barracks period of the mid-third century—Marcus Junius Philippus (Philip the Arab), Trajan Decius, Licinius Valerianus (Valerian) and Licinius Gallienus--and explore how their policies and attitudes towards Christianity shaped the church during this period. The barracks period, from 235 A.D. to 284 A.D., was a tumultuous period in the history of Imperial Rome, a period during which much territory was lost. It saw the quick succession of military rulers with several coups and uprisings by both Romans and non-Romans occurring in many different parts of the empire. Due to lack of sources and considerable ambiguity with regard to territory and succession, this period is quite complicated for historians to navigate compared to the Augustan age, the era of the five-good emperors, or the tetrarchy and later 1 Allen, Brent, A Political History of Early Christianity (London: T & T Clark, 2009), 263. 4 emperors. However, these four rulers, while mysterious and perhaps less significant in the overall scope of Roman imperial history, were crucially significant when examined through the lens of Christianity. Each had his own unique perspective on the religion, and their consequent actions would indirectly cause Christianity to prosper in this time. My overall argument in this thesis is that the imperial polices of each of these emperors enabled Christianity to spread and to become structurally unified during this period. These emperors’ policies were heavily influenced by two different factors. First, a decentralized, unregulated religious situation throughout the empire prevailed at the beginning of this period2; hundreds of religions, including Christianity, were free to exist throughout the empire without much fear of persecution. Second, this was a period of economic and militaristic upheaval. These emperors implemented persecutions or policies of toleration because they believed that action or inaction towards the Christians could pacify the empire along the borders and secure a more stable reign for themselves. Thus, while this was the darkest period for the Roman Empire before its eventual fall with regard to land, wealth, and political stability, this upheaval would end up being a blessing in disguise for the Christians. I will attempt to provide evidence for this claim by examining the four emperors’ reigns in turn, followed by a conclusion. In the first chapter, I will discuss the various sources that form the basis of my analysis and offer an analysis of the historiography itself. This is especially important because the sources for this particular period of Roman history are scant, incomplete, biased, and in some cases contradictory; additionally, most were written significantly later than the events they describe. While these factors pose obvious obstacles for the historian, the conflicting nature of these 2 J.B. Rives, Religion and Authority in Roman Carthage from Augustus and Constantine (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 113. 5 sources actually provides for some interesting analysis allowing scholars to view these emperors from multiple perspectives. In the second part of the first section, I will explain in more detail the de-centralized environment of religion that existed in the empire before the barracks period. In order to fully understand the policies of the four emperors and their effects on Christianity, it is important to understand the kind of religious model that had permeated the empire up until their time. The second chapter will focus on Philip the Arab. Philip, who ruled from 244- to 249 A.D., was known to be tolerant of the Christians, but some historians suggest he was himself actually a full Christian. The source for this belief is Eusebius of Caesarea, who claimed that at one point during his rule, Philip attended Easter Mass and repented of his sins.3 However, during Rome’s 1000th anniversary celebration, which occurred in 247 A.D., Philip was said to have held lavish pagan games.4 I will analyze Philip’s motivations for being either a Christian, or a dual Christian and pagan, how his unique beliefs reflect a continuation of the decentralized religious model, and how those beliefs may have provoked the hostility of his successor, Emperor Decius, towards Christianity. The third chapter will focus on the reign of Decius. Decius, who ruled from 249 to 251 A.D., is known as the first emperor to conduct systematic, empire-wide persecutions of the Christians. He achieved this through his edicts forcing all Roman citizens to carry around libelli, or documents which pledged that they would sacrifice to the pagan Gods.5 I will analyze Decius’ motivations for his edicts. Here the decentralized religious environment is especially important 3 Eusebius, and Paul L. Maier, Eusebius--The Church History: A New Translation with Commentary. (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1999), 231. 4 Zosimus, James. J, Buchanan, and Harold T., Davis, Zosimus: Historia Nova; The Decline of Rome (San Antonio: Trinity University Press, 1999), 15-16. 5 Brent, Early Christianity, 258. 6 to understand because Decius wished to recentralize religion to create unity across the empire. While Decius did persecute Christians, it may not have been that he hated Christians but rather that he championed paganism. I will discuss why he ultimately failed in this goal of recentralizing religion, and how his policies actually strengthened Christianity by spearheading a movement led by Cyprian to unify the Christians under the authority of the bishop.6 I will also suggest that regardless of Decius’ impact on the church, the vitriolic reactions of post- Constantinian Christian commentators such as Eusebius and Orosius were overblown. The fourth section will focus on Valerian and Gallienus, father and son, who ruled from 253 to 260 A.D., and 253 to 268 A.D. respectively. Unlike Decius, who seemed concerned with simply unifying the empire under pagan worship, Valerian aimed his edicts directly at the church, even persecuting Christian nobles and political figures in Rome herself in a top-down attack on the religion in which he may have hoped to destroy it completely. However, when Valerian was abruptly captured by the Persians in 260 A.D., his son Gallienus quickly abolished his fathers’ laws and actually established a period of peace for Christians which lasted until the persecutions of the tetrarchy.7 I will analyze Valerian’s motivations for his edicts, to what extent he was successful, and why Gallienus all of a sudden abandoned his father’s policies and established toleration; I will also assess how that toleration allowed the Christians to further prosper before the later persecutions of the tetrarchy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian's “Great
    ABSTRACT RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy. (Under the direction of Prof. S. Thomas Parker) In the year 303, the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the other members of the Tetrarchy launched a series of persecutions against Christians that is remembered as the most severe, widespread, and systematic persecution in the Church’s history. Around that time, the Tetrarchy also issued a rescript to the Pronconsul of Africa ordering similar persecutory actions against a religious group known as the Manichaeans. At first glance, the Tetrarchy’s actions appear to be the result of tensions between traditional classical paganism and religious groups that were not part of that system. However, when the status of Jewish populations in the Empire is examined, it becomes apparent that the Tetrarchy only persecuted Christians and Manichaeans. This thesis explores the relationship between the Tetrarchy and each of these three minority groups as it attempts to understand the Tetrarchy’s policies towards minority religions. In doing so, this thesis will discuss the relationship between the Roman state and minority religious groups in the era just before the Empire’s formal conversion to Christianity. It is only around certain moments in the various religions’ relationships with the state that the Tetrarchs order violence. Consequently, I argue that violence towards minority religions was a means by which the Roman state policed boundaries around its conceptions of Roman identity. © Copyright 2016 Carl Ross Rice All Rights Reserved Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy by Carl Ross Rice A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2016 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ _______________________________ S.
    [Show full text]
  • Orosius' Histories: a Digital Intertextual Investigation Into The
    comprehensive and detailed manual exploration of all of Orosius’ references. Orosius’ Histories: A Digital “It would be burdensome to list all of the Vergilian Intertextual Investigation echoes [...]” (Coffin, 1936: 237) What Coffin describes as “burdensome” can be into the First Christian accomplished with machine assistance. To the best of History of Rome our knowledge, no existing study, traditional or computational, has quantified and analysed the reuse Greta Franzini habits of Orosius. [email protected] The Tesserae project, which specialises in allusion Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany detection, is the most similar to the research presented here (Coffee, 2013), with the difference that it does not yet contain the text of Orosius nor many of Marco Büchler its sources, and that the results are automatically [email protected] computed without user input. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany In contrast, our approach, TRACER (Büchler et al., 2017), offers complete control over the algorithmic process, giving the user the choice between being Introduction guided by the software and to intervene by adjusting The research described in these pages is made pos- search parameters. In this way, results are produced sible by openly available Classical texts and linguistic through a critical evaluation of the detection. resources. It aims at performing semi-automatic anal- Research Questions and Goal yses of Paulus Orosius’ (385-420 AD) most celebrated work, the Historia adversum Paganos Libri VII, against Our research began with the following questions: its sources. The Histories, as this work is known in Eng- how does Orosius adapt Classical authors? Can we lish, constitute the first history (752 BC to 417 AD) to categorise his text reuse styles and what is the optimal have been written from a Christian perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Domitian's Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome
    Rising from the Ashes: Domitian’s Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome Lea K. Cline In the August 1888 edition of the Notizie degli Scavi, profes- on a base of two steps; it is a long, solid rectangle, 6.25 m sors Guliermo Gatti and Rodolfo Lanciani announced the deep, 3.25 m wide, and 1.26 m high (lacking its crown). rediscovery of a Domitianic altar on the Quirinal hill during These dimensions make it the second largest public altar to the construction of the Casa Reale (Figures 1 and 2).1 This survive in the ancient capital. Built of travertine and revet- altar, found in situ on the southeast side of the Alta Semita ted in marble, this altar lacks sculptural decoration. Only its (an important northern thoroughfare) adjacent to the church inscription identifies it as an Ara Incendii Neroniani, an altar of San Andrea al Quirinale, was not unknown to scholars.2 erected in fulfillment of a vow made after the great fire of The site was discovered, but not excavated, in 1644 when Nero (A.D. 64).7 Pope Urban VIII (Maffeo Barberini) and Gianlorenzo Bernini Archaeological evidence attests to two other altars, laid the foundations of San Andrea al Quirinale; at that time, bearing identical inscriptions, excavated in the sixteenth the inscription was removed to the Vatican, and then the and seventeenth centuries; the Ara Incendii Neroniani found altar was essentially forgotten.3 Lanciani’s notes from May on the Quirinal was the last of the three to be discovered.8 22, 1889, describe a fairly intact structure—a travertine block Little is known of the two other altars; one, presumably altar with remnants of a marble base molding on two sides.4 found on the Vatican plain, was reportedly used as building Although the altar’s inscription was not in situ, Lanciani refers material for the basilica of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Domitian and the Vestals As Emperor and High Priest of Rome
    Domitian and the Vestals As emperor and high priest of Rome, Domitian involved himself with moral and religious matters. Unfortunately, at least one group paid the price for his religious zeal—the Vestal Virgins. During his reign Domitian convicted four priestesses of incestum (broken vows of chastity) along with numerous alleged male conspirators. Concentrated attacks on this priesthood had not happened since 114/113 BCE and a Vestal had not been condemned for many generations. Domitian’s first assault against the Vestal Virgins occurred shortly after his accession. The year of the trial is uncertain, but 81-82 BCE seems likely (Southern, Domitian, 79) although 83 BCE is also proposed (Bauman, Crime and Punishment in Ancient Rome, 93). On this occasion the Emperor found guilty three of the six priestesses, the Oculata sisters and Varronilla. Remarkably, Domitian did not rely on the traditional punishment of inhumation for Vestals convicted of incestum, but instead let them choose the manner of their deaths. Moreover, their lovers were merely exiled and not beaten to death which was the standard punishment for violating a Vestal Virgin. These events must be compared with the trial of the chief Vestal at the time, Cornelia. Although she was not part of the case mentioned above, we are told that Cornelia had been accused and acquitted of breaking her vows once before (Suetonius, Dom., 8). During her second trial in 91 BCE she was found guilty. However, this time Domitian reverted to the customary punishment and ordered that Cornelia be buried alive. Likewise, her alleged lovers were beaten to death with the exception of Valerius Licinianus who admitted his crime and was instead exiled.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gallic Empire (260-274): Rome Breaks Apart
    The Gallic Empire (260-274): Rome Breaks Apart Six Silver Coins Collection An empire fractures Roman chariots All coins in each set are protected in an archival capsule and beautifully displayed in a mahogany-like box. The box set is accompanied with a story card, certificate of authenticity, and a black gift box. By the middle of the third century, the Roman Empire began to show signs of collapse. A parade of emperors took the throne, mostly from the ranks of the military. Years of civil war and open revolt led to an erosion of territory. In the year 260, in a battle on the Eastern front, the emperor Valerian was taken prisoner by the hated Persians. He died in captivity, and his corpse was stuffed and hung on the wall of the palace of the Persian king. Valerian’s capture threw the already-fractured empire into complete disarray. His son and co-emperor, Gallienus, was unable to quell the unrest. Charismatic generals sought to consolidate their own power, but none was as powerful, or as ambitious, as Postumus. Born in an outpost of the Empire, of common stock, Postumus rose swiftly through the ranks, eventually commanding Roman forces “among the Celts”—a territory that included modern-day France, Belgium, Holland, and England. In the aftermath of Valerian’s abduction in 260, his soldiers proclaimed Postumus emperor. Thus was born the so-called Gallic Empire. After nine years of relative peace and prosperity, Postumus was murdered by his own troops, and the Gallic Empire, which had depended on the force of his personality, began to crumble.
    [Show full text]
  • 11Ffi ELOGIA of the AUGUSTAN FORUM
    THEELOGIA OF THE AUGUSTAN FORUM 11ffi ELOGIA OF THE AUGUSTAN FORUM By BRAD JOHNSON, BA A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Brad Johnson, August 2001 MASTER OF ARTS (2001) McMaster University (Classics) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Elogia of the Augustan Forum AUTHOR: Brad Johnson, B.A. (McMaster University), B.A. Honours (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Claude Eilers NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 122 II ABSTRACT The Augustan Forum contained the statues offamous leaders from Rome's past. Beneath each statue an inscription was appended. Many of these inscriptions, known also as elogia, have survived. They record the name, magistracies held, and a brief account of the achievements of the individual. The reasons why these inscriptions were included in the Forum is the focus of this thesis. This thesis argues, through a detailed analysis of the elogia, that Augustus employed the inscriptions to propagate an image of himself as the most distinguished, and successful, leader in the history of Rome. III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Claude Eilers, for not only suggesting this topic, but also for his patience, constructive criticism, sense of humour, and infinite knowledge of all things Roman. Many thanks to the members of my committee, Dr. Evan Haley and Dr. Peter Kingston, who made time in their busy schedules to be part of this process. To my parents, lowe a debt that is beyond payment. Their support, love, and encouragement throughout the years is beyond description.
    [Show full text]
  • Document 1 Disease Takes Its Toll on the Roman Empire
    Grade 6 The Eastern Hemisphere Unit 5 The Mediterranean World Lesson 1 You Decide What Factors Led to the “Fall” of the Roman Empire DOCUMENT 1 DISEASE TAKES ITS TOLL ON THE ROMAN EMPIRE Although many disastrous epidemics probably occurred throughout [early history], few sources detailing … early plagues have survived. Unfortunately, few accounts exist; and because of this, we don’t know exactly how or where these epidemics originated…. One such disease, known as the Antonine plague, occurred during the reign of Marcus Aurelius (161-180 CE). It was brought back by soldiers returning from Seleucia (an ancient Greek city on the Mediterranean coast of Pamphylia, in Anatolia, Turkey) and before it abated (was brought under control), it had affected Asia Minor, Egypt, Greece, and Italy. The plague destroyed as much as one-third of the population in some areas, and decimated (destroyed) the Roman army. In 180 CE, Marcus Aurelius caught some type of infection and died in his army camp. There has been some speculation (guessing) that this infection was the plague. Another plague occurred during the reigns of Decius (249-251 CE) and Gallus (251-253 CE). This pestilence (epidemic) broke out in Egypt in 251 CE, and from there, infected the entire empire. Its mortality rate severely depleted the ranks of the army, and caused massive labor shortages. The plague was still raging in 270 CE, when it caused the death of the emperor Claudius Gothicus (268-270 CE). Adapted from http://www.loyno.edu/~history/journal/1996-7/Smith.html 1. What impact did the outbreak of plagues have on the Roman population? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Army in the Third Century Ad Lukas De Blois My Issue In
    INTEGRATION OR DISINTEGRATION? THE ROMAN ARMY IN THE THIRD CENTURY A.D. Lukas de Blois My issue in this paper is: what was the main trend within the Roman military forces in the third century ad? Integration, or disintegration into regional entities? This paper is not about cultural integration of ethnic groups in multicultural parts of the Roman Empire, such as the city of Rome, thriving commercial centres, and border regions to which the armies had brought people from various parts of the Empire, and where multicultural military personnel lived together with indigenous groups, craftsmen from different origins, and immigrants from commercially active regions, either in canabae adjacent to castra stativa, or in garrison towns, as in the Eastern parts of the Empire. In variatio upon an issue raised by Frederick Naerebout in another paper published in this volume, I might ask myself in what sense an army, which in the third century ad was progressively composed of ethnically and culturally different units, kept functioning as an integrated entity, or in actual practice disintegrated into rivalling, particularistic regional forces whose actual or potential competition for money and supplies con- stantly threatened peace and stability in the Empire, particularly in times of dangerous external wars, when the need for supplies increased. The discussion should start with Septimius Severus. After his victories over Pescennius Niger, some tribes in northern Mesopotamia, and Albinus in Gaul, Severus had to replenish the ranks of his armies, for example at the Danube frontiers, which had yielded many men to Severus’ field armies and his new praetorian guard.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Review Text Structure!
    Grade 6 Day 18 ELA q I Grade 6 Day 18 ELA Grade 6 Day 18 ELA W o Grade 6 Bearcat Day 18 Math pl Grade 6 Bearcat Day 18 Math P2 Grade 6 Bearcat Day 18 Math 173 Grade 6 Bearcat Day 18 Math 104 Grade 6 Day 18 Science pl Grade 6 Day 18 Science P2 Grade 6 Day 18 Science 123 Question for you to turn in. Describe how processes were used to form a landform. Use vocabulary and evidence from the passage to support your answer. RACE. Grade 6 Day 18 Social Studies Grade 6 Day 18 Social Studies to . I ] l n n t t e o o r n n m i i i t r r t t a a p t t h e e a a . r r m h h 1 o o m m t t E r r 0 p p O O e o o n s f f m m r n a i i i l n n o i i r m e e o m p i R t / l m ? ? d d e l l a l l E e e h a a , ci s s T f f s e u u n n n a a m o sp w w o i C C r o o s/ f t t ct t n D D a a e n a s h h s s e i i t m e W W h h n o h r t / co s o t e d r i n n s s p o a i e e e e t i i m s v v n e p r r m m / e i l t e e e e g t c r s s n n a e e o o l E E R R e s.
    [Show full text]
  • Vespasian's Apotheosis
    VESPASIAN’S APOTHEOSIS Andrew B. Gallia* In the study of the divinization of Roman emperors, a great deal depends upon the sequence of events. According to the model of consecratio proposed by Bickermann, apotheosis was supposed to be accomplished during the deceased emperor’s public funeral, after which the senate acknowledged what had transpired by decreeing appropriate honours for the new divus.1 Contradictory evidence has turned up in the Fasti Ostienses, however, which seem to indicate that both Marciana and Faustina were declared divae before their funerals took place.2 This suggests a shift * Published in The Classical Quarterly 69.1 (2019). 1 E. Bickermann, ‘Die römische Kaiserapotheosie’, in A. Wlosok (ed.), Römischer Kaiserkult (Darmstadt, 1978), 82-121, at 100-106 (= Archiv für ReligionswissenschaftW 27 [1929], 1-31, at 15-19); id., ‘Consecratio’, in W. den Boer (ed.), Le culte des souverains dans l’empire romain. Entretiens Hardt 19 (Geneva, 1973), 1-37, at 13-25. 2 L. Vidman, Fasti Ostienses (Prague, 19822), 48 J 39-43: IIII k. Septembr. | [Marciana Aug]usta excessit divaq(ue) cognominata. | [Eodem die Mati]dia Augusta cognominata. III | [non. Sept. Marc]iana Augusta funere censorio | [elata est.], 49 O 11-14: X[— k. Nov. Fausti]na Aug[usta excessit eodemq(ue) die a] | senatu diva app[ellata et s(enatus) c(onsultum) fact]um fun[ere censorio eam efferendam.] | Ludi et circenses [delati sunt. — i]dus N[ov. Faustina Augusta funere] | censorio elata e[st]. Against this interpretation of the Marciana fragment (as published by A. Degrassi, Inscr. It. 13.1 [1947], 201) see E.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Roman Empire
    EDITIONLAUSANNE Limited to one tbousand registered sets N0.4'7 THE DECLINEAND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE VOL. I1 THE HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE BY EDWARD GIBBON EDITED BY J. B. BURY, M.A. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY THE RT. HON. W. E. H. LECKY VOL. I1 NEW YORK FRED DE FAU & COMPANY PUBLISHERS COPYRIGHT,I+, FRED DE FAU & COMPANY. CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME PACE... LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS......... xu1 CHAPTER X The Emperors Decks. Gallus. Amilianus. Valerian. and Galliersur - The General Irruption of the Barbarians - The Thirty Tyrads A.D. 248-268 The Nature of the Subject .......i The Emperor Philip .........a 249 Services.Revolt. Victory. and Reign of the Emperor Decius . a 250 He marchesagainst the Goths ......3 Origin of the Goths from Scandinavia .....4 Religion of the Goths ........5 Institutions and Death of Odin .......6 Agreeable. but uncertainHypothesis concerning Odin . 6 Emigration of the Goths fromScandinavia into Prussia . 7 -from Prussia to theUkraine ...... 8 The Gothic Nation increases in its March .... 9 Distinction of the Germans and Sarmatians ....10 Description ofUkraine the ......10 The Goths invade the Roman Provinces .....11 250 Various Events of the Gothic War ... ..12 251 Decius revives the ofice of Censor in the Person of Valerian . 14 The Design Impracticable. and without Effect ....15 Defeat and Death of Decius and his Son .....16 251 Election of Gallus .........IS 252 Retreat of the Goths ....... 18 gallus purchases Peace by the Payment of an annual Tnbut; 18 Popular Discontent .........19 253 Victory and Revolt of Ahilianus ......20 Gallus abandoned and slain .......20 Valerian revenges the Death of Gallus .....21 Is acknowledged Emperor ........21 'i Character of Valerian ....
    [Show full text]