DOCSLIB.ORG

Mark Twain National Forest Statement September 2005 to Accompany the 2005 Land and Resource Management Plan (2005 Forest Plan)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mark Twain National Forest Statement September 2005 to Accompany the 2005 Land and Resource Management Plan (2005 Forest Plan) Final United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Forest Service Impact Mark Twain National Forest Statement September 2005 To accompany the 2005 Land and Resource Management Plan (2005 Forest Plan) Mark Twain National Forest Abstract This final environmental impact statement (FEIS) documents analysis of ten alternatives developed for programmatic management of the 1.5 million acres administered by the Mark Twain National Forest. Alternatives 1-5 were analyzed in detail in the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS). Alternative 3 was the Preferred Alternative in the DEIS and was the foundation for the Proposed Forest Plan. Alternative 3 was modified slightly to address comments on the DEIS. This FEIS documents analysis of all alternatives and displays environmental effects at a programmatic level. Alternative 3 is referenced as the “Selected Alternative” in both the FEIS and the Record of Decision that accompanies this FEIS. The Selected Alternative, outlined as the Mark Twain National Forest 2005 Land and Resource Management Plan (2005 Forest Plan), guides all natural resource management activities on the Forest; addresses new information and concerns raised since the 1986 Plan was published; and meets objectives of federal laws, regulation, and policies. Rationale for choosing the modified Alternative 3 as the Selected Alternative is described in the Record of Decision for this FEIS. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Blossom Rock, Lane Spring Recreation Area Photographer: Nancy Feakes, Mark Twain National Forest Final EnvironmentalForest Plan Impact Statement To accompany the 2005 Land and Resource Management Plan (2005 Forest Plan) Barry, Bollinger, Boone, Butler, Callaway, Carter, Christian, Crawford, Dent, Douglas, Howell, Iron, Laclede, Madison, Oregon, Ozark, Phelps, Pulaski, Reynolds, Ripley, Saint Francois, Sainte Genevieve, Shannon, Stone, Taney, Texas, Washington, Wayne, and Wright Counties, Missouri. Eastern Region Milwaukee, Wisconsin September 2005 Responsible Agency: USDA Forest Service Cooperating Agency: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service Responsible Official: Randy Moore Eastern Region Office 626 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 Information Contact: Mark Twain National Forest Supervisor’s Office 401 Fairgrounds Road Rolla, MO 65401 573/364-4621 Mark Twain National Forest Contents—Final Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents Summary Introduction .......................................................................................................................................S-1 Forest Profile.................................................................................................................................S-2 Summary of Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) .......................................................S-3 Proposed Action............................................................................................................................S-3 Purpose and Need for Forest Plan Revision..................................................................................S-3 Revision Topics ............................................................................................................................S-3 Forest Plan Revision Issues ..........................................................................................................S-5 Resources with No Change in Management Direction.................................................................S-6 Alternative Development..............................................................................................................S-7 Changes between the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements....................................S-7 Alternatives Considered in Detail.................................................................................................S-9 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study....................................................S-10 Effects of the Alternatives ..........................................................................................................S-11 Comparison of Alternatives ........................................................................................................S-17 Chapter 1—Purpose, Need, and Forest Plan Revision Issues Introduction .......................................................................................................................................1-1 Proposed Action.................................................................................................................................1-1 Decisions Made in the Forest Plan ...................................................................................................1-2 Responsible Official...........................................................................................................................1-2 Purpose and Need for Forest Plan Revision....................................................................................1-2 Need for Change in Management Direction .................................................................................1-3 Other Changes ...................................................................................................................................1-9 Public Involvement..........................................................................................................................1-10 Forest Plan Revision Issues.............................................................................................................1-10 Issue 1 –Timber Supply ..............................................................................................................1-11 Issue 2 – Ecological Sustainability and Ecosystem Health.........................................................1-11 Issue 3 – Wildlife Habitat Management .....................................................................................1-12 Issue 4 – Fire Management.........................................................................................................1-13 Issue 5 – Economic Sustainability of Local Communities .........................................................1-14 Resources with No Change in Management Direction.................................................................1-15 Chapter 2—The Alternatives Introduction .......................................................................................................................................2-1 Development of Alternatives ............................................................................................................2-1 Changes between the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements..................................2-2 Management Prescription 1.1 and 1.2...........................................................................................2-3 Management Prescription 2.1 .......................................................................................................2-3 Threatened and Endangered Species.............................................................................................2-3 Wildlife Habitat ............................................................................................................................2-3 Lower Rock Creek Area ...............................................................................................................2-4 Temporary Openings ....................................................................................................................2-4 Monitoring and Evaluation ...........................................................................................................2-4 Editorial Corrections.....................................................................................................................2-5 Contents - i Mark Twain National Forest—Final Environmental Impact Statement Description of the Alternatives.........................................................................................................2-5 Elements shared by all alternatives...............................................................................................2-5 Elements shared by Alternatives 1 through 4 ...............................................................................2-5 Elements that vary by Alternative.................................................................................................2-8 How alternatives are described .....................................................................................................2-8 Alternatives Considered in Detail ....................................................................................................2-9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • TAUM SAUK AREA THREATENED by HYDRO PLANT by Susan Flader
    (This article was first published in Heritage, the Newsletter of the Missouri Parks Association, August 2001) TAUM SAUK AREA THREATENED BY HYDRO PLANT by Susan Flader When state park officials selected a cover photo to illustrate their first-ever assessment of "threats to the parks" nearly a decade ago, they chose not a scene of despoliation but a symbolic representation of the best of what they were seeking to protect. It was a vista at the core of the Ozarks, looking from the state's grandest waterfall near its tallest peak across its deepest valley into the heart of Taum Sauk Mountain State Park, Missouri's then-newest public park but also its geologically oldest, wildest, most intact, and most ecologically diverse landscape. Scarcely could one imagine that the very symbol of what they were seeking to protect through their threats study, titled "Challenge of the '90s," would itself become the most seriously threatened landscape in Missouri at the dawn of the new millennium. The photo showed two forest-blanketed, time-gentled igneous knobs in the heart of the St. Francois Mountains, on the left Smoke Hill, recently acquired by the state, and on the right Church Mountain, leased to the Department of Natural Resources for park trail development by Union Electric Company of St. Louis (now AmerenUE). But on June 8, the Ameren Development Company, a subsidiary of Ameren Corporation, filed an application for a preliminary permit with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Church Mountain Pumped Storage Project. It would consist of a 130-acre reservoir ringed by a 12,350-foot-long, 90-foot-high dam on the top of Church Mountain, a lower reservoir of 400 acres formed by a 1,900-foot-long, 100-foot high dam flooding several miles of Taum Sauk Creek, which has been designated a State Outstanding Resource Water, and associated tunnels, powerhouse, transmission lines, roads, and related facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing on the Eleven Point River
    FISHING ON THE ELEVEN POINT RIVER Fishing the Eleven Point National Scenic River is a very popular recreation activity on the Mark Twain National Forest. The river sees a variety of users and is shared by canoes and boats, swimmers, trappers, and anglers. Please use caution and courtesy when encountering another user. Be aware that 25 horsepower is the maximum boat motor size allowed on the Eleven Point River from Thomasville to "the Narrows" at Missouri State Highway 142. Several sections of the river are surrounded by private land. Before walking on the bank, ask the landowners for permission. Many anglers today enjoy the sport of the catch and fight, but release the fish un-harmed. Others enjoy the taste of freshly caught fish. Whatever your age, skill level or desire, you should be aware of fishing rules and regulations, and a little natural history of your game. The Varied Waters The Eleven Point River, because of its variety of water sources, offers fishing for both cold and warm-water fish. Those fishing the waters of the Eleven Point tend to divide the river into three distinctive areas. Different fish live in different parts of the river depending upon the water temperature and available habitat. The upper river, from Thomasville to the Greer Spring Branch, is good for smallmouth bass, longear sunfish, bluegill, goggle-eye (rock bass), suckers, and a few largemouth bass. This area of the river is warmer and its flow decreases during the summer. The river and fish communities change where Greer Spring Branch enters the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 325: General Relativity Spring 2019 Problem Set 2
    Physics 325: General Relativity Spring 2019 Problem Set 2 Due: Fri 8 Feb 2019. Reading: Please skim Chapter 3 in Hartle. Much of this should be review, but probably not all of it|be sure to read Box 3.2 on Mach's principle. Then start on Chapter 6. Problems: 1. Spacetime interval. Hartle Problem 4.13. 2. Four-vectors. Hartle Problem 5.1. 3. Lorentz transformations and hyperbolic geometry. In class, we saw that a Lorentz α0 α β transformation in 2D can be written as a = L β(#)a , that is, 0 ! ! ! a0 cosh # − sinh # a0 = ; (1) a10 − sinh # cosh # a1 where a is spacetime vector. Here, the rapidity # is given by tanh # = β; cosh # = γ; sinh # = γβ; (2) where v = βc is the velocity of frame S0 relative to frame S. (a) Show that two successive Lorentz boosts of rapidity #1 and #2 are equivalent to a single α γ α Lorentz boost of rapidity #1 +#2. In other words, check that L γ(#1)L(#2) β = L β(#1 +#2), α where L β(#) is the matrix in Eq. (1). You will need the following hyperbolic trigonometry identities: cosh(#1 + #2) = cosh #1 cosh #2 + sinh #1 sinh #2; (3) sinh(#1 + #2) = sinh #1 cosh #2 + cosh #1 sinh #2: (b) From Eq. (3), deduce the formula for tanh(#1 + #2) in terms of tanh #1 and tanh #2. For the appropriate choice of #1 and #2, use this formula to derive the special relativistic velocity tranformation rule V − v V 0 = : (4) 1 − vV=c2 Physics 325, Spring 2019: Problem Set 2 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Guide 75+ Things to See and Do
    Activity Guide 75+ Things to See and Do in and around Pocahontas and Randolph County Arkansas ! USA Experience The Lesmeister, a well- appointed retreat offering a restful escape from your busy life, or an active time spent seeing and doing in a classic American hill town. The choice is yours! • For ambiance, each living area has either a wood-burning stove or gas fireplace. • Bedrooms feature king size beds with high-thread count sheets • Enjoy private bathrooms with heated floors, ultra-clean Sanijet spa tubs, a shower, flat screen TV, towel warmer, toilet with heated seat/Bidet with warmed water, and a skylight to let the natural light come in. Make Secure Online Reservations 24/7 at ArkansasGuestHouse.com 208 N Marr Street, Pocahontas, Arkansas 501-291-1233 The perfect base for a visit to historic Pocahontas! Activity Guide Copyright © 2012-17 by ARSoft LLC. All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Things to See & Do in Downtown Pocahontas Historic District Walking Tour. 7 NoMa Art and Entertainment District. 7 Downtown Playhouse.. 7 Bella Piazza Italian Restaurant. 8 Carroll’s Variety Store and Flea Market.. 8 1872 Randolph County Courthouse.. 9 Capture of Confederate General Jeff Thompson. 9 Arkansas’ Only Quilt Trail. 10 Studio B Salon and Day Spa. 11 Black River Beads, Pottery, and Glass Blowing. 11 Randolph County Heritage Museum. 11 The Treasure Trunk Eclectic Shopping. 12 Black River Overlook Park, Lover’s Lock Lane, and The Pocahontas Civil War River Walk Memorial. 12 Futrell’s Old Time Hardware. 14 R. J. Reynolds-Pearcy Art Gallery. 14 Arkansas’ Oldest Barber Shop.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • R1090) Cullimore Family
    Information Sheet R Cullimore family. 1090 Collection, 1973-1992. Four folders. This collection is available at The State Historical Society of Missouri. If you would like more information, please contact us at [email protected]. These are papers of the Cullimore family of journalists and outdoor writers. The collection consists of correspondence between Donald B. “Rocky” Cullimore and Dan Saults, and a compi- lation of Saults’s articles in Branson and Springfield, Missouri, newspapers. This collection represents the first installment of what will be a much larger assemblage of Cullimore family papers. It centers on conservationist and author Dan Saults, a close friend of the Cullimore family, and supplements materials in the Saults collection (WHMC-Rolla R403). Saults was a leader in promoting conservation efforts in Missouri. A native of Knob Noster, Mis- souri, he bought the Knob Noster Weekly Gem after graduating from the University of Missouri School of Journalism. He operated the paper until World War Two. Saults served as an officer in the 339th Infantry Regiment in North Africa and Italy during the war, after which he spent a year in Texas. In 1947, Saults joined the Missouri Department of Conservation, heading the depart- ment’s information service and editing the Missouri Conservationist. Later he became the deputy director of the department. In 1964, Saults joined the U. S. Department of the Interior and moved to Washington, D.C., where he worked with the Bureau of Land Management and the Fish and Wildlife Service. He retired in 1973. Saults and his wife, Helen, a former National Park Service employee, moved to a home near Branson, Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIVE REALITY a Thesis
    RELATIVE REALITY _______________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts & Sciences of Ohio University _______________ In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science ________________ Gary W. Steinberg June 2002 © 2002 Gary W. Steinberg All Rights Reserved This thesis entitled RELATIVE REALITY BY GARY W. STEINBERG has been approved for the Department of Physics and Astronomy and the College of Arts & Sciences by David Onley Emeritus Professor of Physics and Astronomy Leslie Flemming Dean, College of Arts & Sciences STEINBERG, GARY W. M.S. June 2002. Physics Relative Reality (41pp.) Director of Thesis: David Onley The consequences of Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity are explored in an imaginary world where the speed of light is only 10 m/s. Emphasis is placed on phenomena experienced by a solitary observer: the aberration of light, the Doppler effect, the alteration of the perceived power of incoming light, and the perception of time. Modified ray-tracing software and other visualization tools are employed to create a video that brings this imaginary world to life. The process of creating the video is detailed, including an annotated copy of the final script. Some of the less explored aspects of relativistic travel—discovered in the process of generating the video—are discussed, such as the perception of going backwards when actually accelerating from rest along the forward direction. Approved: David Onley Emeritus Professor of Physics & Astronomy 5 Table of Contents ABSTRACT........................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Electrodynamics with Minkowski Spacetime Algebra
    Relativistic Electrodynamics with Minkowski Spacetime Algebra Walid Karam Azzubaidi nº 52174 Mestrado Integrado em Eng. Electrotécnica e de Computadores, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal. e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The aim of this work is to study several electrodynamic effects using spacetime algebra – the geometric algebra of spacetime, which is supported on Minkowski spacetime. The motivation for submitting onto this investigation relies on the need to explore new formalisms which allow attaining simpler derivations with rational results. The practical applications for the examined themes are uncountable and diverse, such as GPS devices, Doppler ultra-sound, color space conversion, aerospace industry etc. The effects which will be analyzed include time dilation, space contraction, relativistic velocity addition for collinear vectors, Doppler shift, moving media and vacuum form reduction, Lorentz force, energy-momentum operator and finally the twins paradox with Doppler shift. The difference between active and passive Lorentz transformation is also established. The first regards a vector transformation from one frame to another, while the passive transformation is related to user interpretation, therefore considered passive interpretation, since two observers watch the same event with a different point of view. Regarding time dilation and length contraction in the theory of special relativity, one concludes that those parameters (time and length) are relativistic dimensions, since their
    [Show full text]
  • Voigt Transformations in Retrospect: Missed Opportunities?
    Voigt transformations in retrospect: missed opportunities? Olga Chashchina Ecole´ Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France∗ Natalya Dudisheva Novosibirsk State University, 630 090, Novosibirsk, Russia† Zurab K. Silagadze Novosibirsk State University and Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630 090, Novosibirsk, Russia.‡ The teaching of modern physics often uses the history of physics as a didactic tool. However, as in this process the history of physics is not something studied but used, there is a danger that the history itself will be distorted in, as Butterfield calls it, a “Whiggish” way, when the present becomes the measure of the past. It is not surprising that reading today a paper written more than a hundred years ago, we can extract much more of it than was actually thought or dreamed by the author himself. We demonstrate this Whiggish approach on the example of Woldemar Voigt’s 1887 paper. From the modern perspective, it may appear that this paper opens a way to both the special relativity and to its anisotropic Finslerian generalization which came into the focus only recently, in relation with the Cohen and Glashow’s very special relativity proposal. With a little imagination, one can connect Voigt’s paper to the notorious Einstein-Poincar´epri- ority dispute, which we believe is a Whiggish late time artifact. We use the related historical circumstances to give a broader view on special relativity, than it is usually anticipated. PACS numbers: 03.30.+p; 1.65.+g Keywords: Special relativity, Very special relativity, Voigt transformations, Einstein-Poincar´epriority dispute I. INTRODUCTION Sometimes Woldemar Voigt, a German physicist, is considered as “Relativity’s forgotten figure” [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 24 Issue 2 April 2010 Rediscovering Caves on the Irish
    The The Kansas City Area Grotto Volume 24 Issue 2 Guano April 2010 Rediscovering Caves on the Irish Wilderness Biology Project Work at Carroll Cave Photography project at Ennis Cave Table of Contents Events The Irish Wilderness May 12 ­ October 2007 KCAG monthly meeting - 7:00pm at the Part two. Feature article by Jim Cooley. Photos by Arthur Mag Conference Center on the Jim Cooley, Craig Hines, Marcello Kramer and DJ campus of Midwest Research Institute. Corner of Cherry and Volker in Kansas Hall. City, Missouri. Page 4 May 15-16 Carroll Cave biology students ­ April 2009 Missouri Speleological Survey meeting. Rolla, Missouri. Project caving (survey) Trip report by Bill Gee. Photos by Dr. David Ashley on the Paddy Creek Wilderness on the and Bill Gee. 15th. The meeting is on the 16th. Page 18 May 16 Missouri Caves and Karst Conservancy Carroll Cave biology project ­ July 2009 (MCKC) meeting. Rolla, Missouri. Trip report and photos by Bill Gee. May 15-20 Page 21 National Cave Rescue Commission week- long seminar. Mentone, Alabama. Ennis Cave photography http://www.caves.org/ncrc/national/2010 ­ March 11­16, 2010 Seminar/seminar2010.htm for Trip report and photos by Rick Hines information and registration. Page 24 May 22 KCAG Cliff Day at Truman Lake. Practice your vertical skills. May 26 to June 2 25th annual Ennis Cave Blowout. http://www.enniscave.org for information. June 5 Annual KCAG summer picnic. Details will be sent to the grotto email list. August 2-6 National Speleological Society annual convention. Essex, Vermont. http://www.nss2010.com/default.php for information and registration.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Conservationist July 2021
    VOLUME 82, ISSUE 7, JULY 2021 MISSOURI SERVING NATURE & YOU CONSERVATIONIST VIEWING W ILDLIFE HUNTING CAMPING LOUNGING RUNNING & HIKING BIKING ARCHERY & SHOO TING STARGAZING FISHING SWIMMING mdc.mo.gov/NeverLoseTouch For ways to reconnect with nature, visit visit nature, with reconnect to ways For . Never Lose Touch Lose Never . and again, It’s time to make that connection connection that make to time It’s nature and exploring Missouri. exploring and nature to give back while being out in in out being while back give to nature. There are so many ways ways many so are There nature. VIEWING W ILDLIFE HUNTING CAMPING LOUNGING RUNNING & HIKING to helping people connect with with connect people helping to up streams and planting trees trees planting and streams up efforts in Missouri, from cleaning cleaning from Missouri, in efforts huge impact on conservation conservation on impact huge it thriving. Volunteers make a a make Volunteers thriving. it needs to be cared for to keep keep to for cared be to needs Nature is amazing. It also also It amazing. is Nature with nature? with time you connected connected you time When was the last last the was When BIKING ARCHERY & SHOO TING STARGAZING FISHING SWIMMING MISSOURI CONSERVATIONIST JULY 2021 Contents VOLUME 82, ISSUE 7 10 ON THE COVER Bushwhacker Lake Conservation Area : DAVID STONNER 16–35mm lens, f/11 1/15 sec, ISO 100 GOVERNOR Michael L. Parson THE CONSERVATION COMMISSION CHAIR Don C. Bedell VICE CHAIR Wm. L. (Barry) Orscheln SECRETARY Mark L. McHenry MEMBER Steven D. Harrison DIRECTOR Sara
    [Show full text]