DOCSLIB.ORG

Darwin and Historical Linguistics Such Imagery Was Benefcial for the Theory of Nat‐ the Theory of Evolution As Expounded by Ural Selection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Darwin and Historical Linguistics Such Imagery Was Benefcial for the Theory of Nat‐ the Theory of Evolution As Expounded by Ural Selection Stephen G. Alter. Darwinism and the Linguistic Image: Language, Race and Natural Theology in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. xii + 193 pp. $39.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8018-5882-6. Reviewed by Johann W. Tempelhoff Published on H-Ideas (January, 2001) Darwin and Historical Linguistics Such imagery was beneficial for the theory of nat‐ The theory of evolution as expounded by ural selection. Scholars are well aware of the im‐ Charles Darwin has been one of the most persis‐ pact of evolutionary theory on contemporary bio‐ tent themes for debate amongst scientists in the logical science. Alter claims this theory had an humanities and the natural sciences since the even greater impact on the study of linguistics. In nineteenth century. It is an all-embracing theory short, fundamental change was the order of the and tends to ft in effortlessly (and with consider‐ day in scientific thinking across a broad spectrum able controversy), with numerous perceptions of of disciplines. Alter's study in particular deals the self, society and science. Understandably the with Darwin's intellectual influence on contempo‐ major themes up for discussion have been the rary scientists and language scholars. Moreover, it compati- bility between natural history theory of deals with the intellectual investment the genera‐ humankind and certain moral tenets subscribed tion of the 1860's made in the image of evolution to by people of strong religious convictions. In the and the debates it generated (p. xi). natural sciences numerous investigations have Alter identifies fve stages of development. added new perspectives to our understanding of First, he considers linguistics in Europe prior to Darwinism. In the humanities the need for similar the period of Darwin. He then goes on to look at investigations have been of a somewhat more in‐ similar fgures (of speech/language) appearing in hibited nature. the works of Darwin's contemporaries. The third In his work, Darwin and the Linguistic Image: phase deals with the subtle form of polemic in Language, Race and Natural Theology in the Nine‐ which authors were involved when they dealt teenth Century, Stephen G. Alter explains from the with evolutionary theory, primarily from a lin‐ perspective of historical linguistics how Darwinist guistic perspective. Alter then describes the re‐ theory thrived on the contemporary culture of im‐ sponse the debate had on Darwin in his subse‐ agery in nineteenth-century scientific thought. quent publications. In the fnal section the con‐ H-Net Reviews cept of genealogy is explored as an integrative would be somewhat different from most conven‐ idea in both the biological and human sciences in tional studies in the feld. As Alter states, "Certain‐ the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (pp. xi-xii). ly in Britain, at least, the philologist and the anti‐ The author, as a result of the comprehensive fo‐ quary were related from the start," (p. 2.), thus cus of the work and the disparate nature of inves‐ suggesting that the principles of historicism were tigation, is able to deal with these themes with a vital force in dealing with matters historical and varying degrees of success. linguistic. Moreover, Alter argues that geologists At the end of the eighteenth century the En‐ and paleontologists were also collaborating with lightenment had a marked effect on the reception antiquarians and philologists. of academic endeavors in scientific discourse. >From the outset Alter brings in a very partic‐ This was particularly the case in Germany. It was ular narrative. He introduces the concept of ge‐ an era when idealism and nomothetic scientific nealogy, "the new discipline that was built around investigation prevailed. The trend was usurped the idea of branching descent from a common an‐ later with the emergence of romanticism that dis‐ cestor" (p. 2). Genealogy might have been a new mantled, in an ideographic manner, much of the approach in the natural sciences. It was, however, certainty with which scholars had formulated an old discipline in terms of historical studies. In "laws" operating in a compatible fashion between fact, it was a condensed and symbolic form of im‐ the human and the natural sciences. The sense of age transmission with the objective of introducing certainty and confidence of natural science was a hidden and almost invisible narrative discourse called into question by theories of language. The to secure the political hegemony of most monar‐ discipline of Philology featured prominently in chies in post-Napoleonic Europe. It is interesting this context. Starting with Schleiermacher in the that this form of abstraction was absorbed into German tradition, language became one of the scientific thinking to account for the creation of a most dynamic felds of investigation for the study hierarchy of natural origins. Biologically it makes of cultural transformation and hermeneutical un‐ sense. The structured images interact smoothly derstanding. with the emergence of the idea of the national Alter explains that Philology "was the most state. It helps in seeking identities of race in eth‐ common English label for the linguistic feld as a nological investigation. It was also aimed at locat‐ whole throughout the nineteenth century." (p. xii) ing root languages. What he does not point out is that a whole scien‐ Alter argues in a convincing manner that tific movement of thought, especially in the hu‐ "Charles Darwin was not acting as an isolated manities, hinged on this approach. It was Dilthey thinker when he came up with analogies to illus‐ who would later make the major contribution to‐ trate his species theory. Rather, he participated in wards our comprehension of the humanities and a close-knit discursive world, whose shared theo‐ social sciences in respect of their relationship to retical concerns and rhetorical usages were al‐ the biological and natural sciences. The author's ready promoting a sense of philology's natural objective, however, is not to look at the evolution resonance with other scientific felds" (p. 14). It is of the humanities and the central role of philology not easy to come in an outright manner to this in nineteenth century Germany. Rather, he aims conclusion. As a result of the focus of the work at focusing on the Anglo- Saxon (also the Anglo- one of the primary problems was, according to American) linguistic environment that fourished the author, that a distinction had to be drawn be‐ at the time when Darwin was an influential tween the language-species analogy and specula‐ thinker. It thus stands to reason that his focus tion, at the time of the actual origin of language 2 H-Net Reviews (p. 3). Alter, however, aims to get to the essential in the United States, constructed substantial argu‐ elements of what he describes as "comparative ments in opposition to Darwin. These were con‐ philology", based on the groundbreaking re‐ sidered quixotic and consequently ridiculed by searches of Friedrich Schlegel, who himself was of those within the Darwinian circle. More substan‐ the opinion that there was a basis for comparison tial criticism came from F. Max Muller, who par‐ between the Indian language and wisdom. tially in response to The Origin of the Species_, Schlegel however preferred the terminology of a started research into the origins of speech. "comparative grammar" (p. 9.) The new trends in In the narrative leading up to the publication philology, particularly comparative philology as of Darwin's The Descent of Man(1871), Alter ex‐ practiced by Frans Bopp (1791-1867) and Jacob plains how evolutionary theory permeated Ger‐ Grimm 1785-1863), started seeping into Britain man science circles. August Schleicher, a leading from Germany in the 1830's. comparative linguist, and the young zoologist, An interesting history of ideas starts unfold‐ Ernst Haeckel (1834-1920), became the leading ing when Alter explains that it was Darwin's spokespersons for the theory in the German lan‐ cousin, Hensleigh Wedgwood (1803-91), an ety‐ guage. So convinced was Haeckel that he forced mologist for the frst New English Dictionary, who "Darwinismus" into regions of biological and first put the evolutionist on to philological theory. philosophical theorizing that Darwin himself tried Darwin found in linguistics indications of the to avoid (p. 73). Schleicher in turn would go on to gradual evolution of language as phenomenon. It draw up a genealogy of the Indo-European lan‐ opened up vistas much wider than merely the guages in his Die Darwinsche Theorie und die phenomenon of language. He was able to perceive Sprachwissenschaft (1863). In Britain the theolo‐ in the "tree of life" (a symbol of significance for gian and language scholar, F.W. Farrar genealogy), a symbol for the family tree of lan‐ (1831-1903), was tolerant towards the theory of guage (p. 20). Apart from the similarities between natural selection. It was he who would promote a related languages, Darwin also noted there were debate on the way in which language was analo‐ some dissimilarities, such as the English word gous to the evolutionary biological processes. In‐ "bishop," which in French was "evequ." Both were creasingly, moves were afoot to elevate the disci‐ derived from the Greek "episkopos" (p. 21). The pline of philology as one of the major felds of sci‐ cultural rootedness of language made it possible entific endeavor (also in the natural sciences) (p. for the idea of ethnicity and the sense of national 87). In this section of the work Alter comes up identity to permeate the evolutionary theoriza‐ with sound historical scholarship. By consulting tion of Darwin in the period leading up to the Darwin's original notes, texts and relevant con‐ publication of The Origin of the Species in 1859. temporary articles in journals he opens up to the Darwin's work had a profound impact on evo‐ reader Darwin's perceptions on language and lutionary thinking in many disciplines.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handling Word Formation in Comparative Linguistics
    Developing an annotation framework for word formation processes in comparative linguistics Nathanael E. Schweikhard, MPI-SHH, Jena Johann-Mattis List, MPI-SHH, Jena Word formation plays a central role in human language. Yet computational approaches to historical linguistics often pay little attention to it. This means that the detailed findings of classical historical linguistics are often only used in qualitative studies, yet not in quantitative studies. Based on human- and machine-readable formats suggested by the CLDF-initiative, we propose a framework for the annotation of cross-linguistic etymological relations that allows for the differentiation between etymologies that involve only regular sound change and those that involve linear and non-linear processes of word formation. This paper introduces this approach by means of sample datasets and a small Python library to facilitate annotation. Keywords: language comparison, cognacy, morphology, word formation, computer-assisted approaches 1 Introduction That larger levels of organization are formed as a result of the composition of lower levels is one of the key features of languages. Some scholars even assume that compositionality in the form of recursion is what differentiates human languages from communication systems of other species (Hauser et al. 2002). Whether one believes in recursion as an identifying criterion for human language or not (see Mukai 2019: 35), it is beyond question that we owe a large part of the productivity of human language to the fact that words are usually composed of other words (List et al. 2016a: 7f), as is reflected also in the numerous words in the lexicon of human languages. While compositionality in the sphere of semantics (see for example Barsalou 2017) is still less well understood, compositionality at the level of the linguistic form is in most cases rather straightforward.
    [Show full text]
  • Syntactic Reconstruction
    SYNTACTIC RECONSTRUCTION Sarah G. Thomason University of Michigan Syntactic reconstruction has not figured prominently in historical linguistic investigations, as can be surmised from the fact that the index of the recent 881-page Handbook of Histor- ical Linguistics (Joseph & Janda 2003) lists just seven pages, all in the same article, where it is discussed. As Fox observes, `Syntactic reconstruction is a controversial area...scholars working within the framework of the classical Comparative Method have been far less suc- cessful in applying their methods here than in the case of phonology of even morphology' (1995:104; see also Jeffers 1976). And in discussing this topic elsewhere, Fox does not point to any methods other than the Comparative Method that have offered promising results (1995:104-109, 190-194, 250-253, 261-270). Efforts to reconstruct syntax can be traced at least as far back as 1893-1900, when Delbr¨uck (as cited in Lehmann 1992:32) reconstructed OV word order for Proto-Indo-European. By far the most ambitious early effort at reconstructing syntax is Schleicher's \Proto-Indo- European fable", which was considered a rash enterprise even in those pre-Neogrammarian times (1868, as cited and translated in Jeffers & Lehiste 1979:107): Avis akv¯asaska `A sheep and horses' avis, jasmin varn¯ana ¯aast, dadarka akvams, tam, v¯aghamgarum vaghantam, tam, bh¯arammagham, tam, manum ¯akubharantam. avis akvabhjams ¯avavakat: kard aghnutai mai vidanti manum akvams agantam. Akv¯asas¯avavakant: krudhi avai, kard aghnutai vividvant-svas: manus patis varn¯amavis¯amskarnauti svabhjam gharman vastram avibhjams ka varn¯ana asti. Tat kukruvants avis agram ¯abhugat.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Evolution of the World's Languages - Ranko Matasović
    LINGUISTICS - Historical Evolution of the World's Languages - Ranko Matasović HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE WORLD'S LANGUAGES Ranko Matasović University of Zagreb, Croatia Keywords: language diversity, language families, comparative linguistics, linguistic palaeontology, population genetics, language spread, wave of advance model, elite dominance model Contents 1. Introduction 2. Models of language spread 2.1. Wave of advance 2.2. Elite dominance 3. Language families in the Old World 4. Language families in the New World 5. Recent history 6. Conclusion Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Interdisciplinary research and cooperation of linguistics, anthropology, archaeology and population genetics have led to new insights about the prehistory of language families of the world. Several models of language spread are used to account for the current distribution of the world's languages. In some cases, this distribution reflects large-scale prehistoric migrations (the "wave of advance" model), while in other cases languages have spread without the actual movement of people, often because the idiom of a small, but dominant group acquired a great social prestige and was adopted by the majority of a given population (the "elite dominance" model). 1. Introduction UNESCO – EOLSS The subject of this chapter is the historical developments that have led to the current state and distribution of languages and language families in the world. This subject has been investigatedSAMPLE from different points of CHAPTERSview, and it is currently an area of interdisciplinary research. The questions to be addressed are: why are some language families very small, in terms of the number of languages constituting them (e. g. the Kartvelian language family in the Caucasus, with only four languages), while others are extremely large (e.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchronic Reconstruction
    SYNCHRONIC RECONSTRUCTION John T. Jensen University of Ottawa 1. Reconstruction Historical linguistics recognizes two types of reconstruction. Comparative reconstruction compares cognate forms from two or more languages and posits an historical form from which the attested forms can be derived by plausible historical changes. A typical example is shown in (1). (1) Sanskrit: pitā́ Greek: patḗr PIE: *pәtḗr Latin: pater Gothic: fadar By comparing cognate forms in related languages, “the comparative method produces proto-forms, which cluster around a split-off point, a node in a family tree” (Anttila 1989: 274). Internal reconstruction compares related forms in a single language to determine a single form in an earlier stage from which those attested forms can be derived. A textbook example is Campbell’s (2004: 242) first exercise in his chapter on internal reconstruction, from German given in (2). (2) [ty:p] Typ ‘type’ [ty:pәn] Typen ‘types’ [to:t] tot ‘dead’ [to:tә] Tote ‘dead people’ [lak] Lack ‘varnish’ [lakә] Lacke ‘kinds of varnish’ [tawp] taub ‘deaf’ [tawbә] Taube ‘deaf people’ [to:t] Tod ‘death’ [to:dә] Tode ‘deaths’ [ta:k] Tag ‘day’ [ta:gә] Tage ‘days’ (Data: Campbell 2004: 242) This leads us to reconstruct historical forms in (3) and to posit the sound change in (4). (3) *ty:p *to:t *lak *tawb *to:d *ta:g Sound change: (4) [–sonorant] > [–voice] / ____ # According to Raimo Anttila, “[i]nternal reconstruction gives pre-forms, which can reach to any depth from a given point of reference…” (Anttila 1989: 274). Actes du congrès annuel de l’Association canadienne de linguistique 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCUSSION NOTES Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies
    DISCUSSION NOTES Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies MARTIN HASPELMATH Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology In this discussion note, I argue that we need to distinguish carefully between descriptive cate- gories, that is, categories of particular languages, and comparative concepts, which are used for crosslinguistic comparison and are specifically created by typologists for the purposes of compar- ison. Descriptive formal categories cannot be equated across languages because the criteria for category assignment are different from language to language. This old structuralist insight (called CATEGORIAL PARTICULARISM) has recently been emphasized again by several linguists, but the idea that linguists need to identify ‘crosslinguistic categories’ before they can compare languages is still widespread, especially (but not only) in generative linguistics. Instead, what we have to do (and normally do in practice) is to create comparative concepts that allow us to identify compara- ble phenomena across languages and to formulate crosslinguistic generalizations. Comparative concepts have to be universally applicable, so they can only be based on other universally appli- cable concepts: conceptual-semantic concepts, general formal concepts, and other comparative concepts. Comparative concepts are not always purely semantically based concepts, but outside of phonology they usually contain a semantic component. The fact that typologists compare lan- guages in terms of a separate set of concepts
    [Show full text]
  • 4 the History of Linguistics
    The History of Linguistics 81 4 The History of Linguistics LYLE CAMPBELL 1 Introduction Many “histories” of linguistics have been written over the last two hundred years, and since the 1970s linguistic historiography has become a specialized subfield, with conferences, professional organizations, and journals of its own. Works on the history of linguistics often had such goals as defending a particu- lar school of thought, promoting nationalism in various countries, or focuss- ing on a particular topic or subfield, for example on the history of phonetics. Histories of linguistics often copied from one another, uncritically repeating popular but inaccurate interpretations; they also tended to see the history of linguistics as continuous and cumulative, though more recently some scholars have stressed the discontinuities. Also, the history of linguistics has had to deal with the vastness of the subject matter. Early developments in linguistics were considered part of philosophy, rhetoric, logic, psychology, biology, pedagogy, poetics, and religion, making it difficult to separate the history of linguistics from intellectual history in general, and, as a consequence, work in the history of linguistics has contributed also to the general history of ideas. Still, scholars have often interpreted the past based on modern linguistic thought, distorting how matters were seen in their own time. It is not possible to understand developments in linguistics without taking into account their historical and cultural contexts. In this chapter I attempt to present an overview of the major developments in the history of linguistics, avoiding these difficulties as far as possible. 2 Grammatical Traditions A number of linguistic traditions arose in antiquity, most as responses to linguistic change and religious concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics What Is A
    Elissa Asp In contrast, de Saussure (1986: 122) describes paradigmatic relations in terms of absence. What is present in a syntagm gets part of its value from its associates or ‘mnemonic group’, which may include not only morphosyntactic associates such as the inflectional paradigms for verbs or declensions of nouns, but also items related via semantic, lexical, phonological or phonetic features. Consider the following example. (1) Sam slept through an afternoon In example (1), the value of any particular item is partially determined by the absent items with which it is in contrast: the referent Sam versus relevant other participants; past not present tense; contrasts for semantic features of sleep versus, for instance, doze; and so on for the other selections. This value is partial since selection and interpretation may also be affected by items copresent in a syntagm. For example, simple past tense verbs may be ambiguous between habitual and single-instance interpretations. Features of an accompa- nying time adjunct can push interpretation towards one of these. So a partial paraphrase of example (1) with singular indefinite an is on some occasion Sam did this, but the in the same environment leaves the interpretation ambiguous. Thus the selection of items present in a syntagm can be seen as functionally motivated not only by contrast with their absent associ- ates, but also by the syntagmatic environments in which they appear. For de Saussure, these axes – the syntagmatic and the paradigmatic; the arbitrary and motivated – were the central linguistic relations to be accounted for. Curiously, although all linguistic models recognise paradigmatic contrasts to some extent, most frame grammars in terms of syntagmatic structures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review on Historical Linguistic Written in Wikipedia
    A CRITICAL REVIEW ON HISTORICAL LINGUISTIC WRITTEN IN WIKIPEDIA Endang Yuliani Rahayu Universitas Stikubank Semarang Abstract When does a languague begin? The truth is that it happens since the era of Aristoteles. Learning from those great philosophers’ era, we might want to know further about historical languages. The history wil tell about the issues related to the languages and also other factors deal with it. The language here is not only English but also other languages. The record prove that there are some languages had been extinct since there are no more native speakers of the language. Since the language is found, the science of it is developed. The development of linguistics occurred until now. There are many branches of lingusitics. There have been some changes too due to the linguistics. To find out more about what historical linguistics is, the writer tries to give critical for the article uploaded in Wikipedia about Historicl Linguistics. Key words : language, linguistics, historical linguistics INTRODUCTION People communicate using language. There are two forms of languages namely verbal and non verbal. For the verbal type, we may say that it is spoken form but on the other hand the non verbal type belongs to written ones. What about body langauge? Which category does it belong to? Body langauge or is familiar with the term gesture belongs to non verbal language type. It is said so as the form of it is using the body part and body movement. Some people will say that this kind of language is known as sign language for special purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comparative Method in Syntactic Reconstruction
    The comparative method in syntactic reconstruction GEORGE WALKDEN Clare College, University of Cambridge Word count (including footnotes, excluding figures, tables and bibliography): 19,992 words Thesis submitted for the degree of MPhil in Linguistics, 2009 1 George Walkden The comparative method in syntactic reconstruction Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated in the text. 2 George Walkden The comparative method in syntactic reconstruction Abstract This thesis investigates the question of whether it is possible, or desirable, to use the comparative method as applied in phonological reconstruction to identify syntactic correspondences. I show that approaches proposed in the literature (e.g. by Lehmann 1974 or Harris & Campbell 1995) are problematic either because they do not follow the comparative method or because they do not do so in a principled enough fashion; objections raised in the literature (e.g. by Lightfoot 2002a) are then assessed, and I argue that most of these constitute no obstacle to syntactic reconstruction. I then sketch a method for applying the comparative method to syntactic reconstruction through comparison of the features of lexical items, including exponents of functional heads, applying an idea popular in current Minimalist thinking. This approach is then illustrated using examples drawn from the older Germanic languages: the Old Norse middle voice, the West Germanic inflected infinitive, and V-to-C movement. I suggest that pursuing an isomorphism between phonological and syntactic change has the potential to bear fruit in syntactic reconstruction, even if the parallels cannot be universally maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Comparative Phonology and Morphology of Kambata and Oromo
    Social Science Review Volume 6, Issue 1, June 2020 ISSN 2518-6825 Some Comparative Phonology and Morphology of Kambata and Oromo Tilahun Negash Mekuria Department of English Language and Literature Debre Markos University Ethiopia Abstract Comparative linguistics is a study which mainly focuses on comparing languages with a view of establishing their relatedness. This article presents some comparative analysis of studies on the phonological and morphological systems of Cushitic languages namely; Kambata and Oromo. Kambata is under Highland Land East Cushitic and Oromo is under Lowland East Cushitic. Comparative study of the Cushitic languages has been done fairly and this necessitated the study to be undertaken to determine the relatedness of the two Cushitic languages. The proposed study was guided by two objectives; to establish whether the languages are related and to discuss some forms and differences of linguistic elements in the languages. The data in this study was gathered from two natives from each language and the secondary data collected on the two languages. The comparative method then was involved in data analysis. The majority of the comparison is based on the secondary data collected on the respective languages from earlier studies on the languages. Distinctive features of the languages are indicated based on the findings. Correspondingly, different phonological and morphological aspects that make the languages identical or different are valued in the paper. The study established that the languages are related. It is observed that there are extraordinary similarities in phonemic and morphemic inventories. Based on the study objectives, it was recommended that Study of the Cushitic language should be done to clearly show their degree of relatedness.
    [Show full text]
  • High School Linguistics SUBMISSION VERSION Keith Mason
    1 Introducing Linguistics into Your Curriculum Offering language science can strengthen student preparation BY KEITH MASON Linguistics, the scientific study of language, deserves a presence in the high school curriculum because language is a basic human form of communication. Students often explore natural sciences, math, language arts, world languages, physical education, computer science, social studies, the arts and practical arts. An elective or required course in linguistics per se can certainly complement student learning in all these subjects. Studies have addressed the formal introduction of linguistics at the secondary level. Loosen (2014) describes a semester-length linguistics course taught at a Milwaukee high school. Larson, Denham & Lobeck (forthcoming) defends linguistics, and especially AP Linguistics, in the high school curriculum. Language is undoubtedly present in K-12 coursework. Nevertheless, the tenets of linguistics are barely treated in secondary learning. Students may glean linguistic knowledge indirectly in their regular courses. Because the various branches of linguistics maintain their own goals, we can argue that students can benefit from a deeper understanding of how and why language is the way it is. A more deliberate approach would ensure that students become knowledgeable about terminology, concepts, language structure, language development and variation in a systematic way that are inherently part of the field of linguistics. Students who are not college bound will also benefit from linguistics. If these students go directly to the work force, they can gain essential communication-friendly knowledge from an 2 in- depth study of linguistics. Employers report a lack of speaking or writing skills in employees. Linguistics can help in these two areas and more.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Comparative Linguistics?
    What is Comparative Linguistics? Linguistics is the scientific study of language. Comparative Linguistics is the study of human language as a species-specific phenomenon in all facets of its occurrences. Why are languages the way they are? How come there are both remarkable similarities and extreme differences in the languages of the world? How do languages change? Comparative Linguistics is chiefly interested in general patterns that shape each and every language, both in their current structure (synchrony) and in their historical developments (diachrony). In other words, Comparative Linguistics is a discipline that seeks to formulate general principles of language. As such it differs from language-specific programs like German Studies, Slavic Studies, etc. (in German: Germanistik, Slawistik, etc.), which seek to understand an individual language in ​ ​ ​ ​ itself. The kinds of principles that are studied in Comparative Linguistics cover the nature of the language faculty and the architecture of grammar, the evolution and history of language families and language areas, general patterns in the acquisition of languages by children and adults, and the relationship of languages with social and cultural structures on the one hand, and with patterns in cognition and the brain on the other hand. However, the empirical foundation of Comparative Linguistics ultimately lies in individual languages and their histories. Therefore, a comparative linguist is typically also concerned with detailed research on individual languages. As the large languages of Europe and elsewhere (English, French, Chinese, etc.) are typically already covered by language-specific programs, comparative linguists usually study less well-known languages when they seek to expand their database.
    [Show full text]