Stephen G. Alter. Darwinism and the Linguistic Image: Language, Race and Natural Theology in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. xii + 193 pp. $39.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8018-5882-6. Reviewed by Johann W. Tempelhoff Published on H-Ideas (January, 2001) Darwin and Historical Linguistics Such imagery was beneficial for the theory of nat‐ The theory of evolution as expounded by ural selection. Scholars are well aware of the im‐ Charles Darwin has been one of the most persis‐ pact of evolutionary theory on contemporary bio‐ tent themes for debate amongst scientists in the logical science. Alter claims this theory had an humanities and the natural sciences since the even greater impact on the study of linguistics. In nineteenth century. It is an all-embracing theory short, fundamental change was the order of the and tends to ft in effortlessly (and with consider‐ day in scientific thinking across a broad spectrum able controversy), with numerous perceptions of of disciplines. Alter's study in particular deals the self, society and science. Understandably the with Darwin's intellectual influence on contempo‐ major themes up for discussion have been the rary scientists and language scholars. Moreover, it compati- bility between natural history theory of deals with the intellectual investment the genera‐ humankind and certain moral tenets subscribed tion of the 1860's made in the image of evolution to by people of strong religious convictions. In the and the debates it generated (p. xi). natural sciences numerous investigations have Alter identifies fve stages of development. added new perspectives to our understanding of First, he considers linguistics in Europe prior to Darwinism. In the humanities the need for similar the period of Darwin. He then goes on to look at investigations have been of a somewhat more in‐ similar fgures (of speech/language) appearing in hibited nature. the works of Darwin's contemporaries. The third In his work, Darwin and the Linguistic Image: phase deals with the subtle form of polemic in Language, Race and Natural Theology in the Nine‐ which authors were involved when they dealt teenth Century, Stephen G. Alter explains from the with evolutionary theory, primarily from a lin‐ perspective of historical linguistics how Darwinist guistic perspective. Alter then describes the re‐ theory thrived on the contemporary culture of im‐ sponse the debate had on Darwin in his subse‐ agery in nineteenth-century scientific thought. quent publications. In the fnal section the con‐ H-Net Reviews cept of genealogy is explored as an integrative would be somewhat different from most conven‐ idea in both the biological and human sciences in tional studies in the feld. As Alter states, "Certain‐ the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (pp. xi-xii). ly in Britain, at least, the philologist and the anti‐ The author, as a result of the comprehensive fo‐ quary were related from the start," (p. 2.), thus cus of the work and the disparate nature of inves‐ suggesting that the principles of historicism were tigation, is able to deal with these themes with a vital force in dealing with matters historical and varying degrees of success. linguistic. Moreover, Alter argues that geologists At the end of the eighteenth century the En‐ and paleontologists were also collaborating with lightenment had a marked effect on the reception antiquarians and philologists. of academic endeavors in scientific discourse. >From the outset Alter brings in a very partic‐ This was particularly the case in Germany. It was ular narrative. He introduces the concept of ge‐ an era when idealism and nomothetic scientific nealogy, "the new discipline that was built around investigation prevailed. The trend was usurped the idea of branching descent from a common an‐ later with the emergence of romanticism that dis‐ cestor" (p. 2). Genealogy might have been a new mantled, in an ideographic manner, much of the approach in the natural sciences. It was, however, certainty with which scholars had formulated an old discipline in terms of historical studies. In "laws" operating in a compatible fashion between fact, it was a condensed and symbolic form of im‐ the human and the natural sciences. The sense of age transmission with the objective of introducing certainty and confidence of natural science was a hidden and almost invisible narrative discourse called into question by theories of language. The to secure the political hegemony of most monar‐ discipline of Philology featured prominently in chies in post-Napoleonic Europe. It is interesting this context. Starting with Schleiermacher in the that this form of abstraction was absorbed into German tradition, language became one of the scientific thinking to account for the creation of a most dynamic felds of investigation for the study hierarchy of natural origins. Biologically it makes of cultural transformation and hermeneutical un‐ sense. The structured images interact smoothly derstanding. with the emergence of the idea of the national Alter explains that Philology "was the most state. It helps in seeking identities of race in eth‐ common English label for the linguistic feld as a nological investigation. It was also aimed at locat‐ whole throughout the nineteenth century." (p. xii) ing root languages. What he does not point out is that a whole scien‐ Alter argues in a convincing manner that tific movement of thought, especially in the hu‐ "Charles Darwin was not acting as an isolated manities, hinged on this approach. It was Dilthey thinker when he came up with analogies to illus‐ who would later make the major contribution to‐ trate his species theory. Rather, he participated in wards our comprehension of the humanities and a close-knit discursive world, whose shared theo‐ social sciences in respect of their relationship to retical concerns and rhetorical usages were al‐ the biological and natural sciences. The author's ready promoting a sense of philology's natural objective, however, is not to look at the evolution resonance with other scientific felds" (p. 14). It is of the humanities and the central role of philology not easy to come in an outright manner to this in nineteenth century Germany. Rather, he aims conclusion. As a result of the focus of the work at focusing on the Anglo- Saxon (also the Anglo- one of the primary problems was, according to American) linguistic environment that fourished the author, that a distinction had to be drawn be‐ at the time when Darwin was an influential tween the language-species analogy and specula‐ thinker. It thus stands to reason that his focus tion, at the time of the actual origin of language 2 H-Net Reviews (p. 3). Alter, however, aims to get to the essential in the United States, constructed substantial argu‐ elements of what he describes as "comparative ments in opposition to Darwin. These were con‐ philology", based on the groundbreaking re‐ sidered quixotic and consequently ridiculed by searches of Friedrich Schlegel, who himself was of those within the Darwinian circle. More substan‐ the opinion that there was a basis for comparison tial criticism came from F. Max Muller, who par‐ between the Indian language and wisdom. tially in response to The Origin of the Species_, Schlegel however preferred the terminology of a started research into the origins of speech. "comparative grammar" (p. 9.) The new trends in In the narrative leading up to the publication philology, particularly comparative philology as of Darwin's The Descent of Man(1871), Alter ex‐ practiced by Frans Bopp (1791-1867) and Jacob plains how evolutionary theory permeated Ger‐ Grimm 1785-1863), started seeping into Britain man science circles. August Schleicher, a leading from Germany in the 1830's. comparative linguist, and the young zoologist, An interesting history of ideas starts unfold‐ Ernst Haeckel (1834-1920), became the leading ing when Alter explains that it was Darwin's spokespersons for the theory in the German lan‐ cousin, Hensleigh Wedgwood (1803-91), an ety‐ guage. So convinced was Haeckel that he forced mologist for the frst New English Dictionary, who "Darwinismus" into regions of biological and first put the evolutionist on to philological theory. philosophical theorizing that Darwin himself tried Darwin found in linguistics indications of the to avoid (p. 73). Schleicher in turn would go on to gradual evolution of language as phenomenon. It draw up a genealogy of the Indo-European lan‐ opened up vistas much wider than merely the guages in his Die Darwinsche Theorie und die phenomenon of language. He was able to perceive Sprachwissenschaft (1863). In Britain the theolo‐ in the "tree of life" (a symbol of significance for gian and language scholar, F.W. Farrar genealogy), a symbol for the family tree of lan‐ (1831-1903), was tolerant towards the theory of guage (p. 20). Apart from the similarities between natural selection. It was he who would promote a related languages, Darwin also noted there were debate on the way in which language was analo‐ some dissimilarities, such as the English word gous to the evolutionary biological processes. In‐ "bishop," which in French was "evequ." Both were creasingly, moves were afoot to elevate the disci‐ derived from the Greek "episkopos" (p. 21). The pline of philology as one of the major felds of sci‐ cultural rootedness of language made it possible entific endeavor (also in the natural sciences) (p. for the idea of ethnicity and the sense of national 87). In this section of the work Alter comes up identity to permeate the evolutionary theoriza‐ with sound historical scholarship. By consulting tion of Darwin in the period leading up to the Darwin's original notes, texts and relevant con‐ publication of The Origin of the Species in 1859. temporary articles in journals he opens up to the Darwin's work had a profound impact on evo‐ reader Darwin's perceptions on language and lutionary thinking in many disciplines.