DOCSLIB.ORG

What the World Owes to Laos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What the World Owes to Laos research article IUCJ 34 What the World Owes to Laos Laura Navarro[1] [1] Laura is a junior undergraduate at Duke Kunshan University majoring in political economy with tracks in economics. Abstract During the Vietnam War, the United States justifed a military intervention in Published online Southeast Asia as a means to contain the expansion of communism and consolidate their January 2021 power and credibility. Although the war offcially took place in North and South Vietnam, Citation Laos PDR became the most Navarro, Laura. 2020. “What heavily bombed country in the world during this period. This paper examines these bombing the World Owes to Laos.” IUCJ missions and their repercussions. Ultimately, the goal is to determine the level of responsi- 1, no. 1 (Winter 2021), 34-39. bility that the U.S. government and the international community hold in fostering coopera- tion to provide an effective remedy to the victims in Laos and, in doing so, supporting the sustainable development of the country. Keywords: Vietnam War; Secret War; UXO; U.S.-Lao relations; reparations Introduction future efforts. uring the Vietnam War, the United States justifed a mili- The Secret War Dtary intervention in Southeast Asia as a means to contain the expansion of communism and to consolidate their power On paper, the Vietnam War took place in Vietnam and Cam- and credibility (Rotondi 2020). While the war offcially took bodia between 1965 and 1973. Although the confict offcially place in North and South Vietnam, it is now recognized that the ended in 1973 after the Paris Peace Accords, it is now known United States also intervened militarily in Cambodia and Laos. that the fghting continued until 1975 (Rotondi 2020). Laos In fact, Laos PDR became the most heavily bombed country was a strategic target for the United States to disrupt the supply in the world during this period (COPE Laos 2016). However, chain to Vietnam on the Ho Chi Minh Trail; thus, despite being the war actions in Laos were not disclosed to the public as a signatory party of the International Agreements on the Neu- they directly violated the 1962 International Agreement on the trality of Laos, the United States began to bomb Laos as early Neutrality of Laos, and, as they pertained to a secret mission as 1964 and continued to do so until 1975 (Convery 2018). It of the CIA, these events were not offcially acknowledged by is estimated that, by the end of the war, 10% of the population the U.S. government for more than 40 years after the end of of Laos had been killed, over 20% had been severely wounded, the war (Shenoy 2016). The secrecy shrouding the situation in and approximately 25% had become refugees (Kurlantzick Laos earned it the name of the “Secret War.” 2017, 245-255). Although the United States has acknowledged it possesses War Crimes some level of responsibility in Vietnam and, to a lesser extent, Cambodia, it wasn’t until 2016 that former President Barack In order to provide a basis to assign responsibility, sanctions, Obama became the frst U.S. president to publicly admit that and reparations, it is necessary to defne the nature of the the United States dropped over a million tons of bombs in crime and its extent. In the case of the Vietnam War, this can Laos. Additionally, his administration doubled U.S. funding to be evaluated according to the framework of the international remove the unexploded ordnance that kill and maim people on humanitarian law. As will be discussed later, the crimes related a daily base (Shenoy 2016). Despite this, Laos’ fund is compar- to the bombing of Laos are not limited to war crimes nor to atively insignifcant to that provided to Vietnam, and, conse- the timeframe of the Vietnam War; however, this section will quently, it has been suggested that the United States has failed focus on the events of the Vietnam War and how they relate to to take full responsibility for their actions in Laos (Sisavatdy relevant international laws. 2018). War Crimes are generally defned as any act that violates the However, it is also essential to note that Laos’ government, in IHL. Some of the violations specifed include willful killing, some cases, has refused U.S. aid due to internal suspicions of torture and inhuman treatment, willfully causing great suffer- the American agenda in Southeast Asia (Andelman 1975, 3). ing, appropriation and destruction of property, and unlawful This paper will examine the bombing missions of the United deportation and confnement (United Nations 2020). Since the States in Laos during the 20th century and their repercussions. Geneva Conventions in 1949, all member states of the United The goal is to determine the level of responsibility that the U.S. Nations are required to abide by this law and any violations are government and the international community hold in fostering sanctioned by the International Criminal Court (International international cooperation to compensate war victims, impose Committee of the Red Cross 1949). sanctions, mitigate the effects of war remnants, and support the sustainable development of the country. To do so, the concepts In 1967, the International War Crimes Tribunal found the Unit- of war crime, foreign aid, responsibility, and reparations will ed States to be “guilty of all charges” for incurring war crimes be reviewed, and the relevant events, agents, and laws will such as genocide, use of forbidden weapons, maltreatment and be identifed. Ultimately, there will be an assessment of the killing of prisoners, and forceful displacement of civilians in reparatory progress in Laos and possible recommendations for Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. Notably, there was a strong 35 icUJ research article emphasis on the use of advanced weaponry in large areas pop- ulated by civilians (Foster 2017). For instance, cluster bombs UXO has also acted as a direct barrier to the development of were extensively used by the United States throughout the war. Laos. Frequent UXO-related injuries have severely impact- This type of weaponry has been prohibited since 2008 under ed the workforce. Victims of UXO who are lucky enough to the Convention on Cluster Munitions, as they have been found survive often face abundant obstacles to enter the work market to be extremely ineffective when fghting adversary troops but as their productivity is perceived to be greatly diminished. fatal to the civilian population. While cluster bombs cannot This is also true for young UXO victims who have to face be directed towards a narrow target or group and cause little signifcant emotional distress and social stigma in their schools damage to concrete and steel structures and weaponry, they do and communities (United Nations 2018). Moreover, heavily affect largely populated areas and are designed to “tear through contaminated areas usually correspond to rural provinces with the fesh of human bodies” (Foster 2020). It is estimated that, higher levels of poverty. This exacerbates the social gap due to from 1964 to 1973, the United States dropped over 7.5 million UXO-related obstacles to livelihood activity and its contribu- tons of bombs on Southeast Asia (Hikosaka 2019). As a result, tion to food insecurity (Soulineyadeth 2014, 2-4). the territories of Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos were devastated and their people had to face long-lasting psychological, physi- Similarly, the contaminated land cannot be safely used for cal, and societal consequences (Hart 2020). industrial purposes, tourism, infrastructure, transportation, or education. This has hindered the development of all industrial In light of these facts and in accordance with the Tribunal’s and productive sectors of the economy as well as impeding ruling, in 1972, the United States agreed to give 4.5 and 3.5 proper technical and educational outreach to respond to UXO billion (U.S.) dollars to North and South Vietnam, respective- discoveries and accidents in rural areas (United Nations 2018). ly. By 1973, however, the fgure was down to less than half of what it was initially. Additionally, this compensation was con- In 1996, the Laotian government established “UXO Lao,” a ditioned on the maintenance of the peace agreement between national program that coordinates the clearance of contaminat- North and South Vietnam; therefore, when the North took over ed areas for agriculture and community purposes. Since then, the South, the United States seized the opportunity to back off more regulatory entities have been established and the efforts to entirely from its commitment to reparations (Langguth 2000). destroy UXO have dramatically increased. No similar reparation was agreed upon to compensate for the In 2016, Laos launched a unique national Sustainable Devel- damage of the war and support the victims in Cambodia and opment Goal: SDG 18 “Lives safe from UXO.” The project Laos. pursues a programmatic support and oversight of the national efforts to identify UXO contamination, clear the land, and re- Remnants of the war spond to civilian discoveries. The initiatives of the last decade have reduced the annual UXO casualties by almost 85%; how- Although the war has been offcially over for more than 40 ever, from the end of the war to the present, less than 1% of the years, its repercussions continue to affect Laos’ political, UXO has been destroyed (Legacies of War 2011). Undoubtedly, economic, and social development. This is particularly relevant that means that people will continue to suffer due to this cause in the context of the long-lasting consequences of the bombing for many years to come. missions of the United States. For that reason, it is crucial to assess the developmental effects of UXO and Agent Orange, Agent Orange as well as their direct implications on the well-being of past, present, and future victims.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vietnam Relationship and War Legacies: 25 Years Into Normalization
    Transcript: The U.S. – Vietnam Relationship and War Legacies: 25 Years into Normalization The Stimson Center Zoom Webinar July 15, 2020 from 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM EST Courtney Weatherby: Thank you all for joining us for today’s event on the US – Vietnam Relationship and War Legacies. Before we begin, I just want to make a brief logistical note to inform all of you that we have simultaneous translation available between English and Vietnamese for today’s discussion. If you need to hear translation of comments, please go to the bottom of your screen to access the translation, which is labeled as the “German” channel for everyone. So if you are listening in English but would like to hear Vietnamese, please go into the German channel; if you are listening to the main audio and there are remarks provided in Vietnamese and you need to hear the English translation, please go into the German channel. It is an option at the bottom of your Zoom screen; it’s an easy transition, and I will also include logistical notes on how to do this in the chat box for everyone’s reference. And with that announcement, I am going to go ahead and turn everything over to our CEO, Brian Finlay. Brian Finlay: Courtney, thank you so much for helping to put all this together. We’re very grateful to you, my colleague, Courtney Weatherby. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to what is, for us, going to be a very special event at Stimson. Obviously, we wish we could be welcoming you all in person to the Stimson Center, but we’re really grateful for this opportunity to reach so many of you across the country and really around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of War : Unexploded Ordnance In
    LEGACIES OF WAR: UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE IN LAOS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ASIA, THE PACIFIC AND THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 22, 2010 Serial No. 111–117 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 56–094PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 15:07 Nov 10, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\APGE\042210\56094 HFA PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOWARD L. BERMAN, California, Chairman GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey Samoa DAN BURTON, Indiana DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey ELTON GALLEGLY, California BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois BILL DELAHUNT, Massachusetts EDWARD R. ROYCE, California GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RON PAUL, Texas DIANE E. WATSON, California JEFF FLAKE, Arizona RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri MIKE PENCE, Indiana ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey JOE WILSON, South Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas MICHAEL E. MCMAHON, New York J. GRESHAM BARRETT, South Carolina JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee CONNIE MACK, Florida GENE GREEN, Texas JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska LYNN WOOLSEY, California MICHAEL T.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Budget
    Congressional Budget JustificationFiscal Year 2022 Budget in Brief PHOTOGRAPH ON THE COVER: Gloria Luna Rivilla speaks with other members of the USIP-backed Network of Women Mediators, a Colombian group that helped strengthen the 2016 peace accord with the country’s main rebel group by broadening its inclusion of women and other marginalized groups. Rivilla, from the country’s Afro-Colombian minority, and the women mediators bolstered the roles of Colombia’s dozens of ethnic communities in the peace process. As Colombia struggles to implement the pact five years later, the women continue to mediate and prevent violence in local conflicts. (USIP Photo) May 28, 2021 Hon. Christopher “Chris” Coons, Chairman Hon. Barbara Lee, Chairwoman Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on House Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs United States Senate United States House of Representatives Hon. Lindsey Graham, Ranking Member Hon. Harold “Hal” Rogers, Ranking Member Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on House Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs United States Senate United States House of Representatives Dear Senators and Representatives: On behalf of the Board of Directors of the United States Institute of Peace, we are pleased to present the Institute’s FY 2022 Congressional Budget Justification for $45,000,000, equal to the enacted appropriation USIP received in FY 2021. In accordance with its Congressional mandate to prevent, mitigate and resolve violent conflict abroad, and in response to changing global realities and U.S. priorities, USIP is requesting funding for key programs and initiatives that advance peace.
    [Show full text]
  • A Peaceful Legacy Now: Briefing & Discussion on Cluster Bomb Removal and Assistance in Laos
    A Peaceful Legacy Now: Briefing & Discussion on Cluster Bomb Removal and Assistance in Laos November 5, 2009 · Washington, D.C. Legacies of War (www.legaciesofwar.org) is a non-profit organization whose mission is to raise awareness about the history of the Vietnam War-era bombing in Laos and advocate for the clearance of unexploded bombs, to provide space for healing the wounds of war, and to create greater hope for a future of peace. Front cover images: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 1. School children from Lathsene Village in Xieng Khouang 9. Signs warning villagers of the dangers of cluster bombs are a Province, Laos, home of a pre-school built through the generous common sight in Laos today. donations of Legacies of War supporters. 10. Children make up two-thirds of those injured or killed by 2. Historic illustrations collected by Fred Branfman in Laos during cluster bombs in Laos. the war and the inspiration for the Legacies of War National Traveling Exhibition. 11. Briefing participants from the governments of thet Lao PDR and the U.S., NGOs and community members. 3. Charles Stonecipher, U.S. Dept of State, and Madame Kanika Phommachanh, Lao PDR Mission to the UN, speak after their 12. An estimated 78 million cluster bombs still litter one-third of presentations. Laos. 4. Bomb casings are a common sight throughout villages in Laos. 13. Lao children born four decades after the end of the bombing still live with the remnants of the war. 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review by Tom Palaima of a War Remembered: the Vietnam
    2018-057 9 July 2018 A War Remembered: The Vietnam War Summit at the LBJ Presidential Library ed. Mark K. Updegrove . Austin: Briscoe Center for American History, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 2017. Pp. xxii, 242. ISBN 978–0– 9885083–8–5. Review by Thomas G. Palaima, The University of Texas–Austin ([email protected]) A War Remembered has been touted by its publisher as a “companion volume to a 2016 summit hosted by the LBJ Presidential Library [that] explores the lessons and legacy of America’s most divisive war, including the perspectives of luminaries such as US Secretaries of State Henry Kis- singer and John Kerry.” 1 Let the buyer beware. The designations “summit” and “luminaries” and mention of former high government officials suggest the conference (26–28 Apr. 2016) was a pecu- liar kind of public-relations event. It seems to have been convened to maintain historical legacies and reputations (for example, of Lyndon Baines Johnson) while preserving the concept of ineradi- cable American exceptionalism to explain why the Vietnam War (called the “American War” by the Vietnamese who lived through it or died in their millions) played out as it did, with the Unit- ed States winning the body count competition by a staggeringly wide margin. Although at the conference there were full sessions with expert panelists and moderators on the bloody battle of Ia Drang, the physical and psychological trauma that Vietnam veterans still suffer long after their “bitter, often hostile reception” back home, the rifts torn among the Ameri- can people, the impact of coverage of the war by print and photo journalists, the daily realities of fighting the war, and the music soldiers listened to while in country, these subjects are largely omitted from the published volume apart from brief remarks in photo captions.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era in U.S.-Vietnam Relations: Deepening Ties Two Decades After
    JUNE 2014 A Report of the CSIS Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies A New Era in U.S.-Vietnam Relations Deepening Ties Two Decades after Normalization 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW | Washington, DC 20036 t. 202.887.0200 | f. 202.775.3199 | www.csis.org ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Lanham, MD 20706 t. 800.462.6420 | f. 301.429.5749 | www.rowman.com Cover photo: Shutterstock.com. ISBN 978-1-4422-2869-6 AUTHORS Ë|xHSLEOCy228696z v*:+:!:+:! Murray Hiebert Phuong Nguyen Gregory B. Poling Blank A New Era in U.S.- Vietnam Relations Deepening Ties Two Decades after Normalization AUTHORS Murray Hiebert Phuong Nguyen Gregory B. Poling A Report of the CSIS Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies June 2014 ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofi t or ga ni za tion headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affi liated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to fi nding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 1964-1975 War in Southeast Asia
    Timeline of Mennonite and Quaker work on Cluster munitions1 By Virgil Wiebe and Titus Peachey August, 2011, Mennonite Central Committee In addition to Mennonite work, other timeline signposts are given for context. Bruce Shoemaker’s “Legacy of the Secret War” provides a detailed account of MCC work up until 1994.2 1960s August 13, 1966. Phu Xa, a suburb of Hanoi was bombed by cluster bombs.3 November 1966 American pacifist, David Dellinger visited North Vietnam and gave an account of the damage he saw by cluster bombs.4 April-May 1967 An ad hoc “International War Crimes Tribunal” is held in Stockholm, Sweden.5 1960s: AFSC opens a rehabilitation center in Quang Ngai, Vietnam where 90% of patients suffered injury from weapons, including landmines and cluster bombs. 1968: Quaker doctor Marjorie Nelson is captured by the Viet Cong in Hue and held for 2 months. During her captivity, Dr. Nelson found an exploded U.S. cluster bomblet. 1968-1990 Honeywell Project in Minnesota targets Honeywell Corporation for protests, shareholder proposals, and similar actions for its production of cluster munitions and other munitions. There is no formal Mennonite institutional involvement, but some participants are Mennonite. 1970s April 1971 – Senator Kennedy holds hearings on the U.S. air war: War Related Civilian Problems in Indochina, Part II Laos and Cambodia, Hearings before the 1 By Virgil Wiebe ([email protected]), edited by Titus Peachey ([email protected]). This timeline focuses perhaps a bit more on Mennonite efforts than Quaker, but mentions Quaker work as the two groups have worked together so closely over the decades on the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Nita M. Lowey Chairwoman
    March 18, 2009 The Honorable Nita M. Lowey Chairwoman, Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs House of Representatives Room HB-26 The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Kay Granger Ranking Member, Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs House of Representatives Room HB-26 The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chairwoman Lowey and Representative Granger: Legacies of War is writing to request an increase in the 2010 budget of the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement (PM/WRA) for Laos to $6 million, and for the opportunity to testify before the subcommittee detailing the urgent need for additional funding. This increase would be an important step toward fully funding unexploded ordnance (UXO) removal on high priority lands and victim assistance for Laos over the next three to five years. Legacies of War is a United States (U.S.) based nongovernmental organization formed in 2004 to raise awareness about the history of the Vietnam War-era bombing in Laos and advocate for the removal of unexploded bombs in Laos, to provide a space for healing the wounds of war, 1 and to create greater hope for a future of peace. The organization strives to represent the 200,000 Laotian Americans and millions of other Americans who seek to address the terrible lingering effects of U.S. involvement in the wider Vietnam War, including Laos and Cambodia. Our request comes after consultation with other organizations and individuals working on this issue both in the U.S. and Laos, including the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Conflict Economic Recovery Enabling Local Ingenuity
    CRISIS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY REPORT 2008 Post-Conflict Economic Recovery Enabling Local Ingenuity UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME _______________ BUREAU FOR CRISIS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY CRISIS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY REPORT 2008 Post-Conflict Economic Recovery Enabling Local Ingenuity UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME _______________ BUREAU FOR CRISIS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY Copyright © 2008 by the United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR) 1 UN Plaza, New York, New York, 10017, USA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission. ISBN: 978-92-1-126217-9 Available through: United Nations Publications Room DC2-853 New York, NY 10017 USA Telephone: 212 963 8302 and 800 253 9646 (From the United States) Email: [email protected] Web: www.un.org/Publications Web: www.undp.org/cpr Printed by AK Office Supplies (New York). Cover is printed on 100lb. recycled white coated cover and text pages are printed on 70lb. recycled white silk text. The paper used in this publication is chlorine free and meets the Sustainable Forests Initiative guidelines. Both cover and text are printed with vegetable-based inks and produced by means of environmentally-compatible technology. Editing: Green Ink Publishing Services Ltd (www.greenink.co.uk) Layout and Design: Van Gennep Design, New York Cover Photo: Villager Crossing a Bridge to a Refugee Camp, Malespe, Afghanistan, February 12, 2000 (Reza; Webistan/CORBIS) For a list of any errors or omissions found subsequent to printing, please visit our website at http://www.undp.org/cpr/we_do/eco_recovery.shtml ii Team for the Preparation of the Crisis Prevention and Recovery Report 2008 Lead authors John F.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE President Obama Announces Historic Increase in Funding for Removal of Unexploded Ordnance from Laos September 6, 2016 (Vientiane, Laos) – U.S. President Barack Obama today announced a substantial increase in funding for the removal of unexploded ordnance (UXO) from Laos, as part of his visit to Laos, the first-ever visit to Laos by a U.S. president. The President raised funding levels to $30 million a year over 3 years, for a total of $90 million. Since its founding in 2004, Legacies of War has encouraged the U.S. government to increase its funding for the UXO sector in Laos, resulting in a rise from just $3 million in 2008 to nearly $20 million in 2016. All of these funds go directly to operations on the ground in Laos, including survey, clearance, risk education and services for victims. “Legacies of War is thrilled by the President’s announcement and is deeply grateful to the countless supporters and institutional partners that have enabled the organization to carry out its crucial education and advocacy work,” said Channapha Khamvongsa, who was acknowledged by President Obama for her strong advocacy role. She continued, “but the President’s announcement of unprecedented levels of support for the UXO sector in Laos does not signal an end to our work. Clearance teams are not yet working in all areas of the country and victim assistance, particularly at the district and village level, is still at a very basic level. The work goes on.” U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy, a long-term champion of assistance to war victims, hailed the President’s announcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices from Laos Sponsorship Agreement
    Voices from Laos Sponsorship Agreement Date Signed_________________ Channapha Khamvongsa Individual Legacies of War, c/o Public Interest Organization Name Projects Address 1312 9th St. NW City, St Zip Washington, DC 20001 Phone number 202‐841‐7841 Email address [email protected] The parties above agree to the terms of partnership for the Voices from Laos: Clearing Bombs, Protecting Lives speakers tour laid out in this Sponsorship Agreement. Overview Between April 4th and April 30, Legacies of War, a project of Public Interest Projects, Inc., will travel to 12 cities across the U.S. with individuals from Laos whose lives have been deeply impacted by unexploded ordnance (UXO) left over from the Vietnam War‐era bombings of Laos. These individuals from Laos will join other speakers in cities across the U.S., including U.S./Lao/Hmong veterans, survivors of the bombings, and advocates working toward a bomb‐free Laos. In each city, Legacies will also work with community organizations to hold film screenings, art exhibits, and other cultural events to explore the experience of war and displacement, the danger that still lurks in Lao soil, and our shared hope for a future of peace. Tour Goals There are 3 primary goals for the tour: 1. Raise awareness and educate targeted U.S. audiences about the issue of UXO in Laos. Audiences will hear directly from individuals whose lives have been affected by UXO about the impact of this issue on communities in Laos and about the many courageous people in Laos working to solve it. Our goal is for attendees to learn about and engage in this issue through active dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese and American War Atrocities, Historical Memory and Reconciliation: World War II to Today
    Volume 6 | Issue 4 | Article ID 2724 | Apr 01, 2008 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Japanese and American War Atrocities, Historical Memory and Reconciliation: World War II to Today Mark Selden Japanese and American War Atrocities, relatively little analysis of United States Historical Memory and Reconciliation: atrocities, less criticism or recrimination for World War II to Today that nation’s commission and denial of atrocities, and still less demand for Mark Selden reparations? What are the consequences of this difference for the two nations and the contemporary international relations of the War Crimes, Atrocities and State Terrorism Asia Pacific? The controversies that continue to swirl around Among the war crimes and atrocities the Nanjing Massacre, the military comfort committed in World War II, the Nanjing women, Unit 731 and other Japanese military Massacre . or Rape of Nanjing, or Nankin atrocities rooted in colonialism and the Asia Daigyakusatsu, or Nankin Jiken (Japanese) or Pacific War are critical not only toNanjing Datusha (Chinese) . remains the understanding the dynamics of war, peace, and most controversial. These different names terror in the long twentieth century. They are signal alternative Japanese, Chinese and also vital for understanding war memory and international perceptions of the event: as denial, with implications for peace and regional “incident”, as “massacre”, as “rape”, as accommodation in the Asia Pacific region and “massive butchery”. the US-Japan relationship. [1] The Nanjing Massacre is controversial not This article offers a comparative framework for because the most basic facts are in doubt, understanding war atrocities and the ways in although historians continue to contest the which they are remembered, forgotten and number of deaths and the interpretation of memorialized.
    [Show full text]