Interaction of the Sympathetic Nervous System with Other Pressor Systems in Antihypertensive Therapy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Inline-Supplementary-Material-1.Pdf
Appendix 1: STOPP/START criteria version 2 applied to the TRUST dataset Physiological system Criteria Criteria included Number (%) (The relevant () criteria for each participant were applied to the dataset and recorded in of Microsoft Office Excel ® (2013)) criteria included out of total criteria STOPP criteria Indication of medication A1. Any drug prescribed without an evidence-based clinical indication. X 1/3 (33.3) A2. Any drug prescribed beyond the recommended duration, where treatment duration is X well defined. A3. Any duplicate drug class prescription e.g. two concurrent NSAIDs, SSRIs, loop diuretics, ACE inhibitors, anticoagulants (optimisation of monotherapy within a single drug class should be observed prior to considering a new agent). Cardiovascular system B1. Digoxin for heart failure with preserved systolic ventricular function (no clear evidence X 7/13 (53.8) of benefit). B2. Verapamil or diltiazem with NYHA Class III or IV heart failure (may worsen heart failure). B3. Beta-blocker in combination with verapamil or diltiazem (risk of heart block). B4. Beta blocker with symptomatic bradycardia (< 50/min), type II heart block or complete heart block (risk of profound hypotension, asystole). B5. Amiodarone as first-line antiarrhythmic therapy in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias X (higher risk of side-effects than beta-blockers, digoxin, verapamil or diltiazem). B6. Loop diuretic as first-line treatment for hypertension (safer, more effective alternatives available). B7. Loop diuretic for dependent ankle oedema without clinical, biochemical evidence or radiological evidence of heart failure, liver failure, nephrotic syndrome or renal failure (leg elevation and /or compression hosiery usually more appropriate). B8. Thiazide diuretic with current significant hypokalaemia (i.e. -
Imidazoline Antihypertensive Drugs: Selective I1-Imidazoline Receptors Activation K
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by FarFar - Repository of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade REVIEW Imidazoline Antihypertensive Drugs: Selective I1-Imidazoline Receptors Activation K. Nikolic & D. Agbaba Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe, Belgrade, Serbia Keywords SUMMARY α2-Adrenergic receptors; Centrally acting antihypertensives; Clonidine; Hypertension; Involvement of imidazoline receptors (IR) in the regulation of vasomotor tone as well as in Imidazoline receptors; Rilmenidine. the mechanism of action of some centrally acting antihypertensives has received tremen- dous attention. To date, pharmacological studies have allowed the characterization of three Correspondence main imidazoline receptor classes, the I1-imidazoline receptor which is involved in central K. Nikolic, Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of inhibition of sympathetic tone to lower blood pressure, the I2-imidazoline receptor which Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of is an allosteric binding site of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B), and the I3-imidazoline re- Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, 11000 Belgrade, ceptor which regulates insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells. All three imidazoline re- Serbia. ceptors represent important targets for cardiovascular research. The hypotensive effect of + Tel: 381-63-84-30-677; clonidine-like centrally acting antihypertensives was attributed both to α2-adrenergic re- + Fax: 381-11-3974-349; ceptors and nonadrenergic I1-imidazoline receptors, whereas their sedative action involves E-mail: [email protected] activation of only α2-adrenergic receptors located in the locus coeruleus. Since more selec- tive I1-imidazoline receptors ligands reduced incidence of typical side effects of other cen- trally acting antihypertensives, there is significant interest in developing new agents with higher selectivity and affinity for I1-imidazoline receptors. -
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors Single Entity Agents
Therapeutic Class Overview Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors Single Entity Agents Therapeutic Class Overview/Summary: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is the most important component in the homeostatic regulation of blood pressure.1,2 Excessive activity of the RAAS may lead to hypertension and disorders of fluid and electrolyte imbalance.3 Renin catalyzes the conversion of angiotensinogen to angiotensin I. Angiotensin I is then cleaved to angiotensin II by angiotensin- converting enzyme (ACE). Angiotensin II may also be generated through other pathways (angiotensin I convertase).1 Angiotensin II can increase blood pressure by direct vasoconstriction and through actions on the brain and autonomic nervous system.1,3 In addition, angiotensin II stimulates aldosterone synthesis from the adrenal cortex, leading to sodium and water reabsorption. Angiotensin II exerts other detrimental cardiovascular effects including ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling and myocyte apoptosis.1,2 The ACE inhibitors block the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, and also inhibit the breakdown of bradykinin, a potent vasodilator.4 Evidence-based guidelines recognize the important role that ACE inhibitors play in the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular and renal diseases. With the exception of Epaned® (enalapril solution) and Qbrelis® (lisinopril solution), all of the ACE inhibitors are available generically. Table 1. Current Medications Available in Therapeutic Class5-19 Generic Food and Drug Administration -
Low Dose of Moxonidine Within the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Improves the Baroreflex Sensitivity Control of Sympathetic Activity in Hypertensive Rat
npg Acta Pharmacologica Sinica (2009) 30: 1594–1600 © 2009 CPS and SIMM All rights reserved 1671-4083/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/aps Original Article Low dose of moxonidine within the rostral ventrolateral medulla improves the baroreflex sensitivity control of sympathetic activity in hypertensive rat Jia-ling WANG1, 2, #, Long WANG3, #, Zhao-tang WU4, #, Wen-jun YUAN1, Ding-feng SU4, Xin NI1, Jian-jun YAN5,*, Wei-zhong WANG1,* Department of 1Physiology and 4Pharmacology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; 2Department of Emergency, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China; 3Shanghai Research Center for Biomodel Organism, Shanghai 200433, China; 5The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China Aim: To determine the effects of the centrally antihypertensive drug moxonidine injected into the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) on baroreflex function in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Methods: Baroreflex sensitivity control of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) and barosensitivity of the RVLM presympathetic neu- rons were determined following application of different doses of moxonidine within the RVLM. Results: Three doses (0.05, 0.5, and 5 nmol in 50 nL) of moxonidine injected bilaterally into the RVLM dose-dependently reduced the baseline blood pressure (BP) and RSNA in SHR. At the highest dose (5 nmol) of moxonidine injection, the maximum gain (1.24%±0.04%/mmHg) of baroreflex control of RSNA was significantly decreased. However, the lower doses (0.05 and 0.5 nmol) of moxonidine injection into the RVLM significantly enhanced the baroreflex gain (2.34%±0.08% and 2.01%±0.07%/mmHg). The moxoni- dine-induced enhancement in baroreflex function was completely prevented by the imidazoline receptor antagonist efaroxan but not by the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine. -
What to Do When You Find Your Patient Is Non-Adherent to Antihypertensive Therapy ?
What to do when you find your patient is non-adherent to antihypertensive therapy ? Indranil Dasgupta Consultant in nephrology and hypertension Heartlands Hospital Birmingham Honorary Reader, University of Birmingham Conflict of interest • Received – Research grants: Medtronic and Daiichi Sankyo – Speaker fees: Sanofi, MSD, Pfeizer, GSK, Mitshubishi pharma, Otsuka, Agenda • Case studies • Size of the problem • Cost to the NHS • Detection • Factors responsible • Measures to improve adherence • Further research Case study 1 Case study 1 • 57 year old lady, FH of hypertension, BMI 38 • Mean BP in clinic: 171/92 mmHg • Mean daytime ABP: 147/84 mmHg • Current medications: – Amlodipine 10 mg once daily – Bisoprolol 2.5 mg once daily – Doxazosin MR 8 mg once daily – Furosemide 40 mg once daily – Indapamide 2.5 mg once daily – Losartan 100 mg once daily • Urine sent for antihypertenive drug assay Urine antihypertensive drug assay • She was advised to take amlodipine 5mg only and given life style advice especially to lose weight Case study 2 • 55 year old lady, teacher – Deputy Head of English • Recent clinic BP 175/104, 177/75, 222/114 • Known white coat effect, BMI 41 • Medication: – Losartan 100 mg once daily – Felodipine 20 mg once daily – Doxazosin 8 mg twice daily – Furosemide 60 mg once daily – Bisoprolol 7.5 mg once daily • Urine AHT assay requested She wouldn’t accept the result but since then her BP control has improved! Case study 3 • 41 year old man, engineer Rolls Royce • Referred a year ago for drop in GFR 64 to 23 • Losartan 150mg, -
Monteplase/Nadolol 1345 Moxisylyte Is Given As the Hydrochloride but the Dose May Be Tion Half-Life Is 2 to 3 Hours and Is Prolonged in Renal Pharmacopoeias
Monteplase/Nadolol 1345 Moxisylyte is given as the hydrochloride but the dose may be tion half-life is 2 to 3 hours and is prolonged in renal Pharmacopoeias. In Eur. (see p.vii), Jpn, and US. expressed in terms of the base. Moxisylyte hydrochloride impairment. Moxonidine is about 7% bound to plasma Ph. Eur. 6.2 (Nadolol). A white or almost white crystalline 45.2 mg is equivalent to about 40 mg of moxisylyte. proteins. It is distributed into breast milk. powder. Slightly soluble in water; freely soluble in alcohol; prac- In the management of peripheral vascular disease, the usual tically insoluble in acetone. oral dose is the equivalent of 40 mg of moxisylyte four times dai- USP 31 (Nadolol). A white or off-white, practically odourless, ly increased if necessary to 80 mg four times daily. It should be Uses and Administration crystalline powder. Soluble in water at pH 2; slightly soluble in withdrawn if there is no response in 2 weeks. Moxonidine is a centrally acting antihypertensive water at pH 7 to 10; freely soluble in alcohol and in methyl alco- Moxisylyte has been used locally in the eye to reverse the my- structurally related to clonidine (p.1247). It appears to hol; insoluble in acetone, in ether, in petroleum spirit, in trichlo- driasis caused by phenylephrine and other sympathomimetics. It act through stimulation of central imidazoline recep- roethane, and in benzene; slightly soluble in chloroform, in dichloromethane, and in isopropyl alcohol. has also been used orally in benign prostatic hyperplasia, al- tors to reduce sympathetic tone, and also has alpha - though such use has been associated with hepatotoxicity; the 2 doses used in prostatic hyperplasia were generally higher than adrenoceptor agonist activity. -
Update on Rilmenidine: Clinical Benefits
AJH 2001; 14:322S–324S Update on Rilmenidine: Clinical Benefits John L. Reid Rilmenidine is an imidazoline derivative that appears to consistent with a reduction in long-term cardiovascular lower blood pressure (BP) by an interaction with imida- risk, as would recently described actions on the heart zoline (I1) receptors in the brainstem (and kidneys). Ril- (reducing left ventricular hypertrophy) and the kidney menidine is as effective in monotherapy as all other first- (reducing microalbuminuria). Although no data are yet Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajh/article/14/S7/322S/137317 by guest on 28 September 2021 line classes of drugs, including diuretics, -blockers, available from prospective long-term outcome studies, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and cal- rilmenidine could represent an important new develop- cium antagonists. It is well tolerated and can be taken in ment in antihypertensive therapy and the prevention of combination for greater efficacy. Sedation and dry mouth cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens 2001;14:322S–324S are not prominent side effects and withdrawal hyperten- © 2001 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. sion is not seen when treatment is stopped abruptly. Recently, in addition to a reduction in BP, this agent Key Words: Blood pressure, rilmenidine, imidazoline, insu- has been shown to improve glucose tolerance, lipid risk lin resistance, metabolic syndrome, microalbuminuria, ventricu- factors, and insulin sensitivity. These changes would be lar hypertrophy, end-organ damage. n spite of major developments during the past 50 included in the treatment choice of several key outcome years, there is still no single ideal antihypertensive trials (Veterans Administration [VA] trials and European I drug. -
The Effect of Moxonidine on Plasma Lipid Profile and on LDL Subclass
Journal of Human Hypertension (1999) 13, 781–785 1999 Stockton Press. All rights reserved 0950-9240/99 $15.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/jhh ORIGINAL ARTICLE The effect of moxonidine on plasma lipid profile and on LDL subclass distribution MS Elisaf, C Petris, E Bairaktari, S-A Karabina, C Tzallas, A Tselepis and KC Siamopoulos Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina Medical School, Greece Moxonidine is a new antihypertensive agent whose cant decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood ,mechanism of action appears to involve specific stimu- pressure (from 147 ؎ 10 to 131 ؎ 11 mm Hg, P Ͻ 0.001 ,lation of imidazoline receptors resulting in an inhibition and from 98 ؎ 4.5 to 86 ؎ 5 mm Hg, P Ͻ 0.001 of the activity of the central and peripheral sympathetic respectively). No significant change in plasma lipid pro- nervous system. The drug seems to behave neutrally file was observed after moxonidine administration. with respect to plasma lipid parameters. However, there Additionally, no change in the susceptibility of LDL sub- are no data on the effects of moxonidine on the low- classes to copper-induced oxidative modification was density lipoprotein (LDL) subclass pattern or on the LDL noticed. Finally, drug therapy was not followed by any oxidation susceptibility, both of which are known to play change in either LDL phenotype or in mass and compo- a prominent role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. sition of the three LDL subfractions. We conclude, that Thus, we undertook the present study to examine the unlike other antihypertensive drugs, such as beta-block- influence of moxonidine on the LDL subspecies profile ers which may predispose to expression of a relatively and their susceptibility to copper-induced oxidative atherogenic lipoprotein subclass pattern, moxonidine modification in 20 hypertensive patients (11 men, 9 does not affect either plasma lipid parameters or lipo- women) aged 38–61 years. -
Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 1/41
Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 ATC code ATC group / Active substance (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit DDD/1000/ day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 167,8985 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0738 A01AB09 Miconazole (O) 7088 g 0,2 g 0,0738 A01AB12 Hexetidine (O) 1951200 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+ Benzocaine (dental) 30200 pieces A01AB82 Demeclocycline+ Triamcinolone (dental) 680 g A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+ Thymol (dental) 3094 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+ Cetylpyridinium chloride (gingival) 227150 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+ Cetrimide (O) 30900 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate (O) 864720 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+ Chamomille extract (O) 370080 g A01AD90 Lidocaine+ Paraformaldehyde (dental) 405 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 47,1312 A02A ANTACIDS 1,0133 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 1,0133 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 811120 pieces 10 pieces 0,1689 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 3101974 ml 50 ml 0,1292 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+ Magnesium carbonate (O) 3434232 pieces 10 pieces 0,7152 DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 46,1179 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 2,3855 A02BA02 Ranitidine (O) 340327,5 g 0,3 g 2,3624 A02BA02 Ranitidine (P) 3318,25 g 0,3 g 0,0230 A02BC Proton pump inhibitors 43,7324 A02BC01 Omeprazole -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,080,578 B2 Liggett Et Al
USO08080578B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,080,578 B2 Liggett et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Dec. 20, 2011 (54) METHODS FOR TREATMENT WITH 5,998.458. A 12/1999 Bristow ........................ 514,392 BUCNDOLOL BASED ON GENETIC 6,004,744. A 12/1999 Goelet et al. ...... 435/5 6,013,431 A 1/2000 Söderlund et al. 435/5 TARGETING 6,156,503 A 12/2000 Drazen et al. ..... ... 435/6 6,221,851 B1 4/2001 Feldman ... 51446 (75) Inventors: Stephen B. Liggett, Clarksville, MD 6,316,188 B1 1 1/2001 Yan et al. .......................... 435/6 6,365,618 B1 4/2002 Swartz ... 514,411 (US); Michael Bristow, Englewood, CO 6,498,009 B1 12/2002 Liggett ............................. 435/6 (US) 6,566,101 B1 5/2003 Shuber et al. 435,912 6,586,183 B2 7/2003 Drysdale et al. .................. 435/6 (73) Assignee: The Regents of the University of 6,784, 177 B2 8/2004 Cohn et al. 514,248 Colorado, a body corporate, Denver, 6,797.472 B1 9/2004 Liggett ......... ... 435/6 6,821,724 B1 1 1/2004 Mittman et al. ... 435/6 CO (US) 6,861.217 B1 3/2005 Liggett ......... ... 435/6 7,041,810 B2 5/2006 Small et al. ... ... 435/6 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 7, 195,873 B2 3/2007 Fligheddu et al. ... 435/6 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 7,211,386 B2 5/2007 Small et al. ....... ... 435/6 7,229,756 B1 6/2007 Small et al. -
Beta-Blockers for Hypertension: Time to Call a Halt
Journal of Human Hypertension (1998) 12, 807–810 1998 Stockton Press. All rights reserved 0950-9240/98 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/jhh FOR DEBATE Beta-blockers for hypertension: time to call a halt DG Beevers University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK Beta-blockers are not very effective at lowering blood the endorsement of beta-blockers by the British Hyper- pressure in elderly hypertensive patients or in Afro- tension Society and other guidelines committees, Caribbeans and these two groups represent a large pro- except possibly for severe resistant hypertension, high portion of people with raised blood pressure. Further- risk post-infarct patients and those with angina pectoris. more they do not prevent more heart attacks than the The time has come to move across to newer, safer, more thiazide diuretics. Beta-blockers can also be dangerous tolerable and more effective antihypertensive agents in many hypertensive patients and even when these whilst continuing to use thiazide diuretics in low doses drugs are not contraindicated, they cause subtle and in the elderly as first choice, providing there are no depressing side effects which should preclude their contraindications. usefulness. The time has come therefore to reconsider Keywords: beta-blockers; hypertension Introduction Safety and tolerability Beta-adrenergic blockers were first introduced in the There is little doubt that the beta-blockers are the early 1960s for the treatment of angina pectoris. most unsafe of all antihypertensive drugs. They can Their antihypertensive properties were not fully precipitate or worsen heart failure in patients with recognised until the celebrated paper by Pritchard myocardial damage and they are contraindicated in and Gillam in 1964.1 They rapidly became popular patients with asthma. -
3. Diuretics for Hypertension-A Review and Update
REVIEW Diuretics for Hypertension: A Review and Update George C. Roush1 and Domenic A. Sica2 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajh/article-abstract/29/10/1130/2622231 by Xenia Agorogianni user on 17 July 2019 This review and update focuses on the clinical features of hydrochlo- ectopy and reduce the risk for sudden cardiac death relative to thi- rothiazide (HCTZ), the thiazide-like agents chlorthalidone (CTDN) and azide-type diuretics used alone. A recent synthesis of 44 trials has indapamide (INDAP), potassium-sparing ENaC inhibitors and aldos- shown that the relative potencies in milligrams among spironolac- terone receptor antagonists, and loop diuretics. Diuretics are the sec- tone (SPIR), amiloride, and eplerenone (EPLER) are approximately ond most commonly prescribed class of antihypertensive medication, from 25 to 10 to 100, respectively, which may be important when SPIR and thiazide-related diuretics have increased at a rate greater than is poorly tolerated. SPIR reduces proteinuria beyond that provided by that of antihypertensive medications as a whole. The latest hyper- other renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors. EPLER also reduces tension guidelines have underscored the importance of diuretics for proteinuria and has beneficial effects on endothelial function. While all patients, but particularly for those with salt-sensitive and resist- guidelines often do not differentiate among specific diuretics, this ant hypertension. HCTZ is 4.2–6.2 systolic mm Hg less potent than review demonstrates that these distinctions are important for man- CTDN, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, and aging hypertension. calcium channel blockers by 24-hour measurements and 5.1 mm Hg systolic less potent than INDAP by office measurements.