DOCSLIB.ORG

The Intelligence Archipelago

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Intelligence Archipelago Joint Military Intelligence College GUTJAHR THE INTELLIGENCE ARCHIPELAGO GUTJAHR THE INTELLIGENCE THE INTELLIGENCE ARCHIPELAGO The Community’s Struggle to Reform in the Globalized Era TEL IN LIG Y E R N A C T E I L C I O M L L T E N G I E O J 1962 Melanie M. H. Gutjahr TEL IN LIG Y E R N A C ISBN 1-932946-03-9 T E PCN 55646 I L C I O M L L T E N G I E O J 1962 The Joint Military Intelligence College supports and encourages research on intelligence issues that distills lessons and improves Intelligence Community capabilities for policy-level and operational consumers The Intelligence Archipelago: The Community’s Struggle to Reform in the Globalized Era This product has been reviewed by senior experts from academia, industry and government, and has been approved for unrestricted distribution by the Office of Freedom of Information and Security Review, Washington Headquarters Services. It is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service (www.ntis.gov). In this book, Melanie Gutjahr addresses the documentation surrounding the history of U.S. national intelligence reform efforts, going back almost to the beginning of post-WWII intelligence. She examines the question of whether the Intelligence Community appears capable of reshaping itself quickly and effectively enough to cope with 21st century expressions of globalization. Finding a negative answer to that question, she goes on to address the prospect that Congress may generate the wherewithal to effect a transformation in intelligence matters by building on the Intelligence Reform Act of 2004. [email protected], Editor and Director Center for Strategic Intelligence Research Library of Congress Control Number 2005924958 ISBN 1-932946-03-9 THE INTELLIGENCE ARCHIPELAGO The Community’s Struggle to Reform in the Globalized Era Melanie M. H. Gutjahr In g ic t e e g ll t ii a g e r n tt c SS c ee rr R R o o e e f f s s e e r r a a e e t r t r n c n Joint Military c e h e h C Intelligence College C WASHINGTON, DC May 2005 The views expressed in this book are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government i CONTENTS Acknowledgements . vii Commentaries . ix Art Grant, Raytheon Company Russell E. Travers, National CounterTerrorism Center Review Essay . xi Failures, Fallacies and Fixes: Posturing Intelligence for the Challenges of Globalization, by Russell E. Travers Author’s Preface . xxv 1. Introduction . 1 The Issue . 4 Methodology and Limitations . 4 Significance of Research . 5 2. Fundamental Concepts . 7 What is Intelligence? . 7 What is Intelligence Reform? . 9 What is Oversight?. 10 What is Globalization?. 13 3. Past: Historical Perspective: Shapers of the Intelligence Community During the Cold War (1945-1989). 17 National Security Act of 1947 . 17 The Bipolar Environment. 21 Intelligence Community in the 20th Century. 24 Cold War Intelligence Reform 1947-1989. 27 Cold-War Era Reform Efforts in Retrospect . 32 4. Recent Past: Stalled Reform (1990-2000) . 33 Post-Cold War Environment . 34 Post-Cold War Intelligence Reform . 40 iii Post-Cold War Reform in Context . 48 Hart-Rudman Commission 1999-2001 . 49 5. Present: Post 9/11 Strategies for Reform . 57 9/11 Surprise? . 57 Joint Inquiry Commission . 68 9/11 Commission . 71 Joint Inquiry and 9/11 Commission Recommendations . 74 Luminaries Respond to 9/11 Committee Recommendations . 80 Reform Effects of Presidential Executive Order . 85 6. Intelligence in the Post-9/11 World . 89 Globalization and the Intelligence Community . 89 Information Revolution and the Intelligence Community . 113 7. 21st Century: The Rocky Road Ahead . 129 A Changed Community Since 9/11? . 129 Post-9/11 Community-Wide Issues . 134 The Way Ahead: The Networked Community . 146 Horizontal Integration and the IC . 151 Congressional Oversight and the IC . 158 8. Post 9/11 Intelligence Reform . 163 Protecting the Turf . 163 Passage of Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 . 167 Congressional Oversight . 173 DNI and Community Relationships . 175 Analysis . 177 9. Conclusion . 181 iv Appendix A — National Security Act of 1947, as amended . 187 Appendix B — Cold-War Intelligence Reform 1945-1989 . 191 Appendix C — Post Cold-War Intelligence Reform 1990-2000 . 205 Appendix D — Talking Heads Intelligence Reform . 219 Appendix E — Post 9/11 Intelligence Reform Reports . 227 Appendix F — GAO Human Capital Management Reference Tables . 249 Appendix G — Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 . 251 Acronyms . 259 Bibliography . 263 About the Author . 283 v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author gratefully acknowledges the following individuals who made this research project possible. The senior leadership of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency who selected me as the NGA participant in the FY2004 Intelligence Research Fellows Program at the Center for Strategic Intelligence Research (CSIR) at the Joint Mil- itary Intelligence College (JMIC), and colleagues in my assigned organization, NGA/Enterprise directorate (Information Management), who promoted my application. Mr. Art Grant, LTC (U.S. Army, Ret.), former House Intelligence Committee staff member and currently Vice President, National Intelligence, Space and Geospatial Programs for the Raytheon Company; and Russ Travers, Deputy Director, National CounterTerrorism Center, who reviewed the manuscript and provided commentaries. Dr. Russell Swenson, Director of the CSIR. His editorial comments and direc- tion have been invaluable to the completion of this project. The library research staffs at the Defense Intelligence Agency and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, who provided source assistance. An anonymous NGA analyst, who provided map reconstruction assistance. Lastly, the author would like to express a heartfelt appreciation to my family— Hannah and Joshua Gutjahr—for their continued support and encouragement. vii COMMENTARIES In her research project, The Intelligence Archipelago: The Community’s Strug- gle to Reform in the Globalized era, Ms. Melanie Gutjahr has made a significant contribution to our understanding of how Intelligence is conducted, the future implications for our national security if changes do not occur, and the role the recently enacted “Intelligence and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004” will play in helping to determine the future of U.S. Intelligence. Her diligent research com- bined with her personal knowledge of the arcane and esoteric world of intelli- gence provides the basis for her clear analysis and strong conclusions. This is an excellent body of work, worthy of study by anyone interested in U.S. Intelligence and interested in making a world class Intelligence Community even more effec- tive than it is today. Her description of the history of the U.S. Intelligence Community and efforts to reform it since World War II provides the necessary context for understanding the Community’s current organization and the public and private calls for change. She describes in detail the most significant attempts to reform U.S. Intelligence and the responses of career Intelligence officers. Her descriptions show recurring themes throughout the period suggesting that important shortcomings have repeatedly not been addressed. It is this repetitive resistance to change that makes her historical narrative both troubling and sad. In many instances, it appears that career intelligence officers respond to criticisms by asserting that change has occurred after the critiques were developed and therefore suggestions for reform apply to a Community that no longer exists. It certainly is true the intelligence domain is very dynamic and today is different than yesterday, this week is rather different than last week, and this month is very different than six months ago. But it is quite clear that the recurring themes demonstrate a failure to acknowledge problems and to create a future that addresses the fundamental shortcomings of today, yesterday, last month, last year–and tomorrow. The career intelligence officer response to arguably the nation’s worst strategic surprise on September 11th appears to be no different than responses in the past: you don’t understand intelligence, leave us alone, we will fix it on our own. Ms. Gutjahr’s work pro- vides the essential understanding of this context. Her analysis of the implications if changes do not occur is very important. Moreover, her understanding of the effects of “globalization” and the significance of the digital age are of great value in appreciating the urgency for reform. She assesses the imperfect “Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004” and the opportunity it gives the nation to “get it right.” Unfortunately, she does not reveal unbridled optimism about the future of intelligence reform. Career intelligence officer responses to the new law—and other agents for ix change—so far appear to be no different than they have been in past. Nonethe- less, as she advises: Reform must be construed as a Community-wide, never-ending series of process improvement tasks. Processes and procedures that guarantee success against our opponent today will be ill-advised as we face tomorrow’s enemy. The Community must maintain a constant watch against complacency. As Ms. Gutjahr notes, much remains to be done and the only people who can get it done are the career intelligence officers who are never seen publicly and have devoted their lives to keeping us all safe. The intelligence archipelago must become a sea without islands. Art Grant Vice President, National Intelligence, Space and Geospatial Programs, the Raytheon Company Ms. Gutjahr makes a valuable contribution to what has been, thus far, a woe- fully inadequate discussion of intelligence reform. Despite high profile Commis- sions, legislative initiatives, and more focus on the Community than has existed in many years, the quality of the debate remains shallow and confused. Unfortu- nately, the various external efforts to date have done a far better job of chronicling intelligence failures (a valuable contribution to be sure) than they have of recom- mending workable solutions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Studies in Applied Economics
    SAE./No.128/October 2018 Studies in Applied Economics THE BANK OF FRANCE AND THE GOLD DEPENDENCY: OBSERVATIONS ON THE BANK'S WEEKLY BALANCE SHEETS AND RESERVES, 1898-1940 Robert Yee Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise The Bank of France and the Gold Dependency: Observations on the Bank’s Weekly Balance Sheets and Reserves, 1898-1940 Robert Yee Copyright 2018 by Robert Yee. This work may be reproduced or adapted provided that no fee is charged and the proper credit is given to the original source(s). About the Series The Studies in Applied Economics series is under the general direction of Professor Steve H. Hanke, co-director of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise. About the Author Robert Yee ([email protected]) is a Ph.D. student at Princeton University. Abstract A central bank’s weekly balance sheets give insights into the willingness and ability of a monetary authority to act in times of economic crises. In particular, levels of gold, silver, and foreign-currency reserves, both as a nominal figure and as a percentage of global reserves, prove to be useful in examining changes to an institution’s agenda over time. Using several recently compiled datasets, this study contextualizes the Bank’s financial affairs within a historical framework and argues that the Bank’s active monetary policy of reserve accumulation stemmed from contemporary views concerning economic stability and risk mitigation. Les bilans hebdomadaires d’une banque centrale donnent des vues à la volonté et la capacité d’une autorité monétaire d’agir en crise économique.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moorer Commission
    The Moorer Commission 1 Findings of the Independent Commission of Inquiry into the Israeli Attack on USS Liberty, the Recall of Military Rescue Support Aircraft while the Ship was Under Attack, and the Subsequent Cover - up by the United States Government October 22, 2003 Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, U.S. Navy (deceased) Former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff General Raymond G. Davis, U.S. Marine Corps (deceased) (MOH)*, Former Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps Rear Admiral Merlin Staring, U.S. Navy (deceased) Former Judge Advocate of the Navy (73 - 75) Ambassador James Akins (deceased) Former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (73 - 76) We, the undersigned having undertaken an independent investigation of Israel’s attack on USS Liberty , including eyewit ness testimony from surviving crewmembers, a review of naval and other official records, an examination of official statements by the Israeli and American governments, a study of the conclusions of all previous official inquiries, and a consideration of im portant new evidence and recent statements from individuals having direct knowledge of the attack or the cover up, hereby find the following:** 1. That on June 8, 1967, after eight hours of aerial surveillance, Israel launched a two - hour air and naval attack against USS Liberty, the world’s most sophisticated intelligence ship, inflicting 34 dead, and 173 wounded American servicemen (a casualty rate of 70%, in a crew of 294).; 2 2. That the Israeli air attack lasted approximately 25 minutes, during which time un marked Israeli aircraft dropped napalm canisters on USS Liberty’s bridge, and fired 30mm cannons and rockets into our ship, causing 821 holes, more than 100 of which were rocket - size; survivors estimate 30 or more sorties were flown over the ship by minimu m of 12 attacking Israeli planes which were jamming all 5 American emergency radio channels; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1 Œ CENTRAL BANK STATUORTY GOLD RESERVE REQUIREMENTS
    Appendix 3. Central Bank Gold Reserve Statutes Table 1 – CENTRAL BANK STATUTORY GOLD RESERVE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE CLASSICAL GOLD STANDARD (1880 – 1914) COUNTRY LEGAL RESERVE REQUIREMENTS Argentina – Currency Board 1899 1913 Australia 25% in gold on bank notes up to £7,000,000, 100% above that (law of 1910). Before 1910 no government notes, no legal reserve requirements on commercial bank notes. Belgium 33 1/3% on notes and other demand liabilities Brazil 33 1/3% in gold on note issue (Act of 1890); 100% in gold and convertible securities: Currency Board (1906-1914) Canada 25% on Dominion notes in excess of 20 million. No legal reserve requirements on chartered banks. Chile None Denmark 37.5% in gold coin or bullion on notes until 1907; thereafter 50%. Finland maximum uncovered note issue of 40,000,000 marks, 100% cover in gold, foreign exchange above that France None Germany 33 1/3% in gold coin or bullion on note liabilities Greece 3 1/3% in gold coin or bullion on notes Italy 40% in gold or silver on notes Japan on note liability in gold coin or bullion in excess of fiduciary issue of 120,000,000 yen (1899) Netherlands 40% in gold coin on notes and deposits Norway on note liabilities, 100% in gold coin or bullion in excess of fiduciary issue of 35,000,000 crowns Table 1 – CENTRAL BANK STATUTORY GOLD RESERVE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE CLASSICAL GOLD STANDARD (1880 - 1914) COUNTRY LEGAL RESERVE REQUIREMENTS Portugal 33 1/3% in gold coin or bullion on note circulation and demand liabilities Spain 33 1/3% cash reserve on a maximum note issue of 1,500,000 pesetas, at least one half to be held in gold Sweden 40 million kroner in gold on notes Switzerland 40% in gold coin on notes United Kingdom 100% in gold coin or bullion on notes in excess of fiduciary issue (£ 14 million plus two - third of lapsed bank notes) United States as of 1900, Treasury minimum of 100 million in gold coin Sources: Germany, Sweden, Italy in Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors of Central Intelligence As Leaders of the U.S
    All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed in this book are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Central Intel- ligence Agency or any other US government entity, past or present. Nothing in the contents should be construed as asserting or implying US government endorsement of the authors’ factual statements and interpretations. The Center for the Study of Intelligence The Center for the Study of Intelligence (CSI) was founded in 1974 in response to Director of Central Intelligence James Schlesinger’s desire to create within CIA an organization that could “think through the functions of intelligence and bring the best intellects available to bear on intelli- gence problems.” The Center, comprising professional historians and experienced practitioners, attempts to document lessons learned from past operations, explore the needs and expectations of intelligence consumers, and stimulate serious debate on current and future intelligence challenges. To support these activities, CSI publishes Studies in Intelligence and books and monographs addressing historical, operational, doctrinal, and theoretical aspects of the intelligence profession. It also administers the CIA Museum and maintains the Agency’s Historical Intelligence Collection. Comments and questions may be addressed to: Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Printed copies of this book are available to requesters outside the US government from: Government Printing Office (GPO) Superintendent of Documents P.O. Box 391954 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954 Phone: (202) 512-1800 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 1-929667-14-0 The covers: The portraits on the front and back covers are of the 19 directors of central intelligence, beginning with the first, RAdm.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Chapter 4 Building International Will and Capacity to Counter Terrorism The Department of State engages diplomatically with for- eign governments and in international and regional fora to accomplish the US Government’s first priority — protect- ing Americans at home and abroad. The Department of State’s diplomatic efforts help build the political will and operational skills of foreign governments to combat terror. Many countries are committed allies in the global war on terrorism. Some, however, need train- ing and resources to develop stronger institutions and capabilities. The Department of State’s counterterrorism efforts are an essential component in the success of US military, law enforcement, intelligence, and financial ac- tivities in the global fight against terrorism. Multilateral and regional organizations are also a key plat- form for developing broad international support for the adoption and implementation of policies, strategies, and “best practices” in combating terrorism and financing of terrorist activities. The Department of State works actively with foreign governments to urge adoption of all 12 inter- national counterterrorism conventions, as well as adherence to and implementation of UNSCR 1373, which imposes binding obligations on all states to suppress and prevent terrorist financing, improve their border controls, enhance information sharing and law enforcement coop- eration, suppress terrorist recruitment, and deny terrorists safe haven. Antiterrorism Assistance Program Ambassador J. Cofer Black, former US State Department Coordinator Congress authorized the Antiterrorism Assistance (ATA) Pro- for Counterterrorism, during a news conference at the IV Regular gram in 1983 as part of a major initiative against international Session of the Organization of American States Inter-American terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Print Page As PDF
    MENU Policy Analysis / Muqawama Fake News Surrounding Qasim Muslih’s Arrest (Part 2): Release Claims by Michael Knights, Crispin Smith, Hamdi Malik May 28, 2021 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Michael Knights Michael Knights is the Boston-based Jill and Jay Bernstein Fellow of The Washington Institute, specializing in the military and security affairs of Iraq, Iran, and the Persian Gulf states. Crispin Smith Crispin Smith is an associate at a Washington-based national security law group. His research focuses on Iraqi security, human rights, and law of armed conflict issues. Hamdi Malik Dr. Hamdi Malik is an Associate Fellow with the Washington Institute, specializing in Shia militias. He is the co-founder of the Militia Spotlight platform, which offers in-depth analysis of developments related to the Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and Syria. He is the coauthor of the Institute's 2020 study "Honored, Not Contained: The Future of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces." Brief Analysis Part of a series: Militia Spotlight or see Part 1: How to Use Militia Spotlight Militias made a concerted effort to create the false impression that their colleague had been released immediately, and the claim was soon echoed by major global media outlets. n May 26, the Iraqi state arrested militia leader Qasim Muslih in connection with the May 9 murder of activist O Ehab al-Wazni. In June 2020, when fourteen Kataib Hezbollah (KH) members were arrested and thirteen suspects not covered by the warrant were quickly released, muqawama (resistance) groups were able to badly damage the Iraqi government’s credibility by publicizing the release.
    [Show full text]
  • Indien – China – USA: Das Neue Mächtedreieck Asiens
    Indien – China – USA: Das neue Mächtedreieck Asiens Heinrich Kreft1 1 Die Entstehung eines neuen Mächtedreiecks in Asien seit Ende des Kalten Krieges Das Ende des Kalten Krieges führte nicht nur in Europa zu erheblichen politischen Veränderungen und Machtverschiebungen, sondern auch in Asien. Hinzu kam, dass zeitgleich mehrere Länder und Regionen Asiens einen beispiellosen wirtschaftlichen Boom erlebten. 1.1 Der Untergang der Sowjetunion Der wichtigste Einzelfaktor für die Veränderung der politischen Landschaft in Asien war der Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion und das sich daran anschließende Schwin- den des russischen Einflusses in Südasien. Die UdSSR war lange Zeit der wichtigste Verbündete Indiens gewesen, festgeschrieben im indisch-sowjetischen Vertrag von 1971, in dem Moskau Indiens Schutz garantierte. Allerdings wurde dieses Abkom- men bereits Ende der 1980er-Jahre durch die Bemühungen Gorbatschows unter- höhlt, die sowjetischen Beziehungen zu China zu verbessern. Die Russische Förde- ration als Rechtsnachfolger der Sowjetunion war Anfang der 1990er-Jahre kaum noch in der Lage, den sowjetischen Einfluss in Südasien aufrecht zu erhalten. Der ökonomische Niedergang Moskaus ging auch nach dem Zusammenbruch der UdSSR weiter, die russische Marine war nie in der Lage, die Rolle ihrer sowjeti- schen Vorgängerin im Indischen Ozean zu übernehmen. Die indisch-russischen Beziehungen laborieren auch heute noch an den Folgen der Auflösung der Sowjetunion, mit der Indien seinen bis dahin wichtigsten politi- schen und auch ökonomischen Partner verloren
    [Show full text]
  • Christmas Presents (1)” of the Robert T
    The original documents are located in Box 15, folder “President - Christmas Presents (1)” of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 15 of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASJ:iiNCJTOM .) 'lr1/f<1 Mr. Hartmann: .f f·' J*f<vj Dorothy says the ~r~sidentJ wants these letters out TODAY if the letter meets your approval. Dorothy has ordered the additional calculators. Should Congressman McFall also receive one? ~eta i ,9-_/J ~;'1 t/ cz ·. { 0 r . ll"3L\D . - 3501 . 531 OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT WASHINGTON, D.C. From the President: To: a.m. p.m. Dear ~~~~~~~~~~ On my recent trip to the Far East, I just had to squeeze in enough personal time in a very tight schedule, to allow me to find this little Christmas gift and souvenir of Japan for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth in the Information Age
    Beuth Hochschule für Technik Berlin Sprachenpreis 2019 Truth in the Information Age - Dead or Just Hidden? By Miriam Werner Theater- und Veranstaltungstechnik und -management 20.09.2019 Introduction Pokémon Go, iPhone 7, Donald Trump, Prince and Powerball. Those were the top five Google searches in 2016.1 Although it is hard to get a specific number from Google, it is estimated that Google handles more than two trillion searches per year. When doing the math that makes more than 63,000 searches per second.2 With numbers like these, you can see how important it is for us to gather information and with the right tools we have 24/7 access as well. If it didn’t matter what sort of information we receive, then everything would be fine. But in the era where expressions like “fake news” seem to pop up everywhere, the question seems to arise whether anything we read is true, or better yet, “is truth dead in the information age?” To fully understand all the nuances of this question a few definitions are required. When looking at the expression “information age” it refers to a period of time starting at the end of the 20th century and continuing into the foreseeable future. It is the change from the industrial to the post-industrial society where a large portion of the economy lies in information technology. It is shaped by the invention of the computer and telecommunication thereby changing how information is spread, managed and saved. 3 For this essay, I will be referring to the last three to four decades that include the invention of the internet, allowing information to travel around the world in seconds as well as offering access to more people than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Re: Request Under Freedom of Information Act (Expedited Processing Requested)
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION I August 14, 2015 Ms. Michele Meeks Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Mr. Paul Jacobsmeyer OSD/JS FOIA Requester Service Center Office of Freedom of Information Department of Defense 1155 Defense Pentagon, Room 2C757 Washington, D.C. 20301-1155 Ms. Sheryl L. Walter Director, Office of Information Programs and Services AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES U.S. Department of State UNION FOUNDATION Building SA-2 NATIONAL OFFICE 515 22nd Street, NW 125 BROAD STR EE T, 18TH FL NEW YORK , N Y 10004-2400 Washington, D.C. 20522-8100 T/21 2 549.2500 WWW.ACLU ORG Carmen L. Mallon Chief of Staff Office of Information Policy Department of Justice Suite 11050 1425 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Melissa Golden Lead Paralegal and FOIA Specialist Office of Legal Counsel Room 5511, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Request Under Freedom of Information Act (Expedited Processing Requested) To Whom It May Concern: The American Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation (together, the "ACLU")1 submit this Freedom of 1 The American Civil Liberties Union is a non-profit, 26 U.S.C. § 50l(c)(4) membership organization that educates the public about the civil liberties implications of pending and proposed state and federal legislation, provides analysis of pending and proposed legislation, directly lobbies legislators, and mobilizes its members to lobby their legislators. The American Civil Liberties
    [Show full text]