Campus Map, New York University, Washington Square Campus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cooper Square Committee Chrono
Cooper Square Committee Chrono A listing of Cooper Square events and activities - including victories and defeats - from March 1959 through March 2005. Prepared by: Walter Thabit, March, 2005 Planners Network Cooper Square Committee Municipal Art Society 61 East 4thStreet Planning Center New York, NY 10003 212 228-8210 COOPER SQUARE CHRONOLOGY The Cooper Square Chronology was initiated by Thelma Burdick in March, 1959, and recorded significant events up to March, 1968. For years, it was the bible of the organization, allowing us to keep the important dates straight. Unfortunately, it has never been updated till now, and it might still be waiting to happen if there hadn't been a renewed interest in the Cooper Square story. Writers and advocate planners have interviewed old timers like myself and Frances Goldin, and after hearing of an interesting incident, then ask, "And what year was that?" Too often I didn't have a clue. So I finally decided to bring the chronology up-to-date. It has been hard work, but worth every minute. I'm not the only contributor to a chronology of events. Marci Reaven, doing a PhD. dissertation on Cooper Square has also put one together for her personal use, and I have used it to fill out some uncertain items as well as a few whose significance I missed. Also, Valerio Orselli, Cooper Square's Director for over 20 years prepared a specialized chronology of 40 membership meetings held around the issue of the rehabilitation program, the Mutual Housing Association, and the revised Cooper Square Plan. It is included here, starting in November, 1984, running through April, 1993. -
85 Sullivan Street, Borough of Manhattan
October 27, 2020 Name of Landmark Building Type of Presentation Month xx, year Public Meeting The current proposal is: Preservation Department – Item 2, LPC-19-35736 85 Sullivan Street, Borough of Manhattan Note: this is a Public Meeting item. No public testimony will be received today as the hearing on this item is closed 1 85 Sullivan Street, New York, NY Presentation to Landmarks Preservation Commission 24 September 2019 revised 27 October 2020 2 Sullivan-Thompson Historic District 85 SULLIVAN ST 85 Sullivan Street, New York NY 3 Sullivan Street between Spring and Broome Streets, east Spring 200 Spring Street 85 83 81 79 77 75 71 69 67 65 63 61 59 57 55 Broome Street Sullivan (built in 2013) Sullivan Street Street Street 85 Sullivan Street, New York NY 4 85 Sullivan Street: Historic Photos 1940 1980 2018 85 Sullivan Street, New York NY 5 Typical Federal Characteristics 25 Harrison Street, 1804 (formerly 314 Washington Street) 37 Charlton Street, 1820s 77 Bedford Street, 1799 Individual Landmark, designated 1969 Charlton-King-Vandam Historic District, designated 1966 Greenwich Village Historic District, designated 1965 Typical historical characteristics: Typical historical characteristics: Typical historical characteristics: • Red brick • White painted windows • Red brick • Modest decoration • Light colored door trim and cornice • Modest decoration • Six over six windows • Contrasting dark parinted wood shutters and door • Six over six windows • Brownstone window and door details • Brownstone window details • Painted wood door trim -
Bowery - Houston - Bleecker Transportation Study (Congestion Analysis)
Bowery - Houston - Bleecker Transportation Study (Congestion Analysis) Technical Memorandum No. 1 - Existing Conditions P.I.N. PTDT11D00.H07 DRAFT December 2011 Bowery – Houston - Bleecker Transportation Study Technical Memorandum No. 1 Existing Conditions PTDT11D00.H07 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FTA) through the New York State Department of transportation and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council. This document is disseminated by the New York City of transportation in the interest of information exchange. It reflects the views of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented. The report does not necessarily reflect any official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, the federal Highway Administration or the State of New York. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. Prepared by: New York City Department of Transportation Janette Sadik-Khan, Commissioner Lori Ardito, First Deputy Commissioner Gerard Soffian, Deputy Commissioner Ryan Russo, Assistant Commissioner Margaret Forgione, Manhattan Borough Commissioner Naim Rasheed, Project Director Michael Griffith, Deputy Project Director Harvey LaReau, Project Manager Hilary Gietz, Principal Administrative Assistant Joe Li, City Planner Ali Jafri, Highway Transportation Specialist Milorad Ubiparip, Highway Transportation Specialist Eva Marin, Highway Transportation Specialist Table of Contents S.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY S.1 Introduction S.2 Demographics S.3 Zoning and Land Use S.4 Traffic and Transportation S.5 Public Transportation S.6 Parking S.7 Pedestrians and Bicycles S.8 Accidents/Safety S.9 Goods Movements S.10 Public Participation 1. -
Report: Federal Houses Landmarked Or Listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places 1999
GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION Making the Case Federal Houses Landmarked or Listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places 1999-2016 The many surviving Federal houses in Lower Manhattan are a special part of the heritage of New York City. The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation has made the documentation and preservation of these houses an important part of our mission. This report highlights the Society’s mission in action by showing nearly one hundred fifty of these houses in a single document. The Society either proposed the houses in this report for individual landmark designation or for inclusion in historic districts, or both, or has advocated for their designation. Special thanks to Jiageng Zhu for his efforts in creating this report. 32 Dominick Street, built c.1826, landmarked in 2012 Federal houses were built between ca. 1790 to ca. 1835. The style was so named because it was the first American architectural style to emerge after the Revolutionary War. In elevation and plan, Federal Period row houses were quite modest. Characterized by classical proportions and almost planar smoothness, they were ornamented with simple detailing of lintels, dormers, and doorways. These houses were typically of load bearing masonry construction, 2-3 stories high, three bays wide, and had steeply pitched roofs. The brick facades were laid in a Flemish bond which alternated a stretcher and a header in every row. All structures in this report were originally built as Federal style houses, though -
New York University Bulletin
New York University Bulletin Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development New York University Washington Square New York, New York 10003 NOTICES About this Bulletin The policies, requirements, course offerings, schedules, activities, tuition, fees, and calendar of the school and its departments and programs set forth in this bulletin are subject to change without notice at any time at the sole discretion of the administration. Such changes may be of any nature, including, but not limited to, the elimination of the school or college, programs, classes, or activities; the relocation of or modification of the content of any of the foregoing; and the cancellation of scheduled classes or other academic activities. Payment of tuition or attendance at any classes shall constitute a student’s acceptance of the administration ‘s rights as set forth herein. Fieldwork Placement Advisory Be advised that fieldwork placement facilities that provide training required for your program degree, and agencies that issue licenses for practice in your field of study, each may require you to undergo general and criminal background checks, the results of which the facility or agency must find accept able before it will allow you to train at its facility or issue you a license. You should inform yourself of offenses or other facts that may prevent you from obtaining a license to practice in your field of study. NYU Steinhardt will not be responsible if you are unable to complete program requirements or cannot obtain a license to practice in your field because of the results of such background checks. Some fieldwork placement facilities in your field of study may not be available to you in some states due to local legal prohibitions. -
Manchester United Training Session Key Information Sheet
Manchester United Training Session Key Information Sheet Date/Time - July 30th at 10:30AM Location - East River 6th Street Park in lower Manhattan located at 6th and the FDR. - There is no parking at the event. - The Soccer Field is located at 6th Street and the FDR, between a baseball field (north) and field under renovation (south). Event Schedule - The gate opens at 10:00AM. - The event starts promptly at 10:30AM with a Manchester United 1 hour training session followed by a: 45 clinic. - The event ends at 12:30PM. Event Passes - There is a limited supply of passes and they are first come, first served so place your order early - This is an invite only event and you will be required to show your pass at the South Gate of the park for entrance into the event. - After we receive your Pass Request Form, you will receive an email or call from MKTG.partners to confirm pass availability and let you know when you will receive your passes. - Your passes will be mailed to you. - Passes cannot be picked up at the park. Rules - No food/drink/coolers allowed. - There will be food concessions at the event. JULY 30TH MANCHESTER UNITED TRAINING SESSION PASS FORM To order your passes, please fill out this form completely and neatly and fax to 212.253.1625, Attn: Manchester United Training Session. Passes are free and first come, first served. You need the pass for entry into the event. Don t delay because there s only a limited supply. Organization Name: Contact Name: Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: Phone Number: Email Address: Number of Passes Requested: Tickets will be mailed via overnight courier. -
ST. MARK's HISTORIC DISTRICT, Borough of Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission January 14, 1969, Calendar No. I LP-0450 ST. MARK'S HISTORIC DISTRICT, Borough of Manhattan. The property bounded by tho western property I ine of 21 Stuyvesant Street, Stuyvesant Street, the western property I inG of 42 Stuyvesant Street the rear lot I ines of 42 and 44 Stuyvesant Street, the eastern property I ines of 44 and 46 Stuyvesant Street, Second Avenue, East I Ith Street, the western property I ine of 232 East 11th Street, a portion of the rear lot I ine of 129 East 10th Street the rear lot I ine of 127 East 10th Street, <i portion of the western property I i~e of 127 East 10th Street, the rear lot I ines of 125 through 109 East 10th Street, the western ~roperty lino of 109 East 10th Street, East 10th Street, the western prop erty line of 106 East 10th Street, and the rear lot I ines of 106 East 10th Street to the western property I inc of 21 Stuyvesant Street. Om April 12, 1966, the Landmarks Preservation Commission hold a public hearing on the proposed designation of the St. Mark's Historic District (Item No. 32). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. In recent years, a great deal of effort has gone Into the rehabilitation of. this area, and many residents and property owners there have urged the Commission to make this designation. Supporters of the proposed designation include St. -
151 Canal Street, New York, NY
CHINATOWN NEW YORK NY 151 CANAL STREET AKA 75 BOWERY CONCEPTUAL RENDERING SPACE DETAILS LOCATION GROUND FLOOR Northeast corner of Bowery CANAL STREET SPACE 30 FT Ground Floor 2,600 SF Basement 2,600 SF 2,600 SF Sub-Basement 2,600 SF Total 7,800 SF Billboard Sign 400 SF FRONTAGE 30 FT on Canal Street POSSESSION BASEMENT Immediate SITE STATUS Formerly New York Music and Gifts NEIGHBORS 2,600 SF HSBC, First Republic Bank, TD Bank, Chase, AT&T, Citibank, East West Bank, Bank of America, Industrial and Commerce Bank of China, Chinatown Federal Bank, Abacus Federal Savings Bank, Dunkin’ Donuts, Subway and Capital One Bank COMMENTS Best available corner on Bowery in Chinatown Highest concentration of banks within 1/2 mile in North America, SUB-BASEMENT with billions of dollars in bank deposits New long-term stable ownership Space is in vanilla-box condition with an all-glass storefront 2,600 SF Highly visible billboard available above the building offered to the retail tenant at no additional charge Tremendous branding opportunity at the entrance to the Manhattan Bridge with over 75,000 vehicles per day All uses accepted Potential to combine Ground Floor with the Second Floor Ability to make the Basement a legal selling Lower Level 151151 C anCANALal Street STREET151 Canal Street NEW YORKNew Y |o rNYk, NY New York, NY August 2017 August 2017 AREA FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/BRANCH DEPOSITS SUFFOLK STREET CLINTON STREET ATTORNEY STREET NORFOLK STREET LUDLOW STREET ESSEX STREET SUFFOLK STREET CLINTON STREET ATTORNEY STREET NORFOLK STREET LEGEND LUDLOW -
New York University NYU CORE Campus Development
DASNY (Dormitory Authority State of New York) STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW FINDINGS STATEMENT Pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), codified at Article 8 of the New York Environmental Conservation Law (“ECL”), and its implementing regulations, promulgated at Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations (“N.Y.C.R.R.”), which collectively contain the requirements for the State Environmental Quality Review (“SEQR”) process, DASNY (“Dormitory Authority State of New York”), as an involved agency, makes the following findings. Date: April 9, 2018 Title of Action: New York University NYU CORE Campus Development Description of Proposed Action and Proposed Project DASNY (“Dormitory Authority State of New York”) has been requested by New York University (“NYU” or the “University”) to provide funding for its NYU CORE Campus Development (“the Proposed Project”). For the purposes of SEQR, the Proposed Action would consist of DASNY’s authorization of the issuance of one or more series of fixed- and/or variable-rate, tax-exempt and/or taxable Series 2018 Bonds pursuant to DASNY’s Independent Colleges and Universities Program in an amount not to exceed $790,000,000 with maturities not to exceed 40 years to be sold at one or more times through a negotiated offering and/or a private placement on behalf of the University. The proceeds of the bond issuance would be used, in part, to finance the NYU CORE Campus Development project, as described and analyzed in this Findings Statement. The specific component to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2018 Bond issue would consist of the construction of a mixed-use building at 181 Mercer Street (referred to as the “Zipper Building”) that will include a modern athletic facility, new classrooms, performing arts space, and student and faculty housing. -
Chapter 9: Neighborhood Character
Chapter 9: Neighborhood Character A. INTRODUCTION As defined by the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, neighborhood character is considered to be a combination of the many elements that creates each neighborhood’s distinct personality. These elements include land use, urban design, visual resources, historic resources, socioeconomics, traffic, and noise, as well as the other physical or social characteristics that help to describe the community. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, an assessment of neighborhood character is generally needed when the action would exceed preliminary thresholds in any one of the following areas of technical analysis: land use, urban design and visual resources, historic resources, socioeconomic conditions, transportation, or noise. An assessment is also appropriate when the action would have moderate effects on several of the aforementioned areas. Potential effects on neighborhood character may include: • Land Use. Development resulting from a proposed action could alter neighborhood character if it introduced new land uses, conflicts with land use policy or other public plans for the area, changes land use character, or generates significant land use impacts. • Socioeconomic Conditions. Changes in socioeconomic conditions have the potential to affect neighborhood character when they result in substantial direct or indirect displacement or addition of population, employment, or businesses; or substantial differences in population or employment density. • Historic Resources. When an action would result in substantial direct changes to a historic resource or substantial changes to public views of a resource, or when a historic resource analysis identified a significant impact in this category, there is a potential to affect neighborhood character. • Urban Design and Visual Resources. -
Download World Class Streets
World Class Streets: Remaking New York City’s Public Realm CONTENTS 2 Letter from the Mayor 3 Letter from Commissioner 6 World Class Streets: Remaking New York City‘s Public Realm 14 How Do People Use New York Streets? 36 New York City‘s World Class Streets Program 53 Acknowledgments 54 Additional Resources and Contacts 1 New York City Department of Transportation LETTER from ThE MAYOR Dear Friends: In 2007, our Administration launched PlaNYC, our Finally, it’s no accident that New York City’s merchant long term plan to create a greener, greater New York. communities focus heavily on streetscape quality One of the challenges PlaNYC poses to city agencies is through their local Business Improvement Districts, to “re-imagine the City’s public realm”—to develop an which we have worked hard to expand and support. For urban environment that transforms our streets and storefront businesses, welcoming, attractive streets can squares into more people-friendly places. spell the difference between growth and just getting by. With 6,000 miles of City streets under its Today, our Administration is dramatically extending the management, the Department of Transportation is on streetscape improvements that many organizations have the front line of this effort—and it is succeeding in been able to create locally. spectacular fashion. New York has the most famous streets in the world. Through new initiatives such as Broadway Boulevard, Now, we’re working to make them the most attractive the Public Plaza Program, Coordinated Street Furniture, streets in the world for walking and cycling—and that and Summer Streets, we are finding creative new ways other great New York sport, people-watching. -
1 State of New York City of Yonkers 2 ------X 3 Minutes of the City of Yonkers Planning Board 4 May 13, 2020 - 5:37 P.M
Page 1 1 STATE OF NEW YORK CITY OF YONKERS 2 -------------------------------------------------X 3 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF YONKERS PLANNING BOARD 4 MAY 13, 2020 - 5:37 P.M. 5 at 6 VIRTUAL HEARING 7 DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC 8 --------------------------------------------------X 9 10 B E F O R E: 11 ROMAN KOZICKY, CHAIRMAN MACKENZIE FORSBERG, MEMBER 12 GENE JOHNSON, MEMBER ADELIA LANDI, MEMBER 13 JOHN LARKIN, MEMBER 14 15 P R E S E N T: 16 LEE ELLMAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR 17 CHRISTINE CARNEY, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ALAIN NATCHEV, ASSISTANT CORP. COUNSEL 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Diamond Reporting 877.624.3287 A Veritext Company www.veritext.com Proceedings Page 2 1 I N D E X 2 ITEM: PAGE: 3 2. Steve Accinelli - 70 Salisbury Road (Held) 5 4 3. Janet Giris - 555 Tuckahoe Road (Held) 6 5 6 4. Tom Abillama - 1969 Central Park Avenue 6 7 5. Janet Giris - Alexander, Babcock, Water Grant 56 8 9 6. Andrew Romano - 2 Lamatine Terrace 13 10 7. Referral from Yonkers City Council Amendment 17 11 To Chapter 43 Article XV (AHO) 12 8. David Steinmetz - 189 South Broadway 31 13 14 9. Janet Giris - 21 Scarsdale Road 60 15 10. James Wilson - 679 Warburton Avenue 76 16 17 11. Steven Accinelli - Prospect, B Vista, Hawthorne 76 (Held) 18 19 12. Stephen Grosso - 220-236 Warburton Avenue 85 20 13. Correspondence N/A 21 22 23 24 25 Diamond Reporting 877.624.3287 A Veritext Company www.veritext.com Proceedings Page 3 1 THE CHAIRMAN: Okay, this is a regular 2 meeting of the City of Yonkers Planning Board pursuant 3 to Governor Cuomo's Executive Order 202.1.