DOCSLIB.ORG

Dolphin Union Caribou Management Plan – January 11 - 13, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Submission to the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board FOR DECISION Issue: Request for approval of the proposed final Management Plan for the Dolphin and Union Caribou in Canada Background: To develop the management plan, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) and Government of Nunavut (GN) held a co-management partners joint meeting in Kugluktuk in March 2015 (Appendix I), and in Cambridge Bay in January 2016 (Appendix II). Additional meetings were held via teleconference in 2015 and 2016 to draft and review specific parts of the plan and to receive additional input on the threats calculator portion of the document. ECCC does not have jurisdiction for managing the harvest of Dolphin and Union caribou. Therefore, ECCC will adopt the joint management plan, with the exception of the harvest management portion which will be left to the GN and GNWT for implementation in their respective jurisdiction. Community consultations on the draft management plan were conducted in April 2016; it was presented to the Ekaluktutiak and Kugluktuk Hunters and Trappers Organizations (HTOs) and the communities. ECCC, GNWT and GN amalgamated the feedback into a comment table (Appendix III), and reviewed and/or incorporated comments into the draft management plan. ECCC emailed the comment table to HTOs on June 6, 2016 to ensure the comments captured in the meetings were correct. ECCC followed up with phone calls HTOs about table comments, but did not receive responses from the HTOs. ECCC, GNWT and GN updated the table to show how comments were reviewed and/or incorporated into the document and send the table back to HTOs. The first jurisdictional technical review of the draft recovery document was conducted from June 3 to July 8, 2016. ECCC sent the document to the NWMB on June 3, 2016, while the GN sent the document to the HTOs. ECCC did not receive any responses about the draft, but the GN received comments from the Ekaluktutiak HTO. ECCC, Page 1 of 3 The Species at Risk Act and You GNWT and GN worked together to review comments received from other jurisdictions and incorporated them into the recovery document if necessary. The second jurisdictional technical review of the proposed management plan was conducted from September 2 to October 7, 2016. ECCC sent the document to the NWMB on September 2, while the GN sent the document to HTOs. ECCC, GNWT and GN worked together to review comments received during this process and incorporated them into the recovery document. ECCC posted the proposed document from March 30 to May 29, 2017, on the Species at Risk Public Registry for a 60-day public comment period. ECCC sent the document to the HTOs, NTI and NWMB. ECCC sent a questionnaire asking for approval of the proposed document to the Kugluktuk and Ekaluktutiak HTOs, and neither raised objections. ECCC, GNWT and GN considered the minor comments received during the 60-day public comment period and revised the document in June and July 2017. Figure 1. Current range of Dolphin and Union Caribou in NU and NT. Page 2 of 3 The Species at Risk Act and You Next Steps: This briefing is the notification of the results of the consultations and accommodation based on consultation record on the recovery document in Nunavut. ECCC is now prepared to post the recovery documeent on the SSpecies at Risk Public Registry as final. ECCC and the GN are providing the recovery document to the NWMB for final approval decision as per the NLCA s. 5.2.34 Recommendation: That the NWMB considers whether or not they approve the proposed final Management Plan for the Barren-ground Caribou (Rangifer taranddus groenlandicus), Dolphin and Union population, in Canada: Adoption of the Management Plan for the Dolphin and Union Caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus x pearyi) in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut under the federal Species at Risk Act as per the NLCA s. 5.2.34. © K. Poole Prepared by: Dawn Andrews, Species at Risk Biologist Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Yellowknife, NT Phone: 867‐669‐4767 June 30, 2017 Page 3 of 3 SUBMISSION TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR Information: Decision: X Issue: Request a decision to approve or not the Dolphin and Union Management Plan titled “Management Plan for the Barren-ground Caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus), Dolphin and Union population, in Canada: Adoption of the Management Plan for the Dolphin and Union Caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus x pearyi) in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut”. Background The Dolphin and Union herd was assessed as a Species of Special Concern by Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) in 2004, up- listed under part 4 of Schedule 1 of the federal Species at Risk Act in 2011 (SARA) and on the Northwest Territories List of Species at Risk as a species of “special concern” in 2014. With the recent assessment by COSEWIC, threats facing Dolphin and Union classified them as high-very high (based on- IUCN-CMP unified threats classifications system), which put a strong emphasis to increase the monitoring effort on the Dolphin and Union herd and the much needed development of a management plan for the herd. Dumond and Lee (2007) estimated the extrapolated population of Dolphin and Union caribou at 27,787 ± 7,537 (95% CI), and the same analysis was applied to the 1997 estimates resulting in a revised extrapolated estimate of 34,558 ± 6,801 (95% CI) caribou. The 2015 extrapolated population of Dolphin and Union Caribou was estimated at 18,413 ± 6,795 caribou (95% CI). This estimate shows signs of decline relative to the 2007 survey estimates (z-test, Z=-2.19, p=0.036).There has been an overall decline of 33.8%, or 5% annually since 1997. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) must produce a federal management plan for the Dolphin and Union caribou under the federal Species At Risk Act. The Government of Northwest Territories (GNWT) is also required to develop a management plan under its Territorial Species at Risk Act. Since 2015, the Government of Nunavut, Department of Environment (GN-DOE), has committed to taking part in the development of the Dolphin and Union Management Plan. GN-DOE has participated actively and provided technical information and expertise into the management plan development process. 1 The Dolphin and Union Management Plan was drafted based on the input received from the co-management partners (HTOs, NTI, KRWB) during the first and second joint meetings, draft consultation, and two jurisdictions reviews to accommodate their comments. The Dolphin and Union Management Plan was developed upon a community-based management approach in consultation with all the communities that harvest from this caribou herds. There were two rounds of community and public engagements, consultations at different phase of the management plan development to assure active community participation and accommodation. Current Status The Government of Nunavut’s Department of Environment (DOE) has been working with communities, HTOs, KRWO, NTI and interjurisdictional co-management partners (Environment Canada, and Government of Northwest Territories) to develop a joint management plan for Dolphin and Union caribou herd. The first engagement teleconference call happened on February 18, 2015 ECCC does not have jurisdiction for managing the harvest of Dolphin and Union caribou in Nunavut. Therefore, the Government of Nunavut and the Government of NWT were responsible to develop the harvest management portion of the Dolphin and Union management plan and its submission to NWMB for approval. The harvest management recommendations are based on the population size (high, increasing, declining, and low), as well as taking in consideration other indicators such as recruitment, pregnancy rate, sex ratio. This harvest management is based on the population cycle, which recognized the Dolphin and Union herd being a small herd with an historic high agreed at 40,000 animals and where Inuit harvest restrictions might be considered when the herd falls to 20% of the high, below 8,000 animals. The Kugluktuk and Cambridge Bay HTO has already imposed voluntary management actions following discussion happen during the Management Plan consultation process: o Kugluktuk has a motion to suspend all caribou commercial and sport hunts. o Cambridge Bay HTO is reducing the number of tag allocating to sport hunt. o There is no commercial harvest of Dolphin and Union caribou herd in Nunavut. o Increase in educational and public awareness on the Dolphin and Union programs (HTOs and GN). The Department has engaged with and continues to work closely with the affected communities and respective co-management partners (NTI, HTOs, KRWB) and GNWT on management actions needed and to monitor the Dolphin and Union caribou herd. Consultations: 2 Face-to-face: February 18, 2015: Introductory meeting in Yellowknife and phone. Participants: Kugluktuk HTO, Umingmaktok HTO, Ekaluktutiak HTO, Gjoa Haven HTO, KRWB, NTI, ECCC and GN. March 25-27, 2015: First Joint Meeting in Kugluktuk (NU). Participants: Kugluktuk HTO, Ekaluktutiak HTO, KRWB, NTI, KIA, ECCC, and GN. (See Appendix I) October 26, 2015: Framework Review Teleconference. Participants: Burnside HTO, Ekaluktutiak HTO, KRWB, NTI, KIA, NWMB, ECCC, and GN January 11-13, 2016: Second Joint Meeting in Cambridge Bay (NU). Participants: Kugluktuk HTO, Burnside HTO, Ekaluktutiak HTO, KRWB, NTI, ECCC, and GN. (See Appendix II) February 8, 2016: Threat Calculator Exercise Teleconference. Participants: Ekaluktutiak HTO, KRWB, ECCC and GN. April 19, 2016: Draft Consultation with the Ekaluktutiak HTO and Community of Cambridge Bay. Participants: Ekaluktutiak HTO, Burnside HTO, ECCC and GN. April 28, 2016: Draft Consultation with the Kugluktuk HTO and Community of Kugluktuk. Participants: Kugluktuk HTO, ECCC and GN. Written: June 3, 2016: First jurisdictional technical review. Send the management plan to all HTOs September 2, 2016: Second jurisdictional technical review.
Recommended publications
  • Death and Life for Inuit and Innu

    Death and Life for Inuit and Innu

    skin for skin Narrating Native Histories Series editors: K. Tsianina Lomawaima Alcida Rita Ramos Florencia E. Mallon Joanne Rappaport Editorial Advisory Board: Denise Y. Arnold Noenoe K. Silva Charles R. Hale David Wilkins Roberta Hill Juan de Dios Yapita Narrating Native Histories aims to foster a rethinking of the ethical, methodological, and conceptual frameworks within which we locate our work on Native histories and cultures. We seek to create a space for effective and ongoing conversations between North and South, Natives and non- Natives, academics and activists, throughout the Americas and the Pacific region. This series encourages analyses that contribute to an understanding of Native peoples’ relationships with nation- states, including histo- ries of expropriation and exclusion as well as projects for autonomy and sovereignty. We encourage collaborative work that recognizes Native intellectuals, cultural inter- preters, and alternative knowledge producers, as well as projects that question the relationship between orality and literacy. skin for skin DEATH AND LIFE FOR INUIT AND INNU GERALD M. SIDER Duke University Press Durham and London 2014 © 2014 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ∞ Designed by Heather Hensley Typeset in Arno Pro by Copperline Book Services, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Sider, Gerald M. Skin for skin : death and life for Inuit and Innu / Gerald M. Sider. pages cm—(Narrating Native histories) Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978- 0- 8223- 5521- 2 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn 978- 0- 8223- 5536- 6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Naskapi Indians—Newfoundland and Labrador—Labrador— Social conditions.
  • Myth–Making and Identities Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, Vol 2

    Myth–Making and Identities Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, Vol 2

    The Idea of North Myth–Making and Identities Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, vol 2. Publisher: The Birch and the Star – Finnish Perspectives on the Long 19th Century ©The Birch and the Star and the authors. All rights reserved. Editors: Frances Fowle and Marja Lahelma Designer: Vilja Achté Cover illustration: Vilja Achté Helsinki 2019 ISBN: 978-952-94-1658-5 www.birchandstar.org Contents Preface Frances Fowle and Marja Lahelma 4 Introduction: Conceptualising the North at the Fin de Siècle Frances Fowle and Marja Lahelma 5 Sámi, Indigeneity, and the Boundaries of Nordic National Romanticism Bart Pushaw 21 Photojournalism and the Canadian North: Rosemary Gilliat Eaton’s 1960 Photographs of the Eastern Canadian Arctic Danielle Siemens 34 Quaint Highlanders and the Mythic North: The Representation of Scotland in Nineteenth Century Painting John Morrison 48 The North, National Romanticism, and the Gothic Charlotte Ashby 58 Feminine Androgyny and Diagrammatic Abstraction: Science, Myth and Gender in Hilma af Klint’s Paintings Jadranka Ryle 70 Contributors 88 3 This publication has its origins in a conference session and assimilations of the North, taking into consideration Preface convened by Frances Fowle and Marja Lahelma at the issues such as mythical origins, spiritual agendas, and Association for Art History’s Annual Conference, which notions of race and nationalism, tackling also those aspects took place at the University of Edinburgh, 7–9 April 2016. of northernness that attach themselves to politically sensitive Frances Fowle and The vibrant exchange of ideas and fascinating discussions issues. We wish to extend our warmest thanks to the authors during and after the conference gave us the impetus to for their thought-provoking contributions, and to the Birch continue the project in the form of a publication.
  • Visitor Guide Photo Pat Morrow

    Visitor Guide Photo Pat Morrow

    Visitor Guide Photo Pat Morrow Bear’s Gut Contact Us Nain Office Nunavik Office Telephone: 709-922-1290 (English) Telephone: 819-337-5491 Torngat Mountains National Park has 709-458-2417 (French) (English and Inuttitut) two offices: the main Administration Toll Free: 1-888-922-1290 Toll Free: 1-888-922-1290 (English) office is in Nain, Labrador (open all E-Mail: [email protected] 709-458-2417 (French) year), and a satellite office is located in Fax: 709-922-1294 E-Mail: [email protected] Kangiqsualujjuaq in Nunavik (open from Fax: 819-337-5408 May to the end of October). Business hours Mailing address: Mailing address: are Monday-Friday 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Torngat Mountains National Park Torngat Mountains National Park, Box 471, Nain, NL Box 179 Kangiqsualujjuaq, Nunavik, QC A0P 1L0 J0M 1N0 Street address: Street address: Illusuak Cultural Centre Building 567, Kangiqsualujjuaq, Nunavik, QC 16 Ikajutauvik Road, Nain, NL In Case Of Emergency In case of an emergency in the park, Be prepared to tell the dispatcher: assistance will be provided through the • The name of the park following 24 hour emergency numbers at • Your name Jasper Dispatch: • Your sat phone number 1-877-852-3100 or 1-780-852-3100. • The nature of the incident • Your location - name and Lat/Long or UTM NOTE: The 1-877 number may not work • The current weather – wind, precipitation, with some satellite phones so use cloud cover, temperature, and visibility 1-780-852-3100. 1 Welcome to TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Torngat Mountains National Park 1 Welcome 2 An Inuit Homeland The spectacular landscape of Torngat Mountains Planning Your Trip 4 Your Gateway to Torngat National Park protects 9,700 km2 of the Northern Mountains National Park 5 Torngat Mountains Base Labrador Mountains natural region.
  • Information in Support of the Identification of Ecologically

    Information in Support of the Identification of Ecologically

    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2018/027 Central and Arctic Region Information in Support of the Identification of Ecologically Significant Species, Functional Groups and Community Properties (ESSCP) in the Western Arctic Biogeographic Region D.G. Cobb1, S. MacPhee1, J. Paulic1, K. Martin1, V. Roy2, J. Reist1, C. Michel1, A. Niemi1, E. Richardson3, and A. Black4 1Fisheries and Oceans Canada Freshwater Institute 501 University Crescent Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N6 2Canadian Museum of Nature PO Box 3443, Station D Ottawa, ON, K1P6P4 3Environment and Climate Change Canada Eastgate Offices 9250 – 49th Street Edmonton, AB, T6B 1K5 4Environment and Climate Change Canada 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, ON, K1A 0H3 November 2020 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: Cobb, D.G., MacPhee, S., Paulic, J., Martin, K., Roy, V., Reist, J., Michel, C., Niemi, A., Richardson, E., and Black, A. 2020. Information in Support of the Identification of Ecologically Significant Species, Functional Groups and Community Properties (ESSCP) in the Western Arctic Biogeographic Region. DFO Can.
  • Canada & the North 2009

    Canada & the North 2009

    Canada & The North 2009 Featuring the Canadian Arctic, Greenland, Labrador & Newfoundland Adventure Canada 14 Front St S, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5H 2C4 | 1-800-363-7566 www.AdventureCanada.com | [email protected] © Larry Dear Adventurers, Adventure Canada’s Canadian itineraries continue to draw enthusiastic praise from audiences from around the world and the proposed schedule for 2009 will be no exception. Our voyages explore the northern and eastern most reaches of our country dropping into friendly communities and witnessing vast space and grandeur. Five voyages explore six unique and vibrant re- gions, Greenland, Nunavut, Nunavik, Nunatsiavut, Newfoundland and Labrador. Throughout the course of our programming we will examine the people, the geography and the cultural richness of each different region. 2009 is a year of note and of special significance for Arctic travellers. It marks the 10th anniversary of the creation of Nunavut – the newest Canadian territory. Woven into the fabric of our programming will be an examination of the Territory, its objectives & achievements thus far. A key element will be the increased visibility of Inuit stewardship of the land including issues of global warming, hunting and wildlife conservation. We are fortunate to have a number of Inuit resource staff who have experienced this transition period and who can share their insights as we make our way through the famed Northwest Passage. Along the coast of Labrador next year, Adventure Canada is thrilled to present a new concept in expeditionary cruising. Our Atlantic Arts Float will, in addition to our usual resource staff compliment, have additional writers, photographers, artists and musicians.
  • North America

    North America

    World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization edited by Dan Hicks and Alice Stevenson, Archaeopress 2013, page 409-454 20 North America Dan Hicks and Michael D. Petraglia 20.1 Introduction On entering the main entrance of the Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) and descending the stairs into the Court, the visitor comes face-to-face with a central display case titled ‘Pottery from North America’.1 Looking down on the case and the visitor, the 11-metre high Haida House Pole stands against the east wall of the Museum (1901.39.1). But as well as these iconic Native American objects, the PRM holds a wide, varied collection of ethnographic, photographic and archaeological material from North America, some of which is displayed in the galleries, but most of which is held in storerooms. The archaeological collections come from across the United States, Canada and Greenland, from the Canadian Arctic to the southwestern deserts of the USA, and they span the entire length of the Holocene, from the Palaeoindian period and into the colonial period. There are c. 4,930 objects recorded as from North America that are currently defined as ‘archaeological’. Of these, c. 3,627 are from the USA (Table 20.1), c. 720 from Canada (Table 20.2), and c. 125 from Greenland. The remaining 435 objects are currently recorded only as ‘North America’, although further documentary research (especially for those objects transferred from the Ashmolean Museum) may provide further detail for these objects. As with other chapters, the definition of what might count as ‘archaeological’ or ‘ethnographic’ (and what has done in the past) is far from clear-cut.
  • Paper 64-35 a Provisional Physiographic Map of Canada

    Paper 64-35 a Provisional Physiographic Map of Canada

    PAPER 64-35 A PROVISIONAL PHYSIOGRAPHIC MAP OF CANADA (Report and Map 13-1964) H. S. Bostock Price, 75 cents 1964 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA PAPER 64-35 A PROVISIONAL PHYSIOGRAPHIC MAP OF CANADA H. S. Bostock DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND TECHNICAL SURVEYS - iii - CONTENTS Page Introduction.... • • . • • . • . • • . • • . • • • . • • . • • • . l Physiographic subdivisions of Canada. • • • . • • . • . • l Shield Region . • • • . • • . • • • . • • • • . • . • • • . • . 5 Bear Province . • . • . • . • • • • . • • • • • • • • . 6 Slave Province • • • . • • • . • . • • . • • . • . • . 7 Churchill Provinces . • • . • • . • . 7 We stern Churchill Province ••.....• , • . • • • . 7 Northern Churchill Province . • . • . • • . • . • • • 9 Eastern Churchill Province . • • • • . • • • • . l 0 Superior Province . • • . • . • • . • . • • . • 12 Southern Province . • • . • • • . • • . • • • . • 14 Grenville Province . • . • • . • • . • • • . • • . 14 Border Region • . • • . • . • . • . • • • . • • • . 15 Innuitian Province • . • . • • . • • • . • . • • . 16 Arctic Lowland Province . • • . • . • • . • • • . 17 Arctic Coastal Plain Province . • . • . • • . • • 18 Cordilleran Province . • • . • • • . • • . • l 8 Interior Plains Province . • . • • • • . • • . 18 Hudson Bay Province • • . • • • . • • • . • 21 St. Lawrence Province . • . • . • . • • • . • . • . • • • • 21 Appalachian Province . • • . • • . • • . • . • . • • • 22 References................. • • • . • • . • • . • . • • • • • • • • . • 22 Map 13-1964 Provisional physiographic map of Canada .....••....••....••.......••..•
  • Core 1..246 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 16.25)

    Core 1..246 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 16.25)

    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 084 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, May 12, 2014 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 5171 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, May 12, 2014 The House met at 11 a.m. really done very little on that front, and we have relied on initiatives from the private sector or other levels of government. For example, one of the huge success stories in my own province Prayers is the Peak of the Market, which is an organization that has done exceptionally well in the province of Manitoba. It has provided educational advertising and a much higher sense of public awareness PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS because of its actions. Ï (1105) Peak of the Market contributes immensely to non-profit organizations and educates the population as a whole in terms of [English] the types of vegetables that they receive. Most importantly, not only does it promote good, quality product for the table, but it always PROMOTION OF LOCAL FOODS ACT provides a wonderful opportunity for farmers in Manitoba to The House resumed from March 27 consideration of the motion participate in a program, and working as a collective we are able to that Bill C-539, An Act to promote local foods, be read the second see that much more in terms of market share. This is critically time and referred to a committee. important, because it helps preserve the family farm and at the same time provides a world-class product.
  • Cultural Heritage Resources Report & Inventory

    Cultural Heritage Resources Report & Inventory

    Phase I: NTI IIBA for Cultural Heritage Resources Conservation Areas Report and Inventory Appedices Cultural Heritage Area: Queen Maud Gulf and Interpretative Migratory Bird Sanctuary Materials Study Prepared for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 1 May 2011 This report is part of a set of studies and a database produced for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. as part of the project: NTI IIBA for Conservation Areas, Cultural Resources Inventory and Interpretative Materials Study Inquiries concerning this project and the report should be addressed to: David Kunuk Director of Implementation Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 3rd Floor, Igluvut Bldg. P.O. Box 638 Iqaluit, Nunavut X0A 0H0 E: [email protected] T: (867) 975‐4900 Project Manager, Consulting Team: Julie Harris Contentworks Inc. 137 Second Avenue, Suite 1 Ottawa, ON K1S 2H4 Tel: (613) 730‐4059 Email: [email protected] Report Authors: Philip Goldring, Consultant: Historian and Heritage/Place Names Specialist (primary author) Julie Harris, Contentworks Inc.: Heritage Specialist and Historian Nicole Brandon, Consultant: Archaeologist Note on Place Names: The current official names of places are used here except in direct quotations from historical documents. Throughout the document Umingmaktok, for example, refers to the settlement previously known as Bay Chimo. Names of places that do not have official names will appear as they are found in the source documents. Contents Section 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................
  • Status Report and Assessment of Dolphin And

    Status Report and Assessment of Dolphin And

    SPECIES STATUS REPORT Dolphin and Union Caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus x pearyi) Barren-ground caribou (Dolphin and Union population) Kiilliniq caribou Island caribou Arctic-island caribou Mainland caribou Tuktu (Inuinnaqtun) Tuktu/tuktut (Siglitun) Tuttu (Ummarmiutun) caribou du tropeau Dolphin-et-Union in the Northwest Territories Special Concern December 2013 Status of Dolphin and Union Caribou in the NWT Species at Risk Committee status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of species suspected of being at risk in the Northwest Territories (NWT). Suggested citation: Species at Risk Committee. 2013. Species Status Report for Dolphin and Union Caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus x pearyi) in the Northwest Territories. Species at Risk Committee, Yellowknife, NT. © Government of the Northwest Territories on behalf of the Species at Risk Committee ISBN 978-0-7008-0211-0 Production note: The drafts of this report were prepared by Janet Winbourne and Kristi Benson (traditional and community knowledge component) and Anne Gunn and Kim G. Poole (scientific knowledge component), prepared under contract with the Government of the Northwest Territories, and edited by Joanna Wilson, Claire Singer, Michelle Henderson, and Kendra McGreish. For additional copies contact: Species at Risk Secretariat c/o SC6, Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Tel.: (855) 783-4301 (toll free) Fax.: (867) 873-0293 E-mail: [email protected] www.nwtspeciesatrisk.ca ABOUT THE SPECIES AT RISK COMMITTEE The Species at Risk Committee was established under the Species at Risk (NWT) Act. It is an independent committee of experts responsible for assessing the biological status of species at risk in the NWT.
  • A Catch History for Atlantic Walruses (Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus)

    A Catch History for Atlantic Walruses (Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus)

    A catch history for Atlantic walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus ) in the eastern Canadian Arctic D. Bruce Stewart 1,* , Jeff W. Higdon 2, Randall R. Reeves 3, and Robert E.A. Stewart 4 1 Arctic Biological Consultants, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3V 1X2, Canada * Corresponding author; Email: [email protected] 2 Higdon Wildlife Consulting, 912 Ashburn Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3G 3C9, Canada 3 Okapi Wildlife Associates, 27 Chandler Lane, Hudson, Quebec, J0P 1H0, Canada 5 501 University Crescent, Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Central and Arctic Region, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N6, Canada ABSTRACT Knowledge of changes in abundance of Atlantic walruses ( Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus ) in Canada is important for assessing their current population status. This catch history collates avail - able data and assesses their value for modelling historical populations to inform population recov - ery and management. Pre-historical (archaeological), historical (e.g., Hudson’s Bay Company journals) and modern catch records are reviewed over time by data source (whaler, land-based commercial, subsistence etc.) and biological population or management stock. Direct counts of walruses landed as well as estimates based on hunt products (e.g., hides, ivory) or descriptors (e.g., Peterhead boatloads) support a minimum landed catch of over 41,300 walruses in the eastern Canadian Arctic between 1820 and 2010, using the subsample of information examined. Little is known of Inuit catches prior to 1928, despite the importance of walruses to many Inuit groups for subsistence. Commercial hunting from the late 1500s to late 1700s extirpated the Atlantic walrus from southern Quebec and the Atlantic Provinces, but there was no commercial hunt for the species in the Canadian Arctic until ca.
  • Canada Lands - Atlantic First Nations Lands and National Parks

    Canada Lands - Atlantic First Nations Lands and National Parks

    73° 72° 71° 70° 69° 68° 67° 66° 65° 64° 63° 62° 61° 60° 59° 58° 57° 56° 55° 54° 53° 52° 51° 50° 49° 48° 47° 46° 60° 61° Natural Resources Canada 46° CANADA LANDS - ATLANTIC FIRST NATIONS LANDS AND NATIONAL PARKS Killiniq Island Produced by the Surveyor General Branch, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada. Fo rb December 2011 Edition. es Sou dley nd Cape Chi Cap William-Smith To order this product contact: 60° Grenfell Sound Surveyor General Branch, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada 59° et Tunnissugjuak Inl Atlantic Client Liaison Unit, Amherst, Nova Scotia, Telephone (902) 661-6762 or Home Island E-mail: [email protected] rd Avayalik Islands Fio For other related products from the Surveyor General Branch, see website sgb.nrcan.gc.ca yuk lia ud Black Rock Point 73° Ikk d ior Saglarsuk Bay © 2011. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Natural Resources Canada. k F eoo odl Eclipse Harbour No Cape Territok North Aulatsivik Island hannel Eclipse C Scale: 1:2 000 000 or one centimetre equals 20 kilometres Ryans Bay 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 kilometres Allu vi aq F Ungava Bay io rd ord lands Bay Lambert Conformal Conical Projection, Standard Parallels 49° N and 77° N iorvik\Fi Seven Is angalaks K 47° 59° Komaktorvik Fiord Cape White Handkerchief Trout Trap Fiord 58° TORNGAT MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA NOTE: Nachv iord a k F Gulch Cape This map is not to be used for defining boundaries. It is an index to First Nation Lands (Indian Reserves Rowsell Harbour as defined by the Indian Act) and National Parks.