DOCSLIB.ORG

Elections, Violence and Democracy in Iraq Shaheen Mozaffar Bridgewater State College, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elections, Violence and Democracy in Iraq Shaheen Mozaffar Bridgewater State College, Smozaffar@Bridgew.Edu Bridgewater Review Volume 25 | Issue 1 Article 6 Jun-2006 Elections, Violence and Democracy in Iraq Shaheen Mozaffar Bridgewater State College, [email protected] Recommended Citation Mozaffar, Shaheen (2006). Elections, Violence and Democracy in Iraq. Bridgewater Review, 25(1), 5-9. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol25/iss1/6 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Elections, Violence audience. I am sure you will enjoy Bill’s take on his travels in France and Democracy and his view of the French and French culture. in Iraq In the last few years Patti Fanning, Shaheen Mozaffar also of the Sociology Department, In 2005, Iraq held three successful national elections through one of Iraq’s holiest Shiite mosques in Samarra has come on board as Associate that were largely free and credible by accepted interna- on February 22, 2006, unleashing a paroxysm of retalia- Editor. Patti, brings not only her tional standards. On January 30, 58% of registered vot- tory sectarian attacks and pushing the country to the writing and editing skills to the ers went to the polls to elect the Transitional National brink of an all-out civil war. Review, but also her passion for Assembly (TNA), which wrote the new Constitution. local history, Irish studies and Iraq thus confronts a central challenge today: will its On October 15, 63% of registered voters turned out biography of Massachusetts political future be determined by the three resoundingly for the constitutional referendum to approve the new K luminaries. Her contributions successful elections held in 2005, or by the brutality and Constitution by an overwhelming margin of 79% to to the magazine have been read violence of terrorism, insurgency and sectarian conflict? NE 21%. And on December 15, 76% of registered voters A with great interest by our readers. This article answers this question through a systematic cast ballots to elect the 275-seat Council of Representa- In this issue Patti writes on the analysis and pragmatic assessment of the relationship YZ tives (COR), Iraq’s national legislature.1 R Missionary Sisters of Louisburg between elections and violence and its impact on the K Square, who were one of the first Holding three elections in one year is a daunting task prospects for democracy in Iraq. L E religious orders to minister to the even for established democracies, but it is an extraordi- THE THREE ELECTIONS African-Americans of Boston. nary feat for a country that is trying to establish a new Given the precarious security conditions caused by Patti is an Associate Editor who I democracy after three decades of tyranny while being ICHA militant insurgency and terrorist bombings, the three hope will remain with the Review wracked by terrorist bombings and violent insurgency. M Iraqi elections in 2005 were a resounding success. One for many years to come. The overall incidence and intensity of terrorist and in- factor contributing to Finally, Charles Angell, the mag- surgent attacks declined progressively on each Election this success was a rare azine’s book review editor, has Day, but the terrorists and insurgents posed an ever- manifestation of sound EVIEW present threat, intimidating, kidnapping and occasion- political judgment by R been with the Review from almost the beginning. Charlie has one of ally killing political candidates, voters, poll workers and the US when it relented the toughest jobs on the maga- election officials in the lead up to all three elections. on its initial refusal to zine—to comment on and critique the books that we members place their primary emphasis on teaching and The elections were important components of a larger allow a substantial role feel our readers need to know about. During his time as working with students, yet are so dedicated to their aca- political process designed to establish the institu- for the UN in Iraq and book review editor, Charlie has reviewed a wide range of demic disciplines that they are also scholars of the first tional and political foundations for democracy in Iraq agreed to an exclusive books from Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America to the degree, then there is no better place than Bridgewater. in the aftermath of the American-led invasion that UN role in assisting overthrew Saddam Hussein in March 2003. The COR the newly-established BRIDGEWATER BRIDGEWATER self-help manual Who Moved My Cheese to in this issue, If the Bridgewater Review has done anything over the American Vertigo, Bernard Levy’s acclaimed retracing of elections represented the final step in the formation of Independent Election last 25 years, I hope that it has been helpful in alerting Alexis de Tocqueville’s travels through America. Charlie a democratic government. But as Iraqi leaders wrangled Commission of Iraq THE the general public to the very special faculty who teach is one of the most thoughtful and erudite members of unsuccessfully over the choice of a new Prime Minister (IECI) in the organi- here. Happy Birthday Bridgewater Review, and to my fel- the faculty that I have had the pleasure of working with and the composition of the new government two zation and management of the three elections. This ING low faculty colleagues, thanks for being so special. over the years. months after the COR elections, a terrorist bomb ripped change in US policy, however, was due largely to the SH steadfast opposition of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, I As a senior member of the faculty I have been asked 1.In addition, approximately 300,000 Iraqi citizens living in 18 Iraq’s most revered Shiite religious leader and an astute on many occasions by prospective students and con- Michael Kryzanek countries across the world voted in January and December, but political strategist, to any US involvement in the elec- UBL cerned parents to tell them why they should choose Editor P not in October due to logistical constraints. Also, approximately tions because it would diminish the legitimacy of the Bridgewater State College. Of course the cost is quite 200,000 eligible voters incarcerated in prisons and deten- elections in the eyes of the Iraqis and the international attractive and the location close to home is a bonus as tion centers (under both Iraqi and US control, including the community, and to his uncompromising insistence on well. But I dwell on the faculty and give them a copy infamous Abu Ghraib prison), residing as patients in hospitals, an exclusive UN role in overseeing the elections. of the Bridgewater Review. I tell them that if their son and serving in the Iraqi police force and the military voted in EARS OF or daughter wants to go to a college where faculty The IECI, whose seven members and the Chief Electoral Y special one-day elections held prior to the regularly scheduled Officer were selected by the United Nations (UN), elections in October and December. It is not known whether 25 received the full range of organizational, technical Saddam Hussein, who was being held in a US detention center and logistical assistance that is now commonplace in and was an eligible voter, chose to exercise his franchise. For democracy promotion strategies from an International reasons of space, this article does not deal with these elections. BRIDGEWATER REVIEW JUNE 2006 5 Elections Assistance Team operating under the United In one poll, for instance, 91% of respondents favored The results in Table 2 approximate the broad sectar- January elections, but because he has a large following Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq and funded from a democracy over authoritarian rule, and 85% favored ian and ethnic divisions in Iraq, but these results also among the Shiite poor classes, he was reluctantly in- general UN fund facility with contributions from 25 democracy despite its manifest limitations.2 These obscure politically salient intra-sectarian and intra-eth- vited to join UIA for the December elections to ensure a countries, including the United States. This assistance figures also testify to the success of IECI’s new nation- nic, as well as ideological, differences within the major Shiite legislative majority after the Sunnis agreed to par- enabled the IECI to organize the three elections profes- wide security provisions and its special provisions in parties in the COR, all of which are actually coalitions ticipate in the COR elections. As the largest party in the sionally and execute them competently according to Anbar to help increase Sunni participation in October of groups representing these differences. The Kurdis- COR, the UIA has the constitutional authority to nomi- accepted international standards. and December. These provisions included: a three-ring tani Gathering, for instance, consists of two tradition- nate a candidate for Prime Minister for final approval by security perimeter around polling stations manned by ally antagonistic Kurdish parties – the Patriotic Union the COR. In the ensuing fight for the nomination, the Amidst escalating terrorist and insurgent attacks, the all-Iraqi security forces, backed with unobtrusive US of Kurdistan and the Kurdistan Democratic Party—and al-Sadrites’ control of 32 COR seats was indispensable IECI conducted a successful voter registration exercise military support, for three days before and after Election includes a moderate religious party. But the Kurds are in al-Jaafri’s unexpected victory by one vote over Adel in November 2004, registering 14.3 million voters, Day; coordination with local leaders, and even with also represented by the fundamentalist Islamic Union Abdel-Mahdi of SCIRI, who was supported by other which represented a substantial percentage of eligible some Sunni insurgents (via mediation by Sunni politi- of Kurdistan, with 5 COR seats.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blood and Ballots the Effect of Violence on Voting Behavior in Iraq
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Göteborgs universitets publikationer - e-publicering och e-arkiv DEPTARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BLOOD AND BALLOTS THE EFFECT OF VIOLENCE ON VOTING BEHAVIOR IN IRAQ Amer Naji Master’s Thesis: 30 higher education credits Programme: Master’s Programme in Political Science Date: Spring 2016 Supervisor: Andreas Bågenholm Words: 14391 Abstract Iraq is a very diverse country, both ethnically and religiously, and its political system is characterized by severe polarization along ethno-sectarian loyalties. Since 2003, the country suffered from persistent indiscriminating terrorism and communal violence. Previous literature has rarely connected violence to election in Iraq. I argue that violence is responsible for the increases of within group cohesion and distrust towards people from other groups, resulting in politicization of the ethno-sectarian identities i.e. making ethno-sectarian parties more preferable than secular ones. This study is based on a unique dataset that includes civil terror casualties one year before election, the results of the four general elections of January 30th, and December 15th, 2005, March 7th, 2010 and April 30th, 2014 as well as demographic and socioeconomic indicators on the provincial level. Employing panel data analysis, the results show that Iraqi people are sensitive to violence and it has a very negative effect on vote share of secular parties. Also, terrorism has different degrees of effect on different groups. The Sunni Arabs are the most sensitive group. They change their electoral preference in response to the level of violence. 2 Acknowledgement I would first like to thank my advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Monarchy As Antithetical Terms?: Iraq's Elections of September 1954 Bishop, Elizabeth
    www.ssoar.info Democracy and monarchy as antithetical terms?: Iraq's elections of September 1954 Bishop, Elizabeth Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bishop, E. (2013). Democracy and monarchy as antithetical terms?: Iraq's elections of September 1954. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 13(2), 313-326. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-447205 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Democracy and Monarchy as Antithetical Terms? 313 Democracy and Monarchy as Antithetical Terms? Iraq’s Elections of September 1954 ELIZABETH BISHOP Historian Bernard Lewis observes: ”Americans tend to see democracy and monarchy in antithetical terms; in Europe, however, democracy has fared better in constitutional monarchies than in republics”1. Let us take this opportunity to consider elections held in the Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq during the Cold War, in order to assess how”democracy” fared during the years that country was a constitutional monarchy. As we do so, let’s keep Saad Eskander’s words in mind: ”You cannot have democracy in Iraq by just holding elections... You need to enable Iraq’s core of citizens to have free access to information, absolutely all, all of legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's 2014 National Elections
    APRIL 2014 AHMED ALI MIDDLE EAST SECURITY REPORT 20 IRAQ’S 2014 NATIONAL ELECTIONS Cover: A traffic police officer directs vehicles near election campaign posters in Baghdad April 3, 2014. Iraq’s parliamentary election is scheduled for later this month. REUTERS/Ahmed Saad Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ©2014 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2014 in the United States of America by the Institute for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515 | Washington, DC 20036 www.understandingwar.org AHMED ALI MIDDLE EAST SECURITY REPORT 20 IRAQ’S 2014 NATIONAL ELECTIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MiddLE EAST SECURITY REPORT 20 | IRAq’s 2014 NaTIONAL ELECTIONS | AHMED ALI | APRIL 2014 Iraq’s 2014 national elections are taking place at a difficult time. The country is at a crossroads, presented with the possibility of widely different futures. Deteriorating security conditions frame political thought in ways that harken back to Iraq’s first national elections in 2005. The Iraqi state does not hold control of territory in some of Iraq’s key political provinces, such as Anbar, Ninewa, and Diyala. The disenfranchisement of Iraq’s Arab Sunnis; the rising threat of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS); and the activation of Ba‘athist groups collectively discourage electoral participation. Shi‘a militias that threatened Iraq’s security in 2004 have reactivated in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Marketing in Post-Conflict Elections: the Case of Iraq
    Journal of Political Marketing ISSN: 1537-7857 (Print) 1537-7865 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wplm20 Political Marketing in Post-Conflict Elections: The Case of Iraq Adam Harmes To cite this article: Adam Harmes (2016): Political Marketing in Post-Conflict Elections: The Case of Iraq, Journal of Political Marketing, DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2016.1193834 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1193834 Accepted author version posted online: 03 Jun 2016. Published online: 03 Jun 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 13 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=wplm20 Download by: [University of Western Ontario] Date: 24 June 2016, At: 07:21 Political Marketing in Post-conflict Elections: The Case of Iraq Adam Harmes Address correspondence to Adam Harmes, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Western Ontario, 4155 Social Sciences Building, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada. 416-346-4770. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article examines political marketing in post-conflict elections through an illustrative case study of post-Saddam Iraq. It does so through articles and media reports as well as interviews and participant-observation research conducted in Iraq during the 2014 national and provincial elections. The article argues that, despite having a number of the comparative and ethnic conflict country characteristics that work against a market oriented approach, Iraqi political parties have become increasingly professionalized and, to a lesser extent, willing to change their product in response to market research.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Politics, Elections, and Benchmarks
    Iraq: Politics, Elections, and Benchmarks Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs June 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21968 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Iraq: Politics, Elections, and Benchmarks Summary Iraq’s political system, the result of a U.S.-supported election process, is increasingly characterized by peaceful competition rather than violence, but sectarianism and ethnic and factional infighting continue to simmer. As 2009 began, there was renewed maneuvering by opponents of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki who view him as authoritarian and were perceived as conspiring to try to replace him, had his party fared poorly in the January 31, 2009, provincial elections. However, the elections strengthened Maliki and other Iraqis who believe that power should remain centralized in Baghdad, and Maliki is considered well positioned to compete in the parliamentary elections (to be held on January 30, 2010) that will select the next four-year government. The provincial elections, held in all provinces except Kirkuk and the Kurdish- controlled provinces, were relatively peaceful and there was a more diverse array of party slates than those that characterized the January 2005 provincial elections. Internal dissension within Iraq aside, the Bush Administration was optimistic that the passage of key laws in 2008, coupled with the provincial elections, would sustain recent reductions in violence. President Obama praised the orderliness and relative absence of violence of the provincial elections—an outcome that reaffirmed the Obama Administration’s belief that it can proceed with a planned reduction of the U.S. troop presence (to about 35,000 – 50,000 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq in Crisis
    Burke Chair in Strategy Iraq in Crisis By Anthony H. Cordesman and Sam Khazai January 6, 2014 Request for comments: This report is a draft that will be turned into an electronic book. Comments and suggested changes would be greatly appreciated. Please send any comments to Anthony H. Cordsman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, at [email protected]. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Iraq in Crisis: Cordesman and Khazai AHC Final Review Draft 6.1.14 ii Acknowledgements This analysis was written with the assistance of Burke Chair researcher Daniel DeWit. Iraq in Crisis: Cordesman and Khazai AHC Final Review Draft 6.1.14 iii Executive Summary As events in late December 2013 and early 2014 have made brutally clear, Iraq is a nation in crisis bordering on civil war. It is burdened by a long history of war, internal power struggles, and failed governance. Is also a nation whose failed leadership is now creating a steady increase in the sectarian divisions between Shi’ite and Sunni, and the ethnic divisions between Arab and Kurd. Iraq suffers badly from the legacy of mistakes the US made during and after its invasion in 2003. It suffers from threat posed by the reemergence of violent Sunni extremist movements like Al Qaeda and equally violent Shi’ite militias. It suffers from pressure from Iran and near isolation by several key Arab states. It has increasingly become the victim of the forces unleashed by the Syrian civil war. Its main threats, however, are self-inflicted wounds caused by its political leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratization in Iraq by Kate Lotz and Tim Melvin
    H UMAN R IGHTS & H UMAN W ELFARE Democratization in Iraq by Kate Lotz and Tim Melvin Prospects for political and economic success in Iraq are uncertain. The U.S.-led effort can fail in many ways, notably by a loss of political will in the face of terrorism and weak allies. On the other hand, success could change the shape of political institutions throughout the Middle East (Robert J. Barro in Business Week, April 5, 2004). In great numbers and under great risk, Iraqis have shown their commitment to democracy. By participating in free elections, the Iraqi people have firmly rejected the anti-democratic ideology of the terrorists. They have refused to be intimidated by thugs and assassins. And they have demonstrated the kind of courage that is always the foundation of self-government (George W. Bush, from Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, February 7, 2005). Restructuring Iraq's political system will be laden with difficulties, but it will certainly be feasible. At the same time, the blueprint for Iraq's democracy must reflect the unique features of Iraqi society. Once the system is in place, its benefits will quickly become evident to Iraq's various communities; if it brings economic prosperity (hardly unlikely given the country's wealth), the postwar structure will gradually, yet surely, acquire legitimacy (Adeed and Karen Dawisha in Foreign Affairs, May/June 2003). With the war in Iraq over, Coalition forces are still present as the cultivation of Iraqi democracy is underway. Coalition-led democratization in Iraq will prove to be a lengthy and complex objective, but one which will be pursued until successfully accomplished.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Multiple Electoral Processes in the Evolution of the Conduct Iraqi Voters After 2003
    Journal of US-China Public Administration, March 2017, Vol. 14, No. 3, 160-182 doi: 10.17265/1548-6591/2017.03.004 D DAVID PUBLISHING The Impact of Multiple Electoral Processes in the Evolution of the Conduct Iraqi Voters After 2003 Khamees Hezam Wali University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq Riad Ghazi Al-Badran The Independent Higher Commission for Elections in Iraq, Najaf, Iraq The topic area of the research deals with election in Iraq and new electoral system which is considered as new features of Iraqi political system based on participation and multiparty system; the researchers argued that the process of elections has not provided an opportunity for concrete progress on the path of democracy; it has not made any significant contribution to the process of political change, and it has provided the opportunity for researchers and analysts to rationalize mechanism of authority in Iraq after 2003. The researchers argued the Iraqi electoral behavior in the federal parliamentary elections since 2005 to 2014, and there is no need to keep track of the voting behavior by voters, but it needs to check the basis of the appellation of the electoral lists and make them be based on national principles, rather than sectarian and ethnic principles. The voting behavior of the Iraqi voters is often influenced by the social composition of the community, and the researchers argued that the continuation of the electoral process periodically will contribute significantly to the changing in their locally based voting behavior to nationally based voting behavior. Keywords: elections, behavior, electoral behavior, parties, sharing The parliamentary elections reflect the evolution of the political system, regardless of whether it is real or evolution formality.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq in Crisis
    Burke Chair in Strategy Iraq in Crisis By Anthony H. Cordesman and Sam Khazai January 24, 2014 Request for comments: This report is a draft that will be turned into an electronic book. Comments and suggested changes would be greatly appreciated. Please send any comments to Anthony H. Cordsman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, at [email protected]. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Iraq in Crisis: Cordesman and Khazai January 24, 2014 Update ii Acknowledgements This analysis was written with the assistance of Burke Chair researcher Daniel Dewitt. Iraq in Crisis: Cordesman and Khazai January 24, 2014 Update iii Executive Summary As events in late December 2013 and early 2014 have made brutally clear, Iraq is a nation in crisis bordering on civil war. It is burdened by a long history of war, internal power struggles, and failed governance. Is also a nation whose failed leadership is now creating a steady increase in the sectarian divisions between Shi’ite and Sunni, and the ethnic divisions between Arab and Kurd. Iraq suffers badly from the legacy of mistakes the US made during and after its invasion in 2003. It suffers from threat posed by the reemergence of violent Sunni extremist movements like Al Qaeda and equally violent Shi’ite militias. It suffers from pressure from Iran and near isolation by several key Arab states. It has increasingly become the victim of the forces unleashed by the Syrian civil war. The country’s main threats, however, result from self-inflicted wounds caused by its political leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Issues in the 116Th Congress
    Iraq: Issues in the 116th Congress Updated July 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45633 SUMMARY R45633 Iraq: Issues in the 116th Congress July 17, 2020 Iraq’s unicameral legislature, the Council of Representatives (COR), voted to approve Prime Minister Mustafa al Kadhimi’s government program in May 2020 and finished confirmation of Christopher M. Blanchard his cabinet in June, ending a months-long political vacuum. Al Kadhimi has billed his Specialist in Middle government as transitional, pledging to move to early elections as soon as they can be held safely Eastern Affairs and fairly. He has acknowledged and begun acting to address the demands of protestors, whose mass demonstrations paralyzed Iraq in late 2019 and early 2020, and led to former prime minister Adel Abd al Mahdi’s resignation in November 2019. Kadhimi and his cabinet are contending with difficult choices and risks stemming from ongoing U.S.-Iran tensions, diminished oil revenues, resulting fiscal pressures, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and remnants of the Islamic State organization (IS, aka ISIS/ISIL). U.S.-Iraqi cooperation has achieved several shared goals in recent years, but joint efforts also have faced significant challenges. U.S. and coalition military assistance aided Iraqi efforts to end IS control of Iraqi territory from 2014 through 2018, and since have continued to support Iraqi counterterrorism operations and efforts to stabilize recovered areas and build the capacity of Iraqi security forces. U.S. military personnel and coalition counterparts remain in Iraq at the government’s invitation, subject to bilateral executive-to-executive agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Gender Analysis of Iraq's Electoral and Political Process'
    Gender Analysis of Iraq’s Electoral and Political Process October 2019 Gender Analysis of Iraq’s Electoral and Political Process October 2019 Lead Author: Gina Chirillo Contributing Author: Caroline Roddey The authors wish to thank Zeinab Abdelkarim, Gabrielle Bardall, Elizabeth Reiter Dettmer, Anna Wiktorowska, and Ambar Zobairi for their reviews and inputs on this paper. Gender Analysis of Iraq’s Electoral and Political Process Copyright © 2019 International Foundation for Electoral Systems. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of IFES. Requests for permission should include the following information: • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, email address, and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive, 10th Floor Arlington, VA 22202 Email: [email protected] Fax: 202.350.6701 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Displacement and Iraq's Political Marketplace: Addressing Political Barriers to IDP Return
    IRIS REPORT Displacement and Iraq's Political Marketplace: Addressing Political Barriers to IDP Return Mac Skelton February 2021 Zmkan Ali Saleem ABOUT IRIS The Institute of Regional and International Studies (IRIS) is an Iraq-based research center committed to producing independent and empirically rigorous political analysis of Iraq and the broader Middle East region. Housed at the American University of Iraq, Sulaimani (AUIS), the Institute partners with academic institutions and funding agencies from across the world that share IRIS' mission of grounding the policy conversation on Iraq in rigorous research and local expertise. IRIS convenes events throughout the year, including the annual Sulaimani Forum, in order to disseminate research findings and to promote dialogue among a broad range of stakeholders on the most complex policy challenges facing Iraq and the region. Finally, IRIS builds the skills and capacity of young researchers, policymakers, and leaders towards the aim of leveraging policy research into political and social change. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Mac Skelton is Executive Director of the Institute of Regional and International Studies (IRIS) at the American University of Iraq, Sulaimani (AUIS), and a Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics (LSE) Middle East Centre. He tweets @Mac_Skelton Dr. Zmkan Ali Saleem is Program Director for Research at the Institute of Regional and International Studies (IRIS) at the American University of Iraq, Sulaimani (AUIS). He teaches in the College of Political Science at the University of Sulaimani. The views expressed in the article are those of the authors alone, and do not reflect the views of the Institute of Regional and International Studies (IRIS).
    [Show full text]