DOCSLIB.ORG

Abacus of Frozen Conflicts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abacus of Frozen Conflicts Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 2010-06 Abacus of frozen conflicts Karimov, Reshad. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5280 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS ABACUS OF FROZEN CONFLICTS by Reshad Karimov June 2010 Thesis Advisor: Michael E. Freeman Second Reader: Frank R. Giordano Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2010 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Abacus of Frozen Conflicts 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) Reshad Karimov 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. government. IRB Protocol Number: ________________. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited A 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) One of the central topics of international relations study is the function of military threats as a mean to deter international crises and war. Rational choice models provide the groundwork for theorizing circumstances under which conventional deterrence is likely to thrive or fail. According to Paul Huth, rational deterrence theorists have focused on four sets of variables: the balance of military forces, costly signaling and bargaining behavior, reputations, and interests at stake. By using the case of the Russian-Georgian War of August of 2008, one can argue that an actor’s perception, in addition to signaling, is another essential variable for successful deterrence. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Russian-Georgian War of August of 2008, Deterrence Theory, Security 15. NUMBER OF Dilemma, Perception, Accidental War, Spiral Model, Game Theory, Game of Chicken, USSR, Fall of PAGES the Soviet Union, Republic of Georgia, Russia, South Ossetian Conflict, Abkhaz Conflict, Frozen 75 Conflicts, Frozen Peace Processes 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UU NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited ABACUS OF FROZEN CONFLICTS Reshad Karimov Research Fellow, Center for Strategic Studies, under the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan M.A., Azerbaijan State University, 2001 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN DEFENSE ANALYSIS from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL June 2010 Author: Reshad Karimov Approved by: Michael E. Freeman Thesis Advisor Frank R. Giordano Second Reader Gordon H. McCormick, PhD Chairman, Department of Defense Analysis iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT One of the central topics of international relations study is the function of military threats as a mean to deter international crises and war. Rational choice models provide the groundwork for theorizing circumstances under which conventional deterrence is likely to thrive or fail. According to Paul Huth, rational deterrence theorists have focused on four sets of variables: the balance of military forces, costly signaling and bargaining behavior, reputations, and interests at stake.1 By using the case of the Russian-Georgian War of August of 2008, one can argue that an actor’s perception, in addition to signaling, is another essential variable for successful deterrence. 1 Paul K. Huth, “Deterrence and International Conflict: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Debates,” Annual Review Political Science, Vol. 2 (1999) 25. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY .....................3 II. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE.................................................................................5 A. SOVIET LEGACY ..........................................................................................5 B. REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA............................................................................6 1. South Ossetian Conflict .......................................................................8 2. Abkhaz Conflict ...................................................................................9 3. Frozen Peace Processes......................................................................10 C. DETERIORATING SECURITY .................................................................10 D. RUSSIA’S ROLE...........................................................................................16 E. THE WAR OF AUGUST OF 2008...............................................................19 III. THEORIES.................................................................................................................23 A. THE SPIRAL MODEL .................................................................................23 B. ACCIDENTAL WAR....................................................................................25 C. THE DETERRENCE THEORY..................................................................26 D. PERCEPTION ...............................................................................................29 IV. GAME THEORY APPROACH ...............................................................................33 A. INITIAL CONDITIONS...............................................................................33 B. THE GAME....................................................................................................36 1. Rankings .............................................................................................37 V. CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................47 LIST OF REFERENCES......................................................................................................53 INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST .........................................................................................59 vii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. USSR Nationalities, 1982 ..................................................................................6 Figure 2. Map of Georgia, 2008........................................................................................7 Figure 3. Map of Georgia................................................................................................14 Figure 4. Map of 2008 Georgia-Russian War .................................................................20 Figure 5. Outcome Matrix...............................................................................................37 Figure 6. Payoff Matrix, Georgia’s Point of View..........................................................39 Figure 7. Payoff Matrix, Russia’s Point of View............................................................40 Figure 8. Likely Outcome without Communication .......................................................43 Figure 9. Decision Tree...................................................................................................45 ix THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK x LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Strategic Options for Georgia ..........................................................................38 Table 2. Strategic Options for Russia ............................................................................38 xi THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK xii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Completing a thesis is a challenge, thanking all those who contributed to it are an even greater one. Due to the nature of my study, many people were involved in one or the other way in it. I want to thank all of them, including those not mentioned here by name. I thank Prof. Michael E. Freeman and Prof. Frank R. Giordano in the acknowledgements and because each one of you has contributed to my knowledge, learning, and growth. Special thanks to my wife and best friend, Shafag, for her love and patient support—you always go the extra mile, and do so with incredible grace. Javad, when you’re old enough to read, I hope you’re as proud of your Daddy as he is of you. I also want to thank my mother, Elmira Karimova,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Political Prisoners in Post- Revolutionary Georgia
    After the rose, the thorns: political prisoners in post- revolutionary Georgia Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the the right to life, liberty and security of person.
    [Show full text]
  • Six-Point Ceasefire Agreement Between Russia and Georgia
    IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW: SIX-POINT CEASEFIRE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RUSSIA AND GEORGIA THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND DAVID L. PHILLIPS August 2011 THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY The National Committee on American Foreign Policy was founded in 1974 by Professor Hans J. Morgenthau and others. It is a nonprofit activist organization dedicated to the resolution of conflicts that threaten US interests. Toward that end, the National Committee identifies, articulates, and helps advance American foreign policy interests from a nonpartisan perspective within the framework of political realism. American foreign policy interests include: • Preserving and strengthening national security; • Supporting countries committed to the values and the practice of political, religious, and cultural pluralism; • Improving U.S. relations with the developed and developing worlds; • Advancing human rights • Encouraging realistic arms-control agreements; • Curbing the proliferation of nuclear and other unconventional weapons; • Promoting an open and global economy An important part of the activity of the NCAFP is Track I ½ and Track II diplomacy. Such closed-door and off-the-record endeavors provide unique opportunities for senior U.S. and foreign officials, think-tank experts, and scholars to engage in discussions designed to defuse conflict, build confidence, and resolve problems. Believing that an informed public is vital to a democratic society, the National Committee offers educational programs that address security challenges facing the United States and publishes a variety of publications, including its bimonthly journal, American Foreign Policy Interests, that present keen analyses of all aspects of American foreign policy. v THE INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY The Institute for the Study of Human Rights (ISHR) was established in 1978 at Columbia University as the Center for the Study of Human Rights (CSHR).
    [Show full text]
  • Russia-Georgia Conflict in August 2008
    = :88.&8*47,.&=43+1.(9=.3=:,:89=,**2a= 439*=9=&3)=251.(&9.438=+47=_ _=39*7*898= .2=.(-41= 5*(.&1.89=.3= :88.&3=&3)=:7&8.&3=++&.78= &7(-=-`=,**3= 43,7*88.43&1= *8*&7(-=*7;.(*= 18/1**= <<<_(78_,4;= -.0+2= =*5479=+47=43,7*88 Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress :88.&8*47,.&= 43+1.(9=.3=:,:89=,**2a=439*=9=&3)= 251.(&9.438=+47=__= 39*7*898= = :22&7>= In the early 1990s, Georgia and its breakaway South Ossetia region had agreed to a Russian- mediated ceasefire that provided for Russian “peacekeepers” to be stationed in the region. Moscow extended citizenship and passports to most ethnic Ossetians. Simmering long-time tensions escalated on the evening of August 7, 2008, when South Ossetia and Georgia accused each other of launching intense artillery barrages against each other. Georgia claims that South Ossetian forces did not respond to a ceasefire appeal but intensified their shelling, “forcing” Georgia to send in troops. On August 8, Russia launched air attacks throughout Georgia and Russian troops engaged Georgian forces in South Ossetia. By the morning of August 10, Russian troops had occupied the bulk of South Ossetia, reached its border with the rest of Georgia, and were shelling areas across the border. Russian troops occupied several Georgian cities. Russian warships landed troops in Georgia’s breakaway Abkhazia region and took up positions off Georgia’s Black Sea coast. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, serving as the president of the European Union (EU), was instrumental in getting Georgia and Russia to agree to a peace plan on August 15-16.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Georgia Right
    Getting Georgia Right Svante Cornell Getting Georgia Right Getting Georgia Right Svante Cornell CREDITS Centre for European Studies Rue du Commerce 20 B-1000 Brussels The Centre for European Studies (CES) is the political foundation and think tank of the Euro- pean People’s Party (EPP), dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.thinkingeurope.eu Editor: Ingrid Habets, Research Officer (CES), [email protected] External editing: Communicative English bvba Typesetting: Victoria Agency Layout and cover design: RARO S.L. Printed in Belgium by Drukkerij Jo Vandenbulcke This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. © Centre for European Studies 2013 The European Parliament and the Centre for European Studies assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or their subsequent use. Sole responsibility lies with the author of this publication. 2 Getting Georgia Right About the CES The Centre for European Studies (CES), established in 2007, is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP). The CES embodies a pan-European mindset, promoting Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. It serves as a framework for national political foundations linked to member parties of the EPP. It currently has 26 member foundations in 20 EU and non-EU countries. The CES takes part in the preparation of EPP programmes and policy documents. It organises seminars and training on EU policies and on the process of European integration. The CES also contributes to formulating EU and national public policies. It produces research studies and books, electronic newsletters, policy briefs, and the twice-yearly European View journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Escaping the Kmara Box: Reframing the Role of Civil Society in Georgia's Rose Revolution Angley, Robyn E
    www.ssoar.info Escaping the Kmara Box: Reframing the Role of Civil Society in Georgia's Rose Revolution Angley, Robyn E. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Angley, R. E. (2013). Escaping the Kmara Box: Reframing the Role of Civil Society in Georgia's Rose Revolution. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 5(1), 42-57. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-362472 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen.
    [Show full text]
  • A High-Need Azeri School: a Georgian Perspective Nino Sharvashidze Ilia State University, Georgia
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications in Educational Administration Educational Administration, Department of 2014 A high-need Azeri school: A Georgian perspective Nino Sharvashidze Ilia State University, Georgia Miles T. Bryant University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedadfacpub Part of the International and Comparative Education Commons, and the Other Educational Administration and Supervision Commons Sharvashidze, Nino and Bryant, Miles T., "A high-need Azeri school: A Georgian perspective" (2014). Faculty Publications in Educational Administration. 2. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedadfacpub/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational Administration, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications in Educational Administration by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Management in Education 28:3 (2014), pp. 97-100; doi: 10.1177/0892020614537663 Copyright © 2014 British Educational Leadership, Management & Administration Society (BELMAS); published by Sage Publications. Used by permission. digitalcommons.unl.edu A high-need Azeri school: A Georgian perspective Nino Sharvashidze1 and Miles Bryant 2 1. Ilia State University, Georgia 2. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Corresponding author – Miles Bryant, 140 TEAC, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0360, email [email protected] Abstract This article contributes to the International Study of Leadership Development Network initiative to identify high-need schools around the globe by focusing on a small minority ethnic school in the country of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Hybrid Wars: a Comparative Analysis of Russian
    PUTIN’S HYBRID WARS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN INCURSIONS INTO GEORGIA, UKRAINE, BULGARIA, AND SYRIA A thesis submitted to the Kent State University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors by Joshua Haynie May, 2020 Thesis written by Joshua Haynie Approved by _____________________________________________________________________, Advisor _______________________________________, Chair, Department of Political Science Accepted by ___________________________________________________, Dean, Honors College ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTON.............................................................................................................1 1. Research Design...................................................................................................4 II. LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................................................6 1. Hybrid Warfare....................................................................................................6 2. Hybrid Warfare and Russian Thinking..............................................................15 3. Gerasimov and Non-Linear Warfare.................................................................16 4. Political Warfare and the Kremlin’s Playbook..................................................21 5. Russian Foreign Policy......................................................................................23 III. GEORGIA....................................................................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Escaping the Kmara Box: Reframing the Role of Civil Society in Georgia’S Rose Revolution
    42 STSS Vol 5 / Issue 1 Studies of Transition States and Societies Escaping the Kmara Box: Reframing the Role of Civil Society in Georgia’s Rose Revolution Robyn E. Angley* Abstract This article examines the role of civic groups in Georgia’s Rose Revolution using Larry Diamond’s framework of the democratic functions of civil society. The author argues that the contribution of civil society to the peaceful transfer of power in 2003 is best understood by expanding the analytical focus out from the Kmara youth movement to include a larger set of organisations. Rather than focusing on the Kmara youth movement as the primary civil society actor in 2003, the author contends that Kmara was, in fact, a product of the coordinated involvement of a cohort of NGOs. The article stresses the highly interconnected nature of Georgian civic leaders and organisations, particularly regarding networks with other NGOs, opposition politicians, and journalists from the Rustavi 2 television station. Keywords: Civil society, Kmara, Georgia, Rose Revolution, Colour Revolutions. Introduction The Rose Revolution of November 2003 was Georgia’s first non-violent post-Communist transfer of power and, more importantly (at least in a regional sense), the first successful ouster of a post- Soviet leader using what Bunce and Wolchik (2006a) have dubbed the electoral revolution model. This model called for a united opposition front, access to pro-opposition media outlets, extensive election monitoring and get-out-the vote initiatives, and large-scale peaceful demonstrations. The same model would later also be used in Ukraine in 2004 and Kyrgyzstan in 2005. These three successful anti-regime efforts came to be known collectively as the Colour Revolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Up in Flames
    Up In Flames Humanitarian Law Violations and Civilian Victims in the Conflict over South Ossetia Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-427-3 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org January 2009 1-56432-427-3 Up In Flames Humanitarian Law Violations and Civilian Victims in the Conflict over South Ossetia Map of South Ossetia ......................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 2 Overview .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE ETHNIC ARMENIAN MINORITY of GEORGIA Report by the «Yerkir» Union of Non-Governmental Organizations for Repatriation and Settlement
    September 17, 2007 THE ETHNIC ARMENIAN MINORITY OF GEORGIA Report by the «Yerkir» Union of Non-Governmental Organizations for Repatriation and Settlement YERKIR Europe YERKIR Arménie YERKIR Géorgie 25, rue Vaubecour 20, rue A. Bakounts 7, Rue Sulkhan-Saba 69002, Lyon Erevan 107, Tbilissi France Arménie Géorgie [email protected] “Yerkir” Union 2 The Ethnic Armenian Minority of Georgia 1. Statistical data on the Armenian population of Georgia According to the 2002 official census, 4.372 thousand people reside in Georgia in which 248.9 thousand are ethnic Armenians (5.7%). The Armenians compactly reside in Akhaltskha, Akhalkalak and Ninotsminda districts of Samtskhe-Javakheti province of Georgia, where they account for 36.6% (16.9 thousand people), 94.3% (57.5 thousand), and 95.8% (32.9 thousand) of the population respectively. A significant number of Armenians reside in Aspindza and Borzhomi districts of Samtskhe-Javakheti province, 17.5% (2.3 thousand) and 9.6% (3.1 thousand) respectively. In general, the number of Armenians residing in Samtskhe-Javakheti province is 113.3 thousand (55%). In Kvemo- Kartli province, the Armenians are a majority in Tsalka district, 55% (11.5 thousand). A sizable Armenian population also resides in Bolnisi, Tetritskaro and Marneuli districts of Kvemo-Kartli province, 5.8% (4.3 thousand), 10.4% (2.6 thousand) and 7.9% (9.3 thousand) respectively. In the capital, Tbilisi, 82.6 thousand Armenians reside (7.6%).1 2. The demographic policy of the Georgian authorities Article 27 of the International Covenant on
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Watch | Defending Human Rights Worldwide
    Human Rights Watch | Defending Human Rights Worldwide http://www.hrw.org/en/embargo/node/79681?signature=d58526e16d2... EMBARGO Up In Flames JANUARY 23, 2009 Up In Flames Humanitarian Law Violations and Civilian Victims in the Conflict over South Ossetia Map of South Ossetia Executive Summary Overview.. Brief Chronology of the Armed Conflict Violations by Georgian Forces Violations by Russian Forces Violations by South Ossetian Forces Use of Cluster Munitions International Responses to the Conflict Methodology Part 1: Background 1.1 Background on South Ossetia 1991-92 Conflict in South Ossetia 2003-06: New Leadership in Georgia, New Agenda for Recovering South Ossetia 2006-08: Tensions Rise between Russia and Georgia The Lead-up to the August 2008 War The Fighting and Immediate Political Aftermath 1.2 International Legal Framework International Humanitarian Law Governing Hostilities Basic Principles of International Humanitarian Law.. Individual Criminal Responsibility Position of Peacekeepers under International Humanitarian Law.. Law on Occupation and Effective Control Right to Return Part 2: Violations by Georgian Forces 2.1 Overview.. 2.2 Indiscriminate Shelling of Tskhinvali and Outlying Villages Tskhinvali Civilians Killed in Shelling 2.3 Attacks by Georgian Forces on Civilians Fleeing the Conflict Zone Attacks on vehicles and international humanitarian law.. 2.4 Georgian Forces' Ground Offensive The Conduct of Georgian Troops during the Ground Offensive 2.5 Georgia's Use of Cluster Munitions How Georgian Clusters Landed in Gori District Civilian Casualties from M85s 2.6 Russian Allegations against Georgia of Genocide and Other War Crimes Political Statements and Russian Criminal Investigation Russia's Allegations Not Supported by Available Evidence 2.7 The Issue of Civilian Casualties in South Ossetia Early Figures from Russian and South Ossetian Officials not Borne out 1 of 68 21/01/2009 13:13 Human Rights Watch | Defending Human Rights Worldwide http://www.hrw.org/en/embargo/node/79681?signature=d58526e16d2..
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council
    United Nations A/63/884–S/2009/305 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 June 2009 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-third session Sixty-fourth year Agenda item 13 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development Identical letters dated 10 June 2009 from the Permanent Representative of Georgia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council I have the honour to transmit a document prepared by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia regarding violations by the Russian Federation of the six-point Ceasefire Agreement of 12 August (see annex). I would be grateful if the present letter and its annex were circulated as a document of the sixty-third session of the General Assembly, under agenda item 13, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Alexander Lomaia Permanent Representative 09-36861 (E) 140709 *0936861* A/63/884 S/2009/305 Annex to the identical letters dated 10 June 2009 from the Permanent Representative of Georgia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council Summary of violations of the 12 August six-point Ceasefire Agreement by the Russian Federation 3 June 2009 I. Summary: Georgia’s position The Russian Federation remains in breach of the six-point Ceasefire Agreement of 12 August. In order for the Russian Federation to fully implement the agreement status quo ante which existed before the outbreak of hostilities on 7 August, must be restored.
    [Show full text]