DOCSLIB.ORG

Philosophy and Methodology of Economics, Kevin D. Hoover, Duke

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philosophy and Methodology of Economics, Kevin D. Hoover, Duke 3KLORVRSK\(FRQRPLFV 7KH3KLORVRSK\DQG0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFV 6SULQJ $GPLQLVWUDWLYH'HWDLOV ,QVWUXFWRU3URIHVVRU.'+RRYHU /HFWXUH 300RQGD\$:HVW'XNH (DVW&DPSXV 2IILFH6RFLDO6FLHQFH%XLOGLQJ :HVW&DPSXV 7HOHSKRQH (PDLO NGKRRYHU#GXNHHGX 3HUVRQDO:HEVLWH KWWSZZZHFRQGXNHHGXaNGK &RXUVHZHEVLWH KWWSZZZHFRQGXNHHGXa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±HJWKRVHRI-RKQ6WXDUW0LOO-RKQ1HYLOOH .H\QHVDQG0LOWRQ)ULHGPDQWRHFRQRPLFPHWKRGRORJ\DQGWKRVHRI&DUO+HPSHO.DUO 3RSSHU7KRPDV.XKQDQG,PUp/DNDWRVWRWKHSKLORVRSK\RIVFLHQFHZLWKFDVHVWXGLHV RIWKHLUDSSOLFDWLRQVWRHFRQRPLFSUREOHPV:HZLOODOVRFRQVLGHUDYDULHW\RIUHFHQW WRSLFVDWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRISKLORVRSK\DQGHFRQRPLFVVXFKDVPRGHOVFDXVDOLW\ UHGXFWLRQLVPDQGUHDOLVP 5HTXLUHG:RUNDQG*UDGLQJ 7KHUHDUHWKUHHUHTXLUHGJUDGHGSDUWVWRWKHFRXUVH :HHNO\VKRUWDVVLJQPHQWVSHUFHQW 7KHVHDVVLJQPHQWVDUHPHDQWWRPDNH VXUHWKDW\RXDUHXSWRVSHHGRQDQGHQJDJHGLQWKHSULPDU\UHDGLQJV ,QVWUXFWLRQVDUHJLYHQEHORZ,ZLOOJLYHIXUWKHULQVWUXFWLRQVDERXWLQFODVV &ODVVSDUWLFLSDWLRQSHUFHQW7KHFODVVZLOOEHFRQGXFWHGDVDVHPLQDUDQG GLVFXVVLRQDQGSDUWLFLSDWLRQLVHVVHQWLDO6WXGHQWVDUHH[SHFWHGWREHSUHSDUHGWR 3KLO(FRQ7KH3KLORVRSK\DQG0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFV 6\OODEXV 6SULQJ GLVFXVVWRSLFVDQGWRSDUWLFLSDWHDFWLYHO\ $QDO\WLFDOSDSHUVSHUFHQW7KHUHZLOOEHWKUHHORQJHUDQDO\WLFDOSDSHUV GXULQJWKHVHPHVWHU 7KHWRSLFVGXHGDWHVDQGLQVWUXFWLRQVDUHOLVWHGEHORZ , ZLOOSURYLGHIXUWKHUGHWDLOVLQFODVV $FDGHPLF(WKLFV ,ZLOOKROG\RXWRVWULFWVWDQGDUGVRIDFDGHPLFHWKLFV 3OHDVHFOLFNRQWKH$FDGHPLF +RQHVW\ OLQNRQWKH FRXUVHZHEVLWHIRUWKHGHWDLOHGSROLF\ 5HDGLQJV $OOUHDGLQJVDUHHOHFWURQLFDOO\DFFHVVLEOH JRWRWKH5HDGLQJVOLQNRQ WKHFRXUVHZHEVLWH )URPWKHUH\RXFDQHLWKHUFOLFNRQGLUHFWOLQNVWKURXJKWKHOLEUDU\ RUGRZQORDG WKURXJK OLQNVWRDVHFXUHGLUHFWRU\ ,ZLOOVHQGWKHORJLQDQGSDVVZRUGLQIRUPDWLRQIRUWKHVHFXUH GLUHFWRU\WRUHJLVWHUHGPHPEHUVRIWKHFODVVE\HPDLO ,I\RXQHHGWKHORJLQDQG SDVVZRUGDQGGRQ¶WKDYHLWSOHDVHHPDLOPH ([DFWO\ZKLFKUHDGLQJVDUHGXHHDFK ZHHNFDQEHIRXQGRQWKHFRXUVHZHEVLWHXQGHUWKHOLQN:HHNO\$VVLJQPHQWV $%DFNJURXQG 7KHUHDGLQJVLQWKLVVHFWLRQZLOOKHOS\RXWRJHW\RXUEHDULQJVLQWKHFRXUVH<RX VKRXOGUHDGWKHPRQ\RXURZQDVVRRQDVSRVVLEOHLQWKHFRXUVH 'DQLHO+DXVPDQ³(FRQRPLF0HWKRGRORJ\LQD1XWVKHOO´-RXUQDORI(FRQRPLF 3HUVSHFWLYHV SS 'DQLHO+DXVPDQ³$SSHQGL[$Q,QWURGXFWLRQWR3KLORVRSK\RI6FLHQFH´7KH,QH[DFW DQG6HSDUDWH6FLHQFHRI(FRQRPLFV&DPEULGJH&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV SS 0DUN%ODXJ0DUFHO%RXPDQV-RKQ'DYLV+DUUR0DDVDQG*HUW5HXWHQ³$6KRUW ,QWURGXFWLRQWRWKH0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFV´XQSXEOLVKHGPDQXVFULSW 8QLYHUVLW\RI$PVWHUGDP %&ODVVLFDO&RQWULEXWLRQVWR(FRQRPLF0HWKRGRORJ\ 'DYLG+XPH$7UHDWLVHRI+XPDQ1DWXUH%RRN,,,3DUW,6HFWLRQ -RKQ6WXDUW0LOO³2QWKH'HILQLWLRQRI3ROLWLFDO(FRQRP\DQGWKH0HWKRGRI ,QYHVWLJDWLRQ3URSHUWR,W´ LQ (VVD\VRQ6RPH8QVHWWOHG4XHVWLRQVRI3ROLWLFDO (FRQRP\ -RKQ1HYLOOH.H\QHV7KH6FRSHDQG0HWKRGRI3ROLWLFDO(FRQRP\WKHGLWLRQ /LRQHO5REELQV7KH1DWXUHDQG6LJQLILFDQFHRI(FRQRPLF6FLHQFH 3DUW, 3DUW,, 3KLO(FRQ7KH3KLORVRSK\DQG0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFV 6\OODEXV 6SULQJ &)ULHGPDQDQG3RVLWLYH(FRQRPLFV 0LOWRQ)ULHGPDQ³7KH0HWKRGRORJ\RI3RVLWLYH(FRQRPLFV´LQ )ULHGPDQ(VVD\VLQ 3RVLWLYH(FRQRPLFV&KLFDJR8QLYHUVLW\RI&KLFDJR3UHVV 'DQLHO +DXVPDQ³:K\/RRN8QGHUWKH+RRG"´LQ(VVD\VRQ3KLORVRSK\DQG (FRQRPLF0HWKRGRORJ\&DPEULGJH&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVVFK SS 8VNDOL0lNL³8QUHDOLVWLF$VVXPSWLRQVDQG8QQHFHVVDU\&RQIXVLRQV5HUHDGLQJDQG 5HZULWLQJ)DVD5HDOLVW6WDWHPHQW´LQ8VNDOL0lNLHGLWRU 7KH0HWKRGRORJ\RI 3RVLWLYH(FRQRPLFV5HIOHFWLRQVRQWKH0LOWRQ )ULHGPDQ/HJDF\ &DPEULGJH &DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVVFK SS '3RSSHUDQG)DOVLILFDWLRQLVP .DUO3RSSHU 7KH/RJLFRI6FLHQWLILF'LVFRYHU\H[FHUSWV .DUO3RSSHU³6FLHQFH&RQMHFWXUHVDQG5HIXDWLRQV´LQ &RQMHFWXUHVDQG5HIXWDWLRQV /RQGRQ5RXWOHGJHDQG.HJDQ3DXOSS 0DUN%ODXJ³7KH7KHRU\RI&RQVXPHU%HKDYLRU´LQ 7KH0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFV QGHGFK SS %UXFH&DOGZHOO³&ODULI\LQJ3RSSHU´-RXUQDORI(FRQRPLF/LWHUDWXUH 0DUFK SS (3RSSHUDQG6LWXDWLRQDO$QDO\VLV .DUO3RSSHU³7KH/RJLFRIWKH6RFLDO6FLHQFHV´LQ7:$GRUQR 7KH3RVLWLYLVW 'LVSXWHLQ*HUPDQ6RFLRORJ\ /RQGRQ+HLQHPDQQSS 1RUHWWD.RHUWJH³7KH0HWKRGRORJLFDO6WDWXVRI3RSSHU¶V5DWLRQDOLW\3ULQFLSOH´ 7KHRU\DQG'HFLVLRQSS ':DGH+DQGV³.DUO3RSSHUDQG(FRQRPLF0HWKRGRORJ\´(FRQRPLFVDQG 3KLORVRSK\ SS 0DUN%ODXJ³&RPPHQWRQ':DGH+DQGVµ.DUO3RSSHUDQG(FRQRPLF 0HWKRGRORJ\$1HZ/RRN´(FRQRPLFVDQG3KLORVRSK\ SS ).XKQDQG6FLHQWLILF5HYROXWLRQV 7KRPDV.XKQ7KH6WUXFWXUHRI6FLHQWLILF 5HYROXWLRQVUGHG&KLFDJR8QLYHUVLW\RI &KLFDJR3UHVV &KDSWHU9 ³7KH3ULRULW\RI3DUDGLJPV´ DQG&KDSWHU,; ³7KH1DWXUHDQG1HFHVVLW\RI6FLHQWLILF5HYROXWLRQV´ 7KRPDV.XKQ³7KH(VVHQWLDO7HQVLRQ7UDGLWLRQDQG,QQRYDWLRQLQ6FLHQWLILF 5HVHDUFK´LQLQ%R\G&DVSHUDQG7URXWHGLWRUV 7KH3KLORVRSK\RI6FLHQFHFK 0DUWLQ %URQIHQEUHQQHU³7KHµ6WUXFWXUHRI5HYROXWLRQV¶LQ(FRQRPLF7KRXJKW´ +LVWRU\RI3ROLWLFDO(FRQRP\ SS $:&RDWV³,VWKHUHDµ6WUXFWXUHRI6FLHQWLILF5HYROXWLRQV¶LQ(FRQRPLFV"´.\NORV SS 3KLO(FRQ7KH3KLORVRSK\DQG0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFV 6\OODEXV 6SULQJ */DNDWRVDQGWKH0HWKRGRORJ\RI6FLHQWLILF5HVHDUFK3URJUDPV ,PUp/DNDWRV³&ULWLFLVPDQGWKH0HWKRGRORJ\RI6FLHQWLILF5HVHDUFK3URJUDPPHV´ 3URFHHGLQJVRIWKH$ULVWRWHOLDQ6RFLHW\YROSS -5HPHQ\L³&RUH'HPLFRUH,QWHUDFWLRQ7RZDUGD*HQHUDO7KHRU\RI'LVFLSOLQDU\ DQG6XEGLVFLSOLQDU\*URZWK´+LVWRU\RI3ROLWLFDO(FRQRP\ SS +/DNDWRVDQG(FRQRPLFV (5R\:HLQWUDXE³$SSUDLVLQJ*HQHUDO(TXLOLEULXP$QDO\VLV´(FRQRPLFVDQG 3KLORVRSK\YROQRSS 5RGQH\0DGGRFN³5DWLRQDO([SHFWDWLRQV0DFURWKHRU\$/DNDWRVLDQ&DVH6WXG\LQ 3URJUDP$GMXVWPHQW´+LVWRU\RI3ROLWLFDO(FRQRP\YROQRSS 0DUN%ODXJ³7KH7KHRU\RIWKH)LUP´LQ 7KH0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFVQGHGFK SS 0DUN%ODXJ³.XKQYHUVXV/DNDWRVRU3DUDGLJPVYHUVXV5HVHDUFK3URJUDPPHVLQWKH +LVWRU\RI(FRQRPLFV´6SLUR/DWVLVHGLWRU 0HWKRGDQG$SSUDLVDOLQ(FRQRPLFV &DPEULGJH&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVVSS ':DGH+DQGV³3RSSHUDQG/DNDWRVLQ(FRQRPLF0HWKRGRORJ\´LQ8VNDOL0lNL %R*XVWDIVVRQDQG&KULVWLDQ.QXGVHQHGLWRUV 5DWLRQDO,QVWLWXWLRQVDQG(FRQRPLF 0HWKRGRORJ\ /RQGRQ5RXWOHGJHSS ,/DZVLQ(FRQRPLFV± &DUO+HPSHO³/DZVDQG7KHLU5ROHLQ1DWXUDO([SODQDWLRQ´3KLORVRSK\RIWKH 1DWXUDO6FLHQFHV(QJOHZRRG&OLIIV1-3UHQWLFH+DOOLQ%R\G&DVSHU DQG7URXWHGLWRUV7KH3KLORVRSK\RI6FLHQFHFK 'DQLHO+DXVPDQ³6XSSO\DQG'HPDQG([SODQDWLRQVDQG7KHLU&HWHULXV3DULEXV &ODXVHV´ 5HYLHZRI3ROLWLFDO(FRQRP\ -XO\SS -/DZVLQ(FRQRPLFV± 1DQF\&DUWZULJKW³&HWHULV3DULEXV/DZVDQGWKH6RFLRHFRQRPLF0DFKLQH´LQWKH 'DSSOHG:RUOG&DPEULGJH&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVVFK SS .HYLQ'+RRYHU³$UH7KHUH0DFURHFRQRPLF/DZV´LQ 7KH0HWKRGRORJ\RI (PSLULFDO0DFURHFRQRPLFV&DPEULGJH&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVVFK SS .0RGHOV± 'DQLHO+DXVPDQ³0RGHOVDQG7KHRULHVLQ(FRQRPLFV´7KH,QH[DFWDQG6HSDUDWH 6FLHQFHRI(FRQRPLFV&DPEULGJH&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVVFK SS $OODQ*LEEDUGDQG+DO9DULDQ³(FRQRPLF0RGHOV´-RXUQDORI3KLORVRSK\ SS 3KLO(FRQ7KH3KLORVRSK\DQG0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFV 6\OODEXV 6SULQJ /0RGHOV± 5REHUW6XJGHQ³&UHGLEOH:RUOGV7KH6WDWXVRI7KHRUHWLFDO0RGHOVLQ(FRQRPLFV´ -RXUQDORI(FRQRPLF0HWKRGRORJ\ SS 0DU\0RUJDQ³7KH7HFKQRORJ\RI$QDO\WLFDO0RGHOV,UYLQJ)LVKHU¶V0RQHWDU\ :RUOGV´3KLORVRSK\RI6FLHQFH VXSSOHPHQW 'HFHPEHUSS66 0 5HDOLVP 8VNDOL0lNL³5HDOLVP´DQG³5HDOLVWLFQHVV´LQ-RKQ'DYLV':DGH+DQGVDQG 0lNLHGLWRUV 7KH+DQGERRNRI(FRQRPLF0HWKRGRORJ\&KHOWHQKDP(GZDUG (OJDU SS ,DQ+DFNLQJ³([SHULPHQWDWLRQDQG6FLHQWLILF5HDOLVP´LQLQ%R\G&DVSHUDQG 7URXWHGLWRUV 7KH3KLORVRSK\RI6FLHQFHFK 'DQLHO+DXVPDQ³3UREOHPVZLWK5HDOLVPDERXW(FRQRPLFV´ (FRQRPLFVDQG 3KLORVRSK\ SS 7RQ\/DZVRQ³:KDW+DV5HDOLVP*RWWR'R:LWK,W´(FRQRPLFVDQG3KLORVRSK\ SS 15HGXFWLRQLVPDQG0LFURIRXQGDWLRQV $ODQ*DUILQNHO³5HGXFWLRQLVP´LQLQ%R\G&DVSHUDQG7URXWHGLWRUV 7KH 3KLORVRSK\RI6FLHQFHFK -RKQ:DWNLQV³0HWKRGRORJLFDO,QGLYLGXDOLVPDQG6RFLDO7HQGHQFLHV´LQLQ%R\G &DVSHUDQG7URXWHGLWRUV 7KH3KLORVRSK\RI6FLHQFHFK 0DDUWHQ-DQVVHQ³0LFURIRXQGDWLRQV´LQ-RKQ'DYLV':DGH+DQGVDQG0lNL HGLWRUV 7KH+DQGERRNRI(FRQRPLF0HWKRGRORJ\&KHOWHQKDP(GZDUG(OJDU SS :HHNO\6KRUW$VVLJQPHQWV 0RUHGHWDLOHGLQVWUXFWLRQVLQFOXGLQJGHWDLOVRIHDFKZHHN¶VUHDGLQJVDQGGXHGDWHV FDQEHIRXQGRQWKH6KRUW:HHNO\$VVLJQPHQWVOLQNRQWKHFRXUVHZHEVLWH $QDO\WLFDO3DSHUV 0RUHGHWDLOHGLQVWUXFWLRQVFDQEHIRXQGRQWKH$QDO\WLFDO3DSHUVOLQNRQWKHFRXUVH ZHEVLWH$VVLJQPHQWVDQGGXHGDWHVDUHLQGLFDWHGEHORZ 'XH0RQGD\ )HEUXDU\ (LWKHU $³8OWLPDWHO\-RKQ1HYLOOH.H\QHV0LOO5REELQVDQG)ULHGPDQKDYHWKHVDPH YLHZRIWKHQDWXUHRIHFRQRPLFV´'RWKH\"'LVFXVV 3KLO(FRQ7KH3KLORVRSK\DQG0HWKRGRORJ\RI(FRQRPLFV 6\OODEXV 6SULQJ %5HDG :LOOLDP-)UD]HU-UDQG/DZUHQFH$%RODQG³$Q(VVD\RQWKH)RXQGDWLRQV RI)ULHGPDQ V0HWKRGRORJ\´$PHULFDQ(FRQRPLF5HYLHZYROQR 0DUFKSS DQG .HYLQ'+RRYHU³0HWKRGRORJ\$&RPPHQWRQ)UD]HUDQG%RODQG,,´ $PHULFDQ(FRQRPLF5HYLHZYROQR6HSWHPEHUSS (YDOXDWHWKHGHEDWHEHWZHHQ)UD]HUDQG%RODQGDQG+RRYHU,V)ULHGPDQDQ LQVWUXPHQWDOLVW",VLQVWUXPHQWDOLVPVRXQG" )HHOIUHHWRGUDZRQPDWHULDOVXVHG LQZHHNO\GLVFXVVLRQV >%HFDUHIXODQ\RQHWDNLQJP\VLGHRIWKHPDWWHUZKLOH VXEMHFWWRVSHFLDOVFUXWLQ\@ 'XH0RQGD\ 0DUFK (LWKHU $,V3RSSHU¶VVLWXDWLRQDOORJLFFRPSDWLEOHZLWKKLVIDOVLILFDWLRQLVP" % ,Q³7KH/RJLFRIWKH6RFLDO6FLHQFHV´ S 3RSSHUZULWHV³2XUPRWLYHVDQG HYHQRXUSXUHO\VFLHQWLILFLGHDOVLQFOXGLQJWKHLGHDORIDGLVLQWHUHVWHGVHDUFKIRU WUXWKDUHGHHSO\DQFKRUHGLQH[WUDVFLHQWLILFDQGLQSDUWLQUHOLJLRXV HYDOXDWLRQV7KXVWKHµREMHFWLYH¶RUWKHµYDOXHIUHH¶VFLHQWLVWLVKDUGO\WKHLGHDO VFLHQWLVW:LWKRXWSDVVLRQZHFDQDFKLHYHQRWKLQJ±FHUWDLQO\QRWLQSXUH VFLHQFH7KHSKUDVHµWKHSDVVLRQIRUWKHWUXWK¶LVQRPHUHPHWDSKRU´ ,Q 7KH1DWXUHDQG6LJQLILFDQFHRI(FRQRPLF6FLHQFH SS 5REELQV ZULWHV³$QGWKXVLQWKHODVWDQDO\VLV(FRQRPLFVGRHVGHSHQGLIQRWIRULWV H[LVWHQFHDWOHDVWIRULWVVLJQLILFDQFHRQDQXOWLPDWHYDOXDWLRQ ± WKHDIILUPDWLRQ WKDWUDWLRQDOLW\DQGWKHDELOLW\WRFKRRVHZLWK
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orthodox and Heterodox Economics in Recent Economic Methodology
    Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, Volume 8, Issue 1, Spring 2015, pp. 61-81. http://ejpe.org/pdf/8-1-art-4.pdf Orthodox and heterodox economics in recent economic methodology D. WADE HANDS University of Puget Sound Abstract: This paper discusses the development of the field of economic methodology during the last few decades emphasizing the early influence of the “shelf” of Popperian philosophy and the division between neoclassical and heterodoX economics. It argues that the field of methodology has recently adopted a more naturalistic approach focusing primarily on the “new pluralist” subfields of experimental economics, behavioral economics, neuroeconomics, and related subjects. Keywords: orthodoX, heterodoX, neoclassical, economic theory, economic methodology JEL Classification: A12, B41, B49, B50 Myself when young did have ambition to contribute to the growth of social science. At the end, I am more interested in having less nonsense posing as knowledge (Frank Knight, 1956). At the time I was finishing graduate school, there was no real “field” of economic methodology. There were of course methodological writings by influential economists (e.g., Robbins 1932, 1952; Friedman 1953; Samuelson 1964, 1965), but these works were seldom of the same intellectual quality as the research that had made these economists famous as economists. There were also brief discussions of economics in influential books on the philosophy of science (e.g., Hempel 1965, AUTHOR’S NOTE: This paper began as a lecture delivered at the XVII Meeting on Epistemology of the Economic Sciences, School of Economic Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, October 6-7, 2011. It was subsequently published in Perspectives on epistemology of economics: essays on methodology of economics (Lazzarini and Weisman 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Oikos and Economy: the Greek Legacy in Economic Thought
    Oikos and Economy: The Greek Legacy in Economic Thought GREGORY CAMERON In the study of the history of economic thought, there has been a tendency to take the meaning of the term “economics” for granted. As a consequence, when considering economic thought in ancient Greece, we turn to what the Greeks said about wealth, about money or about interest. This seems relatively straightforward. Problems emerge when we consider that the term “economics” had a different meaning in ancient Greece than it does today. As a rule, we project back onto history what we mean by “economics” and more or less ignore what it meant during the period in question. On one level, there is nothing wrong with this way of proceeding; after all we have no choice, ultimately, but to study the past with the concepts that are at our disposal. But the procedure can have certain drawbacks. The tendency of positive investigations is that they risk overlooking the kinds of transformations that give rise to our own concerns and even what is essential to our own thought and assumptions. The term “economics” has a long and varied history; the following is a brief attempt to turn things on their head and consider the history of economics not from the perspective of the modern notion of economics, but from the perspective of its ancient Greek ancestor and to begin to indicate the non-obvious ways in which the Greek legacy continues to inform even our most recent economies. As such, while brief mention is made of some modern economic historians, the primary focus is on the meaning of PhaenEx 3, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Positivism and the Separation of Law and Economics
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 1996 Positivism and the Separation of Law and Economics Avery W. Katz Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, and the Law and Economics Commons Recommended Citation Avery W. Katz, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Economics, 94 MICH. L. REV. 2229 (1996). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/610 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POSITIVISM AND THE SEPARATION OF LAW AND ECONOMICS Avery Wiener Katz* INTRODUCION The modem field of law and economics - that is, the application of economic analysis to legal subjects other than trade and business reg- ulation - is now over thirty years old, but it remains controversial in the legal academy and, to a lesser extent, in the profession at large. Since its beginnings in the early 1960s, the economic approach has pro- voked substantial opposition and antagonism. The sources of this resis- tance, however, are a matter of dispute. Many economists and economi- cally influenced lawyers attribute it to more traditional lawyers' reluctance to learn a new and unfamiliar set of concepts and techniques. Critics of the economic approach offer a variety of other explanations. Some are skeptical of the utility of abstract theoretical modeling in the social sciences,' others object to economics' central behavioral assump- tion of rational choice,2 still others criticize economics' supposed liber- tarian politics and ideological allegiance to laissez-faire.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle & Locke: Ancients and Moderns on Economic Theory & The
    Xavier University Exhibit Honors Bachelor of Arts Undergraduate 2015-4 Aristotle & Locke: Ancients and Moderns on Economic Theory & the Best Regime Andrew John Del Bene Xavier University - Cincinnati Follow this and additional works at: http://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Ancient Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Del Bene, Andrew John, "Aristotle & Locke: Ancients and Moderns on Economic Theory & the Best Regime" (2015). Honors Bachelor of Arts. Paper 9. http://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab/9 This Capstone/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Bachelor of Arts by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Aristotle & Locke: Ancients and Moderns on Economic Theory & the Best Regime Andrew John Del Bene Honors Bachelor of Arts – Senior Thesis Project Director: Dr. Timothy Quinn Readers: Dr. Amit Sen & Dr. E. Paul Colella Course Director: Dr. Shannon Hogue I respectfully submit this thesis project as partial fulfillment for the Honors Bachelor of Arts Degree. I dedicate this project, and my last four years as an HAB at Xavier University, to my grandfather, John Francis Del Bene, who taught me that in life, you get out what you put in. Del Bene 1 Table of Contents Introduction — Philosophy and Economics, Ancients and Moderns 2 Chapter One — Aristotle: Politics 5 Community: the Household and the Πόλις 9 State: Economics and Education 16 Analytic Synthesis: Aristotle 26 Chapter Two — John Locke: The Two Treatises of Government 27 Community: the State of Nature and Civil Society 30 State: Economics and Education 40 Analytic Synthesis: Locke 48 Chapter Three — Aristotle v.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy John B
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Economics Faculty Research and Publications Economics, Department of 1-1-2004 Introduction to The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy John B. Davis Marquette University, [email protected] Alain Marciano Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne Jochen Runde University of Cambridge Published version. "Introduction," in The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy. Eds. John B. Davis, Alain Marciano and Jochen Runde. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004: xii-xxvii. DOI. © 2004 Edward Elgar Publishing. Used with permission. Introduction John Davis, Alain Marciano and Jochen Runde The closing decades of the twentieth century saw a dramatic increase in interest in the role of philosophical ideas in economics. The period also saw a significant expansion in scholarly investigation into the different connections between economics and philosophy, as seen in the emergence of new journals, professional associations, conferences, seminar series, websites, research networks, teaching methods, and interdisciplinary collaboration. One of the results of this set of developments has been a remarkable distillation in thinking about philosophy and economics around a number of key subjects and themes. The goal of this Companion to Economics and Philosophy is to exhibit and explore a number of these areas of convergence. The volume is accordingly divided into three parts, each of which highlights a leading area of scholarly concern. They are: political economy conceived as political philosophy, the methodology and epistemology of economics, and social ontology and the ontology of economics. The authors of the chapters in the volume were chosen on the basis of their having made distinctive and innovative contributions to their respective areas of expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Atheoretical Turn in Economics 1
    Form and Function: Evaluating the Atheoretical Turn in Economics Meredith M. Paker Nuffield College University of Oxford meredith.paker@nuffield.ox.ac.uk Prepared for Philosophy and Methodology of Economics Economic and Social History June 2017 1 Introduction Since the late 1990s, research in economics has increasingly employed “atheoretical” exper- imental and quasi-experimental methods.1 As laboratory and field experiments became more accepted in the discipline, paralleling the rise of behavioral economics, statistical quasi-experimental methods were developed and standardized. These tools, including difference-in-difference, regression discontinuity, and instrumental variable approaches, have made quasi-experimental analyses of natural or institutional variation more ac- cessible, popular, and persuasive. Experimentally-based approaches are now common throughout the discipline and are especially prominent in empirical microeconomic re- search, where they have displaced structural and theory-driven work in fields such as labor, education, and public economics.2 Two main reasons are often cited for the growth of work in experimental economics. First, experimentally-based methods are seen as “atheoretic” when compared with tradi- 1. “Economists are prone to fads, and the latest is machine learning,” The Economist, November 2016, http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21710800-big-data-have-led- latest-craze-economic-research-economists-are-prone, In addition to an increase in machine learning methods, the figure shows a remarkable upward trend in laboratory, randomized control trial, difference-in-difference, and regression discontinuity approaches. 2. John Rust, “Comments on ‘Structural vs. Atheoretic Approaches to Econometrics’ by Michael Keane,” Journal of Econometrics 156, no. 1 (2010): p. 21. 1 tional structural methods that make a priori parametric assumptions.3 Second, structural modeling is difficult, time consuming, and less likely to be appreciated by academic jour- nals looking for intuitive and easily-explained work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synthesis of Law and Economics John Cirace
    SMU Law Review Volume 44 | Issue 3 Article 4 1990 A Synthesis of Law and Economics John Cirace Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation John Cirace, A Synthesis of Law and Economics, 44 Sw L.J. 1139 (1990) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol44/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. A SYNTHESIS OF LAW AND ECONOMICS by John Cirace I. INTRODUCTION ~E purpose of this Article is to effect a synthesis of law and econom- is that is acceptable to both lawyers and economists; in other words, 1 2 r1.aosynthesis acceptable to those who think like and have values of lawyers as well as those who think like3 and have values4 of economists. Section One discusses the criticisms that lawyers and economists make of each other's values and methodology, and outlines a way to synthesize these conflicting values and different methodologies. * Professor of Economics, The City University of New York; Adjunct Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School. Harvard University, B.A., 1962; Stanford Law School, J.D., 1967; Columbia University, Ph.D., 1975. I wish to thank the students in my Law & Econom- ics classes at Brooklyn Law School, Spring, 1989 and Spring, 1990; their unremitting criticism of economic analysis of law for its nearly total disregard of equitable considerations continu- ally forced me to rethink my assumptions and approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Does Methodology Matter for Economics? Reviewed Work(S)
    Review: Why Does Methodology Matter for Economics? Reviewed Work(s): The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists explain. by Mark Blaug's The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. by Daniel Hausman's Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns. by Alexander Rosenberg The Principles of Economics: Some Lies My Teachers told me. by Lawrence A. Boland Kevin D. Hoover The Economic Journal, Vol. 105, No. 430. (May, 1995), pp. 715-734. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%28199505%29105%3A430%3C715%3AWDMMFE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7 The Economic Journal is currently published by Royal Economic Society. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/res.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations.
    [Show full text]
  • Presenting Complex Economic Theories to Judges 2008
    Presenting Complex Economic Theories to Judges 2008 Unclassified DAF/COMP(2008)31 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 16-Dec-2008 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English, French DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE Unclassified DAF/COMP(2008)31 Cancels & replaces the same document of 02 December 2008 TECHNIQUES FOR PRESENTING COMPLEX ECONOMIC THEORIES TO JUDGES French English, JT03257559 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DAF/COMP(2008)31 FOREWORD This document comprises proceedings in the original languages of a Roundtable on Techniques for Presenting Complex Economic Theories to Judges held by the Competition Committee (Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement) in February 2008. It is published under the responsibility of the Secretary General of the OECD to bring information on this topic to the attention of a wider audience. This compilation is one of a series of publications entitled "Competition Policy Roundtables". PRÉFACE Ce document rassemble la documentation dans la langue d'origine dans laquelle elle a été soumise, relative à une table ronde sur les Techniques Permettant d’Exposer des Théories Economiques Complexes à des Juges qui s'est tenue en février 2008 dans le cadre du Comité de la concurrence (Groupe de Travail No. 3 sur la coopération et l’application de la loi). Il est publié sous la responsabilité du Secrétaire général de l'OCDE, afin de porter à la connaissance d'un large public les éléments d'information qui ont été réunis à cette occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy, Politics and Economics BA UCAS Code: LV12 for Students Entering Part 1 in 2013/4
    Philosophy, Politics and Economics BA UCAS code: LV12 For students entering Part 1 in 2013/4 Awarding Institution: University of Reading Teaching Institution: University of Reading Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Philosophy, Politics and Economics Faculty: Arts, Humanities and Social Science Faculty Programme length: 3 years Date of specification: 20/Jun/2014 Programme Director: Dr Severin Schroeder Programme Advisor: Prof Geoff Meen Board of Studies: Philosophy Accreditation: Summary of programme aims All three Departments share the aims and objectives laid down for the Reading graduate in the University's Strategy for Teaching and Learning. The overall aim of the programme is not only to provide a grounding in the subjects covered, but to give students the opportunity to connect the knowledge obtained in the different subjects to enrich their understanding of each. The Philosophy strand of the programme specifically aims to provide a grounding in the subject, enabling students to examine critically fundamental beliefs about truth and reality, right and wrong, to comprehend concepts essential for philosophical investigation, to develop an understanding of central philosophical problems, texts and figures, to develop an aptitude and enthusiasm for the subject, to engender a sense of belonging to a community of enquiry, and to prepare where appropriate for postgraduate study. The Politics strand aims to give students an appreciation of the normative, methodological and institutional issues involved in the study of politics in relation to the study of politics in relation to one of the three main subfields of the discipline: political philosophy, comparative government and international relations. Students focus on compulsory modules in international relations and associated optional modules.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2015 CURRICULUM VITAE of KENNETH WILLIAM STIKKERS
    July 2015 CURRICULUM VITAE OF KENNETH WILLIAM STIKKERS Department of Philosophy—Mailcode 4505 Office: (618) 536-6641 Southern Illinois University FAX: (618) 453-7428 Carbondale, IL 62901 e-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D., Philosophy, DePaul University, 1982, with Distinction Dissertation: "Toward a Sociology of Space: An Analysis of Spatial Experience in Technological Society, with Special Attention to the Phenomenology of Max Scheler" Advisor: Professor Manfred S. Frings M.A., Philosophy, DePaul University, 1975 Thesis: "The Radical Empiricism of William James: Philosophical Basis for an Age of Reform" Advisor: Professor Edward Allemand M.A., American Studies Program, University of Minnesota, 1972-1973 B.A., Sec. Ed., Honors Program, summa cum laude, Social Science, DePaul University, 1972 Honors Thesis: "A History of Black Economic Development, Reconstruction to 1905" PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Southern Illinois University Carbondale Professor, Philosophy, August 1997 to present; Chair, August 1997 to August 2003 Professor, Africana Studies, August 2010 to present Courses: Dissertation Research; Supervision of Graduate Assistant Instructors; Teaching Practicum; Introduction to Teaching and the Profession; Philosophies of Liberation, Theories of Community, American and Continental; Continental Personalism; Hermeneutics: Theories of Interpretation, American and Continental; Max Scheler; Michel Foucault; William James; American Idealism; W. E. B. Du Bois and His Contemporaries; History of American Women Philosophers; American Puritanism;
    [Show full text]
  • Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Caldwell, Bruce Working Paper Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2012-09 Provided in Cooperation with: Center for the History of Political Economy at Duke University Suggested Citation: Caldwell, Bruce (2012) : Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought, CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2012-09, Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE), Durham, NC This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149691 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences),
    [Show full text]