Tasmabrochus, a New Spider Genus from Tasmania, Australia (Araneae, Amphinectidae, Tasmarubriinae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tasmabrochus, a New Spider Genus from Tasmania, Australia (Araneae, Amphinectidae, Tasmarubriinae) 2002. The Journal of Arachnology 30:219±226 TASMABROCHUS, A NEW SPIDER GENUS FROM TASMANIA, AUSTRALIA (ARANEAE, AMPHINECTIDAE, TASMARUBRIINAE) Valerie Todd Davies: Queensland Museum, P.O. Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Three species of Tasmabrochus new genus are described. The new species are T. cranstoni (type species), T. montanus and T. turnerae. They are placed with Tasmarubrius in a new subfamily Tasmarubriinae in the Amphinectidae. Keywords: Taxonomy, Australia, new species, Gondwanan The spiders here placed in the new genus considered it a subfamily of the Amaurobi- Tasmabrochus were prominent among collec- idae. It is a well de®ned group of genera tions of Tasmanian spiders when describing found in South and Central America and in Tasmarubrius (Davies 1998a). Before pro- Australia. Davies (1998b) placed it in the Am- ceeding, I shall trace the history of Amphi- phinectidae as the closest available family in necta Simon 1898 and the Amphinectidae. the cladistic analysis. This was supported by Amphinecta was described from New Zealand Griswold et al. (1999) in their analysis of the (type species A. decemmaculata Simon 1898) cribellate entelegyne spiders. In their clado- and placed in the Agelenidae. Lehtinen (1967) gram Maniho Marples 1959, the amphinectid transferred it to the Amaurobiidae: Desinae exemplar and Metaltella Mello-LeitaÄo 1931 and at the same time placed Rubrius milvinus were a sister group to the Desidae. Simon 1903 from Tasmania into a new com- A new subfamily Tasmarubriinae is estab- bination, Amphinecta milvina. Forster & Wil- lished for the reception of Tasmarubrius and ton (1973) raised Amphinecta to a new family, the new genus described here, Tasmabrochus. the Amphinectidae, which comprised sixteen It is interesting to note that Churchill (1993: genera from New Zealand, thirteen of which 477) listed the male as Mamoea sp., an am- were new. They dismissed Lehtinen's view phinectid from New Zealand and the female that the Tasmanian spider A. milvina belonged as `gen. A sp.2'. As there is no clear diagnosis in Amphinecta or the Amphinectidae. Davies of the family Amphinectidae, the subfamily (1998a) placed the Tasmanian R. milvinus in will be compared with the type genus, Am- the genus Tasmarubrius and assigned it to the phinecta. Amaurobiidae. However a recent cladistic analysis (Davies & Lambkin 2001) which in- METHODS cluded the type species of Amaurobius, A. fe- Nearly all of the collection was from pit- nestralis (StroÈm 1768) from Europe, among fall (PF) trapping in both the coastal heathland Australasian exemplars found the placement of north-eastern Tasmania and in the north- of Amaurobius ambiguous. In half (eighteen) western highlands region. Notation of spines of the MPTs it formed a third basal clade with follows Platnick & Shadab (1975); measure- Badumna (Davies & Lambkin 2001, ®g. 10) ments are in millimeters; the left male palp is while in the other half it was sister to a large used in illustrations. The usual abbreviations clade that did not include Tasmarubrius. Thus are used for body length, eyes, spinnerets and Tasmarubrius is here provisionally transferred spigots. Abbreviations on ®gures are ex- to its most closely related family, Amphinec- plained in the legend. tidae. Specimens are deposited in the following The Metaltellinae is also considered a sub- museums: Queen Victoria Museum, Launces- family of the Amphinectidae. Lehtinen (1967) ton, Tasmania (QVM), Tasmanian Museum, 219 220 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Hobart, Tasmania (TM) and Queensland Mu- Etymology.ÐThe generic name is a com- seum, Brisbane, Queensland (QM). bination of `Tasma' from Tasmania and Latin `brochus', a projection, referring to the very SYSTEMATICS prominent tegular apophysis of the male palp. Tasmarubriinae new subfamily It is considered masculine in gender. Diagnosis.ÐMembers of the genus resem- Diagnosis.ÐLike Amphinecta, the tasma- ble Tasmarubrius in having two retromarginal rubriines are three-clawed ground living ecri- and two promarginal cheliceral teeth, and a bellates found under logs and rocks. They large ®xed tegular apophysis and cymbial share the following characters: geniculate che- apophyses in the male. Tasmabrochus differs licerae with two retromarginal teeth; cuticle from Tasmarubrius in having lateral teeth on ridged and without feathery hairs; preening the epigynum and lacking lateral epigynal combs present distally on some metatarsi; protuberances. The long ®xed tegular apoph- small membranous conductor; movable me- ysis is in a ratio of 1:0.7 to the median apoph- dian apophysis and a distal RTA and dorso- ysis whereas they are about equal (1:0.9) in retrolateral apophysis. They differ from Am- Tasmarubrius. Cymbium with small retrola- phinecta in the division of the tegulum into teral paracymbium and a posterior prolateral proximal and distal parts, a short thick em- extension whereas Tasmarubrius has a large bolus, simple insemination ducts and cymbial paracymbium and lacks prolateral extension. apophyses. In contrast, Amphinecta has a Preening combs on metatarsi III and IV, ab- long, coiled spiniform embolus, loosely coiled sent on II; whereas they are present on II, III insemination ducts and lacks cymbial apoph- and IV in Tasmarubrius. yses. Description.ÐReddish brown carapace, al- Tasmabrochus cranstoni new species most glabrous; dark brown abdomen with in- Figs. 1±13, 15±19, Table 1 distinct pattern of six pairs of pale spots, ven- Types.ÐAustralia: Tasmania. Holotype ter pale mottled with brown. From above, male, dry sclerophyll, Peters Link Rd, NE posterior eye row procurved (Fig. 2), anterior Tasmania, 418089S, 1488079E, PF, site B2.2, row slightly so; from the front both rows 22±27 May 1993, P. Cranston, J. Trueman strongly procurved. AME reduced. Geniculate (QM S42321). Paratypes: 1 /, same locality, chelicerae (Fig. 1) with two retromarginal and date, collectors as holotype, site B1.2 (QM two promarginal teeth (Fig 4). Sternum longer S42322); 2 ?, as above, site B1.1 (QM than wide, pointed posteriorly. Legs 4123: all S42323); 1 ?, site B1.2 (QM S42324); 1 ?, tibiae and metatarsi have paired ventral spines site B2.1 (QM S42325); 1 /, site B3.2 (QM which are longer on the posterior legs. Single S42326); 1 /, site B5.1 (QM S42327); 1 ?, row of trichobothria on metatarsi and tarsi; coastal heath, Eddystone Pt. 418009S, tarsal organ slit-like (Fig. 12). Epigynum with 1488199E, PF, site C4.1, 22±27 May 1993, P. lateral gonopores. Tegulum of male palp with Cranston, J. Trueman (QM S42328); 1 ?, proximal and distal divisions, the latter bear- same locality and collectors, site C3.2, 23±28 ing a short thick embolus, a small membra- Aug.1993 (QM S42329); 1 ?, C4.1, 23±28 neous conductor, a large movable elongate Aug.1993 (QM S42330); 1 ? C4.2 (QM median apophysis and usually a ®xed tegular S42331); ?, Leptospermum wet heath, An- apophysis. Cymbium with small bulge on re- son's Bay Rd, 418029S, 1488149E, site D2.1, trolateral edge and proximal projection (par- 23±28 Aug.1993, P. Cranston, J. Trueman acymbium). Palpal tibia with large retrolateral (QM S42332); 2 /, in regeneration area, old excavation with ventro-and dorso-retrolateral Chum Dam, 10±15 km NE Pioneer; branches. Small D-shaped colulus. Two major 418039S,1488019E, 200m, PF, October 1989± ampullate spigots on ALS, the anterior larger April 1990, Forestry Department (TM J3260); than the posterior; the latter reduced to a nub- 4 ?, as above (TM J3261); 1 ?, Freycinet NP, bin in male. 428099S, 1488189E, eucalypt forest, 27 May 1996, J. Boutin (TM J3265); 1 /, Gray, rot- Tasmabrochus new genus ting log on dry hillside, 418389S, 1488139E, 13 Type species.ÐTasmabrochus cranstoni Aug. 1974, R. Mesibov (TM J3308). new species. Etymology.ÐThe speci®c epithet is a pa- DAVIESÐA NEW AUSTRALIAN AMAUROBIOID 221 Figures 1±11.ÐTasmabrochus cranstoni new species. 1, 2. Female carapace. 1, Lateral; 2, Dorsal. 3, Abdomen, ventral. 4, Chelicera, ventral. 5±7, Male palp. 5, Prolaterodorsal. 6, Ventral. 7, Retrolateral. 8± 11, Epigynum. 8, Dorsal. 9, Dorsal cleared. 10, Ventral. 11, Posteroventral. Abbreviations: apb: angular prolateral bulge; ma, median apophysis; ta, tegular apophysis. tronym in honor of Dr. Peter Cranston, one of (Fig. 6) and the blunt prolongation of poste- the collectors of the holotype. rior prolateral cymbium (Fig. 5). Diagnosis.ÐMales can be recognized by Description.ÐMale: CL 3.8, CW 2.5, AL the angular bulge on the prolateral tegulum 3.7, AW 2.1. Pale cardiac patch on abdomen, 222 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 12±19.Ð12, 13, 15±19, Male Tasmabrochus cranstoni new species. 12, Tarsal organ and tri- chobothrium, leg I; 13, Two preening combs distal to spine, metatarsus III; 15, ALS (l) with one MAP and nubbin; 16, PMS (l) with mAP; 17, PLS (r) with large spigot among aciniforms; 18, Palp, ventral; 19, Palp, prolateral. 14, Female Tasmarubrius turnerae new species, ALS (r) with two MAP medially. DAVIESÐA NEW AUSTRALIAN AMAUROBIOID 223 Table 1. Leg lengths of male (female) Tasmabrochus cranstoni new species. I II III IV Femur 2.8 (3.0) 2.5 (2.5) 2.2 (2.2) 2.8 (3.0) Patella and tibia 3.8 (3.8) 3.0 (3.3) 2.6 (2.8) 3.8 (3.8) Metatarsus 2.6 (2.1) 2.2 (2.0) 2.4 (2.3) 3.4 (2.9) Tarsus 1.6 (1.2) 1.2 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.3 (1.1) Total 10.8 (10.1) 8.9 (8.8) 8.2 (8.3) 11.3 (10.8) venter mottled. Ratio of AME: ALE: PME: posterior, about 25 piriforms. PMS with one PLE is 5:9:7:9. Labium about as wide as long; large minor ampullate spigot. sternum longer than wide. Legs 4123 (Table Females varied in length between 7.5±10.8. 1). Notation of spines. Femora: I, D110, P002; II, D110, P001; III D110, P001, R001; IV, Tasmabrochus montanus new species D110, P001, R001.
Recommended publications
  • Redescriptions of Nuisiana Arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea Reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae)
    Zootaxa 2739: 41–50 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae) COR J. VINK1,2,5, BRIAN M. FITZGERALD3, PHIL J. SIRVID3 & NADINE DUPÉRRÉ4 1Biosecurity Group, AgResearch, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] 2Entomology Research Museum, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand. 3Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 4Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York New York 10024, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author Abstract Two New Zealand endemic spider species, Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) (Desidae) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Stiphidiidae), are redescribed, including notes on their distribution and DNA sequences from the mitochon- drial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1. Based on morphological evidence and mitochondrial DNA sequences, Mata- chia magna Forster 1970 is a junior synonym of Nuisiana arboris, and Nanocambridgea grandis Blest & Vink 2000 is a junior synonym of Cambridgea reinga. Two forms of male morph in C. reinga are recorded. Key words: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI), DNA, Matachia, new synonymy, New Zealand, Nanocambridgea Introduction New Zealand’s spider fauna is diverse with an estimated 1990 species, of which 93% are endemic (Paquin et al. 2010). Most of the 1126 named species were described during the last 60 years and about 60% were described by one man, Ray Forster (Patrick et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae, Zorocratidae)
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 3579, 44 pp., 119 figures, 4 maps June 28, 2007 A Revision of the Spider Genus Zorocrates Simon (Araneae, Zorocratidae) NORMAN I. PLATNICK1, AND DARRELL UBICK2 ABSTRACT The spider genus Zorocrates is revised, and comprises at least 31 species found from the southern United States south to Central America; it provides a notable example of the loss of a functional cribellum within a relatively small (but seemingly monophyletic) group of species. Two specific names are removed from synonymy: Z. gnaphosoides O. P.-Cambridge and Z. mordax O. P.- Cambridge (from Z. fuscus Simon and Z. mistus O. P.-Cambridge, respectively). Two other specific names are newly synonymized: Z. isolatus Gertsch and Davis, with Z. unicolor (Banks), and Z. petersi Kraus, with Z. gnaphosoides O. P.-Cambridge. Males are newly described for Z. badius Simon and Z. pictus Simon; females are newly described for Z. karli Gertsch and Riechert. Twenty new species are described from Texas and Mexico. INTRODUCTION 21, just as an entry in a key couplet), to include the New World Zorocrates plus four The American spiders of the genus Old World genera that had been placed by Zorocrates Simon (1888) are of considerable Lehtinen in the Miturgidae instead. Because phylogenetic interest. They were originally the genus has never been revised, identifica- described as members of the Old World family tion of the specimens used as exemplars in Zoropsidae. Lehtinen (1967) transferred the modern phylogenetic studies, such as those of genus to the New World family Tengellidae, Griswold (1993), Silva (2003), Raven and but Griswold et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Notes on Amaurobius (Araneae: Amaurobiidae), Including the Description of a New Species
    Zootaxa 4718 (1): 047–056 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4718.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F484F4E-28C2-44E4-B646-58CBF375C4C9 Taxonomic notes on Amaurobius (Araneae: Amaurobiidae), including the description of a new species YURI M. MARUSIK1,2, S. OTTO3 & G. JAPOSHVILI4,5 1Institute for Biological Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str. 18, Magadan, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa 3GutsMuthsstr. 42, 04177 Leipzig, Germany. 4Institute of Entomology, Agricultural University of Georgia, Agmashenebeli Alley 13 km, 0159 Tbilisi, Georgia 5Invertebrate Research Center, Tetrtsklebi, Telavi municipality 2200, Georgia 6Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species, Amaurobius caucasicus sp. n., is described based on the holotype male and two male paratypes from Eastern Georgia. A similar species, A. hercegovinensis Kulczyński, 1915, known only from the original description is redescribed. The taxonomic status of Amaurobius species considered as nomina dubia and species described outside the Holarctic are also assessed. Amaurobius koponeni Marusik, Ballarin & Omelko, 2012, syn. n. described from northern India is a junior synonym of A. jugorum L. Koch, 1868 and Amaurobius yanoianus Nakatsudi, 1943, syn. n. described from Micronesia is synonymised with the titanoecid species Pandava laminata (Thorell, 1878) a species known from Eastern Africa to Polynesia. Considerable size variation in A. antipovae Marusik et Kovblyuk, 2004 is briefly discussed. Key words: Aranei, Asia, Caucasus, Georgia, Kakheti, misplaced, new synonym, nomen dubium, redescription Introduction Amaurobius C.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Atowards a PHYLOGENY of ENTELEGYNE SPIDERS (ARANEAE, ARANEOMORPHAE, ENTELEGYNAE)
    1999. The Journal of Arachnology 27:53-63 aTOWARDS A PHYLOGENY OF ENTELEGYNE SPIDERS (ARANEAE, ARANEOMORPHAE, ENTELEGYNAE) Charles E. Griswold1, Jonathan A. Coddington2, Norman I. Platnick3 and Raymond R. Forster4: 'Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118 USA; 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, NHB-105, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA; 3Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024 USA; 4McMasters Road, R.D. 1, Saddle Hill, Dunedin, New Zealand ABSTRACT. We propose a phylogeny for all entelegyne families with cribellate members based on a matrix of 137 characters scored for 43 exemplar taxa and analyzed under parsimony. The cladogram confirms the monophyly of Neocribellatae, Araneoclada, Entelegynae, and Orbiculariae. Lycosoidea, Amaurobiidae and some included subfamilies, Dictynoidea, and Amaurobioidea (sensu Forster & Wilton 1973) are polyphyletic. Phyxelidinae Lehtinen is raised to family level (Phyxelididae, NEW RANK). The family Zorocratidae Dahl 1913 is revalidated. A group including all entelegynes other than Eresoidea is weakly supported as the sister group of Orbiculariae. The true spiders or Araneomorphae (ara- Raven (1985) and Goloboff (1993a) for My- neae verae of Simon 1892) comprise more galomorphae (15 families); Coddington (1986, than 30,000 described species. The classifi- 1990a, b) for Orbiculariae (13 families) and cation of this group has undergone a revolu- Entelegynae; Platnick et al. (1991) on haplo- tion in the last 30 years, sparked by Lehtinen's gynes (17 families) and Araneomorphae; Gris- (1967) comprehensive reassessment of ara- wold et al. (1994, 1998) for Araneoidea (12 neomorph relationships and steered by Hen- families), and Griswold (1993) for Lycosoidea nig's phylogenetic systematics (Hennig 1966; and related families (11 families).
    [Show full text]
  • Martín J. Ramírez, Cristian Grismado & Theo Blick
    ARTÍCULO: NOTES ON THE SPIDER FAMILY AGELENIDAE IN SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) Martín J. Ramírez, Cristian Grismado & Theo Blick Abstract: The spider family Agelenidae is represented in southern South America only by three synanthropic, originally Palearctic species of Tegenaria: T. domestica (Clerck), T. pagana C. L. Koch and T. parietina (Fourcroy), the last of these newly recorded from the Western Hemisphere. The other records of Agelenidae in southern South America are misidentifications: Coreidon tropicum Mello-Leitão, from Brazil, is transferred to Strotarchus Simon (Miturgidae), Hicanodon cinerea Tullgren, from Argentina, is transferred to the Amaurobiidae, and Philoicides pallidus Mello-Leitão, from Argentina, is synonymized with Tegenaria pagana. Mevianops fragilis (Mello-Leitão) from Colombia, is synonymized with Tegenaria domestica. New South American records of Tegenaria ARTÍCULO: species are provided. The female genitalia of Hicanodon cinerea are illustrated. Key words: Araneae, Agelenidae, Miturgidae, Amaurobiidae, Tegenaria, taxonomy, South Notes on the spider family America. Agelenidae in southern South Taxonomy: America (Arachnida: Araneae) Tegenaria Latreille 1804, = Philoicides Mello-Leitão, 1944, new synonymy. Martín J. Ramírez, = Mevianops Mello-Leitão, 1941, new synonymy. Cristian Grismado Tegenaria domestica (Clerck 1757), Museo Argentino de Ciencias = Mevianops fragilis Mello- Leitão 1941, new synonymy. Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Tegenaria pagana C. L. Koch 1840, División Aracnología. = Philoicides
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Heterogeneity, Not Distance, Structures Montane Epigaeic Spider Assemblages in North-Western Patagonia (Argentina)
    Journal of Insect Conservation https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-0034-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Environmental heterogeneity, not distance, structures montane epigaeic spider assemblages in north-western Patagonia (Argentina) Santigo Aisen1 · Victoria Werenkraut1 · María E. González Márquez2 · Martín J. Ramírez2 · Adriana Ruggiero1 Received: 8 July 2017 / Accepted: 13 November 2017 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017 Abstract There is considerable controversy around the patterns and processes that influence spatial variation in taxonomic composition in mountain environments. We analysed elevational variation in the taxonomic composition of epigaeic spider assemblages across five mountains in north-western Patagonia (Argentina) to examine the relative importance of dispersal (distance) limitation and environmental heterogeneity on a regional scale. The distance limitation hypothesis predicts greater taxonomic similarity between sampling sites separated by short geographical distances than between mountain peaks separated by longer distances, a lack of indicator species of macro-habitats, and weak associations between spider species composition and environmental gradients. Alternatively, the environmental heterogeneity hypothesis predicts that taxonomic differentia- tion will occur over short distances along elevation gradients in association with the turnover in major habitats and change in environmental conditions, and that indicator species will be present. We collected spiders using 486 pitfall traps arranged in fifty-four 100-m2 grid plots of nine traps separated by ~ 100 m of elevation, from the base to the summit of each mountain. Multivariate analyses identified spider assemblages that were associated with macro-habitats rather than with mountains. Local environmental variation (mainly in vegetation cover), precipitation and soil characteristics influenced the spatial vari- ation in species composition.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Threat Classification System Lists
    New Zealand Threat Classification System lists 2005 Rod Hitchmough, Leigh Bull and Pam Cromarty (compilers) Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10420 The Terrace Wellington 6143, New Zealand Cover: Archey’s frog on fern, Whareorino, 2003. Photo: Paul Schilov. © Copyright January 2007, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 0–478–14128–9 This report was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing and layout by Amanda Todd. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. Individual copies are printed, and are also available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. Foreword New Zealand has some of the most ancient and fascinating species in the world (e.g. the tuatara). Many of our plants and animals are found nowhere else. However, since the arrival of humans about 1000 years ago, we have also been world leaders in rates of extinctions (particularly of land and freshwater birds, where nearly one third have been lost), and in our levels of threatened species—a legacy of a history of unsustainable harvest, habitat destruction and alien species introductions. Preventing the extinction of New Zealand’s unique plant and animal species is a critical element in the Government’s New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy; it is a responsibility we owe to the rest of the world, but this is not a small task.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spider Tree of Life: Phylogeny of Araneae Based on Target‐Gene
    Cladistics Cladistics 33 (2017) 574–616 10.1111/cla.12182 The spider tree of life: phylogeny of Araneae based on target-gene analyses from an extensive taxon sampling Ward C. Wheelera,*, Jonathan A. Coddingtonb, Louise M. Crowleya, Dimitar Dimitrovc,d, Pablo A. Goloboffe, Charles E. Griswoldf, Gustavo Hormigad, Lorenzo Prendinia, Martın J. Ramırezg, Petra Sierwaldh, Lina Almeida-Silvaf,i, Fernando Alvarez-Padillaf,d,j, Miquel A. Arnedok, Ligia R. Benavides Silvad, Suresh P. Benjamind,l, Jason E. Bondm, Cristian J. Grismadog, Emile Hasand, Marshal Hedinn, Matıas A. Izquierdog, Facundo M. Labarquef,g,i, Joel Ledfordf,o, Lara Lopardod, Wayne P. Maddisonp, Jeremy A. Millerf,q, Luis N. Piacentinig, Norman I. Platnicka, Daniele Polotowf,i, Diana Silva-Davila f,r, Nikolaj Scharffs, Tamas Szuts} f,t, Darrell Ubickf, Cor J. Vinkn,u, Hannah M. Woodf,b and Junxia Zhangp aDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024, USA; bSmithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution, NW Washington, DC 20560-0105, USA; cNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; dDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2029 G St., NW Washington, DC 20052, USA; eUnidad Ejecutora Lillo, FML—CONICET, Miguel Lillo 251, 4000, SM. de Tucuman, Argentina; fDepartment of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden State Park, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA; gMuseo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’—CONICET, Av. Angel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina; hThe Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA; iLaboratorio Especial de Colecßoes~ Zoologicas, Instituto Butantan, Av.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invertebrate Cave Fauna of Tasmania: Ecology and Conservation Biology
    THE INVERTEBRATE CAVE FAUNA OF TASMANIA: ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY by Stefan M. Eberhard, B. Sc. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the liegree of Master of Science at the University of Tasmania August 1992 This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other higher degree or graduate diploma in any tertiary institution, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. 10-0/A,AoL--k Stefan Eberhard, August 1992 Cave Fauna of Tasmania Summary The invertebrate cave fauna of Tasmania is reviewed, based on collections from more than 130 caves in 31 karst areas. These totals represent approximately 14% of the known caves and about one half of the cavernous karst areas in the State. The distributions, ecological and conservation status of all taxa are discussed. More than 150 species, representing some 130 families in five phyla were identified. Species in at least 34 genera can be classified as troglobites or stygobionts. The fauna includes rare species, and species which are phylogenetic relicts, or have Gondwanaland affinities. Many taxa are undescribed. More so than for mainland Australia, the Tasmanian cave fauna shows a pattern of similarity with the cave faunas of other glacial and periglacial regions such as New Zealand, Japan, United States and Europe. The disjunct distribution patterns shown by some genera of harvestmen and beetles support the Pleistocene-effect theory to explain the evolution of terrestrial troglobites.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae: Amaurobioidea)
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Gray, M. R., and H. M. Smith, 2002. Therlinya, a new genus of spiders from eastern Australia (Araneae: Amaurobioidea). Records of the Australian Museum 54(3): 293–312. [30 October 2002]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.54.2002.1368 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia © Copyright Australian Museum, 2002 Records of the Australian Museum (2002) Vol. 54: 293–312. ISSN 0067-1975 Therlinya, A New Genus of Spiders from Eastern Australia (Araneae: Amaurobioidea) MICHAEL R. GRAY* AND HELEN M. SMITH Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia [email protected] · [email protected] ABSTRACT. Therlinya, a new genus of cribellate amaurobioid spiders from eastern Australia, readily distinguished by its arched, unpatterned carapace, is described. It includes eleven new species: Therlinya kiah, T. foveolata, T. bellinger, T. horsemanae, T. wiangaree, T. ballata, T. vexillum, T. lambkinae, T. angusta, T. monteithi, and T. nasuta. All are forest dwelling species that build small sheet webs in sheltered microhabitats. Distribution maps and comments on relationships and biology are given. GRAY, MICHAEL R., & HELEN M. SMITH, 2002. Therlinya, a new genus of spiders from eastern Australia (Araneae: Amaurobioidea). Records of the Australian Museum 54(3): 293–312. Therlinya n.gen. is one of many sheet web building paroculus Simon, known only from the type female) which amaurobioid spider groups associated with forested coastal has the unusual cheliceral tooth pattern of 7+4 and a wide, and highland regions in eastern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Transformation from Muscular to Hydraulic Movements in Spider (Arachnida, Araneae) Genitalia: a Study Based on Histological Serial Sections
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 261:364–376 (2004) Evolutionary Transformation From Muscular to Hydraulic Movements in Spider (Arachnida, Araneae) Genitalia: a Study Based on Histological Serial Sections Bernhard A. Huber* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany ABSTRACT The male genitalia of 107 spider species adult males. They play an important role both in representing 73 families were serially sectioned and stud- directing the genital bulb into the female copulatory ied with an emphasis on muscles moving the genital bulb. opening and in putative courtship during copulation As a rule, most non-Entelegynae have two bulbal muscles, by rhythmical movements (Harm, 1931; Cooke, most Entelegyne have none, but many exceptions occur. 1966; Haupt, 1979; Huber and Eberhard, 1997). In Variation also occurs with regard to origin and attach- ment of bulbal muscles. There appears to be a trend to- “higher” spiders (Entelegynae), these muscles have wards a shift of the origin from proximal (Liphistius, Aty- long been thought to be absent (Cooke, 1970). In pus) to more distal palpal segments (Haplogynae). In most these spiders, bulbal movements result from the Entelegynae the muscular movement is replaced by hy- expansion of folded membranes connecting the var- draulic movement caused by expanding membranes (he- ious sclerites as well as from the elasticity of certain matodochae). Hematodochae probably permit increased components (van Helsdingen, 1965; Grasshoff, 1973; bulbal rotation and movements of higher complexity. New Loerbroks, 1984; Huber, 1993; Eberhard and Huber, evidence is presented arguing against Palpimanidae being 1998). The membranes (hematodochae) are ex- representatives of Entelegynae. Bulbal glands other than panded by hydraulics, i.e., by pressure increase gen- those discharging into the sperm duct (previously known erated primarily in the prosoma (Anderson and in Amaurobiidae and Dictynidae only) are described in Prestwich, 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Atowards a PHYLOGENY of ENTELEGYNE SPIDERS (ARANEAE, ARANEOMORPHAE, ENTELEGYNAE)
    1999. The Journal of Arachnology 27:53±63 aTOWARDS A PHYLOGENY OF ENTELEGYNE SPIDERS (ARANEAE, ARANEOMORPHAE, ENTELEGYNAE) Charles E. Griswold1, Jonathan A. Coddington2, Norman I. Platnick3 and Raymond R. Forster4: 1Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118 USA; 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, NHB-105, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA; 3Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024 USA; 4McMasters Road, R.D. 1, Saddle Hill, Dunedin, New Zealand ABSTRACT. We propose a phylogeny for all entelegyne families with cribellate members based on a matrix of 137 characters scored for 43 exemplar taxa and analyzed under parsimony. The cladogram con®rms the monophyly of Neocribellatae, Araneoclada, Entelegynae, and Orbiculariae. Lycosoidea, Amaurobiidae and some included subfamilies, Dictynoidea, and Amaurobioidea (sensu Forster & Wilton 1973) are polyphyletic. Phyxelidinae Lehtinen is raised to family level (Phyxelididae, NEW RANK). The family Zorocratidae Dahl 1913 is revalidated. A group including all entelegynes other than Eresoidea is weakly supported as the sister group of Orbiculariae. The true spiders or Araneomorphae (ara- Raven (1985) and Goloboff (1993a) for My- neae verae of Simon 1892) comprise more galomorphae (15 families); Coddington (1986, than 30,000 described species. The classi®- 1990a, b) for Orbiculariae (13 families) and cation of this group has undergone a revolu- Entelegynae; Platnick et al. (1991) on haplo- tion in the last 30 years, sparked by Lehtinen's gynes (17 families) and Araneomorphae; Gris- (1967) comprehensive reassessment of ara- wold et al. (1994, 1998) for Araneoidea (12 neomorph relationships and steered by Hen- families), and Griswold (1993) for Lycosoidea nig's phylogenetic systematics (Hennig 1966; and related families (11 families).
    [Show full text]