Peer-To-Peer File Sharing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Higher Education Opportunity Act Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Are you violating the law without realizing it? You could be if you are downloading music, movies or other copyright material without paying for them or without permission. Under copyright law, it is illegal to download or share copyrighted materials such as music or movies without the permission of the copyright owner. The record and movie industry in recent years has taken an aggressive approach to stopping illegal downloading and file sharing. This has put many students at the nation’s colleges and universities at some legal risk. There are many initiatives that address illegal file sharing. For instance, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has sent letters to colleges and universities that were found to have students in violation. These letters pointed to specific alleged instances of illegal file sharing. If you are downloading and sharing files with peer-to-peer file sharing software, this can be traceable and could result in a significant financial penalty to you. Besides, it’s stealing, and that’s illegal. Stealing music or movies just results in costs for everyone going up and since there are reasonably priced options. It’s just not necessary. The following is a list of some of the more popular P2P file-sharing software programs, but there are many, many others. If you choose to use one on your personal computer equipment, use caution. P2P programs can install spyware on your computer. This spyware could keep your P2P connections active even though you think you have stopped the application. The only way to be sure you have stopped any P2P software is to completely uninstall the application. Other P2P programs can turn your computer into a server without your knowledge, and then you can find yourself in violation of the law without realizing it. • Bearshare • Bodetella • Cooltella • Gnewtella • Gnut • Limewire • Mactella • MyTella • Newtella • PeaGnut • Reflector • SearchLord • Shareaza • Napster (and many variations of Napster) For more information, please visit the Information Technology webpage. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Will Sci-Hub Kill the Open Access Citation Advantage and (At Least for Now) Save Toll Access Journals?
Will Sci-Hub Kill the Open Access Citation Advantage and (at least for now) Save Toll Access Journals? David W. Lewis October 2016 © 2016 David W. Lewis. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Introduction It is a generally accepted fact that open access journal articles enjoy a citation advantage.1 This citation advantage results from the fact that open access journal articles are available to everyone in the word with an Internet collection. Thus, anyone with an interest in the work can find it and use it easily with no out-of-pocket cost. This use leads to citations. Articles in toll access journals on the other hand, are locked behind paywalls and are only available to those associated with institutions who can afford the subscription costs, or who are willing and able to purchase individual articles for $30 or more. There has always been some slippage in the toll access journal system because of informal sharing of articles. Authors will usually send copies of their work to those who ask and sometime post them on their websites even when this is not allowable under publisher’s agreements. Stevan Harnad and his colleagues proposed making this type of author sharing a standard semi-automated feature for closed articles in institutional repositories.2 The hashtag #ICanHazPDF can be used to broadcast a request for an article that an individual does not have access to.3 Increasingly, toll access articles are required by funder mandates to be made publically available, though usually after an embargo period.
[Show full text]
Piracy of Scientific Papers in Latin America: an Analysis of Sci-Hub Usage Data
Developing Latin America Piracy of scientific papers in Latin America: An analysis of Sci-Hub usage data Juan D. Machin-Mastromatteo Alejandro Uribe-Tirado Maria E. Romero-Ortiz This article was originally published as: Machin-Mastromatteo, J.D., Uribe-Tirado, A., and Romero-Ortiz, M. E. (2016). Piracy of scientific papers in Latin America: An analysis of Sci-Hub usage data. Information Development, 32(5), 1806–1814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266666916671080 Abstract Sci-Hub hosts pirated copies of 51 million scientific papers from commercial publishers. This article presents the site’s characteristics, it criticizes that it might be perceived as a de-facto component of the Open Access movement, it replicates an analysis published in Science using its available usage data, but limiting it to Latin America, and presents implications caused by this site for information professionals, universities and libraries. Keywords: Sci-Hub, piracy, open access, scientific articles, academic databases, serials crisis Scientific articles are vital for students, professors and researchers in universities, research centers and other knowledge institutions worldwide. When academic publishing started, academies, institutions and professional associations gathered articles, assessed their quality, collected them in journals, printed and distributed its copies; with the added difficulty of not having digital technologies. Producing journals became unsustainable for some professional societies, so commercial scientific publishers started appearing and assumed printing, sales and distribution on their behalf, while academics retained the intellectual tasks. Elsevier, among the first publishers, emerged to cover operations costs and profit from sales, now it is part of an industry that grew from the process of scientific communication; a 10 billion US dollar business (Murphy, 2016).
[Show full text]
Internet Evidence Finder Report
Patrick Leahy Center for Digital Investigation (LCDI) Internet Evidence Finder Report Written and Researched by Nick Murray 175 Lakeside Ave, Room 300A Phone: 802/865-5744 Fax: 802/865-6446 http://www.lcdi.champlin.edu July 2013 IEF Report 6/28/2013 Page 1 of 33 Patrick Leahy Center for Digital Investigation (LCDI) Disclaimer: This document contains information based on research that has been gathered by employee(s) of The Senator Patrick Leahy Center for Digital Investigation (LCDI). The data contained in this project is submitted voluntarily and is unaudited. Every effort has been made by LCDI to assure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in this report. However, LCDI nor any of our employees make no representation, warranty or guarantee in connection with this report and hereby expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from use of this data. Information in this report can be downloaded and redistributed by any person or persons. Any redistribution must maintain the LCDI logo and any references from this report must be properly annotated. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Prior Work: .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Purpose and Scope: ............................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Practical Anonymous Networking?
gap – practical anonymous networking? Krista Bennett Christian Grothoff S3 lab and CERIAS, Department of Computer Sciences, Purdue University [email protected], [email protected] http://www.gnu.org/software/GNUnet/ Abstract. This paper describes how anonymity is achieved in gnunet, a framework for anonymous distributed and secure networking. The main focus of this work is gap, a simple protocol for anonymous transfer of data which can achieve better anonymity guarantees than many traditional indirection schemes and is additionally more efficient. gap is based on a new perspective on how to achieve anonymity. Based on this new perspective it is possible to relax the requirements stated in traditional indirection schemes, allowing individual nodes to balance anonymity with efficiency according to their specific needs. 1 Introduction In this paper, we present the anonymity aspect of gnunet, a framework for secure peer-to-peer networking. The gnunet framework provides peer discovery, link encryption and message-batching. At present, gnunet’s primary application is anonymous file-sharing. The anonymous file-sharing application uses a content encoding scheme that breaks files into 1k blocks as described in [1]. The 1k blocks are transmitted using gnunet’s anonymity protocol, gap. This paper describes gap and how it attempts to achieve privacy and scalability in an environment with malicious peers and actively participating adversaries. The gnunet core API offers node discovery, authentication and encryption services. All communication between nodes in the network is confidential; no host outside the network can observe the actual contents of the data that flows through the network. Even the type of the data cannot be observed, as all packets are padded to have identical size.
[Show full text]
Pledge of Compliance of the Information Security Policy of Nagoya University
For submission Pledge of Compliance of the Information Security Policy of Nagoya University To the Director of Information and Communications Headquarters 1. As a member of the academic community of Nagoya University, I will carefully read the following two documents and hereby pledge to comply with the rules, regulations and guidelines specified therein. a. The Information Security Policy of Nagoya University (*1) b. The Network Usage Guidelines (User Information) of Nagoya University (*2) 2. I promise to take the “e-Learning Training Course on Information Security” (*3) within one month after enrollment. Examinee's number Date: School / Graduate School: Department: Name: Signature: Notice: Users who violate the Information Security Policy of Nagoya University and/or the Network Usage Guidelines (User Information) of Nagoya University may be subject to disciplinary action according to the Nagoya University General Rules, the Nagoya University Student Discipline Rules, etc. Downloading illegally distributed music and/or movie files is an infringement of copyright law. Those who download files illegally will be liable for compensation damages. Nagoya University will prohibit any illegal downloading of files through its computers and/or network. Nagoya University prohibits the use of file sharing software such as Winny, WinMX, Share, Gnutella (Cabos, LimeWire, Shareaza, etc.) and Xunlei. * If the use of said software is required for education or research purposes, prior approval by the Information and Communications Headquarters is mandatory. If users fail to take the “e-Learning Training Course on Information Security” within one month after enrollment or if they do not successfully complete the course, their access to the Nagoya University Portal, Nagoya University Mail, the Information Media System, and the Wireless LAN (NUWNET) will be suspended.
[Show full text]
Illegal File Sharing Notice Notice Is Sent to All Enrolled Students Via Email
Illegal File Sharing Notice Notice is sent to all enrolled students via email. Sample notification: Do YOU know the risks of illegal file sharing? The Recording Industry Association of America, the Motion Picture Association of America, the TV networks like NBC and ABC and other copyright holders will find you and sue you for illegal file sharing! It has happened to students here on campus, so don’t think that this won’t happen to you! Are YOU ready to pay $3,000 to $5,000 for illegally file sharing music, movies, software, etc.? Copyright law allows a copyright holder to sue someone who violates their rights for up to $150,000 per song, movie or TV episode. Students who have been fined at UWSP settled out of court for between $3,000 and $5,000. No one has that kind of cash just sitting around, so how can you avoid these fines? 1. Do NOT use peer‐to‐peer (P2P) file sharing programs like LimeWire, FrostWire, BitTorrent, Ares or Bearshare. 2. Educate yourself about illegal downloading and file sharing at: http://library.uwsp.edu/guides/Copyright/filesharing.htm 3. Use legal music, video and TV sites listed on this web site: http://www.educause.edu/Resources/Browse/LegalDownloading/33381 Here is what happens if YOU get caught for illegal file sharing on the UWSP campus: If you are a student caught while using our Residential Network, the campus wireless network or the campus wired network such as in a computer lab, you will lose your ability to use the Internet on campus for 7 days for a first offense.
[Show full text]
Downloading Music & Illegal File Sharing
DOWNLOADING MUSIC & ILLEGAL FILE SHARING Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, California State University, Chico is required to take steps to expeditiously remove or disable access to any copyrighted material being shared illegally from within its network Illegal file-sharing and other copyright violations are a violation of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations. What is illegal file sharing? Using file sharing programs such as LimeWire, BitTorrent, Ares, and eMule to share or obtain copyrighted music, movies, games, and other software without the permission of the copyright holder is illegal. Organizations such as the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), the Entertainment Software Association (ESA), and others monitor file sharing systems on the Internet. When they discover an instance of illegal file sharing that is originating from within Chico State’s network, they will send an official notice to the University. Upon receipt of this notice, the University must take action to stop copyright infringement from occurring on its network. What are the consequences? If you illegally share copyrighted files: Your ResNet network privileges will be suspended. You may have to pay at least $3,000 in a settlement with the copyright holder! Repeat offenders will face disciplinary action with Student Judicial Affairs. First-time offenders will be directed to a warning web page and will be notified via an email to his/her Wildcat Mail account. It will be your responsibility to follow the instructions on the warning page. Repeat offenders will lose their network privileges indefinitely and face further disciplinary action.
[Show full text]
Connection Manual for Student Residence Hall Network System
Connection Manual for Student Residence Hall Network System Academic Computing and Communications Center April 1, 2013 This manual describes the use of the Student Residence Hall Network System. You will receive your user name (printed on the back of your student ID card) and password during the university enrollment procedures. Please be aware that you will not be able to use the network system before that. Furthermore, even if you make inquiries beforehand, you will not receive your user name and password. You can find more details about the user name and password at the following URL: https://account.tsukuba.ac.jp/index-e.html (English) Please make sure you respect the important points below before using the Student Residence Hall Network System. □ The use of peer-to-peer file sharing software (Xunlei, Torrent, eMule, Limewire etc.) is strictly prohibited in our university. □ Do not illegally download or upload any kind of copyrighted material. □ Please enroll in the “INFOSS 情報倫理” (“INFOSS information ethics”) course offered by the e-learning system (moodle) of the University of Tsukuba. □ Do not use any wireless LAN device or broadband router in a student residence hall. Such a device may cause other users to lose their network connection (more than 45 problems were caused by such instances in the first half of the last year). □ Please install the antivirus software provided by our university (each student can install this software on one device). □ The Academic Computing and Communications Center cannot offer support on weekends or during the night time. However, a help desk offering support for connecting to the university network is open for a limited time for newly enrolled students (details can be found on the last page).
[Show full text]
Resource-Sharing Computer Communications Networks
PROCEEDISGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 60, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 1972 1397 ington. D. C.: Spartan, 1970, pp. 569-579. [47] L. G. Roberts and B. Wessler, “The ARP.4 computer network de- [34] D. Klejtman,“Methods of investigatingconnectivity of large velopmentto achieve resource sharing, in Spring Joint Compztfer graphs, IEEE Trans.Circuit Theory (Corresp.),vol. CT-16, pp. Conf., AFIPS Conf. Proc., 1970, pp. 543-519. 232-233, May 1969. [48] --, “The ARPA computer network,” in Computer Communication [35] P. Krolak, IV. Felts,and G. Marble,“A man-machine approach Networks, F. Kuo and X. .‘\bramson, Eds.Iiew York: Prentice- towardsolving the traveling salesman problem,’! Commun.Ass. Hall, 1973, to be published. Comput. Mach., vol. 14, pp. 327-335, May 1971. [49] B. Rothfarb and M. Goldstein, ‘The one terminal Telpak problem,” [36] S. Lin,“Computer solutions of thetraveling salesman problem,” Oper. Res., vol. 19, pp. 156-169, Jan.-Feb. 1971. Bell Sysf. Tech. J., vol. 44, pp. 2245-2269, 1965. [SO] R. L. Sharma and M.T. El Bardai, “Suboptimal communications [37] T. Marilland L. G. Roberts, “Toward a cooperative netwotk of network synthesis,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Communications, vol. 7, pp. time-shared computers,” in Fall Joint Computer Conf.?AFIPS Conf. 19-11-19-16, 1970. Proc. Washington, D.C.: Spartan, 1966. ..[Sl] K. Steiglitz, P. Weiner, and D.J. Kleitman, “The design of minimum [38] B. Meister,H. R. Muller, and H. R.Rudin, “Sew optimization cost survivable networks,’! IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory, vol. CT-16, criteriafor message-switching networks,’ IEEE Trans.Commun. pp. 455-260, Nov.
[Show full text]
What You Need to Know About Copyright Infringement October 2, 2018 Dear Student, the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 Re
What You Need to Know About Copyright Infringement October 2, 2018 Dear Student, The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 requires all colleges and universities to inform students of the possible consequences of copyright infringement as outlined by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). How the DMCA Affects Wake Forest University The Digital Millennium Copyright Act protects the rights of owners of copyrighted digital material. By providing students online access to the Wake Forest University’s computing network(s), including Internet access, the University is considered an Internet Service Provider (ISP). The DMCA requires an ISP to expeditiously respond to complaints it receives of copyright infringements over its networks. Potential Legal Penalties for Federal Copyright Law Violations Violation of the DMCA can result in severe civil or criminal penalties. University action taken to stop copyright violation, including disciplinary measures, does not protect the individual infringer from civil or criminal prosecution from the copyright owner or the authorities. Illegal Music Downloading Complaints Filed by Entertainment Entities Most copyright infringement cases reported to Wake Forest Information Systems are associated with illegal music downloading. Other common types of copyright infringement cases at Wake Forest involve the illegal downloading or sharing of movies, videos, and software including gaming software. Risks Associated with Illegal File Sharing Using peer-to-peer file sharing programs that share copyrighted material such as music, movies and software put you at risk of obtaining viruses, spyware or other malicious software that can corrupt your computer and damage your data. Peer-to-peer file sharing programs include Popcorn View, Popcorn Time, Vuze, uTorrent, BitTorrent, LimeWire, BitComet, and FrostWire.
[Show full text]
Detecting and Tracing Copyright Infringements in P2P Networks John Mee and Paul A
Detecting and Tracing Copyright Infringements in P2P Networks John Mee and Paul A. Watters Postgraduate Professional Development Program, Division of Information and Communication Sciences,, Macquarie University NSW 2109, AUSTRALIA <[email protected]> Abstract of the United States Code, and the Copyright Act of 1968 in Australia). Peer-to-Peer (P2P) file trading is a popular Rights are granted over reproduction of works “in medium for copyright infringement. There exists a any form”. The treaty grants any work, by its very misconception in legal and executive circles that this existence, first rights to its author, and as negotiated form of copyright infringement is undetectable and between the subsequent owners thereafter. As such any untraceable. This paper demonstrates how we can file transmitted over a peer-to-peer network has rights detect the majority of copyrighted material for existing applicable to its reproduction. However, there does not P2P networks (FastTrack and Gnutella) using a exist a technical means to determine whether a specific scalable algorithm. instance of reproduction is authorized. Consequently, it is impossible to determine whether 1. Introduction a reproduction (such as a file transfer in a P2P The goal of this study is to provide a technical network) automatically manifests a copyright rebuttal to the legal perception that P2P file sharing is infringement. The burden lies on the copyright holder not traceable or detectable. We hope this assists to identify each specific form of the work (such as a lawmakers, copyright holders and Internet service file), and to assert their exclusive authority to providers to develop technically sound strategies to reproduce it.
[Show full text]
Openbazaar Is a Decentralized Commerce System
SED 457 Transcript EPISODE 457 [INTRODUCTION] [0:00:00.3] JM: Cryptocurrencies give us a decentralized financial system. OpenBazaar is a decentralized commerce system. A merchant can log on to OpenBazaar and post a listing for an item. For example, a t-shirt that I want to sell for $15. My item listing will spread throughout the OpenBazaar, peer-to-peer network. A shopper can download the OpenBazaar desktop application and see my listing for a t-shirt. The shopper can pay me $15 in Bitcoin and I will send the t-shirt to their address. If I were selling that shirt on Amazon, the corporation would take a cut of that transaction. OpenBazaar has no transaction costs, so users get to save some money. However, users also miss out on the benefits of a corporate marketplace. Amazon makes sure that the seller will send the item to the buyer and makes sure that the buyer pays the seller. On OpenBazaar an escrow system is needed to place money in the hands of a neutral third party until the goods are delivered. Amazon ensures that the distributor sends the item to the customer. On OpenBazaar, users need to figure out how to send those goods to each other. Brian Hoffman was the first developer to start working on OpenBazaar, and the project has grown significantly since his initial commit. OpenBazaar now has buyers and sellers and open source committers, and there’s a clear desire for an open system of commerce. Brian is also the CEO of OB1, a company that provides services on top of OpenBazaar.
[Show full text]