Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2011 Franz Kafka, Lawrence Joseph, and the Possibilities of Jurisprudential Literature Patrick J. Glen Georgetown University Law Center,
[email protected] Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 11-22 This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/967 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1768093 21 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 47-94 (2011) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Courts Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Society Commons FRANZ KAFKA, LAWRENCE JOSEPH, AND THE POSSIBILITIES OF JURISPRUDENTIAL LITERATURE PATRICK J. GLEN* I. INTRODUCTION What does a tubercular Czech Jew, born and raised in Prague, who died in June 1924, have in common with a Maronite Catholic of mixed Lebanese and Syrian descent, born and raised in Detroit during the 1950s and 1960s, and who currently haunts the streets of twenty-first century New York City? If the Czech Jew is Franz Kafka and the Maronite Detroiter is Lawrence Joseph, there are far more similarities than one may expect considering the expanse of time and space separating their lives and experiences.1 Both studied and eventually practiced law: Kafka in the context of insurance, employment, and workers compensation, and Joseph with the international law firm of Shearman & Sterling.2 Kafka was a short story writer and novelist while Joseph is an acclaimed poet and novelist.3 In both of their literary works, law and legal themes are often at the center of their writings.