DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparison of Classifications in the Flora of China, the Flora

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparison of Classifications in the Flora of China, the Flora COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATIONS 37(5,'23+<7(6$1'*<01263(506 Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (FRPS) and Flora of China (FOC) Table 1: Comparison of FRPS and FOC FOassi¿FaWion of pWHridopK\WH and J\mnospHrm famiOiHs sorWHd E\ FRPS volume and page number (i.e., ¿rsW page of WKe famil\ or ¿rsW generiF WreaWmenW). FRPS families in boldface have the same delimitation in FOC. Those marked with an asterisk* have two accounts, in volume 2 and again in volume 6(1). FRPS vol.: Chinese name of FRPS family FRPS family or part family FOC family FOC vol.: page no. or part family page no. PTERIDOPHYTES 2 6 ⫊ᇨᇣ㤝⾥ Ophioglossaceae 2± 2 11 䰈ഄ㬼⾥ BotrychiaceaeOphioglossaceae 2± 2 2 ϗᣛ㬼⾥ Helminthostachyaceae 2± 2 2 㦆ᑻ㬼⾥ Angiopteridaceae 2± Marattiaceae 2 6 ໽᯳㬼⾥ Christenseniaceae 2± 2 2 ㋿㧕⾥ Osmundaceae Osmundaceae 2± 2 ⯸䎇㬼⾥ Plagiogyriaceae Plagiogyriaceae 2± 12 2 1 ⍋䞥≭⾥ Lygodiaceae Lygodiaceae 2± 11 2 114 㥢㤝㬼⾥ Schizaeaceae Schizaeaceae 2± 122 2 116 䞠ⱑ⾥ Gleicheniaceae Gleicheniaceae 2± 11 2 12 㝰㬼⾥ Hymenophyllaceae Hymenophyllaceae 2± 2 1 㱠໇㬼⾥ Dicksoniaceae Cibotiaceae 2± 12 2 1 ⹫㬼⾥ Dennstaedtiaceae Dennstaedtiaceae 2± 14 2 2 ⿔ᄤ㬼⾥ Monachosoraceae 2 26 劲ྟ㬼⾥ 劲ྟ㬼ሲㄝ Lindsaeaceae e[cl. Taenitis Lindsaeaceae 2± 1 2 2 劲ྟ㬼⾥ ネ৊㬼ሲ Lindsaeaceae Taenitis Pteridaceae 2± 211 Davalliaceae Araiostegia, Davallia (incl. Trogostolon), 2 2* 偼⹢㸹⾥ ᇣ㝰Ⲫ㬼ሲㄝ Davalliaceae 2± 4 Humata, Paradavallodes (incl. Davallodes) 2 24* 偼⹢㸹⾥ 䲼㬼ሲ Davalliaceae Gymnogrammitis Polypodiaceae 2± 6 2 26* 偼⹢㸹⾥ ໻㝰Ⲫ㬼ሲ Davalliaceae Leucostegia Hypodematiaceae 2± 2 1* 偼⹢㸹⾥ 㚒㬼ሲ Davalliaceae Nephrolepis Nephrolepidaceae 2± 2 2 1 偼⹢㸹⾥ ⠀ᷥ㬼ሲ Davalliaceae Arthropteris Tectariaceae 2± 2 1* ᴵ㬼⾥ Oleandraceae Oleandraceae 2± 4 (1) 1 㬼⾥ Pteridiaceae Dennstaedtiaceae 2± 14 (1) 1 ޸ሒ㬼⾥ ޸ሒ㬼ሲ Pteridaceae Pteris Pteridaceae 2± 11 (1) ޸ሒ㬼⾥ ᷫ㬼ሲ Pteridaceae Histiopteris Dennstaedtiaceae 2± 11 (1) 2 स㬼⾥ Acrostichaceae Pteridaceae 2± 1 (1) 4 ܝ৊㮸㬼⾥ Stenochlaenaceae Blechnaceae 2± 41 (1) Ё೑㬼⾥ Sinopteridaceae 2± 11 (1) 1 䪕㒓㬼⾥ Adiantaceae 2± 2 (1) 216 㻌ᄤ㬼⾥ Hemionitidaceae 2± 2 Pteridaceae (1) 24 ∈㬼⾥ Parkeriaceae (Ceratopteridaceae) 2± 1 (2) 1 䔺ࠡ㬼⾥ Antrophyaceae 2± 2 (2) 12 кᏺ㬼⾥ 9ittariaceae 2± 2 41 Flora_of_China.indd 41 10/18/13 12:20 PM 42 COMPA5,SON O) CLASS,),CAT,ONS FRPS vol.: Chinese name of FRPS family FRPS family or part family FOC family FOC vol.: page no. or part family page no. (2) 2 䐘Ⲫ㬼⾥ ᅝ㬼ሲㄝ Athyriaceae Anisocampium (incl. Athyriaceae 2± 41 Kuniwatsukia), Athyrium (incl. Pseudocystopteris), Cornopteris (incl. Neoathyrium), Deparia (incl. Athyriopsis, Dictyodroma, Dryoathyrium, Lunathyrium), Diplazium (incl. Allantodia, Callipteris, Monomelangium) (2) 䐘Ⲫ㬼⾥ ҂↯㬼ሲㄝ Athyriaceae Acystopteris, Cystopteridaceae 2± 2 Cystoathyrium, Cystopteris, Gymnocarpium (2) 26 䐘Ⲫ㬼⾥ 䕈ᵰ㬼ሲ Athyriaceae Rhachidosorus Rhachidosoraceae 2± 46 (2) 4 䐘Ⲫ㬼⾥ 㙴㬼ሲ Athyriaceae Diplaziopsis Diplaziopsidaceae 2± 1 4(1) 1 㚓䎇㬼⾥ Hypodematiaceae Hypodematiaceae p.p. 2± 4(1) 1 䞥᯳㬼⾥ Thelypteridaceae Thelypteridaceae 2± 1 4(2) 1 䪕㾦㬼⾥ Aspleniaceae Aspleniaceae 2± 26 4(2) 14 ⴿ↯㬼⾥ Pleurosoriopsidaceae Polypodiaceae 2± 4(2) 1 ⧗ᄤ㬼⾥ Onocleaceae Onocleaceae 2± 4 4(2) 166 ች㬼⾥ Woodsiaceae Woodsiaceae 2± 4(2) 12 Р↯㬼⾥ Blechnaceae Blechnaceae p.p. 2± 411 4(2) 216 ᶘⲪ㬼⾥ Peranemataceae (³Peranemaceae´) 2± 62 Dryopteridaceae (1) 1 劲↯㬼⾥ e[cl. ᢳ䌃ӫሲ Dryopteridaceae e[cl. Cyclopeltis 2± 41 (2) 12 劲↯㬼⾥ ᢳ䌃ӫሲ Dryopteridaceae Cyclopeltis Lomariopsidaceae 2± 2 Tectariaceae (³Aspidiaceae´) 6(1) 1 ϝঝ㬼⾥ 㙟↯㬼ሲㄝ Dryopteridaceae 2± Ctenitis, Lastreopsis Tectariaceae (³Aspidiaceae´) e[cl. 6(1) ϝঝ㬼⾥ e[cl. 㙟↯㬼ሲㄝ Tectariaceae 2± 24 Ctenitis, Lastreopsis 6(1) 14 ᅲ㬼⾥ Bolbitidaceae Dryopteridaceae 2± 14 6(1) 12 㮸㬼⾥ 㮸㬼ሲ Lomariopsidaceae Lomariopsis Lomariopsidaceae p.p. 2± 26 6(1) 12 㮸㬼⾥ 㔥㮸㬼ሲ Lomariopsidaceae Lomagramma 2± 24 Dryopteridaceae 6(1) 14 㟠㬼⾥ Elaphoglossaceae 2± 21 6(1) 14* 㚒㬼⾥ Nephrolepidaceae Nephrolepidaceae 2± 2 6(1) 14* ᴵ㬼⾥ Oleandraceae Oleandraceae 2± 4 6(1) 161* 偼⹢㸹⾥ e[cl. ໻㝰Ⲫ㬼ሲ Davalliaceae e[cl. Leucostegia Davalliaceae 2± 6(1) 1* 偼⹢㸹⾥ ໻㝰Ⲫ㬼ሲ Davalliaceae Leucostegia Hypodematiaceae 2± 4 6(1) 1* 䲼㬼⾥ Gymnogrammitidaceae Polypodiaceae 2± 6(2) 1 ঠ᠛㬼⾥ Dipteridaceae 2± 116 Dipteridaceae 6(2) ➩ሒ㬼⾥ Cheiropleuriaceae 2± 11 6(2) ∈啭偼⾥ Polypodiaceae 2± 6(2) 26 ῆ㬼⾥ Drynariaceae 2± 6 6(2) 2 呓㾦㬼⾥ PlatyceriaceaePolypodiaceae 2± 6 6(2) 2 ⾒৊㬼⾥ Grammitidaceae 2± 6(2) 2 ࠥ㬼⾥ Loxogrammaceae 2± 61 6(2) 6 㯟⾥ Marsileaceae Marsileaceae 2± 12 Flora_of_China.indd 42 10/18/13 12:20 PM COMPAR,SON O) CLASS,),CAT,ONS 4 FRPS vol.: Chinese name of FRPS family FRPS family or part family FOC family FOC vol.: page no. or part family page no. 6(2) 4 ᾤ৊㣍⾥ Salviniaceae 2± 12 Salviniaceae 6(2) 42 ⒵∳㑶⾥ Azollaceae 2± 126 6() 1 ⷇ᴝ⾥ Huperziaceae 2± 1 Lycopodiaceae 6() ⷇ᵒ⾥ Lycopodiaceae 2± 2 6() 6 ोᶣ⾥ Selaginellaceae Selaginellaceae 2± 6() 22 ∈䷁⾥ Isoëtaceae Isoëtaceae 2± 6() 224 ᳼䌐⾥ Equisetaceae Equisetaceae 2± 6 6() 244 ᵒ৊㬼⾥ Psilotaceae Psilotaceae 2± 1 6() 246 ড়ಞ㬼⾥ Marattiaceae Marattiaceae p.p. 2± 2 6() 24 ḿỸ⾥ Cyatheaceae Cyatheaceae 2± 14 GYMNOSPERMS 4 㢣䪕⾥ Cycadaceae Cycadaceae 4 1 1 䫊ᴣ⾥ Ginkgoaceae Ginkgoaceae 4 24 फ⋟ᴝ⾥ Araucariaceae Araucariaceae 4 2 ᵒ⾥ Pinaceae Pinaceae 4 11 21 ᴝ⾥ excl. 䞥ᵒሲ Taxodiaceae excl. Sciadopitys Taxodiaceae 4 4 2 ᴝ⾥ 䞥ᵒሲ Taxodiaceae Sciadopitys Sciadopityaceae 4 1 ᶣ⾥ Cupressaceae Cupressaceae 4 62 㔫∝ᵒ⾥ Podocarpaceae Podocarpaceae 4 42 ϝᇪᴝ⾥ Cephalotaxaceae Cephalotaxaceae 4 4 㑶䈚ᴝ⾥ Taxaceae Taxaceae 4 46 咏咘⾥ Ephedraceae Ephedraceae 4 4 ф咏㮸⾥ Gnetaceae Gnetaceae 4 12 Flora_of_China.indd 43 10/18/13 12:20 PM 44 COMPARISON O) CLASSI)ICATIONS Table 2: Comparison of FRPS and FOC classi¿cation of pteridophyte and gymnosperm families sorted alphabetically by FRPS family. FRPS family Chinese name of FRPS vol.: FOC FOC vol.: or part family FRPS family or page no. family page no. part family PTERIDOPHYTES Acrostichaceae स㬼⾥ (1) 2 Pteridaceae 2± 1 Adiantaceae 䪕㒓㬼⾥ (1) 1 Pteridaceae 2± 2 Angiopteridaceae 㦆ᑻ㬼⾥ 2 2 Marattiaceae 2± Antrophyaceae 䔺ࠡ㬼⾥ (2) 1 Pteridaceae 2± 2 Aspleniaceae 䪕㾦㬼⾥ 4(2) 1 Aspleniaceae 2± 26 Athyriaceae Acystopteris, Cystoathyrium, 䐘Ⲫ㬼⾥ ҂↯㬼 (2) Cystopteridaceae 2± 2 Cystopteris, Gymnocarpium ሲㄝ Athyriaceae Anisocampium (incl. Kuniwatsukia), Athyrium (incl. Pseudocystopteris), Cornopteris (incl. Neoathyrium), 䐘Ⲫ㬼⾥ ᅝ㬼 (2) 2 Athyriaceae 2± 41 Deparia (incl. Athyriopsis, Dictyodroma, ሲㄝ Dryoathyrium, Lunathyrium), Diplazium (incl. Allantodia, Callipteris, Monomelangium) Athyriaceae Diplaziopsis 䐘Ⲫ㬼⾥ 㙴㬼ሲ (2) 4 Diplaziopsidaceae 2± 1 䐘Ⲫ㬼⾥ 䕈ᵰ Athyriaceae Rhachidosorus (2) 26 Rhachidosoraceae 2± 46 㬼ሲ Azollaceae ⒵∳㑶⾥ 6(2) 42 Salviniaceae 2± 126 Blechnaceae Р↯㬼⾥ 4(2) 12 Blechnaceae 2± 411 Bolbitidaceae ᅲ㬼⾥ 6(1) 14 Dryopteridaceae 2± 14 Botrychiaceae 䰈ഄ㬼⾥ 2 11 Ophioglossaceae 2± Cheiropleuriaceae ➩ሒ㬼⾥ 6(2) Dipteridaceae 2± 11 Christenseniaceae ໽᯳㬼⾥ 2 6 Marattiaceae 2± 2 Cyatheaceae ḿỸ⾥ 6() 24 Cyatheaceae 2± 14 Davalliaceae Araiostegia, Davallia (incl. 偼⹢㸹⾥ ᇣ㝰Ⲫ Trogostolon), Humata, Paradavallodes (incl. 2 2 2± 4 㬼ሲㄝ Davallodes) Davalliaceae 偼⹢㸹⾥ excl. ໻ Davalliaceae excl. Leucostegia 6(1) 161 2± 㝰Ⲫ㬼ሲ 偼⹢㸹⾥ ⠀ᷥ Davalliaceae Arthropteris 2 1 Tectariaceae 2± 㬼ሲ Davalliaceae Gymnogrammitis 偼⹢㸹⾥ 䲼㬼ሲ 2 24 Polypodiaceae 2± 6 偼⹢㸹⾥ ໻㝰Ⲫ 2 26 Davalliaceae Leucostegia Hypodematiaceae 2± 㬼ሲ 6(1) 1 Davalliaceae Nephrolepis 偼⹢㸹⾥ 㚒㬼ሲ 2 1 Nephrolepidaceae 2± 2 Dennstaedtiaceae ⹫㬼⾥ 2 1 Dennstaedtiaceae 2± 14 Dicksoniaceae 㱠໇㬼⾥ 2 1 Cibotiaceae 2± 12 Dipteridaceae ঠ᠛㬼⾥ 6(2) 1 Dipteridaceae 2± 116 Drynariaceae ῆ㬼⾥ 6(2) 26 Polypodiaceae 2± 6 劲↯㬼⾥ excl. ᢳ Dryopteridaceae excl. Cyclopeltis (1) 1 Dryopteridaceae 2± 41 䌃ӫሲ 劲↯㬼⾥ ᢳ䌃 Dryopteridaceae Cyclopeltis (2) 12 Lomariopsidaceae 2± 2 ӫሲ Flora_of_China.indd 44 10/18/13 12:20 PM COMPARISON O) CLASSI)ICATIONS 4 FRPS family Chinese name of FRPS vol.: FOC FOC vol.: or part family FRPS family or page no. family page no. part family Elaphoglossaceae 㟠㬼⾥ 6(1) 14 Dryopteridaceae 2± 21 Equisetaceae ᳼䌐⾥ 6() 224 Equisetaceae 2± 6 Gleicheniaceae 䞠ⱑ⾥ 2 116 Gleicheniaceae 2± 11 Grammitidaceae ⾒৊㬼⾥ 6(2) 2 Polypodiaceae 2± Gymnogrammitidaceae 䲼㬼⾥ 6(1) 1 Polypodiaceae 2± Helminthostachyaceae ϗᣛ㬼⾥ 2 2 Ophioglossaceae 2± Hemionitidaceae 㻌ᄤ㬼⾥ (1) 216 Pteridaceae 2± 2 Huperziaceae ⷇ᴝ⾥ 6() 1 Lycopodiaceae 2± 1 Hymenophyllaceae 㝰㬼⾥ 2 12 Hymenophyllaceae 2± Hypodematiaceae 㚓䎇㬼⾥ 4(1) 1 Hypodematiaceae 2± Isoëtaceae ∈䷁⾥ 6() 22 Isoëtaceae 2± Lindsaeaceae Lindsaea (incl. Schizoloma), 劲ྟ㬼⾥ 劲ྟ㬼 2 26 Lindsaeaceae 2± 1 Odontosoria (incl. Stenoloma), Tapeinidium ሲㄝ 劲ྟ㬼⾥ ネ৊ Lindsaeaceae Taenitis 2 2 Pteridaceae 2± 211 㬼ሲ Lomariopsidaceae Lomagramma 㮸㬼⾥ 㔥㮸㬼ሲ 6(1) 12 Dryopteridaceae 2± 24 Lomariopsidaceae Lomariopsis 㮸㬼⾥ 㮸㬼ሲ 6(1) 12 Lomariopsidaceae 2± 26 Loxogrammaceae ࠥ㬼⾥ 6(2) 2 Polypodiaceae 2± 61 Lycopodiaceae ⷇ᵒ⾥ 6() Lycopodiaceae 2± 2 Lygodiaceae ⍋䞥≭⾥ 2 1 Lygodiaceae 2± 11 Marattiaceae ড়ಞ㬼⾥ 6() 246 Marattiaceae 2± 2 Marsileaceae 㯟⾥ 6(2) 6 Marsileaceae 2± 12 Monachosoraceae ⿔ᄤ㬼⾥ 2 2 Dennstaedtiaceae 2± 14 Nephrolepidaceae 㚒㬼⾥ 6(1) 14 Nephrolepidaceae 2± 2 Oleandraceae ᴵ㬼⾥ 2 1 Oleandraceae 2± 4 Oleandraceae ᴵ㬼⾥ 6(1) 14 Oleandraceae 2± 4 Onocleaceae ⧗ᄤ㬼⾥ 4(2) 1 Onocleaceae 2± 4 Ophioglossaceae ⫊ᇨᇣ㤝⾥ 2 6 Ophioglossaceae 2± Osmundaceae ㋿㧕⾥ 2 Osmundaceae 2± Parkeriaceae (Ceratopteridaceae) ∈㬼⾥ (1) 24 Pteridaceae 2± 1 Peranemataceae (³Peranemaceae´) ᶘⲪ㬼⾥ 4(2) 216 Dryopteridaceae 2± 62 Plagiogyriaceae ⯸䎇㬼⾥ 2 Plagiogyriaceae 2± 12 Platyceriaceae 呓㾦㬼⾥ 6(2) 2 Polypodiaceae 2± 6 Pleurosoriopsidaceae ⴿ↯㬼⾥ 4(2) 14 Polypodiaceae 2± Polypodiaceae ∈啭偼⾥ 6(2) Polypodiaceae 2± Psilotaceae ᵒ৊㬼⾥ 6() 244 Psilotaceae 2± 1 Pteridaceae Histiopteris ޸ሒ㬼⾥ ᷫ㬼ሲ (1) Dennstaedtiaceae 2± 11 ޸ሒ㬼⾥ ޸ሒ Pteridaceae Pteris (1) 1 Pteridaceae 2± 11 㬼ሲ Pteridiaceae 㬼⾥ (1) 1 Dennstaedtiaceae 2± 14 Salviniaceae ᾤ৊㣍⾥ 6(2) 4 Salviniaceae 2± 12 Flora_of_China.indd 45 10/18/13 12:20 PM 46 COMPARISON O) CLASSI)ICATIONS FRPS family Chinese name of FRPS vol.: FOC FOC vol.: or part family FRPS family or page no. family page no. part family Schizaeaceae 㥢㤝㬼⾥ 2 114 Schizaeaceae 2± 122 Selaginellaceae ोᶣ⾥ 6() 6 Selaginellaceae 2± Sinopteridaceae Ё೑㬼⾥ (1) Pteridaceae 2± 11 Stenochlaenaceae ܝ৊㮸㬼⾥ (1) 4 Blechnaceae 2± 41 ϝঝ㬼⾥ 㙟↯㬼 Tectariaceae (³Aspidiaceae´) Ctenitis, Lastreopsis 6(1) 1 Dryopteridaceae 2± ሲㄝ Tectariaceae (³Aspidiaceae´) excl.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant List 2016
    Established 1990 PLANT LIST 2016 European mail order website www.crug-farm.co.uk CRÛG FARM PLANTS • 2016 Welcome to our 2016 list hope we can tempt you with plenty of our old favourites as well as some exciting new plants that we have searched out on our travels. There has been little chance of us standing still with what has been going on here in 2015. The year started well with the birth of our sixth grandchild. January into February had Sue and I in Colombia for our first winter/early spring expedition. It was exhilarating, we were able to travel much further afield than we had previously, as the mountainous areas become safer to travel. We are looking forward to working ever closer with the Colombian institutes, such as the Medellin Botanic Gardens whom we met up with. Consequently we were absent from the RHS February Show at Vincent Square. We are finding it increasingly expensive participating in the London shows, while re-branding the RHS February Show as a potato event hardly encourages our type of customer base to visit. A long standing speaking engagement and a last minute change of date, meant that we missed going to Fota near Cork last spring, no such problem this coming year. We were pleasantly surprised at the level of interest at the Trgrehan Garden Rare Plant Fair, in Cornwall. Hopefully this will become an annual event for us, as well as the Cornwall Garden Society show in April. Poor Sue went through the wars having to have a rush hysterectomy in June, after some timely results revealed future risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Stillingia: a Newly Recorded Genus of Euphorbiaceae from China
    Phytotaxa 296 (2): 187–194 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.296.2.8 Stillingia: A newly recorded genus of Euphorbiaceae from China SHENGCHUN LI1, 2, BINGHUI CHEN1, XIANGXU HUANG1, XIAOYU CHANG1, TIEYAO TU*1 & DIANXIANG ZHANG1 1 Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China * Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract Stillingia (Euphorbiaceae) contains ca. 30 species from Latin America, the southern United States, and various islands in the tropical Pacific and in the Indian Ocean. We report here for the first time the occurrence of a member of the genus in China, Stillingia lineata subsp. pacifica. The distribution of the genus in China is apparently narrow, known only from Pingzhou and Wanzhou Islands of the Wanshan Archipelago in the South China Sea, which is close to the Pearl River estuary. This study updates our knowledge on the geographic distribution of the genus, and provides new palynological data as well. Key words: Island, Hippomaneae, South China Sea, Stillingia lineata Introduction During the last decade, hundreds of new plant species or new species records have been added to the flora of China. Nevertheless, newly described or newly recorded plant genera are not discovered and reported very often, suggesting that botanical expedition and plant survey at the generic level may be advanced in China. As far as we know, only six and eight angiosperm genera respectively have been newly described or newly recorded from China within the last ten years (Qiang et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Wild Angiosperms of Bhagwan Mahavir (Molem
    Check List 9(2): 186–207, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Check List of Wild Angiosperms of Bhagwan Mahavir PECIES S OF Mandar Nilkanth Datar 1* and P. Lakshminarasimhan 2 ISTS L (Molem) National Park, Goa, India *1 CorrespondingAgharkar Research author Institute, E-mail: G. [email protected] G. Agarkar Road, Pune - 411 004. Maharashtra, India. 2 Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P. O. Botanic Garden, Howrah - 711 103. West Bengal, India. Abstract: Bhagwan Mahavir (Molem) National Park, the only National park in Goa, was evaluated for it’s diversity of Angiosperms. A total number of 721 wild species belonging to 119 families were documented from this protected area of which 126 are endemics. A checklist of these species is provided here. Introduction in the National Park are Laterite and Deccan trap Basalt Protected areas are most important in many ways for (Naik, 1995). Soil in most places of the National Park area conservation of biodiversity. Worldwide there are 102,102 is laterite of high and low level type formed by natural Protected Areas covering 18.8 million km2 metamorphosis and degradation of undulation rocks. network of 660 Protected Areas including 99 National Minerals like bauxite, iron and manganese are obtained Parks, 514 Wildlife Sanctuaries, 43 Conservation. India Reserves has a from these soils. The general climate of the area is tropical and 4 Community Reserves covering a total of 158,373 km2 with high percentage of humidity throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoshirakia Japonica in Plaats Van Sapium Japonicum
    SORTIMENT PIET DE JONG Neoshirakia japonica in plaats van Sapium japonicum Hoe een aantrekkelijke maar nog altijd vrij onbekende heester al ruim een halve eeuw geleden in een ander geslacht werd geplaatst. Een voorbeeld van de traag- heid waarmee nieuwe taxonomische inzichten kunnen doordringen in het handels- en liefhebberscircuit. In de komende herdruk van de Naamlijst van dicht bij de bron, liet men het toch, vreemd Houtige Gewassen en zeer waarschijnlijk ook genoeg, maar bij het oude vertrouwde Sapium in de daaropvolgende – als die nog ooit zal japonicum. Flora of Japan vermeldt Shirakia verschijnen – zal de naam Sapium japonicum japonica als één van de vele synoniemen. nog vermeld worden. De soort is echter al in Misschien is het achteraf maar goed dat de 1954 door de Japanner Hurusawa in een apart naam Shirakia japonica obscuur bleef, want geslacht Shirakia geplaatst. In Japan, zo de geslachtsnaam bleek uiteindelijk ook nog eens ongeldig te zijn. Shirakia bleek eerder gegeven te zijn aan een fossiel varengeslacht uit Zuid-Korea en is dus volgens de Interna- tional Code of Botanical Nomenclature een homoniem. Toen dit in 1996 aan het licht kwam, moest er een nieuwe geslachtsnaam komen en dat werd Neoshirakia. Deze werd in 1998 door Esser gepubliceerd in het in Leiden door Naturalis uitgegeven weten- schappelijke tijdschrift Blumea. Waar Flora of Japan het nog bij Sapium japonicum houdt, vermeldt Flora of China sinds 2008 al wel de nieuwe naam Neoshirakia japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) Esser. Bloeiwijze van Neoshirakia japonica (voorheen Sapium japonicum) Foto: Piet de Jong 16 Arbor Vitae | 3-25 | 2015 Botanische tuinen, waaronder ook het mij ver- Al deze wetenschappelijke perikelen nemen trouwde Von Gimborn Arboretum, verwerken niet weg dat N.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoshirakia, (Euphorbiaceae) 1 Japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) Esser
    BLUMEA 43 (1998) 129-130 Neoshirakia, a new name for Shirakia Hurus. (Euphorbiaceae) Hans-Joachim Esser Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, P. O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 1 Shirakia (Euphorbiaceae) was described by Hurusawa (1954) with three species. It was namedafter Croton shiraki, a nomen nudum used by Siebold& Zuccarini (1843) for the species currently known as S. japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) Hurus. Kruijt (1996) transferred five additional species to Shirakia. Esser et al. (1998) showed that S. ja- ponica, the type, differs in several characters from the remainder of the genus. In a phylogenetic analysis they concluded that all additional species have to be removed to other genera (Shirakiopsis Esser ined., TriadicaLour.), with Shirakia remaining as endemic and Asia. a monotypic genus to Japan adjacent East The name, however, is a later homonym of Shirakia S. Kawasaki, a fern fossil described in 1934 from South Korea. This informationis included in the WWW ver- sion of the Index Nominum Genericorum (Farr & Zijlstra, 1996 and onward). Be- cause this earlier homonym was published in a publication of very restricted distribu- tion, it was overlooked by recent workers (Kruijt, 1996;Esser et al., 1998). GeaZijlstra and John Wiersema kindly confirmed that a new name is still necessary for Shirakia Hurus., and this is provided herewith. NEOSHIRAKIA Esser, nom. now Excoecaria L. sect. Parasapium Mull. Arg., Linnaea 32 (1863) 123. — Shirakia Hurus., J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot. 6 (1954) 317 [non Shirakia S. Kawasaki, Bull. Geol. Surv. Chosen 6(4) (1934) 98]. — Type: Neoshirakia japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) Esser, based on Stillingia japonica Siebold & Zucc.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Above-Ground Biomass, and Vegetation Patterns in a Tropical Dry Forest in Kimbi-Fungom National Park, Cameroon
    Heliyon 6 (2020) e03290 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Heliyon journal homepage: www.cell.com/heliyon Research article Diversity, above-ground biomass, and vegetation patterns in a tropical dry forest in Kimbi-Fungom National Park, Cameroon Moses N. Sainge a,*, Felix Nchu b, A. Townsend Peterson c a Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa b Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville 7535, South Africa c Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Research highlights: This study is one of few detailed analyses of plant diversity and vegetation patterns in African Ecological restoration dry forests. We established permanent plots to characterize plant diversity, above-ground biomass, and vegetation Flora patterns in a tropical dry forest in Kimbi-Fungom National Park, Cameroon. Our results contribute to long-term Environmental assessment monitoring, predictions, and management of dry forest ecosystems, which are often vulnerable to anthropogenic Environmental health pressures. Environmental impact assessment Dry forest Background and objectives: Considerable consensus exists regarding the importance of dry forests in species di- Bamenda highlands versity and carbon storage; however, the relationship between dry forest tree species composition, species rich- Kimbi-Fungom National Park ness, and carbon stock is not well established. Also, simple baseline data on plant diversity are scarce for many dry Carbon forest ecosystems. This study seeks to characterize floristic diversity, vegetation patterns, and tree diversity in Semi-deciduous permanent plots in a tropical dry forest in Northwestern Cameroon (Kimbi-Fungom National Park) for the first Tree composition time.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials Anti-Infectious Plants of The
    Supplementary Materials Anti‐infectious plants of the Thai Karen: A meta‐analysis Methee Phumthum and Henrik Balslev List of data sources 1. Anderson EF. Plants and people of the Golden Triangle ethnobotany of the hill tribes of northern Thailand. Southwest Portland: Timber Press, Inc.,; 1993. 2. Junkhonkaen J. Ethnobotany of Ban Bowee, Amphoe Suan Phueng, Changwat Ratchaburi. Master thesis. Bangkok: Kasetsart University Library; 2012. 3. Junsongduang A. Roles and importance of sacred Forest in biodiversity conservation in Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province. PhD thesis. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University. 2014. 4. Kaewsangsai S. Ethnobotany of Karen in Khun Tuen Noi Village, Mae Tuen Sub‐district, Omkoi District, Chiang Mai Province. Master thesis. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2017. 5. Kamwong K. Ethnobotany of Karens at Ban Mai Sawan and Ban Huay Pu Ling, Ban Luang Sub‐District, Chom Thong District, Chiang Mai Province. Master thesis. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2010. 6. Kantasrila, R. Ethnobotany fo Karen at Ban Wa Do Kro, Mae Song Sub‐district, Tha Song Yang District, Tak Province. Master thesis. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University Library. 2016. 7. Klibai, A. Self‐care with indigenous medicine of long‐eared Karen ethnic group: Case study Ban Mae Sin, Ban Kang Pinjai, Ban Slok, Wang Chin district, Phrae province. Master thesis. Surin: Surin Rajabhat University. 2013. 8. Mahawongsanan, A., Change of herbal plants utilization of the Pgn Kʹnyau : A case study of Ban Huay Som Poy, Mae Tia Watershed, Chom Thong District, Chiang Mai Province. Master thesis. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University Library. 2008. 9. Prachuabaree L. Medicinal plants of Karang hill tribe in Baan Pong‐lueg, Kaeng Krachan District, Phetchaburi Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/09/2021 12:24:23AM Via Free Access 2 IAWA Journal, Vol
    IAWA Journal, Vol. 26 (1), 2005: 1-68 WOOD ANATOMY OF THE SUBFAMILY EUPHORBIOIDEAE A comparison with subfamilies Crotonoideae and Acalyphoideae and the implications for the circumscription of the Euphorbiaceae Alberta M. W. Mennega Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Utrecht University branch, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 es Utrecht, The Netherlands SUMMARY The wood anatomy was studied of 82 species from 34 out of 54 genera in the subfamily Euphorbioideae, covering all five tribes recognized in this subfamily. In general the woods show a great deal of similarity. They are charac­ terized by a relative paucity of vessels, often arranged in short to long, dumbbell-shaped or twin, radial multiples, and by medium-sized to large intervessel pits; fibres often have gelatinous walls; parenchyma apotracheal in short, wavy, narrow bands and diffuse-in-aggregates; mostly uni- or only locally biseriate rays, strongly heterocellular (except Hippomane, Hura and Pachystroma). Cell contents, either silica or crystals, or both together, are nearly always present and often useful in distinguishing between genera. Radiallaticifers were noticed in most genera, though they are scarce and difficult to trace. The laticifers are generally not surrounded by special cells, except in some genera of the subtribe Euphorbiinae where radiallaticifers are comparatively frequent and conspicuous. Three ofthe five tribes show a great deal of conformity in their anatomy. Stomatocalyceae, however, stand apart from the rest by the combination of the scarcity of vessels, and mostly biseriate, vertically fused and very tall rays. Within Euphorbieae the subtribe Euphorbiinae shows a greater vari­ ation than average, notably in vessel pitting, the frequent presence of two­ celled parenchyma strands, and in size and frequency of the laticifers.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Bahare Salehi 1,2 ID , Nanjangud V. Anil Kumar 3 ID , Bilge ¸Sener 4, Mehdi Sharifi-Rad 5,*, Mehtap Kılıç 4, Gail B. Mahady 6, Sanja Vlaisavljevic 7, Marcello Iriti 8,* ID , Farzad Kobarfard 9,10, William N. Setzer 11,*, Seyed Abdulmajid Ayatollahi 9,12,13, Athar Ata 13 and Javad Sharifi-Rad 9,13,* ID 1 Medical Ethics and Law Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 88777539 Tehran, Iran; [email protected] 2 Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 22439789 Tehran, Iran 3 Department of Chemistry, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal University, Manipal 576104, India; [email protected] 4 Department of Pharmacognosy, Gazi University, Faculty of Pharmacy, 06330 Ankara, Turkey; [email protected] (B.¸S.);[email protected] (M.K.) 5 Department of Medical Parasitology, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, 61663-335 Zabol, Iran 6 PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Traditional Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, 833 S. Wood St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA; [email protected] 7 Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; [email protected] 8 Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Milan State University, 20133 Milan, Italy 9 Phytochemistry Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats 0-Year
    Table S1: The total number of recorded species per habitat (in brackets) and the number of shared species across habitats. 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- Restored Habitats Reference old old old combined 0-year-old (36 spp.) - 25 spp. 24 spp. - 25 spp. 3-year-old (40 spp.) 25 spp. - 28 spp. - 30 spp. 5-year-old (44 spp.) 24 spp. 28 spp. - - 40 spp. Restored combined (59 - - - - 49 spp. spp.) Reference (70 spp.) 25 spp. 30 spp. 40 spp. 49 spp. - Table S2: Checklist of plant species found in the restored and reference habitats. Species Family Upland area Lowland area 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- old old old Reference old old old Reference habitat habitat habitat habiat habitat habitat habitat habitat Harpephyllum caffrum Bernh. Anacardiaceae X X X X X X X - Protorhus longifolia (Bernh.) Engl. Anacardiaceae - X X X - - - X Sclerocrya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro Anacardiaceae - - - - - - - - Searsia chirindensis (Baker f.) Moffett Anacardiaceae - - X X - X X X Searsia dentata (Thunb.) F.A.Barkley Anacardiaceae - - - - - - - - Searsia lucida (L.) F.A.Barkley Anacardiaceae X - - - - X - - Searsia pentheri (Zahlbr.) Moffett Anacardiaceae - - X - - - - X Searsia rehmanniana (Engl.) Moffet Anacardiaceae X - - X - X X - Annona senegalensi Pers. Annonaceae - - - - - - - - Rauvolfia caffra Sond. Apocynaceae X X - X - - - X Tabernaemontana ventricosa Hochst. ex A.DC. Apocynaceae X X - X - - - X Cussonia spicata Thunb. Araliaceae - - - - - - - - Cussonia zuluensis Strey Araliaceae - - - X - - X - Phoenix reclinata Jacq. Arecaceae X X - - - - X X Aloe ferox Mill. Asphodelaceae - - X - - - X - Brachylaena discolor DC. Asteraceae X X X - - X - - Kigelia africana (Lam.) Benth.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabbage Production in West Africa and IPM with a Focus on Plant-Based Extracts and a Complementary Worldwide Vision
    plants Review Cabbage Production in West Africa and IPM with a Focus on Plant-Based Extracts and a Complementary Worldwide Vision Abla Déla Mondédji 1,2,*, Pierre Silvie 2,3,4 , Wolali Seth Nyamador 1, Pierre Martin 2,4 , Lakpo Koku Agboyi 5, Komina Amévoin 1, Guillaume Koffivi Ketoh 1 and Isabelle Adolé Glitho 1 1 Laboratoire d’Ecologie et d’Ecotoxicologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Lomé, Lomé 1 01B.P. 1515, Togo; [email protected] (W.S.N.); [email protected] (K.A.); [email protected] (G.K.K.); [email protected] (I.A.G.) 2 CIRAD, Agroécologie et Intensification Durable Des Cultures Annuelles (AIDA), 34398 Montpellier, France; [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (P.M.) 3 Institut de Recherche Pour le Développement, UMR IPME, 34AA001 Montpellier, France 4 AIDA, CIRAD, Montpellier University, CEDEX 05, 34398 Montpellier, France 5 CABI West Africa, PO Box CT 8630, Cantonments, Accra GA 0376800, Ghana; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +228-90109317 Abstract: In urban and peri-urban areas in West Africa, the cabbage Brassica oleracea L. (Brassicaceae) is protected using repeated high doses of synthetic insecticides. After a brief description of available IPM components, this paper presents a literature review focused on the botanical extracts that have been experimented with at the laboratory or in the field in West Africa against major cabbage pests. The literature reviewed mentions 19 plant species from 12 families used for cabbage protection in the subregion. The species most used are Azadirachta indica, Capsicum frutescens, Ocimum gratissimum Citation: Mondédji, A.D.; Silvie, P.; and Ricinus communis.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers
    Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA.
    [Show full text]