Shepherd Moon Face-Off! 21 December 2012, by Jason Major

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Shepherd Moon face-off! 21 December 2012, by Jason Major Here's Pandora, as seen by Cassini on September 5, 2005: False-color image of Pandora. Credit: NASA/JPL/SSI Raw Cassini image acquired on Dec. 18, 2012. Credit: NASA/JPL/SSI …and here's Prometheus, seen during a close pass in 2010 and color-calibrated by Gordan Ugarkovic: Two of Saturn's shepherd moons face off across the icy strand of the F ring in this image, acquired by the Cassini spacecraft on December 18, 2012. In the left corner is Pandora, external shepherd of the ropy ring, and in the right is Prometheus, whose gravity is responsible for the subtle tug on the wispy ring material. (Please don't blame the moon for any recent unsatisfying sci-fi films of the same name. There's no relation, we promise.) Similar in size (Pandora is 110 x 88 x 62 km, Prometheus 148 x 100 x 68 km) both moons are porous, icy, potato-shaped bodies covered in craters—although Prometheus' surface is somewhat smoother in appearance than Pandora's, perhaps due to the gradual buildup of infalling material from the F ring. Check out some much closer images of these two moons below, acquired during earlier flybys: 1 / 2 Prometheus casting a shadow through F ring haze. Credit: NASA/JPL/SSI/Gordan Ugarvovic The external edge of the A ring with the thin Keeler gap and the wider Encke gap can be seen at the right of the top image. Both of these gaps also harbor their own shepherd moons—Daphnis and Pan, respectively. These moons keep their gaps clear, as well as maintain the crisp edge shapes of the nearby rings—hence the term "shepherd." Source: Universe Today APA citation: Shepherd Moon face-off! (2012, December 21) retrieved 28 September 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2012-12-shepherd-moon-face-off.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. 2 / 2 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Arxiv:1912.09192V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 24 Feb 2020
Draft version February 25, 2020 Typeset using LATEX preprint style in AASTeX62 Photometric analyses of Saturn's small moons: Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are dark; Helene and Calypso are bright. M. M. Hedman,1 P. Helfenstein,2 R. O. Chancia,1, 3 P. Thomas,2 E. Roussos,4 C. Paranicas,5 and A. J. Verbiscer6 1Department of Physics, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 2Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853 3Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester NY 14623 4Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen,Germany 37077 5APL, John Hopkins University, Laurel MD 20723 6Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 ABSTRACT We examine the surface brightnesses of Saturn's smaller satellites using a photometric model that explicitly accounts for their elongated shapes and thus facilitates compar- isons among different moons. Analyses of Cassini imaging data with this model reveals that the moons Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are darker than one would expect given trends previously observed among the nearby mid-sized satellites. On the other hand, the trojan moons Calypso and Helene have substantially brighter surfaces than their co-orbital companions Tethys and Dione. These observations are inconsistent with the moons' surface brightnesses being entirely controlled by the local flux of E-ring par- ticles, and therefore strongly imply that other phenomena are affecting their surface properties. The darkness of Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene is correlated with the fluxes of high-energy protons, implying that high-energy radiation is responsible for darkening these small moons. Meanwhile, Prometheus and Pandora appear to be brightened by their interactions with nearby dusty F ring, implying that enhanced dust fluxes are most likely responsible for Calypso's and Helene's excess brightness.
[Show full text]
Cassini Update
Cassini Update Dr. Linda Spilker Cassini Project Scientist Outer Planets Assessment Group 22 February 2017 Sols%ce Mission Inclina%on Proﬁle equator Saturn wrt Inclination 22 February 2017 LJS-3 Year 3 Key Flybys Since Aug. 2016 OPAG T124 – Titan flyby (1584 km) • November 13, 2016 • LAST Radio Science flyby • One of only two (cf. T106) ideal bistatic observations capturing Titan’s Northern Seas • First and only bistatic observation of Punga Mare • Western Kraken Mare not explored by RSS before T125 – Titan flyby (3158 km) • November 29, 2016 • LAST Optical Remote Sensing targeted flyby • VIMS high-resolution map of the North Pole looking for variations at and around the seas and lakes. • CIRS last opportunity for vertical profile determination of gases (e.g. water, aerosols) • UVIS limb viewing opportunity at the highest spatial resolution available outside of occultations 22 February 2017 4 Interior of Hexagon Turning “Less Blue” • Bluish to golden haze results from increased production of photochemical hazes as north pole approaches summer solstice. • Hexagon acts as a barrier that prevents haze particles outside hexagon from migrating inward. • 5 Refracting Atmosphere Saturn's• 22unlit February rings appear 2017 to bend as they pass behind the planet’s darkened limb due• 6 to refraction by Saturn's upper atmosphere. (Resolution 5 km/pixel) Dione Harbors A Subsurface Ocean Researchers at the Royal Observatory of Belgium reanalyzed Cassini RSS gravity data• 7 of Dione and predict a crust 100 km thick with a global ocean 10’s of km deep. Titan’s Summer Clouds Pose a Mystery Why would clouds on Titan be visible in VIMS images, but not in ISS images? ISS ISS VIMS High, thin cirrus clouds that are optically thicker than Titan’s atmospheric haze at longer VIMS wavelengths,• 22 February but optically 2017 thinner than the haze at shorter ISS wavelengths, could be• 8 detected by VIMS while simultaneously lost in the haze to ISS.
[Show full text]
The Orbits of Saturn's Small Satellites Derived From
The Astronomical Journal, 132:692–710, 2006 August A # 2006. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. THE ORBITS OF SATURN’S SMALL SATELLITES DERIVED FROM COMBINED HISTORIC AND CASSINI IMAGING OBSERVATIONS J. N. Spitale CICLOPS, Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder, CO 80301; [email protected] R. A. Jacobson Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 C. C. Porco CICLOPS, Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder, CO 80301 and W. M. Owen, Jr. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 Received 2006 February 28; accepted 2006 April 12 ABSTRACT We report on the orbits of the small, inner Saturnian satellites, either recovered or newly discovered in recent Cassini imaging observations. The orbits presented here reflect improvements over our previously published values in that the time base of Cassini observations has been extended, and numerical orbital integrations have been performed in those cases in which simple precessing elliptical, inclined orbit solutions were found to be inadequate. Using combined Cassini and Voyager observations, we obtain an eccentricity for Pan 7 times smaller than previously reported because of the predominance of higher quality Cassini data in the fit. The orbit of the small satellite (S/2005 S1 [Daphnis]) discovered by Cassini in the Keeler gap in the outer A ring appears to be circular and coplanar; no external perturbations are appar- ent. Refined orbits of Atlas, Prometheus, Pandora, Janus, and Epimetheus are based on Cassini , Voyager, Hubble Space Telescope, and Earth-based data and a numerical integration perturbed by all the massive satellites and each other.
[Show full text]
Lesson 3: Moons, Rings Relationships
GETTING TO KNOW SATURN LESSON Moons, Rings, and Relationships 3 3–4 hrs Students design their own experiments to explore the fundamental force of gravity, and then extend their thinking to how gravity acts to keep objects like moons and ring particles in orbit. Students use the contexts of the Solar System and the Saturn system MEETS NATIONAL to explore the nature of orbits. The lesson SCIENCE EDUCATION enables students to correct common mis- STANDARDS: conceptions about gravity and orbits and to Science as Inquiry • Abilities learn how orbital speed decreases as the dis- Prometheus and Pandora, two of Saturn’s moons, “shepherd” necessary to Saturn’s F ring. scientific inquiry tance from the object being orbited increases. Physical Science • Motions and PREREQUISITE SKILLS BACKGROUND INFORMATION forces Working in groups Background for Lesson Discussion, page 66 Earth and Space Science Reading a chart of data Questions, page 71 • Earth in the Plotting points on a graph Answers in Appendix 1, page 225 Solar System 1–21: Saturn 22–34: Rings 35–50: Moons EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, AND TOOLS For the teacher Materials to reproduce Photocopier (for transparencies & copies) Figures 1–10 are provided at the end of Overhead projector this lesson. Chalkboard, whiteboard, or large easel FIGURE TRANSPARENCY COPIES with paper; chalk or markers 11 21 For each group of 3 to 4 students 31 Large plastic or rubber ball 4 1 per student Paper, markers, pencils 5 1 1 per student 6 1 for teacher 7 1 (optional) 1 for teacher 8 1 per student 9 1 (optional) 1 per student 10 1 (optional) 1 for teacher 65 Saturn Educator Guide • Cassini Program website — http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/cassini/educatorguide • EG-1999-12-008-JPL Background for Lesson Discussion LESSON 3 Science as inquiry The nature of Saturn’s rings and how (See Procedures & Activities, Part I, Steps 1-6) they move (See Procedures & Activities, Part IIa, Step 3) Part I of the lesson offers students a good oppor- tunity to experience science as inquiry.
[Show full text]
Titan and the Moons of Saturn Telesto Titan
The Icy Moons and the Extended Habitable Zone Europa Interior Models Other Types of Habitable Zones Water requires heat and pressure to remain stable as a liquid Extended Habitable Zones • You do not need sunlight. • You do need liquid water • You do need an energy source. Saturn and its Satellites • Saturn is nearly twice as far from the Sun as Jupiter • Saturn gets ~30% of Jupiter’s sunlight: It is commensurately colder Prometheus • Saturn has 82 known satellites (plus the rings) • 7 major • 27 regular • 4 Trojan • 55 irregular • Others in rings Titan • Titan is nearly as large as Ganymede Titan and the Moons of Saturn Telesto Titan Prometheus Dione Titan Janus Pandora Enceladus Mimas Rhea Pan • . • . Titan The second-largest moon in the Solar System The only moon with a substantial atmosphere 90% N2 + CH4, Ar, C2H6, C3H8, C2H2, HCN, CO2 Equilibrium Temperatures 2 1/4 Recall that TEQ ~ (L*/d ) Planet Distance (au) TEQ (K) Mercury 0.38 400 Venus 0.72 291 Earth 1.00 247 Mars 1.52 200 Jupiter 5.20 108 Saturn 9.53 80 Uranus 19.2 56 Neptune 30.1 45 The Atmosphere of Titan Pressure: 1.5 bars Temperature: 95 K Condensation sequence: • Jovian Moons: H2O ice • Saturnian Moons: NH3, CH4 2NH3 + sunlight è N2 + 3H2 CH4 + sunlight è CH, CH2 Implications of Methane Free CH4 requires replenishment • Liquid methane on the surface? Hazy atmosphere/clouds may suggest methane/ ethane precipitation. The freezing points of CH4 and C2H6 are 91 and 92K, respectively. (Titan has a mean temperature of 95K) (Liquid natural gas anyone?) This atmosphere may resemble the primordial terrestrial atmosphere.
[Show full text]
Observing the Universe
ObservingObserving thethe UniverseUniverse :: aa TravelTravel ThroughThrough SpaceSpace andand TimeTime Enrico Flamini Agenzia Spaziale Italiana Tokyo 2009 When you rise your head to the night sky, what your eyes are observing may be astonishing. However it is only a small portion of the electromagnetic spectrum of the Universe: the visible . But any electromagnetic signal, indipendently from its frequency, travels at the speed of light. When we observe a star or a galaxy we see the photons produced at the moment of their production, their travel could have been incredibly long: it may be lasted millions or billions of years. Looking at the sky at frequencies much higher then visible, like in the X-ray or gamma-ray energy range, we can observe the so called “violent sky” where extremely energetic fenoena occurs.like Pulsar, quasars, AGN, Supernova CosmicCosmic RaysRays:: messengersmessengers fromfrom thethe extremeextreme universeuniverse We cannot see the deep universe at E > few TeV, since photons are attenuated through →e± on the CMB + IR backgrounds. But using cosmic rays we should be able to ‘see’ up to ~ 6 x 1010 GeV before they get attenuated by other interaction. Sources Sources → Primordial origin Primordial 7 Redshift z = 0 (t = 13.7 Gyr = now ! ) Going to a frequency lower then the visible light, and cooling down the instrument nearby absolute zero, it’s possible to observe signals produced millions or billions of years ago: we may travel near the instant of the formation of our universe: 13.7 By. Redshift z = 1.4 (t = 4.7 Gyr) Credits A. Cimatti Univ. Bologna Redshift z = 5.7 (t = 1 Gyr) Credits A.
[Show full text]
PDS4 Context List
Target Context List Name Type LID 136108 HAUMEA Planet urn:nasa:pds:context:target:planet.136108_haumea 136472 MAKEMAKE Planet urn:nasa:pds:context:target:planet.136472_makemake 1989N1 Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.1989n1 1989N2 Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.1989n2 ADRASTEA Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.adrastea AEGAEON Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.aegaeon AEGIR Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.aegir ALBIORIX Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.albiorix AMALTHEA Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.amalthea ANTHE Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.anthe APXSSITE Equipment urn:nasa:pds:context:target:equipment.apxssite ARIEL Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.ariel ATLAS Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.atlas BEBHIONN Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.bebhionn BERGELMIR Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.bergelmir BESTIA Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.bestia BESTLA Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.bestla BIAS Calibrator urn:nasa:pds:context:target:calibrator.bias BLACK SKY Calibration Field urn:nasa:pds:context:target:calibration_field.black_sky CAL Calibrator urn:nasa:pds:context:target:calibrator.cal CALIBRATION Calibrator urn:nasa:pds:context:target:calibrator.calibration CALIMG Calibrator urn:nasa:pds:context:target:calibrator.calimg CAL LAMPS Calibrator urn:nasa:pds:context:target:calibrator.cal_lamps CALLISTO Satellite urn:nasa:pds:context:target:satellite.callisto
[Show full text]
Accretion of Saturn's Mid-Sized Moons During the Viscous
Accretion of Saturn’s mid-sized moons during the viscous spreading of young massive rings: solving the paradox of silicate-poor rings versus silicate-rich moons. Sébastien CHARNOZ *,1 Aurélien CRIDA 2 Julie C. CASTILLO-ROGEZ 3 Valery LAINEY 4 Luke DONES 5 Özgür KARATEKIN 6 Gabriel TOBIE 7 Stephane MATHIS 1 Christophe LE PONCIN-LAFITTE 8 Julien SALMON 5,1 (1) Laboratoire AIM, UMR 7158, Université Paris Diderot /CEA IRFU /CNRS, Centre de l’Orme les Merisiers, 91191, Gif sur Yvette Cedex France (2) Université de Nice Sophia-antipolis / C.N.R.S. / Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur Laboratoire Cassiopée UMR6202, BP4229, 06304 NICE cedex 4, France (3) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, M/S 79-24, 4800 Oak Drive Pasadena, CA 91109 USA (4) IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8028 CNRS / UPMC, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France (5) Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA (6) Royal Observatory of Belgium, Avenue Circulaire 3, 1180 Uccle, Bruxelles, Belgium (7) Université de Nantes, UFR des Sciences et des Techniques, Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, 2 rue de la Houssinière, B.P. 92208, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France (8) SyRTE, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8630 du CNRS, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France (*) To whom correspondence should be addressed ([email protected]) 1 ABSTRACT The origin of Saturn’s inner mid-sized moons (Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione and Rhea) and Saturn’s rings is debated. Charnoz et al. (2010) introduced the idea that the smallest inner moons could form from the spreading of the rings’ edge while Salmon et al.
[Show full text]
Rings and Moons of Saturn 1 Rings and Moons of Saturn
PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 1 Rings and Moons of Saturn PTYS/ASTR 206 – The Golden Age of Planetary Exploration Shane Byrne – [email protected] PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 2 In this lecture… Rings Discovery What they are How to form rings The Roche limit Dynamics Voyager II – 1981 Gaps and resonances Shepherd moons Voyager I – 1980 – Titan Inner moons Tectonics and craters Cassini – ongoing Enceladus – a very special case Outer Moons Captured Phoebe Iapetus and Hyperion Spray-painted with Phoebe debris PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 3 We can divide Saturn’s system into three main parts… The A-D ring zone Ring gaps and shepherd moons The E ring zone Ring supplies by Enceladus Tethys, Dione and Rhea have a lot of similarities The distant satellites Iapetus, Hyperion, Phoebe Linked together by exchange of material PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 4 Discovery of Saturn’s Rings Discovered by Galileo Appearance in 1610 baffled him “…to my very great amazement Saturn was seen to me to be not a single star, but three together, which almost touch each other" It got more confusing… In 1612 the extra “stars” had disappeared “…I do not know what to say…" PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 5 In 1616 the extra ‘stars’ were back Galileo’s telescope had improved He saw two “half-ellipses” He died in 1642 and never figured it out In the 1650s Huygens figured out that Saturn was surrounded by a flat disk The disk disappears when seen edge on He discovered Saturn’s
[Show full text]
Multi-Body Mission Design in the Saturnian System with Emphasis on Enceladus Accessibility
MULTI-BODY MISSION DESIGN IN THE SATURNIAN SYSTEM WITH EMPHASIS ON ENCELADUS ACCESSIBILITY A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Todd S. Brown In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science December 2008 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii “My Guide and I crossed over and began to mount that little known and lightless road to ascend into the shining world again. He first, I second, without thought of rest we climbed the dark until we reached the point where a round opening brought in sight the blest and beauteous shining of the Heavenly cars. And we walked out once more beneath the Stars.” -Dante Alighieri (The Inferno) Like Dante, I could not have followed the path to this point in my life without the tireless aid of a guiding hand. I owe all my thanks to the boundless support I have received from my parents. They have never sacrificed an opportunity to help me to grow into a better person, and all that I know of success, I learned from them. I’m eternally grateful that their love and nurturing, and I’m also grateful that they instilled a passion for learning in me, that I carry to this day. I also thank my sister, Alayne, who has always been the role-model that I strove to emulate. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge and extend my thanks my academic advisor, Professor Kathleen Howell, for both pointing me in the right direction and giving me the freedom to approach my research at my own pace.
[Show full text]
Jovian Planets
Northeastern Illinois University Jovian Planets Greg Anderson Department of Physics & Astronomy Northeastern Illinois University Winter-Spring 2020 c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 1 / 81 Northeastern Illinois Outline University Overview Jovian Planets Jovian Moons Ring Systems Review c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 2 / 81 Northeastern Illinois University Outline Overview Orbital Periods Solar System Jovian Planets Jovian Moons Ring Systems Review Overview c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 3 / 81 Northeastern Illinois Orbital Properties of Planets University Name Distance (AU) Period (years) Speed (AU/yr) Mercury 0.387 0.2409 10.09 Venus 0.723 0.6152 7.384 Earth 1.0 1.0 6.283 Mars 1.524 1.881 5.09 Jupiter 5.203 11.86 2.756 Saturn 9.539 29.42 2.037 Uranus 19.19 84.01 1.435 Neptune 30.06 164.8 1.146 c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 4 / 81 M J S M J U S M J N Northeastern Illinois University Outline Overview Jovian Planets Jovian Planets Planetary Densities Composition Composition H & He Formation Escape Velocity Jovian Planets Formation 2 Q: Jovian Interiors Jovian Densities 02A 02 Q: Jupiter and Saturn Q: Jupiter’s composition Jovian Interiors Jovian Interiors Jupiter Jupiter Lithograph Jupiter Jupiter Jupiter from Io Interior c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 6 / 81 Northeastern Illinois Jovian Planets University Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune 3 d⊙ R⊕ M⊕ ρ (g/cm ) tilt T (K) Jupiter 5.20 AU 11.21 317.9 1.33 3.1◦ 125 Saturn 9.54 AU 9.45 95.2 0.71 26.7◦ 75 Uranus 19.19 AU 4.01 14.5 1.24 97.9◦ 60 Neptune 30.06 AU 3.88 17.1 1.67 29.◦ 60 c 2012-2020 G.
[Show full text]
Index of Astronomia Nova
Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. Géodésie générale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. Géodésie générale,Vol.4:Géodésie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K.
[Show full text]