DOCSLIB.ORG

Intelligence-Led Policing: the New Intelligence Architecture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intelligence-Led Policing: the New Intelligence Architecture Bureau of Justice Assistance ofJustice Bureau ofJustice Programs Office U.S. N EW R E A L I TI E S ofJustice Department Law Enforcement in the Post­9/ 11 Era Architecture Intelligence The New Policing: Intelligence-Led Bureau of Justice Assistance U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street NW. Washington, DC 20531 Alberto R. Gonzales Attorney General Regina B. Schofield Assistant Attorney General Domingo S. Herraiz Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs Partnerships for Safer Communities www.ojp.usdoj.gov Bureau of Justice Assistance www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA NCJ 210681 Written by Marilyn Peterson This document was prepared by the International Association of Chiefs of Police under cooperative agreement number 2003–DD–BX–K002 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Pr ograms, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Intelligence-Led Policing: The New Intelligence Architecture September 2005 NCJ 210681 Bureau of Justice Assistance Acknowledgments Post­9/11 Policing Project Staff ■ National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives The Post-9/11 Policing Project is the work of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), Jessie Lee, Executive Director, served as National Sheriffs’ Association (NSA), National NOBLE’s Project Director and conducted most Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives staff work. (NOBLE), Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA), and Police Foundation. Jerry Needle, Director of Programs ■ Major Cities Chiefs Association and Research, IACP, provided overall project direction. Dr. Phyllis McDonald, Division of Public Safety ■ International Association of Chiefs of Police Leadership, Johns Hopkins University, directed the work of the Major Cities Chiefs Association. Phil Lynn served as IACP’s Project Director, The MCCA team included Denis O’Keefe, managed development and publication of the Consultant; Corinne Martin, Program four Promising Practices Briefs, and authored Coordinator; and Shannon Feldpush. Mutual Aid: Multijurisdictional Partnerships for Meeting Regional Threats. Andrew Morabito Dr. Sheldon Greenberg, Director of the Division coauthored Engaging the Private Sector To of Public Safety Leadership, coauthored Promote Homeland Security: Law Enforcement- Engaging the Private Sector To Promote Private Security Partnerships, and analyzed Homeland Security: Law Enforcement-Private Post-9/11 survey data. Col. Joel Leson, Director, Security Partnerships. IACP Center for Police Leadership, authored Assessing and Managing the Terrorism Threat. ■ The Police Foundation Walter Tangel served as initial Project Director. Edwin Hamilton directed Police Foundation Dr. Ellen Scrivner, Deputy Superintendent, project activities and managed Post-9/11 survey Bureau of Administrative Services, Chicago formatting and analysis, assisted by Rob Davis. Police Department, contributed to all phases of Foundation consultants included Inspector Garth project design and cofacilitated the Post-9/11 den Heyer of the New Zealand Police and Steve Roundtables with Jerry Needle. Marilyn Johnson of the Washington State Patrol. Peterson, Management Specialist–Intelligence, New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice, authored this monograph—Intelligence-Led Promising Practices Reviews Policing: The New Intelligence Architecture. Promising Practices drafts were critiqued and enriched by a series of practitioners/content experts, including ■ National Sheriffs’ Association Richard Cashdollar, Executive Director of Public Fred Wilson, Director of Training, directed Safety, City of Mobile, AL; George Franscell, NSA project activities, organized and managed Attorney-at-Law, Franscell, Strickland, Roberts and Post-9/11 Roundtables, and worked closely with Lawrence, Los Angeles, CA; Mary Beth Michos, State IACP staff throughout the course of the project. Mutual Aid Coordinator, Prince William County, VA; NSA project consultants included Chris Tutko, David Bostrom, Manager, Community Policing Director of NSA’s Neighborhood Watch Project; Consortium, IACP; John P. Chase, Chief of Staff, John Matthews; and Dr. Jeff Walker, University Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection, of Arkansas, Little Rock. Department of Homeland Security; John M. Clark, iii Assistant Vice President/Chief of Police, Burlington ■ Thomas N. Faust, Executive Director, National Northern Santa Fe Railroad; John A. LeCours, Sheriffs’ Association Director/Intelligence, Transport Canada; Ronald W. Olin, Chief of Police, Lawrence, KS; ■ Jessie Lee, Executive Director, National Ed Jopeck, Analyst, Veridian; Jerry Marynik, Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives Administrator, State Terrorism Threat Assessment Center, California Department of Justice; and Bart ■ Thomas C. Frazier, Executive Director, Major Johnson, Office of Counter-Terrorism, New York Cities Chiefs Association State Police. ■ Hubert Williams, President, The Police Foundation Executive Oversight Bureau of Justice Assistance Guidance The Post-9/11 Policing Project was initially We gratefully acknowledge the technical guidance conceptualized by the Office of Justice Programs, and patient cooperation of executives and program U.S. Department of Justice. Since its inception, the managers who helped fashion project work: James H. project has been guided throughout by the chief Burch II, Deputy Director; Michelle Shaw, Policy executive officers of the partner associations: Advisor; and Steven Edwards, Ph.D., Senior Policy Advisor for Law Enforcement. ■ Daniel N. Rosenblatt, Executive Director, International Association of Chiefs of Police iv Contents Acknowledgments . .iii Executive Summary . .vii Introduction . .1 Intelligence Issues . .3 How We Got Where We Are Today: An Overview of Intelligence History . .5 Where We Stand Today . .9 What We Need To Do . .15 Appendix A: Information Sharing and Information Technology Resources . .25 Appendix B: Sources of Intelligence Products . .29 Appendix C: Intelligence Training and Resources . .35 Appendix D: Criminal Intelligence Model Policy . .39 Endnotes . .45 Bibliography . .49 v Executive Summary he terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 revealed community infrastructures such as those related to Tthe life-and-death importance of enhancing U.S. food, agriculture, public health, telecommunications, intelligence operations. Since that day, a tremendous energy, transportation, and banking are now seen as amount of attention has been focused on the need for potential terrorist targets. As a result, parts of the constructive changes in law enforcement intelligence. community that previously did not receive much notice from state and local law enforcement agencies Intelligence operations have been reviewed, studied, now require keen attention. Personnel who work in and slowly but steadily transformed. Most efforts have these and other key industries are now partners in focused on reorganizing intelligence infrastructures at terrorism prevention and crime control. Similarly, the federal level; however, corresponding efforts have community- and problem-oriented policing must been made to enhance state and local law enforcement be integrated into intelligence operations to address intelligence operations. Such enhancements make it conventional crime issues. Engaging and collaborating possible for state and local law enforcement agencies with the community at all levels are essential. to play a role in homeland security. Perhaps more important, improvements to intelligence operations Intelligence-led policing is a collaborative enterprise help local law enforcement respond to “traditional” based on improved intelligence operations and crimes more effectively. community-oriented policing and problem solving, which the field has considered beneficial for many Because effective intelligence operations can be years. To implement intelligence-led policing, police applied equally well to terrorist threats and crimes in organizations need to reevaluate their current policies the community, homeland security and local crime and protocols. Intelligence must be incorporated into prevention are not mutually exclusive. Officers “on the planning process to reflect community problems the beat” are an excellent resource for gathering and issues. Information sharing must become a policy, information on all kinds of potential threats and not an informal practice. Most important, intelligence vulnerabilities. However, the intelligence operations must be contingent on quality analysis of data. The of state and local law enforcement agencies often are development of analytical techniques, training, and plagued by a lack of policies, procedures, and training technical assistance needs to be supported. for gathering and assessing essential information. Because of size and limited budgets, not all agencies To correct this problem, fundamental changes are can employ intelligence analysts or intelligence officers. needed in the way information is gathered, assessed, Nonetheless, all law enforcement agencies have a role and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Infidelity Resource Guide
    Infdelity Resource Guide Tools to help you on the path of recovery from infidelity. by Esther Perel Infdelity Resource Guide - Table of Contents Table of Contents Part 1: Overview - Who is this for, and how can I use it? Part 2: Phases of Recovery Part 3: The Need to Know and to Understand: Detective vs. Investigative Questions Part 4: "After the Storm" - An Article I wrote for the Psychotherapy Networker Infdelity Resource Guide - Overview Who is this Guide For? This guide is for anyone seeking understanding, stability, and hope in the aftermath of an infidelity. You may be the person who had an affair(s), the hurt partner, the lover, the adult children of a couple in the midst of an infidelity, or a close friend or family member of a person in the throes of the crisis. I hope this offers you a preliminary framework for understanding and contextualizing. Of course, if you are in the throes of a post-affair revelation, or further down that road, there is no substitute for speaking with a trained psychotherapist. Isuggestseekingthehelpofaprofessionalforthoseofyoucurrentlydealing with infidelity. How Can I Use this Guide? These resources are meant to be a conversation starter. In the midst of a crisis, there is so much to say, and we often struggle to put our thoughts and feelings into words. We need structure, calm, and reassurance to figure out what happened and what to do about it. This booklet is to here to accompany you, but is not a substitute for speaking with a trained psychotherapist. If you are in a couple, you can read it alone, or together.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Weapons of Mass Destruction an Update
    A NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE UNIVERSITY PRESIDENTIAL SCHOLAR’S PAPER THE FUTURE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AN UPDATE By John P. Caves, Jr. NIU Presidential Scholar November 2019 – November 2020 and W. Seth Carus THE FUTURE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AN UPDATE John P. Caves, Jr. and W. Seth Carus National Intelligence University National Intelligence Press Washington, DC February 2021 The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Intelligence University, National Defense University, or any other part of the U.S. government. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS While the authors are solely responsible for the final content of this paper, they benefited greatly from the time, expertise and support freely availed to them by many knowledgeable individuals and organizations. They include Mr. Caves’ colleagues at National Intelligence University (NIU), where he worked on this paper while on a detail assignment from National Defense University (NDU). Mr. Caves expresses par- ticular gratitude to Dr. Brian Holmes, dean of the Anthony G. Oettinger School of Science and Technol- ogy Intelligence, for his leadership, knowledge, and support. Dr. Sharon Adams, Ms. Beverly Barnhart, Mr. George Clifford, Dr. LaMesha Craft, and Dr. R. Carter Morris offered helpful comments on the paper at various stages. They and Mr. Damarius Alston, LTC Jeffrey Bacon, Lt Col Frances Deutch, Ms. Thelma Flamer, Mr. Julian Meade, and Ms. Christina Sanders were among others at NIU whose assistance and support made Mr. Caves’ assignment at NIU enjoyable as well as productive. Both authors are deeply indebted to their colleagues at NDU’s Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction (CSWMD), especially Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Parlatore L a W G R O U P
    PARLATORE L A W G R O U P 19 November 2019 Office of Inspector General United States Department of Defense, 4800 Mark Center Drive Alexandria, VA 22350-1500 Re: Complaint of Edward R. Gallagher We respectfully submit this complaint on behalf of Special Warfare Operator Chief Petty Officer (SOC) Edward R. Gallagher, United States Navy. For almost two years, SOC Gallagher has suffered irreparable damage at the hands of multiple individuals and entities within the Department of Defense. We are writing to you directly, because of the breadth of the issues, individuals, and commands involved. This complaint encompasses Naval Criminal Investigative Services (NCIS), Office of the Judge Advocate General (OJAG), both the Chief of Staff and the Southwest Region Legal Services Office (COS RLSO and RLSO SW), Chief of Navy Information (CHINFO) and Naval Special Warfare Command (WARCOM) and its subordinate units. As this complaint encompasses abuse by several different DON components, as well as Intelligence Oversight, restriction and retaliation, we believe that your office is the most appropriate to handle this matter. As you might be aware, SOC Gallagher was the defendant in a recent, highly-publicized court-martial related to his deployment to Mosul, Iraq as the Platoon Chief of Alpha Platoon, SEAL Team 7 (ST-7) from 6 February 2017 – 1 September 2017. Although he was charged with an array of offenses, including Murder and Attempted Murder, he was acquitted of those fabricated charges after a jury trial. The purpose of this complaint is not to re-litigate the case itself, but rather to seek accountability for the severe misconduct committed by the investigators, prosecutors, and the command before, during, and after the trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Nettleton Indictment
    Case 3:19-cr-00001-TJC-PDB Document 1 Filed 01/08/19 Page 1 of 36 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2D'" ,,I '. -J Ii .. .. JACKSONVILLE DIVISION 1/1:2) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1 ,,__[ :: V. Case No. 3:19-cr- 1-'7- 3;;2.. fD{> Ct. 1: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(b)(3) and 2 JOHN R. NETTLETON Ct. 2: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2) and 2 Ct. 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ IO0I(a)(l) and 2 Cts. 4-5: 18 U .S.C. §§ 1519 and 2 Cts. 6-1 0: 18 U.S.C. § I00I(a)(2) INDICTMENT The Grand Jury charges: Unless otherwise indicated, at all times material to this Indictment: BACKGROUND 1. The defendant, JOHN R. NETTLETON ("NETTLETON") is a Captain in the United States Navy ("Navy"), a department of the United States government. In or about June 2012, he was named the Commanding Officer ("Commander") of Naval Station Guantanamo Bay ("GTMO") at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 2. GTMO, located in the southeast comer of Cuba, is a U.S. military installation that serves the Navy. Several thousand U.S. military members, civilian personnel, and their families reside at GTMO. 3. GTMO is part of the Navy Region Southeast ("NRSE"), which is based at Naval Air Station Jacksonville, located in Jacksonville, Florida. As the Commander of GTMO, NETTLETON reported to the Commander of the Navy Case 3:19-cr-00001-TJC-PDB Document 1 Filed 01/08/19 Page 2 of 36 PageID 2 Region Southeast ("CNRSE") and the members of his or her command staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Super! Drama TV April 2021
    Super! drama TV April 2021 Note: #=serial number [J]=in Japanese 2021.03.29 2021.03.30 2021.03.31 2021.04.01 2021.04.02 2021.04.03 2021.04.04 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 06:00 06:00 TWILIGHT ZONE Season 5 06:00 TWILIGHT ZONE Season 5 06:00 06:00 TWILIGHT ZONE Season 5 06:00 TWILIGHT ZONE Season 5 06:00 #15 #17 #19 #21 「The Long Morrow」 「Number 12 Looks Just Like You」 「Night Call」 「Spur of the Moment」 06:30 06:30 TWILIGHT ZONE Season 5 #16 06:30 TWILIGHT ZONE Season 5 06:30 06:30 TWILIGHT ZONE Season 5 06:30 TWILIGHT ZONE Season 5 06:30 「The Self-Improvement of Salvadore #18 #20 #22 Ross」 「Black Leather Jackets」 「From Agnes - With Love」 「Queen of the Nile」 07:00 07:00 CRIMINAL MINDS Season 10 07:00 CRIMINAL MINDS Season 10 07:00 07:00 STAR TREK Season 1 07:00 THUNDERBIRDS 07:00 #1 #2 #20 #19 「X」 「Burn」 「Court Martial」 「DANGER AT OCEAN DEEP」 07:30 07:30 07:30 08:00 08:00 THE BIG BANG THEORY Season 08:00 THE BIG BANG THEORY Season 08:00 08:00 ULTRAMAN towards the future 08:00 THUNDERBIRDS 08:00 10 10 #1 #20 #13「The Romance Recalibration」 #15「The Locomotion Reverberation」 「bitter harvest」 「MOVE- AND YOU'RE DEAD」 08:30 08:30 THE BIG BANG THEORY Season 08:30 THE BIG BANG THEORY Season 08:30 08:30 THE BIG BANG THEORY Season 08:30 10 #14「The Emotion Detection 10 12 Automation」 #16「The Allowance Evaporation」 #6「The Imitation Perturbation」 09:00 09:00 information[J] 09:00 information[J] 09:00 09:00 information[J] 09:00 information[J] 09:00 09:30 09:30 THE GREAT 09:30 SUPERNATURAL Season 14 09:30 09:30 BETTER CALL SAUL Season 3 09:30 ZOEY’S EXTRAORDINARY
    [Show full text]
  • JMP Securities Elite 80 Report (Formerly Super 70)
    Cybersecurity, Data Management & ,7 Infrastructure FEBRUARY 201 ELITE 80 THE HOTTEST PRIVATELY HELD &<%(5SECURITY, '$7$0$1$*(0(17 AND ,7,1)5$6758&785( COMPANIES &RS\ULJKWWLWLSRQJSZO6KXWWHUVWRFNFRP Erik Suppiger Patrick Walravens Michael Berg [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (415) 835-3918 (415) 835-8943 (415)-835-3914 FOR DISCLOSURE AND FOOTNOTE INFORMATION, REFER TO JMP FACTS AND DISCLOSURES SECTION. Cybersecurity, Data Management & IT Infrastructure TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 Top Trends and Technological Changes ............................................................................................ 5 Funding Trends ................................................................................................................................ 11 Index by Venture Capital Firm .......................................................................................................... 17 Actifio ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Alert Logic ......................................................................................................................................... 23 AlgoSec ............................................................................................................................................ 24 AnchorFree ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL PATRICIA L. BELLIA WikiLeaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures ABSTRACT. WikiLeaks' successive disclosures of classified U.S. documents throughout 2010 and 2011 invite comparison to publishers' decisions forty years ago to release portions of the Pentagon Papers, the classified analytic history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The analogy is a powerful weapon for WikiLeaks' defenders. The Supreme Court's decision in the Pentagon Papers case signaled that the task of weighing whether to publicly disclose leaked national security information would fall to publishers, not the executive or the courts, at least in the absence of an exceedingly grave threat of harm. The lessons of the PentagonPapers case for WikiLeaks, however, are more complicated than they may first appear. The Court's per curiam opinion masks areas of substantial disagreement as well as a number of shared assumptions among the Court's members. Specifically, the Pentagon Papers case reflects an institutional framework for downstream disclosure of leaked national security information, under which publishers within the reach of U.S. law would weigh the potential harms and benefits of disclosure against the backdrop of potential criminal penalties and recognized journalistic norms. The WikiLeaks disclosures show the instability of this framework by revealing new challenges for controlling the downstream disclosure of leaked information and the corresponding likelihood of "unintermediated" disclosure by an insider; the risks of non-media intermediaries attempting to curtail such disclosures, in response to government pressure or otherwise; and the pressing need to prevent and respond to leaks at the source. AUTHOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Queer Expertise: Urban Policing and the Construction of Public Knowledge About Homosexuality, 1920–1970
    Queer Expertise: Urban Policing and the Construction of Public Knowledge About Homosexuality, 1920–1970 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Lvovsky, Anna. 2015. Queer Expertise: Urban Policing and the Construction of Public Knowledge About Homosexuality, 1920–1970. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17463142 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Queer Expertise: Urban Policing and the Construction of Public Knowledge about Homosexuality, 1920–1970 A dissertation presented by Anna Lvovsky to The Committee on Higher Degrees in the History of American Civilization in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of American Civilization Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 – Anna Lvovsky All rights reserved. Advisor: Nancy Cott Anna Lvovsky Queer Expertise: Urban Policing and the Construction of Public Knowledge about Homosexuality, 1920–1970 Abstract This dissertation tracks how urban police tactics against homosexuality participated in the construction, ratification, and dissemination of authoritative public knowledge about gay men in the
    [Show full text]
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Super! Drama TV December 2020 ▶Programs Are Suspended for Equipment Maintenance from 1:00-7:00 on the 15Th
    Super! drama TV December 2020 ▶Programs are suspended for equipment maintenance from 1:00-7:00 on the 15th. Note: #=serial number [J]=in Japanese [D]=in Danish 2020.11.30 2020.12.01 2020.12.02 2020.12.03 2020.12.04 2020.12.05 2020.12.06 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 06:00 06:00 MACGYVER Season 2 06:00 MACGYVER Season 2 06:00 MACGYVER Season 2 06:00 MACGYVER Season 2 06:00 06:00 MACGYVER Season 3 06:00 BELOW THE SURFACE 06:00 #20 #21 #22 #23 #1 #8 [D] 「Skyscraper - Power」 「Wind + Water」 「UFO + Area 51」 「MacGyver + MacGyver」 「Improvise」 06:30 06:30 06:30 07:00 07:00 THE BIG BANG THEORY 07:00 THE BIG BANG THEORY 07:00 THE BIG BANG THEORY 07:00 THE BIG BANG THEORY 07:00 07:00 STAR TREK Season 1 07:00 STAR TREK: THE NEXT 07:00 Season 12 Season 12 Season 12 Season 12 #4 GENERATION Season 7 #7「The Grant Allocation Derivation」 #9 「The Citation Negation」 #11「The Paintball Scattering」 #13「The Confirmation Polarization」 「The Naked Time」 #15 07:30 07:30 THE BIG BANG THEORY 07:30 THE BIG BANG THEORY 07:30 THE BIG BANG THEORY 07:30 information [J] 07:30 「LOWER DECKS」 07:30 Season 12 Season 12 Season 12 #8「The Consummation Deviation」 #10「The VCR Illumination」 #12「The Propagation Proposition」 08:00 08:00 SUPERNATURAL Season 11 08:00 SUPERNATURAL Season 11 08:00 SUPERNATURAL Season 11 08:00 SUPERNATURAL Season 11 08:00 08:00 THUNDERBIRDS ARE GO 08:00 STAR TREK: THE NEXT 08:00 #5 #6 #7 #8 Season 3 GENERATION Season 7 「Thin Lizzie」 「Our Little World」 「Plush」 「Just My Imagination」 #18「AVALANCHE」 #16 08:30 08:30 08:30 THUNDERBIRDS ARE GO 「THINE OWN SELF」 08:30
    [Show full text]
  • Trend Analysis the Israeli Unit 8200 an OSINT-Based Study CSS
    CSS CYBER DEFENSE PROJECT Trend Analysis The Israeli Unit 8200 An OSINT-based study Zürich, December 2019 Risk and Resilience Team Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study Author: Sean Cordey © 2019 Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich Contact: Center for Security Studies Haldeneggsteig 4 ETH Zurich CH-8092 Zurich Switzerland Tel.: +41-44-632 40 25 [email protected] www.css.ethz.ch Analysis prepared by: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich ETH-CSS project management: Tim Prior, Head of the Risk and Resilience Research Group, Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Deputy Head for Research and Teaching; Andreas Wenger, Director of the CSS Disclaimer: The opinions presented in this study exclusively reflect the authors’ views. Please cite as: Cordey, S. (2019). Trend Analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich. 1 Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study . Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Historical Background 5 2.1 Pre-independence intelligence units 5 2.2 Post-independence unit: former capabilities, missions, mandate and techniques 5 2.3 The Yom Kippur War and its consequences 6 3 Operational Background 8 3.1 Unit mandate, activities and capabilities 8 3.2 Attributed and alleged operations 8 3.3 International efforts and cooperation 9 4 Organizational and Cultural Background 10 4.1 Organizational structure 10 Structure and sub-units 10 Infrastructure 11 4.2 Selection and training process 12 Attractiveness and motivation 12 Screening process 12 Selection process 13 Training process 13 Service, reserve and alumni 14 4.3 Internal culture 14 5 Discussion and Analysis 16 5.1 Strengths 16 5.2 Weaknesses 17 6 Conclusion and Recommendations 18 7 Glossary 20 8 Abbreviations 20 9 Bibliography 21 2 Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study selection tests comprise a psychometric test, rigorous Executive Summary interviews, and an education/skills test.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis
    C O R P O R A T I O N LANCE MENTHE, DAHLIA ANNE GOLDFELD, ABBIE TINGSTAD, SHERRILL LINGEL, EDWARD GEIST, DONALD BRUNK, AMANDA WICKER, SARAH SOLIMAN, BALYS GINTAUTAS, ANNE STICKELLS, AMADO CORDOVA Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis Volume 2, Technical Analysis and Supporting Material RR-A341-2_cover.indd All Pages 2/8/21 12:20 PM For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA341-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0633-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. William Chockey; faraktinov, Adobe Stock. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
    [Show full text]