DOCSLIB.ORG

Basin 18 Yadkin-Pee Dee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Basin 18 Yadkin-Pee Dee BASIN 18 YADKIN-PEE DEE BASIN DESCRIPTION The Yadkin-Pee Dee Basin is the northern portion of a large river system that drains central North Carolina and northeastern South Carolina. The basin is divided into four sub-basins. The headwaters of the Yadkin River drain the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains, northeast of Blowing Rock. In the upper part of the basin the Yadkin flows generally northeasterly for about 100 miles before turning south. It continues flowing southeasterly and merges with the Uwharrie River east of Albemarle, NC, to form the Pee Dee River. The Rocky River flows into the mainstem below Lake Tillery. The Pee Dee continues flowing southeastward through Local Water Supply Plans (LWSPs) South Carolina, where it is known as the Great Pee Dee River, All units of local government that supply or plan to and flows into the Atlantic Ocean near Georgetown, SC. supply water to the public are required to develop a LWSP. There are series of impoundments on the river in The Division of Water Resources (DWR) reviews LWSPs and North Carolina, beginning with W. Kerr Scott Lake west of maintains a database of the LWSP information. The current Wilkesboro. The mainstem is impounded for about 50 miles database reflects water use information for 1992. by a chain of lakes consisting of High Rock Lake, Tuckertown LWSPs were submitted by 74 public water systems Reservoir, Badin Lake, and Lake Tillery. The South Yadkin having service area in this basin or using water from this basin. River drains 909 square miles north and west of Salisbury. It These systems supplied 236 mgd of water to 1,311,123 flows into the Yadkin above High Rock Lake. The Uwharrie persons. DWR estimated that 764,721of the 1,311,123 persons River drains 374 square miles west of Asheboro. The served by these 74 LWSP systems receive water from the Uwharrie joins the Yadkin below Badin Lake and the river Yadkin Basin. Of the 236 mgd supplied by these 74 LWSP flows into Lake Tillery as the Pee Dee River. The Rocky River systems, 152 mgd comes from water sources in the Yadkin drains 1440 square miles south of Kannapolis between Basin, with the remainder coming from adjoining basins. The Charlotte and Albemarle. It flows into the Pee Dee where following table summarizes the LWSP population served with Richmond and Stanly counties meet. Below Lake Tillery there water from this basin and their water use for 1992. is one more major impoundment, Blewett Falls Lake, before the Pee Dee flows into South Carolina. 1992 LWSP System Water Use from Basin (mgd) LWSP Residential Non-residential Total Sub-basin WATER USE Population Use Use Use* Factors Affecting Water Demand Yadkin River 560,246 34.11 54.44 111.7 This basin is home to about 17% of the State’s So. Yadkin 55,924 4.51 3.14 9.6 residents and contains all or part of 86 municipalities in 23 Uwharrie R. 21,064 1.12 2.94 4.7 counties. Three of the state’s 12 major metropolitan areas Rocky River 127,487 7.76 12.82 25.9 depend on this basin for water supply. From 1990 to 1997 Total 764,721 47.50 73.3 151.9 year-round population in 13 counties in this basin grew by *Total Use also includes unaccounted-for water and sales to other systems. 10% or more. One county, Union, grew by 26% over that period. This basin supplies water to the rapidly growing Residential use accounted for 31% of total water use Piedmont Crescent, a corridor of urban development roughly in these systems while non-residential use accounted for 48% following I40 and I85 from Raleigh to Charlotte. and unaccounted-for water use represented 8%. The Yadkin Basin supplies water to some of the Total Water Use in Basin State’s fastest growing areas. LWSP systems expect to supply The USGS’s 1995 summary of water use estimated water to 2,112,020 million persons by the year 2020, a 61% total water use in the basin at 306 million gallons per day increase over 1992 levels. Their demand is projected to (mgd), with almost 80% coming from surface water sources. increase 89%, from 236 mgd to 445 mgd, by 2020. USGS estimated total basin population at 1,251,240. In the 1992 LWSPs, 13 of the 67 systems using water Residential water demand was estimated at 76 mgd with about from this basin reported that available supply was not adequate 70% of this demand being supplied by public water systems. to meet estimated demand through 2002. Overall, public water systems supplied 146 mgd from surface DWR encourages systems to begin planning to water and 6 mgd from ground water for both residential and manage and meet future water demands before average daily non-residential uses. The remaining residential water demand water use reaches 80% of a system’s available supply. Data for was met by 22 mgd of self-supplied ground water. In addition, 1992 indicated that 12 of the 74 LWSP systems in this basin there was about 130 mgd of self-supplied water withdrawn for had an average demand above this threshold. By 2020, 23 non-residential water uses. systems project demand levels that will exceed 80% of their available supply. INTERBASIN TRANSFERS OF SURFACE WATER Self-supplied Use Across the state many water systems move surface The USGS estimated that self-supplied users, water between sub-basins to meet their needs. The table below excluding power generating facilities, accounted for 152 mgd indicates the number of potential interbasin transfers associated of the 306 mgd total of water used from this basin, as shown with this basin. in the table below. Industrial use accounted for 46% of the Potential Interbasin Transfers based on 1992 data self-supplied uses, followed by livestock (21%), irrigation Sub-basin Number mgd OUT mgd IN (17%), domestic (15%), and commercial (1%) uses. Yadkin River 34 13.119 4.279 So. Yadkin 13 1.337 0 USGS Estimated Self-supplied Water Use in mgd Uwharrie R. 6 4.626 0 Sub-basin Domestic Livestock Industrial Commercial Irrigation Total Rocky River 15 2.595 18.96 Yadkin River 13.00 20.94 39.36 0.67 19.31 93.3 The Yadkin basin is one of the most affected basins in So. Yadkin 0.06 3.47 5.49 0.08 2.77 11.9 terms of the number of transfer and the amount of surface water Uwharrie R. ** ** ** ** ** ** transferred. Over 13 mgd of water was transferred out of the Rocky River 9.34 7.29 25.88 0.23 4.43 47.2 Yadkin sub-basin, and nearly 20 mgd of water was transferred Basin Total 22.4 31.7 70.7 1.0 26.5 152.3 into the Rocky River sub-basin in 1992. As water use and ** included in Yadkin River figures transfer amounts increase, some water systems in the basin will eventually need to obtain interbasin transfer certifications. The Registered Water Withdrawals 1997 LWSPs will better document these transfers. Before 1999, anyone withdrawing 1.0 mgd or more of SUMMARY OF INFORMATION FROM 1992LWSPs surface or ground water was required to registered that !Per capita water use in gallons per day: withdrawal with DWR. In this basin there are 44 registered Sub-basin 1992 2010 withdrawals other than LWSP systems or power generating Yadkin River 213 235 facilities, with the cumulative capacity to withdraw 67 mgd. So. Yadkin 212 209 All of these registered withdrawals are for surface water. In Uwharrie R. 114 141 1999, the registration threshold for all water uses except Rocky River 165 196 agriculture was lowered to 100,000 gallons per day. March 1, 2000 is the deadline for registering 1999 withdrawals. !17systems are not connected to another water supply system !28 systems rely on purchase water as their sole supply. WATER AVAILABILITY Surface water is the primary source of water for most !Many plans are not compatible due to discrepancies with of the residents of the basin. LWSPs indicate that 32 water interconnection data. systems in these sub-basins withdraw about 144 mgd of !These systems used 144 mgd of surface water and about only surface water. Seventeen of these systems rely on reservoirs 8 mgd of ground water. for all or part of their water supply. The combined demand on these reservoirs averaged about 71 mgd in 1992. The !The reported raw water supply was 1555 mgd of surface water estimated available supply from these reservoirs, based on the and a 12-hour groundwater supply of 1.4 mgd. 20-year safe yield reported in local water supply plans, is 181 !There 9 county-wide systems. mgd. Nineteen of the surface water systems submitting !18 systems were planning new supplies in the 1992 LWSPs. local water supply plans have run-of-river intakes. These !The systems are projecting significant growth, 61% in intakes supplied about 72 mgd of water in 1992. The available population and 89% in demand, by 2020. supply from these intakes, based on information reported in local water supply plans, is about 1411 mgd. !About 12 mgd of additional water supply will be needed by The abundant surface water supplies in this basin are water systems to ensure that water demands in 2010 do not exceed 80% of available supply (about 4 mgd in the Rocky due in part to the storage and releases from the impoundments River sub-basin and about 8 mgd Yadkin sub-basin). along the Yadkin River. For instance, Winston-Salem has 10,800 million gallons of storage in Kerr Scott Reservoir for !Demand-to-Supply Ratios for 1992 and 2010: use as water supply.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section B: Chapter 9 Yadkin-Pee Dee River Subbasin 03-07-09 Uwharrie River Watershed Including Lake Reese
    Section B: Chapter 9 Yadkin-Pee Dee River Subbasin 03-07-09 Uwharrie River Watershed including Lake Reese 9.1 Water Quality Overview This subbasin is comprised entirely of the Uwharrie River Subbasin 03-07-09 at a Glance watershed. The Uwharrie River begins below High Point in the northwestern portion of Randolph County. It flows Land and Water 2 south through the newly-formed Town of Trinity and Total area: 388 mi continues for several miles on the same southern path Stream miles: 274.8 through Lake Reese and the Uwharrie National Forest in Lake acres: 469.4 Montgomery County before entering the Yadkin-Pee Dee Population Statistics River just below Falls dam. Major tributaries include the 1990 Est. Pop.: 41,702 people Little Uwharrie River, Caraway Creek and Back Creek. Pop. Density: 108 persons/mi2 A map including the locations of NPDES discharges and Land Cover (%) water quality monitoring stations is presented in Figure B- Forest/Wetland: 75.9 Surface Water: 0.7 10. Table B-18 contains a summary of monitoring data Urban: 1.1 types, locations and results. Use support ratings for waters Cultivated Crop: 1.5 in this subbasin are summarized in Table B-19. Appendix Pasture/ I provides a key to discharge identification numbers. Refer Managed Herbaceous: 20.8 to Appendix III for a complete listing of monitored waters and more information about use support ratings. Most of the land is forested (76 percent), but a significant amount is also used for agriculture (22 percent). Only a very small portion is characterized as urban.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Environmental Consequences
    4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES The discussion on environmental consequences summarizes the potential effects on the human, physical, and natural environments that may result from the construction and operation of the Southeast High Speed Rail (SEHSR) project. The existing environment within the project study area was described in Chapter 3. The impacts presented here are based on the proposed preliminary engineering designs for the rail and roadway alignments. Impacts are identified for each of the three alternative alignments within each of the 26 sections of the project. As discussed in Section 2.2, the endpoints of the 26 sections are in locations where the alternative alignments are in a common location. Therefore, alternatives can be evaluated section by section, with a preferred alternative selected for each section. These will be joined together to determine the “best-fit” preferred alternative for the entire study corridor. It should be noted that all persons, business, and non-profit organizations displaced as a result of the project would be compensated in a fair and equitable manner in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS-133-5 through 133-18). 4.1 Water Resources Potential project impacts to streams, wetlands, and other jurisdictional waters are discussed in the following sections, followed by discussion of potential permits required. Clean Water Act Waters of the US, Clean Water Act Permits, Construction Moratoria, Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act regulations, North Carolina River Basin Buffer Rules, and Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters are addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of North Carolina Underwater Archaeology
    i BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH CAROLINA UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY Compiled by Barbara Lynn Brooks, Ann M. Merriman, Madeline P. Spencer, and Mark Wilde-Ramsing Underwater Archaeology Branch North Carolina Division of Archives and History April 2009 ii FOREWARD In the forty-five years since the salvage of the Modern Greece, an event that marks the beginning of underwater archaeology in North Carolina, there has been a steady growth in efforts to document the state’s maritime history through underwater research. Nearly two dozen professionals and technicians are now employed at the North Carolina Underwater Archaeology Branch (N.C. UAB), the North Carolina Maritime Museum (NCMM), the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and East Carolina University’s (ECU) Program in Maritime Studies. Several North Carolina companies are currently involved in conducting underwater archaeological surveys, site assessments, and excavations for environmental review purposes and a number of individuals and groups are conducting ship search and recovery operations under the UAB permit system. The results of these activities can be found in the pages that follow. They contain report references for all projects involving the location and documentation of physical remains pertaining to cultural activities within North Carolina waters. Each reference is organized by the location within which the reported investigation took place. The Bibliography is divided into two geographical sections: Region and Body of Water. The Region section encompasses studies that are non-specific and cover broad areas or areas lying outside the state's three-mile limit, for example Cape Hatteras Area. The Body of Water section contains references organized by defined geographic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Duke Energy Progress Lake Tillery Shoreline Management Plan
    CD-5 APPENDIX CD – 5 Duke Energy Progress Lake Tillery Shoreline Management Plan I-2 Yadkin-Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project No. 2206 Lake Tillery Shoreline Management Plan Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. December 19, 2011 I-3 I-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. v 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Area Description.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Operations and License Requirements ........................................................ 3 1.3 Purpose and Goals ................................................................................................... 3 1.4 History of the Shoreline Management Plan ............................................................. 4 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES .................................................................. 5 2.1 Water Quality ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Aquatic Resources ................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Terrestrial Wildlife Resources ................................................................................. 6 2.4 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species and Special Natural Communities ....... 7 2.5 Nonnative Aquatic Vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT MORT, SANDRA AMISS. Mass Spectrometric Methods for The
    ABSTRACT MORT, SANDRA AMISS. Mass Spectrometric Methods for the Determination of PCB Congeners for Environmental Risk Assessment. (Under the direction of Dr. W. Gregory Cope and Dr. Damian Shea). Our research provides important advances in the evaluation of alternative, cost effective analytical systems for polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) risk assessment of environmental matrices. This type of evaluation has previously been limited by a reluctance on the part of regulators, site owners and investigators, to specify U.S. EPA Method 1668, the 209-PCB congener analysis recommended for environmental media, including biota, water, sediments and soils. U.S. EPA Method 1668 specifies a high-resolution gas chromatography / high- resolution mass spectrometry detection system (HRGC/HRMS) that is of limited availability in both federal and state environmental regulatory agency laboratories, as well as in contract environmental laboratories. This leads to a high cost for 209-PCB congener analysis and a reluctance to require it for environmental risk assessment. While additional validation is needed, this research indicates that low resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LRMSMS) gas chromatography systems provide adequate PCB congener resolution and detection sensitivity to provide robust data for environmental risk assessment of weathered (i.e., degraded) PCB contamination. Our results provide additional support for the need for 209-PCB congener- specific analyses to thoroughly assess the environmental risks associated with abiotic weathered PCB sources, or to define food web component specific PCB burdens and predator, and ultimately, human risks. Based on observations of waterbody, species and trophic guild specific PCB congener profiles in fish collected from four waterbodies of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River system of North Carolina, alternative human health risk assessment methods suggest that some North Carolina sub-populations ingesting fish from the four Yadkin-Pee Dee waterbodies may not be adequately protected from the potential for increased cancer risks by the N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL RIDESHARING DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM: August 1985 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION REPORT 6
    . UMT A-M A-06-0049-85-1 I R.5 . A3 7 no DOT- TSC- UMTA- National Ridesharing 85— 1 7 u.b.uepartment of Transportation Demonstration Program: Urban Mass Transportation Administration Comparative Evaluation Report UMTA Technical Assistance Program NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. , o HE S.ST I 7 ijj nO» p oT- T5C- Technical Report Documontation Pago 7 t. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient' * Catalog No. UMTA-MA- 06-0049-8 5-1 4y Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date NATIONAL RIDESHARING DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM: August 1985 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION REPORT 6. Performing Orgonizotion Code DTS-64 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author^ s) DOT-TSC-UMTA-85- Rosemary, Booth, and Robert Waksman DEPARTMENT OF 1 17 r> - ! v h I r\ : y l n | T /n 9, Performing Orgonizotion Nome and Address TO. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) U.S. Department of Transportation UM527/R5631 25 1985 NOV 1. Research and Special Programs Administr ation' Contract or Grant No. Transportation Systems Center Cambridqe, MA 02142 LIBRARY Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportati on Final Report January 1979-December 1981 Urban Mass Transportation Admini strati n Office of Technical Assistance Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply & Wastewater
    Piedmont Triad Climate Resiliency Tool Kit Water Supply & Wastewater Introduction Water is a scarce natural resource in the Piedmont region. As the Piedmont Triad continues to grow and develop, and the demand for potable water increases, it has become increasingly important to monitor the surface water capacity available to fulfill our regional water demand. Short-term solutions to water issues are generally quick and necessary steps in reaction to immediate concerns. However, a long-term planning approach will better prepare local governments for the unique challenges facing our region. Investment in a deeper understanding of the complex and challenging political, regulatory, and environmental issues surrounding water supply will help guide decision-makers to consider future ramifications of options in resource planning. This assessment of current and future (20-50 years) water resource needs and wastewater treatment plant capacity includes the 12-county Piedmont Triad Regional Council (PTRC) Region (Alamance, Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Montgomery, Randolph, Rockingham, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin Counties). Water supply and wastewater capacity are assessed within the context of surface water availability, projected population growth, geography, current laws and regulations, water quality, and patterns of water use (water conservation and water reuse). Background Drinking water comes from two primary sources, surface water or groundwater. Surface water is the water found above ground in the form of rainwater runoff, streams, rivers, lakes and reservoirs. Groundwater is unseen and deep in the ground saturating porous sandy soils or fractures of bedrock. Surface water and groundwater affect each other. Groundwater comes to the surface (springs) and can help replenish surface water.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Profile with AECOM
    prepared for North Carolina Statewide North Carolina Department of Transportation Multimodal Freight Plan prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Rail Profile with AECOM February 7, 2017 report North Carolina Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan Rail Profile prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 730 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 500 Atlanta, GA 30318 with AECOM 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 date February 7, 2017 North Carolina Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Methods and Data Overview ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Section Organization.................................................................................................................. 1-2 2.0 Inventory ............................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Facilities ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Railroad System ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Stanly County Land Use Plan
    STANLY COUNTY SECTION 1: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STANLY COUNTY LAND USE PLAN Introduction to the Final Report This revision of the Land Use Plan for Stanly County updates the 2002 Land Use Analysis and Development Plan that was prepared for the Board of Commissioners by the County Planning Board and County Planning Department. While the 1977 and 2002 plans provided an adequate planning and infrastructure decision-making tool for county officials and the public, changes in county development patterns necessitate an update. Stanly County and the rest of the Yadkin-Pee Dee Lakes region have a reputation as a place of wonderful natural beauty, from the lakes and rivers of eastern Stanly County, to the “rolling Kansas” district of Millingport, to the Uwharrie Mountains near Morrow Mountain State Park. The steady rise in population over the years verifies Stanly County’s livability and reputation as an excellent place to live, work, and play. The county remains one of the leading agricultural counties in North Carolina. The agricultural economy was for decades augmented by a strong industrial sector based on the textile and aluminum industries, among others. In addition, tourism has emerged as an important industry for the county. Today Stanly County lies at the edge of the growing Charlotte metropolitan region, a region that now extends into Cabarrus and Union Counties, both of which share Stanly County’s western border. While indications are already apparent that parts of western Stanly County are experiencing increased development activity, it is expected that major infrastructure projects— among them the completion of the eastern leg of the Interstate 485 Charlotte by-pass, and the widening of NC 24/27 to four lanes from the county line to Albemarle—will speed the rate of development and growth in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Badin Lake Sediment Remedial Action Plan
    Alcoa Corrective Action Badin, North Carolina Corrective Action Activities Alcoa began operations at the Badin site in 1915 as a primary aluminum smelter. Principal products manufactured at the plant include carbon cathodes and anodes, continuous cast sheets and specialty metals. Alcoa reduced aluminum smelting operations at the Badin facility in 2002 and ceased operation in 2007. The Alcoa plant site is approximately 123 acres in size. The site contains industrial buildings and structures, parking lots, and areas covered with vegetation. Alcoa owns land that extends to Badin Lake, however the industrial plant property extends only to Highway 740 and does not abut the lake. Alcoa was issued a Hazardous Waste Management Permit to store spent potlining on March 30, 1992 and the permit was renewed on March 24, 2006. The Hazardous Waste Management Permit required Alcoa to identify and investigate solid waste management units for potential adverse impact to the environmental media at the Badin facility. A solid waste management unit is any discernible waste management unit at a RCRA facility which has been used for the treatment, storage, or disposal of solid waste at any time, irrespective of whether the unit is or ever was intended for management of solid waste. The contamination at the site is predominantly inorganic compounds (cyanide and fluoride) from the production of aluminum. Low concentrations of organic constituents (mainly polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PCB aroclors, and trichloroethene) are found in localized areas of the plant site associated with a limited number of solid waste management units. Interim measures were conducted from 1996 to 2012 on eight solid waste management units at the site to minimize the threat of further environmental releases from those units.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael L. West, PGA Independence Golf Club, Midlothian, Virginia Mike
    Michael L. West, PGA Independence Golf Club, Midlothian, Virginia Mike was born June 24, 1960 in Burlington, North Carolina to Jack and Elsie West. He has one brother, David. Both of Mike’s parents and both of his grandfathers played golf. His father introduced him to the game at Shamrock Golf Club in Burlington when Mike was three years old. Mike later played at Piedmont Crescent, now Quarry Hills Country Club, in Graham, North Carolina. Mike’s father, Jack, along with Shamrock Golf Club’s Head PGA Professional Steve Walker, had a tremendous influence on Mike’s game at an early age. Father and son played numerous rounds together with Mike’s fondest memory being that of going to Pinehurst to play course #2 on Saturday mornings. Steve Walker had played collegiate golf at Wake Forest in the late 1960s and became like a big brother and mentor who introduced Mike to Wake Forest players such as Lanny Wadkins, Joe Inman, Jim Simmons, and Jack Lewis. Mike worked in the golf shop and on the outside at Piedmont Crescent while in high school. He picked the range in exchange for hitting practice balls. Mike graduated from the University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill) with a degree in Business Administration. He played collegiate golf from 1978-1982, and won the 1980 Eastern Amateur, the 1982 North Carolina Amateur, and the 1982 Carolinas Amateur. Mike declared his professional status in 1983 and played in many PGA Tour and mini- tour events until 1988. He worked from 1989 to 1992 at Farmington Country Club in Charlottesville, Virginia for PGA Professional Bobby McIver and was elected to PGA membership while there in October of 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • 2040 Statewide Transportation Plan Challenges & Opportunities
    CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES SEPTEMBER 2011 Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... ES‐i 1 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Planning Framework .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Study Goals ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Report Organization ............................................................................................................... 4 2 North Carolina Transformation Reform Process (Policy to Projects) .................................................. 5 2.1 North Carolina Multimodal Investment Network .................................................................. 5 2.2 Level of Service and Investment Categories .......................................................................... 6 2.3 Organizational Performance Dashboard ................................................................................ 7 3 North Carolina Transportation System: A Snapshot ........................................................................... 9 3.1 Highways ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]