Matrix Attachment Regions and Structural Colinearity in the Genomes of Two Grass Species Zoya Avramova1,*, Alexander Tikhonov1, Mingsheng Chen2 and Jeffrey L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Matrix Attachment Regions and Structural Colinearity in the Genomes of Two Grass Species Zoya Avramova1,*, Alexander Tikhonov1, Mingsheng Chen2 and Jeffrey L 1998 Oxford University Press Nucleic Acids Research, 1998, Vol. 26, No. 3 761–767 Matrix attachment regions and structural colinearity in the genomes of two grass species Zoya Avramova1,*, Alexander Tikhonov1, Mingsheng Chen2 and Jeffrey L. Bennetzen1,2 1Department of Biological Sciences and 2Purdue Genetics Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Received October 14, 1997; Revised and Accepted December 4, 1997 ABSTRACT Besides being structural elements, therefore, MARs are believed to bear functional information as well. In order to gain insights into the relationship between For obvious reasons researchers have focused mainly on the spatial organization of the genome and genome gene-containing fraction of the genome. Hence, most of the function we have initiated studies of the co-linear existing information on the structural organization of the genome Sh2/A1-homologous regions of rice (30 kb) and describes individual genes and their immediate surroundings. sorghum (50 kb). We have identified the locations of Information on domain organization and chromosome folding at matrix attachment regions (MARs) in these homologous a supragenic level in animal systems is limited to only a few chromosome segments, which could serve as anchors studies: a 320 kb continuum of the Drosophila rosy–Ace locus for individual structural units or loops. Despite the fact (13), an 800 kb region of Drosophila chromosome 1 (14,15), the that the nucleotide sequences serving as MARs were 240 kb amplicon of the chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase not detectably conserved, the general organizational gene (16) and 200 kb around the mouse heavy chain IgH locus patterns of MARs relative to the neighboring genes (17). The first study in plants devoted to the higher order were preserved. All identified genes were placed in structural organization of a large chromosomal continuum was individual loops that were of comparable size for focused on a 290 kb region around maize Adh1 (18). The location homologous genes. Hence, gene composition, gene of MARs along this chromosomal segment defined several loops orientation, gene order and the placement of genes of various sizes and a strong, although not perfect, correlation into structural units has been evolutionarily conserved between MAR locations and the junctions of repetitive and low in this region. Our analysis demonstrated that the copy number DNA blocks. The distribution of the different occurrence of various ‘MAR motifs’ is not indicative of classes of DNA within this continuum (19) with respect to the MAR location. However, most of the MARs discovered structural loops revealed that the long stretches of mixed classes in the two genomic regions were found to co-localize of highly repetitive DNAs are segregated into topologically with miniature inverted repeat transposable elements sequestered units (18). It was interesting, therefore, to study the (MITEs), suggesting that MITEs preferentially insert possible loop folding of grass genomic regions void of highly near MARs and/or that they can serve as MARs. repetitive DNA blocks in their intergenic space, as is the case for the Sh2/A1-homologous regions of sorghum and rice (20–22). Earlier we showed that the Adh1 gene was positioned in an INTRODUCTION individual loop (18). However, lack of information regarding the presence and location of other genes in the region did not allow The higher level structural organization of the genome is believed us at that time to pursue a possible correlation between the to be important both for compaction of chromosomes in the structural organization of genes and their function. We have nucleus and for regulating genome functions. According to the addressed this question here by examining the putative higher chromatin domain model (1–3) the genome is folded into level structural organization of two large genomic continuums of structural domains (loops), the bases of which are attached to a known gene composition. This is the first attempt to compare the proteinaceous nuclear skeleton (matrix). Such loops are believed possible spatial organization of homologous genomic regions in to provide an additional 1000-fold compaction of the genome, two different species. necessary for its accommodation into the interphase nucleus. The A characteristic feature of eukaryotic genomes is the enormous DNA sequences (matrix attachment regions, or MARs) variation in genome size, which bears little relation to differences in anchoring loops of heterogeneous size to this matrix are organism complexity or to the number of genes that code for proteins considered to be important structural elements of the genome. (23). Much of this variation is due to differences in the amount of Their ability to affect gene expression has been shown (3–6). In repetitive DNA. Recombinational mapping of different grass plants MARs have been reported to play a role in reducing both genomes has indicated extensive conservation of both gene content position effects and homology-dependent gene silencing (7–12). and gene map order (24,25), despite great variation in genome size *To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel: +1 765 494 9837; Fax: +1 765 496 1496; Email: [email protected] 762 Nucleic Acids Research, 1998, Vol. 26, No. 3 Figure 1. Maps of the Sh2/A1-homologous regions of rice and sorghum. (A) The black horizontal arrows indicate the location of the Sh2, X and A1 homologs on the rice contig. The four overlapping clones covering 30 kb of the rice region are shown above. The sites for the restriction enzymes used in the screening are shown: X, XhoI; S, SacI; RI, EcoRI; M, MluI; Hp, HpaI; H, HindIII. The small black head-to-head triangles illustrate the MITEs identified in the region: T, tourist; St, stowaway; W, wanderer; E, explorer; Sn, snabo (20). The two arrowheads upstream of the A1 homolog show the size and location of a pair of direct repeats, while the vertical empty triangle marks the position of simple sequence repeats (20). The restriction fragments binding to the matrix are shown as open boxes with a star under the bar. The numbers flanking the boxes correspond to the map positions of the restriction cuts generating the respective fragment. The location of the 1.1 kb MAR inside the larger 4.8 kb BamHI–XhoI MAR, 3′ of gene X, is shown as a box inside a larger box. The putative loops and their lengths are shown at the lower level. The distribution patterns of A/T are shown in the boxed area on the same scale as the restriction map above. (B) Five adjacent clones covering 50 kb of the colinear Sh2/A1 region of sorghum are shown on top. Small vertical bars show the BamHI sites used for their subcloning. The restriction enzymes used in the analysis are: B, BamHI; K, KpnI; P, PacI; X, XhoI; RV, EcoRV; RI, EcoRI; H, HindIII. S-1–S-5 are putative new MITEs defined through their ability to form snap-back structures and/or because they were found around other genes in the databases (22; A.Tikhonov, unpublished results). The solo LTR between the two duplicated A1 homologs is shown as a double-headed light arrow. All other designations are as in (A). and chromosome number (26). Recent studies have shown that previously (20,21; Fig. 1). Restriction enzymes and T4 poly- interspecies gene content and order have often been preserved nucleotide kinase were from New England Biolabs. Calf intestine also at the 200–500 kb level (20–22,27–29). alkaline phosphatase (Pharmacia) was used for dephosphorylation. With this background we have asked three questions. What will be the potential of large chromosomal regions of known sequence Nuclear and matrix preparations composition to fold into individual structural units? Given the micro-colinearity of grass genomes, will the folding of colinear Leaves from 3-week-old rice (variety Teqing) and sorghum × regions into structural units follow a similar pattern? Will there be (cultivar BT 623) seedlings were used for isolation of nuclei. DNA sequence motifs that are common and/or conserved in plant Excised leaves were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and MARs? finely ground in a mortar. Nuclear isolation was according to the About 50 and 30 kb of sorghum and rice DNA respectively, protocol established previously (30). Aliquots containing 3–5 containing A1/Sh2-homologous regions, were screened for the A260 units of nuclei were dispersed in 50 mM Tris, 0.1 M NaCl, location and distribution of MARs as anchors for the bases of 5 mM MgCl2 buffer,_ pH 7.2, in 70% glycerol and stored for putative loops (domains). Several MAR-containing fragments (four several months at –80 C. Nuclear matrices were prepared by the in rice and seven in sorghum) were isolated and their sequences high salt extraction procedure, as described (30). compared with each other and with reported characteristics of animal MARs. The results indicated significant preservation of MAR binding experiments structural organization but no detected conservation of sequences or Each of the subclones was digested with a combination of restriction motifs responsible for folding of this region. enzymes as shown in the legend to Figure 2. The fragments resulting from restriction were dephosphorylated and end-labeled with MATERIALS AND METHODS [γ-32P]ATP (Amersham) in One-Phore All Buffer PLUS Materials (Pharmacia). The in vitro binding method was used to screen the rice and sorghum clones for the presence of MARs, essentially as Subclones of rice and sorghum bacterial artificial chromosomes described previously (30). In pilot experiments the amount of (BACs) containing Sh2 and A1 homologs have been described nuclear matrices and competitor DNA were established with the 763 Nucleic AcidsAcids Research,Research, 1994, 1998, Vol. Vol. 22, 26, No. No. 1 3 763 purpose of carrying out the binding assays under reproducible conditions and to eliminate weak and background associations.
Recommended publications
  • Inherited Neuropathies
    407 Inherited Neuropathies Vera Fridman, MD1 M. M. Reilly, MD, FRCP, FRCPI2 1 Department of Neurology, Neuromuscular Diagnostic Center, Address for correspondence Vera Fridman, MD, Neuromuscular Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Diagnostic Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, 2 MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology Massachusetts, 165 Cambridge St. Boston, MA 02114 and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen (e-mail: [email protected]). Square, London, United Kingdom Semin Neurol 2015;35:407–423. Abstract Hereditary neuropathies (HNs) are among the most common inherited neurologic Keywords disorders and are diverse both clinically and genetically. Recent genetic advances have ► hereditary contributed to a rapid expansion of identifiable causes of HN and have broadened the neuropathy phenotypic spectrum associated with many of the causative mutations. The underlying ► Charcot-Marie-Tooth molecular pathways of disease have also been better delineated, leading to the promise disease for potential treatments. This chapter reviews the clinical and biological aspects of the ► hereditary sensory common causes of HN and addresses the challenges of approaching the diagnostic and motor workup of these conditions in a rapidly evolving genetic landscape. neuropathy ► hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy Hereditary neuropathies (HN) are among the most common Select forms of HN also involve cranial nerves and respiratory inherited neurologic diseases, with a prevalence of 1 in 2,500 function. Nevertheless, in the majority of patients with HN individuals.1,2 They encompass a clinically heterogeneous set there is no shortening of life expectancy. of disorders and vary greatly in severity, spanning a spectrum Historically, hereditary neuropathies have been classified from mildly symptomatic forms to those resulting in severe based on the primary site of nerve pathology (myelin vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Drosophila Models of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Recent Advances in Drosophila Models of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Fukiko Kitani-Morii 1,2,* and Yu-ichi Noto 2 1 Department of Molecular Pathobiology of Brain Disease, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan 2 Department of Neurology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-75-251-5793 Received: 31 August 2020; Accepted: 6 October 2020; Published: 8 October 2020 Abstract: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is one of the most common inherited peripheral neuropathies. CMT patients typically show slowly progressive muscle weakness and sensory loss in a distal dominant pattern in childhood. The diagnosis of CMT is based on clinical symptoms, electrophysiological examinations, and genetic testing. Advances in genetic testing technology have revealed the genetic heterogeneity of CMT; more than 100 genes containing the disease causative mutations have been identified. Because a single genetic alteration in CMT leads to progressive neurodegeneration, studies of CMT patients and their respective models revealed the genotype-phenotype relationships of targeted genes. Conventionally, rodents and cell lines have often been used to study the pathogenesis of CMT. Recently, Drosophila has also attracted attention as a CMT model. In this review, we outline the clinical characteristics of CMT, describe the advantages and disadvantages of using Drosophila in CMT studies, and introduce recent advances in CMT research that successfully applied the use of Drosophila, in areas such as molecules associated with mitochondria, endosomes/lysosomes, transfer RNA, axonal transport, and glucose metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbit Anti-Human MARS Polyclonal Antibody (CABT-L2255) This Product Is for Research Use Only and Is Not Intended for Diagnostic Use
    Rabbit Anti-Human MARS Polyclonal Antibody (CABT-L2255) This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic use. PRODUCT INFORMATION Product Overview Polyclonal Antibody to Methionyl tRNA Synthetase (Knockout Validated) Specificity The antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against MARS. It has been selected for its ability to recognize MARS in immunohistochemical staining and western blotting. Target MARS Immunogen Recombinant fragment corresponding to human MARS (Gly74~Pro212) Isotype IgG Source/Host Rabbit Species Reactivity Human, Mouse Purification Antigen-specific affinity chromatography followed by Protein A affinity chromatography Conjugate Unconjugated Applications WB Format Liquid Concentration Lot specific Size 200 μg Buffer Supplied as solution form in 0.01M PBS with 50% glycerol, pH7.4. Preservative 0.05% Proclin-300 Storage Avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles. Store at 4°C for frequent use. Aliquot and store at -20°C for 12 months. Ship 4°C with ice bags Warnings For research use only. BACKGROUND 45-1 Ramsey Road, Shirley, NY 11967, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: 1-631-624-4882 Fax: 1-631-938-8221 1 © Creative Diagnostics All Rights Reserved Introduction This gene encodes a member of the class I family of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. These enzymes play a critical role in protein biosynthesis by charging tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded protein is a component of the multi-tRNA synthetase complex and catalyzes the ligation of methionine to tRNA molecules. [provided
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Regulation of the P53-Homolog P73 in the Transformation of Normal Human Fibroblasts
    Role and regulation of the p53-homolog p73 in the transformation of normal human fibroblasts Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Lars Hofmann aus Aschaffenburg Würzburg 2007 Eingereicht am Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Dr. Martin J. Müller Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael P. Schön Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Georg Krohne Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbständig angefertigt und keine anderen als die angegebenen Hilfsmittel und Quellen verwendet habe. Diese Arbeit wurde weder in gleicher noch in ähnlicher Form in einem anderen Prüfungsverfahren vorgelegt. Ich habe früher, außer den mit dem Zulassungsgesuch urkundlichen Graden, keine weiteren akademischen Grade erworben und zu erwerben gesucht. Würzburg, Lars Hofmann Content SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ IV ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ............................................................................................. V 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Molecular basics of cancer .......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Early research on tumorigenesis ................................................................................. 3 1.3. Developing
    [Show full text]
  • Aminoacyl-Trna Synthetase Deficiencies in Search of Common Themes
    © American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics ARTICLE Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase deficiencies in search of common themes Sabine A. Fuchs, MD, PhD1, Imre F. Schene, MD1, Gautam Kok, BSc1, Jurriaan M. Jansen, MSc1, Peter G. J. Nikkels, MD, PhD2, Koen L. I. van Gassen, PhD3, Suzanne W. J. Terheggen-Lagro, MD, PhD4, Saskia N. van der Crabben, MD, PhD5, Sanne E. Hoeks, MD6, Laetitia E. M. Niers, MD, PhD7, Nicole I. Wolf, MD, PhD8, Maaike C. de Vries, MD9, David A. Koolen, MD, PhD10, Roderick H. J. Houwen, MD, PhD11, Margot F. Mulder, MD, PhD12 and Peter M. van Hasselt, MD, PhD1 Purpose: Pathogenic variations in genes encoding aminoacyl- with unreported compound heterozygous pathogenic variations in tRNA synthetases (ARSs) are increasingly associated with human IARS, LARS, KARS, and QARS extended the common phenotype disease. Clinical features of autosomal recessive ARS deficiencies with lung disease, hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and renal tubulo- appear very diverse and without apparent logic. We searched for pathy. common clinical patterns to improve disease recognition, insight Conclusion: We propose a common clinical phenotype for recessive into pathophysiology, and clinical care. ARS deficiencies, resulting from insufficient aminoacylation activity Methods: Symptoms were analyzed in all patients with recessive to meet translational demand in specific organs or periods of life. ARS deficiencies reported in literature, supplemented with Assuming residual ARS activity, adequate protein/amino acid supply unreported patients evaluated in our hospital. seems essential instead of the traditional replacement of protein by Results: In literature, we identified 107 patients with AARS, glucose in patients with metabolic diseases. DARS, GARS, HARS, IARS, KARS, LARS, MARS, RARS, SARS, VARS, YARS, and QARS deficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Method of Genomic Array Analysis of Scaffold
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Methods A Rapid Method of Genomic Array Analysis of Scaffold/Matrix Attachment Regions (S/MARs) Identifies a 2.5-MbRegion of Enhanced Scaffold/Matrix Attachment at a Human Neocentromere Huseyin Sumer, Jeffrey M. Craig, Mandy Sibson, and K.H. Andy Choo1 Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia Human neocentromeres are fully functional centromeres that arise at previously noncentromeric regions of the genome. We have tested a rapid procedure of genomic array analysis of chromosome scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs), involving the isolation of S/MAR DNA and hybridization of this DNA to a genomic BAC/PAC array. Using this procedure, we have defined a 2.5-Mbdoma in of S/MAR-enriched chromatin that fully encompasses a previously mapped centromere protein-A (CENP-A)-associated domain at a human neocentromere. We have independently verified this procedure using a previously established fluorescence in situ hybridization method on salt-treated metaphase chromosomes. In silico sequence analysis of the S/MAR-enriched and surrounding regions has revealed no outstanding sequence-related predisposition. This study defines the S/MAR-enriched domain of a higher eukaryotic centromere and provides a method that has broad application for the mapping of S/MAR attachment sites over large genomic regions or throughout a genome. [Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.] The centromere is a specialized structure of the eukaryotic ferred to as a chromosome scaffold or matrix, and the DNA chromosome responsible for the accurate partitioning of sis- sequences that mediate attachment are termed scaffold/ ter-chromatids during mitosis and meiosis.
    [Show full text]
  • MARS: Motif Assessment and Ranking Suite for Transcription Factor Binding Motifs
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/065615; this version posted November 14, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. MARS: Motif Assessment and Ranking Suite for transcription factor binding motifs Caleb Kipkurui Kibet* and Philip Machanick Department of Computer Science and Research Unit in Bioinformatics (RUBi), Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa * [email protected] Abstract We describe MARS (Motif Assessment and Ranking Suite), a web-based suite of tools used to evaluate and rank PWM-based motifs. The increased number of learned motif models that are spread across databases and in different PWM formats, leading to a choice dilemma among the users, is our motivation. This increase has been driven by the difficulty of modelling transcription factor binding sites and the advance in high-throughput sequencing technologies at a continually reducing cost. Therefore, several experimental techniques have been developed resulting in diverse motif-finding algorithms and databases. We collate a wide variety of available motifs into a benchmark database, including the corresponding experimental ChIP-seq and PBM data obtained from ENCODE and UniPROBE databases, respectively. The implemented tools include: a data-independent consistency-based motif assessment and ranking (CB-MAR), which is based on the idea that `correct motifs' are more similar to each other while incorrect motifs will differ from each other; and a scoring and classification-based algorithms, which rank binding models by their ability to discriminate sequences known to contain binding sites from those without.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed in (104)]
    The Role in Translation of Editing and Multi-Synthetase Complex Formation by Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Medha Vijay Raina, M.Sc. Ohio State Biochemistry Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michael Ibba, Advisor Dr. Juan Alfonzo Dr. Irina Artsimovitch Dr. Kurt Fredrick Dr. Karin Musier-Forsyth Copyright by Medha Vijay Raina 2014 ABSTRACT Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) catalyze the first step of translation, aminoacylation. These enzymes attach amino acids (aa) to their cognate tRNAs to form aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA), an important substrate in protein synthesis, which is delivered to the ribosome as a ternary complex with translation elongation factor 1A (EF1A) and GTP. All aaRSs have an aminoacylation domain, which is the active site that recognizes the specific amino acid, ATP, and the 3′ end of the bound tRNA to catalyze the aminoacylation reaction. Apart from the aminoacylation domain, some aaRSs have evolved additional domains that are involved in interacting with other proteins, recognizing and binding the tRNA anticodon, and editing misacylated tRNA thereby expanding their role in and beyond translation. One such function of the aaRS is to form a variety of complexes with each other and with other factors by interacting via additional N or C terminal extensions. For example, several archaeal and eukaryotic aaRSs are known to associate with EF1A or other aaRSs forming higher order complexes, although the role of these multi-synthetase complexes (MSC) in translation remains largely unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Caenorhabditis Elegans As a Model to Determine the Molecular Effects of Plausible Environmental Risk Factors of Breast Cancer
    CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS AS A MODEL TO DETERMINE THE MOLECULAR EFFECTS OF PLAUSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS OF BREAST CANCER by Elizabeth Romano A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Environmental Science and Public Policy Committee: ___________________________________ Dr. Ancha Baranova, Dissertation Director ___________________________________ Dr. Aybike Birerdinc, Committee Member ___________________________________ Dr. Cara Frankenfeld, Committee Member ___________________________________ Dr. E. Christien Parsons, Committee Member ___________________________________ Dr. Albert P. Torzilli, Graduate Program Director ___________________________________ Dr. A. Alonso Aguirre, Department Chairperson ___________________________________ Dr. Donna Fox, Associate Dean, Student Affairs & Special Programs, College of Science ___________________________________ Dr. Peggy Agouris, Dean, College of Science Date: ______________________________ Fall 2017 George Mason University Fairfax, VA CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS AS A MODEL TO DETERMINE THE MOLECULAR EFFECTS OF PLAUSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS OF BREAST CANCER A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Elizabeth Romano Master of Science George Mason University, 2010 Bachelor of Science George Mason University, 2008 Director: Ancha Baranova, Professor School of Systems Biology Fall Semester 2017 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright 2017 Elizabeth Romano All Rights Reserved iii DEDICATION This is dedicated to family. For my dog who kept me (mostly) active when I just wanted to sit and work. For my husband who surprised me with treats when I was crunched for time and pushed me to “get it done.” For my mother who always watched my children when I needed to buckle down and provided a listening ear for my frustrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Aminoacyl-Trna Synthetases
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases MIGUEL ANGEL RUBIO GOMEZ and MICHAEL IBBA Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA ABSTRACT The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are an essential and universally distributed family of enzymes that plays a critical role in protein synthesis, pairing tRNAs with their cognate amino acids for decoding mRNAs according to the genetic code. Synthetases help to ensure accurate translation of the genetic code by using both highly accurate cognate substrate rec- ognition and stringent proofreading of noncognate products. While alterations in the quality control mechanisms of syn- thetases are generally detrimental to cellular viability, recent studies suggest that in some instances such changes facilitate adaption to stress conditions. Beyond their central role in translation, synthetases are also emerging as key players in an increasing number of other cellular processes, with far-reaching consequences in health and disease. The biochemical ver- satility of the synthetases has also proven pivotal in efforts to expand the genetic code, further emphasizing the wide-rang- ing roles of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family in synthetic and natural biology. Keywords: aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases; tRNA; protein translation THE AMINOACYL-tRNA SYNTHETASES charges tRNAMet with methionine. In eukaryotes, an alter- native nomenclature is often used using the one-letter Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are universally dis- code of the amino acid (MARS) and a number is added tributed enzymes that catalyze the esterification of a to refer to the cytosolic (MARS1) or the mitochondrial tRNA to its cognate amino acid (i.e., the amino acid corre- (MARS2) variants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lncrna MARS Modulates the Epigenetic Reprogramming of The
    The lncRNA MARS modulates the epigenetic reprogramming of the marneral cluster in response to ABA Thomas Roulé, Federico Ariel, Caroline Hartmann, Jose Gutierrez-Marcos, Nosheen Hussain, Martin Crespi, Thomas Blein To cite this version: Thomas Roulé, Federico Ariel, Caroline Hartmann, Jose Gutierrez-Marcos, Nosheen Hussain, et al.. The lncRNA MARS modulates the epigenetic reprogramming of the marneral cluster in response to ABA. 2020. hal-03016338 HAL Id: hal-03016338 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03016338 Preprint submitted on 20 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.10.236562; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 The lncRNA MARS modulates the epigenetic reprogramming of the marneral 2 cluster in response to ABA 3 Thomas Roulé1,2, Federico Ariel3, Caroline Hartmann1,2, Jose Gutierrez-Marcos4, Nosheen 4 Hussain4,
    [Show full text]
  • Pdbe: Protein Data Bank in Europe S
    D308–D317 Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, Database issue Published online 25 October 2009 doi:10.1093/nar/gkp916 PDBe: Protein Data Bank in Europe S. Velankar*, C. Best, B. Beuth, C. H. Boutselakis, N. Cobley, A. W. Sousa Da Silva, D. Dimitropoulos, A. Golovin, M. Hirshberg, M. John, E. B. Krissinel, R. Newman, T. Oldfield, A. Pajon, C. J. Penkett, J. Pineda-Castillo, G. Sahni, S. Sen, R. Slowley, A. Suarez-Uruena, J. Swaminathan, G. van Ginkel, W. F. Vranken, K. Henrick and G. J. Kleywegt* Protein Databank in Europe, EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK Received September 15, 2009; Accepted October 7, 2009 ABSTRACT MSD (1)], the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) (2) and the BioMagResBank The Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe) (http://www (BMRB) (3) in the USA, and the Protein Data Bank .ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/) is actively working with its Japan (PDBj), collectively form the Worldwide Protein Worldwide Protein Data Bank partners to enhance Data Bank (wwPDB) (4) organization. wwPDB is respon- the quality and consistency of the international sible for maintaining the single worldwide repository of archive of bio-macromolecular structure data, bio-macromolecular structure data, the Protein Data the Protein Data Bank (PDB). PDBe also works Bank (PDB) (5,6). To ensure that the core archive data closely with its collaborators at the European are represented uniformly at all the wwPDB sites, there Bioinformatics Institute and the scientific community is an active collaboration involving exchange of the core around the world to enhance its databases and reference information (e.g.
    [Show full text]