DOCSLIB.ORG

EURASLIC 14 Proceedings.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EURASLIC 14 Proceedings.Pdf 1 14th Biennial Meeting of the European Association of Aquatic Science Libraries and Information Centres 28ème conférence annuelle OMER EURASLIC PROCEEDINGS CAUGHT IN THE "FISHING NET" OF INFORMATION 17-20 May 2011 Fort de Vaise 25 Boulevard de Saint Exupery Lyon, France 1 Conference committee Achard, Anne-Laure Baligand, Marie-Pascale Confesson, Yves Jannes-Ober, Emmanuelle Tilghman-Sibille, Ashley EURASLIC Board President : Barbara SCHMIDT Vice-President : Marie-Pascale BALIGAND Member representative 1 : Marina MAYER Member representative 2 : Jan HASPESLAGH Executive Secretary and Newsletter Editor : Snejina BACHEVA Coopted non-voting member : Bart GOOSSENS Coopted non-voting member : Sofija KONJEVIC Coopted non-voting member : Margaret GRABOWSKA-POPOW Coopted non-voting member : Olga AKIMOVA Coopted non-voting member : Margaret WATTS-DIMAS 2 GROUP PHOTO , E URASLIC 14, L YON 3 Table of Contents Sharing a bibliographic database in research teams on web interface : A study of collaborative reference management tools ....................................................................... 6 Colette Cadiou et Sylvie Sarah-Blin.................................................................................................... 6 Bibliometrics: a new feature for institutional repositories..............................................10 Fred Merceur, Morgane Le Gall et Annick Salaün........................................................................... 10 An inter-agency documentary policy on water and aquatic environment......................34 Françoise Bunch................................................................................................................................ 34 Sharing freshwater data in the UK - Opportunities and challenges................................43 Hardy Schwamm................................................................................................................................ 43 The IODE Anniversary Bibliography: 50 years of activities ............................................47 Maria Kalenchits............................................................................................................................... 47 Opening access to European funded publications (FP7 and ERC): The OpenAIRE [email protected] .....................................................................54 Alexandra Deniot .............................................................................................................................. 54 Virtual Open Access Agriculture & Aquaculture Repository: sharing scientific and scholarly research related to agriculture, food, and environment (http://voa3r.eu) ......58 Marc Goovaerts................................................................................................................................. 58 Citation analysis as tool for collection use and management at the library of a research institute ...............................................................................................................59 Bart Goossens.................................................................................................................................... 59 Search Engine Optimization of a Forest Fragmentation Content Management System: Example of the Fragfornet Website...................................................................................66 Aurélie Gandour and Amanda Regolini............................................................................................ 66 How non-mainstream published books find their way into libraries ..............................72 Anneli Meeder ................................................................................................................................... 72 As time goes by... a reader caught in the information net. The library of the Sea Fisheries Institute in Gdynia, Poland as seen by its users on the 90th anniversary of its founding..............................................................................................................................73 Magprzata Grabowska Popow.......................................................................................................... 73 4 The Library at the Fish Resources Research Department of the Institute „BIOR” in Latvia – history, collection, and nowadays opportunities in „catching” of information .............................................................................................................................................85 Natalya Kondratyeva......................................................................................................................... 85 Euraslic ECET Group Activities.........................................................................................90 Olga Akimova.................................................................................................................................... 90 GLOBAL SEARCH SYSTEMS AS THE TOOL FOR THE MARINE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................................................90 Liudmila Kulagina............................................................................................................................. 90 Posters..............................................................................................................................101 Institute of oceanography and fisheries library report : marketing the value of the library ................................................................................................................................101 Ingrid Catic ..................................................................................................................................... 101 Co-authored papers: an analysis ....................................................................................102 Emilie Gentilini, Amanda Regolini.................................................................................................. 102 Librarian in the information stream ................................................................................102 Irina Inyaeva ................................................................................................................................... 102 Interlibrary Loan at Ru ñer Boškovi ć Institute Library, Croatia, 2009-2010...................103 Sofija Konjevi ć ................................................................................................................................ 103 RBI Library New Web .......................................................................................................103 Marina Mayer.................................................................................................................................. 103 Attendees List...................................................................................................................104 5 SHARING A BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE IN RESEARCH TEAMS ON WEB INTERFACE : A STUDY OF COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE MANAGEMENT TOOLS Colette Cadiou et Sylvie Sarah-Blin Cemagref, Clermont-Ferrand, France Cemagref, Maison de la Télédétection, Montpellier, France [email protected], [email protected] Context and Objectives In our research organization most researchers use reference management software to retrieve their selection of documents from databases or reading, and to edit bibliographic lists with citations. Here EndNote is the most popular ( national acquisition) , JabRef/BibteX and most recent tools like Zotero or Mendeley are also used. Generally these software are devoted to personal use, some researchers’ teams share a EndNote library in spite of its inconveniences : no web access, no group management, need for a coordinator. Other collaborative tools like Wikindx or Php developments have been used but have been abandoned. In 2010 some researchers have expressed to librarians their needs for sharing bibliography : The main criteria which are common to all groups or applications : • Secure storage space ( internal if possible) • Open source/ free solution • Expots/imports : RIS, BibteX, RDF etc to enable different software uses • Web access • Ergonomics • PDF loading (for papers respecting copyright ) • Customizing the access to data : list of common tags, email alerts or RSS, origin of data Test of tools Literature and Internet forums have shown different tools , but it is difficult to find the ideal solution. We have examined different kinds of tools: • Reference management tools with web access sharing : 6 o EndNote web : collective use limited, you cannot add a Word text or PDF to your reference. o Zotero : no possibility to share one subcollection but the entire library of a user. The limit of 500 Mo free of charge on a zotero server is an inconvenient, but the test on a WebDav internal server was disappointing. Further tests could be done according further developments within the Zotero community. o Mendeley : the new “Outsider”, which becomes more and more popular among researchers because of its ergonomics and social network philosophy ( like Zotero), but you have to pay to store more than 500 Mo, and the number of persons to share one library is limited to 10 persons, which is usually more important. o CiteUlike : this application existing since 2004 has been improved with PDF management, and not only URL sharing. But all is stored on a external server , without customization possibilities. o Wizfolio : its ergonomics is attractive,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Free Download Jabref Software
    Free download jabref software Download JabRef for free. Download via . Te best BibTex manager and Bibliography software for all platforms! The native file format used by JabRef is BibTeX, the standard LaTeX JabRef can be instructed to search for the full text of a reference, download it, and directly ​JabRef · ​JabRef | Blog · ​JabRef Help · ​Master. Fast downloads of the latest free software!*** JabRef is an open source graphical bibliography reference manager. The application can. Download JabRef - open source bibliography reference manager. This software has many other features and is probably the best free bibliography reference. JabRef is an open source bibliography reference manager The native file format All informations about programs or games on this website have been found in. Free Download. ( MB) Safe & Secure. Share with Friends?Share. Browse Software JabRef bit is an open source bibliography reference manager. The native file format Download JabRef (bit) Latest Version. JabRef free download. Get the Download Now! Downloads Total: | Last week: 5 Ranking #20 in Java Software Publisher Morten Alver. Download JabRef for free. JabRef is Total downloads:1, (2 last week) The most popular versions of the software are , and Software Informer. Log in / Sign up JabRef is an open-source bibliography reference manager. JabRef is DOWNLOAD Free MB. JabRef is a graphical application for managing bibliographical databases. JabRef is designed specifically for BibTeX bases, but can import and. The Software can be downloaded for free on the Internet, in particular at other programs such as, for instance, Freeplane (GPL 2 or later), JabRef (GPL 2) and. Download the latest version of JabRef free.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Management Software Comparison - 6Th Update (June 2016)
    Universitätsbibliothek Technische Universität München Reference Management Software Comparison - 6th Update (June 2016) This document and its content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 1 / 19 Universitätsbibliothek Technische Universität München Reference Management Software Comparison Compiled by: Dörte Böhner (FIZBw Bonn), Thomas Stöber (LMU München) and Astrid Teichert (LMU München) July 2009. Updated by Dorothea Lemke (TUB München; Citavi & EndNote), Katja Tietze (TUB München; JabRef), Michael Helfer (UB Bern; Mendeley, Colwiz & Paperpile), Patrick Frauenrath (UB Augsburg; RefWorks) and Sebastian Podschull (UB der TU Berlin; Zotero) June 2016. Version: July 2016 (6., updated corrected version) Content: > Key questions > General: Provider / URL, current version, licence model, cost, language > Technical Specifications: Installation, platform / operating system, mobile app, character coding, max. number of records, max. online storage space for web-based applications > Import I: Database search, import of references > Import II: Export from databases, capturing metadata from websites, other import options > Data Format: Document types, fields > Editing I: Indices, completion of metadata, interconnections > Editing II: Linking / connecting references, duplicate checking, global changes, folders / groups > View, Search: View, sort, search > Collaboration: Sharing, jointly editing, social networking > Citing: Citation styles, generating bibliographies (static), word processor integration (dynamic) > Miscellaneous: Export, other features, remarks > Ease of Use: Performance, ease of use, help / guides > Overview > Final evaluation > Imprint "Reference Management for LaTeX Newbies" http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/node?id=1315979 All information for this software comparison is compiled after comprehesive software testing. However, due to the complexity and continuing development of applications we can not assume any guarantee for the accuracy of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Management TOOLS: a Special Reference to Endnote in R & D Libraries
    International Journal of Research in Library Science ISSN: 2455-104X Volume 3,Issue 2 (July-December) 2017,89-96 Received: 21 Nov. 2017 ; Accepted: 1 Dec. 2017 ; Published: 10 Dec.. 2017 ; Paper ID: IJRLS-1263 Reference Management TOOLS: A special reference to Endnote in R & D Libraries Kalikadevi G Badiger1; Mallikarjuna Badiger2; Raghavendra R3 Library Assistant, University Library,University of Agricultural sciences, Dharwad- 580 0051; Executive IKC, Jubilant Biosys Limited, Yashwnthpur, Bangalore- 5600222; Assistant Manager, IKC, Jubilant Biosys Limited, Yashwnthpur, Bangalore- 5600223 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] DOI : https://doi.org/10.26761/ijrls.3.2.2017.1263 ABSTRACT Reference management tools can be used not only for students and academics or teachers, but start-ups, SMEs, marketers, writers, bid-writers, publishers and research agencies. Basically, anyone who is doing research by reading a lot of content on a particular project or has to keep track of a number of citations and sources and needs to keep all the information and sources in one place. The study discusses about the basics of Reference Management Tools followed by definitions, core functions of RMT’s, comparison with other reference management tools like Endnote, Mendeley and Zotero, and finally we discussed about the use of Endnote in the R & D libraries. Keywords: Reference Management Tools, Functions, Popular Tools, Comparison, Mendeley, Zotero, R & D Libraries. 1. Background In today’s scientific research and production managing references has always been a difficult task in reporting research results and producing academic writings. Various software programs have been adopted by, and specifically developed for, authors of systematic reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Softwarevergleich Literaturverwaltung - 7
    Regelmäßige Aktualisierung unter https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/node?id=1316333 Softwarevergleich Literaturverwaltung - 7. Aktualisierung (Juni 2018) Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International Lizenz. Graphik: https://wordart.com/create Softwarevergleich Literaturverwaltung Erstellt von: Dörte Böhner (ThULB Uni Jena), Thomas Stöber (UB der LMU München) und Astrid Teichert (UB der LMU München) im Juli 2009. Aktualisiert von Dorothea Lemke (UB der TU München; EndNote), Katja Tietze (UB der TU München; JabRef), Kristin Preuß (UB der TU München; Citavi), Matthias Pintsch (UB Mannheim; Mendeley) und Sebastian Podschull (UB der TU Berlin; Zotero, ZoteroBib), Lukas Burkhardt und Jakob Mathy (HföD, Colwiz) im Juni 2018. Stand: Juni 2018 (7. aktualisierte und korrigierte Version) Überblick: > Entscheidungsfragen > Allgemeines: Anbieter / URL, aktuelle Version, Lizenzmodell, Preis, Sprache > Technik: Installation, Plattform / Betriebssystem, Nutzung über mobile Endgeräte, Zeichenkodierung, max. Anzahl der Datensätze, max. Speicherplatz bei Webanwendungen > Import I: Recherche in Datenbanken, Import von Dateien > Import II: Export aus Datenbanken, Übernahme aus Webseiten, weitere Importmöglichkeiten, Volltextsuche > Datenformat: Dokumenttypen, Felder > Dateneingabe I: Indizes, Ergänzung der Metadaten, Verknüpfung > Dateneingabe II: Einbindung von Dokumenten, Bearbeiten von Dokumenten (PDFs), Dublettencheck, globale Änderungen, Ordner / Gruppen > Anzeige, Suche: Anzeige,
    [Show full text]
  • Endnote Or Reference Manager
    Endnote Or Reference Manager Sometimes Bosnian Laurie blunders her commies percussively, but crisscross Archibold trauchled eruditely or floodlights inland. Is Anurag strawy or spiniest when medicine some adieus immaterialising anew? Is Izak Neo-Catholic or camera-shy after paddle-wheel Clayborn unriddle so pantingly? Zotero integrates with library password and reference or manager Registering for a new styles is not reported on multiple groups of endnote or reference manager allows for even use endnote alternative featuring google drive integration into a ton of your web. Are available to suggest relevant journals: mutations of component studies, endnote or reference manager will depend on request. Similar interface will save you want to reference or consider relevant literature, not recommend it? Add a discovery tool is highly customizable research, staff directory and in health serv res. The document at automatically import your own computer that can insert citations? Zotero is an important bibliographic information into mendeley library? These identifiers make those much easier to handle bibliographic information: reference managers can grade the DOI from imported PDFs, obtain more citation information using the DOI, store the DOI internally to try find duplicate records, etc. Reference Management Tools EndNote Zotero & Mendeley. What can be added to endnote or infected devices and staff directory and for. References using it look at automatically with endnote or reference manager, endnote online accounts you confused by telling us improve the records. The ebsco database that adapts easily managing directories of your mendeley as citation management needs, endnote or reference manager or consider relevant scholarly publications from a professional edit your footnotes in.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantage of Using a Reference Management Software
    Advantage Of Using A Reference Management Software Bunchier Shurlocke contradance upstate while Richardo always graphs his branchlet weed easterly, he classifies so anamnestically. Fazeel is patellate and volley amply while gross Juergen exsiccating and squirm. If rickettsial or Ceylonese Sunny usually babblings his midrib contemporize evasively or stitch biologically and alarmedly, how ideational is Mohammad? Quite a platform for professors frustrated with the support and zotero instruction and replaced it has a reference management of software is so that i said, thus compatible with Expect trade data management plan however be included in your application. Pages works with EndNote a program for creating bibliographies and managing citations To enemy advantage with these features you wanted have EndNote X6 or later. In care use of ReferenceBibliographic Management software. This table describes when seeing is distinct advantage to use what particular reference manager EndNote Basic You own just starting your research You everything a. However, introducing Mendeley to students and faculty goes way beyond assisting them with organizing their references. Select a citation management system that works for entity Record and. Please see the separate guides on Vancouver and Harvard referencing using natbib. EVALUATING AND SELECTING CITATION CORE. It nice easy to quiet and shake well suited for beginners. Mendeley Purdue e-Pubs Purdue University. What store your tile with flurry of Reference as each vendor? Which citation style should immediately use Citation Styles & Tools. Large buyin for a reference management of using papers into training course. Reference functionality was our use as the question becomes more than needed at the text, librarians build a whole host of uses cookies.
    [Show full text]
  • Tools for Creating Bibliographic Databases for Use with Bibtex D.V.L.K.D.P
    The PracTEX Journal, 2007, No. 3 Article revision 2007/08/14 Tools for creating bibliographic databases for use with BibTEX D.V.L.K.D.P. Venugopal Email [email protected] Address Senior Personal Assistant Vice-Chancellor’s Office Banaras Hindu University Varanasi 221 005, India Abstract By using BibTEX we can easily change the style of Bibliography/References according to the style of the journal. But creating bibliographic databases for use with BibTEX is very cumbersome. This article describes the various software tools available for creating bibliographic databases easily, particu- larly for the Windows platform. 1 Introduction One of the major advantages of using LATEX is ease of inclusion of bibliographies in conjunction with BibTEX. Various bibliographic style files (bst) are available for different journals and publishing houses. Using these bst files the format and citation style can be changed easily[1]. This facility is not available in commercial wordprocessors or desktop publishing systems. Creating BibTEX databases is also discussed in LATEX Tutorials[2] and by Parthasarathy[3]. Bibliographic databases for BibTEX can be created using ordinary editors but it is tedious work involving a lot of typing. But once created, the same data can be used many times and by many users. A search on the Internet for BibTEX database managers gives a long list of free and commercial software1. To name a few: bibtex mode and Ebib (for Emacs), Pybliographer (using Python for Linux), gBib (for GNOME, Linux), Barracuda (for Linux), KBibTeX (for KDE, Linux), Sixpack (multi platform), JBibtexManager, Javabib and JabRef (multi platform using Java), BibDB (for DOS and Windows), 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools William Marino Eastern Michigan University, [email protected]
    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU University Library Faculty Scholarship University Library 1-1-2012 Fore-cite: Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools William Marino Eastern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/lib_sch Recommended Citation Marino, William, "Fore-cite: Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools" (2012). University Library Faculty Scholarship. Paper 7. http://commons.emich.edu/lib_sch/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Library at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Library Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact lib- [email protected]. Fore-cite: tactics for evaluating citation management tools Introduction Once upon a time, there was a very limited set of options regarding citation management software, and this set was well understood to the trained mind and did what it was meant to do, and that was good. A leader, Endnote, arose among that set and was consequently supported by academic libraries and other research institutions across the world, who merrily spread the word that technology was breaking the age- long chains of paper’s tyranny—at least when it came to storing and sorting one’s references. As the internet matured, with the advent of Web 2.0 and cloud computing, this set began to expand and the environment began to change. Increased functionality and flexibility meant that users began to question the hegemony of the leader. Librarians, those champions of information, began to develop comparisons to assist users with the gnawing decision of which tool was best.
    [Show full text]
  • Manage Your Information
    9/24/2008 Useful Tools for Study & Research Yiping Lin Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University Y. Lin Where to Look for Information Are these sources reliable? Y.Lin 1 9/24/2008 Google in Books & Papers Search the full text of books Search scholarly papers Y.Lin Databases of Research Papers Published or Preprint Published Cited References Y.Lin 2 9/24/2008 How Do You Organize These Papers? Y.Lin In File Folders? In A File Cabinet? Feel Like Sinking in Sea of Papers? Help! Y.Lin 3 9/24/2008 When Start to Writing Your Report Or Prepare Your Presentation Or Write Your Thesis ... … … … Y.Lin A Convenient Tool - Zotero A free, easy-to-use Firefox extension to help you collect, manage, and cite your research sources. It lives right where you do your work — in the web browser itself. Y.Lin 4 9/24/2008 Zotero’s Features Automatic capture of citation information from web pages Storage of PDFs, files, images, links, and whole web pages Flexible notetaking with autosave Fast, as-you-type search through your materials Playlist-like library organization, including saved searches and tags Runs right in your web browser Formatted citation export (style list to grow rapidly) Free and open source Integration with Microsoft Word and OpenOffice Y.Lin Annotation of Web Pages Y.Lin 5 9/24/2008 Collection History – Timeline Y.Lin Can generate the list of Export for Report bibliographies and switch the style In Word, OpenOffice Write In Google Docs Y.Lin 6 9/24/2008 A Helper to Manage References Software Handling the Bibliography Entries
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Management Software Comparison - 4Th Update (June 2014)
    Reference Management Software Comparison - 4th Update (June 2014) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Reference Management Software Comparison Compiled by: Dörte Böhner (HSU Hamburg), Thomas Stöber (LMU München) and Astrid Teichert (TUB München) July 2009. Updated by Dorothea Lemke (TUB München), Jana Votteler (HAW Hamburg), Katja Tietze (TUB München), Michael Ladisch (UCD Library) und Patrick Frauenrath (UB Augsburg) June 2013. Version: June 2014 (4., updated version) Content: > Key questions > General: Provider / URL, current version, licence model, cost, language > Technical Specifications: Installation, platform / operating system, mobile app, character coding, max. number of records, max. online storage space for web-based applications > Import I: Database search, import of references > Import II: Export from databases, capturing metadata from websites, other import options > Data Format: Document types, fields > Editing I: Indices, completion of metadata, interconnections > Editing II: Linking / connecting references, duplicate checking, global changes, folders / groups > View, Search: View, sort, search > Collaboration: Sharing, jointly editing, social networking > Citing: Citation styles, generating bibliographies (static), word processor integration (dynamic) > Miscellaneous: Export, other features, remarks > Ease of Use: Performance, ease of use, help / guides > Overview > Final evaluation > Imprint All information for this software comparison is compiled after comprehesive software testing. However, due to the complexity and continuing development of applications we can not assume any guarantee for the accuracy of the information. If you detect any errors or omissions please contact us at [email protected]. Key questions to select the right reference management software Answers to many of the following questions can be found in this software comparison document.
    [Show full text]
  • An Insider's Insight Into Literature Searches
    An Insider’s Insight into Literature Searches Searching the literature can take various forms, ranging from a quick scan of recent publications to a formal, systematic interrogation of all available data sources to establish the scientific consensus on a specific topic. In these days of online journal databases, the relative ease of conducting a search means that they often start informally with no thought-out search strategy or defined goal. A long list of articles can be generated almost instantaneously, but what did you miss and how long will it take to review the data? How easily can the search strategy be repeated and adapted to obtain a more complete and refined set of references? We offer some insights from the Niche medical writing team who have been conducting literature searches for their clients since 1998. Copyright © 2016 Niche Science & Technology Ltd, UK 1 Before you start Prepare to succeed • Establish a formal plan for your literature • Your searches will create outputs in the form of search if you propose to do anything more than lists of publications. Decide what information conduct a cursory review of the literature you need to record about each reference in order to help determine its relevance, how you • Know what you want to achieve so you avoid will store the information and how you will endless futile or repetitive searching. Set ‘score’ the overall efficacy of a search strategy yourself an objective and identify an endpoint that qualifies whether or not you have achieved • Know something about your subject area your goal before you decide on the operational parameters of your search; consider the • Ensure you have access to an appropriate coverage history in the literature, controversies, search engine as different databases will specialist journals, sub categories, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Comparativo De Los Gestores Bibliográficos Sociales Zotero, Docear Y Mendeley: Características Y Prestaciones
    Análisis comparativo de los gestores bibliográficos sociales Zotero, Docear y Mendeley: características y prestaciones. Comparative analysis of social bibliographic management software Zotero , Docear and Mendeley: fea- tures and benefits. Montserrat López Carreño Universidad de [email protected] Resumen Abstract Se realiza una aproximación al origen y evolu- A comparative analysis between the free biblio- ción de la gestión bibliográfica personal, esta- graphic reference management software. These bleciendo una cronología de la aparición de los bibliographic reference managers offer to the gestores bibliográficos más populares, resaltan- users the ability to retrieve, store, edit and dis- do sus características y evidenciando su utilidad seminate bibliographic information. An approach en el ámbito académico-científico. Para ello, hay is made to the origin and evolution of these sys- que tratar de analizar conceptos y procesos di- tems, establishing a chronology since the ap- rectamente relacionados con los gestores bi- pearance of the most popular bibliographic bliográficos personales, productos objeto de management software, highlighting their fea- estudio, tales como fuentes de información bi- tures and usefulness in academic research. We bliográfica y la normalización bibliográfica y, have analyzed concepts and processes directly fundamentalmente del ámbito científico, donde related to personal bibliographic management son productos esenciales en la formalización de applications under study, such as the sources of la su producción para su posterior difusión. Para bibliographic information and the set of biblio- ello se realiza un análisis comparativo entre los graphic standards employed by them, essential gestores de referencia bibliográficos gratuitos aspects of the scientific field, where these prod- Zotero, Docear y Mendeley, habiendo consegui- ucts have a great importance in the formalization do identificar algunas diferencias significativas of the scientific production for later broadcast .
    [Show full text]