DOCSLIB.ORG

Análisis Comparativo De Los Gestores Bibliográficos Sociales Zotero, Docear Y Mendeley: Características Y Prestaciones

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Análisis Comparativo De Los Gestores Bibliográficos Sociales Zotero, Docear Y Mendeley: Características Y Prestaciones Análisis comparativo de los gestores bibliográficos sociales Zotero, Docear y Mendeley: características y prestaciones. Comparative analysis of social bibliographic management software Zotero , Docear and Mendeley: fea- tures and benefits. Montserrat López Carreño Universidad de [email protected] Resumen Abstract Se realiza una aproximación al origen y evolu- A comparative analysis between the free biblio- ción de la gestión bibliográfica personal, esta- graphic reference management software. These bleciendo una cronología de la aparición de los bibliographic reference managers offer to the gestores bibliográficos más populares, resaltan- users the ability to retrieve, store, edit and dis- do sus características y evidenciando su utilidad seminate bibliographic information. An approach en el ámbito académico-científico. Para ello, hay is made to the origin and evolution of these sys- que tratar de analizar conceptos y procesos di- tems, establishing a chronology since the ap- rectamente relacionados con los gestores bi- pearance of the most popular bibliographic bliográficos personales, productos objeto de management software, highlighting their fea- estudio, tales como fuentes de información bi- tures and usefulness in academic research. We bliográfica y la normalización bibliográfica y, have analyzed concepts and processes directly fundamentalmente del ámbito científico, donde related to personal bibliographic management son productos esenciales en la formalización de applications under study, such as the sources of la su producción para su posterior difusión. Para bibliographic information and the set of biblio- ello se realiza un análisis comparativo entre los graphic standards employed by them, essential gestores de referencia bibliográficos gratuitos aspects of the scientific field, where these prod- Zotero, Docear y Mendeley, habiendo consegui- ucts have a great importance in the formalization do identificar algunas diferencias significativas of the scientific production for later broadcast . entre ellos que deben ser consideradas antes For this, we have performed a comparative de utilizarlos. analysis between the free bibliographic refer- Palabras clave: Gestores bibliográficos, Refe- ence managers: Zotero, Mendeley and Docear. rencias Bibliográficas, Zotero, Docear, Mende- We have achieved some significant differences ley. identified between these systems that we be- lieve should be considered before using them in research projects. Keywords: Bibliographic Management Softwa- re, Bibliographic References, Zotero, Docear, Mendeley. cuando consultan las bases de datos bibliográfi- 1. Introducción cas es el almacenar debidamente toda la infor- El investigador o el estudiante, hoy en día, pre- mación consultada, es decir, artículos, libros, cisan tener conocimientos informáticos y docu- páginas web, noticias de blogs, etc. Una de las mentales a la hora de gestionar las fuentes de principales y más interesantes herramientas información consultadas, es decir, deben cono- para los investigadores son los gestores biblio- cer las fuentes de información donde poder en- gráficos, los cuales poseen la capacidad de re- contrar lo que necesitan, tendrán que poder al- copilar, almacenar y dar formato a la informa- macenar dicha información, así como saber citar ción. Los gestores bibliográficos son herramien- dichas referencias bibliográficas. tas que recogen las referencias bibliográficas de manera manual o automática, a partir de bús- Uno de los problemas a los que se enfrentan 52 quedas en las bases de datos de investigación formación genera un fichero en for- (catálogos de bibliotecas, índices, bases de da- mato RIS (1) u otro, que importamos tos de revistas científicas, páginas web, etc.), y con el gestor. permiten organizar las citas y la bibliografía de los trabajos de investigación. Salida de datos: Citas bibliográficas Desde la aparición de los programas Reference Teniendo en cuenta los distintos entornos po- Manager (en 1984) y EndNote (en 1988), los demos distinguir los siguientes tipos de gestores gestores bibliográficos han evolucionado mucho bibliográficos: en función de las necesidades de sus usuarios, Gestores de referencia clásicos o de es- ofreciendo cada vez más prestaciones. Actual- critorio: aquellos programas que deben mente, aparte de ofrecer la posibilidad de captu- ser instalados previamente en el orde- rar distintos tipos de información, editarla, alma- nador donde se vaya a utilizar y donde cenarla, organizarla y darle formato de salida. se almacenará la información. Por También ofrecen la capacidad de interactuar y ejemplo: Reference Manager, etc. colaborar con los usuarios a través de grupos públicos y privados, redes sociales e incluso Gestores en el entorno web: aquellos feedback (el usuario puede sugerir o votar mejo- que alojan la información de las bases rar en el software como hace Mendeley). Estos de datos en un servidor, lo que permite programas permiten elaborar bibliografías y lis- un acceso rápido y práctico a la misma tas de lecturas recomendadas en un formato desde cualquier lugar. Por ejemplo: Zo- estándar. También sirven para desarrollar de tero, Docear, Mendeley, etc forma automática la lista de referencias biblio- gráficas de los documentos citados y las notas a Gestores de referencias sociales: estos pie de página al final de un documento de texto. gestores unen a las funciones tradicio- Estas herramientas se usan para que el investi- nales las capacidades de las redes so- gador: ciales para descubrir y compartir infor- Pueda mantenerse organizado en el mación bibliográfica. Por ejemplo: Con- desarrollo de su trabajo. notea, BibSonomy, etc. Evite errores de transcripción o tipográ- Gestores de referencias bajo licencia: ficos. aquellos gestores en los que se requiere una suscripción al producto. Por ejem- Haga un uso fácil de la cita y de la crea- plo, Procite, EndNote, etc . ción de las bibliografías. A priori, los sistemas más populares y gratuitos Estos gestores bibliográficos son considerados son de características muy similares, destacan- como herramientas tecnológicas creadas para do de entre el cada vez mayor número de gesto- apoyar el proceso editorial, ahorrar tiempo, faci- res en virtud de sus prestaciones y su gratuidad, litar el manejo de los recursos bibliográficos y las aplicaciones Zotero (2006), Docear (2008) y evitar que se puedan producir errores en el pro- Mendeley (2009). Una de las principales carac- ceso de redacción manual de los trabajos cientí- terísticas de estos gestores bibliográficos es su ficos. (Pérez Borges, 2010). Podemos calificar- gratuidad. Según Magán Wals (2009): los como herramientas muy interesantes para “Internet ha posibilitado la aparición de gestionar la información científica. Estos pro- bases de datos bibliográficas de carác- gramas se caracterizan por la facilidad en la ter gratuito que están cuestionando los entrada y salida de los datos: sistemas tradicionales de consulta ba- Entrada de datos: importación de datos sados en el cobro”. de las distintas fuentes de información. Estos gestores bibliográficos actuales se orien- Pueden ser de las siguientes formas: tan más a facilitar la tarea a los usuarios. Según Cordón García (2009): Entrada automática: desde la propia fuente de información. “Zotero integra un icono en la barra de direcciones que identifica el producto, Entrada directa: desde el propio te- (libro, artículo de revista, página web) clado por parte del usuario. haciendo especialmente sencillo su ma- nejo”. Entrada indirecta: la fuente de in- López Carreño, M. (2014) Análisis comparativo de los gestores bibliográficos sociales Zotero, Docear y Mendeley: características y prestaciones. Cuadernos de Gestión de Información 4, p51-66. ISSN 2253-8429 53 2. Metodología del estudio lugar de los documentos. Permite crear catego- rías dentro de un PDF, las ordena, gestiona e Del amplio conjunto de aplicaciones de gestión importa las anotaciones. Permite integrarse con bibliográfica del que se dispone actualmente (2), los procesadores de MS Word, LibreOffi- se ha decidido analizar tres de ellos porque ce/OpenOffice, y LaTeX. Desarrollado por la ofrecen la mayoría de las prestaciones de los Universidad de California, Berkeley y bajo la gestores clásicos a las que se une la posibilidad licencia Pública General GNU. de compartir socialmente todos los registros generados en dichas herramientas. Por otro la- Mendeley (posiblemente el gestor más de moda do, nos ha parecido determinante que se traten entre la comunidad científica actual), es un de herramientas de software libre, válidas y software de gestión bibliográfica gratuito (acce- abiertas a toda la comunidad científica. Así so libre), que permite generar, organizar, citar y pues, se van a describir las características y compartir automáticamente referencias biblio- prestaciones de los siguientes gestores: Zotero, gráficas. Permite extraer los metadatos de los Docear y Mendeley. documentos PDF. Y permite sincronizar auto- máticamente su biblioteca a través de escritorio, Se va a analizar cómo estos gestores bibliográ- web y móvil. Ofrece la opción de descargar la ficos capturan, guardan, organizan las distintas aplicación en iPhone y iPad. Permite integrarse referencias bibliográficas, en qué tipo de siste- con los procesadores de MS Word, LibreOffi- mas operativos se pueden instalar o utilizar, los ce/OpenOffice, y LaTeX. Desarrollado por la formatos de archivos que pueden exportar des- editorial Elsevier y con licencia propia. de otros gestores de referencia, los formatos
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparison of Researcher's Reference Management Software
    Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 561-568, July 2014 (ISSN: 2220-6140) A Comparison of Researcher’s Reference Management Software: Refworks, Mendeley, and EndNote Sujit Kumar Basak Durban University of Technology, South Africa [email protected] Abstract: This paper aimed to present a comparison of researcher’s reference management software such as RefWorks, Mendeley, and EndNote. This aim was achieved by comparing three software. The main results of this paper were concluded by comparing three software based on the experiment. The novelty of this paper is the comparison of researcher’s reference management software and it has showed that Mendeley reference management software can import more data from the Google Scholar for researchers. This finding could help to know researchers to use the reference management software. Keywords: Reference management software, comparison and researchers 1. Introduction Reference management software maintains a database to references and creates bibliographies and the reference lists for the written works. It makes easy to read and to record the elements for the reference comprises such as the author’s name, year of publication, and the title of an article, etc. (Reiss & Reiss, 2002). Reference Management Software is usually used by researchers, technologists, scientists, and authors, etc. to keep their records and utilize the bibliographic citations; hence it is one of the most complicated aspects among researchers. Formatting references as a matter of fact depends on a variety of citation styles which have been made the citation manager very essential for researchers at all levels (Gilmour & Cobus-Kuo, 2011). Reference management software is popularly known as bibliographic software, citation management software or personal bibliographic file managers (Nashelsky & Earley, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Studies and Analysis of Reference Management Software: a Literature Review
    Studies and analysis of reference management software: a literature review Jesús Tramullas Ana Sánchez-Casabón {jesus,asanchez}@unizar.es Dept .of Library & Information Science, University of Zaragoza Piedad Garrido-Picazo [email protected] Dept. of Computer and Software Engineering, University of Zaragoza Abstract: Reference management software is a well-known tool for scientific research work. Since the 1980s, it has been the subject of reviews and evaluations in library and information science literature. This paper presents a systematic review of published studies that evaluate reference management software with a comparative approach. The objective is to identify the types, models, and evaluation criteria that authors have adopted, in order to determine whether the methods used provide adequate methodological rigor and useful contributions to the field of study. Keywords: reference management software, evaluation methods, bibliography. 1. Introduction and background Reference management software has been a useful tool for researchers since the 1980s. In those early years, tools were made ad-hoc, and some were based on the dBase II/III database management system (Bertrand and Bader, 1980; Kunin, 1985). In a short period of time a market was created and commercial products were developed to provide support to this type of information resources. The need of researchers to systematize scientific literature in both group and personal contexts, and to integrate mechanisms into scientific production environments in order to facilitate and expedite the process of writing and publishing research results, requires that these types of applications receive almost constant attention in specialized library and information science literature. The result of this interest is reflected, in bibliographical terms, in the publication of numerous articles almost exclusively devoted to describing, analyzing, and comparing the characteristics of several reference management software products (Norman, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Mendeley Mendeley Is a Reference and Citation Manager Available for Free up to 2 GB of Web Storage (More Storage Is Available for $55 Per Year)
    Mendeley Mendeley is a reference and citation manager available for free up to 2 GB of web storage (more storage is available for $55 per year). Mendeley is available as a desktop app, mobile app, as well as online. An MS Word extension allows users to connect to and cite their references while writing. Mendeley allows users to add resources in three ways. First, one may upload a PDF to Mendeley. Mendeley stores the PDF and allows the user to comment on and write notes in the PDF. Users may also enter sources manually, in cases where no PDF is present. For this entry approach, a few templates are available for the most common resource types. Users may also use the web extension to download source information from the web. Once sources have been entered, users can then then organize their sources in a variety of ways. The most prevalent use is through folders, which allow users to categorize sources by topic or project. However, users can also create tags for their files and sources so that they can search for keywords or topics that are important to them. Points in favor: • In-app PDF reader with commentary ability Points against: • Surprising lack of resource templates and information fields (e.g. no template for a conference paper or a book with translator). • MS Word extension has bugs that cause it to crash. Screenshots: Microsoft Word Citation Generator Although we tested Microsoft Word primarily as a writing app, the program includes a citation generator which was tested for facility and accuracy alongside the other reference management apps.1 Like other apps, MS Word has templates for common and uncommon resource types, including book, journal, and sound recording.
    [Show full text]
  • “Merging Libraries” & “Export Your Library with RIS”
    “Merging libraries” & “Export your library with RIS” Export library with RIS To convert your EndNote X6 library for other applications (like Zotero, Mendeley, Reference Manager or ProCite etc.): - In EndNote X6, go to the drop-down output style list on the toolbar, and choose Select Another Style. Highlight and select the appropriate output style: - Select the RefMan (RIS) style. - From the File menu, select Export to export your library to a plain text file. - Now you can import the file into your application To import RIS file from another application into EndNote: 1 Library Wissenschaftspark Albert Einstein A joint library of the German Research Centre for Geosciences GFZ, the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research Unit Potsdam, and the IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam (Last update: March 2013) - Got to “File” and “Import” - Choose your file in RIS format - Use the RIS import option. - Set your preferences - Import the references 2 Library Wissenschaftspark Albert Einstein A joint library of the German Research Centre for Geosciences GFZ, the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research Unit Potsdam, and the IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam (Last update: March 2013) Merging libraries There are three ways to merge libraries: import one library into another, copy references from one library to another, or drag-and-drop. - (Optional) If you want to import only a subset of references from a library, first open that library and show only the references you wish to copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tool Support for the Search Process of Systematic Literature Reviews
    Institute of Architecture of Application Systems University of Stuttgart Universitätsstraße 38 D–70569 Stuttgart Bachelorarbeit Tool Support for the Search Process of Systematic Literature Reviews Dominik Voigt Course of Study: Informatik Examiner: Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Frank Leymann Supervisor: Karoline Wild, M.Sc. Commenced: May 4, 2020 Completed: November 4, 2020 Abstract Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a popular research method with adoption across different research domains that is used to draw generalizations, compose multiple existing concepts into a new one, or identify conflicts and gaps in existing research. Within the Information Technology domain, researchers face multiple challenges during the search step of an SLR which are caused by the use of different query languages by digital libraries. This thesis proposes tool support that provides cross-library search by using a common query language across digital libraries. For this the existing digital library APIs and query languages have been analyzed and a new cross-library query language and transformation was developed that allows the formulation of cross-library queries that can be transformed into existing query languages. These concepts have been integrated within an existing reference management tool to provide integrated and automated cross-library search and result management to address the challenges faced by Information Technology researchers during the search step. 3 Contents 1 Introduction 13 2 Background and Fundamentals 15 2.1 Systematic Literature Review Process ....................... 15 2.2 Metadata Formats for Literature Reference Management ............. 20 2.3 Queries on Digital Libraries ............................ 21 2.4 Challenges during the Search Process ....................... 24 3 Related Work 29 3.1 Existing Approaches ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliografijos Ir PDF Tvarkymas Inžinerinės Grafikos Katedros
    Bibliografijos ir PDF tvarkymas Inžinerinės grafikos katedros Kontaktai lektorius Edgaras Timinskas [email protected] Kūriniui Bibliografijos ir PDF tvarkymas, autorius Edgaras Timinskas, yra suteikta 2020-04-29 Creative Commons Priskyrimas - Nekomercinis platinimas - Analogiškas platinimas Pristatymą rasite: dspace.vgtu.lt 4.0 Tarptautinė licencija. Kuriuos citavimo įrankius naudojate? Prašau užpildykite trumpą apklausą. Pažymėkite įrankius, kuriuos naudojate rengdami mokslo darbus. https://goo.gl/forms/nsZK2tDo846bz3og1 2 Kuriuos socialinius tinklus naudojate? Prašau užpildykite trumpą apklausą. Pažymėkite socialinius tinklus, kuriuos naudojate mokslinei veiklai. https://goo.gl/forms/H9mLAzxnvF0PKOjG2 3 Turinys 1. Įvadas 13. Kiti mokslininkų socialiniai tinklai 2. Bibliografijos tvarkymas 14. Mokslinių išteklių paieška 3. PDF tvarkymas 15. Naudingos nuorodos ir literatūra 4. Programinių paketų palyginimas 5. Programos MENDELEY galimybės 6. Programos MENDELEY naudos 7. Programos MENDELEY diegimas 8. Darbas su programa MENDELEY 9. Citavimas su programa MENDELEY 10. Informacijos įkėlimas iš interneto 11. MENDELEY internete 12. Pagalbos centras 1 Įvadas Turinys Bibliografijos ir PDF tvarkymas (1) http://julitools.en.made-in-china.com/product/MqcmywkvlIVa/China-Axe- with-Plastic-Coating-Handle-A601-.html http://36.media.tumblr.com/5cbd642358a9b3eb547efa6 6e018fd4b/tumblr_mqkg2icebG1qzh8wko10_1280.jpg 6 Bibliografijos ir PDF tvarkymas (2) http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/digitalscrapbooking/ig/Manly-Digital- Scrapbooking-Kit/Oak-Tree.htm
    [Show full text]
  • On Publication Usage in a Social Bookmarking System
    On Publication Usage in a Social Bookmarking System Daniel Zoller Stephan Doerfel Robert Jäschke Data Mining and Information ∗ L3S Research Center Retrieval Group ITeG, Knowledge and Data [email protected] University of Würzburg Engineering (KDE) Group [email protected] University of Kassel wuerzburg.de [email protected] Gerd Stumme Andreas Hotho ITeG, Knowledge and Data Data Mining and Information Engineering Group (KDE) Retrieval Group University of Kassel University of Würzburg [email protected] [email protected] kassel.de wuerzburg.de ABSTRACT The creation of impact measures from such data has been Scholarly success is traditionally measured in terms of cita- subsumed under the umbrella term altmetrics (alternative tions to publications. With the advent of publication man- metrics). According to the Altmetrics Manifesto [4] the agement and digital libraries on the web, scholarly usage goals of this initiative are to complement traditional bib- data has become a target of investigation and new impact liometric measures, to introduce diversity in measuring im- metrics computed on such usage data have been proposed pact, and to supplement peer-review. The manifesto also { so called altmetrics. In scholarly social bookmarking sys- appeals: \Work should correlate between altmetrics and ex- tems, scientists collect and manage publication meta data isting measures, predict citations from altmetrics and com- and thus reveal their interest in these publications. In this pare altmetrics with expert evaluation." In that spirit, we work, we investigate connections between usage metrics and analyze the usage metrics that can be computed in the social citations, and find posts, exports, and page views of publi- web system BibSonomy,1 a bookmarking tool for publica- cations to be correlated to citations.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Your Company Needs a Reference Management Tool and Four Factors to Consider When Selecting One
    Why your company needs a reference management tool And four factors to consider when selecting one Does the following scenario sound familiar to you? Your company needs to keep on top of the latest research findings to stay competitive. Team members will find and locate PDF articles and save them on their own computers. In another workgroup, the same paper might be found, purchased, and analyzed as well. One year later, the paper might be needed for another project, but since no one could find it on the net- work, it’s then located, purchased, and analyzed again. All of this extra work means wasted time and money for your compa- ny. What’s more, this problem could have been avoided if the PDF and its notes had simply been saved in a place where other team members could find them. Reference management software can help with this challenge, since it provides a central place for saving external literature and making it easy to find again. Originally developed for the university environmvent, reference management programs have been increasingly adopted by knowledge-oriented companies over the past decade. 1/11 Three challenges – finding, saving, and protecting information Reference management software helps with three main challenges that knowledge-oriented companies face: • Being able to pick out useful sources and ideas from the multitude of information that is published and then later find it again. • Working together in a team to create a knowledge repository, thus making each team member’s information and insights available to everyone else in the group. • Protecting this hard-won knowledge from loss or access by third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibsonomy: a Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System
    BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System Andreas Hotho,1 Robert Jaschke,¨ 1,2 Christoph Schmitz,1 Gerd Stumme1,2 1 Knowledge & Data Engineering Group, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Kassel, Wilhelmshoher¨ Allee 73, D–34121 Kassel, Germany http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de 2 Research Center L3S, Expo Plaza 1, D–30539 Hannover, Germany http://www.l3s.de Abstract. Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such sys- tems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating. In this paper we specify a formal model for folksonomies and briefly describe our own system BibSonomy, which allows for sharing both book- marks and publication references in a kind of personal library. 1 Introduction Complementing the Semantic Web effort, a new breed of so-called “Web 2.0” appli- cations is currently emerging on the Web. These include user-centric publishing and knowledge management platforms like Wikis, Blogs, and social resource sharing tools. These tools, such as Flickr3 or del.icio.us,4 have acquired large numbers of users within less than two years.5 The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating, and that these tools yield immediate benefit for each individual user (e.g. organizing ones bookmarks in a browser-independent, persistent fashion) without too much overhead. Large numbers of users have created huge amounts of information within a very short period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing a Reference Manager
    Choosing a Reference Manager Reference Guide Edition 1 June 2019 Document Reference: 3910-2019 Choosing a reference manager Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 Mendeley ................................................................................................................................... 4 Zotero ......................................................................................................................................... 5 EndNote ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Citavi ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Frequently Asked Questions .................................................................................................... 11 If you require this document in an alternative format, such as large print, please contact Catherine Koppe in the Digital Skills and Training team by email [email protected] or phone 0131 6513233 © Lilinaz Rouhani & Catherine Koppe, University of Edinburgh 2019 CC BY Table of contents 1 Choosing a reference manager Introduction Welcome to the Choosing a Reference Manager reference guide. This guide has been produced by Information Services' Digital Skills and Training team to support our popular "Introduction to Reference Managers" classroom course. The aim
    [Show full text]
  • Exportación a Otros Pgb
    EXPORTACIÓN A OTROS PGB CÓMO EXPORTAR DE ZOTERO A ENDNOTE En Zotero una colección concreta -> botón derecho del ratón , exportar y guardar en formato RIS o Refer/BibIX En EndNote: File -> Import -> Reference Manager (RIS) o Refer/BibIX ENDNOTEWEB En Zotero guardar como .RIS En EndNoteweb importar con el filtro RefMan (RIS) PROCITE En Zotero guardar en formato RIS En Procite, Tools -> Import Text file -> Open Import file -> Nombre: Mi biblioteca.ris. Tipo ->All files REFERENCE MANAGER En Zotero guardar Mi biblioteca como .ris En Reference Manager- en File New Database u Open Database -> En File -> Import Text file->el que queremos “Mi biblioteca.ris”->Filter RIS REFWORK En Zotero guardar como .ris En RefWorks-> Importar-> Filtro RIS UTF-8 CÓMO EXPORTAR DE ENDNOTE A ZOTERO En EndNote -> File -> Export -> My EndNote Library -> en .txt. Output Style - > RefMan (RIS) En Zotero -> importar -> Tipo RIS ENDNOTEWEB En EndNote -> Tools-> Connect EndNote Web PROCITE En Procite Tools -> Convert file->elegir el archivo de EndNote y guardar con otro nombre REFERENCE MANAGER En EndNote File Export filtro refinan (RIS) export, como archivo .txt En Reference Manager, File Import Text file REFWORK De EndNote v.8 o superior exportación directa. Si falla en otras versiones ver Ayuda de RefWorks CÓMO EXPORTAR DE ENDNOTEWEB A ENDNOTE ZOTERO PROCITE REFERENCE MANAGER REFWORK Elegir exportar como RIS y seleccionar esta opción al importar a los progrmas CÓMO EXPORTAR DE PROCITE A ENDNOTE En Procite guardar cualquier archivo en Procite. En EndNote File -> Open library elegir el archivo de Procite-> File of type -> Procite ZOTERO En Procite, si no tenemos el filtro EndNote-RIS importarlo de www.procite.com .
    [Show full text]
  • ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Graduate Student Use and Non-Use Of
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Graduate Student Use and Non-Use of Reference and PDF Management Software: An Exploratory Study Marie Speare1 Final version published as: Speare, M. (2018). Graduate Student Use and Non-Use of Reference and PDF Management Software: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 44(6), 762-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.019 Published In: Journal of Academic Librarianship Document Version: Accepted Manuscript Publisher rights ©2018 Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ . 1 Sciences and Technology Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0766-2763 Email: [email protected] ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT Graduate students at the University of Manitoba were surveyed to find out if they used reference management software (RMS), features used, challenges and barriers to using RMS. Interest in different types of PDF management features and training options were also investigated. Both users and non-users of reference management software were invited to participate. Non-users managed their citations and references with a variety of other tools. The principal reasons for non-use were that students were not aware of options that were available, and the amount of time needed to learn the program. RMS users also mentioned the steep learning curve, problems with extracting metadata from PDFs, technical issues, and problems with inaccurate citation styles. Most of the students saved PDF documents to their computer. Students were most interested in full-text searching of PDFs, automatic renaming of PDFs, and automatically extracting citation metadata from a PDF.
    [Show full text]