Geology.Gsapubs.Org on 30 September 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology.Gsapubs.Org on 30 September 2009 Downloaded from geology.gsapubs.org on 30 September 2009 Geology A surfeit of theropods in the Moroccan Late Cretaceous? Comparing diversity estimates from field data and fossil shops Alistair J. McGowan and Gareth J. Dyke Geology 2009;37;843-846 doi: 10.1130/G30188A.1 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geology Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes © 2009 Geological Society of America Downloaded from geology.gsapubs.org on 30 September 2009 A surfeit of theropods in the Moroccan Late Cretaceous? Comparing diversity estimates from fi eld data and fossil shops Alistair J. McGowan1* and Gareth J. Dyke2 1Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Biodiversity and Evolution at the Humboldt University Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, Berlin D-10115, Germany 2School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfi eld 4, Dublin, Ireland ABSTRACT COLLECTORSHIP BIASES An unusually high proportion of large-bodied carnivorous Similar collectorship biases have already been identifi ed in museum theropod dinosaurs has been reported from the Moroccan Late data: Davis and Pyenson (2007) performed a comparative analysis of Cretaceous Kem Kem Formation, a well-known package of North rarefaction curves of North American Paleocene mammal faunas from Africa vertebrate fossil–bearing sediments. We investigate whether museums and fi eld collections and reported a tendency for collector recorded proportions of predator and prey taxa in Kem Kem sedi- curves based on museum data to have steeper initial trajectories because ments are real, or an artifact generated by collecting biases, by com- of preferential sampling of rare taxa. Museums tend not to accumulate paring fi eld data to counts of fossil vertebrates from Moroccan fos- large numbers of common taxa, while rare taxa are biased in collections sil shops. The application of common techniques for standardizing toward “trophy specimens” (Davis and Pyenson, 2007). Guralnick and ecological survey data confi rms that previous workers have been Van Cleve (2005) demonstrated the importance of museum collections misled by the acquisition by museums of specimens from commer- for capturing records of rare taxa, increasing species-richness estimates cial collectors rather than from detailed fi eld surveying. Claims that for extant birds in southern Colorado. an unusual number of theropod dinosaurs were present in North Here we examine Stromer’s Riddle by comparing fi eld-counted ver- Africa Late Cretaceous ecosystems are likely the result of biases due tebrate abundance data from a single stratigraphically well correlated site to both commercial activity and collectorship biases. within the Kem Kem Formation to counts of fossils from Moroccan fossil shops. We suspect that data from fossil shops are analogous to museum INTRODUCTION collections in that they are unlikely to accurately sample true faunal pro- Vertebrate fossils have been known from the Kem Kem Forma- portions at a particular place and time, simply providing data about the tion in the Moroccan Sahara of North Africa for more than 50 years presence of taxa. Biases identifi ed by Guralnick and Van Cleve (2005) and (Lavocat, 1954). This intensively collected sequence (i.e., the Kem Kem Davis and Pyenson (2007) would be magnifi ed in shop data because the beds of Sereno et al., 1996) comprises Late Cretaceous (Albian–Ceno- rarity, or aesthetic appeal, of a fossil will augment its economic value, irre- manian) fl uvial and shallow-marine sediments exposed in southeast- spective of its scientifi c worth. Thus we address two questions. (1) How ern Morocco (Province d’Errachidia) around Erfoud (e.g., Hamada du comparable are fi eld and fossil shop-based surveys? (2) Were there really Guir and Tafi lalt) that are part of the “continental intercalaire” (Lavo- too many theropods in the Kem Kem Formation, or are collecting biases cat, 1954) that extended across much of North Africa during the late the source of reports of an unusual predator:prey ratio? Mesozoic. In terms of described taxa, taking fossil records at face value, large theropod dinosaurs were disproportionately abundant in Kem Kem MATERIALS AND METHODS Formation sediments (e.g., Russell, 1996; Sereno et al., 1996; Amiot et Field data come from the Kem Kem Formation locality of Gara Sba al., 2004; Weishampel et al., 2004), even though such a preponderance (e.g., Lavocat, 1954; Sereno et al., 1996) (030°30.879N, 004°50.224W) of carnivores defi es what we know about modern ecosystems (Farlow, in southeastern Morocco (Table 1). Field data were compared with aver- 1993). How could ecosystems like those that composed the Kem Kem aged counts of vertebrate fossils recorded in six Moroccan fossil dealer- have supported so many predators at the apex of the food chain, while ships (Table 1). Using rarefaction and resampling techniques, we tested relatively fewer potential prey taxa (e.g., herbivorous dinosaurs, smaller vertebrates) are known from the same sequence? We dub this paradox Stromer’s Riddle, after Ernst Stromer, who worked on fossil vertebrates TABLE 1. COUNTS OF INDIVIDUAL KEM KEM FORMATION FOSSILS from North Africa during the 1930s, describing some of the key taxa of AND ASSIGNMENTS TO BROAD VERTEBRATE TAXA large theropods (Stromer, 1936; Russell, 1996; Nothdurft, 2002). Under- Shops* Shops Field Field standing Stromer’s Riddle has wide implications for vertebrate paleo- (counts) (percentages) (counts) (percentages) ecology: is it valid to use vertebrate fossil records, either published or Crocodilians 256 35.3 140 36.8 housed in museum collections, to reconstruct ancient ecosystems? Pterosaurs† 24 3.3 12 3.2 Paleoecological studies based on Moroccan material are further com- Nonavian 178 24.5 57 15.0 plicated because of the widespread commercial fossil trade: many verte- theropods brates described from the Kem Kem Formation were obtained from deal- Sauropods 58 8.0 2 0.5 ers rather than fi eld collected (e.g., Novas et al., 2005). Such collections Ornithischians 14 1.9 5 1.3 Chelonians 158 21.8 194 51.1 have a positive effect on our knowledge of taxonomic richness, as they Birds§ 2 0.3 6 1.6 sample rare taxa in the right tail of the specimens:taxa curve discussed Note: Fossils comprise bones, teeth, and carapace fragments. by Koch (1998), yet biased sampling of rare taxa can produce a distorted *Some fossils counted in the fi eld were not retained; no fossils were picture of ecosystems (Goldwasser and Roughgarden, 1997). We hypoth- purchased as part of this study. esize that this collectorship effect is strongly biasing understanding of the †Fragmentary pterosaur bones and teeth from the Kem Kem Formation are referable to Ornithocheiridae, Pteranodontidae, Tapejaridae, and Azdarchidae relative proportions of taxa in Kem Kem Formation vertebrate faunas. (Barrett et al., 2009). §Fossil birds remain undescribed. An isolated vertebra reported by Riff et al. (2004) from the Kem Kem Formation exhibits no avian synapomorphies. *E-mail: [email protected]. © 2009 Geological Society of America. For permission to copy, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, or [email protected]. GEOLOGY,Geology, September September 2009; 2009 v. 37; no. 9; p. 843–846; doi: 10.1130/G30188A.1; 2 fi gures; 1 table. 843 Downloaded from geology.gsapubs.org on 30 September 2009 whether the observed relative proportions of higher taxa in shop and emphasizes the increased proportions of theropod and sauropod dinosaur fi eld data sets are drawn from the same distribution. material in the shop sample, while our fi eld sample contains a higher pro- Rarefaction was used to generate collectorship curves for the two portion of turtles and birds. faunas (“fi eld” versus “shop”) using Analytic Rarefaction 1.4 (Holland, 2003). To test whether the two collections sample from the same pool of Rarefaction and Resampling Results taxa, a resampling program was written by one of us (McGowan; available Rarefaction curves for the shop and fi eld samples have markedly dif- upon request). Resampling with replacement was used, with sampling ferent equations and shapes (Fig. 2A). It is surprising that our fi eld sample probabilities derived from the combined pool of specimens from shop and captures high diversity with fewer specimens. Note that in the central sec- fi eld (Table 1). We generated two distributions, based on 1000 replications tion of these curves, the shop samples provide higher diversity estimates, in each case: one of n = 416 (number of individuals in fi eld sample) and but at higher sample sizes the fi eld collection performs better (Fig. 2A). the other with n = 690 (number of individuals in shop samples). Results Rarefaction results indicate that fi eld data are more consistent at recover- were expressed as proportions of the total sample for comparison with ing the full suite of higher taxa present when samples with more than 100 observed proportions.
Recommended publications
  • Evidence from the Fossil Record
    Chapter 3 LESSON 1 Evidence from the Fossil Record Essential Question Pictures of the Past How are fossils used to learn about the history of To the untrained eye, fossils might look like ordinary rocks. But to a trained scientist, they are much more than that. They paint a picture life on Earth? of past organisms and environments that often look different from current organisms and environments. Warm Up When a Moroccan fossil collector showed scientist Nizar Ibrahim a box What clues about the of fossils, Ibrahim knew one of them was special. Years later he would past can you get from realize just how special it was. In 2014 the fossil collector led Ibrahim a fossil? and his team to the site where the fossil was found. It was in the middle of the Moroccan Sahara Desert. The team unearthed several more fossils. The fossils came from a dinosaur called Spinosaurus. They Vocabulary were about 100 million years old. biodiversity Spinosaurus was a large predatory dinosaur. The first Spinosaurus chordate fossils were discovered by Ernst Stromer in Egypt in 1912, but the fossils were destroyed during World War II. Since that time, Spinosaurus cyanobacteria had eluded scientists. microfossil Ibrahim and his team dug up many Spinosaurus bones. With the help paleontologist of Stromer’s original drawings, they used the bones to reconstruct the Spinosaurus skeleton. The skull was shaped like a crocodile’s, with sharp, cone-shaped teeth. Its back had a structure like a sail on top of it. Its hip bones were narrow. The bones in its feet were shaped like paddles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Spinosaurs - a Review and Revision of the Spinosauridae
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online A century of spinosaurs - a review and revision of the Spinosauridae with comments on their ecology HONE David William Elliott1, * HOLTZ Thomas Richard Jnr2 1 School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK 2 Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA Abstract: The spinosaurids represent an enigmatic and highly unusual form of large tetanuran theropods that were first identified in 1915. A recent flurry of discoveries and taxonomic revisions of this important and interesting clade had added greatly to our knowledge, however, spinosaur body fossils are generally rare and most species are known from only limited skeletal remains. Their unusual anatomical adaptations to the skull, limbs and axial column all differ from other large theropods and point to an unusual ecological niche and a lifestyle intimately linked to water. Keywords: Theropoda, Megalosauroidea, Baryonychinae, Spinosaurinae, palaeoecology E-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction The Spinosauridae is an enigmatic clade of large and carnivorous theropods from the Jurassic and Cretaceous that are known from both Gondwana and Laurasia (Holtz et al., 2004). Despite their wide temporal and geographic distribution, the clade is known primarily from teeth and the body fossil record is extremely limited (Bertin, 2010). As such, relatively little is known about this group of animals, although their unusual morphology with regard to skull shape, dentition, dorsal neural spines and other features mark them out as divergent from the essential bauplan of other non-tetanuran theropods (Fig 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Stromer 1915
    Proceedings of the Royal Bavarian Academy of Science Mathematical-physical Division Volume XXVIII, Paper 3 __________________________________ Results of Prof. E. Stromer's Research Expedition in the Deserts of Egypt II. Vertebrate Remains from the Baharîje Beds (lowermost Cenomanian) 3. The Type of the Theropod Spinosaurus aegyptiacus nov. gen., nov. spec.* by Ernst Stromer with 2 double-page plates Presented on November 6, 1915 Munich 1915 A publication of the Royal Bavarian Academy of Science in commission of G. Franz's Press (J. Roth) ===================================================================================== Translation by R.T. Zanon, 1989. * Original citation: Stromer, E. 1915. Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers in den Wüsten Ägyptens. II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharîje-Stufe (unterstes Cenoman). 3. Das Original des Theropoden Spinosaurus aegyptiacus nov. gen., nov. spec. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse 28(3):1-32. 3. The Type of the Theropod Spinosaurus aegyptiacus nov. gen., nov. spec. Three km north of Gebel el Dist, thus in the plain at the base of the Baharîje Valley and in the deepest layer "7 p" (Stromer 1914, p. 28 and 29, fn. 1), out of a small hill, from a whitish-gray to yellowish, clayey, gypsum-free sandstone, below a cover of 30 cm ferruginous sandstone and 1 m of hard clay, in Spring 1912, the collector Markgraf excavated a number of remains, lying closely together, of a large theropod, namely the two mandibular rami without the posterior ends with a few teeth in situ, a ? left angular, a little piece of the left upper jaw, over a dozen individual teeth or tooth crowns, two cervical, seven dorsal, two and a half sacral, and one anterior caudal vertebrae, many incomplete ribs and lateral gastralia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst Freiherr Stromer Von Reichenbach – Wikipedia
    Ernst Freiherr Stromer von Reichenbach – Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Freiherr_Stromer_von_Reichenbach aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie Karl Heinrich Ernst Freiherr Stromer von Reichenbach (* 12. Juni 1871 in Nürnberg; † 18. Dezember 1952 in Erlangen) war ein deutscher Paläontologe und einer der bedeutendsten Dinosaurier- Forscher. 1 Herkunft 2 Werdegang 3 Wissenschaftliche Leistungen 4 Ehrungen 5 Dokumentarfilm 6 Schriften 7 Siehe auch 8Literatur Ernst Stromer (ca. 1914) 9 Weblinks 10 Einzelnachweise Ernst Stromer von Reichenbach gehört einem Adelsgeschlecht an, das im Mittelalter zu den wichtigsten Patrizierfamilien der Reichsstadt Nürnberg gehörte. Einige Mitglieder der Familie Stromer (vorher auch Stromair und Stromeyer) fungierten als Vorderster Losunger (Verwalter der städtischen Steuern[1]) und Bürgermeister von Nürnberg. Die Familie war seit ihrer Einwanderung nach Nürnberg mit Unterbrechungen im 16. und 17. Jh. im „Inneren Rat“ von Nürnberg vertreten. Ulman Stromer (1329–1407) schrieb das früheste Werk der Nürnberger Geschichtsschreibung und gründete und betrieb die erste Papiermühle Deutschlands. Sein Halbbruder Peter Stromer erfand 1368 die Nadelwaldsaat, durch die es zum ersten Mal in der Forstwirtschaft gelang, planmäßig und in großem Ausmaß Wald anzusäen. Ab 1754 gehörte der Familie Stromer das Schloss Grünsberg in Mittelfranken. Während seines Studiums wurde er Mitglied des AGV München.[2] Ernst Stromer von Reichenbach machte sich um die Erforschung fossiler Wirbeltiere verdient. Er wirkte in Leiden/Holland (1897 Konservator an der Geologisch-Mineralogischen Abteilung des Reichsmuseums (Rijskmuseum)) und in München (1901 Habilitation, 1908 außerordentlicher Professor, 1928 Hauptkonservator und Abteilungsleiter sowie 1930 Abteilungsdirektor an der „Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie“, 1921 Honorarprofessor). 1916 wurde er zum außerordentlichen Mitglied der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften gewählt, 1921 wurde er ordentliches Mitglied der Mathematisch-physikalischen Klasse.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur (DK Eyewitness Books)
    Eyewitness DINOSAUR www.ketabha.org Eyewitness DINOSAUR www.ketabha.org Magnolia flower Armored Polacanthus skin Rock fragment with iridium deposit Corythosaurus Tyrannosaurus coprolite (fossil dropping) Megalosaurus jaw www.ketabha.org Eyewitness Troodon embryo DINOSAUR Megalosaurus tooth Written by DAVID LAMBERT Kentrosaurus www.ketabha.org LONDON, NEW YORK, Ammonite mold MELBOURNE, MUNICH, AND DELHI Ammonite cast Consultant Dr. David Norman Senior editor Rob Houston Editorial assistant Jessamy Wood Managing editors Julie Ferris, Jane Yorke Managing art editor Owen Peyton Jones Art director Martin Wilson Gila monster Associate publisher Andrew Macintyre Picture researcher Louise Thomas Production editor Melissa Latorre Production controller Charlotte Oliver Jacket designers Martin Wilson, Johanna Woolhead Jacket editor Adam Powley DK DELHI Editor Kingshuk Ghoshal Designer Govind Mittal DTP designers Dheeraj Arora, Preetam Singh Project editor Suchismita Banerjee Design manager Romi Chakraborty Troodon Iguanodon hand Production manager Pankaj Sharma Head of publishing Aparna Sharma First published in the United States in 2010 by DK Publishing 375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014 Copyright © 2010 Dorling Kindersley Limited, London 10 11 12 13 14 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 175403—12/09 All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Published in Great Britain by Dorling Kindersley Limited. A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-0-7566-5810-6 (Hardcover) ISBN 978-0-7566-5811-3 (Library Binding) Color reproduction by MDP, UK, and Colourscan, Singapore Printed and bound by Toppan Printing Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Evolution of Whales
    Early Evolution of Whales A Century of Research in Egypt Philip D. Gingerich Introduction Living whales are fully aquatic and belong to two suborders of Cetacea: Mysticeti (baleen whales) and Odontoceti (toothed whales). Both of these modern suborders appeared when Earth changed from a ‘greenhouse’ earth to an ‘icehouse’ earth at in about the beginning of the Oligocene epoch (Zachos et al., 2001). Early whales, from the ‘greenhouse’ Eocene, all belong to a distinct paraphyletic suborder Archaeoceti. Archaeocetes differ from later modern whales in retaining many characteristics of land mammals, including complexly occluding cheek teeth, ear bones well integrated with the rest of the cranium, longer necks, less specialized forelimb flippers, and hind limbs with feet and toes. Archaeocetes are, in essence, the transitional forms documenting the origin of whales from an earlier land-mammal ancestry (Gingerich, 2005). The first archaeocete fossil to be studied scientifically was a very large vertebral centrum collected in 1832 near the Ouachita River in Caldwell Parish, Louisiana. This measured some 35 cm in length and was but one of a series of 28 vertebrae found together there. The animal represented was named Basilosaurus or ‘king lizard’ because of its size and presumed reptilian heritage (Harlan, 1834). At the time the British anatomist Richard Owen was busy studying the large reptiles he eventually called dinosaurs. To solve the mystery of Basilosaurus, Owen secured additional remains and showed that it was a mammal because its cheek teeth are double-rooted. Owen (1839) deemed the name Basilosaurus to be inappropriate and proposed Zeuglodon or ‘yoked teeth’ as a replacement name.
    [Show full text]
  • Paläontologische Gesellschaft Programme, Abstracts, and Field Guides
    TERRA NOSTRA Schriften der GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung – 2012/3 Centenary Meeting of the Paläontologische Gesellschaft Programme, Abstracts, and Field Guides 24.09. – 29.09.2012 Museum für Naturkunde Berlin Edited by Florian Witzmann & Martin Aberhan Cover-Abstract.indd 1 24.08.12 15:52 IMPRINT TERRA NOSTRA – Schriften der GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung Publisher Verlag GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung Arno-Holz-Str. 14, 12165 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)30 7900660, Fax: +49 (0)30 79006612 Email: [email protected] Editorial office Dr. Christof Ellger Schriftleitung GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung Arno-Holz-Str. 14, 12165 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)30 79006622, Fax: +49 (0)30 79006612 Email: [email protected] Vol. 2012/3 Centenary Meeting of the Paläontologische Gesellschaft. Heft 2012/3 Programme, Abstracts, and Field Guides Jubiläumstagung der Paläontologischen Gesellschaft. Programm, Kurzfassungen und Exkursionsführer Editors Florian Witzmann & Martin Aberhan Herausgeber Editorial staff Faysal Bibi, George A. Darwin, Franziska Heuer, Wolfgang Kiessling, Redaktion Dieter Korn, Sarah Löwe, Uta Merkel, Thomas Schmid-Dankward Printed by Druckerei Conrad GmbH, Oranienburger Str. 172, 13437 Berlin Druck Copyright and responsibility for the scientific content of the contributions lie with the authors. Copyright und Verantwortung für den wissenschaftlichen Inhalt der Beiträge liegen bei den Autoren. ISSN 0946-8978 GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung – Berlin, September 2012 Centenary Meeting of the Paläontologische Gesellschaft Programme, Abstracts, and Field Guides 24.09. – 29.09.2012 Museum für Naturkunde Berlin Edited by Florian Witzmann & Martin Aberhan Organisers: Martin Aberhan, Jörg Fröbisch Oliver Hampe, Wolfgang Kiessling Johannes Müller, Christian Neumann Manja Voss, Florian Witzmann Table of Contents Welcome ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Dodson's Egyptian Dinosaur Adventure
    Bellwether Magazine Volume 1 Number 50 Summer 2001 Article 7 Summer 2001 Professor Dodson’s Egyptian Dinosaur Adventure Patricia R. Kane-Vanni Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/bellwether Recommended Citation Kane-Vanni, Patricia R. (2001) "Professor Dodson’s Egyptian Dinosaur Adventure," Bellwether Magazine: Vol. 1 : No. 50 , Article 7. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/bellwether/vol1/iss50/7 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/bellwether/vol1/iss50/7 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Professor Dodson’s Egyptian Dinosaur Adventure By Patricia R.Kane-Vanni,Esq. owed and filmed the project for an expected of identifiable large bones were excavated. The o one has been to the Egyptian desert television special. centerpiece was the discovery of a 5 foot, 7 inch to excavate dinosaur fossils since The trip encompassed a six-week field sea- sauropod humerus, one of the largest ever N before the First World War. In 1914 son from January through February 2000. found! There is no question that this is a major German paleontologist Dr. Ernst Stromer exca- Although it was winter, temperatures varied find. Extensive study and comparison of the vated abundant fossil fauna, including land and from the 60’s to the 80’s. The nighttime lows bones with identified species has verified that sea animals, plants and most excitingly, hovered in the 40’s. The temperatures weren’t this is an entirely new species. The name of the dinosaurs! Sadly all of these fossil treasures, so much of a factor since the team could dress new dinosaur is Parallatitan stromeri, meaning though well documented, were destroyed in an for the cold but not for the dust storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 3 July, 2020 ______
    __________The Paleontograph________ A newsletter for those interested in all aspects of Paleontology Volume 9 Issue 3 July, 2020 _________________________________________________________________ From Your Editor Welcome to our July edition. I hope this issue finds you healthy and safe. As most are, I've been staying home for the most part working around the house and my fossil workshop. I've been getting many large construction projects done with the extra time. I'm also continuing to work thru my backlog of fossils. I'm lucky in that I've only lost one friend to the virus. It's weird to say that one is lucky to have lost a friend. This whole thing is scary. I don't know why it has become so political. It's a virus. We are nearing 150,000 dead Americans. Why can't we all just wear a mask for a few weeks? Even if that does not work, how much harm is done by being a little uncomfortable, when being near others, for a few weeks? What's the big deal? I hope you enjoy the issue and stay healthy. The Paleontograph was created in 2012 to continue what was originally the newsletter of The New Jersey Paleontological Society. The Paleontograph publishes articles, book reviews, personal accounts, and anything else that relates to Paleontology and fossils. Feel free to submit both technical and non-technical work. We try to appeal to a wide range of people interested in fossils. Articles about localities, specific types of fossils, fossil preparation, shows or events, museum displays, field trips, websites are all welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecclesbourne Glen, Hastings - by Ken Brooks …………………………………………………………………
    Hastings & District Geological Society Journal Hastings and District Geological Society affiliated to the Geologists’ Association President Professor G. David Price, UCL Founded 1992 Ecclesbourne Glen in the mid 1800s - military firing range can be seen on the east side of the glen Volume 20 December 2014 Cover picture: Ecclesbourne Glen in the mid 1800s (see article on page 2) Contributions for next year’s Journal would be appreciated and should be submitted by the October 2015 meeting. Please contact Peter Austen on: tel: 01323 899237 or e-mail: [email protected] The Hastings & District Geological Society does not accept responsibility for the views expressed by individual authors in this Journal. Taxonomic/Nomenclatural Disclaimer - This publication is not deemed to be valid for taxonomic/nomenclatural purposes. CONTENTS - Vol. 20, December 2014 2014 Officials and Committee …………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Ecclesbourne Glen, Hastings - by Ken Brooks …………………………………………………………………... 2 Sussex Mineral Society goes to Maine, USA - by Trevor Devon ……………………………………………….. 5 Bexhill dinosaur - an update - by Peter and Joyce Austen ………………………………………………………. 8 Report on the visit by a group of HDGS members to the Bexhill to Hastings Link Road - by Jim Simpson …… 10 Photographs of HDGS visit behind the scenes at the Natural History Museum - June 2014 ……………………. 16 Geology of The Azores, Portugal - by Margaret A Dale ………………………………………………………… 17 Sussex Mineral Show - Saturday, 14th November 2015 ………………………………………………………… 19 200 years of William Smith’s momentous map - by Anthony Brook …………………….……………………... 20 William Smith and the Castle Hill section - by Anthony Brook …………………….…………………………... 22 Geology Group Beach Barbecue - by Kay Wilks ………………………………………………………………... 22 HDGS/GA field meeting: Covehurst Bay to Fairlight Cove, Hastings - by Ed Jarzembowski, Peter Austen and Ken Brooks ……….
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Spinosaurs - a Review and Revision of the Spinosauridae
    A century of spinosaurs - a review and revision of the Spinosauridae with comments on their ecology HONE David William Elliott1, * HOLTZ Thomas Richard Jnr2 1 School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK 2 Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA Abstract: The spinosaurids represent an enigmatic and highly unusual form of large tetanuran theropods that were first identified in 1915. A recent flurry of discoveries and taxonomic revisions of this important and interesting clade had added greatly to our knowledge, however, spinosaur body fossils are generally rare and most species are known from only limited skeletal remains. Their unusual anatomical adaptations to the skull, limbs and axial column all differ from other large theropods and point to an unusual ecological niche and a lifestyle intimately linked to water. Keywords: Theropoda, Megalosauroidea, Baryonychinae, Spinosaurinae, palaeoecology E-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction The Spinosauridae is an enigmatic clade of large and carnivorous theropods from the Jurassic and Cretaceous that are known from both Gondwana and Laurasia (Holtz et al., 2004). Despite their wide temporal and geographic distribution, the clade is known primarily from teeth and the body fossil record is extremely limited (Bertin, 2010). As such, relatively little is known about this group of animals, although their unusual morphology with regard to skull shape, dentition, dorsal neural spines and other features mark them out as divergent from the essential bauplan of other non-tetanuran theropods (Fig 1). They likely occupied different ecological niches to other theropods, as despite evidence of a broad diet (Charig & Milner, 1997; Buffetaut et al., 2004), these animals clearly spent a considerable amount of their time in and around water (Amiot et al., 2010a; Sales et al., 2016) and could be considered semi-aquatic (Ibrahim et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to a Discussion of Spinosaurus Aegyptiacus As a Capable Swimmer and Deep-Water Predator
    life Hypothesis Contributions to a Discussion of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus as a Capable Swimmer and Deep-Water Predator Jan Gimsa 1,* and Ulrike Gimsa 2 1 Department of Biophysics, University of Rostock, Gertruden Str. 11A, 18057 Rostock, Germany 2 Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Behavioural Physiology, Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-381-498-6020 Abstract: The new findings on Spinosaurus’ swim tail strongly suggest that Spinosaurus was a specialized deep-water predator. However, the tail must be seen in the context of the propelled body. The comparison of the flow characteristics of Spinosaurus with geometrically similar animals and their swimming abilities under water must take their Reynolds numbers into account and provide a common context for the properties of Spinosaurus’ tail and dorsal sail. Head shape adaptations such as the head crest reduced hydrodynamic disturbance and facilitated stealthy advance, especially when hunting without visual contact, when Spinosaurus could have used its rostral integumentary mechanoreceptors for prey detection. The muscular neck permitted ‘pivot’ feeding, where the prey’s escape abilities were overcome by rapid dorsoventral head movement, facilitated by crest-mediated lower friction. Keywords: dorsal sail; swim tail; head crest; pivot feeding; hydrodynamics; allometry; Reynolds number; submerged hunting Citation: Gimsa, J.; Gimsa, U. Contributions to a Discussion of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus as a Capable 1. Introduction Swimmer and Deep-Water Predator. Its discoverer, the German paleontologist Ernst Stromer (1871–1952), was perplexed Life 2021, 11, 889. https://doi.org/ by the large predatory dinosaur Spinosaurus aegyptiacus [1].
    [Show full text]