DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report Final 052207.Pub

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report Final 052207.Pub Criminal Court of the City of New York Annual Report 2006 Hon. Juanita Bing Newton William H. Etheridge III Administrative Judge Chief Clerk CRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Published April 2007 This Report was published by the Office of the Administrative Judge of New York City Criminal Court. Editor/Writer/Photographer Contributors Justin Barry Tara Begley Michael Yavinsky, Esq. Judith Caragine, Esq. Toy Holloway TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION Calendar Year 2006 - Executive Summary 4 NYC Criminal Court 2006 By the Numbers 4 Introduction - Administrative Judge Juanita Bing Newton 5 Criminal Court Caseload - A 10 Year Overview 6 Organizational Structure of NYC Criminal Court 6 New York City Criminal Court Judges and Supervisory Personnel 8 Courthouse Locations 9 New Initiatives and Improved Services in 2006 10 Research on Defendants’ Perceptions of Fairness 11 New Laws and Legislation 12 NYC Criminal Court Jurisdiction 30 Bronx Criminal Division 31 COURT OPERATIONS Arraignments 32 Arrest to Arraignment - The Path of the Case 38 Arrest to Arraignment - The Process 39 Arraignments - Types of Charges 40 Most Frequently Charged Offenses At Arraignments 42 Arraignment Dispositions 44 Citywide Summons Operation 46 Summonses - From Ticket to Hearing 47 Summonses - Filings, Docketing and Arraignments 48 Most Frequently Charged Summons Offenses 2006 47 Summonses - Revenue 49 Summonses - Trials 50 Plea By Mail 51 2 New York City Criminal Court 2006 Annual Report Page Pre-Trial All-Purpose Parts 52 Felony Waiver Parts 56 Comparison with Supreme Court Filings and Dispositions 60 Domestic Violence Courts 61 Spotlight Parts 62 Drug Treatment Court Initiative 63 Compliance Parts 64 Court Dispute Referral Centers 65 Trial Parts 66 Pre-Trial Hearings 67 Trials 68 Community Courts 72 Red Hook Community Justice Center 72 Midtown Community Court 74 Central Administration 76 Criminal Court Revenue 78 Criminal Court Disbursements 79 Summary Information 80 Dockets Pending 80 Citywide Dispositions 82 Calendared Cases 84 Judge Days 85 COURT NEWS New Employees and Promotions 86 2006 Employees of the Year 88 100 Centre St Lobby This report showcases some of the impressive art, architectural details and fixtures found throughout NYC Criminal Court’s nine courthouses. 3 Calendar Year 2006 - Executive Summary This report profiles the work and accomplishments for further information). of the Criminal Court of the City of New York over Here are some 2006 Criminal Court milestones : the past year. The report is divided into three sec- tions; the first part is an introduction and summary 23.99 hour average arrest-to-arraignment time of the organizational structure of the Court, the sec- 332,496* online arrest/DAT cases arraigned; ond part describes court operations - arraignments, 602,944* summons filings; all-purpose parts, trial parts and community courts 264,295 online arrest/DAT dispositions; and other specialized courtrooms, along with a de- 919,415 cases calendared; scription of the Court’s back office - the last section 519,269 cases calendared in all purpose parts; takes a look back at Court news over the past year 25,613 felony dispositions in Criminal Court felony and exciting new projects coming in 2007. This re- waiver parts compared to 21,334 dispositions in all port explains how each court operation functions corresponding four Supreme Courts, Criminal and then provides a quantitative analysis of the Term; work in an effort to give the reader a snapshot of the 856 pre-trial hearings commenced; volume and outcomes of cases over the past year. 2,117 trial verdicts (combined arrest/DAT and In 2004, the Bronx Criminal Division assumed ad- summons); ministrative responsibility over many aspects of mis- $33,909,379* in revenue; and demeanor case processing in the Bronx. For the $120,094,025* operating budget. most part we do not address statistical information relating to Bronx misdemeanor operations. There In addition to the analysis of work done by the entire are exceptions, however. We do report on sum- Criminal Court, this report also includes a descrip- mons, arraignment statistics and revenue numbers tion of new initiatives and improved services imple- in the Bronx as part of the entire Criminal Court pic- mented during the past year and the Court’s re- ture. We have also clearly marked any table or sponse to new laws and legislation and executive graph that contains Bronx statistics. (See page 31 branch initiatives, such as Operation Spotlight. NYC Criminal Court 2006 By the Numbers Budget: $120,094,025* Non-judicial personnel: 1,222 Total revenue: $33,909,379* Hearings commenced: 856 Fine revenue: $14,913,991* Court officers: 516 Bail revenue: $11,206,201* Trial verdicts (arrest cases): 504 Summons revenue: $8,210,384* Clerks: 205 Summons filings: 602,944* Judges authorized by statute: 107 Arraignments (Online/DATs): 332,496* Court Reporters: 88 Misdemeanor filings: 271,738* Court Interpreters: 61 Felony filings: 59,601* Court Attorneys: 59 Jurors serving: 4,825 Judges actually sitting: 56 Trials (summons cases): 1,613* Courthouses: 9* * Includes Bronx information 4 New York City Criminal Court 2006 Annual Report Introduction — Administrative Judge Juanita Bing Newton Greetings from the New York City Criminal Court. This year filings and resulting workloads were at an all time high. There has not been an equivalent increase in personnel, so we increasingly rely on the hard work and dedication of outstanding jurists and non-judicial personnel. We are constantly ask- ing for more and judges and staff always rise to the challenge. In recognition of their devotion, last year we profiled our non-judicial personnel in this report. For 2006 I want to profile the judges of our Court and in these pages you will find the women and men who dispensed justice on over 930,000 cases this year. We continued to grapple with the increasing amount of “quality of life” arrests but, along with the seemingly limitless quantities of misdemeanor and other petty offenses, Criminal Court also saw a reverse in the decade long trend of decreasing fel- ony filings. This year we saw the first increase in felony arrests in well over ten years. Criminal Court judges sitting in our felony waiver parts ac- tually handle more of these cases to final disposi- tion than their counterparts in the Supreme Court. Honorable Juanita Bing Newton Administrative Judge Over the course of the last fifteen years, Criminal Court has responded to the changes in arrest pat- of which we include in this report, shows that us- terns and criminal justice theory by experimenting ers of both the Red Hook courthouse and our much with new ways of processing our caseload. We larger centralized Brooklyn courthouse also re- were among the first in the state to open domestic sponded very favorably to the work of our judges violence courts and drug courts to attack age old and staff. Most believed that even in a courthouse problems in a new, meaningful way. We have that calendared over 360,000 cases each year, opened two community courts that are shining ex- cases were being handled fairly and appropriately. amples for the rest of the country and the world. What a testament to our judges and non-judicial What is not as well documented is the improve- personnel! Even in the busiest courthouses in the ments that we have made to the way that we dis- country, we never lose sight of the most important pense justice in our mainstream caseload. A recent part of our job - bringing justice to the people of study on the perception of fairness by court users this great city. at Red Hook Community Justice Center, excerpts This report discusses online arrest/Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) and forcement, and given a notice to appear in court on a future date. Unless summonses arraignments and filings. Online arrest/DAT refers to those indicated, this report groups these two types of cases together into one cases that are filed with the court subsequent to a arrest by a law enforce- category. ment officer and the filing of a formal complaint. With online arrest/DAT Summons cases are started when a law enforcement officer issues an ap- cases, the defendant is typically detained either at a local police precinct pearance ticket to a defendant with instructions to report to court on a or central booking while fingerprints are taken and a criminal history re- certain date. Typically, the defendant is not detained prior to release and port returned. Online arrest defendants are held until seen by a judge. no fingerprints are taken. A complaint is then filed with the Criminal Court DAT defendant are released after printing, at the discretion of law en- to commence the case. 5 Organizational Structure of NYC Criminal Court By statute, Criminal Court has 107 authorized the Chief Clerk of the court oversees the Court's judgeships. Each Criminal Court judge must be a staff of non-judicial personnel. Chief Clerk William resident of New York City. The judges are ap- H. Etheridge III is assisted in this task by the First pointed for terms of ten years by the Mayor of the Deputy Chief Clerk for citywide operations, Vin- City of New York. Any vacancies which occur prior cent Modica. In addition, the Chief Clerk is sup- to the expiration of a term also are filled through ported by four Borough Chief Clerks who, along appointment by the Mayor. with the supervising judges, oversee the day-to- day operations in each county - Serena Springle Many of the 107 judges appointed to the Criminal (New York), John Hayes (Kings), Brian Wynne Court have been assigned to the Criminal Term of (Queens) and Andrew Hassell (Richmond). The city- the Supreme Court in order to handle felony cases.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Onondaga County District Attorney's Office Plan
    New York State POLICE REFORM AND REINVENTION COLLABORATIVE ONONDAGA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE PLAN WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK DISTRICT ATTORNEY March 9, 2021 P a g e 1 | 61 Content Outline Executive Summary ……………………….........…..………………….………………………………………..3 Introduction to the Collaborative Process ………...………………………...………..………………………..4 Public Comments by InterFaith Works Community Forums Governor’s Executive Order 203 Accountability Goals POLICE STRUCTURE SUB-COMMITTEE ………….………………………………………..…….………9 Chief Kenton Buckner / Chief Joe Cecile, co-chair Use of Force Policy Body Worn Camera Policy No Knock Warrant Procedures POLICE/COMMUNITY RELATIONS SUB-COMMITTEE ………..……………………….……………10 Council President Helen Hudson, co-chair Citizen Review Board Procedural Justice o Right to Know Law Violence Interrupters: Reduction Intervention School Safety and Security Diversity Hiring CRIME ANALYSIS SUB-COMMITTEE ….………………………………………………..…………….…23 Sheriff Gene Conway / Chief Joe Ciciarelli, co-chair Problem Oriented Policing Hot Spots Focused Deterrence Environmental Design Role of Crime Analysis Center (CAC) TRAINING SUB-COMMITTEE ………………………………..……………..…………………..…………29 Chief Mike Crowell, co-chair Racial Bias: (Racial Justice in Policing) De-escalation: Focused deterrence o Implicit Bias Awareness Training Crisis Intervention: Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion Program ALTERNATIVES TO POLICE RESPONSE SUB-COMMITTEE …………………………………..……42 County Legislature Linda Ervin, co-chair Proper Response to Non-Criminal Calls Diversionary Programs and
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Fair and Just New York: Decriminalize Transactional Sex Frankie Herrmann
    Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal Volume 15 | Number 1 Article 2 1-1-2018 Building a Fair and Just New York: Decriminalize Transactional Sex Frankie Herrmann Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_race_poverty_law_journal Part of the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Frankie Herrmann, Building a Fair and Just New York: Decriminalize Transactional Sex, 15 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 51 (2018). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_race_poverty_law_journal/vol15/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 7 - HERMANN_MACRO.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 7/20/2018 5:28 PM Building a Fair and Just New York: Decriminalize Transactional Sex FRANKIE HERRMANN† Introduction.............................................................................................................. 57 I. How Did We Get Here? Legal and Judicial Systems in New York .................... 59 A. Why Is Sex Work Criminalized in New York? ...................................... 59 1. Prostitution has Its Roots in Inequities and a History of Harm Reduction....................................................................................... 60 2. Criminalization Came from the Advocacy of a Wealthy Few.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Problem-Solving Courts Provide New Approaches
    NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION JournalJUNE 2000 | VOL. 72 | NO. 5 PROBLEM-SOLVING COURTS PROVIDE NEW APPROACHES Inside: Custody Settlements Future Planning by Law Firms Mergers with Foreign Firms Project Exile Seat Belt Use in School Buses BOARD OF EDITORS C ONTENTS Howard F. Angione Editor-in-Chief New York’s Problem-Solving Courts Provide Queens e-mail: [email protected] Meaningful Alternatives to Traditional Remedies Susan K. Knipps and Greg Berman Rose Mary Bailly 8 Albany Judicial Roundtable—Reflections of Problem- Louis P. DiLorenzo Court Justices Syracuse Paul S. Hoffman 9 Croton-on-Hudson “Team Red Hook” Addresses Wide Range Judith S. Kaye of Community Needs New York City Alex Calabrese 14 Kenneth P. Nolan New York City View From the Bench—One More Time: Eugene E. Peckham Custody Litigation Hurts Children Binghamton Marjory D. Fields 20 Albert M. Rosenblatt Poughkeepsie Law Office Management—How Should Law Firms Sanford J. Schlesinger Respond to New Forms of Competition? New York City Stephen P. Gallagher 24 Richard N. Winfield New York City Roundtable Discussion—U.S., British and German Attorneys Reflect on Multijurisdictional Work Daniel J. McMahon Managing Editor 31 Albany e-mail: [email protected] “Project Exile” Effort on Gun Crimes Increases Need for Eugene C. Gerhart Attorneys to Give Clear Advice on Possible Sentences Editor Emeritus William Clauss and Jay S. Ovsiovitch 35 Binghamton EDITORIAL OFFICES Normal Rules on Liability for Failure to Use Seat One Elk Street Belts May Not Apply in School Bus Accidents Albany, NY 12207 Montgomery Lee Effinger 41 (518) 463-3200 FAX (518) 463-8844 ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVE D EPARTMENTS Network Publications President’s Message _______________ 5 Language Tips ____________________ 54 Editor’s Mailbox __________________ 43 by Gertrude Block Sheri Fuller Meet Your New Officers____________ 44 Classified Notices _________________ 56 10155 York Road, Suite 205 Tax Techniques____________________ 48 New Members Welcomed __________ 58 Crestridge Corporate Center by Arthur D.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 37, No. 2 Office Ofa M Rketing and Communications
    Masthead Logo digitalcommons.nyls.edu NYLS Publications New York Law School Alumni Magazine 3-2019 New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 37, No. 2 Office ofa M rketing and Communications Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/alum_mag Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Law Commons Office of Marketing and Communications 185 West Broadway MAGAZINE • 2019 • VOL. 37, NO. 2 New York, NY 10013-2921 SEEKG N FRIDAY, MAY 3 2019 JUST C E ALUMNI How NYLS Trains 21st-Century Prosecutors CELEBRATION MARK YOUR CALENDARS! The 2019 Alumni Celebration is shaping up to be an extraordinary occasion for the entire NYLS community—and we’ll honor classes ending in 4 and 9. You won’t want to miss it! Do you want to make sure your class is well represented at the celebration? www.nyls.edu/celebration Email [email protected] to join your class committee. WE ARE NEW YORK’S LAW SCHOOL SINCE 1891 NO. 8 OF 30 NO. 23 among SPOTLIGHT “Top Schools for Legal international law programs Technology” by preLaw in the 2019 U.S. News & WE ARE NEW YORK’S LAW SCHOOL ON magazine. World Report rankings. RECENT NO. 30 among part-time programs in the ONE OF 50 2019 U.S. News & World PROGRESS HONOREES—and one Report rankings. of 10 law schools in the nation—recognized by the Council on Legal Education AND A TOP SCHOOL Opportunity, Inc. for outstanding commitment to for Alternative Dispute diversity as a legal educator. Resolution, Business RECOGNITION Law, Criminal Law, Family Law, Human Rights Law, Intellectual Property Law, Public Interest Law, Tax Law, Technology Law, and Trial Advocacy—plus, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Attorney Access for the Criminal Records and Information System Court Locations
    Attorney Access for the Criminal Records and Information System Court Locations Court Location New York City Criminal Courts Bronx Criminal Court 215 East 161 Street, Room 1-1a Bronx, New York 10451 Kings Criminal Court 120 Schermerhorn Street, Central Clerk’s Office Brooklyn, New York 11201 New York Criminal Court 100 Centre Street, Room 134 New York, New York 10013 Queens Criminal Court 125-01 Queens Blvd., Security Night Court Entrance Kew Gardens, New York 11415 Richmond Criminal Court 67 Targee Street, 1st Floor Entrance Staten Island, New York 10301 Midtown Community Court 314 W. 54th Street, CourtRoom Well New York, New York 10019 New York Criminal Court - Summons 346 Broadway, Room 127 Part New York, New York 10013 New York City Supreme Courts Bronx Supreme Court 851 Grand Concourse, 1st Floor Clerk’s Office Bronx, New York 10451 Kings Supreme Court 360 Adams Street, 10th Floor Info Desk Brooklyn, New York 11201 New York Supreme Court 100 Centre Street, Room 1000 New York, New York 10013 111 Centre Street, Room 927 New York, New York 10013 Queens Supreme Court 125-01 Queens Blvd., 7th Fl. Law Library Kew Gardens, New York 11415 125-01 Queens Blvd., 7th Fl. Record Room Kew Gardens, New York 11415 Court Location Richmond Supreme 18 Richmond Terrace, Outside of Room 204 Staten Island, New York 10301 8th District Buffalo City Court 50 Delaware Avenue, lst Floor Records Room Buffalo, New York 14202 Erie County Court 25 Delaware Avenue, Chief Clerk’s Office Buffalo, New York 14202 9th District Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street, 3rd Floor Chief Clerk Area Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Orange County Supreme Court Orange County Government Center, 3rd Floor Chief Clerk Area 255 Main Street Goshen, New York 10924 Putnam County Supreme Court County Office Building, 2nd Floor Law Library 40 Gleneida Avenue Carmel, New York 10512 Rockland County Supreme Court 1 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining San Francisco's Community Justice Center and Evaluating Its Prospects for Success Todd W
    Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal Volume 6 Article 2 Number 1 Winter 2008 1-1-2008 Challenges of Tough Love: Examining San Francisco's Community Justice Center and Evaluating Its Prospects for Success Todd W. Daloz Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_race_poverty_law_journal Part of the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Todd W. Daloz, Challenges of Tough Love: Examining San Francisco's Community Justice Center and Evaluating Its Prospects for Success, 6 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 55 (2008). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_race_poverty_law_journal/vol6/iss1/2 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHALLENGES OF TOUGH LOVE: Examining San Francisco's Community Justice Center and Evaluating Its Prospects for Success TODD W. DALOZ* Introduction In the space of a few blocks, walking from the local subway station to San Francisco's City Hall, a tourist or daily commuter is guaranteed to pass someone panhandling or begging for spare change, a violation of San Francisco Police Code sec. 120-2. Extending the walk a bit further, past the home of the California Supreme Court or the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, you will certainly come across a few souls who have claimed a stretch of the sidewalk or the entryway of a store as their home for the night, thus potentially violating San Francisco Police Code section 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Community Court
    BUILDING A O ~ ii COMMUNITY COURT I N 1. R (O I.) U s II 0 N " ~HIS CATALOG OFFERS TOOLS, advice and resources about community courts. What are community courts? Community courts harken back to a bygone era, when courthouses stood at the center of the village green. Like the courts e of yesterday, community courts embrace old- fashioned notions of accountability, tying a cr~me to its consequences, and lending a helping hand to those in need. Community courts are located in neighborhoods rather than centralized office complexes. More important than their location is their philosophy: community courts take an aggressive approach to solving neighborhood problems like vandalism, landlord-tenant disputes, juvenile delinquency and drugs, e Colllnltlniry cotlrts use the authority of the justice system to restore neighborhoods that have been victimized by crime, neglect or disorder. They encourage greater citizen involvement, asking local residents and merchants to identify and prioritize neigh- borhood hot spots and eyesores. And they b,'ing an array of new partners into the justice system -- mediators, drug counselo,'s, :o k ,d!d doctors, teachers, employment specialists -- transforming the court into a hub for social services. What's the point? Why would anyone want to spend the time and energy and money to build one of these new courts? The answer is simple: community courts have proven effective in addressing quality-of-life problems and improving public confidence in justice. The first such court was the Midtown Com- mu,3itv Court in New York. Since Midtown opened in 1993, a number of other states have picked tip on the idea-- from Florida to Oregon, from Pennsylvania to Colorado i';.~;'.~.~ ~o.
    [Show full text]
  • "Balancing Your Strengths Against Your Felonies": Considerations for Military Recruitment of Ex-Offenders
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2007 "Balancing Your Strengths against Your Felonies": Considerations for Military Recruitment of Ex-Offenders Michael Boucai University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Michael Boucai, "Balancing Your Strengths against Your Felonies": Considerations for Military Recruitment of Ex-Offenders, 61 U. Miami L. Rev. 997 (2007). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/67 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Miami Law Review VOLUME 61 JULY 2007 NUMBER 4 ARTICLES "Balancing Your Strengths Against Your Felonies": Considerations for Military Recruitment of Ex-Offenders MICHAEL BOUCAI* I. INTRODUCTION .... ...................................................... 997 II. THE MORAL W AIVER SYSTEM ......................................... 1001 A. Substantive Laws and Policies Governing the Moral Waiver System ..... 1001 B. Moral Waiver Procedure: The Practice and Efficacy of Character Screening ....................................................... 1006 C. Moral Waivers: The Numbers ...................................... 1011 Il. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT OF Ex-OFFENDERS .... 1015 A. Ex-Offender Enlistment, Recruit Quality, and Servicemember Attrition .... 1015 B. Social Policy Considerations....................................... 1018 1. THE RECRUIT POOL ............................................ 1019 2. WHY ENLIST? - THE EX-OFFENDER'S SITUATION ....................... 1021 3.
    [Show full text]
  • NIU College of Law Library
    Article 10 Page 1 of 6 NIU College of Law Library LegalTrac @- Article 10 of 38 -@ n Trial, March 1999 v35 i3 p14(1) Mark Community courts reach out to put a dent in petty crime. (Brief Article) Julie Brienza. Full Text: COPYRIGHT 1999 Association of Trial Lawyers of America Specialized criminal courts geared to everyone from drug defendants to domestic violence and housing code offenders have sprung up around the country in recent years, but anew breed of court--the community court--is beginning to emerge in several cities. The first of its kind, the Midtown Community Court in the Times Square area of Manhattan, is celebrating five years of existence and a handful of awards for its progressive approach to dealing with misdemeanor "quality of life" crimes that play out along Broadway and its environs. The hallmark of the court is its focus on bringing misdemeanor criminal proceedings, social services, and community group activities under one roof. "You don't have to be a brain surgeon to know that the court system is not working as well as it could," said Greg Herman, deputy director of Center for Court Innovation, the research and development arm of the New York State court system that created the Midtown Community Court. "The courts are a tough institution to reform. They are built on tradition." In 1993, the center designed a new court to handle arraignments for misdemeanor crimes, such as prostitution, illegal vending, graffiti, shoplifting, and turnstilejumping in the city's subway system--crimes Berman said hurt the quality of life for pedestrians, shopkeepers,and residents of the Times Square neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Community Justice | 1
    A Guide for Community Court Planners author year about this publication Greg Berman 2010 This report was supported by the Bureau of Justice Assistance under Director grant number 2009-DC-BX-K018 awarded to the Center for Court Center for Court Innovation Innovation. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs, which also This document builds on an earlier includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of version (1997) drafted with the help of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, John Feinblatt. the Office for Victims of Crime, the Community Capacity Development Office, and the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking. Points of view or opinions in this document do not necessarily represent the official positions or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY JUSTICE | 1 PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY JUSTICE: A GUIDE FOR COMMUNITY COURT PLANNERS Instead of focusing exclusively on reacting after the fact to individual crimes and offenders, many criminal jus- ticeINTRODUCTION agencies have begun to think more broadly about how to improve public safety and the quality of life in crime-plaguedLorem ipsum dolor neighborhoods. sit amet, consectetuer This process adipiscing began in elit,the sedfield diam of policing. nonummy Starting nibh aeuismod little more tincidunt than a ut genera- tionlaoreet ago, dolore several magna overlapping aliquam reform erat volutpat. movements Ut wisi emerged: enim ad broken minim windows veniam, policing, quis nostrud community exerci tation policing, ullam and- problem-orientedcorper suscipit lobortis policing.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future Readiness of the Army and Marine Corps
    S. HRG. 110–166 CURRENT AND FUTURE READINESS OF THE ARMY AND MARINE CORPS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION FEBRUARY 15, 2007 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 38–324 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 15:08 Oct 23, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\38324.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia JOHN WARNER, Virginia, JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma JACK REED, Rhode Island JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada E. BENJAMIN NELSON, Nebraska SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia EVAN BAYH, Indiana LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York ELIZABETH DOLE, North Carolina MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas JOHN CORNYN, Texas JIM WEBB, Virginia JOHN THUNE, South Dakota CLAIRE McCASKILL, Missouri MEL MARTINEZ, Florida RICHARD D. DEBOBES, Staff Director MICHAEL V. KOSTIW, Replublican Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 15:08 Oct 23, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 C:\DOCS\38324.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: JUNEB C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF WITNESSES CURRENT AND FUTURE READINESS OF THE ARMY AND MARINE CORPS FEBRUARY 15, 2007 Page Schoomaker, GEN Peter J., USA, Chief of Staff, United States Army; Accom- panied by LTG Stephen M.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Relationship Between Moral Waivers and Marine Corps Unsuitability Attrition
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2008-03 Determining the relationship between moral waivers and Marine Corps unsuitability attrition Jeppe, Adam L. Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MORAL WAIVERS AND MARINE CORPS UNSUITABILITY ATTRITION by Adam L Jeppe March 2008 Thesis Advisor: Elda Pema Second Reader: Bill Hatch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2008 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Determining the Relationship Between Moral Waivers 5. FUNDING NUMBERS and Marine Corps Unsuitability Attrition 6. AUTHOR(S) Jeppe, Adam L. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9.
    [Show full text]