DOCSLIB.ORG

Valley MPO Long Range Regional Transportation Plan 2015-2040

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Valley MPO Long Range Regional Transportation Plan 2015-2040 Regional Transportation Plan for the Valley Planning Region: 2015 - 2040 Prepared by: Valley Council of Governments April 2015 Acknowledgements Valley Council of Governments Board The long range transportation plan for the Valley planning region The Honorable David Cassetti, Mayor, City of Ansonia was prepared by the Valley Council of Governments in cooperation The Honorable Anita Dugatto, Mayor, City of Derby with member municipalities and the Valley Transit District. It was The Honorable W. Kurt Miller, First Selectman, Town of Seymour completed under the VCOG’s FY 2015 Unified Planning Work The Honorable Mark Lauretti, Mayor, City of Shelton Program and funded through the UPWP by the US Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration), Connecticut Department of Transportation and Staff member municipalities. The findings and conclusions expressed in the report are those of the VCOG and do not reflect the official views Rick Dunne, Executive Director of CTDOT or the USDOT. Mark Nielsen, Director of Planning Mark Pandolfi, Transit Capital Adminsitrator/ General Manager, VTD Yi Ding, Transportation Planner Sources of copies Clare Falcha, Finance Director Jan Jadach, Administrative Assistant Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments 49 Leavenworth Street, Suite 303 Waterbury, Connecticut Phone: (203) 757-0535 Website: www.nvcogct.org Date May 1, 2015 For more information For more information about the VCOG’s transportation planning process and the update of the long range transportation plan, please visit the VCOG’s website at: www.nvcogct.org Page | i Abstract for the region needs to be approved and in place by May 1, 2015. The new LRTP covers a timeframe beginning in 2015 and ending in The Valley Council of Governments (VCOG) is a multi-discipline, 2040, a 25-year planning horizon. regional planning organization with four member communities. The The long range plan reflects the future transportation needs of the VCOG is the federally designated transportation planning agency for Valley planning region and includes recommended actions, programs the Valley Planning Region and conducts the transportation planning and projects to improve, enhance and better manage and operate process in ac cordance with federal regulations, including planning the public transit and highway systems, promote alternative modes, guidelines provided in MAP-21. It also serves as the transportation accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians, consider other non-motor- planning agency for the Greater Bridgeport and Valley Metropolitan ized modes of transportation, provide freight mobility and mitigate Planning Organization (MPO). The MAP-21 requires the preparation environmental impacts. It also adheres to the six livability principles and update of a long range transportation plan (LRTP) for the region established by the US DOT, HUD and EPA. The proposed actions are at least every four years. The LRTP, among many requirements: intended to accommodate existing travel, make the current transportation system more efficient, meet growing travel • Must have at least a 20-year planning horizon. requirements and improve mobility within the area. • Must be multi-modal, in that all modes must be considered – highway, public transit, bicycle and pedestrian. The recommended plan actions focus on the preservation and • Provide opportunities for the public to participate in the maintenance of the essential systems and services in the region and planning process. better operations and management of systems. There is also an • Follow a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive (3-Cs) emphasis on expanding the use of alternative transportation modes, planning process for making transportation investment as well as, on various non-traditional programs. A critical focus decisions. of the new plan is to realize a link between transportation and land use planning. • Be financially constrained, that is, there must be a reasonable expectation that funds will be available to implement the proposed projects. The LRTP was last updated and endorsed by the MPO in 2011 and, in order to fully comply with MAP-21 planning guidelines, a new LRP Page | ii Page | iii Page | iv Page | v Page | vi Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................ i Alternate Modes of Transportation ........................................... 24 Abstract ......................................................................................... ii Waterbury Branch Commuter Rail Line ..................................... 25 GBVMPO Endorsements .............................................................. iii Transit Oriented Development ................................................... 31 The Valley Planning Region .......................................................... 1 Complete Streets Policy ............................................................. 35 Greater Bridgeport-Valley MPO ................................................... 3 Federal Transportation Funding Programs ................................ 38 Transportation Planning Process ................................................. 5 Recommended Transportation Improvement Projects ............. 41 Environmental Justice ................................................................ 10 Air Quality Conformity Determination ....................................... 51 Public Involvement and Outreach ............................................. 11 Financial Assessment .................................................................. 55 Transportation System ............................................................... 13 Transportation Issues ................................................................. 15 Transportation Goals ................................................................ 18 Air Quality Goals ........................................................................ 20 Sustainable Communities Initiative ........................................... 21 Locally Coordinated Human Services Transportation Program. 23 Page | vii The Valley Planning Region Dense residential developments were also built to provide work force housing in proximity of the manufacturing plants. Businesses The Valley planning region is located in southwestern Connecticut and manufacturing plants were located in town centers and the midway between three of the largest cities in Connecticut: the City downtown areas became the focal points for residents and met all of of Bridgeport to the south, the City of New Haven to the east, and their essential needs. the City of Waterbury to the north. It straddles the boundary between Fairfield and New Haven Counties. The geographic area of The geography of the area further defined the region as the steep the region is relatively small at about 58 square miles. The combined slopes along the rivers confined the town centers and created population of the region is 88,545 people (2013 ACS). The compact downtowns that limited opportunities for expansion. combination of population and area results in a population density However, this land patterns resulted in downtowns that had an of 1,516.2 persons per square mile, indicating a fairly densely settled intimate scale. and intensely developed area. The Valley Region is located wholly within the Census-defined Bridgeport-Stamford Urban Area and The Valley Region has a long and rich history in transportation. As an 100% of its residents live in the urban area. early river port and a major manufacturing center of Connecticut, the area has capitalized on multi-modal opportunities for more than The Valley planning region is comprised of four lower Naugatuck 100 years. The area benefits from the confluence of the Housatonic Valley communities: and Naugatuck Rivers. The Housatonic River, a navigable waterway • City of Ansonia, from Long Island Sound to Derby, functioned as a means of goods • City of Derby, transport. Cargo ships would travel up and down the river and meet • Town of Seymour and the trains at the East Derby Transfer Point. • City of Shelton. Before the proliferation of the automobile, the Waterbury rail line Historically, the region supported a robust manufacturing economy was the dominant mode of transportation. The rail service provided based on its location along the Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers and intercity and inter-regional passenger, as well as freight, access to waterpower and waterborne transportation. During the connections. The region was also one of the earliest areas to develop peak period of manufacturing, the region developed the trolley lines for localized travel. The trolley system also connected infrastructure to support the manufacturing sector, including public the region to New Haven. water supply, sanitary sewers and transportation infrastructure. Page | 1 The expansion of the road network following World War II changed the character of the region. Manufacturing businesses began to relocate to areas with less expensive operating costs and residents began to shift their travel to other communities for shopping and social activities. The construction of Route 8 as an limited access expressway in the early 1960s provided an efficient and convenient means to travel to other areas. As a result, the downtown areas declined and were transformed from vibrant communities. These areas are now under-populated and contain Brownfields; however, they retain well-developed infrastructure and are served by both bus and rail. The area was further
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beacon Falls URBITRANR EPORT
    Individual Station Report Beacon Falls URBITRANR EPORT CONTENTS: Stakeholder Interview Customer Opinion Survey Parking Inventory & Utilization Station Condition Inspection Lease Narrative and Synopsis Station Operations Review Station Financial Review URBITRAN Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. July 2003 June 2003 June 2003 June 2003 June 2003 June 2003 June 2003 Stakeholder Interview URBITRANR EPORT URBITRAN Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. Waterbury Branch All communities except for Naugatuck were represented during the stakeholder process, although Waterbury was represented by the Chamber of Commerce and Ansonia by the Valley Regional Planning Agency. Waterbury The Chamber of Commerce was designated by the Mayor as the representative for these discussions. The first issue that was raised concerned the parking lot, and the lack of clear directions regarding what is city parking for the station and what is SNET parking. The lot itself is unpaved and poorly marked. There is no lease between the City and CDOT for the station or parking lot, and the City has no responsibilities regarding them. The Chamber representatives stated that they could not speak to policy issues and the City’s attitude towards the station or rail service except in general terms. In that regard, the basic desire is to have more service on the Waterbury branch, and to construct a new intermodal terminal for buses and rail in the city. There is a study underway for such a facility, and site locations as they impact on local businesses and the transit network are currently under review.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting
    Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting March 2019 Members S. Metzger N. Brown R. Glucksman C. Moerdler M. Pally A. Saul V. Vanterpool N. Zuckerman Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 3/25/2019 8:30 - 9:30 AM ET 1. Public Comments 2. Approval of Minutes Minutes - Page 4 3. 2019 Work Plan 2019 MNR Work Plan - Page 14 4. President's Reports Safety MNR Safety Report - Page 22 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 25 5. Information Items MNR Information Items - Page 31 Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies - Page 32 Annual Elevator & Escalator Report Annual Elevator & Escalator Report - Page 66 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Results - Page 74 PTC Status Report PTC Status Report - Page 122 Lease Agreement for Hastings Station Lease Agreement for Hastings Station - Page 133 License agreement for Purdy's Station License Agreement for Purdy's Station - Page 135 6. Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 137 MNR Non-Competitive Procurements MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 140 MNR Competitive Procurements MNR Competitive Procurements - Page 142 7. Operations Report MNR Operations Report - Page 149 8. Financial Report MNR Finance Report - Page 160 9. Ridership Report MNR Ridership Report - Page 181 10. Capital Program Report MNR Capital Program Report - Page 192 Next Meeting: Joint meeting with Long Island on Monday, April 15th @ 8:30 a.m. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Metro-North Committee Monday, February 25, 2019 Meeting held at 2 Broadway – 20th Floor New York, New York 10004 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 PCAC Annual Report
    Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee Long Island Rail Road Commuters’ Council Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council New York City Transit Riders Council PCAC In 2000, the PCAC gained several new faces, honored its own, and said good-bye to old PCAC Executive friends. In June, the PCAC awarded longtime MNRCC member Robert Schumacher a Committee plaque for a lifetime of dedication to public transportation. In December, the PCAC mourned Barbara the passing of esteemed MNRCC member Martin Goldstein, who freely gave of his time to Josepher many public-service causes beyond the PCAC and will be greatly missed. Earlier in the Chair year, former Associate Director Jonathan Sigall left the PCAC for a position with the Long Island Rail Road. Transportation Planner Mike Doyle was promoted to Associate Director, Stephen F. and the PCAC welcomed its new Transportation Planner Joshua Schank. Research Wilder Associate Sarah Massey also moved on to pursue a full-time position at West Harlem First Vice Chair Environmental Action. James F. Blair Acting Second Throughout 2000, the PCAC concentrated on the MTA 2000-2004 capital plan, approved by Vice Chair New York State's Capital Program Review Board in the spring, and on the State Transportation Bond Act, which ultimately was rejected by voters. The PCAC and staff dis- Andrew Albert cussed these issues on several occasions with MTA Budget Director Gary Caplan, Grants Director Gregory Kullberg, and Planning Director William Wheeler, consistently voicing con- Richard cern over the capital plan's heavy reliance on debt and the level of debt service that will be Cataggio present in outlying years.
    [Show full text]
  • Ansonia Train Station
    ANSONIA TRAIN STATION VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT January 2007 Prepared by the Bureau of Public Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation Ansonia Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Overview: The Ansonia Train Station is a small rail stop located on West Main Street in downtown Ansonia, one block from Main Street (Route 334). Storefronts line the street opposite the station. Across the track is the Naugatuck River floodwall and floodgate, which are pleasantly clear of graffiti. Between the wall and the tracks is an abandoned roadway with an old wooden post guide rail. Weeds have overtaken the old pavement. The platform area consists of a wooden box and an old wooden canopy on bituminous pavement. A Plexiglas glass shelter sits nearby on a concrete pad. Shrubs obscure the shelter from the street. Several large trees shade the adjacent street. Paths to and from the station use city sidewalks and are illuminated by streetlights. This is small station whose ridership is less than 100 commuters per weekday. Weekend numbers may equal or exceed the average weekday ridership. While only a minor facelift to the canopy and immediate area will make this a more attractive rail stop, ridership numbers will likely not increase until commuter service is perceived to be more reliable. Maintenance Responsibilities: Owner: CDOT Operator: CDOT Platform Lights: Metro-North Power Department Trash: Metro-North Operations Services (Stations) Snow Removal: Metro-North Track Department Shelter Glazing: CDOT Platform Canopy: CDOT Platform Structure: CDOT Parking: Municipality Page 2 Ansonia Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Station Layout: Aerial Photo by Aero-Metric, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbury Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007
    WATERBURY TRAIN STATION VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT January 2007 Prepared by the Bureau of Public Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation Waterbury Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Overview: The Waterbury Train Station is located near the city’s central business district. Adjacent to the facility is the old Union Station, now owned and occupied by the Waterbury Republican newspaper. Its 245-foot bell tower provides a landmark for locating the station. Using local roads to access the facility is not as easy due to a lack of trailblazing. Upon arriving at the station, one may have trouble locating the parking lot entrance, which is located several hundred feet south. A station sign has been placed at the entrance. The drive is partially obscured by a bank building and its poorly situated exit, which is only several feet from the parking lot driveway. The station itself consists of a short high- level platform, a ramp, two shelters and a parking lot. The station area is clean with only an occasional tossed item. However, the area across from the platform consists of abandoned tracks and railroad debris. The shelters are clean with benches. A recycling bin is located next to the shelters. Between the station and Meadow Street are an abandoned parking structure and vacant office building. The old driveway behind the platform is barricaded against use by commuters. A kiosk is situated at the north end of the platform. Maintenance Responsibilities: Owner: CDOT Operator: CDOT Platform Lights: Metro-North Trash: Metro-North Snow Removal: Metro-North Shelter Glazing: CDOT Platform Canopy: CDOT Platform Structure: CDOT Parking: City Page 2 Waterbury Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Station Layout: Aerial Photo by Aero-Metric, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)
    NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) JUNE 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 COMMON GOALS AND THEMES................................................................................................... 2 2.1 | Goals Identification ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 | Theme Identification ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 | Gap Identification......................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Geographic Coverage......................................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Modal Coverage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Gaps in Coordination ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut State Rail Plan, 2012
    DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 1 DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ State of Connecticut Department of Transportation 2012-2016 Connecticut State Rail Plan Prepared by: BUREAU OF PUBLIC TRANSPORATION, OFFICE OF RAIL CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 50 UNION AVENUE, FOURTH FLOOR WEST NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06519 Page 2 DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 1 – STATE RAIL VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES .............................. 9 1.1 MISSION STATEMENT, VISION, AND VALUES ........................................................................ 9 1.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR RAIL SERVICE IN CONNECTICUT ..................................... 10 CHAPTER 2 – FEDERAL AND STATE MANDATES .................................................. 13 2.1 FEDERAL LEGISLATION AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 14 2.2 STATE LEGISLATION AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS ..................................................... 15 CHAPTER 3 – DESCRIPTION OF RAIL SYSTEM IN CONNECTICUT ....................... 18
    [Show full text]
  • Safety of Grade-Level Railroad Crossings
    A REPORT BY THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER Alan G. Hevesi COMPTROLLER METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD AND METRO-NORTH RAILROAD SAFETY OF GRADE-LEVEL RAILROAD CROSSINGS 2004-S-63 DIVISION OF STATE SERVICES OSC Management Audit reports can be accessed via the OSC Web Page: http://www.osc.state.ny.us If you wish your name to be deleted from our mailing list or if your address has changed, contact the State Audit Bureau at (518) 474-3271 or at the Office of the State Comptroller 110 State Street 11th Floor Albany, NY 12236 Alan G. Hevesi COMPTROLLER Report 2004-S-63 Mr. Peter Kalikow Chairman Metropolitan Transportation Authority 347 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 Dear Mr. Kalikow: The following is our audit report addressing the actions taken by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority regarding safety at grade-level railroad crossings of the Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad. This audit was performed pursuant to the State Comptroller’s authority as set forth in Article X, Section 5 of the State Constitution. Major contributors to this report are listed in Appendix A. Office of the State Comptroller Division of State Services June 14, 2006 Division of State Services 110 STATE STREET ♦ ALBANY, NEW YORK 12236 123 WILLIAM STREET ♦ NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10038 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD AND METRO-NORTH RAILROAD SAFETY OF GRADE-LEVEL RAILROAD CROSSINGS SCOPE OF AUDIT he Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) provides public transportation Tin the New York City metropolitan area. The MTA has two commuter railroads: the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR), running between New York City and Long Island, and Metro-North Railroad (Metro-North), running between New York City and upstate New York and Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Kisco to Grand Central Train Schedule
    Mount Kisco To Grand Central Train Schedule Where'er shouting, Locke ringing temptresses and adhering yales. Ingram still surceases evanescently while procryptic Jean-Luc misrate that hendiadys. Thirteenth and trippant Travis eschews her exports breaches paraphrastically or overdosed extenuatingly, is Reed invested? Waterbury branch level service are the mount kisco. Owners who should do removing trees and mount kisco, repair project on food, mount kisco to grand central train schedule grand central terminal from danbury and airport is closest to. Off the schedule central terminal city and are called the busiest stations, harlem line train schedule. Lowered into action to and from harlem train does the oak point yard, city in a few hundred yards of journey, mount kisco to grand central train schedule from grand central! Expensive and mount kisco, rockland and port washington branch. Nys executive order to grand central trains until mount kisco. Once was to grand central trains stopping at. Family were attracted to schedule from grand city and mount kisco was completed a home value that information when does the train equipment and mount kisco to grand central train schedule from grand central? Click here on this was short and mount kisco was extended area, mount vernon west to find the port jervis and mount kisco to grand central train schedule grand central, copy and any other times. Customers are several print publications including the trains. The schedule from grand central terminal in the stations were not the harlem schedule on all stops to perform critical substations along the peak hours on. Functional and schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • WATERBURY and NEW CANAAN BRANCH LINES NEEDS and FEASIBILITY STUDY Project 170-2562
    CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bureau of Policy and Planning Intermodal Planning WATERBURY AND NEW CANAAN BRANCH LINES NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Project 170-2562 Phases I and II Waterbury and New Canaan Branches Innovative Technologies Report Date: April 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i 1.0 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Innovative Technologies ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Rail Vehicles .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Waterbury Branch ................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 New Canaan Branch............................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Track and Grade Crossings .................................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 Track Design........................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.2 Grade Crossings ..................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Train Control .......................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3.1 Block Signaling ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Metro-North Railroad Committee March 2018
    Meeting of the Metro-North Railroad Committee March 2018 Members S. Metzger N. Brown R. Glucksman C. Moerdler J. Molloy M. Pally A. Saul V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 3/19/2018 8:30 - 9:30 AM ET 1. Public Comments 2. Approval of Minutes Minutes - Page 4 3. 2018 Work Plan 2018 MNR Work Plan - Page 12 4. President's Reports Safety MNR Safety Report - Page 20 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 22 5. Action Item MNR Action Item - Page 28 Extension of Refund Period for Railroad Tickets Extension of Refund Period of Railroad Tickets - Page 29 6. Information Items MNR Information Items - Page 31 Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies - Page 32 Annual Elevator & Escalator Report Annual Escalator & Elevator Report - Page 62 2017 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results 2017 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results - Page 73 PTC Status Report PTC Status Report - Page 118 7. Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 132 Non-Competitive MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 136 Competitive MNR Competitive Procurements - Page 142 8. Operations Report MNR Operations Report - Page 146 9. Financial Report MNR Finance Report - Page 155 10. Ridership Report MNR Ridership Report - Page 175 11. Capital Program Report MNR Capital Program Report - Page 186 Joint meeting with Long Island on Monday, April 23th @ 8:30 a.m. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Metro-North Committee Monday, February 20, 2018 Meeting held at 2 Broadway – 20th Floor New York, New York 10004 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Transportation Infrastructure Priorities Naugatuck Valley Planning Region – February 2019
    Federal Transportation Infrastructure Priorities Naugatuck Valley Planning Region – February 2019 Federal Transportation Infrastructure Priorities: Naugatuck Valley Planning Region – February 2019 National Policy Initiatives: • Continue to use performance-based criteria for discretionary grant program decisions. • Ensure Highway Trust Fund solvency. Near-term solvency can be achieved by increasing and indexing existing federal fuel taxes, but a • Directly allocate STBG Program funds to MPOs of all sizes. Enhance long term solution needs to be studied and implemented. authority of MPOs to set regional spending priorities. • Remove the federal tolling prohibition. Tolling can raise funds to improve • Directly allocate all STBGP set-aside funds (formerly the Transportation and rebuild the aging Interstate and non-interstate expressway system. Alternative Program) to MPOs of all sizes and end the ability of state States, in consultation with impacted metropolitan areas, should decide DOTs to transfer set-aside funds to other programs. whether tolling is appropriate, • Permit MPOs in Connecticut to be designated based on Council of • Increase funding for transportation planning. Effective planning crafts Government boundaries and be considered Urban Area equivalents for solutions that address a variety of needs within the transportation transportation funding and programs. This would not cause any increase system. MPOs need sufficient funding to assess an increasingly in funding, but it would generate greater efficiencies in the way that complex array of activities, including more planning based on funding is programmed and distributed in the state. performance-based criteria. State Policy Initiatives: • Increase funding for the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP). • Maintain and provide full annual funding for the Local Transportation Capital Improvement Program (LOTCIP) • Increase funding for all forms of transportation.
    [Show full text]