DOCSLIB.ORG

Bighorn Basin Water Supply and Utilization Report Wyoming Area Office Report for March 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bighorn Basin Water Supply and Utilization Report Wyoming Area Office Report for March 2021 Bighorn Basin Water Supply and Utilization Report Wyoming Area Office Report for March 2021 The Wyoming Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation is responsible for the operation of Reclamation reservoirs in Wyoming east of the Continental Divide except for Keyhole Reservoir. Four off-stream reservoirs in Nebraska commonly referred to as the Inland Lakes also fall within the Wyoming Area. The North Platte River Basin Reservoirs have a combined storage capacity of 2,800,000 acre-feet. The major reservoirs in the Shoshone and Wind/Bighorn Basins have a combined storage capacity of 1,600,000 acre-feet. United States of America Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation P.O. Box 1630 Mills, Wyoming 82644-1630 Report for March 2021 WATER SUPPLY AND UTILIZATION REPORT BIGHORN RIVER BASIN WYOMING AREA OFFICE This report concerns the operation of Reclamation facilities in the Shoshone and Wind/Bighorn River Basins. Reclamation defines a water year as the time period of October 1 through September 30. Water year is abbreviated in this report as W. Yr. Other organizations furnished information for the Water Supply and Utilization Report. Their cooperation is greatly appreciated. This report is available on the Internet and can be accessed by following these steps: 1. Log on to the Great Plains Home Page at http://www.usbr.gov/gp 2. Select Water Operations. 3. Select Water Management Information. 4. Select Water Supply Report. 5. Under Bighorn Basin, select the current report or reports from the previous 12 months 1 BIGHORN RIVER BASIN INFLOW (1000 acre-feet) End of March End of March Accumulated Inflow Inflow Historical Inflow October - March W. Yr. 30 Yr. % of W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. 30 Yr. % of Reservoir 2021 Avg. ¹ Avg. 2020 2019 2018 2021 Avg. Avg. Bull Lake 2.2 2.0 111 0.9 1.5 2.7 13.7 18.1 76 Boysen 48.9 53.7 91 75.5 58.9 73.0 223.0 276.1 81 Buffalo Bill 19.6 21.7 90 20.6 21.7 23.8 124.2 120.4 103 ¹ Average is based on the 1991-2020 period. BIGHORN RIVER BASIN RESERVOIR INFLOW End of March 80 70 60 50 40 FEET FEET 1000 X - 30 ACRE 20 10 0 Bull Lake Boysen Buffalo Bill RESERVOIR Average 2021 2020 2019 2018 2 BIGHORN RIVER BASIN OUTFLOW (1000 acre-feet) End of March End of March Cumulative Outflow Outflow Historical Outflow October - March W. Yr. 30 Yr. % of W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. 30 Yr. % of Reservoir 2021 Avg. ¹ Avg. 2020 2019 2018 2021 Avg Avg. Bull Lake 1.5 1.8 85 1.2 1.9 2.6 9.3 16.6 56 Boysen 37.5 57.3 65 88.1 61.8 117.2 231.8 298.8 78 Buffalo Bill 13.8 26.3 53 29.8 34.1 67.8 117.0 142.2 82 ¹ Average is based on the 1991-2020 period. BIGHORN RIVER BASIN RESERVOIR OUTFLOW End of March 120 100 80 60 40 ACRE-FEET X 1000 X 1000 ACRE-FEET 20 0 Bull Lake Boysen Buffalo Bill RESERVOIR Average 2021 2020 2019 2018 3 BIGHORN RIVER BASIN STORAGE (1000 acre-feet) Total Storage End of March Total Percent End of March Historical Storage Conservation of Reservoir W. Yr. 30 Yr. % of W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. Storage Capacity 2021 Avg. ¹ Avg. 2020 2019 2018 Capacity Bull Lake 79.5 78.5 101 92.1 81.0 104.5 152.5 52 Boysen 562.5 555.3 101 579.7 571.6 571.4 741.6 76 Buffalo Bill 457.3 422.8 108 455.7 431.0 423.4 646.6 71 Pilot Butte 27.6 28.7 96 27.6 27.8 27.9 33.7 82 ¹ Average is based on the 1991-2020 period. ² This does not reflect a long term average because in 1992 the capacity of the reservoir was increased to approximately 646,565 acre-feet as a result of raising the dam. The average used here reflects data from 1993 through 2020. BIGHORN RIVER BASIN RESERVOIR STORAGE End of March 700 600 500 400 FEET X 1000 - 300 ACRE 200 100 0 Bull Lake Boysen Buffalo Bill Pilot Butte RESERVOIR Average 2021 2020 2019 2018 4 BIGHORN RIVER BASIN GENERATION (Energy in giga-watt hours) End of March End of March Accumulated Gross Gen. Gross Generation Historical Generation October - March Powerplant W. Yr. 30 YR. % of W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. Accum % of 2021 Avg. Avg. 2020 2019 2018 2021 Avg. Avg. Boysen ¹ 2.9 4.0 72 6.7 4.9 5.6 16.9 21.6 78 Pilot Butte ² 0.0 0.0 n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 n/a Heart Mtn. ³ 0.0 0.1 n/a 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.7 1.1 155 Buffalo Bill ³ 0.5 3.5 13 3.8 5.5 12.8 2.8 14.8 19 Shoshone ³ 1.8 1.4 125 1.8 1.2 1.0 8.3 8.6 97 Spirit Mtn. 4 0.0 0.0 n/a 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.7 1.1 155 1 Average is based on the 1991-2020 period. 2 Average is based on the 1991-2020 period. Pilot Butte Powerplant is currently in "mothballed" status and does not generate electricity. 3 Average is based on the 1993-2020 period. 4 Average is based on the 1996-2020 period. BIGHORN RIVER BASIN GROSS GENERATION End of March 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 GWH 4.0 2.0 0.0 Boysen Pilot Butte Heart Mtn. Buffalo Bill Shoshone Spirit Mtn. RESERVOIR Average 2021 2020 2019 2018 5 BIGHORN SNOWPACK WATER CONTENT SWE in inches ¹ April 1st Comparative April 1st Snow-Water Equivalent Snow-Water Equivalent WATERSHED W. Yr. 30 Yr. % of W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. 2021 Median Median 2020 2019 2018 Bull Lake Reservoir 10.3 11.9 87 11.4 11.9 9.7 Boysen Reservoir 12.3 13.0 95 14.4 12.6 11.3 Buffalo Bill Reservoir 16.4 17.1 96 19.1 17.2 16.1 Boysen Reservoir Watershed Buffalo Bill Reservoir Watershed SWE in inches ¹ SWE in inches ¹ Snotel Stations Water 30 Yr. Snotel Stations Water 30 Yr. (Elevation) Content Median ² (Elevation) Content Median ² Burroughs Creek (8,750) 10.4 13.1 Blackwater (9,780) 19.7 22.1 Hobbs Park (10,100) 11.8 13.4 Evening Star (9,200) 26.3 23.9 Kirwin (9,800) 9.2 9.4 Marquette (8,760) 5.2 8.0 Little Warm (9,620) 9.8 10.2 Sylvan Lake (8,420) 17.6 19.2 Togwotee Pass (9,580) 21.7 21.6 Sylvan Road (8,120) 10.1 11.1 Townsend Creek (8,700) 9.2 9.0 Togwotee Pass (9,580) 21.7 21.6 Younts Peak (8,350) 14.1 14.1 Younts Peak (8,350) 14.1 14.1 Watershed Average 12.3 13.0 Watershed Average 16.4 17.1 Bull Lake Reservoir Watershed SWE in inches ¹ Snotel Stations Water 30 Yr. (Elevation) Content Median ² Elkhart Park (8,400) 9.3 12.1 Hobbs Park (10,100) 11.8 13.4 Little Warm (9,620) 9.8 10.2 Watershed Average 10.3 11.9 ¹ SWE (Snow Water Content is the amount of water in the snowpack expressed in inches) ² Median for the 1981-2010 period 6 BIGHORN WATER SUPPLY FORECAST (1000 acre-feet) April 1, 2021 Actual 30 Yr. Comparative Actual Forecast April-July Runoff ³ April-July Expected April - July Runoff Points Reasonable Reasonable Runoff % of Avg. W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. W. Yr. Minimum¹ Expected Maximum¹ Avg. ² 2020 2019 2018 2017 Bull Lake 80 120 160 144.0 83 123.0 160.5 175.0 263.0 Reservoir Wind River above 225 350 475 437.6 80 424.1 475.6 817.9 913.9 Bull Lake Creek Boysen 250 450 700 621.4 72 439.3 823.1 1,007.0 1,636.2 Reservoir Buffalo Bill 500 700 900 749.0 93 791.2 901.1 1,299.7 1,262.0 Reservoir ¹ The probability is estimated to be 9 chances in 10 that the actual volume will fall between the reasonable minimum and reasonable maximum. ² Average is based on the 1991-2020 period. (1000 acre-feet) April 1, 2021 Forecast of April-July Runoff 30 Yr. Forecast April-July Points Probability of Exceedance Runoff 90% 70% 50% % of Avg 30% 10% Avg. ¹ Bull Lake 80 104 120 83 136 160 144.0 Reservoir Wind River above 225 299 350 80 401 475 437.6 Bull Lake Creek Boysen 250 368 450 72 552 700 621.4 Reservoir Buffalo Bill 500 618 700 93 782 900 749.0 Reservoir ¹ Average is based on the 1991-2020 period. Page 7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Secondary Carbonate Accumulations in Soils of the Baikal Region: Formation Processes and Significance for Paleosoil Investigations
    Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология. 2017. № 39. С. 6–28 АГРОХИМИЯ И ПОЧВОВЕДЕНИЕ УДК 631.48 (571.5) doi: 10.17223/19988591/39/1 В.А. Голубцов Институт географии им. В.Б. Сочавы СО РАН, г. Иркутск, Россия Карбонатные новообразования в почвах Байкальского региона: процессы формирования и значение для палеопочвенных исследований Работа выполнена при поддержке РФФИ (проект № 17-04-00092). На данный момент вопросы, касающиеся строения, хронологии и специфики формирования педогенных карбонатов в резкоконтинентальных областях юга Восточной Сибири, остаются практически незатронутыми. Выполнено обобщение сформировавшихся за последние годы представлений о механизмах формирования карбонатных новообразований почв, а также их связи с условиями среды и процессами почвообразования. Оценены пути поступления карбонатов и основные факторы их аккумуляции в профиле почв. Описаны особенности вещественного и изотопного состава карбонатных новообразований в почвах, формирующихся в различных климатических условиях. На основании собственных исследований приводятся данные о разнообразии карбонатных аккумуляций в почвах Байкальского региона, их вещественном составе и роли в качестве палеогеографических индикаторов. Детально рассмотрены следующие формы карбонатных новообразований: ризолиты, игольчатый кальцит, гипокутаны, белоглазка, нодули, кутаны, лессовые куколки. Ключевые слова: карбонаты; педогенные карбонатные новообразования; стабильные изотопы; почвы; палеореконструкции. Введение Первостепенное значение при изучении эволюции почв имеет
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Digital Document from the Collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library
    This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library. For additional information about this document and the document conversion process, please contact WRDS at [email protected] and include the phrase “Digital Documents” in your subject heading. To view other documents please visit the WRDS Library online at: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu Mailing Address: Water Resources Data System University of Wyoming, Dept 3943 1000 E University Avenue Laramie, WY 82071 Physical Address: Wyoming Hall, Room 249 University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071 Phone: (307) 766-6651 Fax: (307) 766-3785 Funding for WRDS and the creation of this electronic document was provided by the Wyoming Water Development Commission (http://wwdc.state.wy.us) VOLUME 11-A OCCURRENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUND WATER IN THE BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING Robert Libra, Dale Doremus , Craig Goodwin Project Manager Craig Eisen Water Resources Research Institute University of Wyoming Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Contract Number G 008269-791 Project Officer Paul Osborne June, 1981 INTRODUCTION This report is the second of a series of hydrogeologic basin reports that define the occurrence and chemical quality of ground water within Wyoming. Information presented in this report has been obtained from several sources including available U.S. Geological Survey publications, the Wyoming State Engineer's Office, the Wyoming Geological Survey, and the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. The purpose of this report is to provide background information for implementation of the Underground Injection Control Program (UIC). The UIC program, authorized by the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork and Heart Mountain Faults: Examples of Catastrophic, Gravity-Driven “Overthrusts,” Northwest Wyoming, Usa
    Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Creationism. Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship SOUTH FORK AND HEART MOUNTAIN FAULTS: EXAMPLES OF CATASTROPHIC, GRAVITY-DRIVEN “OVERTHRUSTS,” NORTHWEST WYOMING, USA Timothy L. Clarey, PhD, MS, MS, BS, 2878 Oaklawn Park, Saginaw, MI, 48603, KEYWORDS: break-away fault, denudation, detachment, gravity slide, gypsum dehydration, overthrust ABSTRACT Overthrust faults have been a source of debate and discussion in creation literature for many years. Their interpretation demands a better explanation in a Flood context. Two fault systems are examined as analogies for an “overthrust” model. The South Fork Fault System (SFFS) and the Heart Mountain Fault System (HMFS) exhibit folding and faulting consistent with thin- skinned overthrust systems. Both systems moved catastrophically under the influence of gravity. The South Fork Fault system (SFFS, southwest of Cody, Wyoming, exhibits tear faults, tight folds, a triangle zone, and flat-ramp geometries along the leading edge of the system. Transport was southeast, down a gentle slope during early to middle Eocene time (Late Flood), approximately coeval with the Heart Mountain Fault system (HMFS). The SFFS detaches in lower Jurassic strata, rich in gypsum-anhydrite, overlain by about 1250 m of Jurassic through Tertiary sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Movement between 5 km and 10 km to the southeast spread the allochthonous mass over an area exceeding 1400 km2. A break-away fault and an area of tectonic denudation mark the upper northwest part of the system. The exposed denuded surface was buried by additional Eocene-age volcanic rocks soon after slip. Catastrophic rear- loading during emplacement of HMFS may have initiated subsequent movement on the SFFS, with dehydration processes trapping water in a near frictionless anhydrite-water slurry.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Paleontological Resources at Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area, Montana and Wyoming
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES AT BIGHORN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, MONTANA AND WYOMING Vincent L. Santucci1, David Hays2, James Staebler2 And Michael Milstein3 1National Park Service, P.O. Box 592, Kemmerer, WY 83101 2Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area, P.O. Box 7458, Fort Smith, MT 59035 3P.O. Box 821, Cody, WY 82414 ____________________ ABSTRACT - Paleontological resources occur throughout the Paleozoic and Mesozoic formations exposed in Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area. Isolated research on specific geologic units within Bighorn Canyon has yielded data on a wide diversity of fossil forms. A comprehensive paleonotological survey has not been previously undertaken at Bighorn Canyon. Preliminary paleontologic resource data is presented in this report as an effort to establish baseline data. ____________________ INTRODUCTION ighorn Canyon National Recreation Area (BICA) consists of approximately 120,000 acres within the Bighorn Mountains of north-central Wyoming and south-central Montana B (Figure 1). The northwestern trending Bighorn Mountains consist of over 9,000 feet of sedimentary rock. The predominantly marine and near shore sedimentary units range from the Cambrian through the Lower Cretaceous. Many of these formations are extremely fossiliferous. The Bighorn Mountains were uplifted during the Laramide Orogeny beginning approximately 70 million years ago. Large volumes of sediments, rich in early Tertiary paleontological resources, were deposited in the adjoining basins. This report provides a preliminary assessment of paleontological resources identified at Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area. STRATIGRAPHY The stratigraphic record at Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area extends from the Cambrian through the Cretaceous (Figure 2). The only time period during this interval that is not represented is the Silurian.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Showing Thermal Maturity of Upper Cretaceous Marine Shales in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming and Montana
    Maps Showing Thermal Maturity of Upper Cretaceous Marine Shales in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming and Montana Scientific Investigations Map 3285 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photograph: Upper part of Cody Shale near Greybull, Wyoming, east flank of the Bighorn Basin. Photograph by R.C. Johnson, 1994. Maps Showing Thermal Maturity of Upper Cretaceous Marine Shales in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming and Montana By Thomas M. Finn and Mark J. Pawlewicz Scientific Investigations Map 3285 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Finn, T.M., and Pawlewicz, M.J., 2014, Maps showing thermal maturity of Upper Cretaceous marine shales in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming and Montana: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails and Aboriginal Land Use in the Northern Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1992 Trails and Aboriginal land use in the northern Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming Steve Platt The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Platt, Steve, "Trails and Aboriginal land use in the northern Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming" (1992). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3933. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3933 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial giain may be undertaken only with the author's written consent. MontanaUniversity of TRAILS AND ABORIGINAL LAND USE IN THE NORTHERN BIGHORN MOUNTAINS, WYOMING By Steve Piatt B.A. University of Vermont, 1987 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 19-92 Approved by 4— Chair, Board of Examiners Death, Graduate £>c3Tooi 7 is. rtqz Date UMI Number: EP36285 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Valley-Watershed Plan Level I Study-Final Report-2010.Pdf
    This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library. For additional information about this document and the document conversion process, please contact WRDS at [email protected] and include the phrase “Digital Documents” in your subject heading. To view other documents please visit the WRDS Library online at: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu Mailing Address: Water Resources Data System University of Wyoming, Dept 3943 1000 E University Avenue Laramie, WY 82071 Physical Address: Wyoming Hall, Room 249 University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071 Phone: (307) 766-6651 Fax: (307) 766-3785 Funding for WRDS and the creation of this electronic document was provided by the Wyoming Water Development Commission (http://wwdc.state.wy.us) Watershed Plan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level I Study Submitted by: ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 130 NORTH BENT STREET POWELL WY 82435 GEOMATRIX CONSULTANTS 1824 NORTH LAST CHANCE GULCH PO BOX 7118 HELENA MT 59601 WESTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PO BOX 6045 HELENA MT 59604 FINAL REPORT March 2010 SHELL VALLEY WATERSHED PLAN LEVEL I STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. I LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................ IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Basin, Wyoming
    / . Descriptive Geology, 91 Professional P~per No. 53 Senes {B, 0, Underground Waters, 57 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ,UNITED , . STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR GEOLOGY AND 'VATER RESOURCES OF THE BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING BY CASSIUS A. FISHER WASHINGTON G'OVEI~N:MENT PHIN'TING OFFICE 1906 .r.!J -7, '3 tl ~ -8'-'1~ no, ~- 3 C/ I : .l ~\ 72 3656 3 09 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction. ____________ _-- - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - - _ - ___ ------------------ ___ - ___ ------- ' -------- __ 1 Topography ___________________ ---- -- -- -- -- __________ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ___ - -- -- -- -- -- -- ____ _ 1 General relations. ____________ ------- ___________________________________________________ _ 1 Relief. _________________ - _ -- -- ---------- -- -- -- ------ ---- ------ -- ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- - 2 Bighorn Mountain region ___________________________________________________ _ 2 Bridger and Owl Creek mountains_, ________________________ , __________________ _ 3 Absaroka and Beartooth.mountains __________________________________ , ________ _ 3 Shoshone Mountains ________________________________________________________ _ 3 Sheep Mountain region. ____________________________________________________ _ 4 Bighorn basin region _______________________________________________ , ______ _ 4 Drainage. _____ -- - _ -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - ___________ -- -- -- - _ -- -- -- -- -- -- - ___________________ _ 5 Bighorn River ____________ : ________________________________________________ _ 5 Shoshone River. ___________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Basin Stratigraphic Column Prior to Arriving at Field Camp
    Tectonic Setting Tectonostratigraphic Stratigraphy and Orogenic Events Assemblage Quaternary Pliocene c i Neog. Miocene o z Oligocene o n Tatman Fm. e Eocene C Willwood Fm. TSA4 Retroarc foreland segmented Paleogene Paleocene Fort Union Fm. Laramide Orogeny by basement uplifts; non-marine Lance Formation Meeteetse Fm. Mesaverde Fm. n TSA3 i g Upper Cody Shale r Retroarc foreland; a shallow marine to Torchlight Sandstone M Frontier Fm. t Peay Sandstone n e sediments Mowry Shale g r Sevier Orogeny Cretaceous Shell Creek Shale e c i Muddy Sandstone v o Thermopolis Shale n z Lower Sykes Mtn. Fm. (“Rusty beds”) o o Cloverly Fm. Greybull Ss. C s e Nevadan Orogeny TSA2 M Morrison Fm. Transitional to retroarc Upper Sundance “upper Sund.” foreland; shallow Formation “lower Sund.” marine & non-marine Middle Gypsum Spring Fm. clastic sediments Jurassic Lower Triassic Chugwater Formation Dinwoody Fm. Goose Phosphoria Egg Fm. Permian Fm. Ancestral Rockies TSA1 Pennsylvanian Tensleep Sandstone Orogeny Amsden Fm. Darwin Ss. Proximal miogeoclinal strata; mixed carbonate Mississippian Madison Limestone c & siliciclastic sediment; i Darby Fm. Antler Orogeny o dominated by shallow z Devonian o marine & marginal e n l Silurian i marine facies a g Bighorn Dolomite r P Ordovician a M Lander Sandstone e Gallatin v Upper i Limestone s s Gros Ventre Fm. a Middle P Flathead Ss. Cambrian Lower Precambrian Crystalline basement Archean crytalline basement Generalized stratigraphic column for the northern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, with timing of regional orogenic events and interpretation of tectonostratigraphic assemblages. Modified from May et al. (2013; GSA Bulletin, v. 125, p. 1403-1422), who in turn derived their figure from Fox and Dolton (1996; Wyoming Geological Association 47 Annual Field Conference Guidebook, p.
    [Show full text]
  • American Journal of Science, Vol
    [American Journal of Science, Vol. 311, December, 2011,P.813–850, DOI 10.2475/10.2011.01] American Journal of Science DECEMBER 2011 MAGNETOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE LEBO AND TONGUE RIVER MEMBERS OF THE FORT UNION FORMATION (PALEOCENE) IN THE NORTHEASTERN POWDER RIVER BASIN, MONTANA DANIEL J. PEPPE*, KIRK R. JOHNSON**, and DAVID A. D. EVANS*** ABSTRACT. We analyzed paleomagnetic samples and documented the stratigraphy from two sections near Miles City, Montana to determine the geomagnetic polarity stratigraphy and to constrain the age and duration of the Lebo and Tongue River Members of the Fort Union Formation in the northeastern Powder River Basin. The resulting polarity sequence can be correlated to subchrons C29n–C26r of the geomag- netic polarity time scale. By interpolating measured sediment accumulation rates from the base of C28r to the top of C27n, and then extrapolating to the top of the Tongue River Member and the bottom of the Lebo Member, we developed two age models to estimate the durations of the Lebo and Tongue River Members. Based on the first model, which uses different sedimentation rates for the Lebo and Tongue River Members, we estimate the duration of deposition of the Lebo to be between 1.30 and 1.74 million years and of the Tongue River to be between 1.42 and 1.61 million years. Using the second model, which uses the same sedimentation rate for the Lebo and Tongue River Members, we estimate the duration of deposition of the Lebo to be between 1.33 and 1.76 million years and of the Tongue River to be between 1.00 and 1.25 million years.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Condition of Perennial Streams and Rivers in the Bighorn and Yellowstone Basins
    1 Water Quality Condition of Perennial Streams and Rivers in the Bighorn and Yellowstone Basins Water Quality Condition of Perennial Streams and Rivers in the Bighorn and Yellowstone Basins Results of the 2010 Bighorn/Yellowstone Probabilistic Survey Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality – Water Quality Division Document #14-0586, July 2014 2 Water Quality Condition of Perennial Streams and Rivers in the Bighorn and Yellowstone Basins Water Quality Condition of Perennial Streams and Rivers in the Bighorn and Yellowstone Basins Results of the 2010 Bighorn/Yellowstone Probabilistic Survey By Eric G. Hargett and Jeremy R. ZumBerge Document #14-0586 July 2014 Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division – Watershed Protection Program 122 W. 25th St., Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 i Water Quality Condition of Perennial Streams and Rivers in the Bighorn and Yellowstone Basins Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................ 3 PROBABILISTIC SURVEYS AND WYOMING’S INTEGRATED REPORT ..................................................................... 4 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Basin Province (034)
    BIGHORN BASIN PROVINCE (034) By James E. Fox and Gordon L. Dolton INTRODUCTION The Bighorn Basin is an asymmetric heart-shaped intermontane basin of the Rocky Mountain foreland, located in north-central Wyoming and south-central Montana. Province boundaries are defined by fault-bounded Laramide uplifts that surround it. These include the Owl Creeks to the south, Absaroka Volcanic Plateau and Beartooths to the west, Big Horns to the east, and the Nye-Bowler Lineament to the north in Montana. The province is about 175 miles long and 100 miles wide encompassing an area of about 13,200 sq mi. Approximately 1.8 BBO and 2.7 TCFG have been discovered (as of year-end 1990) since the first fields, Garland and Greybull, were discovered in 1906 and 1907, respectively. The vast majority of production has been from basin margin anticlinal structures such as Oregon Basin (475 MMBO, and 206 BCFG), Elk Basin (557 MMBO, and 368 BCFG), Hamilton Dome (261 MMBO), Grass Creek (212 MMBO) and Garland (200 MMBO and 142 BCFG). The largest stratigraphically trapped field is Cottonwood Creek (discovered in 1953) with 59 MMBO and 42 BCFG from the Phosphoria Formation. Plays in this basin result from both structural and stratigraphic traps and occur in primarily Permian and Cretaceous source rock and reservoir systems. Plays individually assessed or considered are treated in the following discussion. Conventional plays include Basin Margin Subthrust Play (3401), Basin Margin Anticline Play (3402), Deep Basin Structure Play (3403), Sub-Absaroka Play (3405), Phosphoria Stratigraphic Play (3406), Tensleep Paleotopography Play (3407), Greybull-Cloverly-Muddy Sandstone Stratigraphic Play (3408), Bighorn-Darby Wedge-Edge Pinchout Play (3410), Flathead-Lander and Equivalent Sandstone Stratigraphic Play (3411), Madison Limestone Stratigraphic Play (3412), Darwin-Amsden Sandstone Stratigraphic Play (3413), Triassic-Jurassic Stratigraphic Play (3414), Cody and Frontier Stratigraphic Play (3416), and Shallow Tertiary-Upper Cretaceous Stratigraphic Play (3417).
    [Show full text]