DOCSLIB.ORG

WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide Edited by David Stevenson Published November 2004 Minor revisions February 2005 Revised November 2006 © English Bridge Union Ltd 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 1 White Book 2004 – Second edition November 2006 – Contents CONTENTS CONTENTS 2 I INTRODUCTION 15 Miscellaneous 15 0.1 General..........................................................................................................................15 0.2 Other sponsoring organisations ....................................................................................15 0.3 Contacts ........................................................................................................................16 0.4 Numbering system ........................................................................................................16 0.5 Abbreviations.................................................................................................................17 0.6 Second edition $$..........................................................................................................17 Scope of the Laws 17 0.7 Extraneous action [WBFLC] ..........................................................................................17 0.8 Score adjustment [WBFLC]...........................................................................................17 Definitions: Convention 18 0.9 Denomination [WBFLC].................................................................................................18 0.10 Canapé [WBFLC] ..........................................................................................................18 Definitions: Irregularity 18 0.11 Errors [WBFLC] .............................................................................................................18 II PRELIMINARIES 19 Law 1 The Pack - Rank of Cards and Suits 19 1.1 Defective pack...............................................................................................................19 Law 3 Arrangement of tables 19 3.1 Normal layout, and exception for Swiss Teams events.................................................19 3.2 Numbering.....................................................................................................................19 Law 4 Partnerships 20 4.1 Replacement of members of a team or pair ..................................................................20 Law 5 Assignment of seats 20 5.1 Swiss events .................................................................................................................20 5.2 Ties in Knockout Teams events ....................................................................................20 Law 6 The Shuffle and Deal 21 6.1 Law 6D3 [Redealing] [WBFLC] .....................................................................................21 III PREPARATION AND PROGRESSION 22 Law 7 Control of Board and Cards 22 7.1 Counting cards ..............................................................................................................22 IV GENERAL LAWS GOVERNING IRREGULARITIES 23 Law 9 Procedure following an irregularity 23 9.1 Late rulings....................................................................................................................23 2 White Book 2004 – Second edition November 2006 – Contents Law 10 Assessment of a penalty 24 10.1 Evidence of how a player has been damaged by an infraction .....................................24 Law 11 Forfeiture of the right to penalise 24 11.1 When to apply Law 11A ................................................................................................24 Law 12 Director's discretionary powers 25 12.1 Types of score adjustments...........................................................................................25 12.1.1 Artificial Adjusted scores...............................................................................................25 12.1.2 Assigned Adjusted scores ............................................................................................25 12.1.3 Split scores ...................................................................................................................26 12.1.4 Weighted scores ...........................................................................................................27 12.1.5 Split and Weighted scores............................................................................................29 12.1.6 Method of calculating split and/or weighted scores at pairs contests. .........................29 12.1.7 Method of calculating weighted scores at hybrid scoring. ............................................29 12.2 Score adjustments.........................................................................................................30 12.3 Claims ...........................................................................................................................30 12.4 Standard adjustments for various methods of scoring ..................................................30 12.5 "Standard amounts" for various methods of scoring .....................................................30 12.6 Adjusted score in teams events if board not playable at second table..........................31 12.7 Keeping everyone happy...............................................................................................31 12.8 Law 12C1 [Artificial adjustment] [WBFLC].....................................................................32 12.9 Law 12C2 [Assigned adjustment - split] [WBFLC].........................................................32 12.10 Law 12C2 [Assigned adjustment - general] [WBFLC] $$ ..............................................33 12.11 Law 12C3 [Assigned adjustment - weighted] [WBFLC].................................................34 Law 13 Incorrect number of cards 34 13.1 53 cards in pack ............................................................................................................34 13.2 14 cards in one hand, 12 in another..............................................................................35 Law 15 Play of a wrong board 35 15.1 Board played in wrong section ......................................................................................35 15.2 Law 15C [Play of wrong board discovered during auction] [WBFLC]............................35 Law 16 Unauthorised Information 36 16.1 Unauthorised information not from partner....................................................................36 16.2 What does a hesitation mean?......................................................................................36 16.3 Weighting when a call (or play) is disallowed................................................................37 16.4 "Hesitation Blackwood"..................................................................................................38 16.5 A short hesitation after an unexpected call....................................................................38 16.6 Logical alternative .........................................................................................................39 16.7 Think before you adjust! ................................................................................................39 16.8 Did anyone hesitate? $$...............................................................................................39 16.9 Law 16A [Unauthorised information from partner] [WBFLC] .........................................39 16.10 Law 16C [Withdrawn calls] [WBFLC] $$........................................................................40 V THE AUCTION 41 Law 17 Duration of the Auction 41 17.1 Law 17D [Cards from wrong board] [WBFLC]...............................................................41 Law 20 Review and Explanation of Calls 41 20.1 Law 20F [Asking questions] [WBFLC]...........................................................................41 Law 21 Call based on misinformation 42 21.1 When is it too late to change a call? $$.........................................................................42 21.2 Law 21 [Misinformation] [WBFLC].................................................................................43 3 White Book 2004 – Second edition November 2006 – Contents Law 25 Legal and illegal changes of call 43 25.1 When does Law 25B apply?..........................................................................................43 25.2 How to apply Law 25B...................................................................................................43 25.3 Law 25A [Correction of an inadvertent call] [WBFLC] ...................................................44 25.4 Laws 25A and 45C4B [What is inadvertent?] [WBFLC] ................................................44 25.5 Law 25B [Delayed or purposeful change of call] [WBFLC]............................................44 25.6 Laws 25B1 and 27 [Insufficient bid corrected] [WBFLC] ...............................................45 Law 26 Call withdrawn, lead penalties 45 26.1 Reference from other Laws to Law 26...........................................................................45 26.2 Interpretation of "for that turn" .......................................................................................45 26.3 Law 26 [Lead penalties] [WBFLC].................................................................................45 26.4 Law 26 [Lead penalties and calls out of rotation] [WBFLC]...........................................45 Law 27 Insufficient Bid 45 27.1 Corrected before the TD arrives....................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Things You Might Like to Know About Duplicate Bridge
    ♠♥♦♣ THINGS YOU MIGHT LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT DUPLICATE BRIDGE Prepared by MayHem Published by the UNIT 241 Board of Directors ♠♥♦♣ Welcome to Duplicate Bridge and the ACBL This booklet has been designed to serve as a reference tool for miscellaneous information about duplicate bridge and its governing organization, the ACBL. It is intended for the newer or less than seasoned duplicate bridge players. Most of these things that follow, while not perfectly obvious to new players, are old hat to experienced tournaments players. Table of Contents Part 1. Expected In-behavior (or things you need to know).........................3 Part 2. Alerts and Announcements (learn to live with them....we have!)................................................4 Part 3. Types of Regular Events a. Stratified Games (Pairs and Teams)..............................................12 b. IMP Pairs (Pairs)...........................................................................13 c. Bracketed KO’s (Teams)...............................................................15 d. Swiss Teams and BAM Teams (Teams).......................................16 e. Continuous Pairs (Side Games)......................................................17 f. Strategy: IMPs vs Matchpoints......................................................18 Part 4. Special ACBL-Wide Events (they cost more!)................................20 Part 5. Glossary of Terms (from the ACBL website)..................................25 Part 6. FAQ (with answers hopefully).........................................................40 Copyright © 2004 MayHem 2 Part 1. Expected In-Behavior Just as all kinds of competitive-type endeavors have their expected in- behavior, so does duplicate bridge. One important thing to keep in mind is that this is a competitive adventure.....as opposed to the social outing that you may be used to at your rubber bridge games. Now that is not to say that you can=t be sociable at the duplicate table. Of course you can.....and should.....just don=t carry it to extreme by talking during the auction or play.
    [Show full text]
  • 27, 2010 Volume 83, Number 2 Daily Bulletin
    Saturday, November 27, 2010 Volume 83, Number 2 Daily Bulletin 83rd North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Dave Smith Thomas McAdoo Married couple take Non-LM Pairs Dianne and Roger Pryor of Madeira Smith Beach FL had two solid games to win 1938–2010 the Manfield Non-Life Master Pairs. The Tom Smith, married couple scored 58.25% and 57.04% one of the five for a combined 57.80%. In second place original “Precision were Ryan Miller, Tampa FL; Brandon Team” members Harper, Winter Park FL with 55.46%. that dominated The winners play a weak 1NT (11—14 North American high-card points) and attribute some of contests in the early their good board to their system. Seventies, died Nov. The Pryors have played together 15 in his hometown for about 30 years. Dianne, a retired of Bennington VT. homemaker, has about 100 masterpoints. As well as being Roger, a retired engineer with Bell South a top level player International, has almost 400 masterpoints. and teacher, Smith Dianne credits Roger with teaching her was a publisher, how to play. journalist, editor and club manager. The second-place pair, Miller and Roger and Dianne Pryor are winners of the Manfield Smith won the Spingold Knockout Teams in Harper, are high school students. Non-Life Master Pairs. 1970 and 1971 and Vanderbilt Knockout Teams in 1972 playing with a rotating cast of teammates that included Steve Altman, Eugene Neiger, Finals today in Open Thirty-two teams continued on page 5 and Women’s Pairs left in Baze Champions will be crowned tonight in the Nail Fung hopes Life Master Open Pairs and the Smith Life Master Senior KO Women’s Pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • English Bridge Union National Grading Scheme Full Description
    English Bridge Union National Grading Scheme Full description Version 16 April 2018 Version 16: April 2018 Authors The NGS Working Group: Present and past members of the Working Group include: Mike Christie (Project Manager and Programmer) Barrie Partridge Paul Bond Paul Habershon Andy Kittridge Peter Lee Anthony Moon John Probst Jerry Rudge The late Dr John Carter Barry Capal (former EBU General Manager) Michael Clark (EBU IT Support Officer and web master) This Guide This guide provides full details of the National Grading Scheme itself, but please see also on the EBU web site a guide for scorers “Procedural Guide for scorers” New for Version 15: Requirements for the host’s exemption. Contents Page Introduction to the National Grading Scheme Objectives of the National Grading Scheme 5 NGS Grades 5 Calculating your grade 6 Which events are graded? 7 Viewing your grade 7 Accuracy of grades in the NGS 7 Partnership grades 8 Full Details of the scheme Which events count toward the scheme? 9 Decay of effect of previous sessions 9 Strength of opponents and strength of field 11 Calculating Session Grades for pairs events 12 1. Match pointed pairs 12 2. Butler pairs 13 3. Cross-IMPed pairs 13 4. Aggregate pairs 14 Calculating event grades for teams of four events 14 Grades for partnerships 15 Grade initialization 16 Diffusion 17 Assisting diffusion 18 Version 16: April 2018 Limitations to diffusion 19 Chronology 19 Using the national grading scheme for club handicapped events 20 Further information on the scheme 20 Frequently Asked Questions 1. What does my EBU numeric grade mean? 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2014 Commencement Program
    TE TA UN S E ST TH AT I F E V A O O E L F A DITAT DEUS N A E R R S I O Z T S O A N Z E I A R I T G R Y A 1912 1885 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT AND CONVOCATION PROGRAM Spring 2014 May 12 - 16, 2014 THE NATIONAL ANTHEM THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER O say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming? Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming? And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there. O say does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave? ALMA MATER ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Where the bold saguaros Raise their arms on high, Praying strength for brave tomorrows From the western sky; Where eternal mountains Kneel at sunset’s gate, Here we hail thee, Alma Mater, Arizona State. —Hopkins-Dresskell MAROON AND GOLD Fight, Devils down the field Fight with your might and don’t ever yield Long may our colors outshine all others Echo from the buttes, Give em’ hell Devils! Cheer, cheer for A-S-U! Fight for the old Maroon For it’s Hail! Hail! The gang’s all here And it’s onward to victory! Students whose names appear in this program have completed degree requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • O'dwyer's May '17 PR Firm Rankings Magazine
    Communications & New Media May 2017 I Vol. 31 No. 5 2017 PR RANKINGS ISSUE PR FIRMS RANKED BY ANNUAL GROWTH, NET FEES, SPECIALTY & GEOGRAPHY RANKINGS OF TECHNOLOGY & HIGH-TECH PR FIRMS, PG. 26 FINANCIAL PR & INVESTOR RELATIONS FIRMS RANKED, PG. 30 O’DWYER’S RANKINGS OF TOP HEALTHCARE PR FIRMS, PG. 36 TRAVEL, TOURISM & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANKINGS, PG. 39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PR FIRMS RANKED, PG. 40 O’DWYER’S RANKINGS OF FOOD & BEVERAGE PR FIRMS, PG. 41 PR drives first quarter growth for conglomerates. FTC puts influencers in the regulatory crosshairs. Why executive commentary on social media matters. Tech firms focus on social media, content development. Profiles of top-ranked public relations firms. May 2017 | www.odwyerpr.com Vol. 31. No. 5 MAY 2017 EDITORIAL HEALTHCARE PR THRIVES IN UNCERTAIN TIMES FTC PUTS INFLUENCERS 6 32 IN THE CROSSHAIRS O’DWYER’S RANKINGS OF 8 HEALTHCARE PR FIRMS PR DRIVES Q1 GROWTH FOR CONGLOMS 36 O’DWYER’S RANKINGS 8 ADDING VALUE TO 9 OF PR SPECIALTIES INTEGRATED COMMS 10 38 TEN PEOPLE DETERMINE PR INDUSTRY MAKES YOUR VALUATION 12 42 THE MOST OF CHANGE SOCIAL MEDIA NEEDS EXEC COMMENTARY O’DWYER’S RANKINGS OF MAJOR US PR FIRMS 14 50WWW.ODWYERPR.COM BRAND LESSONS FROM 50 Daily, up-to-the-minute PR news THE CHICAGO CUBS LEADING GAINERS 16 AMONG PR FIRMS CAUGHT IN THE FAKE 52 NEWS CROSSHAIRS O’DWYER’S REGIONAL 18 RANKING OF PR FIRMS TECHNOLOGY PR: A TALE OF TWO COASTS 54 20 PEOPLE IN PR PR NEEDS A NEW DEFINITION 56 22 PROFILES OF RANKED TECH FIRMS FOCUS ON PR FIRMS SOCIAL MEDIA, CONTENT 58 EDITORIAL CALENDAR 2017 January: Crisis Comms.
    [Show full text]
  • MUCH WORK LEFT to Dofriday, 8 October 2010
    World Bridge Series Championship Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA 1st to 16th October D B 2010 aily ulletin O FFICIAL S PONSOR Co-ordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer • Chief Editor: Brent Manley • Editors: Mark Horton, Brian Senior, Phillip Alder, Barry Rigal, Jan Van Cleef • Lay Out Editor: Akis Kanaris • Photographer: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 7 MUCH WORK LEFT TO DOFriday, 8 October 2010 The WBF Women’s Committee had the honor and pleasure of toasting WBF President José Damiani on Thursday, thanking him for his friendship, trust and great support that he gave the committee since the first year of his presidency (Anna Maria Torlontano). Sixty-four teams have made it to the knockout phase of the Rosenblum after three days of qualifying play, but it’s still a Contents long haul to the finish line for the hopefuls, who start head- Important Notices . .2 to-head play today. Rosenblum / McConnell Results . .4-5 Leading the way among qualifiers are the Martin Fleisher IMP Fest . .6 squad, who finished with 189 victory points, followed closely Charging Ahead . .10 by Lou Ann O’Rourke (187) and Neil Rosen (180). Championship Diary . .12 In the McConnell, the 16 qualifiers will have the day off So Near And Yet... .13 today, starting their KO phase on Saturday. The two group Under Two Flags . .14 leaders were Valerie Westheimer and Full Spectrum Auctions. Smoke And Mirrors . .18 You can check the matchups at Philadelphia Regional Results . .19 http://www.swangames.com/magic/magic/www.php?nsid=370 13th WORLD BRIDGE SERIES Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A. Important Notices Change in Conditions of Contest Alerts The following change has been made The WBF Alerting Policy applies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teltscher Trophy
    The Teltscher Trophy Edinburgh 20 - 22 May 2016 Participating Players PARTICIPATING TEAMS Team A Northern Ireland Team B Scotland Team C England Team D Wales Team E Patron’s Team Team F Republic of Ireland Rex Anderson is a retired solicitor living in Coleraine NORTHERN and is currently writing a history of the NIBU. His Cam- rose career commenced in the 60’s when he played with IRELAND his father. Rex holds the record for Camrose caps hav- ing played just over 100 times. In 2015 he played on the Irish Senior Team which reached the quarter finals in the D’Orsi Bowl in Chennai. David Greenwood is a retired Financial Adviser. He has represented Ireland on a number of occasions, and has played in 5 Camrose matches with his wife Diane. His partnership with Rex has been the bedrock of the N Ireland Camrose team for many years. He is the only member of the team to have won the Camrose (albeit playing for England at the time!) Rex David Anderson Greenwood Ian Lindsay has represented the NIBU with five dif- ferent partners. He is a retired chartered accountant who now acts as Treasurer for six charities connected with music, the visual arts, health and the disabled. He devotes a great deal of time to bridge administration and is a past Secretary, Chairman, Congress Organiser, and President of the NIBU, and a past President of the Irish Bridge Union. Michael O’Kane is a retired solicitor from Downpat- rick with a keen interest in horseracing. He says he is a past everything in the NIBU, but has now opted for an easier life.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Gap Juanda1, Stefan Schwarze2, Stephan Von Cramon-Taubadel3 1
    The Access of Microenterprises to Commercial Microcredit in Aceh Besar: Closing the Gap Juanda1, Stefan Schwarze2, Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel3 1. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Tropical and International Agriculture, Germany; 2. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Germany; 3. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Germany Introduction . Reducing poverty has become an essential part of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and need to achieve. Microenterprises (MEs) have played an important role in rural developmental activities and were long recognized as vital in poverty alleviation in Indonesia. The developing world has in fact led the way in promoting the importance of rural finance. Access to commercial services is restricted in rural areas and the services can not meet the demand for financial services by rural households. Many microenterprises belong to poor and they are unable to provide collateral. Objectives Credit Limit There were two objectives formulated in this research: . In Indonesia, the official definition of microcredit covers all loans under IDR 50 million 1. To provide a review for the gap between the number of microenterprises (approximately US$5,500). being assisted and the overall number who might need assistance. Only seven percent of microenterprises have credit limit above IDR 50 million (Figure 4). 2. To determine effect of determinant factors which were found in research Figure 4. Credit limit of MEs area to ownership of standard collateral for access to microcredit. 1% Material and Methods 7% IDR, 1 US$ ≈ IDR9000 Figure 1. Map of Aceh Besar District 10% 0 40% • The Research was >0-10 million conducted in Aceh >10-20 million Besar Dist., Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam 42% >20-50 million Prov., Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter July 2005
    Newsletter July 2005 Message from the Chairman I am glad that we are able to resume issuing a Newsletter to members of the Club œ thanks to Chris Lamb who has nobly volunteered to take on the role of editor. Sadly, my first task here is to mention the recent deaths of two of our long-standing members, John Durden and Gillian James, to whose families we extend our sympathies. A short appreciation of both of them appears later in this Newsletter. Looking ahead, Club events through to August next year are set out in the 2005/2006 programme which accompanies this Newsletter. Its contents largely follow the pattern of previous years, but there are two points which I should like to draw to your attention. First, for a few days around Christmas, Bromley Mytime (the new managementspeak name for that part of the local authority which deals with public hall lettings) has denied us access to our usual playing accommodation. Fortunately, we have been able to arrange for the Club meetings affected to be held in the Methodist Church hall just along the road, which you will remember we used for several weeks some time ago when the Public Halls were closed for alterations. Second, the Sam Russell Championship Pairs competition will again be held over two sessions, in June 2006. Your Committee is, however, considering some change to its format in view of criticism from some members that the entry for a major Club competition like this should not be restricted to a maximum of 24 pairs. The reason for the restriction was to enable the competition to be on an all-play- all basis.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2018 Teltscher Trophy
    The 2018 Teltscher Trophy Beaufort Park Hotel near Mold 18th – 20th May 2018 The 2018 Teltscher Trophy Presented by the Welsh Bridge Union Welcome to the Beaufort Park Hotel Bridge Great Britain and the Welsh Bridge Union extend to all a warm welcome to the 2018 Teltscher Trophy. The venue is the Beaufort Park Hotel, which is situated near the historic market town of Mold. BBO Vugraph coverage will be broadcast in a separate room for spectators to watch the action live and we would welcome expert and instructive commentary there from sitting-out players, NPCs and other experts. The Open Room is in Regent 1, the Closed Room is in Regent 2, the Directors Room is in the Beaufort Room and the Vugraph Room is in the Palace Suite. Refreshments For all the players and officials, meal timings are as follows:- Friday - Dinner at 17.45 Saturday – Lunch at 14.05, dinner at 20.30. Sunday – Lunch at 14.05 pm, dinner at 20.30. Tea and coffee will be served between matches Timings Friday 17.00 Captain’s meeting 18.00 Dinner 19.30- D v F C v E B v A 21.25 21.40- A v C B v D F v E 23.35 Saturday 10.00- E v A F V B C v D 11.55 12.10- B v C A v F E v D 14.05 Lunch 15.00- F v C E v B D v A 16.55 17.10- F v D C v B A v E 19.05 20.30 Dinner Sunday 10.00- A v D B v E C v F 11.55 12.10- F v A D v B E v C 14.05 Lunch 15.00- E v F A v B D v C 16.55 17.10- C v A D v E B v F 19.05 19.45 Drinks reception 20.30 Prize-giving dinner The Teams England Sandra Penfold Norman Selway Tony Forrester David Kendrick John Holland NPC Derek Patterson Scotland Gerald Haase John Murdoch Iain Sime John Matheson James Forsyth Nigel Guthrie NPC Anne Perkins Republic of Ireland Enda Glynn Gay Keaveney Ranald Milne B.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkcell the Digital Operator
    Turkcell the Digital Operator Turkcell Annual Report 2018 About Turkcell Turkcell is a digital operator headquartered in Turkey, serving its customers with its unique portfolio of digital services along with voice, messaging, data and IPTV services on its mobile and fixed networks. Turkcell Group companies operate in 5 countries – Turkey, Ukraine, Belarus, Northern Cyprus, Germany. Turkcell launched LTE services in its home country on April 1st, 2016, employing LTE-Advanced and 3 carrier aggregation technologies in 81 cities. Turkcell offers up to 10 Gbps fiber internet speed with its FTTH services. Turkcell Group reported TRY 21.3 billion revenue in FY18 with total assets of TRY 42.8 billion as of December 31, 2018. It has been listed on the NYSE and the BIST since July 2000, and is the only NYSE-listed company in Turkey. Read more at www.turkcell.com.tr/english-support All financial results in this annual report are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and expressed in Turkish Lira (TRY or TL) unless otherwise stated. TABLE OF CONTENTS TRY Turkcell Group 16 Chairman’s Message 21.3 20 Board of Directors 22 Message from the CEO billion 26 Executive Officers 28 Top Management of Subsidiaries REVENUES 30 Turkcell Group 31 Our Vision, Target, Strategy and Approach 32 2018 at a Glance 34 2018 Highlights 36 The World’s 1st Digital Operator Brand: Lifecell 37 Turkcell’s Digital Services 2018 Operations 38 Exemplary Digital Operator 40 Our Superior Technology 41.3% 46 Our Consumer Business EBITDA 52 Our
    [Show full text]
  • The Practice of Concealment
    The practice of concealment Developing social history from physical evidence: a detailed exploration of artefacts hidden within a Victorian chaise longue and an interpretation of the significance of the contents Volume 1 By Carol Circuit A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the University’s requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2017 Buckinghamshire New University Coventry University COPYRIGHT This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author under the terms of the United Kingdom Copyright Acts. No quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. ABSTRACT The removal of a top cover from a Victorian chaise longue, in preparation for restoration work, revealed that the chaise had been stuffed with an assortment of Victorian clothes and tightly bound bundles of textiles rather than the traditional filling of horsehair. Amongst this stuffing was a label with a name and address which appeared to point to an association with the town of Leamington Spa and to the name of the person who may well have been the original owner of the chaise – one Miss Smith - and the opportunity to research this hidden cache proved irresistible. When handling the artefacts there was a very strong awareness that the last person to touch them had probably been Miss Smith, over one hundred years before me, and this provoked curiosity about what led her to create this cache. I have attempted to portray the contents of the cache as a narrative by taking a multi-disciplinary approach to try to put them into a context.
    [Show full text]